CryptoQuant Quicktake
8.2k Posts
CryptoQuant Quicktake
Square Verified+Report
Block User
CryptoQuant.com - Leading On-chain Data/Analytics Provider
0 Following
22.8K+ Followers
26.8K+ Liked
Posts
Article
Bitcoin Must Reclaim Holder Cost Basis to Confirm Trend ReversalThe Realized Price UTXO Age Bands indicate that the realized prices of the 1-3 month and 3-6 month holder cohorts have converged near the current market structure, both sitting around the low $70K area.
Historically, the convergence of these younger holder cost bases often reflects a period of market transition, as recently accumulated coins begin to change hands at similar prices. At present, both realized price levels remain well above Bitcoin's spot price, implying that these cohorts are still holding unrealized losses.
This reinforces the technical picture. While Bitcoin has recovered from its June lows, it remains below the realized cost basis of recent investors, suggesting that sentiment has not fully shifted back in favor of sustained accumulation. A recovery above these realized price levels would strengthen the case for a broader trend reversal, whereas continued rejection below them would support the view that the current advance is still a relief rally within the broader bearish structure.
Written by ShayanMarkets
Bitcoin Must Reclaim Holder Cost Basis to Confirm Trend Reversal
The Realized Price UTXO Age Bands indicate that the realized prices of the 1-3 month and 3-6 month holder cohorts have converged near the current market structure, both sitting around the low $70K area.
Historically, the convergence of these younger holder cost bases often reflects a period of market transition, as recently accumulated coins begin to change hands at similar prices. At present, both realized price levels remain well above Bitcoin's spot price, implying that these cohorts are still holding unrealized losses.
This reinforces the technical picture. While Bitcoin has recovered from its June lows, it remains below the realized cost basis of recent investors, suggesting that sentiment has not fully shifted back in favor of sustained accumulation. A recovery above these realized price levels would strengthen the case for a broader trend reversal, whereas continued rejection below them would support the view that the current advance is still a relief rally within the broader bearish structure.
Written by ShayanMarkets
Historically, the convergence of these younger holder cost bases often reflects a period of market transition, as recently accumulated coins begin to change hands at similar prices. At present, both realized price levels remain well above Bitcoin's spot price, implying that these cohorts are still holding unrealized losses.
This reinforces the technical picture. While Bitcoin has recovered from its June lows, it remains below the realized cost basis of recent investors, suggesting that sentiment has not fully shifted back in favor of sustained accumulation. A recovery above these realized price levels would strengthen the case for a broader trend reversal, whereas continued rejection below them would support the view that the current advance is still a relief rally within the broader bearish structure.
Written by ShayanMarkets
13
Article
Crypto Market Weekly Outlook: Confidence Returns As Policy Tailwinds Meet Improving Macro ConditionsThis week, the crypto market shifted from fear-driven trading toward cautious optimism. Bitcoin climbed from around $63,000–64,000 to briefly test the $65,000–66,000 range before easing on profit-taking. More important than the price move was the gradual transition from a short-covering rally to one increasingly supported by spot demand.
Spot buying improved across major exchanges, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded renewed inflows, and long-term holders continued accumulating coins sold by short-term traders. This suggests that stronger hands are absorbing supply, although U.S. spot demand has not yet fully recovered and part of the rally still reflects derivatives activity and short liquidations.
From a behavioral finance perspective, many investors who experienced June’s sharp decline remain influenced by loss aversion. As prices recover, they are more likely to sell near their entry levels. The market’s ability to absorb this selling pressure without significant weakness is an encouraging sign of improving market structure.
Investor sentiment has clearly improved, supported by softer U.S. inflation data, easing rate expectations, stronger equity markets, and growing optimism around crypto regulation in both the United States and Japan. Progress on market structure legislation, stablecoin regulation, and financial reforms is reinforcing the long-term investment case for digital assets.
However, optimism should remain measured. Higher leverage without sustained spot demand could increase volatility. Next week, investors should watch three key factors: whether ETF inflows continue, whether spot demand strengthens further, and whether Bitcoin can maintain support around $64,000–66,000 despite profit-taking.
The market has improved significantly, but confirmation of a durable bull trend will depend on consistent capital inflows rather than expectations alone.
Written by XWIN Japan
Crypto Market Weekly Outlook: Confidence Returns As Policy Tailwinds Meet Improving Macro Conditions
This week, the crypto market shifted from fear-driven trading toward cautious optimism. Bitcoin climbed from around $63,000–64,000 to briefly test the $65,000–66,000 range before easing on profit-taking. More important than the price move was the gradual transition from a short-covering rally to one increasingly supported by spot demand.
Spot buying improved across major exchanges, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded renewed inflows, and long-term holders continued accumulating coins sold by short-term traders. This suggests that stronger hands are absorbing supply, although U.S. spot demand has not yet fully recovered and part of the rally still reflects derivatives activity and short liquidations.
From a behavioral finance perspective, many investors who experienced June’s sharp decline remain influenced by loss aversion. As prices recover, they are more likely to sell near their entry levels. The market’s ability to absorb this selling pressure without significant weakness is an encouraging sign of improving market structure.
Investor sentiment has clearly improved, supported by softer U.S. inflation data, easing rate expectations, stronger equity markets, and growing optimism around crypto regulation in both the United States and Japan. Progress on market structure legislation, stablecoin regulation, and financial reforms is reinforcing the long-term investment case for digital assets.
However, optimism should remain measured. Higher leverage without sustained spot demand could increase volatility. Next week, investors should watch three key factors: whether ETF inflows continue, whether spot demand strengthens further, and whether Bitcoin can maintain support around $64,000–66,000 despite profit-taking.
The market has improved significantly, but confirmation of a durable bull trend will depend on consistent capital inflows rather than expectations alone.
Written by XWIN Japan
Spot buying improved across major exchanges, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded renewed inflows, and long-term holders continued accumulating coins sold by short-term traders. This suggests that stronger hands are absorbing supply, although U.S. spot demand has not yet fully recovered and part of the rally still reflects derivatives activity and short liquidations.
From a behavioral finance perspective, many investors who experienced June’s sharp decline remain influenced by loss aversion. As prices recover, they are more likely to sell near their entry levels. The market’s ability to absorb this selling pressure without significant weakness is an encouraging sign of improving market structure.
Investor sentiment has clearly improved, supported by softer U.S. inflation data, easing rate expectations, stronger equity markets, and growing optimism around crypto regulation in both the United States and Japan. Progress on market structure legislation, stablecoin regulation, and financial reforms is reinforcing the long-term investment case for digital assets.
However, optimism should remain measured. Higher leverage without sustained spot demand could increase volatility. Next week, investors should watch three key factors: whether ETF inflows continue, whether spot demand strengthens further, and whether Bitcoin can maintain support around $64,000–66,000 despite profit-taking.
The market has improved significantly, but confirmation of a durable bull trend will depend on consistent capital inflows rather than expectations alone.
Written by XWIN Japan
1
229
Article
Crypto Market Weekly Outlook: Confidence Returns As Policy Tailwinds Meet Improving Macro ConditionsThis week, the crypto market shifted from fear-driven trading toward cautious optimism. Bitcoin climbed from around $63,000–64,000 to briefly test the $65,000–66,000 range before easing on profit-taking. More important than the price move was the gradual transition from a short-covering rally to one increasingly supported by spot demand.
Spot buying improved across major exchanges, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded renewed inflows, and long-term holders continued accumulating coins sold by short-term traders. This suggests that stronger hands are absorbing supply, although U.S. spot demand has not yet fully recovered and part of the rally still reflects derivatives activity and short liquidations.
