南方白龙321
2.1k Posts
南方白龙321
2.8K+ Following
23.2K+ Followers
2.7K+ Liked
Posts
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
听澜321
·
--
The U.S. stock earnings season is about to get lively.
S&P 500 expected earnings growth is more than 23%, marking the eighth consecutive quarter of double-digit growth.
But my view is very direct: the better the data looks, the more you need to be careful.
The reason is actually simple:
NVIDIA is a “big player,” not a normal company.
It just announced an additional $150 billion share repurchase, with authorization up to $235 billion. What does a repurchase mean? It means the company thinks its stock price is “quite cheap.” Think about it—one of the giants with 70% year-over-year growth says it’s cheap…
But in my opinion, NVIDIA’s biggest risk isn’t its performance—it’s that it’s tied the entire AI ecosystem too tightly. It provides guarantees for OpenAI, insures loans for neocloud, and even wants to shift the risk of AI chip collateral loans to insurance companies🤐
This isn’t just selling chips anymore—it’s providing credit backing for the whole industry. With a scale this large, if it stumbles, it becomes a systemic risk~
$MU is a bet that “the cycle will turn into growth,” and that’s where the biggest disagreement lies.
Tonight’s earnings: the market expects revenue of $50.9 billion and EPS of 31.49, up +342% year over year. Morgan Stanley poured cold water early, saying EPS could be only 31.2😂 But the key isn’t this quarter—it’s the fiscal 2027 guidance.
Micron is currently trading at just 6.8x earnings for 2027, which clearly suggests the market doesn’t believe this memory upcycle can last.
My personal take: if Micron’s guidance tonight proves that AI demand has turned the “cycle” into “growth,” then this is basically free money; if the guidance is average, then the good news is already priced in…
$SNDK is “the one with the most upside,” but don’t be fooled by the rally~
It’s up 1,663% in a year! Market cap went from $6.6 billion to $266 billion. It also announced a $14 billion repurchase. But SanDisk is doing NAND, and its cyclical nature is even more intense than Micron’s DRAM.
My personal view: once it’s already surged 16x and you still talk about being “bullish,” it takes a lot of courage😂 Analysts’ average target price is $2,136, and it looks like there may be more room—but if NAND prices turn around, the valuation could get slashed ruthlessly. It suits people who bet on the track, not those who want something they can hold onto~
One more thing: expectations are already stretched to the max.
The biggest trap in earnings season is “beating expectations” itself. When all the analysts keep raising their numbers and raising them, even a decent earnings report from the company is very likely to mean the good news is already exhausted~
If you have other thoughts, feel free to leave them in the comments section~
#股票财报季
S&P 500 expected earnings growth is more than 23%, marking the eighth consecutive quarter of double-digit growth.
But my view is very direct: the better the data looks, the more you need to be careful.
The reason is actually simple:
NVIDIA is a “big player,” not a normal company.
It just announced an additional $150 billion share repurchase, with authorization up to $235 billion. What does a repurchase mean? It means the company thinks its stock price is “quite cheap.” Think about it—one of the giants with 70% year-over-year growth says it’s cheap…
But in my opinion, NVIDIA’s biggest risk isn’t its performance—it’s that it’s tied the entire AI ecosystem too tightly. It provides guarantees for OpenAI, insures loans for neocloud, and even wants to shift the risk of AI chip collateral loans to insurance companies🤐
This isn’t just selling chips anymore—it’s providing credit backing for the whole industry. With a scale this large, if it stumbles, it becomes a systemic risk~
$MU is a bet that “the cycle will turn into growth,” and that’s where the biggest disagreement lies.
Tonight’s earnings: the market expects revenue of $50.9 billion and EPS of 31.49, up +342% year over year. Morgan Stanley poured cold water early, saying EPS could be only 31.2😂 But the key isn’t this quarter—it’s the fiscal 2027 guidance.
Micron is currently trading at just 6.8x earnings for 2027, which clearly suggests the market doesn’t believe this memory upcycle can last.
My personal take: if Micron’s guidance tonight proves that AI demand has turned the “cycle” into “growth,” then this is basically free money; if the guidance is average, then the good news is already priced in…
$SNDK is “the one with the most upside,” but don’t be fooled by the rally~
It’s up 1,663% in a year! Market cap went from $6.6 billion to $266 billion. It also announced a $14 billion repurchase. But SanDisk is doing NAND, and its cyclical nature is even more intense than Micron’s DRAM.
