📑HOW POOLS AND FARM YIELDS ARE ACTUALY GOTTEN ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• I almost aped into a 25% APY pool. Then I checked to see where the 25% was actually coming from which then led to this opinion of mine. So i recently scrolled through STONfi's pool list and saw the GRAM/JETTON pair showing a 25.0% APY which looks great until you break it down. So here's how this goes, only 1.08 percentage points of that comes from trading fees the remaining 23.07 points are reward emissions. Same story on STON/USDT 14.25% total APY, but just 0.81% is fee driven, 13.44% is reward subsidized. If you zoom out to the protocol level, the organic-fee picture becomes more clearer. STONfi's trading volume is roughly 0.446% of volume in total fees, of which the protocol itself keeps about 24.3% as revenue the rest goes to LPs. That's the real, sustainable yield floor. Everything above it in a pool's advertised APY is a reward subsidy that ends whenever the emission schedule does. None of this means these pools are bad. The reward-boosted yield is a legitimate LP strategy if you're clear about the timing. It just means the number on the pool card isn't the number that survives after the incentives. ADYOR @ston_fi