#starknet
starknet
940,163 views
2,332 Discussing
Hot
Latest
📉 $STRK (Starknet) Latest Analysis
$STRK is facing selling pressure after its recent rally. The price has pulled back, and buyers need to regain momentum before a stronger recovery can begin.
🟢 Support: $0.047
🔴 Resistance: $0.0505–$0.057
If support holds, a bounce is possible. But a break below $0.047 could bring further downside. Watch for confirmation before entering. 🛡️
What’s your take on STRK — recovery or more downside? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Manage your risk.
#STRK #Starknet #CryptoAnalysis #BinanceSquare
{spot}(STRKUSDT)
📉 $STRK (Starknet) Latest Analysis
$STRK is facing selling pressure after its recent rally. The price has pulled back, and buyers need to regain momentum before a stronger recovery can begin.
🟢 Support: $0.047
🔴 Resistance: $0.0505–$0.057
If support holds, a bounce is possible. But a break below $0.047 could bring further downside. Watch for confirmation before entering. 🛡️
What’s your take on STRK — recovery or more downside? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Manage your risk.
#STRK #Starknet #CryptoAnalysis #BinanceSquare
$STRK is facing selling pressure after its recent rally. The price has pulled back, and buyers need to regain momentum before a stronger recovery can begin.
🟢 Support: $0.047
🔴 Resistance: $0.0505–$0.057
If support holds, a bounce is possible. But a break below $0.047 could bring further downside. Watch for confirmation before entering. 🛡️
What’s your take on STRK — recovery or more downside? 👇
⚠️ Not financial advice. Manage your risk.
#STRK #Starknet #CryptoAnalysis #BinanceSquare
Anuskhan82:
aslamo alaikum
ap kis project py work krty hn ??
2
7
793
·
--
Verified
I want to ask everyone in the community: when you hear things like quantum computing and cryptography, can you understand them?
—Honestly, as someone with a humanities background, I find it pretty difficult. But now I get it!
A while ago, #Starknet started researching an independent L1, and one of the topics under discussion was resistance to quantum computing. I didn’t understand at the time—why was Starknet researching this?
Last night, I specifically asked a guy with a STEM background to explain it to me. Here’s how he put it:
Right now, your password is still your password, and it’s secure. But in the future, that might no longer be the case.
If quantum computers become powerful enough in the future, they could threaten some of the cryptographic algorithms we use today. When that happens, the security of wallets and blockchain assets could be at risk, so we may need to upgrade.
For example, a seed phrase uses a fixed list of 2,048 words. A 12-word phrase has around 5.44×10395.44×1039 possible combinations.
The seed phrases we use are selected from this list. If quantum computing advances to a certain point, it may be possible to break some of the cryptographic algorithms used by blockchains.
One example is elliptic curve digital signatures. Simply put, if this system is broken by a sufficiently powerful quantum computer in the future, our on-chain assets could be at risk.
So, #Starknet researching quantum-resistant security in advance doesn’t mean wallets are unsafe now. It means researching solutions before the problem actually arises.
The #Starknet community once held a vote on launching related research, and the proposal received 93.52% of the votes. This shows that the community strongly supports researching quantum-resistant security ahead of time.
I used to think quantum computing and cryptography were far removed from my life. Now I realize they could affect the assets in our wallets.
Next article:
Everyone changes their own #Starknet door lock!
My Twitter account: @erjie22. You’re welcome to visit.
I want to ask everyone in the community: when you hear things like quantum computing and cryptography, can you understand them?
—Honestly, as someone with a humanities background, I find it pretty difficult. But now I get it!
A while ago, #Starknet started researching an independent L1, and one of the topics under discussion was resistance to quantum computing. I didn’t understand at the time—why was Starknet researching this?
Last night, I specifically asked a guy with a STEM background to explain it to me. Here’s how he put it:
Right now, your password is still your password, and it’s secure. But in the future, that might no longer be the case.
If quantum computers become powerful enough in the future, they could threaten some of the cryptographic algorithms we use today. When that happens, the security of wallets and blockchain assets could be at risk, so we may need to upgrade.
For example, a seed phrase uses a fixed list of 2,048 words. A 12-word phrase has around 5.44×10395.44×1039 possible combinations.
The seed phrases we use are selected from this list. If quantum computing advances to a certain point, it may be possible to break some of the cryptographic algorithms used by blockchains.
One example is elliptic curve digital signatures. Simply put, if this system is broken by a sufficiently powerful quantum computer in the future, our on-chain assets could be at risk.
So, #Starknet researching quantum-resistant security in advance doesn’t mean wallets are unsafe now. It means researching solutions before the problem actually arises.
The #Starknet community once held a vote on launching related research, and the proposal received 93.52% of the votes. This shows that the community strongly supports researching quantum-resistant security ahead of time.
I used to think quantum computing and cryptography were far removed from my life. Now I realize they could affect the assets in our wallets.
Next article:
Everyone changes their own #Starknet door lock!
My Twitter account: @erjie22. You’re welcome to visit.
—Honestly, as someone with a humanities background, I find it pretty difficult. But now I get it!
A while ago, #Starknet started researching an independent L1, and one of the topics under discussion was resistance to quantum computing. I didn’t understand at the time—why was Starknet researching this?
Last night, I specifically asked a guy with a STEM background to explain it to me. Here’s how he put it:
Right now, your password is still your password, and it’s secure. But in the future, that might no longer be the case.
If quantum computers become powerful enough in the future, they could threaten some of the cryptographic algorithms we use today. When that happens, the security of wallets and blockchain assets could be at risk, so we may need to upgrade.
For example, a seed phrase uses a fixed list of 2,048 words. A 12-word phrase has around 5.44×10395.44×1039 possible combinations.
The seed phrases we use are selected from this list. If quantum computing advances to a certain point, it may be possible to break some of the cryptographic algorithms used by blockchains.
One example is elliptic curve digital signatures. Simply put, if this system is broken by a sufficiently powerful quantum computer in the future, our on-chain assets could be at risk.
So, #Starknet researching quantum-resistant security in advance doesn’t mean wallets are unsafe now. It means researching solutions before the problem actually arises.
The #Starknet community once held a vote on launching related research, and the proposal received 93.52% of the votes. This shows that the community strongly supports researching quantum-resistant security ahead of time.
I used to think quantum computing and cryptography were far removed from my life. Now I realize they could affect the assets in our wallets.
Next article:
Everyone changes their own #Starknet door lock!
My Twitter account: @erjie22. You’re welcome to visit.
1
717
That Starknet vote on “whether to research building an independent, quantum-resistant L1” got 93.52% support, and a bunch of accounts spun it into “the community is firmly behind it.” Honestly, it’d be stranger if a vote like this had any opposition.
First, let’s be clear about what it was: a non-binding Snapshot vote asking “should we research this?”—not “should we leave?” The team can do the research on its own; there’s no need for a vote. So why hold one? Because the vote itself is content, and it can trend. STRK was the most-searched coin on CryptoRank that week, and its price jumped by double digits after the vote. Mission accomplished.
Now look at the numbers: 3,236 votes, with 489.3 million STRK voting power. That’s about 150,000 tokens per vote on average. This isn’t “the community”—it’s whales and institutional wallets voting for their own positions. Of course token holders want an L1. Put bluntly, an L2 token is just a governance voucher; turn it into an L1 and you can talk about gas fees, staking, and security budgets, and switch to a whole new valuation model. Who would vote against their own token going up in price?
“Quantum resistance” is the most convenient cover story this time around. Quantum computing is a real issue, but it affects the whole industry; Ethereum is also researching quantum resistance. Using it as a reason to break away from Ethereum looks more like a new narrative to lean on now that L2 revenue can’t support the valuation. The original fundraising pitch was Ethereum scaling; now it’s independent sovereignty. The narrative follows the token price.
They say a white paper draft is due in November. When it comes out, I’ll be looking at just three things: where the validators will come from, how the security budget will be funded, and how the inflation of existing STRK will change. If they can’t answer those three questions, 93% is just the conversion rate of a marketing campaign.
