Coinstelegram
3.8k Bài đăng
Coinstelegram
Đã xác minh nâng cao trên SquareBáo cáo
Chặn người dùng
Coinstelegram is a leading blockchain & altcoins cryptocurrency media
0 Đang theo dõi
19.6K+ Người theo dõi
3.2K+ Đã thích
Bài đăng
Xem bản dịch
Robinhood’s Blockchain Hit $400 Million TVL in 16 Days — But Memecoins, Not RWA, Drove the SurgeRobinhood, the retail brokerage that democratized commission-free stock trading, launched its own blockchain on July 1, 2026, positioning it as infrastructure for tokenized real-world assets and around-the-clock equity trading.
Within sixteen days, the network had accumulated $312-400 million in total value locked (TVL), ranking it among crypto’s fastest-growing blockchains. Yet the narrative took an unexpected turn: memcoins, not the tokenized stocks the platform was designed to showcase, became the primary engine of this explosive growth.
The Launch: An Infrastructure Play for Financial Markets
Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum Layer 2 network built using Arbitrum Orbit technology. The infrastructure runs at 100-millisecond block times and uses ETH for transaction fees, with Robinhood subsidizing gas costs for users transacting through its branded wallet for the first 90 days. The network launched with immediate integrations to Uniswap for spot trading, Chainlink for price oracle data, and Morpho for lending — a sophisticated stack designed to support institutional-grade DeFi and tokenized asset trading.
The company’s vision was explicit: create a blockchain where equities, bonds, commodities, and other real-world assets could be tokenized and traded twenty-four hours a day without the market-hours restrictions of traditional finance. For a company serving millions of retail investors accustomed to Robinhood’s interface simplicity, the blockchain represented the next frontier in making markets permissionless and programmable.
The Memecoin Takeover
The market had other ideas. Within days, a cat-themed memecoin named CASHCAT became the dominant liquidity source on the network. CASHCAT’s name references “Cash Cat,” an identity considered by Robinhood’s founders before the company settled on the Robinhood brand — a nostalgic connection that provided thematic ammunition for community-driven promotion.
In its first week, CASHCAT surged 2,158% in value, reaching a market capitalization between $156 million and $200 million at its peak before declining sharply. Early investors who purchased stakes measured in hundreds of dollars converted those positions into seven-figure returns. One documented trader converted an $800 position into more than $1 million in profit, a narrative that rippled across crypto trading forums and accelerated retail participation.
Other memecoins followed similar trajectories. Cash Dog and Hoodrat leveraged the memecoin momentum, each attempting to capture speculative trading volume. By mid-July, weekly DEX volume on Robinhood Chain reached $5.25 billion, volumes that would be exceptional for any new network and drew comparisons to Ethereum’s early-stage activity metrics.
The Contrast: Real-World Assets Versus Speculation
The stark disparity reveals the tension underlying the network’s early success. Tokenized real-world assets — the financial products Robinhood Chain was explicitly built to support — account for only $12.8-13 million in total value. Of this, approximately $10.68 million represents tokenized equities, while the remainder is distributed among commodity tokens, tokenized ETFs, and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Meanwhile, CASHCAT alone captured 12 times more value than all tokenized stocks combined. Stablecoins — USDC, USDT, and others — dominated TVL accounting, representing approximately $260-294 million of the network’s balance sheet. This composition suggests that the network’s early users were speculative traders seeking exposure to emerging blockchain ecosystems rather than financial professionals evaluating tokenized equity infrastructure.
CEO Acknowledges the Memecoin Reality
Vlad Tenev, Robinhood’s CEO, posted on X acknowledging the memecoin phenomenon: “While we’re building robinhood chain to be the best chain for RWA … it works great for memes too.” The statement, following CASHCAT’s ascent, signaled tacit acceptance that speculative interest had become the network’s primary growth catalyst. Tenev even followed CASHCAT’s official account, further legitimizing community perception of memecoin activity as part of the broader Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
The Infrastructure Implications
Robinhood Chain achieved 3.6 million daily transactions at peak activity, executed 17 million total transactions in its opening week, and onboarded nearly 350,000 addresses. Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad that has generated billions in speculative volume, announced support for Robinhood Chain tokens, further deepening the network’s integration into memecoin trading infrastructure.
This early adoption pattern is not unprecedented. New blockchains have historically attracted speculative capital first; institutional products follow as infrastructure matures. The question facing Robinhood is whether the memecoin speculators who drove initial TVL and transaction volume will eventually transition into users of tokenized equity and real-world asset offerings.
The Path Forward
Robinhood’s blockchain has achieved exceptional early metrics. Seven-day DEX volume reached $5.25 billion, daily active addresses approached 200,000 at peak, and over 13,900 smart contracts were deployed in the opening week. Yet these statistics mask an uncomfortable reality: most activity reflects speculation rather than adoption of the infrastructure Robinhood was explicitly designed to provide.
The company faces a critical inflection point: convert speculative traders into genuine users of tokenized financial products, or accept that memecoin trading activity, while impressive, does not validate its core RWA ambitions.
Robinhood’s Blockchain Hit $400 Million TVL in 16 Days — But Memecoins, Not RWA, Drove the Surge
Robinhood, the retail brokerage that democratized commission-free stock trading, launched its own blockchain on July 1, 2026, positioning it as infrastructure for tokenized real-world assets and around-the-clock equity trading.
Within sixteen days, the network had accumulated $312-400 million in total value locked (TVL), ranking it among crypto’s fastest-growing blockchains. Yet the narrative took an unexpected turn: memcoins, not the tokenized stocks the platform was designed to showcase, became the primary engine of this explosive growth.
The Launch: An Infrastructure Play for Financial Markets
Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum Layer 2 network built using Arbitrum Orbit technology. The infrastructure runs at 100-millisecond block times and uses ETH for transaction fees, with Robinhood subsidizing gas costs for users transacting through its branded wallet for the first 90 days. The network launched with immediate integrations to Uniswap for spot trading, Chainlink for price oracle data, and Morpho for lending — a sophisticated stack designed to support institutional-grade DeFi and tokenized asset trading.
The company’s vision was explicit: create a blockchain where equities, bonds, commodities, and other real-world assets could be tokenized and traded twenty-four hours a day without the market-hours restrictions of traditional finance. For a company serving millions of retail investors accustomed to Robinhood’s interface simplicity, the blockchain represented the next frontier in making markets permissionless and programmable.
The Memecoin Takeover
The market had other ideas. Within days, a cat-themed memecoin named CASHCAT became the dominant liquidity source on the network. CASHCAT’s name references “Cash Cat,” an identity considered by Robinhood’s founders before the company settled on the Robinhood brand — a nostalgic connection that provided thematic ammunition for community-driven promotion.
In its first week, CASHCAT surged 2,158% in value, reaching a market capitalization between $156 million and $200 million at its peak before declining sharply. Early investors who purchased stakes measured in hundreds of dollars converted those positions into seven-figure returns. One documented trader converted an $800 position into more than $1 million in profit, a narrative that rippled across crypto trading forums and accelerated retail participation.
Other memecoins followed similar trajectories. Cash Dog and Hoodrat leveraged the memecoin momentum, each attempting to capture speculative trading volume. By mid-July, weekly DEX volume on Robinhood Chain reached $5.25 billion, volumes that would be exceptional for any new network and drew comparisons to Ethereum’s early-stage activity metrics.
The Contrast: Real-World Assets Versus Speculation
The stark disparity reveals the tension underlying the network’s early success. Tokenized real-world assets — the financial products Robinhood Chain was explicitly built to support — account for only $12.8-13 million in total value. Of this, approximately $10.68 million represents tokenized equities, while the remainder is distributed among commodity tokens, tokenized ETFs, and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Meanwhile, CASHCAT alone captured 12 times more value than all tokenized stocks combined. Stablecoins — USDC, USDT, and others — dominated TVL accounting, representing approximately $260-294 million of the network’s balance sheet. This composition suggests that the network’s early users were speculative traders seeking exposure to emerging blockchain ecosystems rather than financial professionals evaluating tokenized equity infrastructure.
CEO Acknowledges the Memecoin Reality
Vlad Tenev, Robinhood’s CEO, posted on X acknowledging the memecoin phenomenon: “While we’re building robinhood chain to be the best chain for RWA … it works great for memes too.” The statement, following CASHCAT’s ascent, signaled tacit acceptance that speculative interest had become the network’s primary growth catalyst. Tenev even followed CASHCAT’s official account, further legitimizing community perception of memecoin activity as part of the broader Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
The Infrastructure Implications
Robinhood Chain achieved 3.6 million daily transactions at peak activity, executed 17 million total transactions in its opening week, and onboarded nearly 350,000 addresses. Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad that has generated billions in speculative volume, announced support for Robinhood Chain tokens, further deepening the network’s integration into memecoin trading infrastructure.
This early adoption pattern is not unprecedented. New blockchains have historically attracted speculative capital first; institutional products follow as infrastructure matures. The question facing Robinhood is whether the memecoin speculators who drove initial TVL and transaction volume will eventually transition into users of tokenized equity and real-world asset offerings.
The Path Forward
Robinhood’s blockchain has achieved exceptional early metrics. Seven-day DEX volume reached $5.25 billion, daily active addresses approached 200,000 at peak, and over 13,900 smart contracts were deployed in the opening week. Yet these statistics mask an uncomfortable reality: most activity reflects speculation rather than adoption of the infrastructure Robinhood was explicitly designed to provide.
The company faces a critical inflection point: convert speculative traders into genuine users of tokenized financial products, or accept that memecoin trading activity, while impressive, does not validate its core RWA ambitions.
Within sixteen days, the network had accumulated $312-400 million in total value locked (TVL), ranking it among crypto’s fastest-growing blockchains. Yet the narrative took an unexpected turn: memcoins, not the tokenized stocks the platform was designed to showcase, became the primary engine of this explosive growth.
The Launch: An Infrastructure Play for Financial Markets
Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum Layer 2 network built using Arbitrum Orbit technology. The infrastructure runs at 100-millisecond block times and uses ETH for transaction fees, with Robinhood subsidizing gas costs for users transacting through its branded wallet for the first 90 days. The network launched with immediate integrations to Uniswap for spot trading, Chainlink for price oracle data, and Morpho for lending — a sophisticated stack designed to support institutional-grade DeFi and tokenized asset trading.
The company’s vision was explicit: create a blockchain where equities, bonds, commodities, and other real-world assets could be tokenized and traded twenty-four hours a day without the market-hours restrictions of traditional finance. For a company serving millions of retail investors accustomed to Robinhood’s interface simplicity, the blockchain represented the next frontier in making markets permissionless and programmable.
The Memecoin Takeover
The market had other ideas. Within days, a cat-themed memecoin named CASHCAT became the dominant liquidity source on the network. CASHCAT’s name references “Cash Cat,” an identity considered by Robinhood’s founders before the company settled on the Robinhood brand — a nostalgic connection that provided thematic ammunition for community-driven promotion.
In its first week, CASHCAT surged 2,158% in value, reaching a market capitalization between $156 million and $200 million at its peak before declining sharply. Early investors who purchased stakes measured in hundreds of dollars converted those positions into seven-figure returns. One documented trader converted an $800 position into more than $1 million in profit, a narrative that rippled across crypto trading forums and accelerated retail participation.
Other memecoins followed similar trajectories. Cash Dog and Hoodrat leveraged the memecoin momentum, each attempting to capture speculative trading volume. By mid-July, weekly DEX volume on Robinhood Chain reached $5.25 billion, volumes that would be exceptional for any new network and drew comparisons to Ethereum’s early-stage activity metrics.
The Contrast: Real-World Assets Versus Speculation
The stark disparity reveals the tension underlying the network’s early success. Tokenized real-world assets — the financial products Robinhood Chain was explicitly built to support — account for only $12.8-13 million in total value. Of this, approximately $10.68 million represents tokenized equities, while the remainder is distributed among commodity tokens, tokenized ETFs, and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Meanwhile, CASHCAT alone captured 12 times more value than all tokenized stocks combined. Stablecoins — USDC, USDT, and others — dominated TVL accounting, representing approximately $260-294 million of the network’s balance sheet. This composition suggests that the network’s early users were speculative traders seeking exposure to emerging blockchain ecosystems rather than financial professionals evaluating tokenized equity infrastructure.
CEO Acknowledges the Memecoin Reality
Vlad Tenev, Robinhood’s CEO, posted on X acknowledging the memecoin phenomenon: “While we’re building robinhood chain to be the best chain for RWA … it works great for memes too.” The statement, following CASHCAT’s ascent, signaled tacit acceptance that speculative interest had become the network’s primary growth catalyst. Tenev even followed CASHCAT’s official account, further legitimizing community perception of memecoin activity as part of the broader Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
The Infrastructure Implications
Robinhood Chain achieved 3.6 million daily transactions at peak activity, executed 17 million total transactions in its opening week, and onboarded nearly 350,000 addresses. Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad that has generated billions in speculative volume, announced support for Robinhood Chain tokens, further deepening the network’s integration into memecoin trading infrastructure.
This early adoption pattern is not unprecedented. New blockchains have historically attracted speculative capital first; institutional products follow as infrastructure matures. The question facing Robinhood is whether the memecoin speculators who drove initial TVL and transaction volume will eventually transition into users of tokenized equity and real-world asset offerings.
The Path Forward
Robinhood’s blockchain has achieved exceptional early metrics. Seven-day DEX volume reached $5.25 billion, daily active addresses approached 200,000 at peak, and over 13,900 smart contracts were deployed in the opening week. Yet these statistics mask an uncomfortable reality: most activity reflects speculation rather than adoption of the infrastructure Robinhood was explicitly designed to provide.
The company faces a critical inflection point: convert speculative traders into genuine users of tokenized financial products, or accept that memecoin trading activity, while impressive, does not validate its core RWA ambitions.
76
Bài viết
Xem bản dịch
Robinhood’s Blockchain Hit $400 Million TVL in 16 Days — but Memecoins, Not RWA, Drove the SurgeRobinhood, the retail brokerage that democratized commission-free stock trading, launched its own blockchain on July 1, 2026, positioning it as infrastructure for tokenized real-world assets and around-the-clock equity trading.
Within sixteen days, the network had accumulated $312-400 million in total value locked (TVL), ranking it among crypto’s fastest-growing blockchains. Yet the narrative took an unexpected turn: memcoins, not the tokenized stocks the platform was designed to showcase, became the primary engine of this explosive growth.
The Launch: An Infrastructure Play for Financial Markets
Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum Layer 2 network built using Arbitrum Orbit technology. The infrastructure runs at 100-millisecond block times and uses ETH for transaction fees, with Robinhood subsidizing gas costs for users transacting through its branded wallet for the first 90 days. The network launched with immediate integrations to Uniswap for spot trading, Chainlink for price oracle data, and Morpho for lending — a sophisticated stack designed to support institutional-grade DeFi and tokenized asset trading.
The company’s vision was explicit: create a blockchain where equities, bonds, commodities, and other real-world assets could be tokenized and traded twenty-four hours a day without the market-hours restrictions of traditional finance. For a company serving millions of retail investors accustomed to Robinhood’s interface simplicity, the blockchain represented the next frontier in making markets permissionless and programmable.
The Memecoin Takeover
The market had other ideas. Within days, a cat-themed memecoin named CASHCAT became the dominant liquidity source on the network. CASHCAT’s name references “Cash Cat,” an identity considered by Robinhood’s founders before the company settled on the Robinhood brand — a nostalgic connection that provided thematic ammunition for community-driven promotion.
In its first week, CASHCAT surged 2,158% in value, reaching a market capitalization between $156 million and $200 million at its peak before declining sharply. Early investors who purchased stakes measured in hundreds of dollars converted those positions into seven-figure returns. One documented trader converted an $800 position into more than $1 million in profit, a narrative that rippled across crypto trading forums and accelerated retail participation.
Other memecoins followed similar trajectories. Cash Dog and Hoodrat leveraged the memecoin momentum, each attempting to capture speculative trading volume. By mid-July, weekly DEX volume on Robinhood Chain reached $5.25 billion, volumes that would be exceptional for any new network and drew comparisons to Ethereum’s early-stage activity metrics.
The Contrast: Real-World Assets Versus Speculation
The stark disparity reveals the tension underlying the network’s early success. Tokenized real-world assets — the financial products Robinhood Chain was explicitly built to support — account for only $12.8-13 million in total value. Of this, approximately $10.68 million represents tokenized equities, while the remainder is distributed among commodity tokens, tokenized ETFs, and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Meanwhile, CASHCAT alone captured 12 times more value than all tokenized stocks combined. Stablecoins — USDC, USDT, and others — dominated TVL accounting, representing approximately $260-294 million of the network’s balance sheet. This composition suggests that the network’s early users were speculative traders seeking exposure to emerging blockchain ecosystems rather than financial professionals evaluating tokenized equity infrastructure.
CEO Acknowledges the Memecoin Reality
Vlad Tenev, Robinhood’s CEO, posted on X acknowledging the memecoin phenomenon: “While we’re building robinhood chain to be the best chain for RWA … it works great for memes too.” The statement, following CASHCAT’s ascent, signaled tacit acceptance that speculative interest had become the network’s primary growth catalyst. Tenev even followed CASHCAT’s official account, further legitimizing community perception of memecoin activity as part of the broader Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
The Infrastructure Implications
Robinhood Chain achieved 3.6 million daily transactions at peak activity, executed 17 million total transactions in its opening week, and onboarded nearly 350,000 addresses. Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad that has generated billions in speculative volume, announced support for Robinhood Chain tokens, further deepening the network’s integration into memecoin trading infrastructure.
This early adoption pattern is not unprecedented. New blockchains have historically attracted speculative capital first; institutional products follow as infrastructure matures. The question facing Robinhood is whether the memecoin speculators who drove initial TVL and transaction volume will eventually transition into users of tokenized equity and real-world asset offerings.
The Path Forward
Robinhood’s blockchain has achieved exceptional early metrics. Seven-day DEX volume reached $5.25 billion, daily active addresses approached 200,000 at peak, and over 13,900 smart contracts were deployed in the opening week. Yet these statistics mask an uncomfortable reality: most activity reflects speculation rather than adoption of the infrastructure Robinhood was explicitly designed to provide.
The company faces a critical inflection point: convert speculative traders into genuine users of tokenized financial products, or accept that memecoin trading activity, while impressive, does not validate its core RWA ambitions.
Robinhood’s Blockchain Hit $400 Million TVL in 16 Days — but Memecoins, Not RWA, Drove the Surge
Robinhood, the retail brokerage that democratized commission-free stock trading, launched its own blockchain on July 1, 2026, positioning it as infrastructure for tokenized real-world assets and around-the-clock equity trading.
Within sixteen days, the network had accumulated $312-400 million in total value locked (TVL), ranking it among crypto’s fastest-growing blockchains. Yet the narrative took an unexpected turn: memcoins, not the tokenized stocks the platform was designed to showcase, became the primary engine of this explosive growth.
