14

This guy @CRYPTO MECHANIC is still sitting at #14

Sometimes I think, why doesn't this community give us what we deserve?

VOTE CM HERE🔥

I mean, time is the only thing we can't compare with any amount of money

So when a creator is giving you his time, think about it… he deserves much more than just your likes

It's a disgrace that this level of creator is getting only 3-4K votes while the new ones are ahead of him

Remember, he was one of the old creators who shared his personal setups rather than doing marketing & chasing W/E campaigns

In this whole crowd, he isn't the one pushing you to trade. He is the one pushing you to learn the market, understand it & manage your own funds

I don't think we can give him everything he deserves but at least we can contribute our votes to show some respect

He deserves much, much more respect

Do vote for him and pay your regards 🙏

#TheBlockchain100

The story of 10,000 BTC for pizza is often told as a deal that makes people feel sorry for Laszlo.

But before the deal went through, what he worried about was, surprisingly, that he hadn’t offered enough.

On May 18, 2010, he offered 10,000 BTC on a forum in exchange for two large pizzas, and specifically said he wanted some leftovers for the next day. You could make them and bring them over, or order them from a restaurant for him—either way was fine.

By May 21, with no good news of a deal yet, he asked: Was nobody willing to buy me a pizza? Was the amount of Bitcoin I offered too small?

On May 22, he finally came back with good news: he’d successfully traded for pizza, and thanked jercos.

But the story didn’t end there. On June 12, he said that as long as he had enough funds, he’d still be willing to trade 10,000 BTC for two pizzas; if they were upgraded to extra-large, he could throw in a few more coins.

That’s why I’d rather read his posts from the time than write a regret-filled diary on his behalf.

People later thought he’d spent too much. At the time, though, he was worried he hadn’t offered enough.

The image is a Chinese-language timeline summary of the original 2010 thread, not a screenshot of the original post; dates are as displayed on the forum. Original posts #1, #8, #11, and #14:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=137.0
$BTC #CryptoStories

$BMT This 15m move isn’t particularly extreme—just 1.85%—but OI has risen alongside it: +3.91% over 15m and +3.72% over 1h. Its notional changes are also near the top, so this isn’t just spot buying pushing the price up; it looks more like new leveraged longs piling in. Volume is 2.83 times normal, and the net taker buy-sell difference is 11.2%, with buyers in control. Short-term sentiment is definitely bullish.

Its anomaly percentile is 85.7%, ranking #24 across the pool, while its notional change ranks #14—so it’s already standing out a bit in this smaller pool. 24h trading volume is 172 million, with enough depth to absorb orders. But with OI building this quickly, if the price goes flat later, these longs could become weak hands. You can chase it, but don’t crank leverage too high; this kind of setup can reverse quickly, too.

$ANIME is getting interesting. The price is up 1.47%, which isn't much, but OI is up 7.92% in an hour, with a notional change of 241K. The 15m figure is also up 2.82%. This is a classic case of new leveraged longs entering, not shorts covering. The anomaly percentile is 86.7%, ranking #14 across the entire pool, and the funding rate has also climbed to a recent high percentile. The price has just touched the range boundary. Volume is only 0.82x—leverage is piling in before volume catches up. If you're chasing longs, be careful not to be the one left holding the bag.

$JCT This sell-off is interesting—the price fell 4.32%, but OI is rising. Perpetual contract open interest is up 0.63% over 15 minutes and 0.80% over 1 hour. Combined with 3.74x volume and a volatility Z-score of 2.94, this looks more like new shorts entering than longs capitulating.

The closing price has already broken below the lows of the last 20 5-minute candles. The buy/sell ratio is 0.64, and the aggressive trade imbalance is -22.3%, with sellers clearly in control. Notional change ranks #14 across the pool, at the 62.7th percentile—depth confirms the move.

This is a sell-off structure led by newly added leveraged shorts. Keep an eye on it: if OI keeps building and the price fails to rebound, there may be more to come.