My personal view: once it’s already surged 16x and you still talk about being “bullish,” it takes a lot of courage😂 Analysts’ average target price is $2,136, and it looks like there may be more room—but if NAND prices turn around, the valuation could get slashed ruthlessly. It suits people who bet on the track, not those who want something they can hold onto~
One more thing: expectations are already stretched to the max.
The biggest trap in earnings season is “beating expectations” itself. When all the analysts keep raising their numbers and raising them, even a decent earnings report from the company is very likely to mean the good news is already exhausted~
If you have other thoughts, feel free to leave them in the comments section~
#股票财报季
Quoted content has been removed
Quoted content has been removed
·
--
🎙️ Build Binance Square, hold BNB | Tuesday, the market is all red—has the opportunity to bottom-fish arrived? Let's chat~
End
04 h 51 m 58 s
11.2k
51
听澜321
·
--
$XAU This latest dive, actually, is caused by oil prices “acting up”~
The US and Iran have stalled in the Strait of Hormuz, and Brent crude has climbed back above the $100 mark.
When oil prices rise, inflation expectations can’t cool down, so the Fed not only dares not cut rates—it may even keep hiking.
And what gold fears most is this, because gold itself doesn’t generate interest.
Even US Treasury yields are surging to above 5.2%, making the “opportunity cost” of holding gold unbelievably high.
This round of sell-off pushed gold down to $4,144, and there’s a detail that most people might overlook:
The main force behind this dump isn’t retail panic—it’s central banks themselves selling~
Isn’t that logic kind of counterintuitive?
Because in traditional thinking, central banks are gold’s “ever-bullish” side—they’ve been buying for nearly two years straight.
But once oil prices break above $100, the situation changes:
Central banks with higher reliance on energy imports need to sell gold reserves to raise dollars, stabilize the exchange rate, and buy oil.
Buying is strategic allocation; selling is a survival necessity 😂
So this drop isn’t because “faith in gold” has failed.
It’s because liquidity has been squeezed—it's not that gold is suddenly worthless; it’s that money has become more “expensive.”
My personal view is: don’t try to guess the bottom in the short term—wait until oil prices stabilize first.
Only when central banks are no longer forced to sell gold will the bottom truly be solid.
What you may be catching now could be a “flying knife” 😂—or pressure being released from central banks’ selling.
So I still recommend entering the market cautiously~
What do you think? Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments~
#黄金跌至4144美元
The US and Iran have stalled in the Strait of Hormuz, and Brent crude has climbed back above the $100 mark.
When oil prices rise, inflation expectations can’t cool down, so the Fed not only dares not cut rates—it may even keep hiking.
And what gold fears most is this, because gold itself doesn’t generate interest.
Even US Treasury yields are surging to above 5.2%, making the “opportunity cost” of holding gold unbelievably high.
This round of sell-off pushed gold down to $4,144, and there’s a detail that most people might overlook:
The main force behind this dump isn’t retail panic—it’s central banks themselves selling~
Isn’t that logic kind of counterintuitive?
Because in traditional thinking, central banks are gold’s “ever-bullish” side—they’ve been buying for nearly two years straight.
But once oil prices break above $100, the situation changes:
Central banks with higher reliance on energy imports need to sell gold reserves to raise dollars, stabilize the exchange rate, and buy oil.
Buying is strategic allocation; selling is a survival necessity 😂
So this drop isn’t because “faith in gold” has failed.
It’s because liquidity has been squeezed—it's not that gold is suddenly worthless; it’s that money has become more “expensive.”
My personal view is: don’t try to guess the bottom in the short term—wait until oil prices stabilize first.
Only when central banks are no longer forced to sell gold will the bottom truly be solid.
What you may be catching now could be a “flying knife” 😂—or pressure being released from central banks’ selling.
So I still recommend entering the market cautiously~
What do you think? Feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments~
#黄金跌至4144美元
南方白龙321
·
--
#Bitget — update for today
The attack of September 24 drained approximately US$ 387.5–388 million in assets. According to an investigation released today, the intruder allegedly obtained high-level internal credentials through a vulnerability in a third-party security product and used those credentials to issue fraudulent withdrawal orders.