#Starknet #STRK
That Starknet vote on “whether to research building an independent, quantum-resistant L1” got 93.52% support, and a bunch of accounts spun it into “the community is firmly behind it.” Honestly, it’d be stranger if a vote like this had any opposition.
First, let’s be clear about what it was: a non-binding Snapshot vote asking “should we research this?”—not “should we leave?” The team can do the research on its own; there’s no need for a vote. So why hold one? Because the vote itself is content, and it can trend. STRK was the most-searched coin on CryptoRank that week, and its price jumped by double digits after the vote. Mission accomplished.
Now look at the numbers: 3,236 votes, with 489.3 million STRK voting power. That’s about 150,000 tokens per vote on average. This isn’t “the community”—it’s whales and institutional wallets voting for their own positions. Of course token holders want an L1. Put bluntly, an L2 token is just a governance voucher; turn it into an L1 and you can talk about gas fees, staking, and security budgets, and switch to a whole new valuation model. Who would vote against their own token going up in price?
“Quantum resistance” is the most convenient cover story this time around. Quantum computing is a real issue, but it affects the whole industry; Ethereum is also researching quantum resistance. Using it as a reason to break away from Ethereum looks more like a new narrative to lean on now that L2 revenue can’t support the valuation. The original fundraising pitch was Ethereum scaling; now it’s independent sovereignty. The narrative follows the token price.
They say a white paper draft is due in November. When it comes out, I’ll be looking at just three things: where the validators will come from, how the security budget will be funded, and how the inflation of existing STRK will change. If they can’t answer those three questions, 93% is just the conversion rate of a marketing campaign.
#Starknet #STRK
First, let’s be clear about what it was: a non-binding Snapshot vote asking “should we research this?”—not “should we leave?” The team can do the research on its own; there’s no need for a vote. So why hold one? Because the vote itself is content, and it can trend. STRK was the most-searched coin on CryptoRank that week, and its price jumped by double digits after the vote. Mission accomplished.
Now look at the numbers: 3,236 votes, with 489.3 million STRK voting power. That’s about 150,000 tokens per vote on average. This isn’t “the community”—it’s whales and institutional wallets voting for their own positions. Of course token holders want an L1. Put bluntly, an L2 token is just a governance voucher; turn it into an L1 and you can talk about gas fees, staking, and security budgets, and switch to a whole new valuation model. Who would vote against their own token going up in price?
“Quantum resistance” is the most convenient cover story this time around. Quantum computing is a real issue, but it affects the whole industry; Ethereum is also researching quantum resistance. Using it as a reason to break away from Ethereum looks more like a new narrative to lean on now that L2 revenue can’t support the valuation. The original fundraising pitch was Ethereum scaling; now it’s independent sovereignty. The narrative follows the token price.
They say a white paper draft is due in November. When it comes out, I’ll be looking at just three things: where the validators will come from, how the security budget will be funded, and how the inflation of existing STRK will change. If they can’t answer those three questions, 93% is just the conversion rate of a marketing campaign.
#Starknet #STRK
204
·
--
$STRK : WHO CONTROLS THE NEXT MOVE?
The battle between buyers and sellers is what makes Starknet interesting to watch.
🐂 THE BULL CASE
• Buyers defend support.
• Spot volume expands during upward moves.
• Resistance breaks and holds on a retest..
🐋 WHAT ABOUT WHALES?
Open interest and liquidation data can help identify leverage risk, but wallet flows and actual transaction evidence are needed to assess whale accumulation.
🎯 My strategy: Let price confirm the direction instead of predicting the winner too early.
STRK traders: Are you watching a breakout or a breakdown?
#STRKToken #Starknet #CryptoAnalysis #BullsVsBears
$STRK : WHO CONTROLS THE NEXT MOVE?
The battle between buyers and sellers is what makes Starknet interesting to watch.
🐂 THE BULL CASE
• Buyers defend support.
• Spot volume expands during upward moves.
• Resistance breaks and holds on a retest..
🐋 WHAT ABOUT WHALES?
Open interest and liquidation data can help identify leverage risk, but wallet flows and actual transaction evidence are needed to assess whale accumulation.
🎯 My strategy: Let price confirm the direction instead of predicting the winner too early.
STRK traders: Are you watching a breakout or a breakdown?
#STRKToken #Starknet #CryptoAnalysis #BullsVsBears
The battle between buyers and sellers is what makes Starknet interesting to watch.
🐂 THE BULL CASE
• Buyers defend support.
• Spot volume expands during upward moves.
• Resistance breaks and holds on a retest..
🐋 WHAT ABOUT WHALES?
Open interest and liquidation data can help identify leverage risk, but wallet flows and actual transaction evidence are needed to assess whale accumulation.
🎯 My strategy: Let price confirm the direction instead of predicting the winner too early.
STRK traders: Are you watching a breakout or a breakdown?
#STRKToken #Starknet #CryptoAnalysis #BullsVsBears
147
·
--
Verified
【Market Update】The vote passed—does that mean Starknet is about to leave Ethereum and go it alone? Not quite: this was a non-binding poll that only authorized the launch of a study. Independence would require another vote. The motivation is quantum security: STARK proofs are quantum-resistant, but the bridge still depends on Ethereum, whose target for a quantum-resistant L1 is December 2029. STRK will remain unchanged, with no new tokens issued. Is independence the way forward, or is it safer to stay on Ethereum? Share your thoughts in the comments.
$STRK $ETH $BTC
#Starknet #以太坊 #QuantumSecurity
(Source: TheNewsCrypto)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for market information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; please exercise caution.
【Market Update】The vote passed—does that mean Starknet is about to leave Ethereum and go it alone? Not quite: this was a non-binding poll that only authorized the launch of a study. Independence would require another vote. The motivation is quantum security: STARK proofs are quantum-resistant, but the bridge still depends on Ethereum, whose target for a quantum-resistant L1 is December 2029. STRK will remain unchanged, with no new tokens issued. Is independence the way forward, or is it safer to stay on Ethereum? Share your thoughts in the comments.
$STRK $ETH $BTC
#Starknet #以太坊 #QuantumSecurity
(Source: TheNewsCrypto)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for market information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; please exercise caution.
$STRK $ETH $BTC
#Starknet #以太坊 #QuantumSecurity
(Source: TheNewsCrypto)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for market information purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; please exercise caution.
684
·
--
#STARKNET The proposal to transition to an independent L1 passed with 93% support, but the positive news came alongside a major setback. Extended, a leading perpetuals platform, migrated to the Arc chain, taking $120 million in TVL with it. This directly caused Starknet’s TVL to plunge 73% and stablecoin liquidity to shrink sharply. #strk had doubled earlier on expectations of an L1, but is now facing heavy profit-taking, falling 58% and wiping out all of this month’s gains. It dropped another 7% on the 22nd, with momentum weakening. The project will allocate funds to research the L1 transition, but in the short term, #defi ecosystem has been severely weakened.
#STARKNET The proposal to transition to an independent L1 passed with 93% support, but the positive news came alongside a major setback. Extended, a leading perpetuals platform, migrated to the Arc chain, taking $120 million in TVL with it. This directly caused Starknet’s TVL to plunge 73% and stablecoin liquidity to shrink sharply. #strk had doubled earlier on expectations of an L1, but is now facing heavy profit-taking, falling 58% and wiping out all of this month’s gains. It dropped another 7% on the 22nd, with momentum weakening. The project will allocate funds to research the L1 transition, but in the short term, #defi ecosystem has been severely weakened.
427
Starknet’s “vote to research an independent post-quantum L1” got 93.52% in favor. My first reaction after reading it was: this vote amounted to nothing—but the timing was spot on.
Let’s go over the timeline. Voting opened on October 15, the same day about 127 million STRK tokens were unlocked for investors and early team members (according to @cryptolevier on X). The vote was non-binding, with no quorum requirement. A yes vote only meant “start researching”—no migration, no timeline, no new token. The official word is that a white paper will come out in November.
And then? Someone in the replies said STRK had surged around 80% in a week, while “quantum narrative” shills were suddenly everywhere.
