ROYCE_ARLO

Let’s be real for a second.

Most blockchains brag about speed. TPS numbers. Millisecond block times. Fancy dashboards with charts going up and to the right. It all sounds impressive. Until the market gets crazy.

Then everything slows down.

I’ve seen this before. Hype cycle hits. Trading volume explodes. Bots wake up. And suddenly the “high-performance” chain feels like it’s running on a toaster.

That’s the context Fogo shows up in.

Fogo is a high-performance Layer 1 built on the Solana Virtual Machine, or SVM. And the thing that makes it interesting isn’t just raw speed. It’s the obsession with predictability. Not average speed. Not peak performance during a quiet Tuesday afternoon. Predictability when things get ugly.

Because that’s when it matters.

To understand why this is a big deal, we need to rewind a bit. Back to where all this started.

When Bitcoin launched, nobody cared about high throughput. The goal was simple. Send money without a bank. That’s it. Bitcoin moves slow on purpose. Security first. Decentralization first. Performance? Secondary.

Then Ethereum came along and changed the game. Smart contracts. Programmable money. Suddenly developers could build entire applications onchain. DeFi, NFTs, DAOs. You name it.

But here’s the problem. Ethereum’s original design processes transactions one at a time. Sequential execution. Which worked fine… until it didn’t.

When demand spiked, gas fees exploded. Transactions stalled. Users complained. Developers scrambled.

That pain pushed the industry forward.

Then Solana showed up with a completely different idea. Instead of running transactions in a strict line, Solana’s Virtual Machine lets them run in parallel. If two transactions don’t touch the same state, the network processes them at the same time.

Simple idea. Big impact.

Modern CPUs have multiple cores. Why not use them? That’s what SVM does. It squeezes performance out of hardware instead of pretending we’re still in 2012.

And it works. When conditions are good, Solana processes massive throughput. Thousands of transactions per second. Sometimes more.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth. Markets aren’t “good conditions.”

Markets are chaos.

Token launches. Liquidation cascades. Meme coin manias at 3 a.m. You don’t get smooth traffic. You get spikes. Violent ones.

This is where tail latency enters the chat. And honestly, people don’t talk about this enough.

Everyone loves averages. “Average block time.” “Average confirmation.” That’s cute. But users don’t experience averages. They experience delays when the system is stressed.

That 99th percentile latency? That’s the one that hurts.

If a decentralized exchange lags during volatility, traders lose money. Slippage increases. Liquidations misfire. Arbitrage disappears. And then Crypto Twitter explodes.

Fogo looks at that mess and says, okay, what if we design around the worst-case scenario instead of the best-case demo?

That’s the thesis.

It uses SVM for parallel execution. So technically, it inherits the same performance-friendly model that made Solana stand out. Transactions declare the state they’re going to touch. The runtime schedules non-conflicting ones simultaneously. Hardware stays busy instead of waiting around.

But Fogo focuses on something deeper: reducing variability.

Not just being fast.

Being reliably fast.

That sounds subtle, but it’s not.

Think about decentralized exchanges. High-frequency traders don’t care about marketing slides. They care about whether their transaction lands exactly when they expect it to. A few hundred milliseconds can flip a profitable trade into a loss.

In derivatives markets, timing gets even more sensitive. Liquidations depend on price feeds and execution windows. If the chain hiccups, risk models break. And that’s a real headache.

Gaming? Same story. If a blockchain-based game lags, players won’t stick around. Nobody waits 10 seconds for an in-game action. They just close the tab.

So yeah, predictability matters more than people admit.

Now let’s talk trade-offs. Because there are always trade-offs.

High-performance chains usually require serious hardware. Powerful validator nodes. More CPU. More memory. That can limit who participates in consensus. And when fewer people can afford to run validators, decentralization can suffer.

Some critics argue that chasing performance pushes networks toward centralization. I get that concern. It’s not crazy.

But here’s the thing. Decentralization isn’t binary. It’s not “fully decentralized” or “fully centralized.” It’s a spectrum. The real question is whether the network balances performance gains with enough validator diversity to avoid capture.

Parallel execution also increases complexity. Scheduling conflicts, managing state access, coordinating validators. These aren’t trivial problems. Bugs in high-performance systems can get nasty fast.