The Launch: An Infrastructure Play for Financial Markets
Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum Layer 2 network built using Arbitrum Orbit technology. The infrastructure runs at 100-millisecond block times and uses ETH for transaction fees, with Robinhood subsidizing gas costs for users transacting through its branded wallet for the first 90 days. The network launched with immediate integrations to Uniswap for spot trading, Chainlink for price oracle data, and Morpho for lending — a sophisticated stack designed to support institutional-grade DeFi and tokenized asset trading.
The company’s vision was explicit: create a blockchain where equities, bonds, commodities, and other real-world assets could be tokenized and traded twenty-four hours a day without the market-hours restrictions of traditional finance. For a company serving millions of retail investors accustomed to Robinhood’s interface simplicity, the blockchain represented the next frontier in making markets permissionless and programmable.
The Memecoin Takeover
The market had other ideas. Within days, a cat-themed memecoin named CASHCAT became the dominant liquidity source on the network. CASHCAT’s name references “Cash Cat,” an identity considered by Robinhood’s founders before the company settled on the Robinhood brand — a nostalgic connection that provided thematic ammunition for community-driven promotion.
In its first week, CASHCAT surged 2,158% in value, reaching a market capitalization between $156 million and $200 million at its peak before declining sharply. Early investors who purchased stakes measured in hundreds of dollars converted those positions into seven-figure returns. One documented trader converted an $800 position into more than $1 million in profit, a narrative that rippled across crypto trading forums and accelerated retail participation.
Other memecoins followed similar trajectories. Cash Dog and Hoodrat leveraged the memecoin momentum, each attempting to capture speculative trading volume. By mid-July, weekly DEX volume on Robinhood Chain reached $5.25 billion, volumes that would be exceptional for any new network and drew comparisons to Ethereum’s early-stage activity metrics.
The Contrast: Real-World Assets Versus Speculation
The stark disparity reveals the tension underlying the network’s early success. Tokenized real-world assets — the financial products Robinhood Chain was explicitly built to support — account for only $12.8-13 million in total value. Of this, approximately $10.68 million represents tokenized equities, while the remainder is distributed among commodity tokens, tokenized ETFs, and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Meanwhile, CASHCAT alone captured 12 times more value than all tokenized stocks combined. Stablecoins — USDC, USDT, and others — dominated TVL accounting, representing approximately $260-294 million of the network’s balance sheet. This composition suggests that the network’s early users were speculative traders seeking exposure to emerging blockchain ecosystems rather than financial professionals evaluating tokenized equity infrastructure.
CEO Acknowledges the Memecoin Reality
Vlad Tenev, Robinhood’s CEO, posted on X acknowledging the memecoin phenomenon: “While we’re building robinhood chain to be the best chain for RWA … it works great for memes too.” The statement, following CASHCAT’s ascent, signaled tacit acceptance that speculative interest had become the network’s primary growth catalyst. Tenev even followed CASHCAT’s official account, further legitimizing community perception of memecoin activity as part of the broader Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
The Infrastructure Implications
Robinhood Chain achieved 3.6 million daily transactions at peak activity, executed 17 million total transactions in its opening week, and onboarded nearly 350,000 addresses. Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad that has generated billions in speculative volume, announced support for Robinhood Chain tokens, further deepening the network’s integration into memecoin trading infrastructure.
This early adoption pattern is not unprecedented. New blockchains have historically attracted speculative capital first; institutional products follow as infrastructure matures. The question facing Robinhood is whether the memecoin speculators who drove initial TVL and transaction volume will eventually transition into users of tokenized equity and real-world asset offerings.
The Path Forward
Robinhood’s blockchain has achieved exceptional early metrics. Seven-day DEX volume reached $5.25 billion, daily active addresses approached 200,000 at peak, and over 13,900 smart contracts were deployed in the opening week. Yet these statistics mask an uncomfortable reality: most activity reflects speculation rather than adoption of the infrastructure Robinhood was explicitly designed to provide.
The company faces a critical inflection point: convert speculative traders into genuine users of tokenized financial products, or accept that memecoin trading activity, while impressive, does not validate its core RWA ambitions.
Within sixteen days, the network had accumulated $312-400 million in total value locked (TVL), ranking it among crypto’s fastest-growing blockchains. Yet the narrative took an unexpected turn: memcoins, not the tokenized stocks the platform was designed to showcase, became the primary engine of this explosive growth.
The Launch: An Infrastructure Play for Financial Markets
Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum Layer 2 network built using Arbitrum Orbit technology. The infrastructure runs at 100-millisecond block times and uses ETH for transaction fees, with Robinhood subsidizing gas costs for users transacting through its branded wallet for the first 90 days. The network launched with immediate integrations to Uniswap for spot trading, Chainlink for price oracle data, and Morpho for lending — a sophisticated stack designed to support institutional-grade DeFi and tokenized asset trading.
The company’s vision was explicit: create a blockchain where equities, bonds, commodities, and other real-world assets could be tokenized and traded twenty-four hours a day without the market-hours restrictions of traditional finance. For a company serving millions of retail investors accustomed to Robinhood’s interface simplicity, the blockchain represented the next frontier in making markets permissionless and programmable.
The Memecoin Takeover
The market had other ideas. Within days, a cat-themed memecoin named CASHCAT became the dominant liquidity source on the network. CASHCAT’s name references “Cash Cat,” an identity considered by Robinhood’s founders before the company settled on the Robinhood brand — a nostalgic connection that provided thematic ammunition for community-driven promotion.
In its first week, CASHCAT surged 2,158% in value, reaching a market capitalization between $156 million and $200 million at its peak before declining sharply. Early investors who purchased stakes measured in hundreds of dollars converted those positions into seven-figure returns. One documented trader converted an $800 position into more than $1 million in profit, a narrative that rippled across crypto trading forums and accelerated retail participation.
Other memecoins followed similar trajectories. Cash Dog and Hoodrat leveraged the memecoin momentum, each attempting to capture speculative trading volume. By mid-July, weekly DEX volume on Robinhood Chain reached $5.25 billion, volumes that would be exceptional for any new network and drew comparisons to Ethereum’s early-stage activity metrics.
The Contrast: Real-World Assets Versus Speculation
The stark disparity reveals the tension underlying the network’s early success. Tokenized real-world assets — the financial products Robinhood Chain was explicitly built to support — account for only $12.8-13 million in total value. Of this, approximately $10.68 million represents tokenized equities, while the remainder is distributed among commodity tokens, tokenized ETFs, and U.S. Treasury bonds.
Meanwhile, CASHCAT alone captured 12 times more value than all tokenized stocks combined. Stablecoins — USDC, USDT, and others — dominated TVL accounting, representing approximately $260-294 million of the network’s balance sheet. This composition suggests that the network’s early users were speculative traders seeking exposure to emerging blockchain ecosystems rather than financial professionals evaluating tokenized equity infrastructure.
CEO Acknowledges the Memecoin Reality
Vlad Tenev, Robinhood’s CEO, posted on X acknowledging the memecoin phenomenon: “While we’re building robinhood chain to be the best chain for RWA … it works great for memes too.” The statement, following CASHCAT’s ascent, signaled tacit acceptance that speculative interest had become the network’s primary growth catalyst. Tenev even followed CASHCAT’s official account, further legitimizing community perception of memecoin activity as part of the broader Robinhood Chain ecosystem.
The Infrastructure Implications
Robinhood Chain achieved 3.6 million daily transactions at peak activity, executed 17 million total transactions in its opening week, and onboarded nearly 350,000 addresses. Pump.fun, the Solana-based memecoin launchpad that has generated billions in speculative volume, announced support for Robinhood Chain tokens, further deepening the network’s integration into memecoin trading infrastructure.
This early adoption pattern is not unprecedented. New blockchains have historically attracted speculative capital first; institutional products follow as infrastructure matures. The question facing Robinhood is whether the memecoin speculators who drove initial TVL and transaction volume will eventually transition into users of tokenized equity and real-world asset offerings.
The Path Forward
Robinhood’s blockchain has achieved exceptional early metrics. Seven-day DEX volume reached $5.25 billion, daily active addresses approached 200,000 at peak, and over 13,900 smart contracts were deployed in the opening week. Yet these statistics mask an uncomfortable reality: most activity reflects speculation rather than adoption of the infrastructure Robinhood was explicitly designed to provide.
The company faces a critical inflection point: convert speculative traders into genuine users of tokenized financial products, or accept that memecoin trading activity, while impressive, does not validate its core RWA ambitions.
145
Nền tảng Arbitrum Perpetuals Ostium chịu thiệt hại 18 triệu USD vì khai thác oracle — Một trong những vụ lớn nhất năm 2026Ostium, một sàn giao dịch phái sinh phi tập trung được xây dựng trên mạng Lớp 2 Arbitrum, đã trở thành mục tiêu của một cuộc tấn công thao túng oracle tinh vi vào ngày 15 tháng 7 năm 2026.
Cuộc tấn công đã rút cạn khoảng 18 triệu USD dưới dạng stablecoin USDC từ kho thanh khoản của nền tảng—đánh dấu một trong những vụ tấn công lớn nhất vào hạ tầng tài chính phi tập trung trong năm nay và phơi bày các lỗ hổng then chốt trong cách các giao thức blockchain bảo mật dữ liệu giá.
Cuộc tấn công: Diễn biến như thế nào
Công ty an ninh Blockaid đã phát hiện vụ xâm nhập trong vòng vài giờ sau khi vụ việc diễn ra, cho thấy một phương thức khai thác có hệ thống nhằm vào cơ chế tự động cập nhật giá của Ostium. Kẻ tấn công đã giành quyền truy cập vào một thành phần quan trọng có tên PriceUpKeep, một hợp đồng thông minh chịu trách nhiệm gửi giá của tài sản ngoài đời thực lên blockchain đúng vào các thời điểm khi lệnh giao dịch được thực hiện.
Nền tảng Arbitrum Perpetuals Ostium chịu thiệt hại 18 triệu USD vì khai thác oracle — Một trong những vụ lớn nhất năm 2026
Ostium, một sàn giao dịch phái sinh phi tập trung được xây dựng trên mạng Lớp 2 Arbitrum, đã trở thành mục tiêu của một cuộc tấn công thao túng oracle tinh vi vào ngày 15 tháng 7 năm 2026.
Cuộc tấn công đã rút cạn khoảng 18 triệu USD dưới dạng stablecoin USDC từ kho thanh khoản của nền tảng—đánh dấu một trong những vụ tấn công lớn nhất vào hạ tầng tài chính phi tập trung trong năm nay và phơi bày các lỗ hổng then chốt trong cách các giao thức blockchain bảo mật dữ liệu giá.
Cuộc tấn công: Diễn biến như thế nào
Công ty an ninh Blockaid đã phát hiện vụ xâm nhập trong vòng vài giờ sau khi vụ việc diễn ra, cho thấy một phương thức khai thác có hệ thống nhằm vào cơ chế tự động cập nhật giá của Ostium. Kẻ tấn công đã giành quyền truy cập vào một thành phần quan trọng có tên PriceUpKeep, một hợp đồng thông minh chịu trách nhiệm gửi giá của tài sản ngoài đời thực lên blockchain đúng vào các thời điểm khi lệnh giao dịch được thực hiện.
Cuộc tấn công đã rút cạn khoảng 18 triệu USD dưới dạng stablecoin USDC từ kho thanh khoản của nền tảng—đánh dấu một trong những vụ tấn công lớn nhất vào hạ tầng tài chính phi tập trung trong năm nay và phơi bày các lỗ hổng then chốt trong cách các giao thức blockchain bảo mật dữ liệu giá.
Cuộc tấn công: Diễn biến như thế nào
Công ty an ninh Blockaid đã phát hiện vụ xâm nhập trong vòng vài giờ sau khi vụ việc diễn ra, cho thấy một phương thức khai thác có hệ thống nhằm vào cơ chế tự động cập nhật giá của Ostium. Kẻ tấn công đã giành quyền truy cập vào một thành phần quan trọng có tên PriceUpKeep, một hợp đồng thông minh chịu trách nhiệm gửi giá của tài sản ngoài đời thực lên blockchain đúng vào các thời điểm khi lệnh giao dịch được thực hiện.
119
Bài viết
Nền tảng Arbitrum Perpetuals Ostium hứng chịu cuộc khai thác Oracle trị giá 18 triệu USD — Một trong những vụ lớn nhất của năm 2026…Ostium, một sàn giao dịch phái sinh phi tập trung dựa trên mạng lớp 2 Arbitrum, đã trở thành mục tiêu của một cuộc tấn công thao túng oracle tinh vi vào ngày 15/07/2026.
Cuộc tấn công đã rút khoảng 18 triệu USD stablecoin USDC từ kho quỹ thanh khoản của nền tảng — đánh dấu một trong những đợt tấn công lớn nhất nhắm vào hạ tầng DeFi trong năm nay và làm lộ các lỗ hổng then chốt trong cách mà các giao thức blockchain bảo vệ dữ liệu giá.
Cuộc tấn công: Diễn ra như thế nào
Công ty an ninh Blockaid phát hiện vụ xâm nhập trong vòng vài giờ sau khi diễn ra, cho thấy một phương thức khai thác có hệ thống nhằm vào hệ thống tự động cập nhật giá (price-feed) của Ostium. Kẻ tấn công đã giành quyền truy cập vào một thành phần quan trọng có tên PriceUpKeep, một hợp đồng thông minh chịu trách nhiệm gửi giá tài sản ngoài đời thực lên blockchain đúng vào các thời điểm khi giao dịch được thực hiện.
Nền tảng Arbitrum Perpetuals Ostium hứng chịu cuộc khai thác Oracle trị giá 18 triệu USD — Một trong những vụ lớn nhất của năm 2026…
Ostium, một sàn giao dịch phái sinh phi tập trung dựa trên mạng lớp 2 Arbitrum, đã trở thành mục tiêu của một cuộc tấn công thao túng oracle tinh vi vào ngày 15/07/2026.
Cuộc tấn công đã rút khoảng 18 triệu USD stablecoin USDC từ kho quỹ thanh khoản của nền tảng — đánh dấu một trong những đợt tấn công lớn nhất nhắm vào hạ tầng DeFi trong năm nay và làm lộ các lỗ hổng then chốt trong cách mà các giao thức blockchain bảo vệ dữ liệu giá.
Cuộc tấn công: Diễn ra như thế nào
Công ty an ninh Blockaid phát hiện vụ xâm nhập trong vòng vài giờ sau khi diễn ra, cho thấy một phương thức khai thác có hệ thống nhằm vào hệ thống tự động cập nhật giá (price-feed) của Ostium. Kẻ tấn công đã giành quyền truy cập vào một thành phần quan trọng có tên PriceUpKeep, một hợp đồng thông minh chịu trách nhiệm gửi giá tài sản ngoài đời thực lên blockchain đúng vào các thời điểm khi giao dịch được thực hiện.
Cuộc tấn công đã rút khoảng 18 triệu USD stablecoin USDC từ kho quỹ thanh khoản của nền tảng — đánh dấu một trong những đợt tấn công lớn nhất nhắm vào hạ tầng DeFi trong năm nay và làm lộ các lỗ hổng then chốt trong cách mà các giao thức blockchain bảo vệ dữ liệu giá.
Cuộc tấn công: Diễn ra như thế nào
Công ty an ninh Blockaid phát hiện vụ xâm nhập trong vòng vài giờ sau khi diễn ra, cho thấy một phương thức khai thác có hệ thống nhằm vào hệ thống tự động cập nhật giá (price-feed) của Ostium. Kẻ tấn công đã giành quyền truy cập vào một thành phần quan trọng có tên PriceUpKeep, một hợp đồng thông minh chịu trách nhiệm gửi giá tài sản ngoài đời thực lên blockchain đúng vào các thời điểm khi giao dịch được thực hiện.
198
Bài viết
Interactive Brokers Ra Mắt Mở Rộng Crypto Lớn: 9 Token Mới và Khả Năng Rút Stablecoin...Interactive Brokers, một trong những nền tảng giao dịch bán lẻ lớn nhất của Mỹ, đã thực hiện một bước quan trọng nhằm tích hợp tiền mã hóa vào cơ sở hạ tầng tài chính phổ biến. Hãng này đã công bố việc bổ sung mười hai tài sản kỹ thuật số mới vào nền tảng giao dịch và kích hoạt khả năng rút stablecoin trực tiếp — một động thái cho thấy tài chính truyền thống hiện không còn chờ đợi sự rõ ràng về quy định trước khi xây dựng “đường ray” tiền mã hóa của riêng mình.
Mở rộng này bao gồm chín token được thêm thông qua Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG và UNI) và ba token bổ sung thông qua Paxos (AAVE, UNI và PAXG), qua đó mang đến cho khách hàng của Interactive Brokers quyền truy cập trực tiếp vào một số giao thức và nền tảng DeFi (tài chính phi tập trung) đã được thiết lập vững chắc. Đáng chú ý không kém là việc kích hoạt chức năng rút stablecoin, cho phép khách hàng chuyển đổi đô la sang USDC, PYUSD hoặc RLUSD và chuyển tiền tới các ví bên ngoài ngay lập tức, 24 giờ một ngày.
Interactive Brokers Ra Mắt Mở Rộng Crypto Lớn: 9 Token Mới và Khả Năng Rút Stablecoin...
Interactive Brokers, một trong những nền tảng giao dịch bán lẻ lớn nhất của Mỹ, đã thực hiện một bước quan trọng nhằm tích hợp tiền mã hóa vào cơ sở hạ tầng tài chính phổ biến. Hãng này đã công bố việc bổ sung mười hai tài sản kỹ thuật số mới vào nền tảng giao dịch và kích hoạt khả năng rút stablecoin trực tiếp — một động thái cho thấy tài chính truyền thống hiện không còn chờ đợi sự rõ ràng về quy định trước khi xây dựng “đường ray” tiền mã hóa của riêng mình.
Mở rộng này bao gồm chín token được thêm thông qua Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG và UNI) và ba token bổ sung thông qua Paxos (AAVE, UNI và PAXG), qua đó mang đến cho khách hàng của Interactive Brokers quyền truy cập trực tiếp vào một số giao thức và nền tảng DeFi (tài chính phi tập trung) đã được thiết lập vững chắc. Đáng chú ý không kém là việc kích hoạt chức năng rút stablecoin, cho phép khách hàng chuyển đổi đô la sang USDC, PYUSD hoặc RLUSD và chuyển tiền tới các ví bên ngoài ngay lập tức, 24 giờ một ngày.
Mở rộng này bao gồm chín token được thêm thông qua Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG và UNI) và ba token bổ sung thông qua Paxos (AAVE, UNI và PAXG), qua đó mang đến cho khách hàng của Interactive Brokers quyền truy cập trực tiếp vào một số giao thức và nền tảng DeFi (tài chính phi tập trung) đã được thiết lập vững chắc. Đáng chú ý không kém là việc kích hoạt chức năng rút stablecoin, cho phép khách hàng chuyển đổi đô la sang USDC, PYUSD hoặc RLUSD và chuyển tiền tới các ví bên ngoài ngay lập tức, 24 giờ một ngày.