A Snapshot vote with no conclusions to speak of conjured up a narrative right during unlock week. Everyone knows who needs that liquidity the most.
Eli Ben-Sasson says Ethereum only becoming quantum-safe in 2029 is “too late—the deadline will slip.” He’s not wrong: STARK proofs are indeed hash-based, and accounts can switch signatures. But when the CEO of an L2 publicly talks down the timeline of its own settlement layer while promoting the possibility of going “independent,” that’s a statement from an interested party—not neutral technical commentary.
The 3,236 votes set a record for participation in Starknet’s history. Sounds exciting. Put simply, it was big stakers voting for their own story. Research is fine, but I’ve seen this combination—narrative pumps first, white paper comes later, unlock happens at the same time—far too many times.
#Starknet #STRK
Starknet’s “vote to research an independent post-quantum L1” got 93.52% in favor. My first reaction after reading it was: this vote amounted to nothing—but the timing was spot on.
Let’s go over the timeline. Voting opened on October 15, the same day about 127 million STRK tokens were unlocked for investors and early team members (according to @cryptolevier on X). The vote was non-binding, with no quorum requirement. A yes vote only meant “start researching”—no migration, no timeline, no new token. The official word is that a white paper will come out in November.
And then? Someone in the replies said STRK had surged around 80% in a week, while “quantum narrative” shills were suddenly everywhere.
A Snapshot vote with no conclusions to speak of conjured up a narrative right during unlock week. Everyone knows who needs that liquidity the most.
Eli Ben-Sasson says Ethereum only becoming quantum-safe in 2029 is “too late—the deadline will slip.” He’s not wrong: STARK proofs are indeed hash-based, and accounts can switch signatures. But when the CEO of an L2 publicly talks down the timeline of its own settlement layer while promoting the possibility of going “independent,” that’s a statement from an interested party—not neutral technical commentary.
The 3,236 votes set a record for participation in Starknet’s history. Sounds exciting. Put simply, it was big stakers voting for their own story. Research is fine, but I’ve seen this combination—narrative pumps first, white paper comes later, unlock happens at the same time—far too many times.
#Starknet #STRK
Let’s go over the timeline. Voting opened on October 15, the same day about 127 million STRK tokens were unlocked for investors and early team members (according to @cryptolevier on X). The vote was non-binding, with no quorum requirement. A yes vote only meant “start researching”—no migration, no timeline, no new token. The official word is that a white paper will come out in November.
And then? Someone in the replies said STRK had surged around 80% in a week, while “quantum narrative” shills were suddenly everywhere.
A Snapshot vote with no conclusions to speak of conjured up a narrative right during unlock week. Everyone knows who needs that liquidity the most.
Eli Ben-Sasson says Ethereum only becoming quantum-safe in 2029 is “too late—the deadline will slip.” He’s not wrong: STARK proofs are indeed hash-based, and accounts can switch signatures. But when the CEO of an L2 publicly talks down the timeline of its own settlement layer while promoting the possibility of going “independent,” that’s a statement from an interested party—not neutral technical commentary.
The 3,236 votes set a record for participation in Starknet’s history. Sounds exciting. Put simply, it was big stakers voting for their own story. Research is fine, but I’ve seen this combination—narrative pumps first, white paper comes later, unlock happens at the same time—far too many times.
#Starknet #STRK
302
·
--
Verified
【Market Flash】Starknet update: After 93% backed an independent L1, TVL fell from $158 million to $42 million on October 22, a 73% drop.
The main reason was Extended moving to the Arc chain with $120 million in TVL, while stablecoin liquidity fell from $147 million to $37 million.
STRK is down 58% from its peak. Are you bullish on Starknet becoming an independent chain?
$STRK $ETH $USDC
#Starknet #L1 #DeFi
(Source: AMBCrypto)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks; please exercise caution.
【Market Flash】Starknet update: After 93% backed an independent L1, TVL fell from $158 million to $42 million on October 22, a 73% drop.
The main reason was Extended moving to the Arc chain with $120 million in TVL, while stablecoin liquidity fell from $147 million to $37 million.
STRK is down 58% from its peak. Are you bullish on Starknet becoming an independent chain?
$STRK $ETH $USDC
#Starknet #L1 #DeFi
(Source: AMBCrypto)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks; please exercise caution.
The main reason was Extended moving to the Arc chain with $120 million in TVL, while stablecoin liquidity fell from $147 million to $37 million.
STRK is down 58% from its peak. Are you bullish on Starknet becoming an independent chain?
$STRK $ETH $USDC
#Starknet #L1 #DeFi
(Source: AMBCrypto)
⚠️Risk warning: The above is shared for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risks; please exercise caution.
1
679
·
--
Bullish
🚨 $STRK
{spot}(STRKUSDT)
TRADERS, BREAKOUT OR BULL TRAP? 👀🔥 $STRK is trading around $0.0493. Price is near a key resistance zone—confirmation matters more than hype. 📊 TRADE PLAN (conditional) Entry: Above $0.0517 after confirmation SL: $0.0445 TP1: $0.0605 TP2: $0.0668 TP3: $0.0744 ⚠️ If price fails to break resistance, don’t chase the move. 👇 What’s your view? 🟢 A. Bullish breakout 🟡 B. Wait for retest 🔴 C. More downside ⚪ D. No trade yet
#strk #Starknet #cryptotrading #BİNANCESQUARE
🚨 $STRK
TRADERS, BREAKOUT OR BULL TRAP? 👀🔥 $STRK is trading around $0.0493. Price is near a key resistance zone—confirmation matters more than hype. 📊 TRADE PLAN (conditional) Entry: Above $0.0517 after confirmation SL: $0.0445 TP1: $0.0605 TP2: $0.0668 TP3: $0.0744 ⚠️ If price fails to break resistance, don’t chase the move. 👇 What’s your view? 🟢 A. Bullish breakout 🟡 B. Wait for retest 🔴 C. More downside ⚪ D. No trade yet
#strk #Starknet #cryptotrading #BİNANCESQUARE
TRADERS, BREAKOUT OR BULL TRAP? 👀🔥 $STRK is trading around $0.0493. Price is near a key resistance zone—confirmation matters more than hype. 📊 TRADE PLAN (conditional) Entry: Above $0.0517 after confirmation SL: $0.0445 TP1: $0.0605 TP2: $0.0668 TP3: $0.0744 ⚠️ If price fails to break resistance, don’t chase the move. 👇 What’s your view? 🟢 A. Bullish breakout 🟡 B. Wait for retest 🔴 C. More downside ⚪ D. No trade yet
#strk #Starknet #cryptotrading #BİNANCESQUARE
470
·
--
🔄 Update $STRK — TP1 hit ✅
The short signal: zone $0.05161–$0.0520525, average entry $0.05183.
It activated at 14:00 and hit TP1 at $0.05110 at 15:00.
+1.41% from the average entry.
50% taken off and stop moved to break-even.
The rest is running toward TP2 at $0.04955.
📍 Current price: $0.05013
Will it keep falling to TP2, or bounce from here and stop me out?
Live price here 👇 STRK
STRK #Starknet #Layer2 #Ethereum
This is a plan, not financial advice.
🔄 Update $STRK — TP1 hit ✅
The short signal: zone $0.05161–$0.0520525, average entry $0.05183.
It activated at 14:00 and hit TP1 at $0.05110 at 15:00.
+1.41% from the average entry.
50% taken off and stop moved to break-even.
The rest is running toward TP2 at $0.04955.
📍 Current price: $0.05013
Will it keep falling to TP2, or bounce from here and stop me out?
Live price here 👇 STRK
STRK #Starknet #Layer2 #Ethereum
This is a plan, not financial advice.
The short signal: zone $0.05161–$0.0520525, average entry $0.05183.
It activated at 14:00 and hit TP1 at $0.05110 at 15:00.
+1.41% from the average entry.
50% taken off and stop moved to break-even.
The rest is running toward TP2 at $0.04955.
📍 Current price: $0.05013
Will it keep falling to TP2, or bounce from here and stop me out?
Live price here 👇 STRK
STRK #Starknet #Layer2 #Ethereum
This is a plan, not financial advice.
