etf

Thailand’s spot crypto ETFs: The road is ready, but the cars haven’t arrived. Thailand’s SEC confirmed that several asset managers have already made inquiries about local spot BTC and ETH ETFs, but it has yet to receive a single formal application. Even the regulator won’t guarantee they’ll launch in 2026. The rules took effect on October 16: 11 notifications, single-asset passive funds, average annual net exposure of at least 80%, listings only on the Stock Exchange of Thailand, custody by an SEC-approved custodian, and no leverage offered by brokers. Retail investors must complete risk education before they can buy. Until now, Thais could only get BTC exposure through overseas-linked funds. Now there’s a local route, but no one has been first to file—the regulator has opened the door, while the market is still watching from the sidelines. That’s the clearest signal of all. $BTC $ETH #ETF #Thailand

🚨 $DOGE STAGGERING AS ETF WAVES CRASH THE MEME BEAST 🐻

📊 The broad market shake‑up has seeped into Dogecoin’s ETF corridor, throttling its usual bounce. Momentum stalls, and volume on the 4H chart is whisper‑thin, a clear sign the crowd is stepping back. 🦈 Smart‑money eyes are likely skimming the order book, hunting the next liquidity dip before any revival.

⚡ With the ETF inflow pipeline drying, sellers dominate the last few candles, pushing the price toward the next support zone. 📉 How are you positioning as the meme king faces a bearish tide? 💬

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #DOGE #Bearish #ETF #Crypto

🔥 🦈

🚨 SOL DIPPED UNDER $100, THEN TOOK IT BACK

$SOL fell under $100 on Saturday while $BTC slid under $80,000 and $ETH under $2,350. Over $200M in leveraged longs got liquidated in 60 minutes (WatcherGuru).

SOL now trades at $102.34, flat over 24h on $174M Binance spot volume. BTC sits at $80,807, ETH at $2,356.

📊 WHY THIS DIP LOOKS DIFFERENT

ETF flows tell the rotation story. BTC spot ETFs lost $635.6M on Thursday and another $137.9M on Friday (Farside). ETH funds bled $220.66M for the week (CoinEdition). SOL ETFs took in $30.09M, the only major asset with fresh money, helped by new Fidelity and Canary launches.

My take: this is not SOL strength in isolation, it is money rotating while the two big funds bleed. Solana also shipped its Alpenglow upgrade this week, so the chain has a real catalyst behind the flow, not just a headline.

⚠️ BUT ONE WEEK DOES NOT MAKE A TREND

SOL ETF inflows partly reflect new launches, not steady demand yet, and BTC ETF flows have flipped sign within days before. If the $100 level fails again, the reclaim story dies fast.

🟢 Hold $100: dip buyers stay in control, next test is holding above $102
🔴 Lose $100: the bounce was a dead cat, not a rotation

Is SOL the rotation trade of this selloff, or just the last one standing before it follows BTC down? 👇

Not financial advice. DYOR.
#crypto #Solana #ETF

【Market Update】Just 30 days after launch, Grayscale’s Zcash ETF has surpassed $1 billion in assets under management, making it one of this year’s fastest-growing single-asset crypto funds!
The product, ticker ZCSH, wraps the privacy coin ZEC in an ETF. Breaking $1 billion in 30 days shows that the privacy narrative is no longer just crypto insiders talking among themselves—investors are voting with real money.
Do you think this surge in privacy coins reflects genuine demand, or is it just a short-lived ETF-fueled hype cycle?
$ZEC $BTC $ETH
#Zcash #隐私币 #ETF
(Source: Coinotag)
⚠️Risk Warning: The information above is for market discussion only and does not constitute investment advice. Investing involves risk; please exercise caution.

169,000 ETH left exchanges in one day—the biggest outflow in four months
Santiment: On October 23, net withdrawals totaled 169,000 ETH, worth about $407 million
The last time outflows were this large was June 5, when 224,000 ETH left exchanges—right at a local low

Meanwhile, ETFs are still bleeding
From October 1 to 22, U.S. spot ETH ETFs saw over $1 billion in net outflows
There were net outflows on 14 of 16 trading days
On October 23, just $4.4 million flowed back in—a drop in the bucket

ETH is down 12% in October, currently around $2,380
On-chain holders are accumulating while ETFs are selling—the same money, two different stories

I think whether this wave of withdrawals signals dip-buying or simply risk aversion depends on whether ETFs see consecutive inflows next week. Watch, don’t chase.
Invalidation: ETH closes below $2,330 on the daily chart, or ETFs see another $200 million in outflows before the end of October

Do you think this is a bottom signal, or are institutions not done selling yet?
$ETH $BTC
#以太坊 #ETF
This is not investment advice. DYOR. Trading involves risk.