109
Interactive Brokers Ra Mắt Mở Rộng Crypto Lớn: 9 Token Mới và Khả Năng Rút Stablecoin...Interactive Brokers, một trong những nền tảng môi giới bán lẻ lớn nhất tại Mỹ, đã thực hiện một bước quan trọng hướng tới việc tích hợp tiền mã hóa vào hạ tầng tài chính phổ thông. Công ty thông báo bổ sung mười hai tài sản kỹ thuật số mới vào nền tảng giao dịch và kích hoạt khả năng rút stablecoin trực tiếp — một động thái cho thấy tài chính truyền thống hiện không còn chờ đợi sự rõ ràng về quy định trước khi xây dựng “đường ray” tiền mã hóa của riêng mình.
Mở rộng lần này bao gồm chín token được bổ sung thông qua Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG và UNI) và ba token bổ sung thông qua Paxos (AAVE, UNI và PAXG), giúp các khách hàng của Interactive Brokers có quyền truy cập trực tiếp vào một số giao thức và nền tảng tài chính phi tập trung (DeFi) lâu đời nhất. Quan trọng không kém là việc kích hoạt chức năng rút stablecoin, cho phép khách hàng chuyển đổi đô la sang USDC, PYUSD hoặc RLUSD và chuyển tiền sang ví bên ngoài ngay lập tức, 24 giờ mỗi ngày.
Interactive Brokers Ra Mắt Mở Rộng Crypto Lớn: 9 Token Mới và Khả Năng Rút Stablecoin...
Interactive Brokers, một trong những nền tảng môi giới bán lẻ lớn nhất tại Mỹ, đã thực hiện một bước quan trọng hướng tới việc tích hợp tiền mã hóa vào hạ tầng tài chính phổ thông. Công ty thông báo bổ sung mười hai tài sản kỹ thuật số mới vào nền tảng giao dịch và kích hoạt khả năng rút stablecoin trực tiếp — một động thái cho thấy tài chính truyền thống hiện không còn chờ đợi sự rõ ràng về quy định trước khi xây dựng “đường ray” tiền mã hóa của riêng mình.
Mở rộng lần này bao gồm chín token được bổ sung thông qua Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG và UNI) và ba token bổ sung thông qua Paxos (AAVE, UNI và PAXG), giúp các khách hàng của Interactive Brokers có quyền truy cập trực tiếp vào một số giao thức và nền tảng tài chính phi tập trung (DeFi) lâu đời nhất. Quan trọng không kém là việc kích hoạt chức năng rút stablecoin, cho phép khách hàng chuyển đổi đô la sang USDC, PYUSD hoặc RLUSD và chuyển tiền sang ví bên ngoài ngay lập tức, 24 giờ mỗi ngày.
Mở rộng lần này bao gồm chín token được bổ sung thông qua Zero Hash (AAVE, APT, CC, LDO, MON, NEAR, XPL, PAXG và UNI) và ba token bổ sung thông qua Paxos (AAVE, UNI và PAXG), giúp các khách hàng của Interactive Brokers có quyền truy cập trực tiếp vào một số giao thức và nền tảng tài chính phi tập trung (DeFi) lâu đời nhất. Quan trọng không kém là việc kích hoạt chức năng rút stablecoin, cho phép khách hàng chuyển đổi đô la sang USDC, PYUSD hoặc RLUSD và chuyển tiền sang ví bên ngoài ngay lập tức, 24 giờ mỗi ngày.
575
Tỷ lệ áp dụng Bitcoin của các ngân hàng lớn đạt 32% — Fidelity dẫn đầu khi Phố Wall chậm rãi đón nhận số hóa...Sự tham gia của ngành ngân hàng vào Bitcoin và tài sản kỹ thuật số đang tăng tốc, nhưng vẫn chưa đồng đều giữa các tổ chức tài chính toàn cầu. Chỉ số Nhận thầu Ngân hàng Bitcoin mới do Strategy Inc. công bố vào ngày 13/7/2026 cho thấy các ngân hàng lớn đang tích hợp dịch vụ tiền mã hóa với tỷ lệ áp dụng trung bình 32% — một chỉ số phản ánh cả động lực thể chế đang nổi lên và cơ hội chưa được khai thác đáng kể trong lĩnh vực này.
CEO Phong Le của Strategy cho biết:
“Việc áp dụng Bitcoin và hệ sinh thái tài sản kỹ thuật số liên quan trên các ngân hàng lớn và tổ chức tài chính đang tăng tốc, nhưng vẫn còn sớm ở mức 32%.”
Tỷ lệ áp dụng Bitcoin của các ngân hàng lớn đạt 32% — Fidelity dẫn đầu khi Phố Wall chậm rãi đón nhận số hóa...
Sự tham gia của ngành ngân hàng vào Bitcoin và tài sản kỹ thuật số đang tăng tốc, nhưng vẫn chưa đồng đều giữa các tổ chức tài chính toàn cầu. Chỉ số Nhận thầu Ngân hàng Bitcoin mới do Strategy Inc. công bố vào ngày 13/7/2026 cho thấy các ngân hàng lớn đang tích hợp dịch vụ tiền mã hóa với tỷ lệ áp dụng trung bình 32% — một chỉ số phản ánh cả động lực thể chế đang nổi lên và cơ hội chưa được khai thác đáng kể trong lĩnh vực này.
CEO Phong Le của Strategy cho biết:
“Việc áp dụng Bitcoin và hệ sinh thái tài sản kỹ thuật số liên quan trên các ngân hàng lớn và tổ chức tài chính đang tăng tốc, nhưng vẫn còn sớm ở mức 32%.”
CEO Phong Le của Strategy cho biết:
“Việc áp dụng Bitcoin và hệ sinh thái tài sản kỹ thuật số liên quan trên các ngân hàng lớn và tổ chức tài chính đang tăng tốc, nhưng vẫn còn sớm ở mức 32%.”
76
Bài viết
Việc các ngân hàng lớn áp dụng Bitcoin đạt 32% — Fidelity dẫn đầu khi Phố Wall chậm rãi đón nhận số hóa...Mức độ tham gia của lĩnh vực ngân hàng vào Bitcoin và các tài sản kỹ thuật số đang tăng tốc, nhưng vẫn phân bố không đồng đều giữa các tổ chức tài chính trên toàn cầu. Chỉ số Nhận số Bitcoin của Ngân hàng do Strategy Inc. công bố vào ngày 13/7/2026 cho thấy các ngân hàng lớn đang tích hợp các dịch vụ tiền mã hóa với tỷ lệ áp dụng trung bình 32% — một chỉ số phản ánh vừa động lực thể chế đang hình thành vừa còn nhiều cơ hội chưa được khai thác đáng kể trong lĩnh vực này.
CEO chiến lược Phong Le cho biết:
“Việc áp dụng Bitcoin và hệ sinh thái tài sản kỹ thuật số liên quan trên các ngân hàng lớn và tổ chức tài chính đang tăng tốc, nhưng vẫn còn sớm với mức 32%.”
Việc các ngân hàng lớn áp dụng Bitcoin đạt 32% — Fidelity dẫn đầu khi Phố Wall chậm rãi đón nhận số hóa...
Mức độ tham gia của lĩnh vực ngân hàng vào Bitcoin và các tài sản kỹ thuật số đang tăng tốc, nhưng vẫn phân bố không đồng đều giữa các tổ chức tài chính trên toàn cầu. Chỉ số Nhận số Bitcoin của Ngân hàng do Strategy Inc. công bố vào ngày 13/7/2026 cho thấy các ngân hàng lớn đang tích hợp các dịch vụ tiền mã hóa với tỷ lệ áp dụng trung bình 32% — một chỉ số phản ánh vừa động lực thể chế đang hình thành vừa còn nhiều cơ hội chưa được khai thác đáng kể trong lĩnh vực này.
CEO chiến lược Phong Le cho biết:
“Việc áp dụng Bitcoin và hệ sinh thái tài sản kỹ thuật số liên quan trên các ngân hàng lớn và tổ chức tài chính đang tăng tốc, nhưng vẫn còn sớm với mức 32%.”
CEO chiến lược Phong Le cho biết:
“Việc áp dụng Bitcoin và hệ sinh thái tài sản kỹ thuật số liên quan trên các ngân hàng lớn và tổ chức tài chính đang tăng tốc, nhưng vẫn còn sớm với mức 32%.”
173
Bài viết
Nghị viện châu Âu đã phê chuẩn việc quét tin nhắn hàng loạt thông qua một kẽ hở thủ tục — Đây là...Trong một trong những chiêu thức lập pháp gây tranh cãi nhất tại nghị viện châu Âu gần đây, Nghị viện châu Âu đã phê chuẩn việc khôi phục Chat Control 1.0 vào ngày 9 tháng 7 năm 2026 — một quy định cho phép các công ty công nghệ quét tin nhắn riêng tư để tìm nội dung bất hợp pháp. Kết quả bỏ phiếu gây chấn động: 314 nghị sĩ bỏ phiếu chống, vậy mà biện pháp vẫn được thông qua. Để hiểu chuyện gì đã xảy ra, cần biết cách các thủ tục nghị viện châu Âu vận hành — và vì sao các công ty công nghệ, các chuyên gia mật mã và các nhà vận động vì quyền riêng tư đang lo ngại.
Nghị viện châu Âu đã phê chuẩn việc quét tin nhắn hàng loạt thông qua một kẽ hở thủ tục — Đây là...
Trong một trong những chiêu thức lập pháp gây tranh cãi nhất tại nghị viện châu Âu gần đây, Nghị viện châu Âu đã phê chuẩn việc khôi phục Chat Control 1.0 vào ngày 9 tháng 7 năm 2026 — một quy định cho phép các công ty công nghệ quét tin nhắn riêng tư để tìm nội dung bất hợp pháp. Kết quả bỏ phiếu gây chấn động: 314 nghị sĩ bỏ phiếu chống, vậy mà biện pháp vẫn được thông qua. Để hiểu chuyện gì đã xảy ra, cần biết cách các thủ tục nghị viện châu Âu vận hành — và vì sao các công ty công nghệ, các chuyên gia mật mã và các nhà vận động vì quyền riêng tư đang lo ngại.
126
Xem bản dịch
The European Parliament Approved Mass Message Scanning Through a Procedural Loophole — Here’s Wha...In one of the most controversial parliamentary maneuvers in recent European legislative history, the European Parliament approved the reinstatement of Chat Control 1.0 on July 9, 2026 — a regulation that allows technology companies to scan private messages for illegal content. The vote outcome was stunning: 314 lawmakers voted against it, yet the measure passed anyway. Understanding how this happened requires knowing how European parliamentary procedures work — and why tech companies, cryptography experts, and privacy advocates are alarmed.
What Exactly Is Chat Control 1.0?
Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption to European privacy laws that permits messaging platforms like Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, and Skype to voluntarily scan users’ private communications. The platforms search for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) — images and videos of child exploitation — and report findings to law enforcement authorities.
The system works using hash matching, a technique that compares files against a database of known illegal content. When a match is found, the platform flags the conversation and reports it to authorities. In theory, the system focuses on already-identified abuse material, not new material.
Here’s the important distinction: platforms are allowed to scan, but they are not required to do so. It is voluntary. Additionally, services using end-to-end encryption — including WhatsApp and Signal, where the platform itself cannot see message contents — remain exempt from this rule. The company cannot scan what it cannot access.
How Did This Pass If Most Lawmakers Voted Against It?
This is where the procedural complexity becomes crucial. Chat Control 1.0 expired on April 3, 2026, after the European Parliament rejected its extension in March. The vote was decisive: 311 MEPs (Members of European Parliament) opposed renewal, 228 supported it, and 92 abstained. The matter appeared settled.
But on July 2, 2026, the European Council — representing the 27 member-state governments — unilaterally adopted Chat Control 1.0 as its official position for what is called a “second reading.” That procedural designation is the loophole. Under second-reading rules, Parliament cannot simply pass or reject a measure by a simple majority vote. Instead, lawmakers can only block or amend the Council’s proposal if they achieve an absolute majority of all 720 MEPs — meaning 361 votes are needed, not just a majority of those present.
On July 9, when the vote occurred, 607 MEPs were present and voting. Of those, 314 voted to reject the extension — a clear majority of attendees. But because 361 votes were required to block it, and only 314 were cast in opposition, the measure passed by default. The extension survived not because it won an argument, but because it cleared a procedural threshold.
The timing compounded the controversy. The vote was scheduled during the last parliamentary session before the summer recess, when attendance drops significantly. Around 112 MEPs were absent. Critics argue this wasn’t an accident — it was deliberately scheduled to minimize opposition votes.
The Democratic Problem
Privacy advocates and cybersecurity experts immediately flagged a fundamental issue: how can lawmakers who reject something democratically find it imposed through procedural maneuvering?
Former MEP Patrick Breyer, a long-time privacy advocate, stated bluntly:
“The fact that Chat Control is moving forward against the will of the majority of voting MEPs is a farce and damages democracy.” MEP Markéta Gregorová added that the move violated “our own rules of procedure” and accused the largest parliamentary bloc, the European People’s Party, of abusing its position to resurrect a proposal the Parliament had already rejected.
The paradox is stark: more lawmakers voted against Chat Control than for it. Yet it passed.
What This Means for Regular Users
If you use Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Instagram Direct Messages, Snapchat, Skype, or similar platforms in Europe, those services now have legal permission to scan your messages. The company will look for images and videos of child abuse and report them to authorities if found. Importantly, text messages are not scanned — only images and videos.
If you use WhatsApp, Signal, or other end-to-end encrypted services, your messages remain unscanned. These platforms encrypt data so thoroughly that even the company operating the service cannot see what users send to each other. Chat Control 1.0 explicitly exempts these services.
The regulation will remain in effect until April 3, 2028, while European lawmakers negotiate Chat Control 2.0 — a more permanent, more invasive framework that could potentially require scanning of encrypted messages using artificial intelligence.
The Crypto and Tech Industry Impact
The crypto community and Web3 developers view Chat Control 1.0 as a warning signal. Here’s why: the technology used to encrypt private messages is the same cryptographic foundation that secures blockchain networks and cryptocurrency wallets. If European regulators successfully mandate breaking or weakening encryption for messaging, they will create pressure to apply similar rules to cryptocurrency platforms.
Companies like Signal have already threatened to withdraw from the EU entirely if Chat Control 2.0 passes. Exodus to non-regulated jurisdictions would mean European users losing access to secure communications tools.
For artificial intelligence developers, the concern is different but related. Chat Control relies increasingly on AI systems to detect abuse material, including new or modified images the system hasn’t encountered before. The European Commission’s own testing found these AI systems produced false positives “as high as 20 percent” — meaning one in five flagged conversations were not actually illegal content. Expanding AI-based scanning creates risks of innocent users being flagged to authorities based on algorithmic error.
What’s Coming Next: Chat Control 2.0
This vote does not finalize European privacy policy. Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption. The real battle is over Chat Control 2.0 — formally called the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR) — which has been under negotiation since 2022 and remains deeply contested.
Chat Control 2.0 could require platforms to scan encrypted messages by implementing “client-side scanning” — technology that analyzes content on a user’s device before it gets encrypted. Such technology would effectively weaken end-to-end encryption, creating vulnerabilities that governments, criminals, and hackers could potentially exploit.
Negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 resume in September 2026. The vote count on Chat Control 1.0 suggests support is fragile: if lawmakers achieve even a simple majority against a permanent framework, it could be blocked.
The Bigger Picture
Chat Control 1.0’s passage through procedural maneuvering raises questions about EU decision-making. Parliamentary rules designed to protect minority interests became, in this case, a tool for passing legislation against the majority’s explicit vote. European lawmakers and analysts are asking whether procedural safeguards work as intended or whether they can be weaponized to resurrect rejected proposals.
For cryptocurrency, Web3, and privacy-focused tech companies, the message is clear: Europe’s regulatory environment continues tightening around encryption, data access, and communications privacy. Whether Chat Control 2.0 advances will depend on whether lawmakers value privacy rights or regulatory access in 2026-2027.
The European Parliament Approved Mass Message Scanning Through a Procedural Loophole — Here’s Wha...
In one of the most controversial parliamentary maneuvers in recent European legislative history, the European Parliament approved the reinstatement of Chat Control 1.0 on July 9, 2026 — a regulation that allows technology companies to scan private messages for illegal content. The vote outcome was stunning: 314 lawmakers voted against it, yet the measure passed anyway. Understanding how this happened requires knowing how European parliamentary procedures work — and why tech companies, cryptography experts, and privacy advocates are alarmed.
What Exactly Is Chat Control 1.0?
Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption to European privacy laws that permits messaging platforms like Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, and Skype to voluntarily scan users’ private communications. The platforms search for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) — images and videos of child exploitation — and report findings to law enforcement authorities.
The system works using hash matching, a technique that compares files against a database of known illegal content. When a match is found, the platform flags the conversation and reports it to authorities. In theory, the system focuses on already-identified abuse material, not new material.
Here’s the important distinction: platforms are allowed to scan, but they are not required to do so. It is voluntary. Additionally, services using end-to-end encryption — including WhatsApp and Signal, where the platform itself cannot see message contents — remain exempt from this rule. The company cannot scan what it cannot access.
How Did This Pass If Most Lawmakers Voted Against It?
This is where the procedural complexity becomes crucial. Chat Control 1.0 expired on April 3, 2026, after the European Parliament rejected its extension in March. The vote was decisive: 311 MEPs (Members of European Parliament) opposed renewal, 228 supported it, and 92 abstained. The matter appeared settled.
But on July 2, 2026, the European Council — representing the 27 member-state governments — unilaterally adopted Chat Control 1.0 as its official position for what is called a “second reading.” That procedural designation is the loophole. Under second-reading rules, Parliament cannot simply pass or reject a measure by a simple majority vote. Instead, lawmakers can only block or amend the Council’s proposal if they achieve an absolute majority of all 720 MEPs — meaning 361 votes are needed, not just a majority of those present.
On July 9, when the vote occurred, 607 MEPs were present and voting. Of those, 314 voted to reject the extension — a clear majority of attendees. But because 361 votes were required to block it, and only 314 were cast in opposition, the measure passed by default. The extension survived not because it won an argument, but because it cleared a procedural threshold.
The timing compounded the controversy. The vote was scheduled during the last parliamentary session before the summer recess, when attendance drops significantly. Around 112 MEPs were absent. Critics argue this wasn’t an accident — it was deliberately scheduled to minimize opposition votes.
The Democratic Problem
Privacy advocates and cybersecurity experts immediately flagged a fundamental issue: how can lawmakers who reject something democratically find it imposed through procedural maneuvering?
Former MEP Patrick Breyer, a long-time privacy advocate, stated bluntly:
“The fact that Chat Control is moving forward against the will of the majority of voting MEPs is a farce and damages democracy.” MEP Markéta Gregorová added that the move violated “our own rules of procedure” and accused the largest parliamentary bloc, the European People’s Party, of abusing its position to resurrect a proposal the Parliament had already rejected.
