Binance Square
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker

blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker

ZoyaQueen16
·
--
O‘suvchi
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker 🚨 Blockstream qat’iy turibdi: Liquid Network hujumchilariga to‘lov (ransom) yo‘q Blockstream yaqinda Liquid Network’dagi kiritilgan ekspluatatsiya natijasida olingan qolgan ~600 BTC uchun to‘lov to‘lashdan bosh tortib, keskin pozitsiya bildirdi. 📰 Asosiy yangiliklar • Hujumchilar dastlab ~4,000 BTC ni (taxminan $320 mln) bo‘shatib olishgan va mablag‘larni qaytarish uchun 10% mukofot talab qilishgan. • Oxir-oqibat ~3,400 BTC qaytarilgan bo‘lsa-da, Blockstream rasmiy ravishda mukofot talabini rad etdi va qolgan aktivlarni ushlab turgan ishtirokchilar bilan muzokara qilmasligini tasdiqladi. 📉 Bozor ta’siri • Ijobiy misol Bu kripto shantajiga nisbatan muhim “nolga teng bardoshlilik” pozitsiyasini kuchaytiradi va kelajakdagi “white-hat” (o‘zini himoyachi deb ko‘rsatadigan) to‘lov talablarini tiyib turadi. • Xavfsizlikka e’tibor Hodisa vaqtincha hamjamiyat va tartibga soluvchi organlarning sidechain (zanjir yonidagi) xavfsizligi, dasturiy xatolar hamda ko‘p imzoli federatsiya modellariga qiziqishini kuchaytirishi mumkin. 👇 Muhokamaga qo‘shiling Sizningcha, to‘lovni rad etish uzoq muddatli ekotizim xavfsizligi uchun to‘g‘ri qadammi, yoki foydalanuvchi mablag‘larini qaytarish borasida xavfli pretsedent o‘rnatadimi? Quyida muhokama qilaylik! 💬 #Bitcoin #LiquidNetwork #CryptoSecurity #Blockstream #CryptoNews Bu faqat ta’lim maqsadlari uchun. Moliyaviy maslahat emas (NFA). Har doim o‘zingizning tadqiqotingizni qiling (DYOR). $SAGA $LSK $FF {future}(FFUSDT) {future}(LSKUSDT) {future}(SAGAUSDT)
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker 🚨 Blockstream qat’iy turibdi: Liquid Network hujumchilariga to‘lov (ransom) yo‘q

Blockstream yaqinda Liquid Network’dagi kiritilgan ekspluatatsiya natijasida olingan qolgan ~600 BTC uchun to‘lov to‘lashdan bosh tortib, keskin pozitsiya bildirdi.

📰 Asosiy yangiliklar
• Hujumchilar dastlab ~4,000 BTC ni (taxminan $320 mln) bo‘shatib olishgan va mablag‘larni qaytarish uchun 10% mukofot talab qilishgan.
• Oxir-oqibat ~3,400 BTC qaytarilgan bo‘lsa-da, Blockstream rasmiy ravishda mukofot talabini rad etdi va qolgan aktivlarni ushlab turgan ishtirokchilar bilan muzokara qilmasligini tasdiqladi.

📉 Bozor ta’siri
• Ijobiy misol Bu kripto shantajiga nisbatan muhim “nolga teng bardoshlilik” pozitsiyasini kuchaytiradi va kelajakdagi “white-hat” (o‘zini himoyachi deb ko‘rsatadigan) to‘lov talablarini tiyib turadi.
• Xavfsizlikka e’tibor Hodisa vaqtincha hamjamiyat va tartibga soluvchi organlarning sidechain (zanjir yonidagi) xavfsizligi, dasturiy xatolar hamda ko‘p imzoli federatsiya modellariga qiziqishini kuchaytirishi mumkin.

👇 Muhokamaga qo‘shiling
Sizningcha, to‘lovni rad etish uzoq muddatli ekotizim xavfsizligi uchun to‘g‘ri qadammi, yoki foydalanuvchi mablag‘larini qaytarish borasida xavfli pretsedent o‘rnatadimi? Quyida muhokama qilaylik! 💬

#Bitcoin #LiquidNetwork #CryptoSecurity #Blockstream #CryptoNews

Bu faqat ta’lim maqsadlari uchun. Moliyaviy maslahat emas (NFA). Har doim o‘zingizning tadqiqotingizni qiling (DYOR).
$SAGA $LSK $FF
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker 🚨 Blockstream’ning pozitsiyasi: Liquid Network hujumchilariga to‘lov yo‘q Blockstream qat’iy yo‘l tutadi: u so‘nggi Liquid Network tarmog‘i ekspluatatsiyasida o‘g‘irlangan ~600 BTC qolgan qismi uchun to‘lov (fidya) to‘lashdan bosh tortadi. 📰 Asosiy yangiliklar • Hujumchilar avvaliga taxminan ~4,000 BTC (taxminan 320 million dollar)ni yechib olishgan va pullarni qaytarish uchun 10% miqdorida mukofot so‘ragan. • Oxir-oqibat ~3,400 BTC qaytarilgan bo‘lsa-da, Blockstream rasmiy ravishda mukofot so‘rovini rad etdi va qolgan aktivlarni hali ham ushlab turgan tomonlar bilan muzokara qilmasligini tasdiqladi. 📉 Bozor ta’siri • Ijobiy pretsedent kriptovalyuta sohasida shantajga nisbatan mutlaq toqat qilmaslik haqidagi aniq pozitsiyani mustahkamlaydi va kelajakdagi “yashirin yovuzlar” tipidagi fidya talablarini to‘xtatadi. • Xavfsizlik bo‘yicha tekshiruv hodisa hamjamiyat hamda tartibga soluvchi organlar tomonidan yon zanjirlar (sidechain) xavfsizligi, dasturiy xatolar va multi-signature (ko‘p imzoli) ittifoq modellariga bo‘lgan qiziqishni vaqtincha oshirishiga olib kelishi mumkin. 👇 Muhokamaga qo‘shiling Sizningcha, fidyani rad etish tizim ekotizimi uzoq muddatli xavfsizligi uchun to‘g‘ri qadammi, yoki bu foydalanuvchilar pullarini qaytarib olish borasida xavfli pretsedent o‘rnatadimi? Quyida muhokama qilaylik! 💬 #Bitcoin #LiquidNetwork #CryptoSecurity #CryptoNews Faqat o‘qitish maqsadida. Bu moliyaviy maslahat emas (NFA). Har doim o‘zingizning shaxsiy izlanishingizni qiling (DYOR). Davomini iltimos $SAGA $LSK $FF
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker 🚨 Blockstream’ning pozitsiyasi: Liquid Network hujumchilariga to‘lov yo‘q
Blockstream qat’iy yo‘l tutadi: u so‘nggi Liquid Network tarmog‘i ekspluatatsiyasida o‘g‘irlangan ~600 BTC qolgan qismi uchun to‘lov (fidya) to‘lashdan bosh tortadi.
📰 Asosiy yangiliklar
• Hujumchilar avvaliga taxminan ~4,000 BTC (taxminan 320 million dollar)ni yechib olishgan va pullarni qaytarish uchun 10% miqdorida mukofot so‘ragan.
• Oxir-oqibat ~3,400 BTC qaytarilgan bo‘lsa-da, Blockstream rasmiy ravishda mukofot so‘rovini rad etdi va qolgan aktivlarni hali ham ushlab turgan tomonlar bilan muzokara qilmasligini tasdiqladi.
📉 Bozor ta’siri
• Ijobiy pretsedent kriptovalyuta sohasida shantajga nisbatan mutlaq toqat qilmaslik haqidagi aniq pozitsiyani mustahkamlaydi va kelajakdagi “yashirin yovuzlar” tipidagi fidya talablarini to‘xtatadi.
• Xavfsizlik bo‘yicha tekshiruv hodisa hamjamiyat hamda tartibga soluvchi organlar tomonidan yon zanjirlar (sidechain) xavfsizligi, dasturiy xatolar va multi-signature (ko‘p imzoli) ittifoq modellariga bo‘lgan qiziqishni vaqtincha oshirishiga olib kelishi mumkin.
👇 Muhokamaga qo‘shiling
Sizningcha, fidyani rad etish tizim ekotizimi uzoq muddatli xavfsizligi uchun to‘g‘ri qadammi, yoki bu foydalanuvchilar pullarini qaytarib olish borasida xavfli pretsedent o‘rnatadimi? Quyida muhokama qilaylik! 💬
#Bitcoin #LiquidNetwork #CryptoSecurity #CryptoNews
Faqat o‘qitish maqsadida. Bu moliyaviy maslahat emas (NFA). Har doim o‘zingizning shaxsiy izlanishingizni qiling (DYOR).

