Sharing a P2P scam attempt I recently encountered because the red flags are worth knowing.
I was selling USDT through Binance P2P when the buyer contacted me on WhatsApp and asked me to “verify my USDT.”
I told him I didn’t know how to do it and asked him to cancel the order.
Instead, he said it would only take a few minutes and told me to download Trust Wallet. He even offered to guide me through it on a call.
That felt suspicious, so I refused.
Then he tried to convince me by saying, “Everyone asks for it now because there are lots of scams happening. If you sell to someone else, they will also ask for it. The rules have changed.”
Rather than following his instructions, I contacted Binance Customer Support and explained everything. They told me not to do it.
After that, the buyer sent a payment screenshot in the Binance chat and marked the payment as completed.
But the screenshot itself had mismatched details:
• Different date • Different name • Different amount
I knew it was fake and did not release my USDT.
The order timer eventually ran out. Since this was the first time I had faced something like this, I contacted Binance Support again, explained the situation, and they helped me resolve it.
Sharing this because the red flags came one after another:
Yesterday the CLARITY Act vote gave the crypto market another reason to de-risk.
The Senate needed 60 votes to advance it, but the vote ended 49–50. BTC reacted almost immediately and the broader market followed.
Now the attention shifts to the Fed.
Today is FOMC, and honestly, I think the rate decision itself may not be the most interesting part. The market has already spent days positioning around it.
What matters to me is what comes after the announcement.
Does Warsh sound more concerned about inflation? Does the Fed leave the door open for more restrictive policy? Or does the market hear enough to start pricing a softer path?
That difference could matter more for BTC than the headline rate decision.
I'm watching BTC, the dollar and Treasury yields together. If yields and the dollar push higher after the announcement, risk assets could remain under pressure. If they cool off, BTC could get some relief.
Yesterday was a regulatory shock.
Today we get the macro test.
I wouldn't be surprised to see some crazy volatility around the announcement, including a move in one direction followed by a reversal.
For me, the important trade isn't predicting the first candle. It's seeing where BTC settles after the noise.
$RED is green. felt like that needed saying. 😄 up 8.5% today, high of $0.1645, now at $0.1433. RedStone is the 4th largest blockchain oracle, securing $6.5B+ across 70+ chains.
Guys, I'm literally a little cautious about the next 48 hours.
Not because I think crypto is going up or down…
But because we're about to get two huge catalysts almost back-to-back.
Today, the Senate votes on advancing the CLARITY Act — 60 votes are needed, and the result could change the tone around U.S. crypto regulation.
Tomorrow, the Fed makes its move.
A 25 bps hike is heavily expected, so I'm less interested in the hike itself and MUCH more interested in the dot plot and what the Fed says about future hikes.
That's why I'm saying:
Please be careful with leverage.
The next 48 hours could give us some absolutely crazy BTC and altcoin candles.
Bitcoin Just Did Something It's Only Supposed To Do Once Every Month And A Half. It's Now Done It Three Times In Four Weeks.
On September 11, Two Of Bitcoin's Biggest Mining Pools, Antpool And Spiderpool, Both Found A Valid Block At The Exact Same Height, Basically Two Answers To The Same Math Problem, Submitted At Almost The Same Second. For A Brief Moment, The Network Had Two Competing Versions Of "The Truth." Antpool's Version Ended Up Winning Because It Accumulated More Proof-Of-Work, And Spiderpool's Block Got Discarded Entirely, Along With Whatever Was In It.
This Is Called A One-Block Reorg, And Normally It's Genuinely Rare, Happening Roughly Once Every 45 Days Under Normal Network Conditions. This Was Bitcoin's Third One In A Single Month, Following Similar Events On August 16 And August 24.
Here's Why That Matters, And Why It Doesn't, At The Same Time. Galaxy Research, Who Documented All Three Events, Is Calling This "Common," Not Alarming, One-Block Reorgs Like This Resolve Harmlessly And Don't Indicate Any Actual Attack. But Three Happening In One Month, When You'd Normally Expect Maybe One Every Month And A Half, Is Enough Of A Pattern That Researchers Are Watching Mining Pool Centralization And Block Propagation More Closely.
For Context On What "Actually Scary" Looks Like: Bitcoin SV Once Suffered A 100-Block Reorg, And Monero Saw An 18-Block Reorg More Recently. Those Are The Events That Represent Real Security Concerns, Deep Reorgs That Can Reverse Dozens Of Confirmed Transactions. What Happened Here Is Nowhere Near That Level.
So, Not A Crisis. But Not Nothing Either. Worth Knowing The Difference Between "The Network Doing Normal Network Things" And "The Network Showing Early Stress Signals," Because Right Now We're Closer To The First, But It's A Pattern Worth Watching.