From a behavioral finance perspective, many investors who experienced June’s sharp decline remain influenced by loss aversion. As prices recover, they are more likely to sell near their entry levels. The market’s ability to absorb this selling pressure without significant weakness is an encouraging sign of improving market structure.
Investor sentiment has clearly improved, supported by softer U.S. inflation data, easing rate expectations, stronger equity markets, and growing optimism around crypto regulation in both the United States and Japan. Progress on market structure legislation, stablecoin regulation, and financial reforms is reinforcing the long-term investment case for digital assets.
However, optimism should remain measured. Higher leverage without sustained spot demand could increase volatility. Next week, investors should watch three key factors: whether ETF inflows continue, whether spot demand strengthens further, and whether Bitcoin can maintain support around $64,000–66,000 despite profit-taking.
The market has improved significantly, but confirmation of a durable bull trend will depend on consistent capital inflows rather than expectations alone.
Written by XWIN Japan
Crypto Market Weekly Outlook: Confidence Returns As Policy Tailwinds Meet Improving Macro Conditions
This week, the crypto market shifted from fear-driven trading toward cautious optimism. Bitcoin climbed from around $63,000–64,000 to briefly test the $65,000–66,000 range before easing on profit-taking. More important than the price move was the gradual transition from a short-covering rally to one increasingly supported by spot demand.
Spot buying improved across major exchanges, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded renewed inflows, and long-term holders continued accumulating coins sold by short-term traders. This suggests that stronger hands are absorbing supply, although U.S. spot demand has not yet fully recovered and part of the rally still reflects derivatives activity and short liquidations.
From a behavioral finance perspective, many investors who experienced June’s sharp decline remain influenced by loss aversion. As prices recover, they are more likely to sell near their entry levels. The market’s ability to absorb this selling pressure without significant weakness is an encouraging sign of improving market structure.
Investor sentiment has clearly improved, supported by softer U.S. inflation data, easing rate expectations, stronger equity markets, and growing optimism around crypto regulation in both the United States and Japan. Progress on market structure legislation, stablecoin regulation, and financial reforms is reinforcing the long-term investment case for digital assets.
However, optimism should remain measured. Higher leverage without sustained spot demand could increase volatility. Next week, investors should watch three key factors: whether ETF inflows continue, whether spot demand strengthens further, and whether Bitcoin can maintain support around $64,000–66,000 despite profit-taking.
The market has improved significantly, but confirmation of a durable bull trend will depend on consistent capital inflows rather than expectations alone.
Written by XWIN Japan
Spot buying improved across major exchanges, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded renewed inflows, and long-term holders continued accumulating coins sold by short-term traders. This suggests that stronger hands are absorbing supply, although U.S. spot demand has not yet fully recovered and part of the rally still reflects derivatives activity and short liquidations.
From a behavioral finance perspective, many investors who experienced June’s sharp decline remain influenced by loss aversion. As prices recover, they are more likely to sell near their entry levels. The market’s ability to absorb this selling pressure without significant weakness is an encouraging sign of improving market structure.
Investor sentiment has clearly improved, supported by softer U.S. inflation data, easing rate expectations, stronger equity markets, and growing optimism around crypto regulation in both the United States and Japan. Progress on market structure legislation, stablecoin regulation, and financial reforms is reinforcing the long-term investment case for digital assets.
However, optimism should remain measured. Higher leverage without sustained spot demand could increase volatility. Next week, investors should watch three key factors: whether ETF inflows continue, whether spot demand strengthens further, and whether Bitcoin can maintain support around $64,000–66,000 despite profit-taking.
The market has improved significantly, but confirmation of a durable bull trend will depend on consistent capital inflows rather than expectations alone.
Written by XWIN Japan
1
223
Article
BTC On-Chain: Leverage Cools, Bias Turns Slightly BullishToday’s on-chain data points to a neutral to slightly bullish setup, as leverage pressure has eased while short-term sell pressure remains limited.
Exchange netflow was -204 BTC, marking a second consecutive day of outflows. However, the two-day total was only about 225 BTC, so the move is constructive but still too small to confirm strong accumulation.
Seven-day netflow showed roughly 2,196 BTC of inflows, while the 14-day figure remained around 8,197 BTC in net outflows. The mixed flow suggests a volatile liquidity adjustment phase rather than a clear trend.
Funding fell to 0.00225, down 52.8% from the previous day and well below the seven-day average of 0.00520. Long positioning still has a slight edge, but crowded leverage and excessive optimism have eased.
Open interest stood near $21.3 billion, up 0.24% on the day but lower than both seven and 14 days ago. This suggests limited re-entry rather than aggressive new leverage.
The evidence supports roughly a 55% probability of a neutral to slightly bullish scenario. This view would weaken if exchange inflows expand or if funding and open interest rise sharply together.
Overall, exchange outflows remain modest, funding has cooled, and open interest is below recent highs. Tomorrow, the focus should be on whether larger outflows continue and whether open interest rises gradually without renewed funding pressure.
Written by CoinNiel
BTC On-Chain: Leverage Cools, Bias Turns Slightly Bullish
Today’s on-chain data points to a neutral to slightly bullish setup, as leverage pressure has eased while short-term sell pressure remains limited.
Exchange netflow was -204 BTC, marking a second consecutive day of outflows. However, the two-day total was only about 225 BTC, so the move is constructive but still too small to confirm strong accumulation.
Seven-day netflow showed roughly 2,196 BTC of inflows, while the 14-day figure remained around 8,197 BTC in net outflows. The mixed flow suggests a volatile liquidity adjustment phase rather than a clear trend.
Funding fell to 0.00225, down 52.8% from the previous day and well below the seven-day average of 0.00520. Long positioning still has a slight edge, but crowded leverage and excessive optimism have eased.
Open interest stood near $21.3 billion, up 0.24% on the day but lower than both seven and 14 days ago. This suggests limited re-entry rather than aggressive new leverage.
The evidence supports roughly a 55% probability of a neutral to slightly bullish scenario. This view would weaken if exchange inflows expand or if funding and open interest rise sharply together.
Overall, exchange outflows remain modest, funding has cooled, and open interest is below recent highs. Tomorrow, the focus should be on whether larger outflows continue and whether open interest rises gradually without renewed funding pressure.
Written by CoinNiel
Exchange netflow was -204 BTC, marking a second consecutive day of outflows. However, the two-day total was only about 225 BTC, so the move is constructive but still too small to confirm strong accumulation.
Seven-day netflow showed roughly 2,196 BTC of inflows, while the 14-day figure remained around 8,197 BTC in net outflows. The mixed flow suggests a volatile liquidity adjustment phase rather than a clear trend.
Funding fell to 0.00225, down 52.8% from the previous day and well below the seven-day average of 0.00520. Long positioning still has a slight edge, but crowded leverage and excessive optimism have eased.
Open interest stood near $21.3 billion, up 0.24% on the day but lower than both seven and 14 days ago. This suggests limited re-entry rather than aggressive new leverage.
The evidence supports roughly a 55% probability of a neutral to slightly bullish scenario. This view would weaken if exchange inflows expand or if funding and open interest rise sharply together.
Overall, exchange outflows remain modest, funding has cooled, and open interest is below recent highs. Tomorrow, the focus should be on whether larger outflows continue and whether open interest rises gradually without renewed funding pressure.
Written by CoinNiel
128
Article
The End of the Bear Market Is Coming Into ViewThe end of the bear market is approaching.
The bear market has now been in full swing for nine months, taking a toll on both STH and LTH alike.
As a reminder, STH refers to BTC holders <6 months, while LTH refers to holders >6 months.
In this chart, supply held for more than 7 years has been excluded from the LTH cost basis in order to better reflect the portion of supply that is economically active and held by LTH.