📢 BLACKROCK MAKES ANOTHER MOVE IN BITCOIN

BlackRock has filed for a proposed Bitcoin ETF that would use options to limit some downside risk.

The strategy could appeal to investors seeking regulated BTC exposure with a degree of protection but gains would also be capped, and losses aren't eliminated.
$BTC
#blackRock #bitcoin #etf

$BTC
🚨 Bitcoin under pressure… and institutions are pulling out millions!

📉 U.S. Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows of $137.9 million during the October 23, 2026 session.

⚠️ The figures are preliminary and subject to change, and do not necessarily mean the decline will continue.

🔥 Are institutions taking advantage of the dip to reposition, or are we facing a new wave of pressure on BTC?

#Bitcoin #BTC #ETF

💸 $ETFT.ETF OUTFLOWS KILLING BTC

Oct 22: -$635M
Oct 23: -$137M

BlackRock -$254M, Fidelity -$217M

Monthly flow now -$174M negative.

But good news: Swiss approved retail BTC ETF!

Institutional exit = retail opportunity?

#ETF #BitcoinETFs

Spot $BTC ETF just staged a lightning-fast reversal: on 10/22, net outflows reached $635.5 million (according to SoSoValue), the largest single-day retreat since 6/25. That gave back more than half of the $1.08 billion in inflows over the previous three consecutive days, turning October’s cumulative flows negative at -$174.5 million. BlackRock’s IBIT led the outflows at -$254 million, followed by Fidelity’s FBTC at -$217.5 million. DWF Labs’ research makes for sobering reading: when ETF flows fall about 7% from their 20-day high (the current threshold is around $80,470), they enter the selling zone. BTC had just fallen from $84,800 to $81,000 on 10/21, putting it right on the threshold’s edge. Institutional money comes fast and leaves even faster. Whether $80,000 holds will be decided this weekend. #BTC #ETF

Came across this on Bitcoin Magazine: Franklin Templeton’s two ETFs that automatically use dividends to buy Bitcoin have taken another step forward — they filed Form 8-A on 10/22 to prepare for a Nasdaq listing, with the prospectus stating an effective date of 10/27.

The key details: FBEQ tracks a U.S. large-cap 500-style index and charges a 0.09% fee; FIBT tracks an Innovation 100-style index and charges a 0.19% fee. They start with about 95% stocks and 5% Bitcoin exposure. Ordinary and special dividends from the stocks are reinvested in Bitcoin at the market open on the day after the ex-dividend date (through ETPs, futures, etc.—not by directly holding coins on-chain). At quarterly rebalancing, if the Bitcoin allocation exceeds 5%, it is trimmed back to 4.5%; if it rises above 20% in the meantime, it is forcibly rebalanced. Form 8-A is a listing-registration step; it does not mean the ETFs are already on sale, nor does it mean the SEC has “approved” them.

This is unrelated to the earlier addition to sgBENJI on XRPL — this time, it’s a U.S. stocks-and-Bitcoin package you can buy in a brokerage account, aiming to quietly turn dividend income into a BTC position.

$BTC #ETF #FranklinTempleton

Bitcoin Is Under Pressure Again. Are ETF Flows a Signal Worth Watching?

Bitcoin weakened again to around US$80,700, according to the October 24 market report.

One figure that drew attention was the roughly US$636 million in outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs on Thursday.

But it’s important to distinguish one thing: ETF outflows don’t automatically mean that all institutional investors are abandoning Bitcoin.

To assess the situation, there are three things I think are worth monitoring:

1. Do the outflows continue?
One day of data isn’t enough to confirm a trend change. Consistent fund flows would provide stronger context.

2. How is BTC’s price responding?
Will selling pressure continue, or can the price hold up despite weaker fund flows?

3. What are overall market conditions like?
Macroeconomic factors, liquidity, and leveraged positions can also affect price movements.

For now, this data is worth watching, but it’s not enough to draw conclusions about Bitcoin’s next direction.

Which do you think matters more right now: ETF flows or BTC’s price structure?

Source: The Economic Times, October 24, 2026; ETF flow data for Thursday. The price is a snapshot from the report, not a real-time quote.

#bitcoin #BTC #CryptoNews #ETF

🚀 $GBTC & $BTC IN‑KIND CREATION UNLOCKS DIRECT ENTRY FOR ELITE INVESTORS 🟢

📊 Grayscale’s new in‑kind subscription lets qualified players drop Bitcoin straight into the Mini Trust ETF, sidestepping the cash‑out step. 🦈 This trims unnecessary trades, cuts custodial friction, and preserves the raw BTC exposure on a top‑tier exchange. 🌊

⚠️ Not a universal swap button – you need accredited status, a hefty $80k‑$365k minimum, and a broker conduit. The move blurs the line between holding raw BTC and owning a regulated equity slice, hinting at deeper institutional integration. 💡

💬 Who’s ready to flip BTC into an ETF share without liquidating the underlying? 👇

⚠️ Not financial advice. Always manage your risk. 🛡️

🏷️ #GBTC #InKind #ETF #Crypto

🔥 💎

BTC is now sitting between two cost-basis levels, but the media has only reported the upper one.