73
·
--
🤫 Something about $STRK , and suddenly everyone went quiet... Where did the whole crowd disappear to?
Does nobody believe in its growth and technology anymore? 🤔 While other assets are showing momentum, a real attention vacuum has formed around Starknet.
But we know crypto’s golden rule: you should buy when everyone is scared or indifferent, not when every appliance is shouting about “100x gains.” Maybe right now, amid the crowd’s complete apathy, big players are quietly building positions ahead of the L1 upgrade?
What do you think? Are there still people holding on and believing in $STRK ’s technological comeback, or is the project already “done”?
#STRK #Starknet #CryptoAnalysis #BinanceSquare #Altcoins
{spot}(STRKUSDT)
🤫 Something about $STRK , and suddenly everyone went quiet... Where did the whole crowd disappear to?
Does nobody believe in its growth and technology anymore? 🤔 While other assets are showing momentum, a real attention vacuum has formed around Starknet.
But we know crypto’s golden rule: you should buy when everyone is scared or indifferent, not when every appliance is shouting about “100x gains.” Maybe right now, amid the crowd’s complete apathy, big players are quietly building positions ahead of the L1 upgrade?
What do you think? Are there still people holding on and believing in $STRK ’s technological comeback, or is the project already “done”?
#STRK #Starknet #CryptoAnalysis #BinanceSquare #Altcoins
Does nobody believe in its growth and technology anymore? 🤔 While other assets are showing momentum, a real attention vacuum has formed around Starknet.
But we know crypto’s golden rule: you should buy when everyone is scared or indifferent, not when every appliance is shouting about “100x gains.” Maybe right now, amid the crowd’s complete apathy, big players are quietly building positions ahead of the L1 upgrade?
What do you think? Are there still people holding on and believing in $STRK ’s technological comeback, or is the project already “done”?
#STRK #Starknet #CryptoAnalysis #BinanceSquare #Altcoins
ShitcoinerMan:
this shtcoin wont going up anymore.
3
2
844
·
--
📉 $STRK loses support and the L1 debate is stirring up fear — I’m selling the fear
- The rally is over for today: STRK -7%, testing support after +24% in 30 days and +82% in 90 days
- Price is 15.9% below the 4h EMA50 ($0.0614): the broader trend is weighing on it and won’t let up
- Volume is 73.2% below yesterday’s: the drop doesn’t even have the volume to slow it down
- The order book shows $1.45M in buys versus $0.67M in sells within ±2%: there are buyers at the $0.05 support, but the price isn’t bouncing
- The debate over Starknet as an independent L1 is creating uncertainty: today’s hot narrative
- DEX volume -11.3% ($7.87B according to DefiLlama): activity is cooling along with the price
With the price 15.9% below the 4h EMA50 and volume 73% below yesterday’s, the bounce is flimsy: the area above is where you sell.
📊 STRK signal — SHORT
📍 Current price: $0.05161
🎯 Zone: $0.05161–$0.05205 (dist. 0.0%)
Enter with a limit order and scale in 50/50: half at $0.05183 and half at $0.05205.
Set the 🛑 stop loss at $0.05232 (-0.94%), confirmed BEFORE entering, with 2% of capital at risk.
✅ TP1 at $0.05110, the 24h low: take profit on 50% and leave the rest with zero risk.
🏁 TP2 at $0.04955 is the 1.414 extension of the move: the measured leg if the $0.05 support breaks.
R/R: 1:1.50 · 1:4.68.
⏳ Valid: next 8h or as long as $0.05232 holds.
Will STRK lose $0.05, or will support hold and send it back into the zone?
Check the chart and decide — live price here 👇 STRK
STRK #Starknet #Layer2 #Trading
This is a plan, not financial advice.
📉 $STRK loses support and the L1 debate is stirring up fear — I’m selling the fear
- The rally is over for today: STRK -7%, testing support after +24% in 30 days and +82% in 90 days
- Price is 15.9% below the 4h EMA50 ($0.0614): the broader trend is weighing on it and won’t let up
- Volume is 73.2% below yesterday’s: the drop doesn’t even have the volume to slow it down
- The order book shows $1.45M in buys versus $0.67M in sells within ±2%: there are buyers at the $0.05 support, but the price isn’t bouncing
- The debate over Starknet as an independent L1 is creating uncertainty: today’s hot narrative
- DEX volume -11.3% ($7.87B according to DefiLlama): activity is cooling along with the price
With the price 15.9% below the 4h EMA50 and volume 73% below yesterday’s, the bounce is flimsy: the area above is where you sell.
📊 STRK signal — SHORT
📍 Current price: $0.05161
🎯 Zone: $0.05161–$0.05205 (dist. 0.0%)
Enter with a limit order and scale in 50/50: half at $0.05183 and half at $0.05205.
Set the 🛑 stop loss at $0.05232 (-0.94%), confirmed BEFORE entering, with 2% of capital at risk.
✅ TP1 at $0.05110, the 24h low: take profit on 50% and leave the rest with zero risk.
🏁 TP2 at $0.04955 is the 1.414 extension of the move: the measured leg if the $0.05 support breaks.
R/R: 1:1.50 · 1:4.68.
⏳ Valid: next 8h or as long as $0.05232 holds.
Will STRK lose $0.05, or will support hold and send it back into the zone?
Check the chart and decide — live price here 👇 STRK
STRK #Starknet #Layer2 #Trading
This is a plan, not financial advice.
- The rally is over for today: STRK -7%, testing support after +24% in 30 days and +82% in 90 days
- Price is 15.9% below the 4h EMA50 ($0.0614): the broader trend is weighing on it and won’t let up
- Volume is 73.2% below yesterday’s: the drop doesn’t even have the volume to slow it down
- The order book shows $1.45M in buys versus $0.67M in sells within ±2%: there are buyers at the $0.05 support, but the price isn’t bouncing
- The debate over Starknet as an independent L1 is creating uncertainty: today’s hot narrative
- DEX volume -11.3% ($7.87B according to DefiLlama): activity is cooling along with the price
With the price 15.9% below the 4h EMA50 and volume 73% below yesterday’s, the bounce is flimsy: the area above is where you sell.
📊 STRK signal — SHORT
📍 Current price: $0.05161
🎯 Zone: $0.05161–$0.05205 (dist. 0.0%)
Enter with a limit order and scale in 50/50: half at $0.05183 and half at $0.05205.
Set the 🛑 stop loss at $0.05232 (-0.94%), confirmed BEFORE entering, with 2% of capital at risk.
✅ TP1 at $0.05110, the 24h low: take profit on 50% and leave the rest with zero risk.
🏁 TP2 at $0.04955 is the 1.414 extension of the move: the measured leg if the $0.05 support breaks.
R/R: 1:1.50 · 1:4.68.
⏳ Valid: next 8h or as long as $0.05232 holds.
Will STRK lose $0.05, or will support hold and send it back into the zone?
Check the chart and decide — live price here 👇 STRK
STRK #Starknet #Layer2 #Trading
This is a plan, not financial advice.
50
·
--
Starknet voters just green-lit research into a post-quantum Layer 1 — not an exit yet.
A seven-day Snapshot poll for STRK stakers and delegators closed on October 22, 2026 with about 93.52% of voting power in favor and roughly 3,200 votes cast — StarkWare’s highest governance turnout yet. The company abstained so the community could decide. The yes only authorizes research into an independent, post-quantum L1; Starknet stays an Ethereum Layer 2 for now, and any real transition needs a separate binding vote.
StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation have started a working group, with CEO Eli Ben-Sasson targeting a draft whitepaper for public review in November. $STRK remains the only token, no new coin is planned, and Ethereum bridges stay open while the quantum-security roadmap is studied. Watch November’s paper, not headlines claiming an instant L1 flip.
#STRK #Starknet #Ethereum #Crypto
DYOR. Not financial advice.
{spot}(STRKUSDT)
Starknet voters just green-lit research into a post-quantum Layer 1 — not an exit yet.