The end-of-bear-market signal has just flashed. This signal is defined by the downward crossover of the STH/LTH cost basis (with a 3-day confirmation window to validate the signal).
This doesn't mean the bear market ends the moment the signal fires or the bottom is in, but it indicates we are entering its final phase, a period during which establishing a DCA makes sense.
When the upward crossover of the STH/LTH cost basis occurs, it then confirms the start of a bull market phase. This signal can notably serve as an end point for DCA.
Beyond being a simple signal, it reflects Bitcoin's cyclicality, which plays out through the behaviors and choices of investors acting the same way across cycles.
The arrival of institutional players doesn't seem to have changed the Bitcoiner population much, which hasn't brought about major changes to these behaviors.
This cycle is, for now, following the same pattern as previous ones, with STH buying the dip and gradually lowering their cost basis to the point of falling below that of "active" LTH cost basis.
The STH cost basis has thus dropped from $112,500 to $69,000.
Written by Darkfost
The End of the Bear Market Is Coming Into View
The end of the bear market is approaching.
The bear market has now been in full swing for nine months, taking a toll on both STH and LTH alike.
As a reminder, STH refers to BTC holders <6 months, while LTH refers to holders >6 months.
In this chart, supply held for more than 7 years has been excluded from the LTH cost basis in order to better reflect the portion of supply that is economically active and held by LTH.
The end-of-bear-market signal has just flashed. This signal is defined by the downward crossover of the STH/LTH cost basis (with a 3-day confirmation window to validate the signal).
This doesn't mean the bear market ends the moment the signal fires or the bottom is in, but it indicates we are entering its final phase, a period during which establishing a DCA makes sense.
When the upward crossover of the STH/LTH cost basis occurs, it then confirms the start of a bull market phase. This signal can notably serve as an end point for DCA.
Beyond being a simple signal, it reflects Bitcoin's cyclicality, which plays out through the behaviors and choices of investors acting the same way across cycles.
The arrival of institutional players doesn't seem to have changed the Bitcoiner population much, which hasn't brought about major changes to these behaviors.
This cycle is, for now, following the same pattern as previous ones, with STH buying the dip and gradually lowering their cost basis to the point of falling below that of "active" LTH cost basis.
The STH cost basis has thus dropped from $112,500 to $69,000.
Written by Darkfost
The bear market has now been in full swing for nine months, taking a toll on both STH and LTH alike.
As a reminder, STH refers to BTC holders <6 months, while LTH refers to holders >6 months.
In this chart, supply held for more than 7 years has been excluded from the LTH cost basis in order to better reflect the portion of supply that is economically active and held by LTH.
The end-of-bear-market signal has just flashed. This signal is defined by the downward crossover of the STH/LTH cost basis (with a 3-day confirmation window to validate the signal).
This doesn't mean the bear market ends the moment the signal fires or the bottom is in, but it indicates we are entering its final phase, a period during which establishing a DCA makes sense.
When the upward crossover of the STH/LTH cost basis occurs, it then confirms the start of a bull market phase. This signal can notably serve as an end point for DCA.
Beyond being a simple signal, it reflects Bitcoin's cyclicality, which plays out through the behaviors and choices of investors acting the same way across cycles.
The arrival of institutional players doesn't seem to have changed the Bitcoiner population much, which hasn't brought about major changes to these behaviors.
This cycle is, for now, following the same pattern as previous ones, with STH buying the dip and gradually lowering their cost basis to the point of falling below that of "active" LTH cost basis.
The STH cost basis has thus dropped from $112,500 to $69,000.
Written by Darkfost
1
186
Article
Bitcoin’s Supply-Side Restructuring: Miner Stress and Veteran DistributionObservation
Recent on-chain data highlights a profound structural shift originating from the network’s foundational layers. Over the past week, metrics tracking miner shutdowns surged by an extraordinary 2,150% compared to the 90-day baseline. This operational stress is directly translating into supply pressure, as miner-to-Binance flows increased by over 470%. Simultaneously, we are observing a significant awakening of ancient supply; the movement of coins aged 7 to 10 years spiked by 374%, accompanied by a sharp rise in Coin Days Destroyed (CDD).
Context
This combination of metrics suggests that the market is undergoing a classic post-halving supply-side restructuring. As block rewards decrease and mining economics tighten, less efficient miners are forced to shut down operations and liquidate treasury reserves (evidenced by negative daily miner netflows) to cover operational costs. Concurrently, the movement of 7-to-10-year-old coins indicates that veteran market participants from previous cycles are choosing this choppy
62k–64k range to distribute portions of their holdings, securing liquidity during periods of macro uncertainty.
Comparison
Unlike speculative sell-offs driven by leveraged retail traders or short-term panic, the current environment is defined by fundamental, organic distribution. What is particularly noteworthy is the market’s absorption capacity; despite extreme miner offloading and the awakening of ancient coins—forces that traditionally exert severe downward pressure—Bitcoin’s price has maintained a relatively stable range, suggesting that underlying passive demand is quietly absorbing this foundational supply.
Potential Outcome
A market environment where extreme miner capitulation overlaps with long-term holder distribution creates conditions that historically preceded the final phases of post-halving consolidations. If the broader market can continue to absorb this structural supply without breaking critical macro supports, it may he
Written by CryptoOnchain
Bitcoin’s Supply-Side Restructuring: Miner Stress and Veteran Distribution
Observation
Recent on-chain data highlights a profound structural shift originating from the network’s foundational layers. Over the past week, metrics tracking miner shutdowns surged by an extraordinary 2,150% compared to the 90-day baseline. This operational stress is directly translating into supply pressure, as miner-to-Binance flows increased by over 470%. Simultaneously, we are observing a significant awakening of ancient supply; the movement of coins aged 7 to 10 years spiked by 374%, accompanied by a sharp rise in Coin Days Destroyed (CDD).
Context
This combination of metrics suggests that the market is undergoing a classic post-halving supply-side restructuring. As block rewards decrease and mining economics tighten, less efficient miners are forced to shut down operations and liquidate treasury reserves (evidenced by negative daily miner netflows) to cover operational costs. Concurrently, the movement of 7-to-10-year-old coins indicates that veteran market participants from previous cycles are choosing this choppy
62k–64k range to distribute portions of their holdings, securing liquidity during periods of macro uncertainty.
Comparison
Unlike speculative sell-offs driven by leveraged retail traders or short-term panic, the current environment is defined by fundamental, organic distribution. What is particularly noteworthy is the market’s absorption capacity; despite extreme miner offloading and the awakening of ancient coins—forces that traditionally exert severe downward pressure—Bitcoin’s price has maintained a relatively stable range, suggesting that underlying passive demand is quietly absorbing this foundational supply.
Potential Outcome
A market environment where extreme miner capitulation overlaps with long-term holder distribution creates conditions that historically preceded the final phases of post-halving consolidations. If the broader market can continue to absorb this structural supply without breaking critical macro supports, it may he
Written by CryptoOnchain
Recent on-chain data highlights a profound structural shift originating from the network’s foundational layers. Over the past week, metrics tracking miner shutdowns surged by an extraordinary 2,150% compared to the 90-day baseline. This operational stress is directly translating into supply pressure, as miner-to-Binance flows increased by over 470%. Simultaneously, we are observing a significant awakening of ancient supply; the movement of coins aged 7 to 10 years spiked by 374%, accompanied by a sharp rise in Coin Days Destroyed (CDD).
