roko0905

According to Cointelegraph, Polish lawmakers have reignited the debate over cryptocurrency regulation by reintroducing a comprehensive crypto bill, following its rejection by President Karol Nawrocki. This move has heightened tensions between Nawrocki and Prime Minister Donald Tusk. The bill, known as Bill 2050, was presented by Polska2050, a member of the ruling coalition in Poland's Sejm, just days after Nawrocki vetoed a similar proposal. Despite claims from supporters like Adam Gomoła that the new bill is an "improved" version of the vetoed Bill 1424, government spokesman Adam Szłapka stated that "not even a comma" had been altered.The controversy surrounding Poland's crypto legislation unfolds as the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) is being implemented across member states, with a compliance deadline set for July 2026. Critics argue that Bill 2050 is essentially a replica of the original Bill 1424, aiming to establish the Polish Financial Supervision Authority as the primary regulator for the country's crypto asset market. Polish politician Tomasz Mentzen has criticized the previous bill as "118 pages of overregulation," especially when compared to shorter versions in other EU countries like Hungary and Romania. Mentzen expressed his disapproval on social media, mocking Tusk's assertion that the president's veto was linked to alleged "Russian mafia" involvement, and sarcastically remarked that "the bill is perfect, and anyone who thinks otherwise is funded by Putin."Government spokesman Szłapka suggested that President Nawrocki might not veto the bill this time, following a classified security briefing in parliament that reportedly provided him with comprehensive insights into the national security implications. The debate over Poland's crypto bill is significant as it sets a precedent for the implementation of the EU-wide MiCA regulation, which proposes local financial regulators take charge of market supervision. This issue is particularly relevant amid calls from some EU member states for more centralized oversight under the Paris-based European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA).In October, the Bank of France advocated for granting ESMA direct supervisory powers, warning that fragmented oversight could jeopardize the EU's financial sovereignty. However, some member states, including Malta, have resisted centralized oversight, arguing that it could introduce additional layers of supervision that might hinder market innovation. Polish economist Krzysztof Piech, a vocal critic of Poland's proposed crypto bill, has questioned the necessity of local legislation, noting that MiCA protections will be in place by 2026. While local reports indicate that Nawrocki may not veto the bill this time, there is speculation that his office has been presented with an "alternative" draft aimed at fostering more favorable market conditions. This alternative proposal reportedly seeks to align with the EU-wide MiCA framework and remove direct oversight from the local regulator.

比特幣從上週的多月低點反彈，接近92,000美元的水平，但分析師表示，短期趨勢仍然傾向於上漲——如果買家能夠重新獲得關鍵水平並恢復市場參與。比特幣目前交易約91,400美元，在從80,000美元底部反彈超過13%後，穩固在一個狹窄的區間內。比特幣必須重新奪回94,000美元到95,000美元的區間，以反轉趨勢。根據TradingView的數據，比特幣在過去幾天一直在90,300美元到92,000美元之間的狹窄區間內波動。瑞士區塊鏈公司（Swissblock）稱，當比特幣失去93,300美元的年度開盤價時，真正的崩潰開始了，並稱之爲“真正的趨勢轉變”。該公司現在識別出兩個關鍵區域：• 防禦區：83,000美元–85,000美元，比特幣必須保持在該區域以防止更深的修正。• 反轉區：94,000美元–95,000美元，只有在清晰奪回該範圍後，趨勢纔會再次轉向看漲。Glassnode的成本基礎熱圖強化了這一觀點。在93,000美元到96,000美元之間大約積累了500,000 BTC，形成了一個密集的供應集羣，必須被吸收，才能讓比特幣重新獲得動能。下一個主要障礙在100,000美元到108,000美元之間，最後一個高峯的新買家可能會在強勢中拋售。Glassnode總結了這一局面：“突破頂級買家的供應集羣是重新獲得動能以達到新的歷史高點的關鍵前提。”現貨交易量因轉賬活動下降20%而減弱。單靠價格並不是障礙。參與度纔是。比特幣的鏈上轉賬量本週下降近20%，降至870億美元（7天移動平均），顯示網絡上的經濟活動減弱。現貨交易所的交易量已降至128億美元，遠低於歷史上伴隨突破性反彈的激增。值得注意的是，比特幣反彈至91,000美元是在現貨活動沒有相應上升的情況下發生的，表明投資者的胃口減弱，投機能量有限。這種分歧表明，比特幣缺乏清除92,000美元–95,000美元阻力帶所需的交易動能。CVD信號恢復的早期跡象。儘管現貨交易量乏力，市場結構可能正在轉變。Glassnode的數據表明，比特幣的交易者累計交易量差（CVD）——一種積極買入與賣出指標——在經歷了數週的負區域後，已經回升到中性水平。如果CVD果斷轉向買方主導，分析師預計會出現類似於5月至7月的恢復階段，當時比特幣上漲32%，達到其之前的歷史高點123,000美元。比特幣接下來必須做什麼。爲了避免再次劇烈的回撤併重新建立通往六位數價格的路徑，必須滿足三個條件：重新奪回94,000美元–95,000美元以確認趨勢反轉。突破97,000美元–98,000美元，交易者將其視爲第一個真正的確認區。見證現貨市場交易量的果斷迴歸，以支持向100,000美元的移動。在此之前，比特幣仍然處於區間內，並易受新的賣壓影響。

