Aein 1

Brickken TVL went from $12.18M in Nov 2024 to $42.36M in Oct 2026

That’s around 248% growth.

The numbers show how far the project has come. Behind the figures, @Brickken continues building the infra needed to issue, manage & oversee tokenized RWAs.

Still watching $BKN closely

@Brickken

@Brickken

Real estate tokenization needs connected financial systems

@edwin_mata explains how blockchain can connect banks, fintechs & regulators

@Brickken helps businesses issue and manage tokenized RWAs including investor onboarding & compliance

Next step is simpler blockchain finance

$BKN

$BKN

Tokenization can connect investors with opportunities they might never have considered.

@edwin_mata explains how technology opens new paths to investment.

@Brickken builds RWA tokenization infra for issuance, onboarding and compliance.

Strong infra supports adoption.

@Brickken

Tokenization can expand a business, but it cannot replace a solid business model.

That point from @edwin_mata at @CoinFerenceX deserves more attention.

His example was a fund issuing a bond. These are traditional financial instruments. The opportunity lies in using technology to broaden investor access and automate parts of the process.

The value goes beyond putting assets onchain.

- Broader investor access, subject to eligibility requirements
- Automation across the asset lifecycle
- More efficient investor and asset management

The underlying business and legal structure still matter. Tokenization can improve how a financial structure operates, but it cannot guarantee success.

@Brickken is building the infrastructure to bring financial assets onchain.

Bullish on the rails being built for the next era of tokenized finance.

$BKN @Brickken

我們再也不會看到 $BKN 以這個價格交易了。

0.1058 美元，市值 559 萬美元。

圖表目前在這個價位附近保持穩定，但我的關注點不止於短期價格走勢。

@Brickken 正在推進 BKN 2.0，旨在支持跨鏈資本流動，並推動智能體資本市場的發展。

與此同時，Brickken 仍在持續構建其 RWA 代幣化基礎設施，涵蓋資產發行、投資者入駐、合規和資產管理。

我想看看這套基礎設施將如何轉化爲實際採用率，以及對 $BKN 的需求。

願景雄心勃勃，執行力纔是關鍵。

我看好 Brickken 的發展方向，也會密切關注。

@Brickken

$BKN @Brickken

An AI agent can have an identity and still have too much power.

The part of @Brickken’s ERC-8226 approach I find strongest is the focus on authority.

ERC-8004 provides an identity registry for agents, while ERC-8226, currently a Draft, focuses on a different question:

What is this agent actually authorized to do?

A mandate can define:

- The actions an agent can perform
- Financial limits
- How long the authority remains active
- When the mandate can be revoked
- The assets and conditions covered by that authority

ERC-8226 also defines a model where the regulated asset can verify the agent’s mandate before an agent initiated action. Asset eligibility and agent authority remain separate checks.

That separation matters.

AI agents can handle execution, but regulated markets still need a verifiable record of who authorized the action and within what limits.

@Brickken is working on that mandate layer through ERC-8226.

$BKN @Brickken

Brickken has already started to make waves in Singapore. 🇸🇬

The Singapore run started on October 3, with @Brickken on the ground through October 11.

The schedule gets especially busy from today.

@CoinFerenceX runs October 5–6 at Gardens by the Bay, with CEO @edwin_mata speaking on tokenized funds, Treasuries and private credit.

Then TOKEN2049 takes over Marina Bay Sands on October 7–8, bringing 25,000+ attendees and 7,000+ companies together.

On October 10, Brickken is hosting The RWA Paddock, a curated gathering around tokenised markets during the F1 Sprint Race.

The lineup says a lot about where @Brickken is putting its energy:

- Tokenized funds
- Private credit
- RWAs
- Institutional markets
- Tokenized private markets

Big week for Brickken in Singapore.

$BKN @Brickken

RWA is starting to look less like a narrative and more like an actual financial stack.

Seeing @Brickken among the 18 members of the @RWAFoundation fits the direction I’ve been watching across tokenization.

Think about an institution bringing a private asset onchain.

Issuing the token is only the first step.

The asset still needs compliance, investor onboarding, lifecycle management, reliable data, market infrastructure and a way to work with other systems.

That’s where I see Brickken’s role becoming more important.

@Brickken is building infrastructure for issuing and managing tokenized assets, while also working on open standards, agentic capital markets and connections with market infrastructure like @redstone_defi.

18 members, one growing RWA ecosystem.

Bullish on RWA.

