theUnrealTrader

$TRUMP
Xin chào mọi người,Một công dân Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ vừa nộp đơn khiếu nại chống lại Tổng thống Hoa Kỳ Donald Trump và vợ ông, Melania Trump, cáo buộc gian lận tiền điện tử liên quan đến memecoin $TRUMP và $MELANIAMột công dân Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ đã nộp đơn khiếu nại chống lại cựu Tổng thống Hoa Kỳ Donald Trump và vợ ông, Melania Trump, cáo buộc gian lận tiền điện tử. Khiếu nại tập trung vào memecoin TRUMP và MELANIA, mà cặp đôi này bị cáo buộc đã ra mắt ngay trước lễ nhậm chức của Trump, tạo ra sự cường điệu đáng kể trong số các nhà đầu tư ¹.

With the cryptocurrency’s Iran-war rally, bitcoin continues to flip-flop between performing like a safe haven and a risk asset.
Key Takeaways
Bitcoin has risen by 17% since the start of the conflict in Iran, breaking away from the correlation with tech stocks seen last year, while outperforming gold.
Cryptocurrencies’ correlation with equities is unstable and rises in periods of market stress, undermining its diversification case.
With no clear valuation model, bitcoin remains driven by liquidity, flows, and shifting narratives.
Bitcoin has an asset-allocation identity crisis.
For many years, bitcoin was seen as a useful portfolio diversifier in times of turmoil thanks in part to its outsider history. Then, for a time in 2022 and 2025, bitcoin was trading almost in lockstep with technology stocks, making it a “risk asset,” in Wall Street jargon. But when the Iran war broke out, bitcoin rallied—even as investors bailed out of stocks and gold.
At various times in its history, bitcoin has been described as a digital alternative to gold, an inflation hedge, a diversifier, and a liquidity proxy.
To some observers, a rally in bitcoin after the start of the Iran war had once more reinforced its role as a safe haven. But bitcoin continued to gain even as investors decided that the war was on a path to resolution and moved back into risk assets along with stocks.
The latest episode also suggests that bitcoin is still searching for its identity: Is it a safe haven, a risk asset, or something else entirely?
Bitcoin Price Since the Outbreak of War in Iran
The Puzzle of Bitcoin Correlation
Recent data underscores just how unstable bitcoin’s relationship with traditional assets has been. A key concept here is correlation, the extent to which securities move in similar or different directions. A correlation of 1 means the investments always move in the same direction and a correlation of -1 means investments always move in the opposite direction. A coefficient of 0 indicates that there is no correlation between the two investments.
Bitcoin’s correlation with global equities has hovered around 0.50 so far in 2026, much higher than the pre-2020 norms, when it often approached zero, but also well above the rate recorded in 2023, which stood at 0.11.
That suggests an increasing connection to broader market risks. Yet the relationship is far from constant.
#warimpactsoncrypto #WarOnCrypto #Politics

After a sharp slide towards USD 60,000, investors focus on the price impact of regulation, monetary policy, and the US midterms.
Key Takeaways
Bitcoin has fallen around 25% in 2026, but bullish institutional investors argue the current “crypto winter” looks cyclical rather than structural.
US regulation, Federal Reserve policy, and the November midterm elections are expected to be the biggest catalysts for bitcoin in the second half of 2026.
While retail investors have shifted toward AI, analysts say institutions continue accumulating BTC.
Has bitcoin finally found its floor, or is the worst still to come? Analysts are focused on a few key forces: US regulation, Federal Reserve policy, and November’s midterm elections.
After surging above USD 126,000 in October 2025, the world’s largest cryptocurrency has shed around 25% this year, briefly testing the USD 60,000 threshold.
The selloff has erased much of the optimism sparked last year by spot ETFs and growing institutional adoption. That said, some analysts argue this is less a structural breakdown and more likely just another chapter in bitcoin’s familiar boom-and-bust cycle.
Another Crypto Crash: Is This Time Different?
Unlike previous crypto crashes that were triggered by failures within the digital-asset ecosystem, the latest selloff has largely been driven by macroeconomic forces. Higher bond yields, tighter financial conditions, and a broad retreat from risk assets have weighed on cryptocurrencies alongside equities, analysts say.
The latest selling pressure has been amplified by a sustained exodus from US-domiciled spot crypto ETFs, which have seen USD 2.7 billion in outflows over the last six weeks through July 17, removing one of the strongest sources of demand that had fueled last year’s rally.