So no, this isn’t easy.

And Fogo doesn’t operate in a vacuum. Ethereum is scaling aggressively with Layer 2 rollups. Modular blockchain designs separate execution from data availability and consensus. Solana itself continues improving its infrastructure.

“Fast” alone isn’t enough anymore. Everyone claims to be fast.

Fogo has to prove it can stay stable when markets go wild. That’s the real test.

There are also a few misconceptions floating around.

First, more TPS doesn’t automatically mean better user experience. I’ve seen chains push huge throughput numbers and still feel inconsistent under load. Throughput without predictability is just noise.

Second, people assume high performance automatically kills decentralization. It can. But careful network design can mitigate that risk. Hardware requirements matter, but so do governance structures, validator incentives, and ecosystem distribution.

And here’s something I find interesting. The industry is clearly moving toward specialization.

In the early days, every Layer 1 tried to be everything. Now? Not so much.

Some chains optimize for privacy. Some for censorship resistance. Some for interoperability. Fogo seems to be optimizing for performance-critical applications. And honestly, that makes sense.

Financial systems need reliable settlement. Institutions won’t tolerate random slowdowns during volatility. If you’re tokenizing real-world assets or running high-frequency DeFi strategies, you need consistency. Not vibes.

There’s another angle people don’t talk about enough. AI agents.

We’re heading toward a world where bots trade onchain automatically. Machines transacting with machines. Algorithms don’t tolerate unpredictability. They don’t “wait it out.” They fail.

If Fogo delivers low and stable tail latency, it could become attractive infrastructure for that future. Not because it’s trendy. Because it’s deterministic.

Of course, technology alone won’t guarantee success. Developers need to build on it. Liquidity needs to flow. Users need to trust it. A chain without applications is just expensive infrastructure.

But philosophically, Fogo reflects a bigger shift in blockchain design. Early networks prioritized decentralization and security above all else, even if that meant slow performance. The newer wave wants both. Strong decentralization and hardware-aligned speed.

That’s a tough balance.

If Fogo can reduce performance variance and maintain meaningful decentralization, it won’t just be “another Layer 1.” It’ll represent something more mature. A network that treats performance like part of the contract.

And I think that framing matters.

Because in finance, timing is part of the agreement. If you say settlement happens in X time, it better happen in X time. Not “usually.” Not “on average.” Every time, especially when things get messy.

Speed grabs headlines. Predictability builds trust.

If Fogo can prove it’s reliably fast when markets go into full chaos mode, that’s when it really earns attention. Until then, it’s a strong idea in a very competitive arena.

But the direction? It makes sense.

Blockchains aren’t just experiments anymore. They’re infrastructure. And infrastructure doesn’t get to panic under load.
#fogo @Fogo Official $FOGO

Let’s be honest.

Blockchain has been “about to go mainstream” for over a decade now. I’ve heard the pitch a hundred times. Faster chains. Cheaper fees. More scalable infrastructure. And yet, ask your cousin, your barber, or even most gamers what they actually use blockchain for and you’ll probably get a blank stare.

That’s the problem.

The tech got better. The adoption didn’t.

And this is where Vanar comes in. At least, that’s the bet.

Vanar is a Layer 1 blockchain powered by the VANRY token, and instead of obsessing over raw speed numbers or developer bragging rights, it focuses on something way more practical: real users. Regular people. Gamers. Brands. The next three billion consumers everyone in Web3 keeps talking about but hasn’t actually onboarded yet.

Look, the thing is, infrastructure alone doesn’t attract people. Experience does.

A Quick Reality Check on Blockchain’s Evolution

First we had Bitcoin. Digital money. Clean, simple idea. No banks. That narrative made sense.

Then Ethereum showed up and said, “What if we could program money?” Smart contracts unlocked DeFi, NFTs, token economies, DAOs. All that good stuff.

But here’s what people don’t talk about enough: as the tech got more powerful, it also got more complicated.

Gas spikes. Wallet headaches. Lost seed phrases. Bridges getting hacked. If you weren’t already deep in crypto Twitter, you probably felt lost.

So new Layer 1 chains popped up everywhere. Faster finality. Lower fees. Better throughput. And honestly? Most of them sounded the same.