The most important development as of September 28 is that Bitget has started reopening withdrawals in stages. Withdrawals of $BTC resumed today; $ETH is scheduled for 29/9, $USDT for 30/9, and the remaining assets, fiat and P2P for 2/10, according to the published timetable.
Another important point: Bitget states that private keys and cold wallets were not compromised and that the losses will be covered by the user protection fund.
And there is an even more recent development: funds linked to the attack began moving again, according to the investigation.
#Bitget
The attack of September 24 drained approximately US$ 387.5–388 million in assets. According to an investigation released today, the intruder allegedly obtained high-level internal credentials through a vulnerability in a third-party security product and used those credentials to issue fraudulent withdrawal orders.
The most important development as of September 28 is that Bitget has started reopening withdrawals in stages. Withdrawals of $BTC resumed today; $ETH is scheduled for 29/9, $USDT for 30/9, and the remaining assets, fiat and P2P for 2/10, according to the published timetable.
Another important point: Bitget states that private keys and cold wallets were not compromised and that the losses will be covered by the user protection fund.
And there is an even more recent development: funds linked to the attack began moving again, according to the investigation.
#Bitget
听澜321
·
--
🌺The post is on the trending hot list, #1!
Thanks to #币安 Official
Maybe we can get some subsistence allowance now? Haha😃
#Bitget黑客转移8300万美元被盗XRP
Thanks to #币安 Official
Maybe we can get some subsistence allowance now? Haha😃
#Bitget黑客转移8300万美元被盗XRP
·
--
🎙️ Build the Binance Square, hold BNB｜New Monday—will there be a good market move? Let's chat~
End
05 h 07 m 41 s
12.6k
41
听澜321
·
--
#Bitget Hackers have started transferring about $83 million stolen $XRP
But what keeps people up at night isn’t that number.
It’s this: there are another $75 million worth of XRP sitting in the hackers’ wallet—no one can touch it.
Why can’t they move it? Because XRP is a “native asset.” The key takeaway is that, as a native asset, Ripple can’t directly freeze it the way it can freeze USDC. That’s the most important lesson from this incident.
Do you not understand what that means?
Plainly: USDT gets stolen, and Tether can freeze with one click. If USDC gets stolen, Circle can blacklist addresses. This time, the stablecoins the hacker has are only about 320k US dollars in total—and they’ve already been frozen.
But XRP is different. Ripple doesn’t have that power. In the XRP Ledger rules, there isn’t even a button for “freezing native assets.”
The hacker can take their time and move the coins to any exchange, swap them for $BTC , swap them for $ETH , or anything else.
Throughout the entire process, no one can stop them.
On the first day after the incident, Richard Teng personally posted that Binance’s security team has been sharing intelligence with Bitget since day one and tracking the funds.
CZ also publicly said he’s willing to help. Exchanges didn’t just trade jokes—this time they cooperated.
The reason is simple: when an attacker transfers funds across platforms, the freezing effect of any single exchange is limited. Today you laugh at Bitget; tomorrow the hacker might come to your place.
But what Binance can do is only one thing: if the hacker moves XRP into Binance, Binance can lock that account and prevent withdrawals. However, the hacker’s wallet itself—Binance can’t touch it, and Ripple can’t either.
I think the most valuable lesson of this incident isn’t whether “Bitget will go under,” and it isn’t whether “the hackers are North Korean.”
It’s that after something goes wrong, “native assets” and “issuer-issued tokens” receive radically different treatment. The “decentralization” you hold has another side: there’s “no safety net.”
This doesn’t mean XRP is bad. What I’m saying is: when choosing assets, you need to understand that some coins have someone to backstop them when things go wrong, while with others you can only hope for the hacker’s mood.
Binance helps Bitget track the stolen funds—credit where it’s due 👍🏻
But Binance can’t help XRP holders—that’s the part this incident is most important to remember.
If you have other views, feel free to comment in the comment section—
#Bitget黑客转移8300万美元被盗XRP
But what keeps people up at night isn’t that number.
It’s this: there are another $75 million worth of XRP sitting in the hackers’ wallet—no one can touch it.
Why can’t they move it? Because XRP is a “native asset.” The key takeaway is that, as a native asset, Ripple can’t directly freeze it the way it can freeze USDC. That’s the most important lesson from this incident.
Do you not understand what that means?
