bitgetdetailssecurityincidenttimeline

#bitgetdetailssecurityincidenttimeline
🚨 BITGET JUST REVEALED THE FULL SECURITY INCIDENT TIMELINE.
On September 24, Bitget detected unauthorized transfers from part of its hot and warm wallet infrastructure. The estimated affected amount was later revised from $351.6M to $387.5M after additional transactions were identified.
⏰ 18:31 UTC: Unauthorized transfers detected
🛑 Same day: Withdrawals temporarily suspended
🔍 Sept. 25: Attack path identified and vulnerability fixed
💰 $387.5M: Revised total affected amount
🛡️ Cold wallets: Not affected
🏦 Protection Fund: Over $464M
📅 Sept. 28: BTC withdrawals scheduled to begin returning in phases
Bitget says the incident is contained, user account balances remain unaffected, and Mandiant + SlowMist are assisting with the investigation.
🔥 Now the big question:
Will Bitget's phased withdrawal restart restore confidence — or will traders remain cautious? 👀
#Bitget #crypto #security

#bitgetdetailssecurityincidenttimeline Bitget
Loses $351.6M in the Largest Crypto Hack of 2026

BITGET
confirmed that attackers drained ~$351.6M from its hot and warm wallets on September 24 in 19 transfers across Ethereum, XRP Ledger, Avalanche, BNB Chain and Arbitrum. The stolen assets include ETH, XRP, USDT, USDC, AVAX, and BNB, and $170M+ has already been swapped into ETH.

According to CEO Gracy Chen, no private keys were stolen. The attacker broke into a backend system in the wallet infrastructure, faked transaction data and got Bitget's own authorization process to approve the transfers.

It's the same pattern as Bybit last year: attackers go after the signing process instead of the keys. Bitget says it suspects North Korean hackers. For users: the $464M+ User Protection Fund covers the full loss, and Bitget has $1B+ in its own capital on top.$ALGO $SOXS $SOON

#BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline
Bitget reported a major security incident involving unauthorized transfers from its hot and warm wallets on September 24. The affected amount was updated to $387.5 million, though Bitget says cold wallets and user account balances were not impacted.

Withdrawals were paused, the vulnerability was reportedly fixed by September 25, and BTC withdrawals were planned to resume gradually from September 28. Bitget also says its Protection Fund exceeds $464 million and that external security firms are helping investigate.
$BTC

#bitgetdetailssecurityincidenttimeline Bitget hit by a $351.6M security
breach :

-
Bitget
says attackers made unauthorized transfers from parts of its hot and warm wallets on September 24.

- Onchain researchers initially spotted around $180M+ moving across multiple chains before
Bitget
confirmed the larger $351.6M figure.

- Bitget has paused withdrawals while investigating, Trading and deposits remain operational.

- CEO Gracy Chen says the company’s $464M+ User Protection Fund covers the estimated loss and that customer balances remain protected.

- The attack vector has not yet been disclosed, Bitget says a full incident report with the root cause is expected within 24 hours.$ZEST $QNT $HBAR

#bitgetdetailssecurityincidenttimeline Bitget Reopens BTC Withdrawals After September 24 Security Incident

Bitget said it has begun a phased resumption of withdrawals following the September 24 security incident, with BTC withdrawals on the Bitcoin network reopening at 08:00 UTC on September 28. The exchange said the vulnerability has been remediated, no further unauthorized transfers have been identified since containment, and user account balances remain unaffected. Bitget CEO Gracy Chen previously said the company would replenish the Protection Fund back to its $300 million baseline within a week.$AZTEC $ONE $SKDD

#bitgetdetailssecurityincidenttimeline
🚨 BREAKING: Bitget Releases Full Incident Timeline for $387.5M Exploit 🛡️
Crypto exchange Bitget has detailed the complete timeline regarding its recent security breach. While the initial loss estimate sat at $351.6M, on-chain tracing across additional chains (including Zcash and TRON) revised the final total to $387.5 Million.