A seven-day Snapshot poll for STRK stakers and delegators closed on October 22, 2026 with about 93.52% of voting power in favor and roughly 3,200 votes cast — StarkWare’s highest governance turnout yet. The company abstained so the community could decide. The yes only authorizes research into an independent, post-quantum L1; Starknet stays an Ethereum Layer 2 for now, and any real transition needs a separate binding vote.
StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation have started a working group, with CEO Eli Ben-Sasson targeting a draft whitepaper for public review in November. $STRK remains the only token, no new coin is planned, and Ethereum bridges stay open while the quantum-security roadmap is studied. Watch November’s paper, not headlines claiming an instant L1 flip.
#STRK #Starknet #Ethereum #Crypto
DYOR. Not financial advice.
A seven-day Snapshot poll for STRK stakers and delegators closed on October 22, 2026 with about 93.52% of voting power in favor and roughly 3,200 votes cast — StarkWare’s highest governance turnout yet. The company abstained so the community could decide. The yes only authorizes research into an independent, post-quantum L1; Starknet stays an Ethereum Layer 2 for now, and any real transition needs a separate binding vote.
StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation have started a working group, with CEO Eli Ben-Sasson targeting a draft whitepaper for public review in November. $STRK remains the only token, no new coin is planned, and Ethereum bridges stay open while the quantum-security roadmap is studied. Watch November’s paper, not headlines claiming an instant L1 flip.
#STRK #Starknet #Ethereum #Crypto
DYOR. Not financial advice.
2
444
·
--
Starknet Community Vote Passes: Launch Research into an “Independent Post-Quantum L1”
The non-binding Snapshot vote (10/15–10/22) passed with approximately 93.52% of voting power in favor, representing about 3,236 votes; StarkWare abstained. This does not mean a move to L1 has been approved. A formal migration would still require a subsequent binding governance vote.
Key points:
1. Goal: Research becoming an independent, quantum-resistant Layer 1; Starknet currently continues to operate as an Ethereum L2.
2. StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation have established a joint working group; a draft white paper is planned for public release in November.
3. Official position: $STRK remains the native token, with no new token to be issued; the bridge to $ETH can remain open.
4. Background: The team says it hopes to advance post-quantum capabilities ahead of Ethereum’s quantum-safety timeline (with a publicly stated target of around 2027).
Sources: Official StarkWare blog, Starknet governance forum, Cointelegraph.
For informational purposes only; not investment advice. DYOR. Use official channels only, and don’t click unfamiliar claim links.
#Starknet #STRK #Ethereum #L2 #Web3
Starknet Community Vote Passes: Launch Research into an “Independent Post-Quantum L1”
The non-binding Snapshot vote (10/15–10/22) passed with approximately 93.52% of voting power in favor, representing about 3,236 votes; StarkWare abstained. This does not mean a move to L1 has been approved. A formal migration would still require a subsequent binding governance vote.
Key points:
1. Goal: Research becoming an independent, quantum-resistant Layer 1; Starknet currently continues to operate as an Ethereum L2.
2. StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation have established a joint working group; a draft white paper is planned for public release in November.
3. Official position: $STRK remains the native token, with no new token to be issued; the bridge to $ETH can remain open.
4. Background: The team says it hopes to advance post-quantum capabilities ahead of Ethereum’s quantum-safety timeline (with a publicly stated target of around 2027).
Sources: Official StarkWare blog, Starknet governance forum, Cointelegraph.
For informational purposes only; not investment advice. DYOR. Use official channels only, and don’t click unfamiliar claim links.
#Starknet #STRK #Ethereum #L2 #Web3
The non-binding Snapshot vote (10/15–10/22) passed with approximately 93.52% of voting power in favor, representing about 3,236 votes; StarkWare abstained. This does not mean a move to L1 has been approved. A formal migration would still require a subsequent binding governance vote.
Key points:
1. Goal: Research becoming an independent, quantum-resistant Layer 1; Starknet currently continues to operate as an Ethereum L2.
2. StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation have established a joint working group; a draft white paper is planned for public release in November.
3. Official position: $STRK remains the native token, with no new token to be issued; the bridge to $ETH can remain open.
4. Background: The team says it hopes to advance post-quantum capabilities ahead of Ethereum’s quantum-safety timeline (with a publicly stated target of around 2027).
Sources: Official StarkWare blog, Starknet governance forum, Cointelegraph.
For informational purposes only; not investment advice. DYOR. Use official channels only, and don’t click unfamiliar claim links.
#Starknet #STRK #Ethereum #L2 #Web3
33
Verified
Starknet's L1 research poll passed with 93.52%. 3,236 wallets voted, but 50 of them cast 89% of the voting power.
The Snapshot poll closed on Oct 22. It asked whether StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation should research turning Starknet into an independent post-quantum L1. Yes took 457.6M STRK of voting power, No took 22.4M and Neutral 9.3M.
We pulled the votes from Snapshot and ranked them. The top 20 wallets carried 47% of the weight on their own. The other 3,186 wallets added up to about 11%.
Total weight was 489M STRK, about 6.4% of the 7.59B STRK in circulation. A staking poll on the same Snapshot space in March drew 350 votes and 492M STRK. Nine times more voters this time, and almost the same weight.
The poll is non-binding and StarkWare abstained. Starknet stays an Ethereum L2 for now, STRK stays the token and the bridges to Ethereum stay open. Any real move needs a separate binding vote once the research is done.
On these numbers, that binding vote will be settled by a few dozen wallets.
$STRK
#Starknet #Ethereum
NFA. DYOR.
Starknet's L1 research poll passed with 93.52%. 3,236 wallets voted, but 50 of them cast 89% of the voting power.
The Snapshot poll closed on Oct 22. It asked whether StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation should research turning Starknet into an independent post-quantum L1. Yes took 457.6M STRK of voting power, No took 22.4M and Neutral 9.3M.
We pulled the votes from Snapshot and ranked them. The top 20 wallets carried 47% of the weight on their own. The other 3,186 wallets added up to about 11%.
Total weight was 489M STRK, about 6.4% of the 7.59B STRK in circulation. A staking poll on the same Snapshot space in March drew 350 votes and 492M STRK. Nine times more voters this time, and almost the same weight.
The poll is non-binding and StarkWare abstained. Starknet stays an Ethereum L2 for now, STRK stays the token and the bridges to Ethereum stay open. Any real move needs a separate binding vote once the research is done.
On these numbers, that binding vote will be settled by a few dozen wallets.
$STRK
#Starknet #Ethereum
NFA. DYOR.
The Snapshot poll closed on Oct 22. It asked whether StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation should research turning Starknet into an independent post-quantum L1. Yes took 457.6M STRK of voting power, No took 22.4M and Neutral 9.3M.
We pulled the votes from Snapshot and ranked them. The top 20 wallets carried 47% of the weight on their own. The other 3,186 wallets added up to about 11%.
Total weight was 489M STRK, about 6.4% of the 7.59B STRK in circulation. A staking poll on the same Snapshot space in March drew 350 votes and 492M STRK. Nine times more voters this time, and almost the same weight.
The poll is non-binding and StarkWare abstained. Starknet stays an Ethereum L2 for now, STRK stays the token and the bridges to Ethereum stay open. Any real move needs a separate binding vote once the research is done.
On these numbers, that binding vote will be settled by a few dozen wallets.
$STRK
#Starknet #Ethereum
NFA. DYOR.
1
720
·
--
A very “future-facing” vote has appeared in L2 circles.
About 93.5% of votes in Starknet’s community governance poll supported “researching” the possibility of becoming an independent post-quantum L1. The official team stressed that this is not a binding decision; Starknet remains an Ethereum L2 for now. Any actual migration would require another binding vote. StarkWare says it will draft a white paper.
Research ≠ decoupling. But the community’s willingness to put an “independent post-quantum chain” on the agenda shows that the narrative has already moved beyond scaling to long-term security architecture.
#Starknet #以太坊 #L2 #PostQuantum
A very “future-facing” vote has appeared in L2 circles.