Vanar tries to take a different angle. Instead of asking, “How do we beat other chains on TPS?” it asks, “How do we build something normal people actually want to use?”

That’s a much harder question.

Not Just Infrastructure. An Ecosystem.

Vanar doesn’t just sit there as a base layer waiting for someone to build something cool on top of it. It actively connects its infrastructure to real products across gaming, metaverse environments, AI integrations, eco initiatives, and brand solutions.

That matters.

When a chain controls or directly supports consumer-facing platforms, it doesn’t depend entirely on outside developers to prove its value. It can iterate faster. It can align incentives tighter. It can actually test things in the wild.

And two of the most visible pieces in its ecosystem are Virtua and VGN.

Virtua Metaverse: Where Blockchain Hides in Plain Sight

Virtua Metaverse

Now, I know what you’re thinking. “Metaverse? Didn’t that hype train crash?”

Yeah. The buzz cooled off. But immersive digital environments didn’t disappear. Gamers still hang out in virtual worlds every single day.

Virtua focuses on digital ownership, collectibles, and branded virtual spaces. The key difference? It doesn’t scream “blockchain” in your face. Users explore environments. They collect assets. They interact with branded experiences. Underneath all of that, blockchain handles ownership.

That’s the smarter play.

Most mainstream users don’t care about decentralization philosophy. They care about cool environments and real value. If blockchain works quietly in the background, friction drops. And friction kills adoption faster than anything.

VGN Games Network: Gaming Is the Real On-Ramp

VGN Games Network

If Web3 ever hits mass adoption, gaming will probably lead the charge. Period.

The global gaming industry generates more than $180 billion a year. Players already understand digital skins, in-game currencies, and cosmetic upgrades. Blockchain just adds actual ownership.

But here’s where people messed up before.

Early play-to-earn games focused way too much on token rewards. They forgot the “game” part. Once token prices dropped, players left. I’ve seen this before. It’s a cycle.

VGN tries to support developers building games where fun comes first. Ownership comes second. Token economies need to enhance gameplay, not replace it.

When players truly own their assets and can trade them freely, that shifts power. It changes incentives. It creates real digital economies. But only if the gameplay holds up.

VANRY Token: Necessary, But Not a Magic Wand

Every Layer 1 needs a native token. VANRY powers transactions, staking, governance, and ecosystem incentives inside Vanar.

Simple enough.

But let’s not pretend tokens are risk-free. Crypto markets swing hard. Speculation can drown out real utility. If price becomes the only narrative, the ecosystem suffers.

For Vanar to succeed long term, VANRY has to anchor itself in actual usage. Real transactions. Real players. Real brand integrations.

Otherwise, it’s just another ticker symbol.

AI, Eco, and Brand Integration

This part gets interesting.

Vanar doesn’t limit itself to gaming. It also positions itself across AI integration, environmental initiatives, and brand solutions.

AI plus blockchain makes sense if you think about identity and data integrity. AI systems rely on massive data sets. Blockchain can secure data trails and verify ownership. Imagine decentralized AI marketplaces where users control how their data trains models. That’s not sci-fi anymore.

Then there’s the eco angle. Blockchain energy consumption criticism still lingers in mainstream conversations. Any chain aiming for global adoption needs efficient consensus and sustainability messaging baked in. Brands won’t touch infrastructure that risks public backlash.

Speaking of brands.

This might be Vanar’s strongest card. Teams with experience in entertainment and global brand collaborations understand scale differently. Corporations don’t jump into Web3 because it’s trendy. They need compliance, predictable infrastructure, and user-friendly design.

If Vanar makes blockchain safe and invisible for brands, that’s huge.

The Hard Truth: Competition Is Brutal

Let’s not sugarcoat it.

Layer 1 competition is savage. Ethereum dominates mindshare. Solana pushes performance hard. Other chains fight aggressively for developers and liquidity.

Vanar has to prove why it deserves attention beyond marketing slides.

Execution will decide everything.

Regulation also adds pressure. Governments still debate crypto frameworks. Consumer-focused ecosystems face even more scrutiny. If you target billions of users, regulators will look closely. That’s just reality.

Misconceptions People Keep Repeating

“All Layer 1s are the same.”