Context
This combination of metrics suggests that the market is undergoing a classic post-halving supply-side restructuring. As block rewards decrease and mining economics tighten, less efficient miners are forced to shut down operations and liquidate treasury reserves (evidenced by negative daily miner netflows) to cover operational costs. Concurrently, the movement of 7-to-10-year-old coins indicates that veteran market participants from previous cycles are choosing this choppy
62k–64k range to distribute portions of their holdings, securing liquidity during periods of macro uncertainty.
Comparison
Unlike speculative sell-offs driven by leveraged retail traders or short-term panic, the current environment is defined by fundamental, organic distribution. What is particularly noteworthy is the market’s absorption capacity; despite extreme miner offloading and the awakening of ancient coins—forces that traditionally exert severe downward pressure—Bitcoin’s price has maintained a relatively stable range, suggesting that underlying passive demand is quietly absorbing this foundational supply.
Potential Outcome
A market environment where extreme miner capitulation overlaps with long-term holder distribution creates conditions that historically preceded the final phases of post-halving consolidations. If the broader market can continue to absorb this structural supply without breaking critical macro supports, it may he
Written by CryptoOnchain
103
Article
Bitcoiners’ Pain ↓• Jun 4, 2026. BTC: $63K. On the 1M BTC Renko brick-value chart, Supply in Loss closed at 10M BTC.
• This level of on-chain pain is rarely observed and suggests oversold conditions.
• Data source: CryptoQuant.
Written by Facundo Fama
Bitcoiners’ Pain ↓
• Jun 4, 2026. BTC: $63K. On the 1M BTC Renko brick-value chart, Supply in Loss closed at 10M BTC.
• This level of on-chain pain is rarely observed and suggests oversold conditions.
• Data source: CryptoQuant.
Written by Facundo Fama
• This level of on-chain pain is rarely observed and suggests oversold conditions.
• Data source: CryptoQuant.
Written by Facundo Fama
2
123
Article
Ethereum's Selling Risk PersistsAlthough Ethereum whales remain in profit, their profitability is gradually declining. As long as the Whale NUPL stays above zero, it indicates that a significant portion of large investors still holds unrealized gains. However, NUPL has not reached the extreme levels seen during previous market peaks, suggesting that whales are not yet in an overheated profit zone. This implies that they have not reached the psychological threshold that typically triggers aggressive profit taking.
Meanwhile, the amount of ETH being transferred to Binance remains elevated. Since late 2024, deposits have increased significantly and continue to stay at high levels, indicating that a large volume of ETH has been moved into the Binance ecosystem. While this does not automatically signal selling, it does increase the amount of liquid ETH readily available for trading, keeping potential selling pressure elevated.
At the same time, stablecoin whales have accumulated substantial capital over the past two years. This suggests that major investors maintain significant purchasing power, holding not only large ETH positions but also considerable cash reserves in USDT and USDC.
The Realized Price continues to trend higher, indicating that the network's average cost basis is rising. This reflects stronger long term capital inflows compared with previous market cycles.
Taken together, these metrics suggest that Ethereum whales maintain high levels of liquidity and have the flexibility to shift market direction when necessary. The key factor for price will be the flow of capital between their large ETH holdings and their substantial stablecoin reserves. As things stand, the risk of selling pressure remains present.
Written by PelinayPA
Ethereum's Selling Risk Persists
Although Ethereum whales remain in profit, their profitability is gradually declining. As long as the Whale NUPL stays above zero, it indicates that a significant portion of large investors still holds unrealized gains. However, NUPL has not reached the extreme levels seen during previous market peaks, suggesting that whales are not yet in an overheated profit zone. This implies that they have not reached the psychological threshold that typically triggers aggressive profit taking.
Meanwhile, the amount of ETH being transferred to Binance remains elevated. Since late 2024, deposits have increased significantly and continue to stay at high levels, indicating that a large volume of ETH has been moved into the Binance ecosystem. While this does not automatically signal selling, it does increase the amount of liquid ETH readily available for trading, keeping potential selling pressure elevated.
At the same time, stablecoin whales have accumulated substantial capital over the past two years. This suggests that major investors maintain significant purchasing power, holding not only large ETH positions but also considerable cash reserves in USDT and USDC.
The Realized Price continues to trend higher, indicating that the network's average cost basis is rising. This reflects stronger long term capital inflows compared with previous market cycles.
Taken together, these metrics suggest that Ethereum whales maintain high levels of liquidity and have the flexibility to shift market direction when necessary. The key factor for price will be the flow of capital between their large ETH holdings and their substantial stablecoin reserves. As things stand, the risk of selling pressure remains present.
Written by PelinayPA
Meanwhile, the amount of ETH being transferred to Binance remains elevated. Since late 2024, deposits have increased significantly and continue to stay at high levels, indicating that a large volume of ETH has been moved into the Binance ecosystem. While this does not automatically signal selling, it does increase the amount of liquid ETH readily available for trading, keeping potential selling pressure elevated.
At the same time, stablecoin whales have accumulated substantial capital over the past two years. This suggests that major investors maintain significant purchasing power, holding not only large ETH positions but also considerable cash reserves in USDT and USDC.
The Realized Price continues to trend higher, indicating that the network's average cost basis is rising. This reflects stronger long term capital inflows compared with previous market cycles.
Taken together, these metrics suggest that Ethereum whales maintain high levels of liquidity and have the flexibility to shift market direction when necessary. The key factor for price will be the flow of capital between their large ETH holdings and their substantial stablecoin reserves. As things stand, the risk of selling pressure remains present.
Written by PelinayPA
1
211
Article
Deleveraging Returns for XRP, Echoing Its 2024 +790% Rally SetupXRP is currently going through a new phase of deleveraging on Binance. This is visible through the evolution of the estimated leverage ratio (ELR), which measures the weight of leveraged futures positions relative to the evolution of the asset’s reserves on the platform.
Today, XRP’s ELR on Binance stands at 0.16, one of the lowest levels recorded since November 2024. It’s now closing in on the April 2026 low (0.15), as XRP simultaneously posts a correction of around 70%.
This drop in the ELR is mainly driven by a reduction in futures positions, partly liquidated as a result of the correction, which mechanically triggers a decline in open interest.
This leverage cleanup is an essential step in the ongoing correction: excess accumulated leverage weakens the market’s foundation and makes price action more unpredictable.
A similar scenario already played out in 2024, while XRP traded around $0.40 and consolidated, the ELR approached 0.05.
That cleanup was followed by a rally of more than 790%, itself accompanied by a return of leverage that pushed the ELR back up.
This doesn’t mean the same scenario will repeat, but understanding this deleveraging cycle matters for positioning accordingly.
Written by Darkfost
Deleveraging Returns for XRP, Echoing Its 2024 +790% Rally Setup
XRP is currently going through a new phase of deleveraging on Binance. This is visible through the evolution of the estimated leverage ratio (ELR), which measures the weight of leveraged futures positions relative to the evolution of the asset’s reserves on the platform.
Today, XRP’s ELR on Binance stands at 0.16, one of the lowest levels recorded since November 2024. It’s now closing in on the April 2026 low (0.15), as XRP simultaneously posts a correction of around 70%.
This drop in the ELR is mainly driven by a reduction in futures positions, partly liquidated as a result of the correction, which mechanically triggers a decline in open interest.
This leverage cleanup is an essential step in the ongoing correction: excess accumulated leverage weakens the market’s foundation and makes price action more unpredictable.
A similar scenario already played out in 2024, while XRP traded around $0.40 and consolidated, the ELR approached 0.05.
That cleanup was followed by a rally of more than 790%, itself accompanied by a return of leverage that pushed the ELR back up.
This doesn’t mean the same scenario will repeat, but understanding this deleveraging cycle matters for positioning accordingly.