Plainly: USDT gets stolen, and Tether can freeze with one click. If USDC gets stolen, Circle can blacklist addresses. This time, the stablecoins the hacker has are only about 320k US dollars in total—and they’ve already been frozen.
But XRP is different. Ripple doesn’t have that power. In the XRP Ledger rules, there isn’t even a button for “freezing native assets.”
The hacker can take their time and move the coins to any exchange, swap them for $BTC , swap them for $ETH , or anything else.
Throughout the entire process, no one can stop them.
On the first day after the incident, Richard Teng personally posted that Binance’s security team has been sharing intelligence with Bitget since day one and tracking the funds.
CZ also publicly said he’s willing to help. Exchanges didn’t just trade jokes—this time they cooperated.
The reason is simple: when an attacker transfers funds across platforms, the freezing effect of any single exchange is limited. Today you laugh at Bitget; tomorrow the hacker might come to your place.
But what Binance can do is only one thing: if the hacker moves XRP into Binance, Binance can lock that account and prevent withdrawals. However, the hacker’s wallet itself—Binance can’t touch it, and Ripple can’t either.
I think the most valuable lesson of this incident isn’t whether “Bitget will go under,” and it isn’t whether “the hackers are North Korean.”
It’s that after something goes wrong, “native assets” and “issuer-issued tokens” receive radically different treatment. The “decentralization” you hold has another side: there’s “no safety net.”
This doesn’t mean XRP is bad. What I’m saying is: when choosing assets, you need to understand that some coins have someone to backstop them when things go wrong, while with others you can only hope for the hacker’s mood.
Binance helps Bitget track the stolen funds—credit where it’s due 👍🏻
But Binance can’t help XRP holders—that’s the part this incident is most important to remember.
If you have other views, feel free to comment in the comment section—
#Bitget黑客转移8300万美元被盗XRP
·
--
🎙️ Building the Binance Plaza, holding BNB｜On Sunday, has BTC been consolidating at 84,000 for days—are we about to see a new round of takeoff? Come chat～
End
05 h 23 m 43 s
14.8k
53
听澜321
·
--
$QNT 24 hours increase exceeds 39%!
To put it simply, this rally comes down to one big “real job” it did.
The U.S. clearing organization that oversees the settlement of 25 major banks—the Clearing House—picked QNT’s technology to power the network for “tokenized deposits.” This system settles more than $2 trillion in volume per day.
In the UK as well, banks like HSBC and Barclays have just run QNT’s underlying tech to complete the first real tokenized deposit transaction.
So I think the logic behind this surge isn’t “trading a concept,”
but that QNT has genuinely been integrated into the banking system’s pipeline.
In my view, QNT is different from most cryptocurrencies. It doesn’t rely on trade signals or memes—it follows a “selling shovels to banks” strategy.
This rise happened because the shovels were truly sold, and the buyer is also “the real deal”—a legitimate player.
But I want to remind everyone of two points:
1️⃣ The technology banks use doesn’t necessarily mean the QNT coin will be bought in large quantities.
2️⃣ This network won’t officially launch until 2027. The good news is still far off. It’s already up more than 30% in the short term—chasing higher now can easily get you buried.
My personal view: QNT is worth putting on your watchlist, but don’t get carried away based on just one piece of news.
What do you think? If you have other opinions, feel free to leave them in the comments!
#QNT #QNT上涨39%
To put it simply, this rally comes down to one big “real job” it did.
The U.S. clearing organization that oversees the settlement of 25 major banks—the Clearing House—picked QNT’s technology to power the network for “tokenized deposits.” This system settles more than $2 trillion in volume per day.
In the UK as well, banks like HSBC and Barclays have just run QNT’s underlying tech to complete the first real tokenized deposit transaction.
So I think the logic behind this surge isn’t “trading a concept,”
but that QNT has genuinely been integrated into the banking system’s pipeline.
In my view, QNT is different from most cryptocurrencies. It doesn’t rely on trade signals or memes—it follows a “selling shovels to banks” strategy.
This rise happened because the shovels were truly sold, and the buyer is also “the real deal”—a legitimate player.
But I want to remind everyone of two points:
1️⃣ The technology banks use doesn’t necessarily mean the QNT coin will be bought in large quantities.
2️⃣ This network won’t officially launch until 2027. The good news is still far off. It’s already up more than 30% in the short term—chasing higher now can easily get you buried.
