unlockalert

Today is one of the biggest days for TAC holders.
Many investors become nervous when they hear the word "token unlock." In most cases, unlock events increase the circulating supply and create selling pressure. Prices often fall because traders expect early investors to sell their tokens.
But sometimes, the market reacts in a completely different way.
And today, TAC is proving exactly that.
I'm holding TAC, and today's strong price movement is giving me even more confidence. Instead of panic, I'm seeing an opportunity.
For those who don't know, TAC is not just another meme coin or a short-term speculative project. It is a blockchain designed to connect Ethereum's DeFi ecosystem with TON and Telegram's massive user base. The project's goal is to bring EVM-based applications directly into Telegram through TON integration.
Think about it for a moment.
Telegram already has more than one billion users, while Ethereum has one of the largest developer communities in the crypto industry. TAC is trying to combine these two powerful ecosystems into a single network.
This is one of the biggest reasons why I believe TAC still has enormous potential.
Unlike many projects that launch without a real use case, TAC already has a clear utility model.
The TAC token isn't designed only for trading. It is used for:
- Paying gas fees
- Network security through staking
- Governance
- Supporting the entire TAC ecosystem and its applications
Every transaction on the network requires TAC. The more people use TAC-based applications, the greater the demand for the token could become. According to the project's documentation, activity generated through TON applications can create continuous buy pressure for TAC in the background.
Another reason I'm bullish is that TAC isn't building from zero.
The network launched with several major DeFi protocols already integrated into the ecosystem, including lending, swapping, yield farming, and liquidity applications. The project has also highlighted partnerships with well-known DeFi platforms and launched its mainnet with significant liquidity support.
Many blockchain projects fail because they cannot attract users.
TAC is taking a different approach.
Instead of trying to build a new community from scratch, it is targeting Telegram's existing ecosystem. That's a huge advantage.
Imagine using advanced DeFi applications directly inside Telegram without downloading additional wallets or learning complicated blockchain processes.
That's exactly the problem TAC is trying to solve.
Of course, every investment carries risk.
Token unlock events can increase volatility, and the crypto market can change within minutes. A pump today doesn't guarantee a pump tomorrow.
But from my perspective as a holder, today's movement is sending a strong message.
Sometimes, the market rewards projects that have strong fundamentals, real utility, and long-term vision.
I'm still holding my TAC bag.
I'm not here for a quick 10% trade.
I'm here because I believe the combination of Ethereum + TON (Now Gram) + Telegram could create one of the most interesting ecosystems in the crypto market.
Today's pump may be just the beginning.
If adoption continues to grow, if developers continue to build, and if Telegram becomes an even bigger gateway for Web3 users, then $TAC could have much more room to move.
I'm holding.
I'm watching.
And I believe today could become one of the most important days in the history of TAC.
#UnlockAlert
#TAC
#Gram
#MarketRebound
#BullishMomentum
$TAC
$GRAM
@Jeonlees
@乐天eth
@币圈老腊肉1688-kevin
@福星老师Z
@草根牛仔
@大禹-论币0
@Whale韭阴针鲸0628

#BTC
#Bincetrading # hype # sol #Xrp🔥🔥
#UnlockAlert

WASHINGTON, April 23 (Reuters) - The National Transportation Safety Board said Thursday a key runway safety system failed to ​activate before a March 22 fatal collision between an Air Canada Express ‌jet and a fire truck that killed two pilots.
The NTSB also said in its preliminary report that red runway entrance lights that indicate when it is not safe to cross a runway were ​on until about three seconds before the time of the collision. The ​NTSB said the system is designed to turn the lights off ⁠about 2 to 3 seconds before the airplane reaches each intersection.
The Express CRJ-900 ​regional jet touched down roughly 2 seconds before the collision and was at 104 ​mph at the time of the crash.
The NTSB is leading the investigation into the fatal collision of the CRJ-900 jet operated by Air Canada's regional partner Jazz Aviation. The crash sent 39 ​of the 76 passengers and crew to hospital, including six with serious injuries.
The ​airport's ground surveillance system did not generate an alert warning of the proximity of vehicles to the ‌runway ⁠and the fire truck that collided with the jet lacked a transponder that would have transmitted its location to air traffic control.
The turret operator in the truck involved in the collision recalled hearing the words "stop stop stop" (on the tower frequency) radio, ​but he did not ​know who that ⁠transmission was intended for and then heard "Truck 1 stop stop stop" and realized it was for their vehicle and subsequently ​noticed that they had entered the runway, the NTSB said.
The ​NTSB said ⁠the local controller who was handling the Air Canada plane had about 18 years of experience and the ground controller who was also the controller-in-charge had about 19 years ⁠of ​experience, and was responsible handling aircraft that were taxiing.
The ​Federal Aviation Administration has encouraged airports to equip fire trucks with transponders because it makes the vehicles' ​movements easier to track at busy airports.
#PresidentialDebate
#OopsieDaisy
#IDKwhatIamdoing
#UnlockAlert
#YourFavoriteInfluencer