About 93.5% of votes in Starknet’s community governance poll supported “researching” the possibility of becoming an independent post-quantum L1. The official team stressed that this is not a binding decision; Starknet remains an Ethereum L2 for now. Any actual migration would require another binding vote. StarkWare says it will draft a white paper.
Research ≠ decoupling. But the community’s willingness to put an “independent post-quantum chain” on the agenda shows that the narrative has already moved beyond scaling to long-term security architecture.
#Starknet #以太坊 #L2 #PostQuantum
About 93.5% of votes in Starknet’s community governance poll supported “researching” the possibility of becoming an independent post-quantum L1. The official team stressed that this is not a binding decision; Starknet remains an Ethereum L2 for now. Any actual migration would require another binding vote. StarkWare says it will draft a white paper.
Research ≠ decoupling. But the community’s willingness to put an “independent post-quantum chain” on the agenda shows that the narrative has already moved beyond scaling to long-term security architecture.
#Starknet #以太坊 #L2 #PostQuantum
7
·
--
⚛️ Does Starknet want to leave Ethereum? 93.52% of votes say: “Let’s study it.” And the reason is quantum computers.
📌 The facts (Starknet forum, Cointelegraph, Unchained)
• 7-day Snapshot poll, closed Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026
• 93.52% of voting power for “Yes, it should be studied” (~4.6% no, ~1.9% neutral)
• ~3,200 votes, ~489 million $STRK committed, record turnout
• StarkWare abstained to let the community decide
• Draft white paper expected in November
🧠 Why this matters
Starknet is an “L2”: a layer that relies on $ETH for its security (bridging + data storage). Its STARK proofs are already resistant to future quantum computers, but Ethereum is aiming to be protected by 2029. Starknet wants to get there by 2027… and to do that, it’s considering becoming its own blockchain (“L1”).
👤 Imagine Fanta (a fictional character), a developer in Abidjan building a payment app on Starknet. If the network changes its foundations, she’ll need to know: will my contracts remain compatible? Will bridges to Ethereum stay open?
⚖️ The nuance
• The vote does NOT approve leaving: it only opens the door to research
• A separate binding vote will be needed
• No new token: STRK remains the network’s token, and bridges stay open
• Leaving Ethereum means gaining independence… but losing shared security
✅ What do you think? Starknet should become an L1 🟢 / Stay on Ethereum 🔵 / Too early to say 🟡 👇
Not financial advice. DYOR.
Sources: Starknet Foundation, Cointelegraph, Unchained (Oct. 22–23, 2026).
#Starknet #Ethereum #CryptoNews
⚛️ Does Starknet want to leave Ethereum? 93.52% of votes say: “Let’s study it.” And the reason is quantum computers.
📌 The facts (Starknet forum, Cointelegraph, Unchained)
• 7-day Snapshot poll, closed Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026
• 93.52% of voting power for “Yes, it should be studied” (~4.6% no, ~1.9% neutral)
• ~3,200 votes, ~489 million $STRK committed, record turnout
• StarkWare abstained to let the community decide
• Draft white paper expected in November
🧠 Why this matters
Starknet is an “L2”: a layer that relies on $ETH for its security (bridging + data storage). Its STARK proofs are already resistant to future quantum computers, but Ethereum is aiming to be protected by 2029. Starknet wants to get there by 2027… and to do that, it’s considering becoming its own blockchain (“L1”).
👤 Imagine Fanta (a fictional character), a developer in Abidjan building a payment app on Starknet. If the network changes its foundations, she’ll need to know: will my contracts remain compatible? Will bridges to Ethereum stay open?
⚖️ The nuance
• The vote does NOT approve leaving: it only opens the door to research
• A separate binding vote will be needed
• No new token: STRK remains the network’s token, and bridges stay open
• Leaving Ethereum means gaining independence… but losing shared security
✅ What do you think? Starknet should become an L1 🟢 / Stay on Ethereum 🔵 / Too early to say 🟡 👇
Not financial advice. DYOR.
Sources: Starknet Foundation, Cointelegraph, Unchained (Oct. 22–23, 2026).
#Starknet #Ethereum #CryptoNews
📌 The facts (Starknet forum, Cointelegraph, Unchained)
• 7-day Snapshot poll, closed Thursday, Oct. 22, 2026
• 93.52% of voting power for “Yes, it should be studied” (~4.6% no, ~1.9% neutral)
• ~3,200 votes, ~489 million $STRK committed, record turnout
• StarkWare abstained to let the community decide
• Draft white paper expected in November
🧠 Why this matters
Starknet is an “L2”: a layer that relies on $ETH for its security (bridging + data storage). Its STARK proofs are already resistant to future quantum computers, but Ethereum is aiming to be protected by 2029. Starknet wants to get there by 2027… and to do that, it’s considering becoming its own blockchain (“L1”).
👤 Imagine Fanta (a fictional character), a developer in Abidjan building a payment app on Starknet. If the network changes its foundations, she’ll need to know: will my contracts remain compatible? Will bridges to Ethereum stay open?
⚖️ The nuance
• The vote does NOT approve leaving: it only opens the door to research
• A separate binding vote will be needed
• No new token: STRK remains the network’s token, and bridges stay open
• Leaving Ethereum means gaining independence… but losing shared security
✅ What do you think? Starknet should become an L1 🟢 / Stay on Ethereum 🔵 / Too early to say 🟡 👇
Not financial advice. DYOR.
Sources: Starknet Foundation, Cointelegraph, Unchained (Oct. 22–23, 2026).
#Starknet #Ethereum #CryptoNews
149
·
--
These Starknet folks really seem ready to go solo
Just in: The Starknet community has voted in favor of starting research into “leaving Ethereum and becoming an independent, post-quantum L1.”
93.52% of the voting power was in favor, with more than 3,200 votes cast.
This was the highest-participation vote in Starknet governance history.
StarkWare abstained, leaving the decision to the community.
First, an important distinction: They didn’t vote to “break up now.”
They voted to “study whether they should break up.”
If they do decide to leave, there’ll have to be another binding vote later.
Starknet is still an L2 on Ethereum and continues to operate as usual.
The team says a white paper draft will be published in November for public review.
So why consider leaving all of a sudden? The reason is pretty hardcore: post-quantum security.
Once quantum computers mature, elliptic-curve signatures could be as flimsy as paper.
On-chain assets would be completely exposed.
Starknet’s ZK architecture has a natural advantage when it comes to quantum resistance.
Leaving Ethereum could give them more freedom to move at their own pace.
The most surreal thing to me is the reversal in logic.
Isn’t the “Ethereum ecosystem” what gives L2s their prestige?
Arbitrum and Optimism rely on it to attract users.
But Starknet is doing the opposite: no more riding Ethereum’s coattails—they’re going solo.
They’re betting that the “quantum-resistant” narrative can support an independent valuation.
But the numbers tell it like it is.
More than 3,200 votes, with 93.5% in favor—the community really does want independence.
But let’s not forget that most of Starknet’s TVL and active users
still come from the Ethereum ecosystem.
Decoupling is easy; standing alone is hard.
Here’s another uncomfortable point: this vote isn’t binding.
The white paper draft won’t be out until November.
In other words, the community has spoken first, and the team will take its time researching afterward.
Is this a real blueprint, or just a new story to tell $STRK ?
Let’s wait and see.
Do you think L2s going solo is a way forward, or will they fade without Ethereum?
Let’s talk in the comments 👇
$STRK $ETH #Starknet #Ethereum
Not investment advice. DYOR. Trading involves risk.
These Starknet folks really seem ready to go solo
Just in: The Starknet community has voted in favor of starting research into “leaving Ethereum and becoming an independent, post-quantum L1.”
93.52% of the voting power was in favor, with more than 3,200 votes cast.
This was the highest-participation vote in Starknet governance history.
StarkWare abstained, leaving the decision to the community.
First, an important distinction: They didn’t vote to “break up now.”
They voted to “study whether they should break up.”
If they do decide to leave, there’ll have to be another binding vote later.
Starknet is still an L2 on Ethereum and continues to operate as usual.
The team says a white paper draft will be published in November for public review.
So why consider leaving all of a sudden? The reason is pretty hardcore: post-quantum security.