🟢 New trade on our real account: LONG $BTC @ 81418.8 · size 81 USDT (1.8 % of the account) · master #14 of 31

Market read: bearish — price below falling 20/50h averages (downtrend); RSI 36: neutral; open interest -5 %: positions unwinding.

Indicators (1h): RSI14 36, EMA20 81802.6 vs EMA50 82318.9, ATR 0.48 % per hour, 24h volume 1.14× the 3-day average, price at 13 % of the 3-day range.

Order book (Binance, ±5 %): biggest bid 81381.7 at -0.0 % with $1,482,449; biggest ask 81451.9 at +0.1 % with $1,504,824. Binance crowd: 68 % of accounts long, top traders 60 % long, open interest 24h -5.2 %, funding +0.007 %; Hyperliquid OI $3,513,128,655, 24h volume $3,561,570,632.

Our masters in $BTC : 7 long / 1 short. The entry is with the majority of Binance accounts.

Read it as a snapshot, not a forecast: the trader decided, we mirrored.

#copytrading #hyperliquid #binancefutures $BTC

For anyone copying via API, trading their own account or on Binance Copy Trading, the same trades go to our group: https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/DpuA7yYD

$ZEREBRO : This 15m move has some substance. Up 3.59%, it broke straight through the highs of the last 20 5m candles, with volume at 3.25x and the net aggressive buy flow climbing to 11.9%; the buy/sell ratio is 1.27. This isn't a fake move propped up by resting orders—someone is actually buying in.

OI is at the 92.7th percentile, ranked #14 for anomalies across the whole pool. Price rising alongside OI points structurally toward new leveraged longs entering, rather than a one-off short-covering spike. 1h OI is still down slightly, which suggests this move has only just caught fire, rather than simmering for an hour.

24h trading volume is just over 14M, so the pool isn't particularly deep. A breakout at this size can accelerate easily once momentum traders pile in, but it can also reverse just as quickly. A notional change of 128K is already significant at this depth.

First, let's see if it can hold above this level. If not, it'll just leave a long upper wick.

⚡ SPRINTING FROM RANK #14 TOWARD THE TOP 10 LEADERBOARD SPOTLIGHT! 💥

The order flow of community support is building relentless momentum right now. We have reclaimed spot #14 on the board, and the push into the coveted Top 10 tier is officially within striking distance.

📊 Every single vote carries real weight as we flip resistance levels and climb the ranks together. 💡 When a community mobilizes with this kind of coordinated force, momentum becomes an unstoppable wave.

💬 Have you cast your vote today to help seal our spot inside the Top 10? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #BinanceSquare #CommunityPower #Crypto #TradingCommunity

🔥 💎

$WLFI 15m A sudden volume spike came in, with volume reaching 2.08x and price rising 0.61%. It closed above the upper edge of the previous 20 5m candles. The buy/sell ratio was 1.17, and the aggressive trade imbalance was 7.9%, suggesting a bullish bias. Open interest barely changed over 15m and 1h, but the notional change was more notable: 939K USDT flowed in over 1h. The notional change ranked #14 across the entire pool. An anomaly percentile of 56.7% isn’t extreme, but this volume-backed breakout is worth watching in the short term to see whether it can hold.

🟢 New trade on our real account: LONG $ZEC @ 1257.4 · size 6 USDT (0.1 % of the account) · master #14 of 31

Market read: bullish — price above rising 20/50h averages (uptrend); RSI 70: overbought zone; open interest +14 % with price up: fresh longs.

Indicators (1h): RSI14 70, EMA20 1229.43 vs EMA50 1189.68, ATR 1.87 % per hour, 24h volume 1.16× the 3-day average, price at 85 % of the 3-day range.