Written by Darkfost
Today, XRP’s ELR on Binance stands at 0.16, one of the lowest levels recorded since November 2024. It’s now closing in on the April 2026 low (0.15), as XRP simultaneously posts a correction of around 70%.
This drop in the ELR is mainly driven by a reduction in futures positions, partly liquidated as a result of the correction, which mechanically triggers a decline in open interest.
This leverage cleanup is an essential step in the ongoing correction: excess accumulated leverage weakens the market’s foundation and makes price action more unpredictable.
A similar scenario already played out in 2024, while XRP traded around $0.40 and consolidated, the ELR approached 0.05.
That cleanup was followed by a rally of more than 790%, itself accompanied by a return of leverage that pushed the ELR back up.
This doesn’t mean the same scenario will repeat, but understanding this deleveraging cycle matters for positioning accordingly.
Written by Darkfost
1
152
Article
XRP Binance Withdrawals Hit 54.5% As Deposit Share Falls to Lowest Level Since July 2024XRP Binance Withdrawal Transaction Share Hits Highest Since July 2024, Echoing Setup Before 66% Rally
XRP’s transaction structure has shifted sharply toward withdrawals, with Binance recording its strongest imbalance in at least two years.
On July 17, Binance’s share of XRP withdrawal transactions rose to 54.5%, the highest level since July 2024 and above the previous peak of 53.2% recorded on June 20, 2025. At the same time, Binance deposit transactions fell to 45.4%, below the previous low of 46.7% from the same June 2025 period.
The gap between Binance withdrawal and deposit transactions has consequently widened to 9.1 percentage points, compared with 6.5 points on June 20, 2025. This makes the current imbalance approximately 40% wider than the previous historical comparison.
The broader exchange market is displaying a similar pattern.
All-CEX withdrawal transactions reached 53.01%, nearly matching the 53.09% recorded on June 20, 2025, while the all-CEX deposit share returned to approximately 46.9%.
Binance’s withdrawal share is currently about 1.49 percentage points higher than the all-exchange average, while its 9.1-point withdrawal-deposit gap is nearly 49% wider than the approximately 6.1-point gap across all centralized exchanges.
The historical comparison is notable.
After similar transaction levels appeared on June 20, 2025, XRP rose from approximately $2.11 to $3.50 by July 21, representing a gain of nearly 66% in one month.
XRP is currently trading near $1.09, roughly 48% below its June 2025 comparison price and almost 69% below the subsequent $3.50 peak. However, transaction percentages measure the number of deposit and withdrawal transactions—not transferred volume or net exchange flows—so the data should be viewed as a change in transaction composition rather than direct evidence of capital outflows or a guaranteed price outcome.
Written by Amr Taha
XRP Binance Withdrawals Hit 54.5% As Deposit Share Falls to Lowest Level Since July 2024
XRP Binance Withdrawal Transaction Share Hits Highest Since July 2024, Echoing Setup Before 66% Rally
XRP’s transaction structure has shifted sharply toward withdrawals, with Binance recording its strongest imbalance in at least two years.
On July 17, Binance’s share of XRP withdrawal transactions rose to 54.5%, the highest level since July 2024 and above the previous peak of 53.2% recorded on June 20, 2025. At the same time, Binance deposit transactions fell to 45.4%, below the previous low of 46.7% from the same June 2025 period.
The gap between Binance withdrawal and deposit transactions has consequently widened to 9.1 percentage points, compared with 6.5 points on June 20, 2025. This makes the current imbalance approximately 40% wider than the previous historical comparison.
The broader exchange market is displaying a similar pattern.
All-CEX withdrawal transactions reached 53.01%, nearly matching the 53.09% recorded on June 20, 2025, while the all-CEX deposit share returned to approximately 46.9%.
Binance’s withdrawal share is currently about 1.49 percentage points higher than the all-exchange average, while its 9.1-point withdrawal-deposit gap is nearly 49% wider than the approximately 6.1-point gap across all centralized exchanges.
The historical comparison is notable.
After similar transaction levels appeared on June 20, 2025, XRP rose from approximately $2.11 to $3.50 by July 21, representing a gain of nearly 66% in one month.
XRP is currently trading near $1.09, roughly 48% below its June 2025 comparison price and almost 69% below the subsequent $3.50 peak. However, transaction percentages measure the number of deposit and withdrawal transactions—not transferred volume or net exchange flows—so the data should be viewed as a change in transaction composition rather than direct evidence of capital outflows or a guaranteed price outcome.
Written by Amr Taha
XRP’s transaction structure has shifted sharply toward withdrawals, with Binance recording its strongest imbalance in at least two years.
On July 17, Binance’s share of XRP withdrawal transactions rose to 54.5%, the highest level since July 2024 and above the previous peak of 53.2% recorded on June 20, 2025. At the same time, Binance deposit transactions fell to 45.4%, below the previous low of 46.7% from the same June 2025 period.
The gap between Binance withdrawal and deposit transactions has consequently widened to 9.1 percentage points, compared with 6.5 points on June 20, 2025. This makes the current imbalance approximately 40% wider than the previous historical comparison.
The broader exchange market is displaying a similar pattern.
All-CEX withdrawal transactions reached 53.01%, nearly matching the 53.09% recorded on June 20, 2025, while the all-CEX deposit share returned to approximately 46.9%.
Binance’s withdrawal share is currently about 1.49 percentage points higher than the all-exchange average, while its 9.1-point withdrawal-deposit gap is nearly 49% wider than the approximately 6.1-point gap across all centralized exchanges.
The historical comparison is notable.
After similar transaction levels appeared on June 20, 2025, XRP rose from approximately $2.11 to $3.50 by July 21, representing a gain of nearly 66% in one month.
XRP is currently trading near $1.09, roughly 48% below its June 2025 comparison price and almost 69% below the subsequent $3.50 peak. However, transaction percentages measure the number of deposit and withdrawal transactions—not transferred volume or net exchange flows—so the data should be viewed as a change in transaction composition rather than direct evidence of capital outflows or a guaranteed price outcome.
Written by Amr Taha
125
Article
Binance XRP Whale Outflow Falls to Its Lowest Level in More Than Two MonthsData from the XRP Binance Whale Outflow (SUM 30D) indicator shows that total XRP whale outflows from the Binance platform over the past 30 days have declined to approximately 885.1 million XRP, marking the lowest level in more than two months. This decline reflects a significant slowdown in the transfer of large holdings from the exchange to external wallets, following a period of elevated withdrawal activity.
High outflows are generally viewed as a sign that large investors are shifting toward long-term holding, while lower outflows may indicate reduced withdrawal activity or an overall decline in whale participation. However, this metric should not be interpreted in isolation; it should be analyzed alongside other indicators, such as deposit flows, trading volume, liquidity, and price action, to provide a more comprehensive assessment.
This decline coincides with XRP continuing to trade within a relatively narrow price range, suggesting a cautious, wait-and-see approach among large investors. The stabilization of outflows at these levels may also reflect a reduced willingness to move assets off the exchange, whether due to expectations of new market catalysts or a broader slowdown in investment activity compared with recent months. While lower outflows are not inherently a bullish or bearish signal, they do indicate reduced movement of large holdings, which may ultimately be reflected in market liquidity and overall network activity.
Written by Arab Chain
Binance XRP Whale Outflow Falls to Its Lowest Level in More Than Two Months
Data from the XRP Binance Whale Outflow (SUM 30D) indicator shows that total XRP whale outflows from the Binance platform over the past 30 days have declined to approximately 885.1 million XRP, marking the lowest level in more than two months. This decline reflects a significant slowdown in the transfer of large holdings from the exchange to external wallets, following a period of elevated withdrawal activity.