Davomini iltimos

$SAGA $LSK $FF
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker ​🛑 Qaroqchilar bilan muomala qilmang! 🛑 ​Blockstream hazil qilmaydi. Liquid Network tarmog‘i yirik miqyosda ekspluatatsiya qilingandan keyin (~4,000 $BTC olib ketilgan), hujumchilar 3,400 BTC bilan qaytishdi, lekin qolgan qismini garovda ushlab qolishga harakat qilishdi: “mukofot” sifatida 10% (taxminan 598 BTC) talab qilishdi. ​Blockstream javob berdimi? Yo‘q, kesmaydi. 🚫 ​Ular rasmiy ravishda bu aniq talonchilik ekanini aytishadi va qaroqchilarning “white hat” (oq shlyapa) degan bahonasini mutlaqo rad etishadi. To‘lovni to‘lash o‘rniga, Blockstream kattalarni chaqiradi — huquqni muhofaza qiluvchi idoralar va kriminelistlar bilan hamkorlikda har bir tangani oxirigacha kuzatib borish uchun. ​Soha uchun ulkan bayonot: kriptovalyuta jinoyatlariga nisbatan hech qanday bag‘rikenglik yo‘q! 🚔🔒 Davom eting, iltimos ​ #CPIWatch #USToSanctionBigBankMonday #Blockstream $MARSCOIN $MET
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker
​🛑 Qaroqchilar bilan muomala qilmang! 🛑
​Blockstream hazil qilmaydi. Liquid Network tarmog‘i yirik miqyosda ekspluatatsiya qilingandan keyin (~4,000 $BTC olib ketilgan), hujumchilar 3,400 BTC bilan qaytishdi, lekin qolgan qismini garovda ushlab qolishga harakat qilishdi: “mukofot” sifatida 10% (taxminan 598 BTC) talab qilishdi.
​Blockstream javob berdimi? Yo‘q, kesmaydi. 🚫
​Ular rasmiy ravishda bu aniq talonchilik ekanini aytishadi va qaroqchilarning “white hat” (oq shlyapa) degan bahonasini mutlaqo rad etishadi. To‘lovni to‘lash o‘rniga, Blockstream kattalarni chaqiradi — huquqni muhofaza qiluvchi idoralar va kriminelistlar bilan hamkorlikda har bir tangani oxirigacha kuzatib borish uchun.
​Soha uchun ulkan bayonot: kriptovalyuta jinoyatlariga nisbatan hech qanday bag‘rikenglik yo‘q! 🚔🔒

Davom eting, iltimos

#CPIWatch #USToSanctionBigBankMonday #Blockstream
$MARSCOIN $MET
See translation
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker ​🛑 No Deals With Hackers! 🛑 ​Blockstream isn't playing games. Following the massive Liquid Network exploit (~4,000 $BTC taken), the attackers returned 3,400 BTC but tried to hold the rest hostage, demanding a 10% "bounty" (about 598 BTC). ​Blockstream's response? A hard NO. 🚫 ​They are officially calling this out as straight-up theft, completely rejecting the hackers' "white-hat" excuse. Instead of paying the ransom, Blockstream is bringing in the big guns—partnering with law enforcement and forensic experts to hunt down every last coin. ​A massive statement for the space: zero tolerance for crypto crime! 🚔🔒 ​ #CPIWatch #USToSanctionBigBankMonday #Blockstream $MARSCOIN $MET {future}(MARSCOINUSDT) {future}(BTCUSDT) {future}(METUSDT)
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker
​🛑 No Deals With Hackers! 🛑

​Blockstream isn't playing games. Following the massive Liquid Network exploit (~4,000 $BTC taken), the attackers returned 3,400 BTC but tried to hold the rest hostage, demanding a 10% "bounty" (about 598 BTC).

​Blockstream's response? A hard NO. 🚫

​They are officially calling this out as straight-up theft, completely rejecting the hackers' "white-hat" excuse. Instead of paying the ransom, Blockstream is bringing in the big guns—partnering with law enforcement and forensic experts to hunt down every last coin.