Order book (Binance, ±5 %): biggest bid 1252.8 at -0.4 % with $519,920; biggest ask 1262.65 at +0.4 % with $521,538. Binance crowd: 37 % of accounts long, top traders 57 % long, open interest 24h +14.3 %, funding +0.003 %; Hyperliquid OI $687,276,804, 24h volume $412,784,863.

Our masters in $ZEC : 2 long / 3 short. The entry is against the majority of Binance accounts.

Read it as a snapshot, not a forecast: the trader decided, we mirrored.

#copytrading #hyperliquid #binancefutures $ZEC

For anyone copying via API, trading their own account or on Binance Copy Trading, the same trades go to our group: https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/DpuA7yYD

🔴 Master #14 added to the SHORT $BNB : 37 → 52 USDT on our side (1.1 % of the account), average entry 742.32 → 742.957.

The add came in drawdown. Our rule: adds are copied only inside legs we already hold; we never join a master's existing losing position from outside.

If you copy by API like we do, or just want these entries and exits as they happen, we keep a small group on Binance: https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/DpuA7yYD

$LSK — this drop is telling. Price moved lower, and OI contracted along with it: -1.03% over 15m, -1.27% over 1h, with notional value down by over a hundred thousand dollars. Classic sign that it’s not shorts driving the sell-off—longs are getting out first: stop-losses, deleveraging, position cuts, the whole lot.

But volume doesn’t lie: price got slammed on 2.22x volume, aggressive trade imbalance was -38.3%, and the buy/sell ratio was 0.45. The selling pressure is real. The close also broke below the lows of nearly 20 recent 5m candles, so the short-term structure has turned bearish.

The OI anomaly percentile hit 97.4%, ranking #14 across the entire pool—extreme readings that persist across multiple timeframes are usually not just noise. 24h trading volume is only 11.91M, so this is a small market. When liquidity is thin, even a little selling pressure can open up a hole.

At this level, don’t rush to buy the dip. Until the longs finish deleveraging, any rebound is likely to be an opportunity to sell into. Watch more, trade less, and wait for OI to stabilize.

$PUMP This 15m rally has something behind it: volume surged to 3.90x normal levels, and the price broke above the top of the recent 20-candle 5m range. But look closely at OI—15m contracts are down 0.33%, and 1h contracts are down 0.02%. The price is rising while positions are shrinking. This looks more like a rally driven by short covering than fresh longs entering. The taker buy-sell delta is +7.1% and the buy/sell ratio is 1.15, so the volume-price action is reasonably healthy. But the OI anomaly percentile has already reached 86.3%, and the change in notional across the whole pool ranks #14, with the trend continuing across multiple consecutive periods. 24h trading volume of 225M is no small amount, but with a rally like this, shorts may not be able to hold out. Anyone chasing longs should think carefully: short-covering rallies don't usually go far—you need to see whether anyone keeps buying once the covering is done.

🔴 New trade on our real account: SHORT $MSTR @ 144.05 · size 30 USDT (0.7 % of the account) · master #14 of 31

Market read: neutral — price above rising 20/50h averages (uptrend); RSI 74: overbought zone; open interest -4 %: positions unwinding.

Indicators (1h): RSI14 74, EMA20 141.939 vs EMA50 139.79, ATR 1.50 % per hour, 24h volume 1.34× the 3-day average, price at 78 % of the 3-day range.

Order book (Binance, ±5 %): biggest bid 143 at -0.7 % with $294,072; biggest ask 144.47 at +0.3 % with $286,273. Binance crowd: 68 % of accounts long, top traders 77 % long, open interest 24h -3.9 %, funding +0.015 %; Hyperliquid OI n/a, 24h volume n/a.

Our masters in $MSTR : 0 long / 1 short. The entry is against the majority of Binance accounts.

Read it as a snapshot, not a forecast: the trader decided, we mirrored.