High outflows are generally viewed as a sign that large investors are shifting toward long-term holding, while lower outflows may indicate reduced withdrawal activity or an overall decline in whale participation. However, this metric should not be interpreted in isolation; it should be analyzed alongside other indicators, such as deposit flows, trading volume, liquidity, and price action, to provide a more comprehensive assessment.
This decline coincides with XRP continuing to trade within a relatively narrow price range, suggesting a cautious, wait-and-see approach among large investors. The stabilization of outflows at these levels may also reflect a reduced willingness to move assets off the exchange, whether due to expectations of new market catalysts or a broader slowdown in investment activity compared with recent months. While lower outflows are not inherently a bullish or bearish signal, they do indicate reduced movement of large holdings, which may ultimately be reflected in market liquidity and overall network activity.
Written by Arab Chain
High outflows are generally viewed as a sign that large investors are shifting toward long-term holding, while lower outflows may indicate reduced withdrawal activity or an overall decline in whale participation. However, this metric should not be interpreted in isolation; it should be analyzed alongside other indicators, such as deposit flows, trading volume, liquidity, and price action, to provide a more comprehensive assessment.
This decline coincides with XRP continuing to trade within a relatively narrow price range, suggesting a cautious, wait-and-see approach among large investors. The stabilization of outflows at these levels may also reflect a reduced willingness to move assets off the exchange, whether due to expectations of new market catalysts or a broader slowdown in investment activity compared with recent months. While lower outflows are not inherently a bullish or bearish signal, they do indicate reduced movement of large holdings, which may ultimately be reflected in market liquidity and overall network activity.
Written by Arab Chain
187
Article
Bitcoin: Mature Blockchain ↓• Bitcoin is the first mature blockchain.
• U.S. Congress: H.R. 3633 would define mature blockchain as "a blockchain system, together with its related digital commodity, that is not controlled by any person or group of persons under common control."
• Data source: CryptoQuant.
Written by Facundo Fama
Bitcoin: Mature Blockchain ↓
• Bitcoin is the first mature blockchain.
• U.S. Congress: H.R. 3633 would define mature blockchain as "a blockchain system, together with its related digital commodity, that is not controlled by any person or group of persons under common control."
• Data source: CryptoQuant.
Written by Facundo Fama
• U.S. Congress: H.R. 3633 would define mature blockchain as "a blockchain system, together with its related digital commodity, that is not controlled by any person or group of persons under common control."
• Data source: CryptoQuant.
Written by Facundo Fama
1
118
Article
Bitcoin: Mature Blockchain ↓• Bitcoin is the first mature blockchain.
• Mature blockchain: A blockchain system, together with its related digital commodity, that is not controlled by any person or group of persons under common control.
Written by Facundo Fama
Bitcoin: Mature Blockchain ↓
• Bitcoin is the first mature blockchain.
• Mature blockchain: A blockchain system, together with its related digital commodity, that is not controlled by any person or group of persons under common control.
Written by Facundo Fama
• Mature blockchain: A blockchain system, together with its related digital commodity, that is not controlled by any person or group of persons under common control.
Written by Facundo Fama
131
Article
Japan's Crypto Market Enters a New Era: Financial Reform Opens the Door to Bitcoin ETFsOn July 15, 2026, Japan passed major amendments to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA), marking a turning point for the country's crypto market.
The reform does not classify Bitcoin or Ethereum as securities. Instead, it recognizes crypto assets as investment products and introduces investor protection, disclosure requirements, and market surveillance similar to those in traditional financial markets.
The goal is to create a regulatory framework that encourages participation from banks, securities firms, asset managers, and institutional investors while strengthening investor protection.
The legislation will be implemented in stages. The enforcement date and detailed rules will be announced over the coming months, followed by related tax reforms.
One of the most important implications is the increasing possibility of a Japanese spot Bitcoin ETF. Although this law does not approve ETFs, government documents indicate that investment trust regulations are also being prepared, suggesting a clear roadmap toward future ETF products.
The U.S. provides a useful example. Since spot Bitcoin ETFs launched in 2024, ETF holdings have grown to more than one million BTC (excluding GBTC), driven by strong institutional demand. This has fundamentally changed the market by bringing long-term capital into Bitcoin.
If Japan follows a similar path, institutional participation could expand significantly, creating new demand for digital assets.
At xWIN, we believe this reform is more than a regulatory update. It represents the first step toward a regulated digital capital market in Japan, supporting future growth in Bitcoin ETFs, stablecoins, tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), and on-chain finance.
Written by XWIN Japan
Japan's Crypto Market Enters a New Era: Financial Reform Opens the Door to Bitcoin ETFs
On July 15, 2026, Japan passed major amendments to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA), marking a turning point for the country's crypto market.
The reform does not classify Bitcoin or Ethereum as securities. Instead, it recognizes crypto assets as investment products and introduces investor protection, disclosure requirements, and market surveillance similar to those in traditional financial markets.
The goal is to create a regulatory framework that encourages participation from banks, securities firms, asset managers, and institutional investors while strengthening investor protection.
The legislation will be implemented in stages. The enforcement date and detailed rules will be announced over the coming months, followed by related tax reforms.
One of the most important implications is the increasing possibility of a Japanese spot Bitcoin ETF. Although this law does not approve ETFs, government documents indicate that investment trust regulations are also being prepared, suggesting a clear roadmap toward future ETF products.
The U.S. provides a useful example. Since spot Bitcoin ETFs launched in 2024, ETF holdings have grown to more than one million BTC (excluding GBTC), driven by strong institutional demand. This has fundamentally changed the market by bringing long-term capital into Bitcoin.
If Japan follows a similar path, institutional participation could expand significantly, creating new demand for digital assets.
At xWIN, we believe this reform is more than a regulatory update. It represents the first step toward a regulated digital capital market in Japan, supporting future growth in Bitcoin ETFs, stablecoins, tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), and on-chain finance.
Written by XWIN Japan
The reform does not classify Bitcoin or Ethereum as securities. Instead, it recognizes crypto assets as investment products and introduces investor protection, disclosure requirements, and market surveillance similar to those in traditional financial markets.
The goal is to create a regulatory framework that encourages participation from banks, securities firms, asset managers, and institutional investors while strengthening investor protection.
The legislation will be implemented in stages. The enforcement date and detailed rules will be announced over the coming months, followed by related tax reforms.
One of the most important implications is the increasing possibility of a Japanese spot Bitcoin ETF. Although this law does not approve ETFs, government documents indicate that investment trust regulations are also being prepared, suggesting a clear roadmap toward future ETF products.
The U.S. provides a useful example. Since spot Bitcoin ETFs launched in 2024, ETF holdings have grown to more than one million BTC (excluding GBTC), driven by strong institutional demand. This has fundamentally changed the market by bringing long-term capital into Bitcoin.
If Japan follows a similar path, institutional participation could expand significantly, creating new demand for digital assets.
At xWIN, we believe this reform is more than a regulatory update. It represents the first step toward a regulated digital capital market in Japan, supporting future growth in Bitcoin ETFs, stablecoins, tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), and on-chain finance.
Written by XWIN Japan
1
1.2k
Article
MKR’s Deflationary Awakening: Protocol Burns Accelerate Amidst Exchange DormancyObservation
Recent on-chain data for MKR highlights a distinct structural divergence between protocol-level mechanics and centralized exchange activity. Over the past week, the network witnessed a 460% surge in its token burn rate, highlighted by a notable 111 MKR burned on July 10 alone. Concurrently, total network transactions increased by 24% against the 7-day baseline, pushing token velocity to a 6-month high. Paradoxically, this surge in on-chain vitality is occurring while Binance exchange flows remain entirely dormant; both inflows and outflows have essentially flatlined near zero.