Here is how the events unfolded and where things stand as phased withdrawals begin! ⏰

⏳ Detailed Incident Timeline
⏰ 18:31 UTC: Unauthorized transfers detected
🛑 Same day: Withdrawals temporarily suspended
🔍 Sept. 25: Attack path identified and vulnerability fixed
💰 $387.5M: Revised total affected amount
🛡️ Cold wallets: Not affected
🏦 Protection Fund: Over $464M
📅 Sept. 28: BTC withdrawals scheduled to begin returning in phases

🛡️ Why Platform Solvency Remains Intact
Operational LayerCurrent StatusImpact LevelCold Wallets100% Safe — Completely air-gapped from backend exploitZero Direct ExposureUser Balances100% Covered — Accounting balances remain accurateFully ProtectedProtection FundHolds $464M+, fully absorbing the $387.5M lossLoss Absorbed
💭 Market Sentiment: Trust Test Ahead
While Bitget CEO Gracy Chen confirmed the $464M Protection Fund comfortably covers all financial damages, the market remains divided:
$NVDA.US
The Bull Case for Trust: Bitget acted transparently, deployed a backstopped treasury fund, retained 100% solvency without liquidating user collateral, and kept trading pairs online.
$ZEC
The Cautionary View: Phased withdrawals often trigger temporary capital flight as risk-averse traders migrate assets to cold storage or competitor exchanges to wait out volatility.

🔥#KospiFalls2.7%SamsungSKHynixDropOver5% #BitgetWallet #crypto

#bitgetdetailssecurityincidenttimeline

Bitget has released official $387.5M security timeline — Biggest CEX incident of 2026.

TIMELINE VERIFIED:

Sep 24, 18:31 UTC — Unauthorized transfers detected from hot & warm wallets. 19 txs flagged.

Sep 24, 21:30 UTC — Withdrawals paused. Initial loss $351.6M.

Sep 25 — Root cause found: Backend system compromised via third-party vulnerability. Attacker spoofed data, auth system signed fake txs. Private keys SAFE — Not stolen.

$387.5M Final — Revised after tracing ZEC + TRON chains. Cold wallets 100% SAFE.

Protection Fund: $464M+ — Will cover all losses. User funds SAFU.

Sep 28, 08:00 UTC — BTC withdrawals resume in phases, then ETH, USDT.

Affected: 103M $XRP (~$157M), $ETH $USDT $ZEC $TRX $BNB $AVAX $USDC.

Mandiant (Google) + SlowMist investigating. Early attribution to North Korea VPN patterns.

This was NOT a key leak — It was auth exploit. Market held strong because fund > hack. Bullish for CEX security confidence.

Will you keep trading on Bitget after this?

$BGB XRP $BTC ETH

#Bitget #BGB #XRP #BTC #crypto#BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline

#bitgetdetailssecurityincidenttimeline Bitget has confirmed that around $387.5M was transferred to attacker-controlled addresses during the Sept. 24 security incident
revised up from the initial $351.6M estimate.

BITGET exchange says
🛡️

• Cold wallets were unaffected
• The
incident
is contained
• Some affected assets have already been frozen
• Its User Protection Fund held $464M+ at the time of the incident
• A 5% recovery/freeze bounty has been launched$NMR $MARSCOIN $AIOT

#bitgetdetailssecurityincidenttimeline Bitget
CEO: $350M Hack Very Likely Linked to North Korea

On September 24,
Bitget detected unauthorized transfers from several hot wallets. Bitget CEO Gracie Chen @GracyBitget said the team identified IP addresses whose VPN usage patterns matched those associated with a specific DPRK-linked group, making a North Korea connection “very likely.” She added that the attackers did not obtain private keys for Bitget’s hot, warm or cold wallets, but instead breached the exchange’s internal system and transferred funds directly. Bitget has previously said its user protection fund exceeds $464 million, which it says is sufficient to cover the loss.$STAR $BRETT $ZHONGJI

#bitgetdetailssecurityincidenttimeline Bitget confirms a $351M security
breach

BITGTE says unauthorized transfers drained about $351.6M from a limited number of its hot wallets today, first detected at 18:31
UTC. The exchange says its cold wallets are untouched and user balances remain accurate.

Withdrawals are paused during a security review, while deposits and trading continue. Bitget says its User Protection Fund, which holds over $464M, covers the losses.$VVV $PTB $JCT

#BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline
🚨 Bitget Security Incident: What Happened? 🔐💰

Sept. 24: Unauthorized crypto transfers reported.

🔓 Third-party security vulnerability allegedly enabled high-level internal access
💰 Initial loss: ~$351.6M
📊 Revised loss: ~$387.5–$388M
🛠️ Vulnerability patched & transfers stopped
❄️ Bitget says cold-wallet keys were not compromised
🛡️ Protection fund planned to cover losses

Sept. 28: 🚪 Withdrawals reportedly began reopening in phases, starting with BTC.