​A massive statement for the space: zero tolerance for crypto crime! 🚔🔒

#CPIWatch #USToSanctionBigBankMonday #Blockstream
$MARSCOIN $MET
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker 🚨 BLOCKSTREAM GAROVGA TO‘LAMAYDI: LIQUID’DAGI HUJUMCHI 47 MLN $LIK TUTILISHGA DUCH KELMOQDA 🚨   O‘g‘irlangan tangalar garovga aylansa, ishonch real jang maydoniga aylanadi. Bu safar esa hujumchi jimlik narxini belgilamoqchi.   Blockstream Liquid Network’ning 320 mln dollarlik ekspluatatsiyasi ortidagi hujumchi talab qilgan to‘lovni to‘lashdan bosh tortdi. Ular ruxsatsiz qo‘lga kiritish va mablag‘larni ushlab qolishni qonuniy “white-hat” faoliyati emas, balki o‘g‘rilik deb atashdi.   Dastlabki ekspluatatsiya, zaiflik tufayli taqdim etilmagan (unbacked) L-BTC yaratilishi va uning real BTC ga aylantirilishiga imkon berganidan so‘ng, Liquid federatsiyasi hamyonidan qariyb 4,000 BTC ni oqizib yuborgan. Federatsiyaning kriptografik kalitlari buzib kirilgan deb xabar berilmagan.   Keyinchalik Blockstream ta’sirlangan ko‘prik (bridge) tugunlari yamalanganini tasdiqlagach, taxminan 3,400 BTC qaytarildi. Hozircha 598 BTC qaytarilmagan bo‘lib, so‘nggi baholashlarda qariyb 47 mln $ga teng.   So‘ngra hujumchi Blockstreamning o‘z mablag‘laridan 10% mukofot talab qildi va talab rad etilsa, yana yo‘qotishlar bo‘lishini aytdi. Endi Blockstream qat’iy chiziq chizdi: garov puli yo‘q.   Mening fikrim: Bu bitta muzokaradan kattaroq masala. U kripto infratuzilmasi mas’uliyatli oshkor qilishni mukofotlashi yoki ruxsatsiz aktivlarni tortib olish muzokara kuchiga aylanishiga yo‘l qo‘yishini sinovdan o‘tkazadi.   Garov pulidan bosh tortish yo‘qolgan-BTC muammosini hal qilmaydi. Tiklash, javobgarlik va ishonchni qaytarish — yanada qiyinroq boblar.   Kriptoning o‘zida zaiflik tezda yamalanishi mumkin. Ammo u buzgan ishonchni tiklash mumkin emas.   ❓Ekspluatatsiya qilingan mablag‘larning ko‘pini qaytarib bersa, ularni ruxsatsiz olgan hujumchilar bunday holatda doimiy ravishda mukofot olishi kerakmi?   Izoh: Faqat axborot mazmuni; moliyaviy maslahat emas. Kripto katta xatarlarni o‘z ichiga oladi.   #CryptoSecurity #Bitcoin #GrowWithSAC $VTHO $METAB $0G #BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker
🚨 BLOCKSTREAM GAROVGA TO‘LAMAYDI: LIQUID’DAGI HUJUMCHI 47 MLN $LIK TUTILISHGA DUCH KELMOQDA 🚨

O‘g‘irlangan tangalar garovga aylansa, ishonch real jang maydoniga aylanadi.
Bu safar esa hujumchi jimlik narxini belgilamoqchi.

Blockstream Liquid Network’ning 320 mln dollarlik ekspluatatsiyasi ortidagi hujumchi talab qilgan to‘lovni to‘lashdan bosh tortdi. Ular ruxsatsiz qo‘lga kiritish va mablag‘larni ushlab qolishni qonuniy “white-hat” faoliyati emas, balki o‘g‘rilik deb atashdi.

Dastlabki ekspluatatsiya, zaiflik tufayli taqdim etilmagan (unbacked) L-BTC yaratilishi va uning real BTC ga aylantirilishiga imkon berganidan so‘ng, Liquid federatsiyasi hamyonidan qariyb 4,000 BTC ni oqizib yuborgan. Federatsiyaning kriptografik kalitlari buzib kirilgan deb xabar berilmagan.

Keyinchalik Blockstream ta’sirlangan ko‘prik (bridge) tugunlari yamalanganini tasdiqlagach, taxminan 3,400 BTC qaytarildi. Hozircha 598 BTC qaytarilmagan bo‘lib, so‘nggi baholashlarda qariyb 47 mln $ga teng.

So‘ngra hujumchi Blockstreamning o‘z mablag‘laridan 10% mukofot talab qildi va talab rad etilsa, yana yo‘qotishlar bo‘lishini aytdi. Endi Blockstream qat’iy chiziq chizdi: garov puli yo‘q.

Mening fikrim: Bu bitta muzokaradan kattaroq masala. U kripto infratuzilmasi mas’uliyatli oshkor qilishni mukofotlashi yoki ruxsatsiz aktivlarni tortib olish muzokara kuchiga aylanishiga yo‘l qo‘yishini sinovdan o‘tkazadi.

Garov pulidan bosh tortish yo‘qolgan-BTC muammosini hal qilmaydi. Tiklash, javobgarlik va ishonchni qaytarish — yanada qiyinroq boblar.

Kriptoning o‘zida zaiflik tezda yamalanishi mumkin. Ammo u buzgan ishonchni tiklash mumkin emas.

❓Ekspluatatsiya qilingan mablag‘larning ko‘pini qaytarib bersa, ularni ruxsatsiz olgan hujumchilar bunday holatda doimiy ravishda mukofot olishi kerakmi?

Izoh: Faqat axborot mazmuni; moliyaviy maslahat emas. Kripto katta xatarlarni o‘z ichiga oladi.

#CryptoSecurity #Bitcoin #GrowWithSAC $VTHO $METAB $0G
#BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker
See translation
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker 🚨 Blockstream Refuses To Pay Ransom To Liquid Attacker 🚨   The money was gone. The network was frozen. Then came the message from the attacker: fix the flaw first, and the Bitcoin could come back.   That threat has now taken another turn. Blockstream says it will not pay a ransom, arguing that taking assets without authorization and withholding them is theft, not responsible disclosure.   The incident began when roughly 4,000 BTC, worth about $320 million at the time, were withdrawn from Liquid's federation wallet. Investigations pointed toward a software vulnerability rather than a compromised private key.   After the vulnerability was patched, around 3,400 BTC were returned, leaving roughly 600 BTC still outstanding. Liquid has remained cautious about restoring normal operations while security work continues.   My take: refusing ransom is bigger than one incident. Paying attackers can create an incentive structure where exploiting critical infrastructure becomes a business model.   But the harder lesson is security architecture. A system can have sophisticated custody controls and still face serious risk when a software validation flaw creates an unexpected path to value.   For crypto users, the practical takeaway is simple: security is not just about protecting keys. Software logic, validation rules, recovery procedures, and coordinated upgrades matter just as much.   In crypto, the real test of security is not how safe a system looks before an attack, but how intelligently it responds after one.   ❓Would you support Blockstream's decision not to pay the ransom?   Disclaimer: This is informational content, not financial or investment advice.   #Bitcoin #CryptoSecurity #GrowWithSAC $BTC $ETH $XRP #BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker
🚨 Blockstream Refuses To Pay Ransom To Liquid Attacker 🚨

The money was gone. The network was frozen. Then came the message from the attacker: fix the flaw first, and the Bitcoin could come back.