Once quantum computers mature, elliptic-curve signatures could be as flimsy as paper.
On-chain assets would be completely exposed.
Starknet’s ZK architecture has a natural advantage when it comes to quantum resistance.
Leaving Ethereum could give them more freedom to move at their own pace.
The most surreal thing to me is the reversal in logic.
Isn’t the “Ethereum ecosystem” what gives L2s their prestige?
Arbitrum and Optimism rely on it to attract users.
But Starknet is doing the opposite: no more riding Ethereum’s coattails—they’re going solo.
They’re betting that the “quantum-resistant” narrative can support an independent valuation.
But the numbers tell it like it is.
More than 3,200 votes, with 93.5% in favor—the community really does want independence.
But let’s not forget that most of Starknet’s TVL and active users
still come from the Ethereum ecosystem.
Decoupling is easy; standing alone is hard.
Here’s another uncomfortable point: this vote isn’t binding.
The white paper draft won’t be out until November.
In other words, the community has spoken first, and the team will take its time researching afterward.
Is this a real blueprint, or just a new story to tell $STRK ?
Let’s wait and see.
Do you think L2s going solo is a way forward, or will they fade without Ethereum?
Let’s talk in the comments 👇
$STRK $ETH #Starknet #Ethereum
Not investment advice. DYOR. Trading involves risk.
Just in: The Starknet community has voted in favor of starting research into “leaving Ethereum and becoming an independent, post-quantum L1.”
93.52% of the voting power was in favor, with more than 3,200 votes cast.
This was the highest-participation vote in Starknet governance history.
StarkWare abstained, leaving the decision to the community.
First, an important distinction: They didn’t vote to “break up now.”
They voted to “study whether they should break up.”
If they do decide to leave, there’ll have to be another binding vote later.
Starknet is still an L2 on Ethereum and continues to operate as usual.
The team says a white paper draft will be published in November for public review.
So why consider leaving all of a sudden? The reason is pretty hardcore: post-quantum security.
Once quantum computers mature, elliptic-curve signatures could be as flimsy as paper.
On-chain assets would be completely exposed.
Starknet’s ZK architecture has a natural advantage when it comes to quantum resistance.
Leaving Ethereum could give them more freedom to move at their own pace.
The most surreal thing to me is the reversal in logic.
Isn’t the “Ethereum ecosystem” what gives L2s their prestige?
Arbitrum and Optimism rely on it to attract users.
But Starknet is doing the opposite: no more riding Ethereum’s coattails—they’re going solo.
They’re betting that the “quantum-resistant” narrative can support an independent valuation.
But the numbers tell it like it is.
More than 3,200 votes, with 93.5% in favor—the community really does want independence.
But let’s not forget that most of Starknet’s TVL and active users
still come from the Ethereum ecosystem.
Decoupling is easy; standing alone is hard.
Here’s another uncomfortable point: this vote isn’t binding.
The white paper draft won’t be out until November.
In other words, the community has spoken first, and the team will take its time researching afterward.
Is this a real blueprint, or just a new story to tell $STRK ?
Let’s wait and see.
Do you think L2s going solo is a way forward, or will they fade without Ethereum?
Let’s talk in the comments 👇
$STRK $ETH #Starknet #Ethereum
Not investment advice. DYOR. Trading involves risk.
5
·
--
【Market Flash】A whopping 93.5% vote in favor! Starknet vote: Explore transitioning to an independent quantum-resistant L1 (first revealed by Eli).
Quantum computers are nowhere in sight, but some are already putting on armor. Once quantum computing becomes practical, existing cryptography will have to be rewritten.
After years of the L2 narrative, a leading project wants to go “independent.” How much longer can Ethereum L2s keep playing this card? While altcoins struggle through the ups and downs, they’re positioning for the future.
Is going solo foresight or just hype? Comment 1 if you’re bullish, 2 if you’re not.
$STRK $ETH $BTC
#Starknet #抗量子 #Layer2
(Source: Coinfomania)
⚠️Risk Disclaimer: The above is shared for market information only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; please exercise caution.
【Market Flash】A whopping 93.5% vote in favor! Starknet vote: Explore transitioning to an independent quantum-resistant L1 (first revealed by Eli).
Quantum computers are nowhere in sight, but some are already putting on armor. Once quantum computing becomes practical, existing cryptography will have to be rewritten.
After years of the L2 narrative, a leading project wants to go “independent.” How much longer can Ethereum L2s keep playing this card? While altcoins struggle through the ups and downs, they’re positioning for the future.
Is going solo foresight or just hype? Comment 1 if you’re bullish, 2 if you’re not.
$STRK $ETH $BTC
#Starknet #抗量子 #Layer2
(Source: Coinfomania)
⚠️Risk Disclaimer: The above is shared for market information only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; please exercise caution.
Quantum computers are nowhere in sight, but some are already putting on armor. Once quantum computing becomes practical, existing cryptography will have to be rewritten.
After years of the L2 narrative, a leading project wants to go “independent.” How much longer can Ethereum L2s keep playing this card? While altcoins struggle through the ups and downs, they’re positioning for the future.
Is going solo foresight or just hype? Comment 1 if you’re bullish, 2 if you’re not.
$STRK $ETH $BTC
#Starknet #抗量子 #Layer2
(Source: Coinfomania)
⚠️Risk Disclaimer: The above is shared for market information only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; please exercise caution.
402
Article
Starknet Votes 93.52% to Explore Leaving Ethereum: What It Really Means for $STRKThe poll is non-binding and only approves research into a quantum-resistant layer-1. Here's what changed, what didn't, and why $STRK holders should read the fine print.
🗳️ Starknet's community just voted 93.52% in favor, and the headlines are shouting "Ethereum exit." The vote itself says something much smaller.
The seven-day governance poll closed on October 22. About 3,200 votes were cast, a record for Starknet governance, and 93.52% of voting power backed researching whether Starknet should become an independent, quantum-resistant layer-1 instead of staying an Ethereum layer-2.
🏷️ Here's the fine print most headlines skip.
The poll is non-binding. It authorizes study, not departure. Starknet keeps running as an Ethereum L2, $STRK stays its native token with non-new token planned, and the bridges to Ethereum stay open. A draft whitepaper is planned for November, and any real move would need a separate governance vote.
🧠 Why is this even on the table?
The reason is quantum computing. Starknet's STARK proofs are hash-based, and its accounts can adopt post-quantum signatures, but its bridge and data availability still depend on Ethereum's upgrade timeline. StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson wants Starknet quantum-resistant by 2027, and he argues that Ethereum's projected timeline of 2029 is too late. StarkWare's Quantum Hub says it has tested a quantum-resistant transaction on Starknet, though independent auditors haven't reviewed the method.
⚠️ Read the 93.52% carefully.
That number measures voting power, not the share of holders who agreed. Most of the voting power came from tokens delegated by the Foundation, and StarkWare itself abstained. Early tallies above 99.9% were circulating before the final count landed. It's also worth noting that $STRK has given back most of its October rally, so the market isn't treating this as a bullish catalyst yet.
✅ What this means for you
If you trade $STRK, nothing has been decided, so don't price in an exit that hasn't been approved. The next real catalyst is the November whitepaper, and headline-driven swings are likely until then.
If you're on the sidelines, this is a story to understand, not to chase. The difference between an L2 and an L1 matters here, because leaving Ethereum would change what secures the network.
If you hold $STRK, there's nothing to move or migrate. The token stays, the bridges stay open, and the thing to watch is the governance forum where the next proposals will appear.
🟢 Bullish scenario
The whitepaper lays out a credible plan, the quantum-security angle draws fresh attention to Starknet, and $STRK holders keep their token while the network gains a differentiated story.
🔴 Risk scenario
The research drags on, voting power concentration fuels doubts about how representative the result was, and Starknet loses the "secured by Ethereum" pitch without a clear replacement.
👀 Three things to watch
1️⃣ The November whitepaper
Does it describe a concrete architecture and security model, or stay high level?
2️⃣ The next binding vote
Who votes this time, and does participation reach beyond the Foundation's delegated tokens?