Context
This specific dynamic suggests that MKR’s recent price momentum (rebounding from $1,225 to over $1,500) is being driven strictly by organic on-chain yield mechanics rather than centralized retail speculation. As MakerDAO transitions through its “Sky” rebranding and updates its governance and yield modules, the protocol is actively generating revenue, which directly translates into automated buybacks and burns. The complete lack of Binance flow indicates that holders prefer to keep assets on-chain to participate in DeFi ecosystems rather than moving them to CEXs to sell.
Comparison
Comparing the rising transaction counts (surpassing 1,700 daily transactions) with the stagnant exchange balances illustrates a healthy deflationary expansion. Unlike typical speculative rallies where rising prices immediately attract heavy exchange inflows for profit-taking, MKR’s supply is actively contracting (dropping from 90,174 to 90,026 tokens) without triggering centralized sell pressure.
Potential Outcome
A market environment where supply steadily contracts via protocol burns, paired with a lack of exchange-side selling pressure, creates conditions that traditionally support gradual upward price drift. If the ongoing rebranding efforts continue to stimulate on-chain cash flows, this deflationary pressure may provide a robust structural floor for MKR, assuming macroeconomic stabilit
Written by CryptoOnchain
MKR’s Deflationary Awakening: Protocol Burns Accelerate Amidst Exchange Dormancy
Observation
Recent on-chain data for MKR highlights a distinct structural divergence between protocol-level mechanics and centralized exchange activity. Over the past week, the network witnessed a 460% surge in its token burn rate, highlighted by a notable 111 MKR burned on July 10 alone. Concurrently, total network transactions increased by 24% against the 7-day baseline, pushing token velocity to a 6-month high. Paradoxically, this surge in on-chain vitality is occurring while Binance exchange flows remain entirely dormant; both inflows and outflows have essentially flatlined near zero.
Context
This specific dynamic suggests that MKR’s recent price momentum (rebounding from $1,225 to over $1,500) is being driven strictly by organic on-chain yield mechanics rather than centralized retail speculation. As MakerDAO transitions through its “Sky” rebranding and updates its governance and yield modules, the protocol is actively generating revenue, which directly translates into automated buybacks and burns. The complete lack of Binance flow indicates that holders prefer to keep assets on-chain to participate in DeFi ecosystems rather than moving them to CEXs to sell.
Comparison
Comparing the rising transaction counts (surpassing 1,700 daily transactions) with the stagnant exchange balances illustrates a healthy deflationary expansion. Unlike typical speculative rallies where rising prices immediately attract heavy exchange inflows for profit-taking, MKR’s supply is actively contracting (dropping from 90,174 to 90,026 tokens) without triggering centralized sell pressure.
Potential Outcome
A market environment where supply steadily contracts via protocol burns, paired with a lack of exchange-side selling pressure, creates conditions that traditionally support gradual upward price drift. If the ongoing rebranding efforts continue to stimulate on-chain cash flows, this deflationary pressure may provide a robust structural floor for MKR, assuming macroeconomic stabilit
Written by CryptoOnchain
Recent on-chain data for MKR highlights a distinct structural divergence between protocol-level mechanics and centralized exchange activity. Over the past week, the network witnessed a 460% surge in its token burn rate, highlighted by a notable 111 MKR burned on July 10 alone. Concurrently, total network transactions increased by 24% against the 7-day baseline, pushing token velocity to a 6-month high. Paradoxically, this surge in on-chain vitality is occurring while Binance exchange flows remain entirely dormant; both inflows and outflows have essentially flatlined near zero.
Context
This specific dynamic suggests that MKR’s recent price momentum (rebounding from $1,225 to over $1,500) is being driven strictly by organic on-chain yield mechanics rather than centralized retail speculation. As MakerDAO transitions through its “Sky” rebranding and updates its governance and yield modules, the protocol is actively generating revenue, which directly translates into automated buybacks and burns. The complete lack of Binance flow indicates that holders prefer to keep assets on-chain to participate in DeFi ecosystems rather than moving them to CEXs to sell.
Comparison
Comparing the rising transaction counts (surpassing 1,700 daily transactions) with the stagnant exchange balances illustrates a healthy deflationary expansion. Unlike typical speculative rallies where rising prices immediately attract heavy exchange inflows for profit-taking, MKR’s supply is actively contracting (dropping from 90,174 to 90,026 tokens) without triggering centralized sell pressure.
Potential Outcome
A market environment where supply steadily contracts via protocol burns, paired with a lack of exchange-side selling pressure, creates conditions that traditionally support gradual upward price drift. If the ongoing rebranding efforts continue to stimulate on-chain cash flows, this deflationary pressure may provide a robust structural floor for MKR, assuming macroeconomic stabilit
Written by CryptoOnchain
25
Article
MKR’s Deflationary Awakening: Protocol Burns Accelerate Amidst Exchange DormancyObservation
Recent on-chain data for MKR highlights a distinct structural divergence between protocol-level mechanics and centralized exchange activity. Over the past week, the network witnessed a 460% surge in its token burn rate, highlighted by a notable 111 MKR burned on July 10 alone. Concurrently, total network transactions increased by 24% against the 7-day baseline, pushing token velocity to a 6-month high. Paradoxically, this surge in on-chain vitality is occurring while Binance exchange flows remain entirely dormant; both inflows and outflows have essentially flatlined near zero.
Context
This specific dynamic suggests that MKR’s recent price momentum (rebounding from $1,225 to over $1,500) is being driven strictly by organic on-chain yield mechanics rather than centralized retail speculation. As MakerDAO transitions through its “Sky” rebranding and updates its governance and yield modules, the protocol is actively generating revenue, which directly translates into automated buybacks and burns. The complete lack of Binance flow indicates that holders prefer to keep assets on-chain to participate in DeFi ecosystems rather than moving them to CEXs to sell.
Comparison
Comparing the rising transaction counts (surpassing 1,700 daily transactions) with the stagnant exchange balances illustrates a healthy deflationary expansion. Unlike typical speculative rallies where rising prices immediately attract heavy exchange inflows for profit-taking, MKR’s supply is actively contracting (dropping from 90,174 to 90,026 tokens) without triggering centralized sell pressure.
Potential Outcome
A market environment where supply steadily contracts via protocol burns, paired with a lack of exchange-side selling pressure, creates conditions that traditionally support gradual upward price drift. If the ongoing rebranding efforts continue to stimulate on-chain cash flows, this deflationary pressure may provide a robust structural floor for MKR, assuming macroeconomic stabilit
Written by CryptoOnchain
MKR’s Deflationary Awakening: Protocol Burns Accelerate Amidst Exchange Dormancy
Observation
Recent on-chain data for MKR highlights a distinct structural divergence between protocol-level mechanics and centralized exchange activity. Over the past week, the network witnessed a 460% surge in its token burn rate, highlighted by a notable 111 MKR burned on July 10 alone. Concurrently, total network transactions increased by 24% against the 7-day baseline, pushing token velocity to a 6-month high. Paradoxically, this surge in on-chain vitality is occurring while Binance exchange flows remain entirely dormant; both inflows and outflows have essentially flatlined near zero.
Context
This specific dynamic suggests that MKR’s recent price momentum (rebounding from $1,225 to over $1,500) is being driven strictly by organic on-chain yield mechanics rather than centralized retail speculation. As MakerDAO transitions through its “Sky” rebranding and updates its governance and yield modules, the protocol is actively generating revenue, which directly translates into automated buybacks and burns. The complete lack of Binance flow indicates that holders prefer to keep assets on-chain to participate in DeFi ecosystems rather than moving them to CEXs to sell.