That threat has now taken another turn. Blockstream says it will not pay a ransom, arguing that taking assets without authorization and withholding them is theft, not responsible disclosure.

The incident began when roughly 4,000 BTC, worth about $320 million at the time, were withdrawn from Liquid's federation wallet. Investigations pointed toward a software vulnerability rather than a compromised private key.

After the vulnerability was patched, around 3,400 BTC were returned, leaving roughly 600 BTC still outstanding. Liquid has remained cautious about restoring normal operations while security work continues.

My take: refusing ransom is bigger than one incident. Paying attackers can create an incentive structure where exploiting critical infrastructure becomes a business model.

But the harder lesson is security architecture. A system can have sophisticated custody controls and still face serious risk when a software validation flaw creates an unexpected path to value.

For crypto users, the practical takeaway is simple: security is not just about protecting keys. Software logic, validation rules, recovery procedures, and coordinated upgrades matter just as much.

In crypto, the real test of security is not how safe a system looks before an attack, but how intelligently it responds after one.

❓Would you support Blockstream's decision not to pay the ransom?

Disclaimer: This is informational content, not financial or investment advice.

#Bitcoin #CryptoSecurity #GrowWithSAC $BTC $ETH $XRP
#BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker
·
--
O‘suvchi
See translation
#BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker 🚨 BLOCKSTREAM REFUSES TO PAY RANSOM AFTER $320M LIQUID EXPLOIT A major security story is unfolding around Blockstream’s Liquid Network. On September 6, attackers exploited a vulnerability in Liquid’s software and withdrew roughly 4,000 BTC, worth around $320 million, from the network’s federation wallet. The attackers later claimed to be “white hats” and returned about 3,400 BTC after Blockstream patched the vulnerability. Roughly 600 BTC — around $47 million — remains outstanding. Now comes the latest twist: 🔴 Blockstream says it will NOT pay a ransom for the remaining Bitcoin. The company is taking the position that the incident was an exploit rather than a conventional ransom situation, while continuing efforts to recover the outstanding funds. The bigger lesson for crypto may be even more important than the dollar figure: Code security is only one layer of blockchain security. Validation logic, bridge mechanisms, federation controls, monitoring and emergency response can all become critical points of failure. For users and investors, this incident is another reminder to look beyond TVL and transaction speed and ask: ➡️ How are assets validated? ➡️ What happens when a critical bug is discovered? ➡️ Who can stop withdrawals during an emergency? ➡️ Can the system recover without relying on a hacker’s cooperation? The Liquid Network remains under security review as Blockstream and federation members work on additional fixes before a safe restart. Crypto infrastructure is becoming more powerful — but incidents like this show why security architecture matters just as much as scalability. $TFUEL $MET $RAY {spot}(RAYUSDT) {future}(METUSDT) {spot}(TFUELUSDT)
#BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker
🚨 BLOCKSTREAM REFUSES TO PAY RANSOM AFTER $320M LIQUID EXPLOIT
A major security story is unfolding around Blockstream’s Liquid Network.
On September 6, attackers exploited a vulnerability in Liquid’s software and withdrew roughly 4,000 BTC, worth around $320 million, from the network’s federation wallet.
The attackers later claimed to be “white hats” and returned about 3,400 BTC after Blockstream patched the vulnerability. Roughly 600 BTC — around $47 million — remains outstanding.
Now comes the latest twist:
🔴 Blockstream says it will NOT pay a ransom for the remaining Bitcoin.
The company is taking the position that the incident was an exploit rather than a conventional ransom situation, while continuing efforts to recover the outstanding funds.
The bigger lesson for crypto may be even more important than the dollar figure:
Code security is only one layer of blockchain security.
Validation logic, bridge mechanisms, federation controls, monitoring and emergency response can all become critical points of failure.
For users and investors, this incident is another reminder to look beyond TVL and transaction speed and ask:
➡️ How are assets validated?
➡️ What happens when a critical bug is discovered?
➡️ Who can stop withdrawals during an emergency?
➡️ Can the system recover without relying on a hacker’s cooperation?
The Liquid Network remains under security review as Blockstream and federation members work on additional fixes before a safe restart.
Crypto infrastructure is becoming more powerful — but incidents like this show why security architecture matters just as much as scalability.
$TFUEL $MET $RAY
See translation
#BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker Blockstream has reportedly refused to pay a ransom demanded by an attacker targeting the Liquid Network, a Bitcoin sidechain associated with the company. The incident has drawn attention across the cryptocurrency community as security threats against blockchain infrastructure continue to evolve. Rather than meeting the attacker’s demands, Blockstream is maintaining its position against ransom payments, emphasizing the importance of security, investigation, and resilience. The situation highlights the growing risks faced by crypto platforms, where attacks can potentially disrupt services and create financial losses. Market participants are closely watching developments, while the broader industry is reminded that strong cybersecurity measures, rapid response plans, and responsible incident management remain essential for protecting digital assets and network operations.
#BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker Blockstream has reportedly refused to pay a ransom demanded by an attacker targeting the Liquid Network, a Bitcoin sidechain associated with the company. The incident has drawn attention across the cryptocurrency community as security threats against blockchain infrastructure continue to evolve. Rather than meeting the attacker’s demands, Blockstream is maintaining its position against ransom payments, emphasizing the importance of security, investigation, and resilience. The situation highlights the growing risks faced by crypto platforms, where attacks can potentially disrupt services and create financial losses. Market participants are closely watching developments, while the broader industry is reminded that strong cybersecurity measures, rapid response plans, and responsible incident management remain essential for protecting digital assets and network operations.
See translation
Blockstream doing nothing is the right trade setup. Ransom payments don’t fix protocol flaws. They fund future attacks. Liquid’s outage isn’t about money it’s about trust in sidechain infrastructure. As a trader, I watch for liquidity shifts on BTC/USD, not narrative noise. If Blockstream pays, I’d avoid Liquid-related assets for 30+ days. I’m watching BTC volume on 1H charts. No position yet. The thing that proves me wrong: Liquid resumes normal operations within 48 hours without any ransom payment and BTC stays above $60k. What’s your take? #BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker Not financial advice. My levels, my risk.
Blockstream doing nothing is the right trade setup.

Ransom payments don’t fix protocol flaws. They fund future attacks.
Liquid’s outage isn’t about money it’s about trust in sidechain infrastructure.
As a trader, I watch for liquidity shifts on BTC/USD, not narrative noise.
If Blockstream pays, I’d avoid Liquid-related assets for 30+ days.

I’m watching BTC volume on 1H charts. No position yet.