Glassnode’s weekly report on October 21 (with data through October 19) estimated the average entry cost for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs at about $81,500, the average cost for corporate treasuries at about $80,200, and the True Market Mean at about $77,600. The $85,000–$87,500 range above is a supply-heavy zone.

The $81,500 level has already been breached twice. On Binance’s BTCUSDT daily chart (UTC): the October 22 close was $81,416.09, and the October 23 close was $81,189.43—both below $81,500. The October 23 low was $80,513, just $313 above $80,200.

These two levels are fundamentally different. The ETF cost basis reflects fund shareholders, whose actions are daily subscriptions and redemptions; the corporate treasury cost basis reflects publicly listed companies that issue announcements, whose actions are disclosed quarterly. The former is a flow; the latter is a stock. So a break below $81,500 proves only that “the average holder is underwater,” not that “someone is providing support.”

The leveraged side isn’t betting on a direction either. Binance USDⓈ-M futures: BTC perpetual funding rate +0.0044%/8h, equivalent to about 4.8% annualized; ETH +0.0013%/8h, equivalent to about 1.5% annualized. BTC’s mark price was $80,903, below the index price of $80,935. Longs aren’t paying a premium, and shorts haven’t dared to add to their positions.

Liquidity is more worth watching. Binance has about 760 non-stablecoin USDT pairs, with roughly $3.7 billion in actual 24-hour trading volume. Just over 40 pairs exceeded $10 million in volume, and just over 190 exceeded $1 million—which means about 74% of the remaining pairs traded less than $1 million a day. BTC and ETH together account for about 40%.

Taken together, this downturn is driven by spot selling and ETF redemptions, not leveraged liquidations. There’s no fuel for a cascade of liquidations, but there’s also no ammunition for short covering—the direction isn’t being determined by leverage, and the leverage market can’t say when things will move.

There are three counterpoints. Monthly additions to corporate treasuries have remained below one-tenth of the November 2024 peak since June—that “firmer line of defense” is backed by buyers who stopped buying a long time ago. After bids around $80,000 were wiped out on October 15, only some of them returned, and at a smaller scale than before. Also, Glassnode’s cost basis is an estimate based on data through October 19; subscriptions and redemptions over the following days will move that figure, so treating it as a fixed price level is a misuse.

If the ETF cost-basis line is only an “average,” should a break below it trigger redemptions, or attract capital into the market? What has historically determined which of those two paths prevails?

Data: ETF cost basis and flows from Glassnode’s 2026-10-21 weekly report (data through 10-19, as relayed by CryptoSlate on 10-23, using SoSoValue’s methodology); market and futures data from Binance’s public API, snapshot at 2026-10-24 08:14 CST; daily candles use UTC, current price $80,904.14. Nexo also puts the cost basis at $82,300; this article uses and attributes the Glassnode figure. This is research commentary, not investment advice.

$BTC $ETH #比特币 #ETF #资金费率 #Liquidity

　　The record of 66 consecutive trading days above the 50-day moving average is over. Bitcoin closed below the 50-day line this time, with its price around $80,600—its first break below that line since August. The price is still about 10% above the 200-day moving average, so the medium-term structure remains intact, but short-term momentum is clearly fading.

　　Selling pressure is not coming from charts alone. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw net outflows of $137.9 million on Friday, marking two consecutive trading days of outflows. Thursday’s $635.6 million outflow was the largest single-day total since June, bringing the two-day combined outflow to about $773.5 million. The simultaneous weakening of ETF flows and moving-average signals shows that real money is driving this pullback; it is not merely a technical retracement.

　　In the market, $BTC is trading around $80,838, down 1.05% within the range, with a high of $82,086 and a low of $80,451. After losing the 50-day line, short-term attention turns to the space between the $80,000 psychological level and the 200-day line. Whether ETF flows can stabilize is more worth watching than the moving averages themselves.

　　#比特币 #BTC

#ETF

📊 +$1.05 billion in two days, then −$773 million over the next two days. The week for US Bitcoin ETFs looks like a roller coaster… and yet it ends in the green.

📌 The facts (US spot Bitcoin ETFs, week of Oct. 19–23, 2026, Farside data)
• Monday 19: +$526.7M · Wednesday 21: +$524.8M
• Thursday 22: −$635.6M, the biggest single-day outflow since late June
• Friday 23: −$137.9M (BlackRock’s IBIT −$110.3M, Fidelity’s FBTC −$31.8M)
• Weekly total: +$301.2M. October total: −$313.5M after 17 trading sessions

🧠 How does it work?
An ETF is a fund traded on the stock exchange that holds actual $BTC . When investors buy shares, new shares are created and the fund generally buys bitcoin. When they sell, shares are destroyed and bitcoin may leave the fund. So heavy outflows can add selling pressure to the market.