Nope. Governance, ecosystem strategy, design philosophy, and target markets vary wildly.

“Blockchain gaming doesn’t work.”

It works when developers build good games first. It fails when token rewards replace gameplay.

“Metaverse is dead.”

No, the hype cooled. Virtual environments continue evolving quietly. Gamers never left.

Sometimes narratives die. Underlying technology doesn’t.

So What’s the Bigger Picture?

Adoption won’t come from crypto-native traders alone. It will come from gamers who want ownership. From brands experimenting with digital collectibles. From emerging markets where alternative financial rails actually matter.

The next billion users won’t care about consensus mechanisms. They’ll care about experience.

And honestly, that’s where I think Vanar’s thesis makes sense.

If blockchain disappears into the background and simply powers better digital experiences, people will use it without even realizing it. Just like they use TCP/IP without thinking about it.

That’s the goal.

But ambition isn’t execution. I’ve seen big promises before. Every cycle produces them.

Vanar’s real test won’t be its token price. It won’t be hype metrics. It will be whether ordinary users stick around. Whether games built on its network feel natural. Whether brands see measurable value.

If it pulls that off, it won’t just be another Layer 1.

It’ll be infrastructure people actually use.

And in Web3, that’s the only thing that matters.

#Vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

Nhìn này, blockchain chưa bao giờ được dự định sẽ cảm thấy như thế này.

Chậm. Đắt đỏ. Căng thẳng một cách kỳ lạ cho một thứ mà lẽ ra phải làm giảm ma sát trên internet.

Tôi đã quanh quẩn đủ lâu để nhớ khi việc gửi giao dịch cảm thấy hơi huyền diệu. Nhấn một nút. Boom. Xong. Không ngân hàng. Không người trung gian. Chỉ có toán học và mã đang làm việc của chúng. Cảm giác đó không kéo dài. Khi những người dùng thực sự xuất hiện, mọi thứ bắt đầu hỏng. Phí tăng vọt. Mạng bị tắc nghẽn. Các ứng dụng trông tuyệt vời trong các bản demo đã sụp đổ trong thực tế.

Nhìn này, tôi đã ở trong thế giới crypto đủ lâu để nhận ra một mô hình. Những hứa hẹn lớn. Những từ ngữ hoa mỹ. Những cuộc trò chuyện vô tận về “tương lai.” Và rồi... những người bình thường xuất hiện, nhìn một cái, và đi ngay. Đó là nơi Web3 đã bị kẹt trong nhiều năm. Mọi người đều nói họ muốn sự chấp nhận đại chúng, nhưng gần như không ai thực sự xây dựng cho điều đó.

Đó là lý do tại sao Vanar thu hút sự chú ý của tôi.

Vanar không cố gắng để ồn ào. Nó không hét lên về việc nó sẽ cứu lấy internet. Thay vào đó, nó đang làm điều gì đó ít hào nhoáng hơn nhiều và quan trọng hơn nhiều. Nó đang xây dựng một blockchain Layer 1 thực sự có ý nghĩa cho người thật. Các game thủ. Những người hâm mộ. Các thương hiệu. Những người không muốn nghĩ về ví, phí gas, hay cụm từ hạt giống mỗi năm phút.

Look, let’s be honest for a second. Most new blockchains don’t actually feel new. You read the announcement, you skim the docs, and halfway through you realize it’s the same story again. Slightly faster. Slightly cheaper. Same problems, just with better marketing.

That’s why Fogo caught my attention.

Not because it promised to “change everything” (every chain says that), but because it made a very specific, very opinionated choice: build a high-performance Layer-1 using the Solana Virtual Machine. No hedging. No half measures. Just straight up, “this is the execution model we believe in.”

And yeah, that matters more than people think.

If you’ve been around crypto long enough, you’ve seen how we got here. Bitcoin proved money could exist without permission. Cool. Ethereum took that idea and said, “What if money could run code?” Even cooler. But then reality hit. Hard. Gas fees went insane. Transactions slowed to a crawl whenever things got busy. Normal users bounced. Builders got frustrated. I’ve seen teams scrap entire product ideas just because fees made them impossible.