$BKN

這是你的一站式數位資產與 RWA（實體資產代幣化）基礎設施。

將資產代幣化聽起來很簡單，直到你接觸到後續的一切。

你需要發行該資產、讓投資者入門、驗證誰可以參與、管理所有權、處理分配，並確保報告井然有序。

@Brickken 將這些流程整合到同一個平台中。

企業可以將不動產、基金、債券或商品等資產代幣化，啟動投資者入口網站（Investor Portal），管理 KYC/KYB，並從同一個儀表板追蹤投資者與所有權。

該平台也會在資產生命週期中自動化公司行動、分配與報告。

@Brickken 正在打造 RWA 市場所需的那種基礎設施。

@Brickken

$BKN @Brickken

Tokenization is moving into a much bigger phase.

Two recent @Brickken moves connect different parts of the same problem.

First, the partnership with @redstone_defi brings eligible tokenized assets closer to the infrastructure they need after issuance, including market data, Credora risk ratings, and T+0 settlement for supported liquidations.

Then Brickken joined @LFDecentralized to work on open standards for tokenized assets and agentic capital markets, covering areas like asset interfaces, verifiable claims, and delegated authority.

The bigger picture starts to become clearer.

- Assets need reliable market data
- Markets need risk information
- Systems need interoperability
- Agents need clear and verifiable authority

Tokenization is only one layer.

The harder part is building the infrastructure that lets tokenized assets actually move, interact, and operate across a broader financial system.

That’s the direction I’m seeing from @Brickken. It’s less about issuing assets alone and more about the infrastructure around them.

‎最佳的代幣化切分設計，建立的不止是上線當下。
‎
‎將資產上鏈，僅僅是開始。
‎
‎真正的價值來自於其周邊的一切：
‎➙ 合規
‎➙ 投資人導入
‎➙ 資產管理
‎➙ 分發
‎➙ 生命週期
‎
‎這正是 @Brickken 一直在打造的領域。
‎
‎如今 @Brickken 已入圍 @CoinGapeMedia Global Onchain Awards 的「最佳代幣化真實世界資產平台」。
‎
‎投票開放至 9 月 27 日。
‎
‎投票已完成的 @Brickken

$BKN

$BKN surpassed 28M staked.

That’s 18.7% of the total supply now locked.

Its move from $25M to $28M happened through the BKN 2.0 migration, showing the level of participation from holders as the new token infrastructure came online.

I like seeing holders choose to stay involved and put their $BKN to work.

Meanwhile, @Brickken keeps building the infrastructure around it, from compliant asset issuance and investor onboarding to lifecycle management.

RWA szn.

$BKN

October is just approaching, but @Brickken already has a solid lineup.

📍 October 3–11
@TOKEN2049 week in Singapore, with Brickken on the ground across the city.

📍 October 5–6
@CoinferenceX at Gardens by the Bay, where Brickken CEO @edwin_mata will speak about tokenized funds, Treasuries and private credit at scale.

📍 October 10
The Paddock, Brickken’s curated networking event during F1 weekend at the Mandarin Oriental.

Three different rooms. One bigger conversation around tokenized markets, RWAs and agentic capital markets.

Singapore is going to be a busy one for @Brickken

$BKN @Brickken

Tokenization is becoming harder to stop.

The SEC approved a temporary, conditional exemption that allows certain venues to facilitate permissioned onchain trading of tokenized U.S. stocks.

Temporary? Yes.
Conditional? Absolutely.

But the direction matters.

Regulators are now creating a controlled framework for tokenized securities while collecting market data to help shape future rules.

This is exactly the kind of development I’m watching around @Brickken.

@Brickken is building infrastructure around tokenization, compliance and the management of regulated digital assets.

Tokenization needs more than putting assets onchain.

The rules are starting to move.
@Brickken is building for what comes next.

$BKN has been looking good for a week now.

I’m watching the project behind it just as closely.

@Brickken keeps expanding its work around tokenized assets, compliance and programmable capital markets, while also exploring how AI agents can interact with regulated onchain infrastructure.

That combination is becoming more relevant as RWAs move from experiments toward real financial use cases.

And starting tomorrow September 16, @Brickken starts a busy day in Barcelona with @EBlockchainCon until September 17, followed by @ETHSpain_ on the same date.

$BKN is not done yet. It’s just a beginning.