The thing that proves me wrong: Liquid resumes normal operations within 48 hours without any ransom payment and BTC stays above $60k.

What’s your take? #BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker

Not financial advice. My levels, my risk.
See translation
#BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker Blockstream is reportedly refusing to pay a ransom following the major Liquid Network exploit, where roughly 4,000 BTC (~$320M) was drained. The bigger twist? 👀 The attackers claimed to be white-hat hackers and said they would return the funds after the vulnerability was fixed. Around 3,400 BTC has reportedly been returned, while roughly 598 BTC remains outstanding. 🔥 TRADE RADAR ⚠️ Crypto infrastructure risk remains elevated 🛡️ Security + custody are back in focus ₿ Bitcoin market sentiment could react to further developments 👀 Watch BTC volatility closely Would you trust a “white-hat” hacker who drains $300M+ first? 🤔👇 $RAY $SAGA $MARSCOIN #Blockstream #LiquidNetwork #CryptoSecurity #hacking
#BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker

Blockstream is reportedly refusing to pay a ransom following the major Liquid Network exploit, where roughly 4,000 BTC (~$320M) was drained.

The bigger twist? 👀
The attackers claimed to be white-hat hackers and said they would return the funds after the vulnerability was fixed. Around 3,400 BTC has reportedly been returned, while roughly 598 BTC remains outstanding.

🔥 TRADE RADAR

⚠️ Crypto infrastructure risk remains elevated

🛡️ Security + custody are back in focus

₿ Bitcoin market sentiment could react to further developments

👀 Watch BTC volatility closely

Would you trust a “white-hat” hacker who drains $300M+ first? 🤔👇

$RAY $SAGA $MARSCOIN
#Blockstream #LiquidNetwork #CryptoSecurity #hacking
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker 🚨 BLOCKSTREAM QASOS PULINI TO‘LASHDAN BOSH TORTDI! ⚠️ Habar qilinishicha, Blockstream Liquid hujumchisi tomonidan amalga oshirilgan katta miqyosdagi exploitdan so‘ng talab qilingan to‘lovni to‘lashdan bosh tortgan. 💰 Taxminan $320 mln jalb qilingan bo‘lsa, bu qaror zarar ko‘rgan mablag‘lar va kengroq kripto hamjamiyati uchun muhim oqibatlarga olib kelishi mumkin. To‘lovni rad etish hujumchilarni mukofotlashga qarshi kuchli signal yuborishi mumkin bo‘lsa-da, treyderlar o‘g‘irlangan mablag‘lar bilan keyin nima bo‘lishini diqqat bilan kuzatmoqda. 👀 🔥 To‘lov yo‘q. Kelishuv yo‘q. Endi bozor keyingi qadamni kutmoqda. #Blockstream #liquidnetwork #crypto
#blockstreamrefusestopayransomtoliquidattacker
🚨 BLOCKSTREAM QASOS PULINI TO‘LASHDAN BOSH TORTDI! ⚠️
Habar qilinishicha, Blockstream Liquid hujumchisi tomonidan amalga oshirilgan katta miqyosdagi exploitdan so‘ng talab qilingan to‘lovni to‘lashdan bosh tortgan.
💰 Taxminan $320 mln jalb qilingan bo‘lsa, bu qaror zarar ko‘rgan mablag‘lar va kengroq kripto hamjamiyati uchun muhim oqibatlarga olib kelishi mumkin.
To‘lovni rad etish hujumchilarni mukofotlashga qarshi kuchli signal yuborishi mumkin bo‘lsa-da, treyderlar o‘g‘irlangan mablag‘lar bilan keyin nima bo‘lishini diqqat bilan kuzatmoqda. 👀
🔥 To‘lov yo‘q. Kelishuv yo‘q. Endi bozor keyingi qadamni kutmoqda.
#Blockstream #liquidnetwork #crypto
·
--
Pasayuvchi
one2one121:
congratulations panda
🏛️ QONUNCHILIK YANGILANISHI: Senat qayta ko‘rib chiqilgan CLARITY qonuni matni bilan kursni o‘zgartirmoqda Senat CLARITY qonuniga yaqinda tarqatilgan tahrir hukumatning DeFi’ni qanday tartibga solmoqchi ekaniga nisbatan muhim burilish kiritmoqda. Muxtor kodni bevosita tartibga solishga urinish o‘rniga, yangilangan matn “markazlashmagan” bo‘lmagan protokol boshqaruvchilariga qaratilgan — ya’ni protokol qoidalari, yangilanishlar yoki foydalanuvchi mablag‘lari ustidan muhim nazoratni saqlab qoladigan identifikatsiyalanadigan shaxslar yoki muvofiqlashtirilgan subyektlar. 📍 Asosiy o‘zgartirishlar: Identifikatsiyalanadigan boshqaruvchilarga e’tibor: SEC va CFTC ro‘yxatdan o‘tish, faoliyat yuritish, oshkor qilish va nazorat bo‘yicha faoliyatga asoslangan qoidalarni yozishi kerak; bu qoidalar protokollar ustidan ma’muriy kirish yoki boshqaruv (governance) nazoratiga ega bo‘lgan tomonlarni aniq nishonga oladi. Neytral infratuzilmani saqlash: Faqat custodiya qilmaydigan dasturiy ta’minot hamda open-source taqsimlangan registrlar o‘z nomidan ro‘yxatdan o‘tishdan aniq ozod qilinadi. Xavfsizlik kengashlari uchun safe harbor: Favqulodda hodisalarga javob berishda ishtirok etish, multisig’lar yoki xavfsizlik kengashlarida qatnashishning o‘zi boshqaruvchi subyekt sifatida tasniflanishga olib kelmaydi. BSA / AML mapping: G‘aznachilik ushbu belgilangan “markazlashmagan” bo‘lmagan protokol boshqaruvchilari uchun Bank Secrecy Act majburiyatlari qanday tatbiq etilishini belgilab beradi. 💬 Bozor munozarasi: “Boshqaruvchilar”ni nishonga olish huquqiy aniqlikni haqiqatan beradimi, yoki dApps’larni moslik yukini chetlab o‘tish uchun butunlay admin kalitlarini bekor qilishga itarmaydimi? Fikringizni pastga yozing! 👇 Diagrammani ko‘rish uchun shu yerga bosing 👇️ {future}(TRUMPUSDT) {future}(XRPUSDT) {future}(SUIUSDT) $XRP $TRUMP $SUI #clarityactrevisiontorulenondeficontrollers #CPIWatch #TencentBackedEnflameToStartTradingAfter$911MIPO #BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker #LiquidNetworkResumesBlocksAfter$320MExploit
🏛️ QONUNCHILIK YANGILANISHI: Senat qayta ko‘rib chiqilgan CLARITY qonuni matni bilan kursni o‘zgartirmoqda

Senat CLARITY qonuniga yaqinda tarqatilgan tahrir hukumatning DeFi’ni qanday tartibga solmoqchi ekaniga nisbatan muhim burilish kiritmoqda.