That pain is what pushed the industry toward two paths. One group doubled down on Layer-2s. Rollups, bridges, more complexity. The other group said, “Forget this. Let’s redesign the base layer.” Solana came out of that second camp, and whether you love it or hate it, it changed the conversation around performance.

The Solana Virtual Machine is the real heart of that change. And honestly, people still don’t talk about it enough.

Here’s the simple version. Most blockchains process transactions one at a time. Doesn’t matter if they touch totally different data. They still wait in line. It’s like forcing everyone at a grocery store to use one checkout lane even though there are ten open. Makes no sense, but that’s how legacy execution models work.

The SVM flips that on its head. Transactions say upfront what accounts they’ll touch. The runtime looks at that and goes, “Okay, these don’t conflict. Run them at the same time.” That’s it. That’s the magic. Parallel execution. Modern CPU thinking applied to blockchains. No gimmicks.

Fogo doesn’t just borrow that idea. It commits to it fully.

That’s a big deal.

Because when you build natively on the SVM, you don’t deal with translation layers or awkward compatibility hacks. You get raw performance. You get predictable execution. You get a system that scales with actual hardware instead of pretending every validator lives on a 2013 laptop.

And the results show up where users actually care. Fees stay low. Like, actually low. Not “low until the next NFT mint” low. Latency feels instant. Apps don’t fall apart the moment people start using them.

This is where my bias kicks in. I think most blockchains fail because they optimize for ideology instead of usability. Fogo clearly picks usability. That doesn’t mean decentralization doesn’t matter. It does. A lot. But decentralization that no one can afford to use isn’t winning anything.

Now, from a builder’s perspective, Fogo is interesting in a different way. The SVM programming model isn’t hand-holdy. It forces you to think. You have to be explicit about state access. You have to design with concurrency in mind. That scares some developers, especially if they’re used to the EVM world where everything just… kind of works until it doesn’t.

But here’s the thing. That explicitness is a feature, not a bug.

I’ve watched too many Ethereum apps hit invisible bottlenecks because nobody realized how much shared state they were touching. With SVM-style development, those mistakes show up early. Painful at first? Yeah. Worth it? Absolutely.

And the kinds of apps this unlocks are the ones people keep saying they want but can’t actually build on slower chains. Fully on-chain order books. Games that don’t rely on off-chain servers for basic logic. Payment systems that don’t charge more in fees than the payment itself. Even machine-to-machine transactions, which sound boring until you realize that’s where real scale lives.

Of course, it’s not all sunshine.

High-performance chains come with real trade-offs. Validators need serious hardware. That’s not nothing. Critics will say this leads to centralization, and they’re not wrong to worry. But decentralization isn’t a checkbox. It’s a balancing act. And pretending that low hardware requirements magically equal strong decentralization is one of crypto’s favorite lies.

Another challenge is ecosystem gravity. Tech alone doesn’t win. Liquidity matters. Tooling matters. Community matters. I’ve seen technically brilliant chains fade into irrelevance because nobody showed up to build. Fogo still has to prove it can attract and keep real developers, not just early hype.

There’s also this weird misconception floating around that SVM-based chains “can’t do composability.” That’s just false. They can. You just have to design for it. Parallel execution doesn’t break composability. Bad assumptions do.

Zooming out, Fogo fits neatly into where the industry’s already headed, whether people admit it or not. We’re moving away from one chain doing everything poorly. We’re moving toward specialized, high-performance base layers that can actually support real usage. Not demos. Not stress tests. Actual humans clicking buttons.

And if you think institutions, games, or serious consumer apps are going to settle for slow, expensive infrastructure long-term… I don’t know what to tell you. They won’t.

So here’s my takeaway. Fogo isn’t just another Layer-1. It’s a statement. It says blockchains don’t have to be slow to be decentralized, and they don’t have to be expensive to be secure. It won’t be easy. It won’t be perfect. But it’s aiming in the right direction.

And honestly? That alone puts it ahead of most of the field.

#fogo @Fogo Official $FOGO

Look, I’ve been around this space long enough to see the same cycle repeat itself over and over again. New blockchain launches. Big promises. Faster this. Cheaper that. Everyone swears this one is different. And then… regular people still don’t show up. That’s the part people don’t talk about enough.

That’s why Vanar actually caught my attention.