The text released Friday blocks crypto firms from offering stablecoin yield offerings that look like bank deposits, but "bona fide" transactions are allowed.
Coming to an agreement means there's likely nothing in the way of a Senate Banking Committee hearing (known as a markup) that could finally advance the legislation another key step in its progress through the Senate, though there are a number of other negotiation points that haven't been publicly resolved.
Mark it up," Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong wrote in a posting on social media site X. His company had been at the center of the talks and potentially had the most to lose from restrictions on stablecoin rewards.
Coinbase's chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, said in a separate post that this language "preserves activity-based rewards tied to real participation on crypto platforms and networks, which is what the bank lobby said they wanted," adding that "we’re focused on getting a bill done and are satisifed that this language should not be the basis of any objection."
In its legalese, the new text reads, "No covered party shall, directly or indirectly, pay any form of interest on yield (whether in cash, tokens, or other consideration) to a restricted recipient — (A) solely in connection with the holding of such restricted recipient's payment stablecoins; or (B) on a payment stablecoin balance in a manner that is economically or functionally equivalent to the payment of interest or yield on an interest-bearing bank deposit."
This restriction does not apply to incentives "based on bona fide activities or bona fide transactions" that are different from yield generated by interest-bearing bank deposits, the text said, maintaining an approach to rewards that's similar to what financial firms offer on credit card activity. The restriction does apply to loyalty programs or similar efforts.
One individual at a crypto company said this would require digital asset firms to restructure how they offer yield, moving from a "buy and hold" system to "buy and use" to meet the transaction caveats in the text.
It's difficult to say how exactly this might work, the person said, pointing to the rulemaking provisions in the text, which direct the Treasury Department and Commodity Futures Trading Commission to launch a rulemaking within a year of the bill becoming law that lays out more clearly how and when crypto firms can offer yield.
The way the rulemaking provision is worded could give regulators latitude in how they define what crypto companies can do with yield products, said Corey Frayer, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America. He said the wording of the rulemaking section could allow crypto firms to conduct the activities and then pay the returns back to customers. The wording in the section allows regulators to consider balance, duration and tenure as a factor in rewards calculation. Other factors that would be considered include the definition of the activity and whether some sort of incentive program is used.
Senators Alsobrooks and Tillis have been negotiating details of the text for the last few months, after a Senate Banking Committee markup on the overall Clarity Act was postponed last-minute in January. Since then, bank lobbyists and crypto insiders have been weighing in on the compromise effort, sometimes in session hosted by the White House.
The text also includes anti-evasion language.
In March, the lawmakers had said they'd struck an agreement that blocked crypto firms from offering yield that looked like deposit interest but did allow them to structure rewards programs that didn't rival banks' core products.
In a statement, Digital Chamber CEO Cody Carbone said the trade association "welcomes the public release of stablecoin yield language as an important step toward resolving one of the final issues standing between the Committee and a markup. We are encouraged to see this process moving forward and will continue advocating for the power of rewards to drive consumer utility, competition, and innovation across the digital asset ecosystem.
#BinanceHerYerde
#haroonahmadofficial
#YourFavoriteInfluencer
#UnlockAlert
#LUNCDream

Harrisx, a public opinion research and polling firm, released a national survey on May 7 showing broad voter support for the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act of 2025. The poll found 52% supported the bill after voters reviewed a policy summary of the legislation, while 11% opposed it. Harrisx surveyed 2,008 registered voters from May 1-4, 2026, with a margin of error of 2.2 percentage points.
Support for the CLARITY Act extended across political groups after voters reviewed a summary of the legislation. Republicans, Democrats, independents, and likely midterm voters all backed the bill by wide margins. Support was strongest among crypto owners, voters familiar with digital assets, and respondents already aware of CLARITY. Awareness of the legislation remained limited overall, with 64% saying they had not heard of the bill before the survey. Another 14% said they had heard a lot, while 22% had heard a little.
Digital asset familiarity remains uneven, though crypto ownership has become politically relevant. Harrisx found 39% of voters are familiar with digital assets and blockchain technology, while 61% are not. Still, two in five voters have purchased crypto at some point, and 30% bought crypto in the past year. The survey found familiarity and ownership are concentrated among men and voters under 35. Separately, 70% said the United States should already have passed clear cryptocurrency legislation, while 60% preferred federal legislation over case-by-case enforcement.
Offshore market structure added urgency to the findings. Only one-third of voters knew eight of the 10 largest cryptocurrency exchanges are based outside the United States. After learning that, 46% said crypto trading beyond U.S. oversight is at least somewhat problematic, while only 13% called it fine or good. The CLARITY Act would clarify whether the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) oversees different digital assets. It would also create registration rules for exchanges and custodians and establish consumer protection standards for the digital asset industry.National security ranked as the strongest argument for passing the legislation. Harrisx found 56% of voters said future digital payment systems built and controlled outside the United States would weaken U.S. national security. More than two in five voters said foreign-issued stablecoins becoming dominant would weaken the global role of the U.S. dollar. When asked which argument best supported CLARITY, 23% chose keeping the dollar and U.S. payment systems central to global finance. Law enforcement and illicit finance followed at 17%, while consumer protection and fraud prevention reached 16%.
Election findings gave the bill added political weight. Harrisx found 37% of voters would be more likely to support a senator who votes for CLARITY, while 17% would be less likely, creating a net 20-point benefit. The effect remained positive with Republicans, Democrats, and independents. Another 47% said they would consider voting outside their preferred party if that candidate supported CLARITY and their party did not. For the 2026 midterms, 52% said a candidate’s position on cryptocurrency regulation will be at least somewhat important to their vote. Among crypto owners, that figure rose to 78%.
The findings came as the U.S. Senate Banking Committee scheduled a May 14 executive session to consider the CLARITY Act. The markup was set to give lawmakers their first formal committee debate over the bill and determine whether it advances to the full Senate vote.
#PresidentialDebate
#orocryptotrends
#INNOVATION
#UnlockAlert
#YourFavoriteInfluencer