The paradox is stark: more lawmakers voted against Chat Control than for it. Yet it passed.
What This Means for Regular Users
If you use Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Instagram Direct Messages, Snapchat, Skype, or similar platforms in Europe, those services now have legal permission to scan your messages. The company will look for images and videos of child abuse and report them to authorities if found. Importantly, text messages are not scanned — only images and videos.
If you use WhatsApp, Signal, or other end-to-end encrypted services, your messages remain unscanned. These platforms encrypt data so thoroughly that even the company operating the service cannot see what users send to each other. Chat Control 1.0 explicitly exempts these services.
The regulation will remain in effect until April 3, 2028, while European lawmakers negotiate Chat Control 2.0 — a more permanent, more invasive framework that could potentially require scanning of encrypted messages using artificial intelligence.
The Crypto and Tech Industry Impact
The crypto community and Web3 developers view Chat Control 1.0 as a warning signal. Here’s why: the technology used to encrypt private messages is the same cryptographic foundation that secures blockchain networks and cryptocurrency wallets. If European regulators successfully mandate breaking or weakening encryption for messaging, they will create pressure to apply similar rules to cryptocurrency platforms.
Companies like Signal have already threatened to withdraw from the EU entirely if Chat Control 2.0 passes. Exodus to non-regulated jurisdictions would mean European users losing access to secure communications tools.
For artificial intelligence developers, the concern is different but related. Chat Control relies increasingly on AI systems to detect abuse material, including new or modified images the system hasn’t encountered before. The European Commission’s own testing found these AI systems produced false positives “as high as 20 percent” — meaning one in five flagged conversations were not actually illegal content. Expanding AI-based scanning creates risks of innocent users being flagged to authorities based on algorithmic error.
What’s Coming Next: Chat Control 2.0
This vote does not finalize European privacy policy. Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption. The real battle is over Chat Control 2.0 — formally called the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR) — which has been under negotiation since 2022 and remains deeply contested.
Chat Control 2.0 could require platforms to scan encrypted messages by implementing “client-side scanning” — technology that analyzes content on a user’s device before it gets encrypted. Such technology would effectively weaken end-to-end encryption, creating vulnerabilities that governments, criminals, and hackers could potentially exploit.
Negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 resume in September 2026. The vote count on Chat Control 1.0 suggests support is fragile: if lawmakers achieve even a simple majority against a permanent framework, it could be blocked.
The Bigger Picture
Chat Control 1.0’s passage through procedural maneuvering raises questions about EU decision-making. Parliamentary rules designed to protect minority interests became, in this case, a tool for passing legislation against the majority’s explicit vote. European lawmakers and analysts are asking whether procedural safeguards work as intended or whether they can be weaponized to resurrect rejected proposals.
For cryptocurrency, Web3, and privacy-focused tech companies, the message is clear: Europe’s regulatory environment continues tightening around encryption, data access, and communications privacy. Whether Chat Control 2.0 advances will depend on whether lawmakers value privacy rights or regulatory access in 2026-2027.
What Exactly Is Chat Control 1.0?
Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption to European privacy laws that permits messaging platforms like Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, and Skype to voluntarily scan users’ private communications. The platforms search for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) — images and videos of child exploitation — and report findings to law enforcement authorities.
The system works using hash matching, a technique that compares files against a database of known illegal content. When a match is found, the platform flags the conversation and reports it to authorities. In theory, the system focuses on already-identified abuse material, not new material.
Here’s the important distinction: platforms are allowed to scan, but they are not required to do so. It is voluntary. Additionally, services using end-to-end encryption — including WhatsApp and Signal, where the platform itself cannot see message contents — remain exempt from this rule. The company cannot scan what it cannot access.
How Did This Pass If Most Lawmakers Voted Against It?
This is where the procedural complexity becomes crucial. Chat Control 1.0 expired on April 3, 2026, after the European Parliament rejected its extension in March. The vote was decisive: 311 MEPs (Members of European Parliament) opposed renewal, 228 supported it, and 92 abstained. The matter appeared settled.
But on July 2, 2026, the European Council — representing the 27 member-state governments — unilaterally adopted Chat Control 1.0 as its official position for what is called a “second reading.” That procedural designation is the loophole. Under second-reading rules, Parliament cannot simply pass or reject a measure by a simple majority vote. Instead, lawmakers can only block or amend the Council’s proposal if they achieve an absolute majority of all 720 MEPs — meaning 361 votes are needed, not just a majority of those present.
On July 9, when the vote occurred, 607 MEPs were present and voting. Of those, 314 voted to reject the extension — a clear majority of attendees. But because 361 votes were required to block it, and only 314 were cast in opposition, the measure passed by default. The extension survived not because it won an argument, but because it cleared a procedural threshold.
The timing compounded the controversy. The vote was scheduled during the last parliamentary session before the summer recess, when attendance drops significantly. Around 112 MEPs were absent. Critics argue this wasn’t an accident — it was deliberately scheduled to minimize opposition votes.
The Democratic Problem
Privacy advocates and cybersecurity experts immediately flagged a fundamental issue: how can lawmakers who reject something democratically find it imposed through procedural maneuvering?
Former MEP Patrick Breyer, a long-time privacy advocate, stated bluntly:
“The fact that Chat Control is moving forward against the will of the majority of voting MEPs is a farce and damages democracy.” MEP Markéta Gregorová added that the move violated “our own rules of procedure” and accused the largest parliamentary bloc, the European People’s Party, of abusing its position to resurrect a proposal the Parliament had already rejected.
The paradox is stark: more lawmakers voted against Chat Control than for it. Yet it passed.
What This Means for Regular Users
If you use Gmail, Facebook Messenger, Instagram Direct Messages, Snapchat, Skype, or similar platforms in Europe, those services now have legal permission to scan your messages. The company will look for images and videos of child abuse and report them to authorities if found. Importantly, text messages are not scanned — only images and videos.
If you use WhatsApp, Signal, or other end-to-end encrypted services, your messages remain unscanned. These platforms encrypt data so thoroughly that even the company operating the service cannot see what users send to each other. Chat Control 1.0 explicitly exempts these services.
The regulation will remain in effect until April 3, 2028, while European lawmakers negotiate Chat Control 2.0 — a more permanent, more invasive framework that could potentially require scanning of encrypted messages using artificial intelligence.
The Crypto and Tech Industry Impact
The crypto community and Web3 developers view Chat Control 1.0 as a warning signal. Here’s why: the technology used to encrypt private messages is the same cryptographic foundation that secures blockchain networks and cryptocurrency wallets. If European regulators successfully mandate breaking or weakening encryption for messaging, they will create pressure to apply similar rules to cryptocurrency platforms.
Companies like Signal have already threatened to withdraw from the EU entirely if Chat Control 2.0 passes. Exodus to non-regulated jurisdictions would mean European users losing access to secure communications tools.
For artificial intelligence developers, the concern is different but related. Chat Control relies increasingly on AI systems to detect abuse material, including new or modified images the system hasn’t encountered before. The European Commission’s own testing found these AI systems produced false positives “as high as 20 percent” — meaning one in five flagged conversations were not actually illegal content. Expanding AI-based scanning creates risks of innocent users being flagged to authorities based on algorithmic error.
What’s Coming Next: Chat Control 2.0
This vote does not finalize European privacy policy. Chat Control 1.0 is a temporary exemption. The real battle is over Chat Control 2.0 — formally called the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation (CSAR) — which has been under negotiation since 2022 and remains deeply contested.
Chat Control 2.0 could require platforms to scan encrypted messages by implementing “client-side scanning” — technology that analyzes content on a user’s device before it gets encrypted. Such technology would effectively weaken end-to-end encryption, creating vulnerabilities that governments, criminals, and hackers could potentially exploit.
Negotiations on Chat Control 2.0 resume in September 2026. The vote count on Chat Control 1.0 suggests support is fragile: if lawmakers achieve even a simple majority against a permanent framework, it could be blocked.
The Bigger Picture
Chat Control 1.0’s passage through procedural maneuvering raises questions about EU decision-making. Parliamentary rules designed to protect minority interests became, in this case, a tool for passing legislation against the majority’s explicit vote. European lawmakers and analysts are asking whether procedural safeguards work as intended or whether they can be weaponized to resurrect rejected proposals.
For cryptocurrency, Web3, and privacy-focused tech companies, the message is clear: Europe’s regulatory environment continues tightening around encryption, data access, and communications privacy. Whether Chat Control 2.0 advances will depend on whether lawmakers value privacy rights or regulatory access in 2026-2027.
100
Bài viết
Xem bản dịch
Hernando De Soto Plantea Uso De Blockchain Para Impulsar La Economía Peruana: “Activos Deben Conv...Hernando de Soto plantea uso de blockchain para impulsar la economía peruana: “Activos deben convertirse en capital productivo”
Excandidato presidencial propone que títulos de las propiedades, concesiones y contratos sean cotizados como capital de inversión y de esa manera combatir la economía informal.
De Soto expondrá sus planteamientos en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026, este 11 de julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar, junto a destacados representantes de empresas líderes del ecosistema blockchain y crypto global.
Lima, Perú — El economista y excandidato presidencial, Hernando de Soto, planteó una innovadora propuesta económica orientada a la inclusión financiera de los sectores más vulnerables del país, sugiriendo el uso de la tecnología blockchain y sistemas de criptoactivos para dinamizar la economía nacional.
Según explicó De Soto, gran parte de los peruanos en situación de pobreza habitan sobre algunos de los territorios más ricos del país; sin embargo, la falta de títulos formales impide a millones de peruanos convertir sus activos -como tierras, negocios o recursos- en capital productivo, dejándolos excluidos del sistema financiero.
“Por qué, los más pobres, la mayor parte de ellos propietarios y emprendedores, se encuentran en los territorios más ricos del Perú y no pueden capitalizarse para entrar en la revolución industrial. La respuesta es que los títulos de las propiedades, las concesiones y los contratos que los vinculan al mundo, y que deberían permitirles generar capital, tienen serias limitaciones”, sostuvo De Soto, quien brindará una charla sobre este tema en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026 que se desarrollará este sábado en Lima.
Para resolver esta problemática, el economista propone que estos recursos de poco valor sean transformados en activos altamente rentables. La estrategia consiste en que, además de ser valorizados localmente, puedan ser cotizados como capital de inversión, lo que ayudará a incluir en el sistema financiero del país a millones de personas.
Perú recibirá a expertos de tecnología blockchain y ecosistema crypto
De Soto expondrá estos planteamientos durante la charla que dará en la quinta edición del Perú Blockchain Conference, evento que se realizará el 11 de Julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar en Miraflores, que contará también con entradas gratuitas por tiempo limitado. Organizado por LATAM Blockchain Events LLC, el encuentro se consolida como el evento más importante del país en crypto, blockchain, trading, activos digitales e innovación financiera, reuniendo a líderes globales de la industria, empresas tecnológicas, instituciones, inversionistas, traders, comunidades Web3 y público interesado en las nuevas tecnologías financieras.
Durante los últimos dos años, el mercado peruano ha mostrado un crecimiento sostenido en la adopción de activos digitales y tecnología blockchain, pasando de ser un simple espectador a convertirse en protagonista, posicionándose como uno de los mercados con mayor proyección en América Latina.
Según el Informe Blockchain LATAM 2025 de Sherlock Communications, el 3.7% de peruanos ya es usuario de criptomonedas, lo que equivale a más de un millón de personas, duplicando la cantidad registrada hace menos de dos años. Asimismo, el Global Crypto Adoption Index de Chainalysis coloca al país en el puesto 7 de adopción de criptomonedas a nivel regional y en el puesto 42 a nivel mundial.
A esto se suma el crecimiento del uso de stablecoins como mecanismo de resguardo, pagos internacionales y remesas digitales, especialmente en un entorno donde la eficiencia transfronteriza y la dolarización digital ganan relevancia entre usuarios y empresas. Reportes de mercado señalan que las stablecoins representan ya una parte significativa de la actividad cripto en Perú, impulsadas por la interoperabilidad entre fintechs, wallets y el sistema financiero tradicional, logrando, incluso, que el Banco Central de Reserva de Perú destaque sus ventajas tangibles frente a los sistemas tradicionales.
“Perú vive hoy uno de los momentos más importantes para la evolución del ecosistema blockchain y de activos digitales en la región. Ya no solo somos eventos; somos un puente para acelerar la adopción cripto responsable, la educación financiera y la conexión entre empresas, instituciones y comunidad. Esta quinta edición de Perú Blockchain Conference representa la consolidación de un espacio estratégico para impulsar con profesionalismo, visión regional y compromiso el crecimiento sostenible del ecosistema Web3 en el país y en Latinoamérica”, aseguró Kristopher Panana, Fundador de Perú Blockchain Conference.
Más información y entradas:Perú Blockchain Conference 2026
Hernando De Soto Plantea Uso De Blockchain Para Impulsar La Economía Peruana: “Activos Deben Conv...
Hernando de Soto plantea uso de blockchain para impulsar la economía peruana: “Activos deben convertirse en capital productivo”
Excandidato presidencial propone que títulos de las propiedades, concesiones y contratos sean cotizados como capital de inversión y de esa manera combatir la economía informal.
De Soto expondrá sus planteamientos en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026, este 11 de julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar, junto a destacados representantes de empresas líderes del ecosistema blockchain y crypto global.
Lima, Perú — El economista y excandidato presidencial, Hernando de Soto, planteó una innovadora propuesta económica orientada a la inclusión financiera de los sectores más vulnerables del país, sugiriendo el uso de la tecnología blockchain y sistemas de criptoactivos para dinamizar la economía nacional.
Según explicó De Soto, gran parte de los peruanos en situación de pobreza habitan sobre algunos de los territorios más ricos del país; sin embargo, la falta de títulos formales impide a millones de peruanos convertir sus activos -como tierras, negocios o recursos- en capital productivo, dejándolos excluidos del sistema financiero.
“Por qué, los más pobres, la mayor parte de ellos propietarios y emprendedores, se encuentran en los territorios más ricos del Perú y no pueden capitalizarse para entrar en la revolución industrial. La respuesta es que los títulos de las propiedades, las concesiones y los contratos que los vinculan al mundo, y que deberían permitirles generar capital, tienen serias limitaciones”, sostuvo De Soto, quien brindará una charla sobre este tema en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026 que se desarrollará este sábado en Lima.
Para resolver esta problemática, el economista propone que estos recursos de poco valor sean transformados en activos altamente rentables. La estrategia consiste en que, además de ser valorizados localmente, puedan ser cotizados como capital de inversión, lo que ayudará a incluir en el sistema financiero del país a millones de personas.
Perú recibirá a expertos de tecnología blockchain y ecosistema crypto
De Soto expondrá estos planteamientos durante la charla que dará en la quinta edición del Perú Blockchain Conference, evento que se realizará el 11 de Julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar en Miraflores, que contará también con entradas gratuitas por tiempo limitado. Organizado por LATAM Blockchain Events LLC, el encuentro se consolida como el evento más importante del país en crypto, blockchain, trading, activos digitales e innovación financiera, reuniendo a líderes globales de la industria, empresas tecnológicas, instituciones, inversionistas, traders, comunidades Web3 y público interesado en las nuevas tecnologías financieras.
Durante los últimos dos años, el mercado peruano ha mostrado un crecimiento sostenido en la adopción de activos digitales y tecnología blockchain, pasando de ser un simple espectador a convertirse en protagonista, posicionándose como uno de los mercados con mayor proyección en América Latina.
Según el Informe Blockchain LATAM 2025 de Sherlock Communications, el 3.7% de peruanos ya es usuario de criptomonedas, lo que equivale a más de un millón de personas, duplicando la cantidad registrada hace menos de dos años. Asimismo, el Global Crypto Adoption Index de Chainalysis coloca al país en el puesto 7 de adopción de criptomonedas a nivel regional y en el puesto 42 a nivel mundial.
A esto se suma el crecimiento del uso de stablecoins como mecanismo de resguardo, pagos internacionales y remesas digitales, especialmente en un entorno donde la eficiencia transfronteriza y la dolarización digital ganan relevancia entre usuarios y empresas. Reportes de mercado señalan que las stablecoins representan ya una parte significativa de la actividad cripto en Perú, impulsadas por la interoperabilidad entre fintechs, wallets y el sistema financiero tradicional, logrando, incluso, que el Banco Central de Reserva de Perú destaque sus ventajas tangibles frente a los sistemas tradicionales.
“Perú vive hoy uno de los momentos más importantes para la evolución del ecosistema blockchain y de activos digitales en la región. Ya no solo somos eventos; somos un puente para acelerar la adopción cripto responsable, la educación financiera y la conexión entre empresas, instituciones y comunidad. Esta quinta edición de Perú Blockchain Conference representa la consolidación de un espacio estratégico para impulsar con profesionalismo, visión regional y compromiso el crecimiento sostenible del ecosistema Web3 en el país y en Latinoamérica”, aseguró Kristopher Panana, Fundador de Perú Blockchain Conference.
Más información y entradas:Perú Blockchain Conference 2026
Excandidato presidencial propone que títulos de las propiedades, concesiones y contratos sean cotizados como capital de inversión y de esa manera combatir la economía informal.
De Soto expondrá sus planteamientos en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026, este 11 de julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar, junto a destacados representantes de empresas líderes del ecosistema blockchain y crypto global.
Lima, Perú — El economista y excandidato presidencial, Hernando de Soto, planteó una innovadora propuesta económica orientada a la inclusión financiera de los sectores más vulnerables del país, sugiriendo el uso de la tecnología blockchain y sistemas de criptoactivos para dinamizar la economía nacional.
Según explicó De Soto, gran parte de los peruanos en situación de pobreza habitan sobre algunos de los territorios más ricos del país; sin embargo, la falta de títulos formales impide a millones de peruanos convertir sus activos -como tierras, negocios o recursos- en capital productivo, dejándolos excluidos del sistema financiero.
“Por qué, los más pobres, la mayor parte de ellos propietarios y emprendedores, se encuentran en los territorios más ricos del Perú y no pueden capitalizarse para entrar en la revolución industrial. La respuesta es que los títulos de las propiedades, las concesiones y los contratos que los vinculan al mundo, y que deberían permitirles generar capital, tienen serias limitaciones”, sostuvo De Soto, quien brindará una charla sobre este tema en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026 que se desarrollará este sábado en Lima.
Para resolver esta problemática, el economista propone que estos recursos de poco valor sean transformados en activos altamente rentables. La estrategia consiste en que, además de ser valorizados localmente, puedan ser cotizados como capital de inversión, lo que ayudará a incluir en el sistema financiero del país a millones de personas.
Perú recibirá a expertos de tecnología blockchain y ecosistema crypto
De Soto expondrá estos planteamientos durante la charla que dará en la quinta edición del Perú Blockchain Conference, evento que se realizará el 11 de Julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar en Miraflores, que contará también con entradas gratuitas por tiempo limitado. Organizado por LATAM Blockchain Events LLC, el encuentro se consolida como el evento más importante del país en crypto, blockchain, trading, activos digitales e innovación financiera, reuniendo a líderes globales de la industria, empresas tecnológicas, instituciones, inversionistas, traders, comunidades Web3 y público interesado en las nuevas tecnologías financieras.