👤 Imagine Ousmane (a fictional character), a tailor in Ouagadougou who keeps some savings in crypto. He sees “−$635M” in a big headline on Thursday and panics. But over the whole week, more money flowed in than flowed out. The day’s headline doesn’t tell the whole story.

⚖️ A few caveats
• A single day tells you almost nothing: the trend over several weeks is what matters
• Some funds report late (VanEck HODL hadn’t reported Friday yet), and figures can be revised
• Flows describe the past, not tomorrow’s price
• The Fed meeting on Oct. 28 could move things in either direction

💬 Do you check ETF flows before buying? 🟢 Yes / 🔴 Never 👇

Not financial advice. DYOR.
Sources: Farside Investors, SoSoValue (Oct. 23–24, 2026).

#Bitcoin #ETF #CryptoNews

U.S. spot $BTC ETFs saw net outflows of $635.6 million in a single day, the largest since June 25

According to Farside:
1. On October 22, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded combined net outflows of approximately $635.6 million. BlackRock IBIT saw about $254.1 million in outflows, Fidelity FBTC about $217.5 million, and ARKB about $109.4 million. Only MSBT saw a modest inflow of approximately $2.3 million.
2. On October 23, they recorded another approximately $137.9 million in net outflows. Over the same period, $ETH spot ETFs saw approximately $110.6 million in net outflows on October 22 (industry figures).
3. Spot $BTC has recently hovered around $80,800, with short-term volatility in institutional fund flows increasing.

For informational purposes only; this is not investment advice. DYOR. Use official channels only, and don't click unfamiliar claim links.
#比特币 #ETF #以太坊 #MarketUpdate

Capital can change its mind in an instant: on Thursday, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $635.6 million in net outflows—the biggest exodus since June. BlackRock’s IBIT alone shed $254.1 million, Fidelity’s FBTC saw $217.5 million in outflows, and ARKB lost $109.4 million. The day before, they had just posted a record $528.4 million in daily inflows. More than $1 billion flowed in over three days, and most of it was wiped out in a single day, pushing October’s cumulative flows back into negative territory.

It was the same story for ETH: spot Ether ETFs saw $110.5 million in net outflows on Thursday, with $75.45 million of that coming from BlackRock’s ETHA. BTC is holding firm around $81,000, but $300–400 million in positions were liquidated across the crypto market in the past 24 hours, 90% of them longs.

Institutional sentiment is a genuine barometer: even three consecutive days of 00M+ in inflows couldn’t keep the market steady, showing that this rally was driven purely by ETF flows. When the money pulls out, prices collapse. The Nasdaq fell 2.6% in a single day, led lower by AI stocks, as risk assets were sold off across the board.

Whether the $80,000 level holds depends on whether inflows return on the next inflow day. If it breaks, $70,000 is likely next.$BTC #比特币 #ETF

Just finished crunching the numbers for this week’s U.S. spot BTC ETFs, and the more I look, the crazier it gets: the market saw net inflows of $301 million for the week. Sounds decent, right? But when you dig into the numbers, it was all BlackRock’s IBIT doing the heavy lifting—it brought in $566 million on its own, while all the other funds combined actually lost $265 million. On Monday, IBIT alone pulled in $665 million; then on Thursday and Friday, it shed $365 million. The whole market saw $773 million flee over those two days, and $BTC still didn’t break $80K. This isn’t institutional consensus—it’s one giant holding the whole market up. Sound off in the comments: A) Without BlackRock, the market would’ve crashed already this week. B) One player can’t carry the load forever; next week, it’ll be their turn to run.

#比特币 #ETF #BlackRock
$BTC $ETH $SOL

On October 24, analyst Darkfost noted that U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded combined net inflows of around 5,183 BTC this week. The amount wasn’t especially large, but the overall direction for the week was still positive.

The annual tally is more significant. For much of 2026, cumulative net flows for these ETFs remained negative. Thanks to recent inflows, net inflows since January have reached around 10,784 BTC, bringing the year-to-date figure back into positive territory. Although Thursday saw a large single-day outflow of around $600 million, the week as a whole still ended with net inflows—a single day’s noise and the weekly tally are not the same thing.

Dollar-denominated data from Farside Investors tells the same story for the week: net inflows of around $301 million, with BlackRock’s IBIT attracting about $566 million in inflows over the week, offsetting outflows from other products. $BTC Fund flows are back in focus; looking at the weekly and annual tallies together gives a clearer picture than focusing on a single day.

#BTC #ETF #行情 This is not investment advice