🇰🇵 Public reports have linked the activity to North Korea-associated actors, but attribution remains under investigation.

📌 Key lesson: Exchange security isn't only about private keys. Internal access controls, third-party systems, and transaction-approval workflows can also create major risks.

#Bitget #CryptoSecurity #Crypto #Bitcoin

#BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline

Yes. Bitget’s major security incident happened on September 24, 2026, and today, September 28, Bitget has started restoring withdrawals in phases.
Bitget security incident — timeline
Date / Time (UTC)
Event
Sep 24 — 18:31
Bitget detected unauthorized transfers from parts of its hot/warm wallet infrastructure across multiple networks.
Bitget +1
Sep 24
Withdrawals were suspended while Bitget contained the incident. Trading and deposits continued.
Bitget
Initial estimate
About $351.6M in assets affected.
Sep 25
Investigation identified the attack path and the vulnerability was remediated.
Bitget
Sep 25
After additional on-chain classification, the affected amount was revised to approximately $387.5M. This did not represent additional theft.
Bitget
Sep 26–27
Bitget conducted security validation with Mandiant and SlowMist and announced a phased withdrawal plan.
Bitget
Sep 28 — 08:00 UTC
BTC withdrawals resumed on the Bitcoin network.
Bitget +1
Sep 28 — today
Bitget says the incident remains contained and no further unauthorized transfers have been identified.
LinkedIn
What was actually compromised?
According to Bitget's latest explanation, the attacker exploited a vulnerability in a third-party security product, obtained high-level internal credentials, and used them to send fraudulent withdrawal commands that bypassed existing risk controls. Bitget says private keys were not compromised and cold wallets were not affected.
Bitget
Today's withdrawal schedule
🟢 Sep 28, 08:00 UTC: BTC — resumed
🟡 Sep 29, 08:00 UTC: ETH — Ethereum, BSC, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism
🟡 Sep 30, 08:00 UTC: USDT — Ethereum, BSC, Solana, Tron
🟡 Oct 2, 08:00 UTC: Other tokens, fiat withdrawals and P2P
Bitget
Important: Bitget says its User Protection Fund will cover the financial impact, and it currently reports that user account balances were unaffected.
Bitget +1
There are also reports today that the stolen funds are still being moved/swapped through THORChain, so the recovery/tracing operation is still active.

🚨 $388M Crypto Security Incident

A major security issue involving Bitget has raised concerns after nearly $388M worth of transferred assets came under scrutiny.

Bitget says the vulnerability has now been resolved, with additional unauthorized transfers reportedly no longer possible.

This incident once again highlights how important security and risk management are in the crypto industry. 🔐

$BTC $ETH $BNB
#QNTFallsOver40%FromMorningHigh #BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline #FedProposesPaymentStablecoinRules #ChinaMayLetAlibabaByteDanceBuyNvidiaChips #SKoreaFSCConsidersVirtualAssetMarketMaker

#BitgetCEOConfirms$388MStolenInHack

🚨 Bitget CEO Confirms $388M Stolen in Major Hack: Protection Fund to Fully Cover Losses 🛡️💥

Bitget CEO Gracy Chen has officially clarified that the recent exchange exploit resulted in approximately $387.5 million to $388 million in stolen digital assets—up from initial lower estimates.

The breach occurred after attackers compromised a critical backend system and manipulated transaction data, tricking internal systems into approving unauthorized transfers across multiple blockchains (including XRP Ledger, TRON, and Zcash). Investigators have linked the IP patterns and on-chain signatures to DPRK-affiliated hacking groups.

📰 Key Takeaways & Official Response:
Full Fund Guarantee: Bitget confirmed that its $464M+ Protection Fund will fully absorb the loss, ensuring user account balances remain safe and backed 1:1.

Recovery Operations: Bitget is collaborating with law enforcement, on-chain analytics teams, and cross-chain protocols like THORChain to track and freeze exploited wallet addresses.

System Hardening: Backend signing modules are undergoing comprehensive security revamps to prevent future spoofing vulnerabilities.

📍#BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline #BitgetToken

#BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline
🚨 Bitget Security Incident Update: What You Need to Know 🚨
Bitget has officially released the detailed timeline regarding the recent $387.5 million hot wallet exploit that happened on September 24–25. Here are the quick facts to keep you informed:
📅 Withdrawal Reopening Schedule:
1.Sept 28 (Today): Native Bitcoin ($BTC ) withdrawals are resuming.
2.$ETH , $BSCZ.ETF , Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism networks.
3.USDT (across Ethereum, Solana, BSC, Tron)
4.Oct 2: All other altcoins and P2P trading.