Durante los últimos dos años, el mercado peruano ha mostrado un crecimiento sostenido en la adopción de activos digitales y tecnología blockchain, pasando de ser un simple espectador a convertirse en protagonista, posicionándose como uno de los mercados con mayor proyección en América Latina.
Según el Informe Blockchain LATAM 2025 de Sherlock Communications, el 3.7% de peruanos ya es usuario de criptomonedas, lo que equivale a más de un millón de personas, duplicando la cantidad registrada hace menos de dos años. Asimismo, el Global Crypto Adoption Index de Chainalysis coloca al país en el puesto 7 de adopción de criptomonedas a nivel regional y en el puesto 42 a nivel mundial.
A esto se suma el crecimiento del uso de stablecoins como mecanismo de resguardo, pagos internacionales y remesas digitales, especialmente en un entorno donde la eficiencia transfronteriza y la dolarización digital ganan relevancia entre usuarios y empresas. Reportes de mercado señalan que las stablecoins representan ya una parte significativa de la actividad cripto en Perú, impulsadas por la interoperabilidad entre fintechs, wallets y el sistema financiero tradicional, logrando, incluso, que el Banco Central de Reserva de Perú destaque sus ventajas tangibles frente a los sistemas tradicionales.
“Perú vive hoy uno de los momentos más importantes para la evolución del ecosistema blockchain y de activos digitales en la región. Ya no solo somos eventos; somos un puente para acelerar la adopción cripto responsable, la educación financiera y la conexión entre empresas, instituciones y comunidad. Esta quinta edición de Perú Blockchain Conference representa la consolidación de un espacio estratégico para impulsar con profesionalismo, visión regional y compromiso el crecimiento sostenible del ecosistema Web3 en el país y en Latinoamérica”, aseguró Kristopher Panana, Fundador de Perú Blockchain Conference.
Más información y entradas:Perú Blockchain Conference 2026
82
Xem bản dịch
Hernando de Soto plantea uso de blockchain para impulsar la economía peruana: “Activos deben conv...Hernando de Soto plantea uso de blockchain para impulsar la economía peruana: “Activos deben convertirse en capital productivo”
Excandidato presidencial propone que títulos de las propiedades, concesiones y contratos sean cotizados como capital de inversión y de esa manera combatir la economía informal.
De Soto expondrá sus planteamientos en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026, este 11 de julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar, junto a destacados representantes de empresas líderes del ecosistema blockchain y crypto global.
Lima, Perú — El economista y excandidato presidencial, Hernando de Soto, planteó una innovadora propuesta económica orientada a la inclusión financiera de los sectores más vulnerables del país, sugiriendo el uso de la tecnología blockchain y sistemas de criptoactivos para dinamizar la economía nacional.
Según explicó De Soto, gran parte de los peruanos en situación de pobreza habitan sobre algunos de los territorios más ricos del país; sin embargo, la falta de títulos formales impide a millones de peruanos convertir sus activos -como tierras, negocios o recursos- en capital productivo, dejándolos excluidos del sistema financiero.
“Por qué, los más pobres, la mayor parte de ellos propietarios y emprendedores, se encuentran en los territorios más ricos del Perú y no pueden capitalizarse para entrar en la revolución industrial. La respuesta es que los títulos de las propiedades, las concesiones y los contratos que los vinculan al mundo, y que deberían permitirles generar capital, tienen serias limitaciones”, sostuvo De Soto, quien brindará una charla sobre este tema en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026 que se desarrollará este sábado en Lima.
Para resolver esta problemática, el economista propone que estos recursos de poco valor sean transformados en activos altamente rentables. La estrategia consiste en que, además de ser valorizados localmente, puedan ser cotizados como capital de inversión, lo que ayudará a incluir en el sistema financiero del país a millones de personas.
Perú recibirá a expertos de tecnología blockchain y ecosistema crypto
De Soto expondrá estos planteamientos durante la charla que dará en la quinta edición del Perú Blockchain Conference, evento que se realizará el 11 de Julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar en Miraflores, que contará también con entradas gratuitas por tiempo limitado. Organizado por LATAM Blockchain Events LLC, el encuentro se consolida como el evento más importante del país en crypto, blockchain, trading, activos digitales e innovación financiera, reuniendo a líderes globales de la industria, empresas tecnológicas, instituciones, inversionistas, traders, comunidades Web3 y público interesado en las nuevas tecnologías financieras.
Durante los últimos dos años, el mercado peruano ha mostrado un crecimiento sostenido en la adopción de activos digitales y tecnología blockchain, pasando de ser un simple espectador a convertirse en protagonista, posicionándose como uno de los mercados con mayor proyección en América Latina.
Según el Informe Blockchain LATAM 2025 de Sherlock Communications, el 3.7% de peruanos ya es usuario de criptomonedas, lo que equivale a más de un millón de personas, duplicando la cantidad registrada hace menos de dos años. Asimismo, el Global Crypto Adoption Index de Chainalysis coloca al país en el puesto 7 de adopción de criptomonedas a nivel regional y en el puesto 42 a nivel mundial.
A esto se suma el crecimiento del uso de stablecoins como mecanismo de resguardo, pagos internacionales y remesas digitales, especialmente en un entorno donde la eficiencia transfronteriza y la dolarización digital ganan relevancia entre usuarios y empresas. Reportes de mercado señalan que las stablecoins representan ya una parte significativa de la actividad cripto en Perú, impulsadas por la interoperabilidad entre fintechs, wallets y el sistema financiero tradicional, logrando, incluso, que el Banco Central de Reserva de Perú destaque sus ventajas tangibles frente a los sistemas tradicionales.
“Perú vive hoy uno de los momentos más importantes para la evolución del ecosistema blockchain y de activos digitales en la región. Ya no solo somos eventos; somos un puente para acelerar la adopción cripto responsable, la educación financiera y la conexión entre empresas, instituciones y comunidad. Esta quinta edición de Perú Blockchain Conference representa la consolidación de un espacio estratégico para impulsar con profesionalismo, visión regional y compromiso el crecimiento sostenible del ecosistema Web3 en el país y en Latinoamérica”, aseguró Kristopher Panana, Fundador de Perú Blockchain Conference.
Más información y entradas:
Perú Blockchain Conference 2026
Hernando de Soto plantea uso de blockchain para impulsar la economía peruana: “Activos deben conv...
Hernando de Soto plantea uso de blockchain para impulsar la economía peruana: “Activos deben convertirse en capital productivo”
Excandidato presidencial propone que títulos de las propiedades, concesiones y contratos sean cotizados como capital de inversión y de esa manera combatir la economía informal.
De Soto expondrá sus planteamientos en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026, este 11 de julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar, junto a destacados representantes de empresas líderes del ecosistema blockchain y crypto global.
Lima, Perú — El economista y excandidato presidencial, Hernando de Soto, planteó una innovadora propuesta económica orientada a la inclusión financiera de los sectores más vulnerables del país, sugiriendo el uso de la tecnología blockchain y sistemas de criptoactivos para dinamizar la economía nacional.
Según explicó De Soto, gran parte de los peruanos en situación de pobreza habitan sobre algunos de los territorios más ricos del país; sin embargo, la falta de títulos formales impide a millones de peruanos convertir sus activos -como tierras, negocios o recursos- en capital productivo, dejándolos excluidos del sistema financiero.
“Por qué, los más pobres, la mayor parte de ellos propietarios y emprendedores, se encuentran en los territorios más ricos del Perú y no pueden capitalizarse para entrar en la revolución industrial. La respuesta es que los títulos de las propiedades, las concesiones y los contratos que los vinculan al mundo, y que deberían permitirles generar capital, tienen serias limitaciones”, sostuvo De Soto, quien brindará una charla sobre este tema en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026 que se desarrollará este sábado en Lima.
Para resolver esta problemática, el economista propone que estos recursos de poco valor sean transformados en activos altamente rentables. La estrategia consiste en que, además de ser valorizados localmente, puedan ser cotizados como capital de inversión, lo que ayudará a incluir en el sistema financiero del país a millones de personas.
Perú recibirá a expertos de tecnología blockchain y ecosistema crypto
De Soto expondrá estos planteamientos durante la charla que dará en la quinta edición del Perú Blockchain Conference, evento que se realizará el 11 de Julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar en Miraflores, que contará también con entradas gratuitas por tiempo limitado. Organizado por LATAM Blockchain Events LLC, el encuentro se consolida como el evento más importante del país en crypto, blockchain, trading, activos digitales e innovación financiera, reuniendo a líderes globales de la industria, empresas tecnológicas, instituciones, inversionistas, traders, comunidades Web3 y público interesado en las nuevas tecnologías financieras.
Durante los últimos dos años, el mercado peruano ha mostrado un crecimiento sostenido en la adopción de activos digitales y tecnología blockchain, pasando de ser un simple espectador a convertirse en protagonista, posicionándose como uno de los mercados con mayor proyección en América Latina.
Según el Informe Blockchain LATAM 2025 de Sherlock Communications, el 3.7% de peruanos ya es usuario de criptomonedas, lo que equivale a más de un millón de personas, duplicando la cantidad registrada hace menos de dos años. Asimismo, el Global Crypto Adoption Index de Chainalysis coloca al país en el puesto 7 de adopción de criptomonedas a nivel regional y en el puesto 42 a nivel mundial.
A esto se suma el crecimiento del uso de stablecoins como mecanismo de resguardo, pagos internacionales y remesas digitales, especialmente en un entorno donde la eficiencia transfronteriza y la dolarización digital ganan relevancia entre usuarios y empresas. Reportes de mercado señalan que las stablecoins representan ya una parte significativa de la actividad cripto en Perú, impulsadas por la interoperabilidad entre fintechs, wallets y el sistema financiero tradicional, logrando, incluso, que el Banco Central de Reserva de Perú destaque sus ventajas tangibles frente a los sistemas tradicionales.
“Perú vive hoy uno de los momentos más importantes para la evolución del ecosistema blockchain y de activos digitales en la región. Ya no solo somos eventos; somos un puente para acelerar la adopción cripto responsable, la educación financiera y la conexión entre empresas, instituciones y comunidad. Esta quinta edición de Perú Blockchain Conference representa la consolidación de un espacio estratégico para impulsar con profesionalismo, visión regional y compromiso el crecimiento sostenible del ecosistema Web3 en el país y en Latinoamérica”, aseguró Kristopher Panana, Fundador de Perú Blockchain Conference.
Más información y entradas:
Perú Blockchain Conference 2026
Excandidato presidencial propone que títulos de las propiedades, concesiones y contratos sean cotizados como capital de inversión y de esa manera combatir la economía informal.
De Soto expondrá sus planteamientos en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026, este 11 de julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar, junto a destacados representantes de empresas líderes del ecosistema blockchain y crypto global.
Lima, Perú — El economista y excandidato presidencial, Hernando de Soto, planteó una innovadora propuesta económica orientada a la inclusión financiera de los sectores más vulnerables del país, sugiriendo el uso de la tecnología blockchain y sistemas de criptoactivos para dinamizar la economía nacional.
Según explicó De Soto, gran parte de los peruanos en situación de pobreza habitan sobre algunos de los territorios más ricos del país; sin embargo, la falta de títulos formales impide a millones de peruanos convertir sus activos -como tierras, negocios o recursos- en capital productivo, dejándolos excluidos del sistema financiero.
“Por qué, los más pobres, la mayor parte de ellos propietarios y emprendedores, se encuentran en los territorios más ricos del Perú y no pueden capitalizarse para entrar en la revolución industrial. La respuesta es que los títulos de las propiedades, las concesiones y los contratos que los vinculan al mundo, y que deberían permitirles generar capital, tienen serias limitaciones”, sostuvo De Soto, quien brindará una charla sobre este tema en el Perú Blockchain Conference 2026 que se desarrollará este sábado en Lima.
Para resolver esta problemática, el economista propone que estos recursos de poco valor sean transformados en activos altamente rentables. La estrategia consiste en que, además de ser valorizados localmente, puedan ser cotizados como capital de inversión, lo que ayudará a incluir en el sistema financiero del país a millones de personas.
Perú recibirá a expertos de tecnología blockchain y ecosistema crypto
De Soto expondrá estos planteamientos durante la charla que dará en la quinta edición del Perú Blockchain Conference, evento que se realizará el 11 de Julio en el JW Marriott Larcomar en Miraflores, que contará también con entradas gratuitas por tiempo limitado. Organizado por LATAM Blockchain Events LLC, el encuentro se consolida como el evento más importante del país en crypto, blockchain, trading, activos digitales e innovación financiera, reuniendo a líderes globales de la industria, empresas tecnológicas, instituciones, inversionistas, traders, comunidades Web3 y público interesado en las nuevas tecnologías financieras.
Durante los últimos dos años, el mercado peruano ha mostrado un crecimiento sostenido en la adopción de activos digitales y tecnología blockchain, pasando de ser un simple espectador a convertirse en protagonista, posicionándose como uno de los mercados con mayor proyección en América Latina.
Según el Informe Blockchain LATAM 2025 de Sherlock Communications, el 3.7% de peruanos ya es usuario de criptomonedas, lo que equivale a más de un millón de personas, duplicando la cantidad registrada hace menos de dos años. Asimismo, el Global Crypto Adoption Index de Chainalysis coloca al país en el puesto 7 de adopción de criptomonedas a nivel regional y en el puesto 42 a nivel mundial.
A esto se suma el crecimiento del uso de stablecoins como mecanismo de resguardo, pagos internacionales y remesas digitales, especialmente en un entorno donde la eficiencia transfronteriza y la dolarización digital ganan relevancia entre usuarios y empresas. Reportes de mercado señalan que las stablecoins representan ya una parte significativa de la actividad cripto en Perú, impulsadas por la interoperabilidad entre fintechs, wallets y el sistema financiero tradicional, logrando, incluso, que el Banco Central de Reserva de Perú destaque sus ventajas tangibles frente a los sistemas tradicionales.
“Perú vive hoy uno de los momentos más importantes para la evolución del ecosistema blockchain y de activos digitales en la región. Ya no solo somos eventos; somos un puente para acelerar la adopción cripto responsable, la educación financiera y la conexión entre empresas, instituciones y comunidad. Esta quinta edición de Perú Blockchain Conference representa la consolidación de un espacio estratégico para impulsar con profesionalismo, visión regional y compromiso el crecimiento sostenible del ecosistema Web3 en el país y en Latinoamérica”, aseguró Kristopher Panana, Fundador de Perú Blockchain Conference.
Más información y entradas:
Perú Blockchain Conference 2026
112
Bài viết
Hội nghị Blockchain châu Âu trở lại Barcelona cho sự kiện sau MiCA đầu tiên tại châu ÂuHội nghị Blockchain châu Âu trở lại Barcelona cho sự kiện sau MiCA đầu tiên tại châu Âu
EBC12 quy tụ các diễn giả từ J.P. Morgan, Cơ quan Quản lý Hành vi Tài chính (Financial Conduct Authority), Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International và hơn 300 lãnh đạo từ các ngân hàng, cơ quan quản lý và các nhà quản lý tài sản đang định hình thị trường tài sản số của châu Âu.
Barcelona, Tây Ban Nha, tháng 7 năm 2026 — Mười một tuần sau hạn chót MiCA của Liên minh châu Âu, phiên bản thứ 12 của Hội nghị Blockchain châu Âu (EBC12) quay trở lại Barcelona vào thời điểm then chốt đối với ngành. Đây là cuộc tập hợp thể chế quy mô lớn đầu tiên của khu vực kể từ khi quy định toàn diện đầu tiên về tài sản số xuyên biên giới trên thế giới chính thức trở thành luật hoàn toàn, và cũng là sự kiện nơi dòng chảy giao dịch (deal flow) của châu Âu diễn ra.
Hội nghị Blockchain châu Âu trở lại Barcelona cho sự kiện sau MiCA đầu tiên tại châu Âu
Hội nghị Blockchain châu Âu trở lại Barcelona cho sự kiện sau MiCA đầu tiên tại châu Âu
EBC12 quy tụ các diễn giả từ J.P. Morgan, Cơ quan Quản lý Hành vi Tài chính (Financial Conduct Authority), Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International và hơn 300 lãnh đạo từ các ngân hàng, cơ quan quản lý và các nhà quản lý tài sản đang định hình thị trường tài sản số của châu Âu.
Barcelona, Tây Ban Nha, tháng 7 năm 2026 — Mười một tuần sau hạn chót MiCA của Liên minh châu Âu, phiên bản thứ 12 của Hội nghị Blockchain châu Âu (EBC12) quay trở lại Barcelona vào thời điểm then chốt đối với ngành. Đây là cuộc tập hợp thể chế quy mô lớn đầu tiên của khu vực kể từ khi quy định toàn diện đầu tiên về tài sản số xuyên biên giới trên thế giới chính thức trở thành luật hoàn toàn, và cũng là sự kiện nơi dòng chảy giao dịch (deal flow) của châu Âu diễn ra.
EBC12 quy tụ các diễn giả từ J.P. Morgan, Cơ quan Quản lý Hành vi Tài chính (Financial Conduct Authority), Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International và hơn 300 lãnh đạo từ các ngân hàng, cơ quan quản lý và các nhà quản lý tài sản đang định hình thị trường tài sản số của châu Âu.
Barcelona, Tây Ban Nha, tháng 7 năm 2026 — Mười một tuần sau hạn chót MiCA của Liên minh châu Âu, phiên bản thứ 12 của Hội nghị Blockchain châu Âu (EBC12) quay trở lại Barcelona vào thời điểm then chốt đối với ngành. Đây là cuộc tập hợp thể chế quy mô lớn đầu tiên của khu vực kể từ khi quy định toàn diện đầu tiên về tài sản số xuyên biên giới trên thế giới chính thức trở thành luật hoàn toàn, và cũng là sự kiện nơi dòng chảy giao dịch (deal flow) của châu Âu diễn ra.
COINUS-2,09%
66
Hội nghị Blockchain Châu Âu quay trở lại Barcelona cho sự kiện lớn đầu tiên ở châu Âu sau MiCAHội nghị Blockchain Châu Âu quay trở lại Barcelona cho sự kiện lớn đầu tiên ở châu Âu sau MiCA
EBC12 quy tụ các diễn giả từ J.P. Morgan, Cơ quan Quản lý Tài chính (Financial Conduct Authority), Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International và hơn 300 lãnh đạo từ các ngân hàng, cơ quan quản lý và các nhà quản lý tài sản đang định hình thị trường tài sản kỹ thuật số của châu Âu.