Muxtor kodni bevosita tartibga solishga urinish o‘rniga, yangilangan matn “markazlashmagan” bo‘lmagan protokol boshqaruvchilariga qaratilgan — ya’ni protokol qoidalari, yangilanishlar yoki foydalanuvchi mablag‘lari ustidan muhim nazoratni saqlab qoladigan identifikatsiyalanadigan shaxslar yoki muvofiqlashtirilgan subyektlar.

📍 Asosiy o‘zgartirishlar:
Identifikatsiyalanadigan boshqaruvchilarga e’tibor: SEC va CFTC ro‘yxatdan o‘tish, faoliyat yuritish, oshkor qilish va nazorat bo‘yicha faoliyatga asoslangan qoidalarni yozishi kerak; bu qoidalar protokollar ustidan ma’muriy kirish yoki boshqaruv (governance) nazoratiga ega bo‘lgan tomonlarni aniq nishonga oladi.

Neytral infratuzilmani saqlash: Faqat custodiya qilmaydigan dasturiy ta’minot hamda open-source taqsimlangan registrlar o‘z nomidan ro‘yxatdan o‘tishdan aniq ozod qilinadi.

Xavfsizlik kengashlari uchun safe harbor: Favqulodda hodisalarga javob berishda ishtirok etish, multisig’lar yoki xavfsizlik kengashlarida qatnashishning o‘zi boshqaruvchi subyekt sifatida tasniflanishga olib kelmaydi.

BSA / AML mapping: G‘aznachilik ushbu belgilangan “markazlashmagan” bo‘lmagan protokol boshqaruvchilari uchun Bank Secrecy Act majburiyatlari qanday tatbiq etilishini belgilab beradi.

💬 Bozor munozarasi:
“Boshqaruvchilar”ni nishonga olish huquqiy aniqlikni haqiqatan beradimi, yoki dApps’larni moslik yukini chetlab o‘tish uchun butunlay admin kalitlarini bekor qilishga itarmaydimi? Fikringizni pastga yozing! 👇

Diagrammani ko‘rish uchun shu yerga bosing 👇️

$XRP $TRUMP $SUI
#clarityactrevisiontorulenondeficontrollers #CPIWatch #TencentBackedEnflameToStartTradingAfter$911MIPO #BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker #LiquidNetworkResumesBlocksAfter$320MExploit
See translation
$ZEC 摸顶后大跌,后续行情如何看待🔥 昨天我就发了第一张图$ZEC 空单积累比较多,多头可能会摸到1297附近清算这批空单 因为从图一看上方积累空头比较,下方多单清算明显不划算,并且昨天ZEC多次在1100下方下探收回,明显对下方多单筹码不满意,我就说了还没有结束,还会触到1300附近吃掉一波空单。 昨天摸到1297马上就下跌。庄家成功清算一波空单,截止到现在清算地图,空单强度仍然大于多单,并且$ZEC 仍旧在1100上方,说明目前多头趋势还没有散,热度也还在。下跌也是受大盘影响 所以我大胆预测等行情稍转还会向上攻,估计反弹到1200附近才会进入下跌,这可能是多单最后解套的位置,可以在这个附近做多,到1190附近止盈,跌破1050及时止损。#BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker
$ZEC 摸顶后大跌,后续行情如何看待🔥

昨天我就发了第一张图$ZEC 空单积累比较多,多头可能会摸到1297附近清算这批空单

因为从图一看上方积累空头比较,下方多单清算明显不划算,并且昨天ZEC多次在1100下方下探收回,明显对下方多单筹码不满意,我就说了还没有结束,还会触到1300附近吃掉一波空单。

昨天摸到1297马上就下跌。庄家成功清算一波空单,截止到现在清算地图,空单强度仍然大于多单,并且$ZEC 仍旧在1100上方,说明目前多头趋势还没有散,热度也还在。下跌也是受大盘影响

所以我大胆预测等行情稍转还会向上攻,估计反弹到1200附近才会进入下跌,这可能是多单最后解套的位置,可以在这个附近做多,到1190附近止盈,跌破1050及时止损。#BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker
币圈没有神话:
被btc带动回调罢了,机构也要减仓降低风险,等下波大盘拉升,zec又要突破新高,有钱没钱的都买现货就行了。
Sizningcha, Fed foizni oshiradimi yoki ushlab turadimi? O'tgan haftadagi qishloq bo'lmagan ish o'rinlari (Nonfarm Payrolls) prognozlarni ortda qoldirdi va endi barcha e’tibor bugungi CPI ko‘rsatkichiga qaratilgan: u 8:30 AM ET da e’lon qilinadi. Ko‘cha/bozor konsensusi sarlavhali ko‘rsatkich 3,4% YoY (0,4% MoM) bo‘lishini kutmoqda; asosiy (core) ko‘rsatkich esa 2,4% YoY (0,2% MoM) — ya’ni iyul oyidagi ko‘rsatkichga nisbatan deyarli o‘zgarmaydi. Nega bu e’lon ayniqsa muhim: Fedning 15–16-sentabrdagi yig‘ilishi juda yaqin, kecha esa PPI 5,4% YoY darajasida “qizib” chiqqan. Bu esa 10 yillik obligatsiya daromadliligini (yield) 4,85% atrofida ushlab turibdi. Agar core CPI kutilgan 0,2% o‘rniga 0,3% yoki undan yuqori chiqsa, meningcha bu Fedni yanada “hawkish” (qattiqroq) yo‘nalishda ushlab turish foydasiga tarozini og‘diradi, ya’ni yumshashga shoshilmaydi. Kuchli mehnat bozori va yopishqoq (sticky) asosiy inflyatsiya ularga kesish uchun unchalik ko‘p joy qoldirmaydi. Mening fikrim: men ochiqdan-ochiq oshirishdan ko‘ra “ushlab turish, lekin hawkish ohang” tomonga moyilman. Bitta issiq PPI ko‘rsatkichining o‘zi foizni oshirishga majburlash uchun yetarli emas, ammo u har qanday stavkani pasaytirish haqidagi suhbatni kechiktirishi mumkin. O'sish (bullish)mi yoki pasayish (bearish)mi? Men ehtiyotkorlik bilan qarayapman — to‘liq bearish emas, lekin hech narsani quvib ketmayapman ham. BTC kechagi PPI ta’siridan keyin hali ham $77,000 atrofida ko‘rinmoqda va CPI e’lonining o‘zida ham shunga o‘xshash o‘zgaruvchanlik (volatilnost) bo‘lishini kutaman. Bugun men ko‘proq kuzatayotgan narsa — gold (oltin). Chunki inflyatsiya bo‘yicha kutilmagan “issiq” xabarlar uni kripto kabi risk aktivlari sotilganda ham xedj sifatida qo‘llab-quvvatlashga moyil. Hozircha men ikkalasidan ham pozitsiyada yo‘q — raqam qanday tushishini ko‘rishim kerak, keyin biror qaror qabul qilaman. Sizningcha, bugungi CPI hawkish stsenariyni tasdiqlaydimi yoki u kutilganidan “sovuqroq” chiqib, risk ishtahasi yana qaytishiga yo‘l ochadimi? #CPIWatch #CPI #OracleJumpsOver6%OnEarningsBeat #CLARITYActRevisionToRuleNonDeFiControllers #BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker $RAY {spot}(RAYUSDT) $TFUEL {spot}(TFUELUSDT) $XAU {future}(XAUUSDT)
Sizningcha, Fed foizni oshiradimi yoki ushlab turadimi?