3️⃣ Ethereum's response
Does Ethereum bring its own quantum plans forward from the 2029 estimate?
💡 The key takeaway
The vote opened a research door, not an exit door. Starknet is still an Ethereum L2, and any real departure needs another vote and a lot more detail.
The real question isn't whether 93.52% sounds decisive. It's whether the people who actually hold $STRK will back the plan once there's something concrete to vote on.
That is the part worth watching.
This post is for informational and educational purposes only and is not financial advice. Crypto markets are volatile. Always conduct your own research before making financial decisions.
#BinanceSquare #Starknet #STRK #Ethereum #QuantumResistance
{spot}(ETHUSDT)
{spot}(STRKUSDT)
Starknet Votes 93.52% to Explore Leaving Ethereum: What It Really Means for $STRK
The poll is non-binding and only approves research into a quantum-resistant layer-1. Here's what changed, what didn't, and why $STRK holders should read the fine print.
🗳️ Starknet's community just voted 93.52% in favor, and the headlines are shouting "Ethereum exit." The vote itself says something much smaller.
The seven-day governance poll closed on October 22. About 3,200 votes were cast, a record for Starknet governance, and 93.52% of voting power backed researching whether Starknet should become an independent, quantum-resistant layer-1 instead of staying an Ethereum layer-2.
🏷️ Here's the fine print most headlines skip.
The poll is non-binding. It authorizes study, not departure. Starknet keeps running as an Ethereum L2, $STRK stays its native token with non-new token planned, and the bridges to Ethereum stay open. A draft whitepaper is planned for November, and any real move would need a separate governance vote.
🧠 Why is this even on the table?
The reason is quantum computing. Starknet's STARK proofs are hash-based, and its accounts can adopt post-quantum signatures, but its bridge and data availability still depend on Ethereum's upgrade timeline. StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson wants Starknet quantum-resistant by 2027, and he argues that Ethereum's projected timeline of 2029 is too late. StarkWare's Quantum Hub says it has tested a quantum-resistant transaction on Starknet, though independent auditors haven't reviewed the method.
⚠️ Read the 93.52% carefully.
That number measures voting power, not the share of holders who agreed. Most of the voting power came from tokens delegated by the Foundation, and StarkWare itself abstained. Early tallies above 99.9% were circulating before the final count landed. It's also worth noting that $STRK has given back most of its October rally, so the market isn't treating this as a bullish catalyst yet.
✅ What this means for you
If you trade $STRK, nothing has been decided, so don't price in an exit that hasn't been approved. The next real catalyst is the November whitepaper, and headline-driven swings are likely until then.
If you're on the sidelines, this is a story to understand, not to chase. The difference between an L2 and an L1 matters here, because leaving Ethereum would change what secures the network.
If you hold $STRK, there's nothing to move or migrate. The token stays, the bridges stay open, and the thing to watch is the governance forum where the next proposals will appear.
🟢 Bullish scenario
The whitepaper lays out a credible plan, the quantum-security angle draws fresh attention to Starknet, and $STRK holders keep their token while the network gains a differentiated story.
🔴 Risk scenario
The research drags on, voting power concentration fuels doubts about how representative the result was, and Starknet loses the "secured by Ethereum" pitch without a clear replacement.
👀 Three things to watch
1️⃣ The November whitepaper
Does it describe a concrete architecture and security model, or stay high level?
2️⃣ The next binding vote
Who votes this time, and does participation reach beyond the Foundation's delegated tokens?
3️⃣ Ethereum's response
Does Ethereum bring its own quantum plans forward from the 2029 estimate?
💡 The key takeaway
The vote opened a research door, not an exit door. Starknet is still an Ethereum L2, and any real departure needs another vote and a lot more detail.
The real question isn't whether 93.52% sounds decisive. It's whether the people who actually hold $STRK will back the plan once there's something concrete to vote on.
That is the part worth watching.
This post is for informational and educational purposes only and is not financial advice. Crypto markets are volatile. Always conduct your own research before making financial decisions.
#BinanceSquare #Starknet #STRK #Ethereum #QuantumResistance
🗳️ Starknet's community just voted 93.52% in favor, and the headlines are shouting "Ethereum exit." The vote itself says something much smaller.
The seven-day governance poll closed on October 22. About 3,200 votes were cast, a record for Starknet governance, and 93.52% of voting power backed researching whether Starknet should become an independent, quantum-resistant layer-1 instead of staying an Ethereum layer-2.
🏷️ Here's the fine print most headlines skip.
The poll is non-binding. It authorizes study, not departure. Starknet keeps running as an Ethereum L2, $STRK stays its native token with non-new token planned, and the bridges to Ethereum stay open. A draft whitepaper is planned for November, and any real move would need a separate governance vote.
🧠 Why is this even on the table?
The reason is quantum computing. Starknet's STARK proofs are hash-based, and its accounts can adopt post-quantum signatures, but its bridge and data availability still depend on Ethereum's upgrade timeline. StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson wants Starknet quantum-resistant by 2027, and he argues that Ethereum's projected timeline of 2029 is too late. StarkWare's Quantum Hub says it has tested a quantum-resistant transaction on Starknet, though independent auditors haven't reviewed the method.
⚠️ Read the 93.52% carefully.
That number measures voting power, not the share of holders who agreed. Most of the voting power came from tokens delegated by the Foundation, and StarkWare itself abstained. Early tallies above 99.9% were circulating before the final count landed. It's also worth noting that $STRK has given back most of its October rally, so the market isn't treating this as a bullish catalyst yet.
✅ What this means for you
If you trade $STRK, nothing has been decided, so don't price in an exit that hasn't been approved. The next real catalyst is the November whitepaper, and headline-driven swings are likely until then.
If you're on the sidelines, this is a story to understand, not to chase. The difference between an L2 and an L1 matters here, because leaving Ethereum would change what secures the network.
If you hold $STRK, there's nothing to move or migrate. The token stays, the bridges stay open, and the thing to watch is the governance forum where the next proposals will appear.
🟢 Bullish scenario
The whitepaper lays out a credible plan, the quantum-security angle draws fresh attention to Starknet, and $STRK holders keep their token while the network gains a differentiated story.
🔴 Risk scenario
The research drags on, voting power concentration fuels doubts about how representative the result was, and Starknet loses the "secured by Ethereum" pitch without a clear replacement.
👀 Three things to watch
1️⃣ The November whitepaper
Does it describe a concrete architecture and security model, or stay high level?
2️⃣ The next binding vote
Who votes this time, and does participation reach beyond the Foundation's delegated tokens?
3️⃣ Ethereum's response
Does Ethereum bring its own quantum plans forward from the 2029 estimate?
💡 The key takeaway
The vote opened a research door, not an exit door. Starknet is still an Ethereum L2, and any real departure needs another vote and a lot more detail.
The real question isn't whether 93.52% sounds decisive. It's whether the people who actually hold $STRK will back the plan once there's something concrete to vote on.
That is the part worth watching.
This post is for informational and educational purposes only and is not financial advice. Crypto markets are volatile. Always conduct your own research before making financial decisions.
#BinanceSquare #Starknet #STRK #Ethereum #QuantumResistance
2
2
461
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
1
#BinancePick
2.2M views
123,688 Discussing
2
#EarningsSeason
4.8M views
22,757 Discussing
3
#USQ3GDPAndSeptemberPCEDueNextWeek
43,355 views
696 Discussing
4
#SouthKoreaDelaysCryptoIncomeTax
92,180 views
765 Discussing
5
#ElectrumFixesHighRiskExploitInVersionsBefore4.8.3
41,815 views
577 Discussing
6
#SouthKoreaPlansToRegulateStablecoinsUnderFXLaw
40,615 views
566 Discussing
7
#UKAlgorithmicCryptoTradingAppsMayNeedFCAAuthorization
7,889 views
163 Discussing
8
#DowDrops653Points
168,179 views
1,387 Discussing
9
#MarketsPriceJust10%ChanceOfFedHikeNextWeek
104,637 views
955 Discussing
10
#OCCRemovesStablecoinSevenDayRedemptionExtension
49,498 views
652 Discussing