Barcelona, Tây Ban Nha, tháng 7 năm 2026 — Mười một tuần sau hạn chót MiCA của Liên minh châu Âu, kỳ hội lần thứ 12 của Hội nghị Blockchain Châu Âu (EBC12) trở lại Barcelona vào thời điểm then chốt đối với ngành. Đây là cuộc gặp gỡ thể chế lớn đầu tiên của khu vực kể từ khi quy định toàn diện đầu tiên trên thế giới về tài sản kỹ thuật số xuyên biên giới chính thức trở thành luật, và cũng là sự kiện nơi diễn ra dòng chảy giao dịch của các doanh nghiệp châu Âu.
Hội nghị Blockchain Châu Âu quay trở lại Barcelona cho sự kiện lớn đầu tiên ở châu Âu sau MiCA
Hội nghị Blockchain Châu Âu quay trở lại Barcelona cho sự kiện lớn đầu tiên ở châu Âu sau MiCA
EBC12 quy tụ các diễn giả từ J.P. Morgan, Cơ quan Quản lý Tài chính (Financial Conduct Authority), Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International và hơn 300 lãnh đạo từ các ngân hàng, cơ quan quản lý và các nhà quản lý tài sản đang định hình thị trường tài sản kỹ thuật số của châu Âu.
Barcelona, Tây Ban Nha, tháng 7 năm 2026 — Mười một tuần sau hạn chót MiCA của Liên minh châu Âu, kỳ hội lần thứ 12 của Hội nghị Blockchain Châu Âu (EBC12) trở lại Barcelona vào thời điểm then chốt đối với ngành. Đây là cuộc gặp gỡ thể chế lớn đầu tiên của khu vực kể từ khi quy định toàn diện đầu tiên trên thế giới về tài sản kỹ thuật số xuyên biên giới chính thức trở thành luật, và cũng là sự kiện nơi diễn ra dòng chảy giao dịch của các doanh nghiệp châu Âu.
EBC12 quy tụ các diễn giả từ J.P. Morgan, Cơ quan Quản lý Tài chính (Financial Conduct Authority), Invesco, Coinbase, Fidelity International và hơn 300 lãnh đạo từ các ngân hàng, cơ quan quản lý và các nhà quản lý tài sản đang định hình thị trường tài sản kỹ thuật số của châu Âu.
Barcelona, Tây Ban Nha, tháng 7 năm 2026 — Mười một tuần sau hạn chót MiCA của Liên minh châu Âu, kỳ hội lần thứ 12 của Hội nghị Blockchain Châu Âu (EBC12) trở lại Barcelona vào thời điểm then chốt đối với ngành. Đây là cuộc gặp gỡ thể chế lớn đầu tiên của khu vực kể từ khi quy định toàn diện đầu tiên trên thế giới về tài sản kỹ thuật số xuyên biên giới chính thức trở thành luật, và cũng là sự kiện nơi diễn ra dòng chảy giao dịch của các doanh nghiệp châu Âu.
COINUS-2,09%
80
Bài viết
Xem bản dịch
Binance CEO Richard Teng: 70% of EU Users Chose Self-Custody Over MiCA-Licensed PlatformsThe European Union’s much-anticipated Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation, designed to protect consumers through mandatory licensing and oversight, appears to be producing the opposite effect. According to disclosures by Binance co-CEO Richard Teng at the Reuters NEXT Asia summit in Singapore, the strict enforcement regime has inadvertently funneled cryptocurrency users away from regulated exchanges and toward decentralized self-custody solutions operating entirely beyond regulatory reach.
Teng revealed that among EU-based users forced to withdraw assets from Binance following the company’s June 24 withdrawal of its MiCA application, seven in ten chose to move their holdings to self-hosted wallets rather than migrate to competitors operating under MiCA authorization. Only three in ten transferred funds to licensed platforms. The finding challenges the foundational assumption underlying MiCA’s design: that regulatory pressure would consolidate activity into supervised, compliant venues.
The Data Behind the Retreat
Between June 24 and July 1, 2026, Binance processed extraordinary outflow volumes as affected European customers liquidated positions or relocated holdings elsewhere. During the week beginning June 29, the exchange recorded net outflows of approximately $1.23 billion — a 207% spike compared to the prior week’s $400 million. That volume represents not merely a reaction to a single platform’s exit, but a visible marker of where the broader user migration has gone.
Teng’s disclosure about the 70-30 split emerged as regulatory authorities including ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority) initiated formal reviews of how MiCA’s custody provisions are functioning in practice. The timing of the governance review suggests regulators themselves are questioning whether the rules have achieved their intended effect of concentrating activity within supervised frameworks.
Why Self-Custody Undermines MiCA’s Goals
Teng, a former regulator, articulated a pointed critique during his Singapore address: users holding cryptocurrency in self-hosted wallets operate beyond the anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) verification systems that MiCA mandates for licensed platforms.
“Once funds move into a self-hosted wallet, the risks actually amplify,” Teng stated. “There are no proper AML and KYC controls over those holdings.”
The irony is structural. MiCA was constructed as Europe’s first unified effort to harmonize crypto regulation across 27 member states, establishing baseline protections intended to move illicit activity into the light. Instead, the enforcement deadline appears to have accelerated migration toward the precise regulatory gray zones MiCA was designed to eliminate. Users who might have remained on licensed platforms had less friction or perceived uncertainty now actively chose unregulated self-custody.
Expert analysis from blockchain compliance firms confirms this dynamic. According to reports cited by Yahoo Finance sources, the compliance infrastructure that MiCA requires — including custody reporting, transaction monitoring, and regulatory interface — has created operational friction that makes licensed platforms less attractive than alternatives, particularly for users already skeptical of institutional intermediaries.
The Timing and Process Issues
Binance’s withdrawal from Greece was framed by Teng as forced by regulator inaction rather than a choice driven purely by business considerations. The company submitted what it claims was a fully compliant MiCA application through the Hellenic Capital Market Commission (HCMC) in January 2026. According to Teng’s account, Greek authorities conducted their review, indicated the filing met requirements, and escalated the decision to ESMA for final approval. No formal authorization was issued, but also no explanation for delay was provided.
As the July 1 deadline approached with no resolution, Binance faced a choice between operating with an incomplete license or preparing for a rushed client exit. The company chose the latter, withdrawing the application on June 24 and informing customers they had one week to move assets. Teng contended that the short transition window — itself a result of regulatory delays — created practical pressure that benefited neither users nor MiCA’s stated protective goals.
This sequence has prompted regulators to examine whether MiCA’s single-market approach is actually functioning as designed. The regulation was constructed to avoid the fragmentation that plagued pre-MiCA crypto regulation, where different member states imposed conflicting rules. Instead, early implementation suggests member-state discretion is creating the fragmentation MiCA was meant to eliminate.
Market Responses and Competitive Gains
While Binance users migrated to self-custody or licensed competitors, rival exchanges reported surging activity. OKX disclosed that app downloads spiked 158% between June 24 and July 5 in Europe — a ten-day window that captured both Binance’s exit announcement and the regulatory transition. Coinbase, Kraken, Bitpanda and other licensed platforms similarly reported elevated sign-up volumes, capturing the 30% of Binance’s departing capital that remained within regulated venues.
Yet that distribution — 70% to unregulated self-custody versus 30% to licensed competitors — means the net regulatory outcome of MiCA’s enforcement has been negative. Compliance infrastructure designed to consolidate activity into supervised markets instead fragmented it, with the majority fraction moving beyond supervision.
What Comes Next
Teng indicated that multiple EU member states have subsequently invited Binance to apply for MiCA authorization, suggesting the company’s exit is being viewed by regulators as a process failure rather than an industry problem. Binance says it remains committed to European operations and expects to secure licensing within coming months, though the company has not named candidate jurisdictions.
For ESMA and national regulators, the challenge now is determining whether the self-custody migration is temporary — a reaction to Binance’s specific exit and MiCA’s disruptive transition — or signals deeper structural problems with the regulatory approach itself. The custody review ESMA initiated this week will likely provide critical evidence about whether MiCA’s enforcement is protecting European consumers or pushing them beyond regulatory sight.
Binance CEO Richard Teng: 70% of EU Users Chose Self-Custody Over MiCA-Licensed Platforms
The European Union’s much-anticipated Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation, designed to protect consumers through mandatory licensing and oversight, appears to be producing the opposite effect. According to disclosures by Binance co-CEO Richard Teng at the Reuters NEXT Asia summit in Singapore, the strict enforcement regime has inadvertently funneled cryptocurrency users away from regulated exchanges and toward decentralized self-custody solutions operating entirely beyond regulatory reach.
Teng revealed that among EU-based users forced to withdraw assets from Binance following the company’s June 24 withdrawal of its MiCA application, seven in ten chose to move their holdings to self-hosted wallets rather than migrate to competitors operating under MiCA authorization. Only three in ten transferred funds to licensed platforms. The finding challenges the foundational assumption underlying MiCA’s design: that regulatory pressure would consolidate activity into supervised, compliant venues.
The Data Behind the Retreat
Between June 24 and July 1, 2026, Binance processed extraordinary outflow volumes as affected European customers liquidated positions or relocated holdings elsewhere. During the week beginning June 29, the exchange recorded net outflows of approximately $1.23 billion — a 207% spike compared to the prior week’s $400 million. That volume represents not merely a reaction to a single platform’s exit, but a visible marker of where the broader user migration has gone.
Teng’s disclosure about the 70-30 split emerged as regulatory authorities including ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority) initiated formal reviews of how MiCA’s custody provisions are functioning in practice. The timing of the governance review suggests regulators themselves are questioning whether the rules have achieved their intended effect of concentrating activity within supervised frameworks.
Why Self-Custody Undermines MiCA’s Goals
Teng, a former regulator, articulated a pointed critique during his Singapore address: users holding cryptocurrency in self-hosted wallets operate beyond the anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) verification systems that MiCA mandates for licensed platforms.
“Once funds move into a self-hosted wallet, the risks actually amplify,” Teng stated. “There are no proper AML and KYC controls over those holdings.”
The irony is structural. MiCA was constructed as Europe’s first unified effort to harmonize crypto regulation across 27 member states, establishing baseline protections intended to move illicit activity into the light. Instead, the enforcement deadline appears to have accelerated migration toward the precise regulatory gray zones MiCA was designed to eliminate. Users who might have remained on licensed platforms had less friction or perceived uncertainty now actively chose unregulated self-custody.
Expert analysis from blockchain compliance firms confirms this dynamic. According to reports cited by Yahoo Finance sources, the compliance infrastructure that MiCA requires — including custody reporting, transaction monitoring, and regulatory interface — has created operational friction that makes licensed platforms less attractive than alternatives, particularly for users already skeptical of institutional intermediaries.
The Timing and Process Issues
Binance’s withdrawal from Greece was framed by Teng as forced by regulator inaction rather than a choice driven purely by business considerations. The company submitted what it claims was a fully compliant MiCA application through the Hellenic Capital Market Commission (HCMC) in January 2026. According to Teng’s account, Greek authorities conducted their review, indicated the filing met requirements, and escalated the decision to ESMA for final approval. No formal authorization was issued, but also no explanation for delay was provided.
As the July 1 deadline approached with no resolution, Binance faced a choice between operating with an incomplete license or preparing for a rushed client exit. The company chose the latter, withdrawing the application on June 24 and informing customers they had one week to move assets. Teng contended that the short transition window — itself a result of regulatory delays — created practical pressure that benefited neither users nor MiCA’s stated protective goals.
This sequence has prompted regulators to examine whether MiCA’s single-market approach is actually functioning as designed. The regulation was constructed to avoid the fragmentation that plagued pre-MiCA crypto regulation, where different member states imposed conflicting rules. Instead, early implementation suggests member-state discretion is creating the fragmentation MiCA was meant to eliminate.
Market Responses and Competitive Gains
While Binance users migrated to self-custody or licensed competitors, rival exchanges reported surging activity. OKX disclosed that app downloads spiked 158% between June 24 and July 5 in Europe — a ten-day window that captured both Binance’s exit announcement and the regulatory transition. Coinbase, Kraken, Bitpanda and other licensed platforms similarly reported elevated sign-up volumes, capturing the 30% of Binance’s departing capital that remained within regulated venues.
Yet that distribution — 70% to unregulated self-custody versus 30% to licensed competitors — means the net regulatory outcome of MiCA’s enforcement has been negative. Compliance infrastructure designed to consolidate activity into supervised markets instead fragmented it, with the majority fraction moving beyond supervision.
What Comes Next
Teng indicated that multiple EU member states have subsequently invited Binance to apply for MiCA authorization, suggesting the company’s exit is being viewed by regulators as a process failure rather than an industry problem. Binance says it remains committed to European operations and expects to secure licensing within coming months, though the company has not named candidate jurisdictions.
For ESMA and national regulators, the challenge now is determining whether the self-custody migration is temporary — a reaction to Binance’s specific exit and MiCA’s disruptive transition — or signals deeper structural problems with the regulatory approach itself. The custody review ESMA initiated this week will likely provide critical evidence about whether MiCA’s enforcement is protecting European consumers or pushing them beyond regulatory sight.
Teng revealed that among EU-based users forced to withdraw assets from Binance following the company’s June 24 withdrawal of its MiCA application, seven in ten chose to move their holdings to self-hosted wallets rather than migrate to competitors operating under MiCA authorization. Only three in ten transferred funds to licensed platforms. The finding challenges the foundational assumption underlying MiCA’s design: that regulatory pressure would consolidate activity into supervised, compliant venues.
The Data Behind the Retreat
Between June 24 and July 1, 2026, Binance processed extraordinary outflow volumes as affected European customers liquidated positions or relocated holdings elsewhere. During the week beginning June 29, the exchange recorded net outflows of approximately $1.23 billion — a 207% spike compared to the prior week’s $400 million. That volume represents not merely a reaction to a single platform’s exit, but a visible marker of where the broader user migration has gone.
Teng’s disclosure about the 70-30 split emerged as regulatory authorities including ESMA (European Securities and Markets Authority) initiated formal reviews of how MiCA’s custody provisions are functioning in practice. The timing of the governance review suggests regulators themselves are questioning whether the rules have achieved their intended effect of concentrating activity within supervised frameworks.
Why Self-Custody Undermines MiCA’s Goals
Teng, a former regulator, articulated a pointed critique during his Singapore address: users holding cryptocurrency in self-hosted wallets operate beyond the anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) verification systems that MiCA mandates for licensed platforms.
“Once funds move into a self-hosted wallet, the risks actually amplify,” Teng stated. “There are no proper AML and KYC controls over those holdings.”
The irony is structural. MiCA was constructed as Europe’s first unified effort to harmonize crypto regulation across 27 member states, establishing baseline protections intended to move illicit activity into the light. Instead, the enforcement deadline appears to have accelerated migration toward the precise regulatory gray zones MiCA was designed to eliminate. Users who might have remained on licensed platforms had less friction or perceived uncertainty now actively chose unregulated self-custody.
Expert analysis from blockchain compliance firms confirms this dynamic. According to reports cited by Yahoo Finance sources, the compliance infrastructure that MiCA requires — including custody reporting, transaction monitoring, and regulatory interface — has created operational friction that makes licensed platforms less attractive than alternatives, particularly for users already skeptical of institutional intermediaries.
The Timing and Process Issues
Binance’s withdrawal from Greece was framed by Teng as forced by regulator inaction rather than a choice driven purely by business considerations. The company submitted what it claims was a fully compliant MiCA application through the Hellenic Capital Market Commission (HCMC) in January 2026. According to Teng’s account, Greek authorities conducted their review, indicated the filing met requirements, and escalated the decision to ESMA for final approval. No formal authorization was issued, but also no explanation for delay was provided.
As the July 1 deadline approached with no resolution, Binance faced a choice between operating with an incomplete license or preparing for a rushed client exit. The company chose the latter, withdrawing the application on June 24 and informing customers they had one week to move assets. Teng contended that the short transition window — itself a result of regulatory delays — created practical pressure that benefited neither users nor MiCA’s stated protective goals.
This sequence has prompted regulators to examine whether MiCA’s single-market approach is actually functioning as designed. The regulation was constructed to avoid the fragmentation that plagued pre-MiCA crypto regulation, where different member states imposed conflicting rules. Instead, early implementation suggests member-state discretion is creating the fragmentation MiCA was meant to eliminate.
Market Responses and Competitive Gains
While Binance users migrated to self-custody or licensed competitors, rival exchanges reported surging activity. OKX disclosed that app downloads spiked 158% between June 24 and July 5 in Europe — a ten-day window that captured both Binance’s exit announcement and the regulatory transition. Coinbase, Kraken, Bitpanda and other licensed platforms similarly reported elevated sign-up volumes, capturing the 30% of Binance’s departing capital that remained within regulated venues.
Yet that distribution — 70% to unregulated self-custody versus 30% to licensed competitors — means the net regulatory outcome of MiCA’s enforcement has been negative. Compliance infrastructure designed to consolidate activity into supervised markets instead fragmented it, with the majority fraction moving beyond supervision.
What Comes Next
Teng indicated that multiple EU member states have subsequently invited Binance to apply for MiCA authorization, suggesting the company’s exit is being viewed by regulators as a process failure rather than an industry problem. Binance says it remains committed to European operations and expects to secure licensing within coming months, though the company has not named candidate jurisdictions.
For ESMA and national regulators, the challenge now is determining whether the self-custody migration is temporary — a reaction to Binance’s specific exit and MiCA’s disruptive transition — or signals deeper structural problems with the regulatory approach itself. The custody review ESMA initiated this week will likely provide critical evidence about whether MiCA’s enforcement is protecting European consumers or pushing them beyond regulatory sight.
96
CEO Binance Richard Teng: 70% Người Dùng EU Chọn Tự Lưu Trữ Thay Vì Các Nền Tảng Được Cấp Phép Theo MiCAQuy định về Thị trường trong tài sản Crypto được Liên minh châu Âu kỳ vọng cao, nhằm bảo vệ người tiêu dùng thông qua cơ chế cấp phép và giám sát bắt buộc, dường như đang tạo ra hiệu ứng ngược. Theo các thông tin công bố của đồng CEO Binance là Richard Teng tại hội nghị Reuters NEXT Asia ở Singapore, chế độ thực thi nghiêm ngặt đã vô tình chuyển hướng người dùng tiền mã hóa khỏi các sàn giao dịch được quản lý và sang các giải pháp tự lưu trữ phi tập trung hoạt động hoàn toàn ngoài tầm với điều tiết.
Teng tiết lộ rằng trong số những người dùng tại EU bị buộc rút tài sản khỏi Binance sau việc công ty này rút đơn đăng ký MiCA vào ngày 24/6, bảy trên mười đã chọn chuyển số tài sản sang các ví tự quản thay vì chuyển sang các đối thủ hoạt động theo ủy quyền MiCA. Chỉ ba trên mười chuyển tiền sang các nền tảng được cấp phép. Phát hiện này thách thức giả định nền tảng đằng sau thiết kế của MiCA: rằng áp lực pháp lý sẽ gom hoạt động vào các địa điểm được giám sát và tuân thủ.