$XRP 由區塊鏈監測平臺 Whale Alert 報告的 XRP 重大鏈上移動因其規模和來源而受到關注。根據報告，1.5 億 XRP 被轉移到一個未識別的錢包。該轉賬在執行時的價值約爲 3.17 億美元，記錄於2025年11月24日，並被歸類爲來自與 Ripple 相關的錢包。儘管此類規模的轉賬並非前所未有，但它們通常會引起關注，因爲這類移動對公司活動、財務管理和流動性狀況的看法可能產生影響。👉交易詳情該交易在 XRP 賬本上以 0.0004 個單位的最低費用執行，符合網絡的低成本設計。Whale Alert 的帖子將轉賬列爲“從 Ripple 轉至未知錢包”，這表明接收地址未在主要跟蹤系統中公開識別或標註。從已知的機構或公司錢包轉賬到未標記的賬戶通常會引發對潛在目的的質疑，尤其是當涉及數億美元的代幣時。在檢測到轉賬的那一刻，該資產的價格約爲 2.1265 美元，使總價值略高於 3.17 億美元。👉移動背後的潛在解釋儘管警報沒有解釋交易的意圖，但可能適用幾種常見場景。一種可能性是這代表了內部財務操作，例如在保管環境之間轉移資產、出於安全目的重新分配持有或爲公司活動準備儲備。這類轉賬通常在沒有外部公告的情況下進行。接收的錢包可能是 Ripple 更廣泛內部基礎設施的一部分，即使未公開標註。另一種合理的解釋是這些代幣被轉移到一個保管合作伙伴或機構實體。大型資產管理公司、金融機構或流動性提供者有時會收到高價值轉賬。這類移動可能在操作用途之前發生。由於接收賬戶沒有交易所標籤或可識別的機構標籤，因此其目的仍然不明確。進一步的可能性是該轉賬可能與場外交易安排相關。場外交易活動通常使用未公開與交易所關聯的錢包進行，高價值轉賬可能在公開市場訂單簿上沒有立即反映。在這些情況下，移動的規模並不一定意味着即將對市場產生影響。👉市場和賬本背景公共數據沒有表明該轉賬立即導致主要交易場所的異常價格波動或流動性變化。此外，鏈上指標尚未顯示來自接收地址的再分配模式，儘管隨着進一步的賬本活動發展，這種情況可能會改變。與過去類似的移動一樣，目的地錢包缺乏明確標籤意味着不能僅憑警報得出明確結論。🚀🚀🚀 關注 BE_MASTER 買聰明 💰💰💰 感謝您的工作。 😍 謝謝您。 👍 關注 BeMaster 買聰明 🚀 瞭解更多 $$$$$ 🤩 成爲大師 買聰明 💰🤩🚀🚀🚀 請點擊關注 BE MASTER 買聰明 - 謝謝。