#copytrading #hyperliquid #binancefutures $MSTR

For anyone copying via API, trading their own account or on Binance Copy Trading, the same trades go to our group: https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/DpuA7yYD

$USELESS 15m rose 1.57%, with volume at 1.67x. Price broke above the top of its recent 20-bar 5m range—but OI is falling. 15m futures are down 0.16%, and 1h futures are down 0.42%, while notional volume is still increasing. This combination looks more like short covering driving the price up than new longs entering. The taker buy/sell volume difference is 19.3%, and the buy/sell ratio is 1.48, so the order flow is indeed tilted toward buyers. The anomaly percentile is 87.7%, ranked #14 across the whole pool. 24h trading volume is 32M, with sufficient market depth. The key is whether this buying pressure continues or fades once the short covering is over.

$CT This 15m move up was pretty decisive. A 2% gain isn’t huge, but volume surged to 7.77x, with a Z-score of 5.08—that’s more than just random noise. OI is up 0.66% over 15m and 1.22% over 1h. Although the notional change was only around $100,000–$200,000, combined with the price rise, it looks more like new leveraged longs entering than a short squeeze. The closing price has pushed above the range of nearly 20 recent 5m candles. The taker buy/sell ratio is 1.30, and the taker volume delta is 13%, so the directional bias is fairly clear. It ranks #14 for anomalies across the entire pool and #35 for notional change. The score isn’t at the top, but volume is above normal on the depth confirmation, which provides a decent confirmation. 24h trading volume is 36.98M, and the pool isn’t very deep. Whether this breakout can hold depends on whether volume continues to follow through, so weigh the risks before chasing the move.

$HYPE This 15m move is pretty interesting: volume surged to 3.87x, the active buy/sell ratio hit 2.14, and the close broke above the high of the last 20 5m candles. OI is rising in tandem, with 1h notional up nearly 5M. Looks like new leveraged longs are entering, not just shorts covering. Anomaly percentile: 86.9%, ranked #14 across the whole pool; notional change ranked #6. It’s definitely getting more attention. 24h trading volume is 491M, and depth is decent. The only question is whether this move can hold—hopefully it won’t just wick up and reverse again.

$INJ ’s 15m drop was pretty decisive: -2.94%, with volume surging to 9.59x and a Z-score of 3.6. This isn’t normal volatility—someone is distributing in size.

The key is OI: -1.97% over 15m and -4.45% over 1h. Price down + OI down is classic one-way deleveraging—longs are stopping out or getting liquidated, not new shorts piling in. The OI anomaly percentile is 99.4%, ranking #14 across the entire pool. It’s persisted across multiple timeframes, and both depth and volume confirm it’s not noise.

The 1h notional change is still positive at +0.58%, which suggests positions are changing hands, but the 15m notional change of -802K USDT is genuine position closure. The taker buy/sell ratio of 1.08 leans toward buyers, but the price couldn’t hold, suggesting sell orders were absorbed by resting bids—not aggressive panic selling.

24h trading volume is 85.6M, so the pool isn’t particularly shallow. Deleveraging of this magnitude probably isn’t over yet. This may be the tail end of a long squeeze—don’t rush to buy the dip.

$BR This 1.24% drop over 15m isn’t that big, but the OI makes it interesting—15m contract OI is down 1.78%, with 780K U in notional value unwound. This is typical of longs collectively letting go during a narrow-range decline, with stop-losses and position reductions happening together. 1h OI is still slightly positive, suggesting this isn’t a full-scale retreat, but more like short-term leverage being flushed out.

The active trade imbalance is -5.6%, and the buy/sell ratio is 0.89. Selling pressure isn’t extreme, but it’s persistent. The anomaly percentile is 92.5%, ranking #14 across the entire pool, while the notional change ranks #8. It’s been in this state for several consecutive periods, so this wasn’t caused by a single wick.

24h trading volume is over 500 million, so liquidity is sufficient. This structure looks more like a leverage flush than a trend collapse. Watch whether OI can stabilize; if it keeps falling, there may be more room to move lower.