CEO Binance Richard Teng: 70% Người Dùng EU Chọn Tự Lưu Trữ Thay Vì Các Nền Tảng Được Cấp Phép Theo MiCA
Quy định về Thị trường trong tài sản Crypto được Liên minh châu Âu kỳ vọng cao, nhằm bảo vệ người tiêu dùng thông qua cơ chế cấp phép và giám sát bắt buộc, dường như đang tạo ra hiệu ứng ngược. Theo các thông tin công bố của đồng CEO Binance là Richard Teng tại hội nghị Reuters NEXT Asia ở Singapore, chế độ thực thi nghiêm ngặt đã vô tình chuyển hướng người dùng tiền mã hóa khỏi các sàn giao dịch được quản lý và sang các giải pháp tự lưu trữ phi tập trung hoạt động hoàn toàn ngoài tầm với điều tiết.
Teng tiết lộ rằng trong số những người dùng tại EU bị buộc rút tài sản khỏi Binance sau việc công ty này rút đơn đăng ký MiCA vào ngày 24/6, bảy trên mười đã chọn chuyển số tài sản sang các ví tự quản thay vì chuyển sang các đối thủ hoạt động theo ủy quyền MiCA. Chỉ ba trên mười chuyển tiền sang các nền tảng được cấp phép. Phát hiện này thách thức giả định nền tảng đằng sau thiết kế của MiCA: rằng áp lực pháp lý sẽ gom hoạt động vào các địa điểm được giám sát và tuân thủ.
Teng tiết lộ rằng trong số những người dùng tại EU bị buộc rút tài sản khỏi Binance sau việc công ty này rút đơn đăng ký MiCA vào ngày 24/6, bảy trên mười đã chọn chuyển số tài sản sang các ví tự quản thay vì chuyển sang các đối thủ hoạt động theo ủy quyền MiCA. Chỉ ba trên mười chuyển tiền sang các nền tảng được cấp phép. Phát hiện này thách thức giả định nền tảng đằng sau thiết kế của MiCA: rằng áp lực pháp lý sẽ gom hoạt động vào các địa điểm được giám sát và tuân thủ.
358
Bài viết
Alexander Gerchik: “Tôi Chưa Thấy Tín Hiệu Xấu Nào Một Cách Cơ Bản Trong Thị Trường Chứng Khoán. Nhưng Crypto thì…”Phỏng vấn hôm nay là với Alexander Gerchik, một trong những nhà giao dịch nổi tiếng nhất trong cộng đồng nói tiếng Nga. Anh đã đi từ một tài xế taxi ở New York trở thành một triệu phú, trở thành nhà giao dịch công khai đầu tiên trong thị trường nói tiếng Nga, và các cuộc phỏng vấn của anh đã nhận về hàng triệu lượt xem. Hôm nay, Gerchik công khai chia sẻ các lệnh giao dịch của mình và vận hành một kênh Telegram dành cho các nhà giao dịch.
Chúng tôi đã thảo luận về tình hình của thị trường chứng khoán Mỹ, khả năng xảy ra một đợt điều chỉnh, vai trò của tiền hưu trí và các quỹ phòng hộ, triển vọng lãi suất tại Mỹ cũng như tác động của các chính sách của Trump. Một trọng tâm riêng là thị trường crypto: chuyện gì đang xảy ra với Bitcoin, vì sao Gerchik lo ngại về chiến lược của MicroStrategy, liệu Michael Saylor có thể “chịu đựng” một đợt suy giảm hay không, và kịch bản BTC nào mà ông cho là có khả năng xảy ra hơn.
Alexander Gerchik: “Tôi Chưa Thấy Tín Hiệu Xấu Nào Một Cách Cơ Bản Trong Thị Trường Chứng Khoán. Nhưng Crypto thì…”
Phỏng vấn hôm nay là với Alexander Gerchik, một trong những nhà giao dịch nổi tiếng nhất trong cộng đồng nói tiếng Nga. Anh đã đi từ một tài xế taxi ở New York trở thành một triệu phú, trở thành nhà giao dịch công khai đầu tiên trong thị trường nói tiếng Nga, và các cuộc phỏng vấn của anh đã nhận về hàng triệu lượt xem. Hôm nay, Gerchik công khai chia sẻ các lệnh giao dịch của mình và vận hành một kênh Telegram dành cho các nhà giao dịch.
Chúng tôi đã thảo luận về tình hình của thị trường chứng khoán Mỹ, khả năng xảy ra một đợt điều chỉnh, vai trò của tiền hưu trí và các quỹ phòng hộ, triển vọng lãi suất tại Mỹ cũng như tác động của các chính sách của Trump. Một trọng tâm riêng là thị trường crypto: chuyện gì đang xảy ra với Bitcoin, vì sao Gerchik lo ngại về chiến lược của MicroStrategy, liệu Michael Saylor có thể “chịu đựng” một đợt suy giảm hay không, và kịch bản BTC nào mà ông cho là có khả năng xảy ra hơn.
Chúng tôi đã thảo luận về tình hình của thị trường chứng khoán Mỹ, khả năng xảy ra một đợt điều chỉnh, vai trò của tiền hưu trí và các quỹ phòng hộ, triển vọng lãi suất tại Mỹ cũng như tác động của các chính sách của Trump. Một trọng tâm riêng là thị trường crypto: chuyện gì đang xảy ra với Bitcoin, vì sao Gerchik lo ngại về chiến lược của MicroStrategy, liệu Michael Saylor có thể “chịu đựng” một đợt suy giảm hay không, và kịch bản BTC nào mà ông cho là có khả năng xảy ra hơn.
58
Xem bản dịch
Alexander Gerchik: “I don’t see any fundamentally bad signals in the stock market yet. But crypto...Today’s interview is with Alexander Gerchik, one of the most well-known traders in the Russian-speaking space. He went from being a taxi driver in New York to becoming a multimillionaire, became the first public trader in the Russian-speaking market, and his interviews have received millions of views. Today, Gerchik publicly shares his trades and runs a Telegram channel for traders.
We discussed the state of the U.S. stock market, a possible correction, the role of pension money and hedge funds, the outlook for U.S. interest rates, and the impact of Trump’s policies. A separate focus was the crypto market: what is happening with Bitcoin, why Gerchik is concerned about MicroStrategy’s strategy, whether Michael Saylor can “sit through” a downturn, and which BTC scenario he considers more likely.
— Alexander, hello! Let’s get straight to the main question: the S&P 500 is now at all-time highs, while many say that Americans’ purchasing power has dropped sharply. Is this a bubble? Should we expect a major correction?
The main money entering the market right now is pension money. Americans have enormous retirement savings. In America, people are taught from the very beginning: money in the bank is for current expenses, while the main money should go toward retirement.
Even a doctor who earns $20,000 a month may receive only $3,000–3,500 in retirement. And if a person is used to living on $250,000 a year, it will be difficult for them. That is why people save. But inflation is not just “sausage got more expensive.” It is the rising cost of life as a whole.
I’ll give you an example. My sister lives in Miami. She is a nurse, and her husband is also a nurse. Together, they make around $190,000 a year — that is upper middle class. They bought a house for $425,000 at a very low interest rate, around 2.25%. But the property tax went from $3,000 to $10,000 a year. The homeowners association fee went from $280 to $1,000 a month. Groceries used to cost $2,000 a month, now they cost $3,000. And salary indexation is only 3% a year. These expenses come from everywhere.
At the same time, 80% of Americans do not have $5,000 in their account. But as a nation, they have become wealthier because their retirement savings have grown significantly. Someone had $100,000–120,000, and now they have $700,000. The problem is that you cannot simply withdraw pension money — there is a penalty.
Previously, people invested their retirement money conservatively: funds, 10–12% annual returns. Nobody played around with pension money. But now people call their brokers and say: “Bro, why am I making only 10%? Look at what’s happening in the market.” That is why a lot of money came from there.
Plus, since 2010, the market has grown significantly because of buybacks. Companies were buying back their own shares. They generated huge amounts of cash, and during drawdowns, they simply entered the market and bought their own stock.
— But AI companies already seem overvalued. Micron and SanDisk have started to fall. Where can the market find new energy?
Hedge funds currently have maximum long exposure. This is public information. They have a lot of money, and a lot of money continues to flow into them. They are buying.
As for Micron, SanDisk, and others — they have grown a lot. If an instrument has gone up 1000%, someone will take profit. That is normal. It does not mean the market is immediately broken. Besides, a huge amount of money has entered the U.S. market from abroad. European markets and the Korean market are also at highs. This is all part of the broader boom.
Regarding AI, I’ll say this: I worked on artificial intelligence development for around nine years. What people now call artificial intelligence is not artificial intelligence in the full sense. It is a new-generation neural network. It is very powerful, processes data quickly, translates, builds patterns — but it still works with the information it is fed.
ChatGPT, for example, has made huge progress in a year because it was “fed.” But it is still a database and data processing. Even AI music is becoming popular now, and it can indeed be beautiful. But it still uses a human voice, a certain tone, and structure. If you listen to several songs by one AI artist, they will sound similar.
It is the same with blockchain. The technology itself is not new; it comes from the 1980s. Earlier, there simply was not enough computing power to process it properly. Now that computing power exists, the technology has become applicable.
— Could the market reverse soon? Many people already want to short Nvidia, Micron, and SK Hynix. Michael Burry is also shorting.
I have been hearing that “everything is about to end” for around 15 years. Theoretically, of course, one day there could be a drop. But you have to understand people’s psychology. If you had $100,000, then it became $400,000, and then it dropped to $320,000, many people would say: “It’s fine, I’ll sit through it.”
I have acquaintances with millions in the market. One person says: “I started with $300,000, now I have $3 million. If it becomes $2.4 million, I’ll sit through it.” People are not afraid of that.
Yes, some company valuations are insane. OpenAI spends $100 billion to try to earn $5 billion. SpaceX has an absolutely unhealthy valuation. Of course, there will be some kind of pullback. But I do not see it happening right now.
I think if a decline starts, it will not start from something general, but from some individual case. A problem has to happen in a specific stock. Because when it comes to technology, there is still no visible slowdown in growth.
The first signal is purchasing power. People are changing cars and TVs less often and postponing purchases. The second signal will be what they say at the next rate meeting.
— What do you expect on rates? Many believe Kevin Warsh will “dance to Trump’s tune.”
I do not think they will sharply cut rates. But I also think they will not be allowed to raise them. They may explain it through affordable housing. If rates go even higher, people simply will not be able to buy homes.
Mortgage rates are already around 6.25–7%. Add another 1%, and it is already 8%. I bought my first house in 2001 at an 8% mortgage rate, and that is a huge number.
There is also another potential driver — the real estate market. The government wants to give low-income people and those who previously could not afford housing access to affordable homes. They also want to limit hedge funds and large companies that buy thousands of homes. If an ordinary person can buy cheaper housing, they will have extra money that they can spend or invest.
— What about crypto? Right now everyone is buying for their balance sheets: Bitcoin, ETH, Solana. But the market is going down.
That is exactly what I do not like. Crypto is everywhere: some are buying for their balance sheets, others are buying, ETH is being bought, Solana is being bought — and the market is going down.
I am trying to understand: are large players selling because they are disappointed, or because the cost of carrying the position is too high? According to the latest data I saw, more than 70% of people who trade or hold crypto do it with leverage.
I talked about MicroStrategy several months ago. When Bitcoin started falling, I was shorting it from 85 and explained to people: the company has no operating profit, but it will have expenses. I was heavily criticized back then.
But when MicroStrategy sells even 32 BTC, the issue is not the size of the sale. For them, 32 BTC is a drop in the ocean. The point is different: a company that used to say from morning to night, “sell your kidneys, buy Bitcoin,” is now selling Bitcoin itself.
They may buy the dip later, but the problem remains. MicroStrategy will never come out and say: “Guys, we are disappointed in our strategy.”
But people do not understand the main thing: it is a public company. It is not Michael Saylor’s personal money.
If I bought Bitcoin with my own money, I can sit through even minus 90%. I believe — and I can wait. But a public company has shareholders, bonds, obligations, expenses, salaries, and insurance. Who will let them calmly sit through Bitcoin at $8,000? Technically, you can say anything, but the market can force you to sell.
The biggest mistake crypto people make is falling in love with an instrument. You cannot treat the market personally. Bitcoin can be an idea, a principle, a transformation of money — I understand that. Yes, with a seed phrase, you can cross a border, preserve capital, and feel freedom. But in real life, you still cannot buy everything everywhere with crypto. At some point, you will have to exchange USDT or BTC into regular currency, look for exchangers, banks, or people. It is still not universal and not that simple.
The biggest mistake crypto people make is falling in love with an instrument.
— For many people, Bitcoin is no longer just an instrument, but an idea: freedom, capital protection, and a way to survive crises. Fundamentally, nothing has changed, right?
I agree with that: crypto gives people a sense of freedom in many ways, and that is why it has become so popular. But right now I do not understand what should make Bitcoin grow, who should drive it, and why.
In my opinion, the first positive signal for the market could only be clear regulation, for example, the CLARITY Act. Until that happens, I do not see a strong trigger.
And the biggest problem would be if MicroStrategy starts having serious difficulties. The company is on everyone’s radar, and if that story starts falling apart, the worst thing that can happen is that people lose trust. That is the most dangerous thing for the market.
— If you had to choose between two scenarios: Bitcoin first drops to $40,000 or returns to $85,000–90,000 — which one seems more likely to you?
I think we will see Bitcoin at $40,000 sooner. I believe MicroStrategy could be the one to generate some broader problem for the market.
Interview by Alex Belov
Alexander Gerchik: “I don’t see any fundamentally bad signals in the stock market yet. But crypto...
Today’s interview is with Alexander Gerchik, one of the most well-known traders in the Russian-speaking space. He went from being a taxi driver in New York to becoming a multimillionaire, became the first public trader in the Russian-speaking market, and his interviews have received millions of views. Today, Gerchik publicly shares his trades and runs a Telegram channel for traders.
We discussed the state of the U.S. stock market, a possible correction, the role of pension money and hedge funds, the outlook for U.S. interest rates, and the impact of Trump’s policies. A separate focus was the crypto market: what is happening with Bitcoin, why Gerchik is concerned about MicroStrategy’s strategy, whether Michael Saylor can “sit through” a downturn, and which BTC scenario he considers more likely.
— Alexander, hello! Let’s get straight to the main question: the S&P 500 is now at all-time highs, while many say that Americans’ purchasing power has dropped sharply. Is this a bubble? Should we expect a major correction?
The main money entering the market right now is pension money. Americans have enormous retirement savings. In America, people are taught from the very beginning: money in the bank is for current expenses, while the main money should go toward retirement.
Even a doctor who earns $20,000 a month may receive only $3,000–3,500 in retirement. And if a person is used to living on $250,000 a year, it will be difficult for them. That is why people save. But inflation is not just “sausage got more expensive.” It is the rising cost of life as a whole.
I’ll give you an example. My sister lives in Miami. She is a nurse, and her husband is also a nurse. Together, they make around $190,000 a year — that is upper middle class. They bought a house for $425,000 at a very low interest rate, around 2.25%. But the property tax went from $3,000 to $10,000 a year. The homeowners association fee went from $280 to $1,000 a month. Groceries used to cost $2,000 a month, now they cost $3,000. And salary indexation is only 3% a year. These expenses come from everywhere.
At the same time, 80% of Americans do not have $5,000 in their account. But as a nation, they have become wealthier because their retirement savings have grown significantly. Someone had $100,000–120,000, and now they have $700,000. The problem is that you cannot simply withdraw pension money — there is a penalty.
Previously, people invested their retirement money conservatively: funds, 10–12% annual returns. Nobody played around with pension money. But now people call their brokers and say: “Bro, why am I making only 10%? Look at what’s happening in the market.” That is why a lot of money came from there.
Plus, since 2010, the market has grown significantly because of buybacks. Companies were buying back their own shares. They generated huge amounts of cash, and during drawdowns, they simply entered the market and bought their own stock.
— But AI companies already seem overvalued. Micron and SanDisk have started to fall. Where can the market find new energy?
Hedge funds currently have maximum long exposure. This is public information. They have a lot of money, and a lot of money continues to flow into them. They are buying.
As for Micron, SanDisk, and others — they have grown a lot. If an instrument has gone up 1000%, someone will take profit. That is normal. It does not mean the market is immediately broken. Besides, a huge amount of money has entered the U.S. market from abroad. European markets and the Korean market are also at highs. This is all part of the broader boom.
Regarding AI, I’ll say this: I worked on artificial intelligence development for around nine years. What people now call artificial intelligence is not artificial intelligence in the full sense. It is a new-generation neural network. It is very powerful, processes data quickly, translates, builds patterns — but it still works with the information it is fed.
ChatGPT, for example, has made huge progress in a year because it was “fed.” But it is still a database and data processing. Even AI music is becoming popular now, and it can indeed be beautiful. But it still uses a human voice, a certain tone, and structure. If you listen to several songs by one AI artist, they will sound similar.
It is the same with blockchain. The technology itself is not new; it comes from the 1980s. Earlier, there simply was not enough computing power to process it properly. Now that computing power exists, the technology has become applicable.
— Could the market reverse soon? Many people already want to short Nvidia, Micron, and SK Hynix. Michael Burry is also shorting.
I have been hearing that “everything is about to end” for around 15 years. Theoretically, of course, one day there could be a drop. But you have to understand people’s psychology. If you had $100,000, then it became $400,000, and then it dropped to $320,000, many people would say: “It’s fine, I’ll sit through it.”
I have acquaintances with millions in the market. One person says: “I started with $300,000, now I have $3 million. If it becomes $2.4 million, I’ll sit through it.” People are not afraid of that.
Yes, some company valuations are insane. OpenAI spends $100 billion to try to earn $5 billion. SpaceX has an absolutely unhealthy valuation. Of course, there will be some kind of pullback. But I do not see it happening right now.
I think if a decline starts, it will not start from something general, but from some individual case. A problem has to happen in a specific stock. Because when it comes to technology, there is still no visible slowdown in growth.
The first signal is purchasing power. People are changing cars and TVs less often and postponing purchases. The second signal will be what they say at the next rate meeting.
— What do you expect on rates? Many believe Kevin Warsh will “dance to Trump’s tune.”
I do not think they will sharply cut rates. But I also think they will not be allowed to raise them. They may explain it through affordable housing. If rates go even higher, people simply will not be able to buy homes.
Mortgage rates are already around 6.25–7%. Add another 1%, and it is already 8%. I bought my first house in 2001 at an 8% mortgage rate, and that is a huge number.
There is also another potential driver — the real estate market. The government wants to give low-income people and those who previously could not afford housing access to affordable homes. They also want to limit hedge funds and large companies that buy thousands of homes. If an ordinary person can buy cheaper housing, they will have extra money that they can spend or invest.
— What about crypto? Right now everyone is buying for their balance sheets: Bitcoin, ETH, Solana. But the market is going down.
That is exactly what I do not like. Crypto is everywhere: some are buying for their balance sheets, others are buying, ETH is being bought, Solana is being bought — and the market is going down.