🚨 Bitget Got Hit! What Now? 🚨
#BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline shows hackers used a third-party security flaw to fake withdrawal requests from hot wallets. No private keys leaked, but $388M went poof! 💸
What should traders do?
🧘‍♂️ Breathe.
📉 Don't panic-sell everything.
⏳ Wait for BTC/ETH withdrawals to fully reopen this week.
🔒 Double-check your own API keys.
⚠️ This is not financial advice!
Want a safer ride? Join Binance!
👉 Use my Code: VINHTOCDO
👉 Link: binance.com
Click the trading widgets below to support me! 👇
$BTC
$ETH
$XRP
#CryptoSecurity #bitgethack #Web3 #BinanceSquare #VINHTOCDO #TradingTips

#BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline

Bitget has published a timeline of its September 24 security incident. According to Bitget, unauthorized transfers were detected at 18:31 UTC, after which its emergency response was activated and withdrawals were temporarily suspended.

Sept. 24: Unauthorized transfers detected; withdrawals paused while trading and deposits remained available.

Initial estimate: About $351.6M in affected assets.

Sept. 25: Bitget said the attack path and underlying vulnerability had been identified and remediated. Further on-chain classification revised the affected amount to about $387.5M.

Investigation: Mandiant and SlowMist are assisting with forensic investigation and fund tracing.

Sept. 26: Bitget announced a phased withdrawal-restoration plan.

Sept. 28 onward: Withdrawals are scheduled to resume progressively, beginning with BTC, followed by ETH, USDT, and other assets.

Bitget says its cold wallets were not affected and that the financial impact is covered by its User Protection Fund. The company also says the incident remains contained while recovery and investigation efforts continue.

Discussion: The key focus now is transparency around the attack path, the effectiveness of the security fixes, the recovery of affected assets, and whether the phased withdrawal process proceeds without further issues.

#bitgetdetailssecurityincidenttimeline
🚨 كِشفت Bitget للتو عن الجدول الزمني الكامل لحادثة الأمان.
في 24 سبتمبر، اكتشفت Bitget عمليات تحويل غير مصرح بها من جزء من البنية التحتية لمحافظها الساخنة والدافئة. تم لاحقًا تعديل المبلغ التقديري المتأثر من 351.6 مليون دولار إلى 387.5 مليون دولار بعد تحديد معاملات إضافية.
⏰ 18:31 بالتوقيت العالمي: تم اكتشاف تحويلات غير مصرح بها
🛑 نفس اليوم: تم تعليق السحوبات مؤقتًا
🔍 25 سبتمبر: تم تحديد مسار الهجوم وإصلاح الثغرة
💰 387.5 مليون دولار: إجمالي المبلغ المتأثر بعد المراجعة
🛡️ المحافظ الباردة: لم تتأثر
🏦 صندوق الحماية: أكثر من 464 مليون دولار
📅 28 سبتمبر: من المقرر أن تبدأ عودة سحوبات BTC تدريجيًا
تقول Bitget إن الحادثة تم احتواؤها، وأن أرصدة حسابات المستخدمين لم تتأثر، وأن Mandiant + SlowMist يساعدان في التحقيق.
🔥 السؤال الكبير الآن:
هل سيؤدي استئناف السحوبات على مراحل إلى استعادة الثقة — أم سيظل المتداولون حذرين؟ 👀

متابعة من فضلكم

#Bitget #crypto #security

Bitget时间线仍在广场热榜｜使用追赃平台不等于确认攻击者｜ETH在2664美元附近我先等

我的态度是先分清证据，不凭追赃平台名字给攻击者定性，也不因此追多或追空ETH。币安广场#BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline有45人讨论；首页标签切换，不能跨标签比较讨论数称热度加速。

一手事实来自Bitget更新的官方事件说明：平台使用Bybit的LazarusBounty作为资产追回渠道之一，同时明确表示，独立取证调查尚在进行，对未经正式验证的发现不应当作确定结论，调查期间不对攻击者归因作猜测。详细发现还要通过正式安全报告披露。工具名称与事件归因是两类信息，不能只凭名字写成“已经确认某组织所为”。

我交叉核对Bybit官方帮助中心。它将LazarusBounty解释为帮助识别和冻结非法资金的奖励计划，并明确区别于报告平台漏洞的Bug Bounty。这份说明更新于2025年，不是今天新发布的调查结果；它能帮助理解工具用途，不能替代这次事件的取证证据。我也核对Bitget9月25日安全更新，其调查与资金追踪仍在持续。

