NES (version 7.11-2): Third report for the same coin on the same day; up 5.25% vs down 7.91%, price 0.289 vs 0.268. The difference in collection timestamps reveals subtle micro-level market fluctuations
On the same day (7.11), the same coin—this is the third NES report (previous two: 7.11-4 down 7.91%, 7.12-5 down 6.89%, 7.12-6 down 5.33%). This one shows up 5.25%, price 0.289, market cap 267 million, daily volume 41.74 million, liquidity 1.57 million, top ten hold 98.7%, net sell 14,000.
Same coin, same day, different reports—gains and losses alternate (+5.25%, -7.91%), price differs by 7.8%, market cap differs by 19 million. The core structure remains unchanged: top ten at 98.7% absolute control, dual contract privileges (can issue more + can upgrade), clear evidence of wash trading, zero social traction, and 7,256 token-holding addresses have no say under high concentration.
Net sell 14,000 vs 101,700—there is a huge difference in sell pressure between the up/down reports, indicating that at the collection timestamps, the captured moments reflect different times in the market maker’s bidirectional volume spoofing. The “Wash Trading” highlight column is a smoking gun.
The price oscillates in the 0.25–0.29 range, large holders unload in batches, contract privileges provide a safety net, and retail bag-holds. No matter how the up/down reports are switched, the essence remains the same.
**Core conclusion: For the same coin on the same day across multiple reports, gains and losses alternate; extreme centralized control + dual contract privileges + wash trading confirmed—micro-level market fluctuations don’t change the underlying “harvesting” nature.**
#NES #Gains and losses alternate on the same day