I am trying to understand: are large players selling because they are disappointed, or because the cost of carrying the position is too high? According to the latest data I saw, more than 70% of people who trade or hold crypto do it with leverage.
I talked about MicroStrategy several months ago. When Bitcoin started falling, I was shorting it from 85 and explained to people: the company has no operating profit, but it will have expenses. I was heavily criticized back then.
But when MicroStrategy sells even 32 BTC, the issue is not the size of the sale. For them, 32 BTC is a drop in the ocean. The point is different: a company that used to say from morning to night, “sell your kidneys, buy Bitcoin,” is now selling Bitcoin itself.
They may buy the dip later, but the problem remains. MicroStrategy will never come out and say: “Guys, we are disappointed in our strategy.”
But people do not understand the main thing: it is a public company. It is not Michael Saylor’s personal money.
If I bought Bitcoin with my own money, I can sit through even minus 90%. I believe — and I can wait. But a public company has shareholders, bonds, obligations, expenses, salaries, and insurance. Who will let them calmly sit through Bitcoin at $8,000? Technically, you can say anything, but the market can force you to sell.
The biggest mistake crypto people make is falling in love with an instrument. You cannot treat the market personally. Bitcoin can be an idea, a principle, a transformation of money — I understand that. Yes, with a seed phrase, you can cross a border, preserve capital, and feel freedom. But in real life, you still cannot buy everything everywhere with crypto. At some point, you will have to exchange USDT or BTC into regular currency, look for exchangers, banks, or people. It is still not universal and not that simple.
The biggest mistake crypto people make is falling in love with an instrument.
— For many people, Bitcoin is no longer just an instrument, but an idea: freedom, capital protection, and a way to survive crises. Fundamentally, nothing has changed, right?
I agree with that: crypto gives people a sense of freedom in many ways, and that is why it has become so popular. But right now I do not understand what should make Bitcoin grow, who should drive it, and why.
In my opinion, the first positive signal for the market could only be clear regulation, for example, the CLARITY Act. Until that happens, I do not see a strong trigger.
And the biggest problem would be if MicroStrategy starts having serious difficulties. The company is on everyone’s radar, and if that story starts falling apart, the worst thing that can happen is that people lose trust. That is the most dangerous thing for the market.
— If you had to choose between two scenarios: Bitcoin first drops to $40,000 or returns to $85,000–90,000 — which one seems more likely to you?
I think we will see Bitcoin at $40,000 sooner. I believe MicroStrategy could be the one to generate some broader problem for the market.
Interview by Alex Belov
We discussed the state of the U.S. stock market, a possible correction, the role of pension money and hedge funds, the outlook for U.S. interest rates, and the impact of Trump’s policies. A separate focus was the crypto market: what is happening with Bitcoin, why Gerchik is concerned about MicroStrategy’s strategy, whether Michael Saylor can “sit through” a downturn, and which BTC scenario he considers more likely.
— Alexander, hello! Let’s get straight to the main question: the S&P 500 is now at all-time highs, while many say that Americans’ purchasing power has dropped sharply. Is this a bubble? Should we expect a major correction?
The main money entering the market right now is pension money. Americans have enormous retirement savings. In America, people are taught from the very beginning: money in the bank is for current expenses, while the main money should go toward retirement.
Even a doctor who earns $20,000 a month may receive only $3,000–3,500 in retirement. And if a person is used to living on $250,000 a year, it will be difficult for them. That is why people save. But inflation is not just “sausage got more expensive.” It is the rising cost of life as a whole.
I’ll give you an example. My sister lives in Miami. She is a nurse, and her husband is also a nurse. Together, they make around $190,000 a year — that is upper middle class. They bought a house for $425,000 at a very low interest rate, around 2.25%. But the property tax went from $3,000 to $10,000 a year. The homeowners association fee went from $280 to $1,000 a month. Groceries used to cost $2,000 a month, now they cost $3,000. And salary indexation is only 3% a year. These expenses come from everywhere.
At the same time, 80% of Americans do not have $5,000 in their account. But as a nation, they have become wealthier because their retirement savings have grown significantly. Someone had $100,000–120,000, and now they have $700,000. The problem is that you cannot simply withdraw pension money — there is a penalty.
Previously, people invested their retirement money conservatively: funds, 10–12% annual returns. Nobody played around with pension money. But now people call their brokers and say: “Bro, why am I making only 10%? Look at what’s happening in the market.” That is why a lot of money came from there.
Plus, since 2010, the market has grown significantly because of buybacks. Companies were buying back their own shares. They generated huge amounts of cash, and during drawdowns, they simply entered the market and bought their own stock.
— But AI companies already seem overvalued. Micron and SanDisk have started to fall. Where can the market find new energy?
Hedge funds currently have maximum long exposure. This is public information. They have a lot of money, and a lot of money continues to flow into them. They are buying.
As for Micron, SanDisk, and others — they have grown a lot. If an instrument has gone up 1000%, someone will take profit. That is normal. It does not mean the market is immediately broken. Besides, a huge amount of money has entered the U.S. market from abroad. European markets and the Korean market are also at highs. This is all part of the broader boom.
Regarding AI, I’ll say this: I worked on artificial intelligence development for around nine years. What people now call artificial intelligence is not artificial intelligence in the full sense. It is a new-generation neural network. It is very powerful, processes data quickly, translates, builds patterns — but it still works with the information it is fed.
ChatGPT, for example, has made huge progress in a year because it was “fed.” But it is still a database and data processing. Even AI music is becoming popular now, and it can indeed be beautiful. But it still uses a human voice, a certain tone, and structure. If you listen to several songs by one AI artist, they will sound similar.
It is the same with blockchain. The technology itself is not new; it comes from the 1980s. Earlier, there simply was not enough computing power to process it properly. Now that computing power exists, the technology has become applicable.
— Could the market reverse soon? Many people already want to short Nvidia, Micron, and SK Hynix. Michael Burry is also shorting.
I have been hearing that “everything is about to end” for around 15 years. Theoretically, of course, one day there could be a drop. But you have to understand people’s psychology. If you had $100,000, then it became $400,000, and then it dropped to $320,000, many people would say: “It’s fine, I’ll sit through it.”
I have acquaintances with millions in the market. One person says: “I started with $300,000, now I have $3 million. If it becomes $2.4 million, I’ll sit through it.” People are not afraid of that.
Yes, some company valuations are insane. OpenAI spends $100 billion to try to earn $5 billion. SpaceX has an absolutely unhealthy valuation. Of course, there will be some kind of pullback. But I do not see it happening right now.
I think if a decline starts, it will not start from something general, but from some individual case. A problem has to happen in a specific stock. Because when it comes to technology, there is still no visible slowdown in growth.
The first signal is purchasing power. People are changing cars and TVs less often and postponing purchases. The second signal will be what they say at the next rate meeting.
— What do you expect on rates? Many believe Kevin Warsh will “dance to Trump’s tune.”
I do not think they will sharply cut rates. But I also think they will not be allowed to raise them. They may explain it through affordable housing. If rates go even higher, people simply will not be able to buy homes.
Mortgage rates are already around 6.25–7%. Add another 1%, and it is already 8%. I bought my first house in 2001 at an 8% mortgage rate, and that is a huge number.
There is also another potential driver — the real estate market. The government wants to give low-income people and those who previously could not afford housing access to affordable homes. They also want to limit hedge funds and large companies that buy thousands of homes. If an ordinary person can buy cheaper housing, they will have extra money that they can spend or invest.
— What about crypto? Right now everyone is buying for their balance sheets: Bitcoin, ETH, Solana. But the market is going down.
That is exactly what I do not like. Crypto is everywhere: some are buying for their balance sheets, others are buying, ETH is being bought, Solana is being bought — and the market is going down.
I am trying to understand: are large players selling because they are disappointed, or because the cost of carrying the position is too high? According to the latest data I saw, more than 70% of people who trade or hold crypto do it with leverage.
I talked about MicroStrategy several months ago. When Bitcoin started falling, I was shorting it from 85 and explained to people: the company has no operating profit, but it will have expenses. I was heavily criticized back then.
But when MicroStrategy sells even 32 BTC, the issue is not the size of the sale. For them, 32 BTC is a drop in the ocean. The point is different: a company that used to say from morning to night, “sell your kidneys, buy Bitcoin,” is now selling Bitcoin itself.
They may buy the dip later, but the problem remains. MicroStrategy will never come out and say: “Guys, we are disappointed in our strategy.”
But people do not understand the main thing: it is a public company. It is not Michael Saylor’s personal money.
If I bought Bitcoin with my own money, I can sit through even minus 90%. I believe — and I can wait. But a public company has shareholders, bonds, obligations, expenses, salaries, and insurance. Who will let them calmly sit through Bitcoin at $8,000? Technically, you can say anything, but the market can force you to sell.
The biggest mistake crypto people make is falling in love with an instrument. You cannot treat the market personally. Bitcoin can be an idea, a principle, a transformation of money — I understand that. Yes, with a seed phrase, you can cross a border, preserve capital, and feel freedom. But in real life, you still cannot buy everything everywhere with crypto. At some point, you will have to exchange USDT or BTC into regular currency, look for exchangers, banks, or people. It is still not universal and not that simple.
The biggest mistake crypto people make is falling in love with an instrument.
— For many people, Bitcoin is no longer just an instrument, but an idea: freedom, capital protection, and a way to survive crises. Fundamentally, nothing has changed, right?
I agree with that: crypto gives people a sense of freedom in many ways, and that is why it has become so popular. But right now I do not understand what should make Bitcoin grow, who should drive it, and why.
In my opinion, the first positive signal for the market could only be clear regulation, for example, the CLARITY Act. Until that happens, I do not see a strong trigger.
And the biggest problem would be if MicroStrategy starts having serious difficulties. The company is on everyone’s radar, and if that story starts falling apart, the worst thing that can happen is that people lose trust. That is the most dangerous thing for the market.
— If you had to choose between two scenarios: Bitcoin first drops to $40,000 or returns to $85,000–90,000 — which one seems more likely to you?
I think we will see Bitcoin at $40,000 sooner. I believe MicroStrategy could be the one to generate some broader problem for the market.
Interview by Alex Belov
133
PROFX MEDIA THÔNG BÁO PROFX EXPO CHÂU PHI 2026 TẠI THÀNH PHỐ HỒI NAM, KẾT NỐI CÁC NHÀ LÃNH ĐẠO TOÀN CẦU VỀ FOREX & FINTECHPROFX MEDIA THÔNG BÁO PROFX EXPO CHÂU PHI 2026 TẠI THÀNH PHỐ HỒI NAM, KẾT NỐI CÁC NHÀ LÃNH ĐẠO TOÀN CẦU VỀ FOREX & FINTECH
Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Nam Phi – 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026
ProFX Media hân hạnh thông báo sự kiện sắp diễn ra PROFX Expo Châu Phi 2026, một triển lãm quốc tế về ngành tài chính dự kiến diễn ra vào ngày 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026 tại Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Nam Phi.
Sự kiện sẽ quy tụ các chuyên gia hàng đầu, các tổ chức và nhà ra quyết định từ toàn cầu trong hệ sinh thái tài chính, bao gồm các sàn giao dịch Forex, các công ty FinTech, nhà cung cấp thanh khoản, doanh nghiệp giải pháp thanh toán, những nhà đổi mới blockchain và các nhà đầu tư tổ chức.
PROFX MEDIA THÔNG BÁO PROFX EXPO CHÂU PHI 2026 TẠI THÀNH PHỐ HỒI NAM, KẾT NỐI CÁC NHÀ LÃNH ĐẠO TOÀN CẦU VỀ FOREX & FINTECH
PROFX MEDIA THÔNG BÁO PROFX EXPO CHÂU PHI 2026 TẠI THÀNH PHỐ HỒI NAM, KẾT NỐI CÁC NHÀ LÃNH ĐẠO TOÀN CẦU VỀ FOREX & FINTECH
Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Nam Phi – 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026
ProFX Media hân hạnh thông báo sự kiện sắp diễn ra PROFX Expo Châu Phi 2026, một triển lãm quốc tế về ngành tài chính dự kiến diễn ra vào ngày 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026 tại Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Nam Phi.
Sự kiện sẽ quy tụ các chuyên gia hàng đầu, các tổ chức và nhà ra quyết định từ toàn cầu trong hệ sinh thái tài chính, bao gồm các sàn giao dịch Forex, các công ty FinTech, nhà cung cấp thanh khoản, doanh nghiệp giải pháp thanh toán, những nhà đổi mới blockchain và các nhà đầu tư tổ chức.
Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Nam Phi – 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026
ProFX Media hân hạnh thông báo sự kiện sắp diễn ra PROFX Expo Châu Phi 2026, một triển lãm quốc tế về ngành tài chính dự kiến diễn ra vào ngày 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026 tại Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Nam Phi.
Sự kiện sẽ quy tụ các chuyên gia hàng đầu, các tổ chức và nhà ra quyết định từ toàn cầu trong hệ sinh thái tài chính, bao gồm các sàn giao dịch Forex, các công ty FinTech, nhà cung cấp thanh khoản, doanh nghiệp giải pháp thanh toán, những nhà đổi mới blockchain và các nhà đầu tư tổ chức.
74
Bài viết
PROFX MEDIA THÔNG BÁO PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 TẠI CAPE TOWN, THỐNG NHẤT CÁC LÃNH ĐẠO FOREX & FINTECH TOÀN CẦUPROFX MEDIA THÔNG BÁO PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 TẠI THÀNH PHỐ HỒI ĐẾN, THỐNG NHẤT CÁC LÃNH ĐẠO FOREX & FINTECH TOÀN CẦU
Cape Town, Nam Phi – 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026
ProFX Media hân hạnh thông báo triển lãm sắp diễn ra PROFX Expo Africa 2026, một sự kiện triển lãm ngành tài chính quốc tế dự kiến diễn ra vào ngày 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026 tại Cape Town, Nam Phi.
Sự kiện sẽ quy tụ các chuyên gia hàng đầu, các tổ chức và nhà hoạch định quyết định từ toàn bộ hệ sinh thái tài chính toàn cầu, bao gồm các nhà môi giới Forex, các công ty FinTech, các nhà cung cấp thanh khoản, các doanh nghiệp giải pháp thanh toán, các nhà đổi mới blockchain và các nhà đầu tư tổ chức.
PROFX MEDIA THÔNG BÁO PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 TẠI CAPE TOWN, THỐNG NHẤT CÁC LÃNH ĐẠO FOREX & FINTECH TOÀN CẦU
PROFX MEDIA THÔNG BÁO PROFX EXPO AFRICA 2026 TẠI THÀNH PHỐ HỒI ĐẾN, THỐNG NHẤT CÁC LÃNH ĐẠO FOREX & FINTECH TOÀN CẦU
Cape Town, Nam Phi – 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026
ProFX Media hân hạnh thông báo triển lãm sắp diễn ra PROFX Expo Africa 2026, một sự kiện triển lãm ngành tài chính quốc tế dự kiến diễn ra vào ngày 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026 tại Cape Town, Nam Phi.
Sự kiện sẽ quy tụ các chuyên gia hàng đầu, các tổ chức và nhà hoạch định quyết định từ toàn bộ hệ sinh thái tài chính toàn cầu, bao gồm các nhà môi giới Forex, các công ty FinTech, các nhà cung cấp thanh khoản, các doanh nghiệp giải pháp thanh toán, các nhà đổi mới blockchain và các nhà đầu tư tổ chức.
Cape Town, Nam Phi – 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026
ProFX Media hân hạnh thông báo triển lãm sắp diễn ra PROFX Expo Africa 2026, một sự kiện triển lãm ngành tài chính quốc tế dự kiến diễn ra vào ngày 20–21 tháng 8 năm 2026 tại Cape Town, Nam Phi.
Sự kiện sẽ quy tụ các chuyên gia hàng đầu, các tổ chức và nhà hoạch định quyết định từ toàn bộ hệ sinh thái tài chính toàn cầu, bao gồm các nhà môi giới Forex, các công ty FinTech, các nhà cung cấp thanh khoản, các doanh nghiệp giải pháp thanh toán, các nhà đổi mới blockchain và các nhà đầu tư tổ chức.
110
Đăng nhập để khám phá thêm nội dung
Tham gia cùng người dùng tiền mã hóa toàn cầu trên Binance Square
⚡️ Nhận thông tin mới nhất và hữu ích về tiền mã hóa.
💬 Được tin cậy bởi sàn giao dịch tiền mã hóa lớn nhất thế giới.
👍 Khám phá những thông tin chuyên sâu thực tế từ những nhà sáng tạo đã xác minh.
Email / Số điện thoại
Chủ đề thịnh hành
45NgayTuDoTaiChinh
702,966 lượt xem
1,798 đang thảo luận
#45NgayTuDoTaiChinh
45 Ngày Tới Tự Do Tài Chính? Mọi Thứ Bắt Đầu Từ Một Quyết Định.
Bạn có thể thay đổi hoàn toàn cuộc sống của mình chỉ trong 45 ngày không?
Có thể là không.
Nhưng tư duy, thói quen và định hướng tài chính của bạn chắc chắn có thể.
Phần lớn mọi người mất nhiều năm chờ đợi “cơ hội hoàn hảo” trong khi không làm gì cả. Ngược lại, các nhà đầu tư thành công tập trung vào việc học hỏi, hành động và cải thiện mỗi ngày.
Hãy tưởng tượng bạn dành 45 ngày tới để:
Mỗi ngày học một điều mới về crypto.
Quản lý rủi ro thay vì đuổi theo lợi nhuận ngắn hạn.
Xây dựng danh mục dài hạn thay vì đánh cược.
Ghi lại các chiến thắng, thất bại và bài học của bạn.
Giữ kỷ luật, ngay cả khi thị trường biến động cảm xúc.
Tự do tài chính không được tạo ra bằng việc tìm một token 100x duy nhất. Nó được xây dựng từ những thói quen đều đặn, việc học liên tục và những quyết định thông minh.
Dù bạn bắt đầu với 100 USD hay 10.000 USD, điều quan trọng nhất là có một kế hoạch và bám sát kế hoạch đó.
Hôm nay có thể là Ngày 1 của thử thách 45 ngày này.
45 ngày nữa bạn có còn ở vị trí như cũ hay bạn sẽ trở thành một nhà đầu tư tốt hơn?
Tôi tham gia. Bạn thì sao?
Tuyên bố miễn trừ trách nhiệm: Bài viết này thể hiện quan điểm cá nhân của tôi và chỉ nhằm mục đích giáo dục. Đây không phải là lời khuyên tài chính. Hãy luôn tự nghiên cứu (DYOR) và đầu tư một cách có trách nhiệm. Các khoản đầu tư crypto có rủi ro đáng kể.
Phoenix6868-Crypto Follower
·1 lượt thích
·31 lượt xem
MissilesHitJaskPowerAndDesalinationFacilities
0 lượt xem
9 đang thảo luận
MetaInTalksToLeaseComputeToAnthropic
870 lượt xem
60 đang thảo luận