@Brickken

巴塞隆納即將成為代幣化（tokenization）的重要交流聚點。

而 @Brickken 也能在家中展開這場對話。

他們將在 9 月 16–17 日於 @EBlockchainCon 出席，並於 9 月 17 日前往 @ETHSpain_，兩者都距離其巴塞隆納辦公室很近。

我喜歡這個時機。

代幣化產業已經不再只是把資產放到鏈上而已。

真正更難的是圍繞它們建立一切。

- 發行
- 合規
- 資產管理
- 分銷
- 生命週期運營

@Brickken 已經專注於這個基礎設施層，擁有 150+ 名客戶、累計代幣化價值與營運超過 6 億 6 千萬美元，並在 40+ 個國家開展業務。

所以我不太想再聽一場關於代幣化是否會發生的討論。

我想聽的是：正在打造它的人，打算如何讓它在規模化的情況下真正運作。

巴塞隆納可能就是代幣化下一階段開始成形的地方。

@Brickken $BKN

$BKN @Brickken

AI 可以執行交易。
但它不能承擔責任。

這是 Brickken 執行長 @edwin_mata 在接受 @CryptoDotNews 最新採訪中提出的觀點之一，值得更多關注。

AI 代理已經被連接到錢包、支付系統與交易基礎設施。

但當一個自主代理造成損失時，難題就來了。

誰負責？

Edwin 的立場很直接：現行法律並不承認 AI 是能夠承擔義務或法律責任的法律人格。

責任取決於授權給代理的權限。

如果投資人或機構向代理方提供了明確的授權範圍，在該授權範圍內發生不利交易，並不會自動使軟體必然負責。

更棘手的情況是，當代理超越其權限或其周邊系統失效時。

因此，可執行的界限變得至關重要。

Edwin 提到 ERC-8226，也就是所提議的《受監管代理授權標準》（Regulated Agent Mandate Standard）；它可能透過對資產、行為、交易金額、期間以及撤銷等設定限制，使「被委託的權限」能在鏈上被驗證。

我認為，這正是代理式金融（agentic finance）需要走的方向。

在未明確定義 AI 能做什麼的情況下就賦予其資本存取權，會造成嚴重的問責問題。

自主金融的未來，將不只是更少地想著要移除人類，而是更多在於讓授權可衡量、可限制、且可被驗證。

@Brickken 已經在針對這個問題打造相關基礎設施。

‎RWA成長得太快了，不能再忽視。
‎
‎市場正從早期實驗擴展到更廣泛的領域；更多真實世界資產正在上鏈，而機構參與也持續成長。
‎
‎而現在我看到 $BKN 正以很有力度的方式上漲。
‎
‎在24小時內上漲超過60%。
‎
‎當你回頭看背後的市場時，圖表就更重要了。
‎
‎隨著更多資產走上鏈路，圍繞發行、合規、投資者入門與資產管理所需的基礎設施也會同步增加。
‎
‎這正是 @Brickken 正在打造的那一層。
‎
‎ $BKN 在這裡看起來很不錯。它才剛剛開始。

@Brickken $BKN

MiCA 解決了一個問題。
它又暴露了另一個。

監管確定性很重要，但僅有確定性並不能讓市場具有競爭力。

Brickken 執行長 @edwin_mata 在他最新接受 @TheFintechTimes 的採訪中，將這一點拆解得很清楚。

對較小的加密公司而言，在 MiCA 之下運作可能會涉及高昂成本，涵蓋執照、治理、資本要求、合規人員、網路安全、報告以及持續的監督等。

這會改變競爭格局。

大型機構與既有業者通常更能吸收這些成本；而較小的公司則必須更用心思考資本效率、上市速度，甚至該在哪裡建置。

我印象最深的是 Edwin 的一句話：

「合規正逐漸成為護城河，而非基礎。」

隨著代幣化進一步推進到機構金融體系，這也變得更為重要。

@Brickken 正在打造圍繞基礎設施的解決方案，將發行、合規、投資者管理與資產生命週期整合在一起。

如今歐洲加密市場面臨一個不同的問題。

監管確定性能否與維持創新競爭所需的速度與經濟性並存？

這部分是我將持續關注的。

將資產切分（Tokenizing）並不會自動讓它擁有通往美國投資人的路徑。

這個落差很容易被忽略。

發行人可能具備創建與管理代幣化金融工具的技術，但仍需要一套獨立的監管架構，才能在美國分銷。

這正是 @Brickken x @_Issuant 合作關係發揮作用之處。

Brickken 負責基礎建設面：發行、合規執行、投資人入場（onboarding）、文件工作流程與生命週期管理。

Issuant 提供美國監管層，包括經紀自營商（broker dealer）與註冊投資顧問（registered investment advisor）的能力。

兩個不同的問題，透過單一合作連結起來。

對面向美國市場的歐洲發行人而言，這可以移除一個主要的協調層。

代幣化創造出資產。分銷則讓它到達需要去的地方。

@Brickken 正在連接雙方。

@Brickken $BKN