Not because it’s another Layer 1. We’ve got plenty of those already. Honestly, it’s because Vanar seems obsessed with something most chains quietly ignore. Normal users. Gamers. Brands. People who don’t want to learn what gas fees are at 2 a.m. just to click a button.

The thing is, blockchain was never supposed to feel this hard. Bitcoin was about trust. Ethereum was about programmability. Somewhere along the way, we turned Web3 into this weird maze of wallets, bridges, warnings, and pop-ups that basically scream “are you sure you know what you’re doing?” Most people don’t. And they shouldn’t have to.

Vanar starts from a different place. Instead of saying “users will figure it out,” the team seems to be saying “no, let’s just build this so people don’t need to figure anything out.” That sounds obvious. It isn’t. I’ve seen projects ignore that lesson for years.

A big reason Vanar even thinks this way is because of where the team comes from. Games. Entertainment. Brand work. Those worlds don’t care about your fancy architecture if the experience feels bad. Gamers quit instantly. Fans bounce. Brands walk away. There’s zero patience. Vanar’s tech choices feel shaped by that reality.

As a Layer 1, Vanar controls its own stack. That matters more than people realize. It means the network can focus on speed, low latency, and stable fees without duct-taping solutions on top of someone else’s system. If you’ve ever watched a game lag because a network got congested, you know how brutal that is. Immersion dies fast. Vanar seems built to avoid that mess from day one.

Where this really shows up is in the products. Take Virtua Metaverse. This isn’t some empty virtual land sale with a vague roadmap and a Discord full of hopium. Virtua feels like an actual digital world. Licensed content. Recognizable brands. Interfaces that don’t feel like homework. You’re owning assets, sure, but it doesn’t slap you in the face with “BLOCKCHAIN” every five seconds. And honestly, that’s the right move.

Then there’s VGN Games Network, which I think is underrated. Instead of every game being its own little island, VGN connects multiple games into a shared ecosystem. Same identity. Shared assets. Progress that carries over. If you’ve ever invested time or money into a game only to abandon it later, you know how painful that feels. This setup actually respects players’ time. That alone puts it ahead of most Web3 gaming experiments I’ve seen.

And it’s not just games. Vanar stretches into AI, brand tools, and even eco-focused initiatives. The AI angle makes sense. Personalized content, smarter environments, dynamic assets. Blockchain keeps ownership and transparency intact while AI does the heavy lifting. It’s a clean pairing when done right.

On the sustainability side, Vanar leans into efficiency. That matters, because let’s be real, energy use has been a real headache for blockchain’s public image. Efficient consensus, measurable impact, and practical use cases help push that conversation forward instead of pretending it doesn’t exist.

For brands, Vanar’s approach is refreshingly realistic. Companies don’t want their customers dealing with seed phrases or signing scary transactions. They want smooth experiences that feel familiar. Vanar’s infrastructure lets brands step into Web3 without dragging users through crypto culture shock. That’s how you get adoption. Quietly.

The VANRY token powers the whole thing. Fees. Security. Incentives. Nothing wild or flashy here, and honestly, that’s a good sign. When the token isn’t the entire story, it usually means the team cares more about building something that lasts than chasing short-term hype.

Now, let’s not pretend it’s all sunshine. The Layer 1 space is crowded. Brutally crowded. Attention is expensive. Adoption takes time. Markets swing. Regulations loom. I’ve seen solid projects struggle simply because timing wasn’t kind. Vanar isn’t immune to any of that.

But here’s where my bias shows. I trust teams that focus on real products more than teams that focus on narratives. I trust projects that think about users before traders. And I trust builders who understand that technology wins when people forget it’s even there.

People love to say “this is just another L1.” I don’t buy that. Another L1 doesn’t usually come with actual games, actual virtual worlds, and actual brand integrations already in motion. Another L1 doesn’t usually care this much about whether your cousin who plays games all night could use it without asking for help.

Web3 feels like it’s growing up right now. Less noise. More questions about revenue, users, and sustainability. The hype-only era is cracking. And in that shift, projects like Vanar suddenly make a lot more sense.

If blockchain ever becomes truly mainstream, it won’t be because people learned how blockchains work. It’ll be because they didn’t have to. They’ll just play, explore, collect, and interact. Vanar seems to get that. And honestly, that’s why I’m paying attention.