My personal view: QNT is worth putting on your watchlist, but don’t get carried away based on just one piece of news.
What do you think? If you have other opinions, feel free to leave them in the comments!
#QNT #QNT上涨39%
听澜321
·
--
🌺@听澜321 The most moving kind of fulfillment in this world was never the moon
but rather those who still choose to stand firm,
knowing no one will clap for them!
Happy Mid-Autumn Festival🥮
We all deserve to be treated gently by moonlight~
#Bitget遭黑客攻击损失3.52亿美元 #中秋节快乐
but rather those who still choose to stand firm,
knowing no one will clap for them!
Happy Mid-Autumn Festival🥮
We all deserve to be treated gently by moonlight~
#Bitget遭黑客攻击损失3.52亿美元 #中秋节快乐
听澜321
·
--
🌺@听澜321 As the autumn breeze rises and the moonlight grows rich, it’s that time of year again when the world gathers in reunion!
May every loneliness find an echo
May everyone who works quietly be softly illuminated by moonlight
In honor of the moonlight
In honor of yourself
In honor of the world~
#比特币24小时跌3.3%失守83000美元 #中秋节快乐
May every loneliness find an echo
May everyone who works quietly be softly illuminated by moonlight
In honor of the moonlight
In honor of yourself
In honor of the world~
#比特币24小时跌3.3%失守83000美元 #中秋节快乐
听澜321
·
--
Brothers, the AI sector has gone crazy again recently 😂
Why is everything rising?
Come, come—let me break down what’s going on: OpenAI released a new model, GPT-6. This model can operate a computer on its own to do work. Nvidia’s CEO Huang directly said, “AGI has already arrived.” Meta rolled out an AI assistant called Muse, whose downloads even surpassed ChatGPT.
Then the capital markets went into an all-out frenzy.
To put it plainly, there are really two things: first, AI is truly starting to do work—not just chat; second, compute power still isn’t enough, so everyone keeps抢芯片 (fighting for chips).
The South Korean storage-chip leader $SKHY jumped 8% in a day. In China’s A-shares, hardware plays like optical modules and PCB stocks went up in bulk, hitting the daily limit. After Meta’s AI assistant suddenly caught on and went viral, the market suddenly realized: the AI application side is about to take off—so how many times will the underlying compute need to increase to meet demand?
Let me share a personal opinion—maybe not necessarily correct:
In the short term, AI is a bit overheated. This kind of surge driven by news is risky if you chase the price. Look—Nvidia executives have been selling down, and even Huang cashed out about a hundred million in the process.
But the medium-term direction is fine. Some institutions say this round is more like the 1998 situation rather than the peak of the 2000 bubble—the industrial logic is still being realized. As for compute, as long as the models keep iterating, demand won’t stop.
My personal take: don’t chase; wait for a pullback.
The hardware side has more certainty than the application side. No matter which model comes out, they all need to buy chips, buy storage, and buy optical modules. The application side is still in the “storytelling” phase—who will truly succeed is still hard to say.
Finally, one more reminder: interest rates in the US stock market are still high, and liquidity isn’t as loose as people imagine—so don’t get carried away, okay?
#AI股持续上涨还有哪些投资机会
Why is everything rising?
Come, come—let me break down what’s going on: OpenAI released a new model, GPT-6. This model can operate a computer on its own to do work. Nvidia’s CEO Huang directly said, “AGI has already arrived.” Meta rolled out an AI assistant called Muse, whose downloads even surpassed ChatGPT.
Then the capital markets went into an all-out frenzy.
To put it plainly, there are really two things: first, AI is truly starting to do work—not just chat; second, compute power still isn’t enough, so everyone keeps抢芯片 (fighting for chips).
The South Korean storage-chip leader $SKHY jumped 8% in a day. In China’s A-shares, hardware plays like optical modules and PCB stocks went up in bulk, hitting the daily limit. After Meta’s AI assistant suddenly caught on and went viral, the market suddenly realized: the AI application side is about to take off—so how many times will the underlying compute need to increase to meet demand?
Let me share a personal opinion—maybe not necessarily correct:
In the short term, AI is a bit overheated. This kind of surge driven by news is risky if you chase the price. Look—Nvidia executives have been selling down, and even Huang cashed out about a hundred million in the process.