O'tgan haftadagi qishloq bo'lmagan ish o'rinlari (Nonfarm Payrolls) prognozlarni ortda qoldirdi va endi barcha e’tibor bugungi CPI ko‘rsatkichiga qaratilgan: u 8:30 AM ET da e’lon qilinadi. Ko‘cha/bozor konsensusi sarlavhali ko‘rsatkich 3,4% YoY (0,4% MoM) bo‘lishini kutmoqda; asosiy (core) ko‘rsatkich esa 2,4% YoY (0,2% MoM) — ya’ni iyul oyidagi ko‘rsatkichga nisbatan deyarli o‘zgarmaydi.

Nega bu e’lon ayniqsa muhim: Fedning 15–16-sentabrdagi yig‘ilishi juda yaqin, kecha esa PPI 5,4% YoY darajasida “qizib” chiqqan. Bu esa 10 yillik obligatsiya daromadliligini (yield) 4,85% atrofida ushlab turibdi. Agar core CPI kutilgan 0,2% o‘rniga 0,3% yoki undan yuqori chiqsa, meningcha bu Fedni yanada “hawkish” (qattiqroq) yo‘nalishda ushlab turish foydasiga tarozini og‘diradi, ya’ni yumshashga shoshilmaydi. Kuchli mehnat bozori va yopishqoq (sticky) asosiy inflyatsiya ularga kesish uchun unchalik ko‘p joy qoldirmaydi.

Mening fikrim: men ochiqdan-ochiq oshirishdan ko‘ra “ushlab turish, lekin hawkish ohang” tomonga moyilman. Bitta issiq PPI ko‘rsatkichining o‘zi foizni oshirishga majburlash uchun yetarli emas, ammo u har qanday stavkani pasaytirish haqidagi suhbatni kechiktirishi mumkin.

O'sish (bullish)mi yoki pasayish (bearish)mi? Men ehtiyotkorlik bilan qarayapman — to‘liq bearish emas, lekin hech narsani quvib ketmayapman ham. BTC kechagi PPI ta’siridan keyin hali ham $77,000 atrofida ko‘rinmoqda va CPI e’lonining o‘zida ham shunga o‘xshash o‘zgaruvchanlik (volatilnost) bo‘lishini kutaman. Bugun men ko‘proq kuzatayotgan narsa — gold (oltin). Chunki inflyatsiya bo‘yicha kutilmagan “issiq” xabarlar uni kripto kabi risk aktivlari sotilganda ham xedj sifatida qo‘llab-quvvatlashga moyil. Hozircha men ikkalasidan ham pozitsiyada yo‘q — raqam qanday tushishini ko‘rishim kerak, keyin biror qaror qabul qilaman.

Sizningcha, bugungi CPI hawkish stsenariyni tasdiqlaydimi yoki u kutilganidan “sovuqroq” chiqib, risk ishtahasi yana qaytishiga yo‘l ochadimi?

#CPIWatch #CPI
#OracleJumpsOver6%OnEarningsBeat #CLARITYActRevisionToRuleNonDeFiControllers #BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker

$RAY
$TFUEL
$XAU
See translation
Pasar $MARSCOIN /USDT (1H) menunjukkan momentum bullish breakout setelah berhasil mematahkan tren penurunan dan menembus garis Moving Average utama serta level resitansi horizontal di $0.11930. Analisis Teknikal * Struktur Tren: Terjadi pembalikan arah (trend reversal) jangka pendek setelah harga membentuk dasar yang solid (bottoming) di kisaran $0.1000 – $0.1100. * Indikator MA: Candlestick 1 jam terbaru secara impulsif menembus EMA jangka panjang (garis oranye), didukung EMA jangka pendek (garis ungu) yang mulai melengkung naik (bullish crossover). * Volume: Lonjakan volume beli (buying volume expansion) mengonfirmasi minat pasar pada penembusan area $0.11930. Sinyal Trading (Spot / Perpetual) | Parameter | Level Harga / Keterangan | | Bias | Bullish (Long) | | Area Entry | $0.1200 – $0.1250 (Menunggu pullback/retest, hindari mengejar harga di pucuk) | Stop Loss (SL) | $0.1080 (Di bawah swing low & support psikologis $0.1100) | | Take Profit 1 (TP1) | $0.1480 (Resistance lokal dari lower high 8 Sep) | | Take Profit 2 (TP2) | $0.1800 (Area supply pertengahan) | | Take Profit 3 (TP3) | $0.2150 (Target re-test puncak swing high sebelumnya) | | Risk to Reward Ratio | ~1 : 2.5 | Catatan & Manajemen Risiko * Konfirmasi Tutup Candle: Tunggu candle 1H saat ini close terlebih dahulu di atas $0.1250 untuk memastikan penembusan valid dan bukan jebakan (fakeout). * Leverage: Jika bertransaksi di pasar Futures/Perpetual contract, gunakan leverage konservatif (maksimal 3x–5x) mengingat volatilitas koin ini terbilang tinggi. * Batas Risiko: Batasi risiko kerugian maksimal 1–2% dari total ekuitas akun per transaksi. {future}(MARSCOINUSDT) #BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker
Pasar $MARSCOIN /USDT (1H) menunjukkan momentum bullish breakout setelah berhasil mematahkan tren penurunan dan menembus garis Moving Average utama serta level resitansi horizontal di $0.11930.
Analisis Teknikal
* Struktur Tren: Terjadi pembalikan arah (trend reversal) jangka pendek setelah harga membentuk dasar yang solid (bottoming) di kisaran $0.1000 – $0.1100.
* Indikator MA: Candlestick 1 jam terbaru secara impulsif menembus EMA jangka panjang (garis oranye), didukung EMA jangka pendek (garis ungu) yang mulai melengkung naik (bullish crossover).
* Volume: Lonjakan volume beli (buying volume expansion) mengonfirmasi minat pasar pada penembusan area $0.11930.
Sinyal Trading (Spot / Perpetual)
| Parameter | Level Harga / Keterangan |
| Bias | Bullish (Long) |
| Area Entry | $0.1200 – $0.1250 (Menunggu pullback/retest, hindari mengejar harga di pucuk)
| Stop Loss (SL) | $0.1080 (Di bawah swing low & support psikologis $0.1100) |
| Take Profit 1 (TP1) | $0.1480 (Resistance lokal dari lower high 8 Sep) |
| Take Profit 2 (TP2) | $0.1800 (Area supply pertengahan) |
| Take Profit 3 (TP3) | $0.2150 (Target re-test puncak swing high sebelumnya) |
| Risk to Reward Ratio | ~1 : 2.5 |
Catatan & Manajemen Risiko
* Konfirmasi Tutup Candle: Tunggu candle 1H saat ini close terlebih dahulu di atas $0.1250 untuk memastikan penembusan valid dan bukan jebakan (fakeout).
* Leverage: Jika bertransaksi di pasar Futures/Perpetual contract, gunakan leverage konservatif (maksimal 3x–5x) mengingat volatilitas koin ini terbilang tinggi.
* Batas Risiko: Batasi risiko kerugian maksimal 1–2% dari total ekuitas akun per transaksi.

#BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker
CPI real Fed trigger bo‘lishi mumkin Eng so‘nggi ish o‘rinlari bo‘yicha ma’lumot Fedga o‘ylab ko‘rish uchun sabab berdi: avgust oyida nonfermal payrolllar 162K ga oshdi, ishsizlik esa 4.1% darajasida qoldi. Mehnat bozori qulab tushayotgani yo‘q, biroq inflyatsiya hali ham kattaroq muammo. PPI qayta narx bosimini ko‘rsatayotgani va energiya xarajatlari yuqoriligicha qolayotganini hisobga olsak, yaqinlashayotgan CPI hisoboti Fedning keyingi qadamini hal qiluvchi omil bo‘lishi mumkin. Mehnat statistikasi byurosi +1 Mening fikrim: qisqa muddatda riskli aktivlar bo‘yicha men biroz ayiq kayfiyatidaman. Agar CPI kutilgandan issiqroq chiqsa, foiz stavkasini oshirish ehtimoli ortadi; bu dollarni mustahkamlashi, daromadlilik (yields)ni yuqoriroq olib chiqishi va fondlar hamda boshqa riskli aktivlarga bosim o‘tkazishi mumkin. Bozorlar hatto 25 bazis-bandga oshirish bo‘yicha muhim ehtimolni narxga kiritib qo‘ygan. Biroq, agar CPI sovish belgilarini aniq ko‘rsatsa, Fed ushlab turish uchun ko‘proq imkoniyatga ega bo‘lishi mumkin. Bu esa xaridorlarni tezda aksiyalar va oltin bozoriga qaytarishi ehtimoli bor. Mening uchun CPI — faqat sarlavhadagi raqam emas, balki core inflyatsiya joriy inflyatsiya hikoyasini tasdiqlaydimi yoki inkor qiladimi — shuning uchun muhim bo‘lgan asosiy volatillik triggeridir. Buqa yoki ayiq? CPI bozorda aniq yo‘nalish bermaguncha men ehtiyotkor bo‘lib qolaman. #CPIWatch #OracleJumpsOver6%OnEarningsBeat #CLARITYActRevisionToRuleNonDeFiControllers #BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker #TrumpDeclinesSaudiRequestToStrikeHouthis $TFUEL {spot}(TFUELUSDT) $LAB {future}(LABUSDT) $4Stock {alpha}(560xd270d4e1ec6e6e0d28c0ecb8be966ec75997ffff)
CPI real Fed trigger bo‘lishi mumkin

Eng so‘nggi ish o‘rinlari bo‘yicha ma’lumot Fedga o‘ylab ko‘rish uchun sabab berdi: avgust oyida nonfermal payrolllar 162K ga oshdi, ishsizlik esa 4.1% darajasida qoldi. Mehnat bozori qulab tushayotgani yo‘q, biroq inflyatsiya hali ham kattaroq muammo. PPI qayta narx bosimini ko‘rsatayotgani va energiya xarajatlari yuqoriligicha qolayotganini hisobga olsak, yaqinlashayotgan CPI hisoboti Fedning keyingi qadamini hal qiluvchi omil bo‘lishi mumkin.

Mehnat statistikasi byurosi +1
Mening fikrim: qisqa muddatda riskli aktivlar bo‘yicha men biroz ayiq kayfiyatidaman. Agar CPI kutilgandan issiqroq chiqsa, foiz stavkasini oshirish ehtimoli ortadi; bu dollarni mustahkamlashi, daromadlilik (yields)ni yuqoriroq olib chiqishi va fondlar hamda boshqa riskli aktivlarga bosim o‘tkazishi mumkin. Bozorlar hatto 25 bazis-bandga oshirish bo‘yicha muhim ehtimolni narxga kiritib qo‘ygan.

Biroq, agar CPI sovish belgilarini aniq ko‘rsatsa, Fed ushlab turish uchun ko‘proq imkoniyatga ega bo‘lishi mumkin. Bu esa xaridorlarni tezda aksiyalar va oltin bozoriga qaytarishi ehtimoli bor.

Mening uchun CPI — faqat sarlavhadagi raqam emas, balki core inflyatsiya joriy inflyatsiya hikoyasini tasdiqlaydimi yoki inkor qiladimi — shuning uchun muhim bo‘lgan asosiy volatillik triggeridir.
Buqa yoki ayiq? CPI bozorda aniq yo‘nalish bermaguncha men ehtiyotkor bo‘lib qolaman.

#CPIWatch

#OracleJumpsOver6%OnEarningsBeat #CLARITYActRevisionToRuleNonDeFiControllers #BlockstreamRefusesToPayRansomToLiquidAttacker #TrumpDeclinesSaudiRequestToStrikeHouthis

$TFUEL
$LAB
$4Stock
MAX JOHNS:
The market is already preparing for a big reaction. The important question is whether CPI beats or misses expectations.
Ko‘proq kontentni ko‘rish uchun tizimga kiring
Binance Square'da global kriptovalyuta foydalanuvchilariga qo‘shiling
⚡️ Kriptovalyuta haqida eng so‘nggi va foydali ma’lumotlarni oling.
💬 Dunyoning eng yirik kriptovalyuta birjasi tomonidan ishonchli deb topilgan.
👍 Tasdiqlangan mualliflardan haqiqiy tahlillarni kashf eting.
Email / telefon raqami