#Vanar @Vanarchain $VANRY

Nhìn này, các blockchain chưa bao giờ được thiết kế để cảm thấy đau đớn như vậy khi sử dụng.

Đó là điều mà mọi người không nói đủ. Dọc theo con đường nào đó, chúng ta đã thuyết phục bản thân rằng việc chờ đợi, trả phí điên rồ và chứng kiến các giao dịch thất bại chỉ là một phần của thỏa thuận. Như thể đó là một hy sinh cao đẹp cho sự phân cấp. Nói thật nhé? Hầu hết người dùng không quan tâm. Họ chỉ muốn mọi thứ hoạt động.

Đó là lý do tại sao các dự án như Fogo thậm chí còn tồn tại ngay từ đầu.

Tôi đã thấy chu kỳ này trước đây. Công nghệ mới ra mắt. Những người tiên phong chấp nhận những khuyết điểm. Sau đó, những người bình thường xuất hiện và nói, “Tại sao cái này chậm?” hoặc “Tại sao cái này lại tốn của tôi 40 đô la?” Và đột nhiên, những lý do cũ không còn hiệu nghiệm nữa.

Nhìn kìa, tôi đã ở trong thế giới crypto đủ lâu để biết khi nào điều gì đó cảm thấy thực và khi nào chỉ là tiếng ồn được trang điểm bằng những từ ngữ hoa mỹ. Và thực sự, hầu hết các blockchain đều nói rất lớn về “sự chấp nhận đại chúng” trong khi âm thầm xây dựng những thứ mà chỉ những người trong crypto mới chạm vào. Đó là điều mà không ai thích thừa nhận. Web3 cứ nói rằng nó dành cho tất cả mọi người, nhưng hiếm khi hành động như vậy.

Đó là lý do tại sao Vanar thu hút sự chú ý của tôi.

Không phải vì nó hứa hẹn những điều lớn lao. Không phải vì một con số TPS điên rồ nào đó được dán lên một trang đích. Mà vì toàn bộ ý tưởng đằng sau nó cảm thấy thực tế. Gần như nhàm chán theo cách tốt. Được xây dựng cho những người thực. Sản phẩm thực. Sử dụng thực. Và đúng, tôi đã thấy cách tiếp cận này trước đây trong Web2. Thông thường, đó là những thứ thực sự bền vững.

Hãy xem nếu bạn đã ở quanh crypto đủ lâu, bạn đã nghe những lời hứa giống nhau nhiều lần. Nhanh. Rẻ. Có thể mở rộng. Lần này thì khác. Phần lớn thời gian? Nó không phải vậy. Tôi đã thấy bộ phim này trước đây và thực sự nó trở nên nhàm chán.

Nhưng thi thoảng có điều gì đó xuất hiện khiến bạn ít nhất phải tạm dừng giữa lúc lăn mắt. Đó là lúc Fogo xuất hiện.

Về cơ bản, Fogo là một blockchain Layer-1 hiệu suất cao chạy trên Máy ảo Solana hoặc SVM. Và vâng, câu đó nghe đã giống như tiếp thị. Hãy ở lại với tôi. Vấn đề là những vấn đề mà Fogo đang cố gắng giải quyết là rất thực và mọi người không nói về chúng đủ.

Nhìn xem, tôi đã trải qua crypto đủ lâu để thấy cùng một bộ phim phát lại nhiều lần. Những lời hứa lớn. Những từ công nghệ hào nhoáng. Mọi người nói “sự chấp nhận đại chúng” như thể chỉ cách một tính năng. Và rồi… chẳng có gì. Người dùng rời bỏ. Phí tăng vọt. Trải nghiệm người dùng bị hỏng. Câu chuyện như nhau.

Đó là lý do tại sao Vanar thực sự thu hút sự chú ý của tôi. Không phải vì nó tuyên bố là nhanh nhất hay rẻ nhất hoặc bất kỳ từ buzz nào đang thịnh hành tuần này, mà vì nó bắt đầu từ một câu hỏi mà hầu hết các blockchain kỳ quái bỏ qua.

Tại sao những người bình thường lại muốn sử dụng cái này?