But the medium-term direction is fine. Some institutions say this round is more like the 1998 situation rather than the peak of the 2000 bubble—the industrial logic is still being realized. As for compute, as long as the models keep iterating, demand won’t stop.
My personal take: don’t chase; wait for a pullback.
The hardware side has more certainty than the application side. No matter which model comes out, they all need to buy chips, buy storage, and buy optical modules. The application side is still in the “storytelling” phase—who will truly succeed is still hard to say.
Finally, one more reminder: interest rates in the US stock market are still high, and liquidity isn’t as loose as people imagine—so don’t get carried away, okay?
#AI股持续上涨还有哪些投资机会
·
--
🎙️ Build the Binance Plaza, hold BNB｜On Wednesday, the market's bullish “the bulls are here” sentiment is running high—did everyone get their share? Let’s chat～
End
05 h 03 m 16 s
11.3k
51
听澜321
·
--
🌺@听澜321 from 66.6k to 77.7k, and you’ve made another small leap forward.
The next goal is my favorite number: 88.8k!😍
#比特币突破8.5万美元
The next goal is my favorite number: 88.8k!😍
#比特币突破8.5万美元
听澜321
·
--
$NEAR One week surges 80%!
This wave isn’t pumping the coin price—it’s the “husband chain finally getting some business” 😂
Personally, I think the most direct kick that drove this NEAR rally is the “$3.33 unlocking plan.”
NEAR came up with an option-like airdrop mechanism: users first need to deposit assets into its privacy account to complete the trades. The rewarded tokens you receive also can’t be sold for now—you must wait until NEAR’s 3-day average price holds steady above $3.33 before you can convert them 1:1 into the real NEAR. In plain terms, the project team is using over $1 million in rewards to lock the market’s attention tightly around the $3.33 level.
As soon as the 3-day average requirement is met, the rewards unlock—so buy pressure follows right after it~
In the short term, it doubled within a week, but open interest is also shrinking, which suggests the leverage chasing the pump is being flushed out. From the mid-to-long-term perspective, if Intents trading volume can hold up, NEAR’s story can shift from a “high-performance chain” to a “privacy transaction settlement layer,” and the narrative can level up to a higher tier~
I think: with a surge this wild, there really is something substantive behind it—Intents’ weekly trading volume breaking 1 billion is genuinely real.
But after an 80% jump in a week, RSI was already overbought.
At this point, I don’t recommend everyone chase the price up. You can first watch to see after any pullback: can $3.33 hold? Are the product metrics still there?
If it holds, it’s a swap of the engine. If it doesn’t, then it’s a classic “pump to unload.” When it’s rising, everyone becomes an analyst 😂
Only when it drops and you can still hold—that’s real conviction.
What do you think about this big rally? Feel free to leave a comment in the comment section~
#NEAR一周涨近80%
This wave isn’t pumping the coin price—it’s the “husband chain finally getting some business” 😂
Personally, I think the most direct kick that drove this NEAR rally is the “$3.33 unlocking plan.”
NEAR came up with an option-like airdrop mechanism: users first need to deposit assets into its privacy account to complete the trades. The rewarded tokens you receive also can’t be sold for now—you must wait until NEAR’s 3-day average price holds steady above $3.33 before you can convert them 1:1 into the real NEAR. In plain terms, the project team is using over $1 million in rewards to lock the market’s attention tightly around the $3.33 level.
As soon as the 3-day average requirement is met, the rewards unlock—so buy pressure follows right after it~
In the short term, it doubled within a week, but open interest is also shrinking, which suggests the leverage chasing the pump is being flushed out. From the mid-to-long-term perspective, if Intents trading volume can hold up, NEAR’s story can shift from a “high-performance chain” to a “privacy transaction settlement layer,” and the narrative can level up to a higher tier~
I think: with a surge this wild, there really is something substantive behind it—Intents’ weekly trading volume breaking 1 billion is genuinely real.
But after an 80% jump in a week, RSI was already overbought.
At this point, I don’t recommend everyone chase the price up. You can first watch to see after any pullback: can $3.33 hold? Are the product metrics still there?
If it holds, it’s a swap of the engine. If it doesn’t, then it’s a classic “pump to unload.” When it’s rising, everyone becomes an analyst 😂
Only when it drops and you can still hold—that’s real conviction.
What do you think about this big rally? Feel free to leave a comment in the comment section~
#NEAR一周涨近80%
Log in to explore more content