Technical Analyst , Crypto-Educator . Post on crypto , Post on Bitcoin and alt coin. Read carefully the instructions given in the post , Do Your Own Research .
https://coinmarketcap.com/community/profile/DayaAkanurkar11/
Grab your share of 9,000 USDC rewards + 20% Cashback offer 💰 ✅ Sign up with my referral ✅ Follow my trades 100% FREE ✅ Trade & start earning 📅 Only till 13th August | Limited slots 👉 Join now: https://app.bullbit.ai/sign-up?ref=DAYA #Bullbit #Crypto #Trading
This lines up decently with the pattern we saw earlier. The measured move from the double bottom was pointing toward the mid-94s, so TP3 is still conservative relative to that.
What I like: SL is logical (under the recent low + the neckline support) Risk-reward is clean Indicator + chart pattern agreeing
What to watch: Price is still hovering just above the breakout level. A quick retest of ~91.40–91.50 and hold would be ideal. If it loses the SL zone cleanly, the setup is invalidated and the W pattern fails. Overall this looks like a solid short-term long setup on the 15m. The combination of the W structure + indicator signal makes it higher probability than either alone.
The weakness was already baked into the seed the moment it was generated years earlier.
🔴Why this does not mean the company “knew the seeds” Coinkite did not store or know anyone’s individual seed phrases. The problem was a long-standing coding error in how the random numbers were generated. Because the firmware is open-source, anyone who studied the old code carefully (and Coinkite themselves say AI tools likely helped) could discover that the randomness was broken and then compute the possible weak seeds offline. It is a serious company fault — a critical bug that existed for years — but it is not evidence that Coinkite was compromised and secretly kept a list of user seeds. If that had happened, the attack pattern would look very different.
Summary in simple terms.
✅Normal seeds → impossible to guess (too many possibilities). ✅These broken seeds → far fewer possibilities because of the firmware bug → feasible for a well-resourced attacker to calculate offline. The physical wallets stayed offline and untouched. The damage was already done at the moment the weak seed was created.
That is why this incident shocked so many people. It broke the core assumption that “if the device is offline and the seed never left it, the money is safe.” When the randomness itself is broken, that assumption fails. If you generated a seed on a Coldcard in the affected period, the only safe path is still the official one: update to the fixed firmware, create a completely new seed, and carefully move the funds. Normal, properly generated seeds on other wallets (or on fixed Coldcard firmware) remain secure.
Bottom is in October? ( In October 4year cycle completed) Read my previous post regarding this .
My 1w Head & Shoulder pattern 👇
🚨#AscendEX (formerly BitMax): ZachXBT flagged delayed/stuck withdrawals and near-empty hot wallets (missing major liquid assets like ETH, USDT, USDC, SOL) in late June 2026. The exchange then fully ceased operations effective July 1, citing MiCA (no authorization), a failed strategic liquidity deal, and broader financial/operational pressure. Automated withdrawals stopped; everything moved to manual review with no assurances on timing or full amounts.
🚨#BitMEX: Announced wind-down after 11 years (the perpetual-swap pioneer). Closing September 23, 2026. New registrations are halted; positions will be force-closed in stages. Coincided with a lawsuit alleging an “Insider Trading Desk” and an engineered server freezes to trigger liquidations.
🚨#BitMart: Just announced (July 26, 2026) an orderly wind-down after nine years. New registrations/deposits/new orders suspended immediately; all trading ends August 26; platform operations cease January 31, 2027. Withdrawals remain open (for now) with extra compliance reviews. The BMX token crashed ~58-60%. Global CEO said he was terminated and not consulted on the decision.
Last cycle it was #FTX (plus a string of others). This cycle it’s a cluster of mid-tier and legacy platforms quietly (or not-so-quietly) exiting under liquidity, regulatory (especially MiCA), and “market environment” pressure.
✅Whether this exact moment is the bottom is the classic bottom-caller’s gamble. These failures are classic late-bear / early-recovery signals (capitulation of the fringe + forced deleveraging). They remove leverage and weak hands, which is how markets heal. ✅But price confirmation still requires the usual suspects: sustained ETF inflows turning positive, long-term holder behavior shifting, and macro not delivering another leg down.