为什么影响交易？错误归因可能把平台托管事件扩写成所有链都面临同样的威胁。但不知道攻击者是谁，也不能忽略已确认的资金与通道风险。我先核对资产位置、必要权限和退出路径，再决定是否增加风险，不必先猜名字。

对ETH要分开看。官方受影响资产包含ETH，不等于以太坊共识被攻破。采用追回渠道，也未证明冻结资金全部返回用户，不能算成新增买盘。我等正式报告与恢复状态，不用未证实归因给反弹背书，也不把追踪工作当成流动性修复。

市场已经如何表现？复查Kraken的ETH/USD约2664.20美元，滚动24小时2635.57至2716.32，离开低点但未到我的确认门槛，不能归因于安全话题。2670是参与条件，2630是入场前取消线，并非保证有效的支撑阻力；正式报告改变风险判断或渠道异常，价格满足也不参与。

如果是我自己交易，现在不参与，仓位为零，不做空、不加杠杆。只有小时线收在2670美元上方，回踩2665至2670守住，且报价与实际使用的充提通道正常，才用总资金最多0.3%试多现货。2690美元减半，2710美元平掉余仓；入场后触及2648美元硬止损，或连续两根小时收在2665下方，剩余全部平仓。入场前跌破2630，撤销计划，不摊平亏损。尚未触发的安排不是成交，更不能写成盈利。

来源：Bitget官方事件说明及9月25日安全更新；Bybit官方LazarusBounty问答；Kraken行情。
#BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline #ETH
以上仅为个人市场观察，不构成投资建议。

Bitget时间线仍在广场热榜｜公开ZEC地址不等于隐私协议被破解｜1588美元附近我先等

我的态度：不把托管事故偷换成协议失效，不追涨。广场安全时间线话题249次浏览、45人讨论，与前轮相同；ZEC在六小时搜索名单，但无快速上升标记。热度不是买盘凭证。

已核实事实：Bitget九月二十五日官方更新列出以t1开头的ZEC涉案接收地址，确认受影响资产包括ZEC。调查和追踪仍在继续；九月二十七日说明的更新版也列出Zcash网络，事件范围是部分交易所热、温钱包基础设施。这不是今天再次遇袭，更不是已公布全网密码学漏洞。

Zcash官方说明和技术词汇表解释：以t开头的透明地址，其地址和相关金额公开记录在链上。屏蔽交易保护相应隐私数据，混合交易不能笼统说全部隐藏。这是既有机制，不是今天新增功能；一个接收地址不是完整追赃结论。

为什么影响市场？这是我的判断：如果把“公布了ZEC地址”理解成“隐私技术已失效”，就容易用错误理由恐慌卖出；反过来，把“币名带隐私”理解成“每笔转账天然不可见”，也会低估信息暴露。公开一段透明记录，既不能证明全部资金路径已查清，也不能证明屏蔽机制遭破解。托管权限、交易隐私和交易所提现能力，需要分别核验；隐私不替代账户安全。

市场实际报价方面，Kraken ZEC/USD复核1588.40美元，二十四小时区间1536.24至1678.70。价格离低点有所回升，但报价仍低于我设定的1595确认线；报价变化不能证明是这份旧公告带来的反应。我不编造机构流入，也不把其他币种恢复提现写成ZEC已经恢复。

如果是我自己交易，目前不参与，仓位0%，不做空，只考虑无杠杆现货条件试多。小时收盘站上1595，再回踩1590至1595守住，且所用平台报价及充提正常，才以总资金最多0.3%参与；1610减半，1630平余仓。入场后1575硬止损，或连续两根小时收盘低于1590全部退出；入场前先破1550就撤单，不补仓。有效收复确认线会推翻暂不参与判断；若正式技术报告证实协议级问题，或交易通道异常，即使突破也取消计划。未触发不算成交，更不算盈利。

来源：[Bitget更新](https://www.bitget.com/support/articles/12560603896108)、[Zcash透明与屏蔽说明](https://z.cash/learn/what-is-the-difference-between-shielded-and-transparent-zcash/)、[技术词汇表](https://zcash.readthedocs.io/en/latest/rtd_pages/glossary.html)；行情Kraken。
#BitgetDetailsSecurityIncidentTimeline #ZEC
以上仅为个人市场观察，不构成投资建议。