cftc

📅 February 2 | According to the investment bank TD Cowen, crypto legislation in the United States could remain stalled indefinitely if the president doesn't personally intervene to force an agreement between two sectors that, in theory, should want the same thing, but which are now more divided than ever.

📖The analysis comes from Jaret Seiberg, director of TD Cowen's Washington research group, who noted that the meeting convened today by the White House crypto czar, David Sacks, with banking groups, crypto associations, and Coinbase, revolves around the most contentious point of the bill: how stablecoin rewards should be handled.
Banks warn that allowing crypto platforms to offer returns without clear limits could drain deposits from the traditional banking system, particularly affecting community banks. From the crypto side, companies like Coinbase maintain that this issue was already discussed during the negotiations of the GENIUS Act, passed last July, and that it is now being used as an excuse to stifle competition.
However, Jaret Seiberg argues that the real debate is not whether platforms will be able to pay returns, because he considers that inevitable, but rather when they will be allowed to do so and under what level of regulatory oversight they will have to operate.
From a banking perspective, stablecoins don't yet pose a real threat to deposits until they become more widely used, and in the meantime, they compete more directly with money market funds.
But the problem doesn't end there. Jaret Seiberg warns that a division exists within the crypto industry itself. For years, legal ambiguity has acted as a barrier to entry, benefiting certain established players.
Clear legislation would allow banks, brokers, and large regulated institutions to enter the market more forcefully, increasing competition for current players.
Added to this is an even greater obstacle: Democratic support in the Senate. For the project to move forward, it would need at least 10 Democratic senators, who would demand stricter protections for investors, tougher anti-money laundering regulations, and severe rules on conflicts of interest that many crypto companies would prefer to avoid.

Topic Opinion:
The biggest barrier to crypto legislation is not regulatory, but political and strategic. There are players within the ecosystem itself who aren't in such a hurry for complete clarity, because the current ambiguity also benefits them. And on the political front, the reputational cost for Democrats of supporting a law that might appear favorable to interests close to Trump is increasingly high.
💬 Do you think Trump will actually intervene to unblock the crypto law?

Leave your comment...
#TRUMP #Stablecoins #SEC #CFTC #CryptoNews $USDC $USD1 $TRUMP

Introduction:

In the United States, a major piece of crypto legislation — often called the Crypto Market Structure Bill or Clarity Act — is one of the hottest regulatory topics in Washington today. Lawmakers, industry leaders, and regulators are debating how to create clear rules for digital assets. The latest shows both progress and political friction.
What Happened

U.S. lawmakers have been working for more than a year on a bill designed to define how crypto markets operate under U.S. law — clarifying which regulators oversee various parts of the industry and how digital assets should be treated. The House passed its version of the bill in 2025, but the Senate is still debating the details, and progress has been uneven. Key updates from the past week include:

The Senate Agriculture Committee advanced the bill, aiming to give the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) clearer authority over crypto markets.
A White House meeting with crypto and banking leaders is scheduled to try to resolve disagreements over key provisions, especially around stablecoins and regulatory jurisdiction.
Industry voices — including major exchanges like Coinbase — have voiced concerns about specific parts of the legislation, showing that some crypto firms want changes before they formally support the framework.

Analysts and legal experts say this bill could be one of the most important pieces of crypto policy in years, but it still faces obstacles in Congress and could take longer than expected to become law.
Why It Matters

For the crypto ecosystem — whether developers, exchanges, traders, or curious observers — this bill represents a long-awaited attempt to finally put clear federal rules around digital assets. Right now, much of crypto in the U.S. is regulated by a patchwork of agencies with overlapping authority. The proposed bill aims to change that with a structured regulatory framework.

Here’s why this matters

Regulatory clarity: Clearer definitions can help businesses know which agency oversees their activities — reducing uncertainty.Consumer protections: Many lawmakers want the bill to include user safeguards, especially around things like custody and stablecoins.
Institutional participation: Clear rules could encourage more traditional financial players to engage with digital assets.
Market confidence: A transparent structure can help ordinary users better understand the rules, potentially boosting confidence in the space.
Political negotiation: Because crypto intersects finance, technology, and banking, lawmakers from different parties and industries are negotiating heavily — which affects the timeline.
Key Takeaways

The U.S. Crypto Market Structure Bill aims to create clear laws for digital assets — including defining regulatory authority and market rules.
The House already passed its version; the Senate is actively debating amendments now.
Major industry actors, regulators, and banking leaders are involved in negotiations — showing how impactful these rules could be.
Delays and disagreements mean final passage isn’t guaranteed by a set date yet.This process matters because it could shape how crypto operates legally in the U.S. for years to come.

#CryptoRegulation #CryptoLaw #DigitalAssets #BlockchainPolicy #CFTC