Comparison
Comparing the rising transaction counts (surpassing 1,700 daily transactions) with the stagnant exchange balances illustrates a healthy deflationary expansion. Unlike typical speculative rallies where rising prices immediately attract heavy exchange inflows for profit-taking, MKR’s supply is actively contracting (dropping from 90,174 to 90,026 tokens) without triggering centralized sell pressure.
Potential Outcome
A market environment where supply steadily contracts via protocol burns, paired with a lack of exchange-side selling pressure, creates conditions that traditionally support gradual upward price drift. If the ongoing rebranding efforts continue to stimulate on-chain cash flows, this deflationary pressure may provide a robust structural floor for MKR, assuming macroeconomic stabilit
Written by CryptoOnchain
Recent on-chain data for MKR highlights a distinct structural divergence between protocol-level mechanics and centralized exchange activity. Over the past week, the network witnessed a 460% surge in its token burn rate, highlighted by a notable 111 MKR burned on July 10 alone. Concurrently, total network transactions increased by 24% against the 7-day baseline, pushing token velocity to a 6-month high. Paradoxically, this surge in on-chain vitality is occurring while Binance exchange flows remain entirely dormant; both inflows and outflows have essentially flatlined near zero.
Context
This specific dynamic suggests that MKR’s recent price momentum (rebounding from $1,225 to over $1,500) is being driven strictly by organic on-chain yield mechanics rather than centralized retail speculation. As MakerDAO transitions through its “Sky” rebranding and updates its governance and yield modules, the protocol is actively generating revenue, which directly translates into automated buybacks and burns. The complete lack of Binance flow indicates that holders prefer to keep assets on-chain to participate in DeFi ecosystems rather than moving them to CEXs to sell.
Comparison
Comparing the rising transaction counts (surpassing 1,700 daily transactions) with the stagnant exchange balances illustrates a healthy deflationary expansion. Unlike typical speculative rallies where rising prices immediately attract heavy exchange inflows for profit-taking, MKR’s supply is actively contracting (dropping from 90,174 to 90,026 tokens) without triggering centralized sell pressure.
Potential Outcome
A market environment where supply steadily contracts via protocol burns, paired with a lack of exchange-side selling pressure, creates conditions that traditionally support gradual upward price drift. If the ongoing rebranding efforts continue to stimulate on-chain cash flows, this deflationary pressure may provide a robust structural floor for MKR, assuming macroeconomic stabilit
Written by CryptoOnchain
23
Article
Stablecoin Network Rotation: the Billion-Dollar Migration From Ethereum to TronObservation
Recent on-chain data from Binance reveals a massive, coordinated structural rotation rather than a simple liquidity drain. Over the second week of July, we observed a near-perfect mirroring effect between Ethereum-based and Tron-based Tether (USDT). Specifically, on July 7, Binance recorded an $838M net outflow of USDT-ETH, which was immediately countered by a $797M net inflow of USDT-TRX. This synchronized swapping continued on July 9 (-$437M USDT-ETH vs. +$590M USDT-TRX) and July 10 (-$346M USDT-ETH vs. +$301M USDT-TRX), highlighting a multi-billion dollar network migration within the exchange.
Context
This precise offsetting of flows suggests an internal restructuring of liquidity, likely driven by user preference or exchange-level wallet management. USDT on Tron is predominantly favored for high-velocity, low-fee retail trading and cross-border transfers, whereas USDT on Ethereum is traditionally utilized by larger whales and smart contracts. The aggressive conversion of Ethereum reserves into Tron reserves implies that the market is preparing for an environment that requires rapid, cost-effective capital deployment.
Comparison
Unlike previous periods of true capital flight—where aggregate stablecoin reserves plummeted—the overall Binance stablecoin reserve (all_stable_reserve) has remained relatively stable at approximately $43B to $44B during this period. The macro purchasing power has not evaporated; rather, the underlying infrastructure housing this dry powder has shifted entirely toward the Tron network, corroborated by the recent spike in new USDT-TRX minting events.
Potential Outcome
A market structure where billions of dollars in stablecoin liquidity migrate to a low-fee network often precedes periods of heightened retail engagement and transaction velocity. If this newly positioned TRX-based liquidity begins to actively deploy into assets, it creates conditions that historically favor high-frequency, spot-driven price momentum.
Written by CryptoOnchain
Stablecoin Network Rotation: the Billion-Dollar Migration From Ethereum to Tron
Observation
Recent on-chain data from Binance reveals a massive, coordinated structural rotation rather than a simple liquidity drain. Over the second week of July, we observed a near-perfect mirroring effect between Ethereum-based and Tron-based Tether (USDT). Specifically, on July 7, Binance recorded an $838M net outflow of USDT-ETH, which was immediately countered by a $797M net inflow of USDT-TRX. This synchronized swapping continued on July 9 (-$437M USDT-ETH vs. +$590M USDT-TRX) and July 10 (-$346M USDT-ETH vs. +$301M USDT-TRX), highlighting a multi-billion dollar network migration within the exchange.
Context
This precise offsetting of flows suggests an internal restructuring of liquidity, likely driven by user preference or exchange-level wallet management. USDT on Tron is predominantly favored for high-velocity, low-fee retail trading and cross-border transfers, whereas USDT on Ethereum is traditionally utilized by larger whales and smart contracts. The aggressive conversion of Ethereum reserves into Tron reserves implies that the market is preparing for an environment that requires rapid, cost-effective capital deployment.
Comparison
Unlike previous periods of true capital flight—where aggregate stablecoin reserves plummeted—the overall Binance stablecoin reserve (all_stable_reserve) has remained relatively stable at approximately $43B to $44B during this period. The macro purchasing power has not evaporated; rather, the underlying infrastructure housing this dry powder has shifted entirely toward the Tron network, corroborated by the recent spike in new USDT-TRX minting events.
Potential Outcome
A market structure where billions of dollars in stablecoin liquidity migrate to a low-fee network often precedes periods of heightened retail engagement and transaction velocity. If this newly positioned TRX-based liquidity begins to actively deploy into assets, it creates conditions that historically favor high-frequency, spot-driven price momentum.
Written by CryptoOnchain
Recent on-chain data from Binance reveals a massive, coordinated structural rotation rather than a simple liquidity drain. Over the second week of July, we observed a near-perfect mirroring effect between Ethereum-based and Tron-based Tether (USDT). Specifically, on July 7, Binance recorded an $838M net outflow of USDT-ETH, which was immediately countered by a $797M net inflow of USDT-TRX. This synchronized swapping continued on July 9 (-$437M USDT-ETH vs. +$590M USDT-TRX) and July 10 (-$346M USDT-ETH vs. +$301M USDT-TRX), highlighting a multi-billion dollar network migration within the exchange.
Context
This precise offsetting of flows suggests an internal restructuring of liquidity, likely driven by user preference or exchange-level wallet management. USDT on Tron is predominantly favored for high-velocity, low-fee retail trading and cross-border transfers, whereas USDT on Ethereum is traditionally utilized by larger whales and smart contracts. The aggressive conversion of Ethereum reserves into Tron reserves implies that the market is preparing for an environment that requires rapid, cost-effective capital deployment.
Comparison
Unlike previous periods of true capital flight—where aggregate stablecoin reserves plummeted—the overall Binance stablecoin reserve (all_stable_reserve) has remained relatively stable at approximately $43B to $44B during this period. The macro purchasing power has not evaporated; rather, the underlying infrastructure housing this dry powder has shifted entirely toward the Tron network, corroborated by the recent spike in new USDT-TRX minting events.
Potential Outcome
A market structure where billions of dollars in stablecoin liquidity migrate to a low-fee network often precedes periods of heightened retail engagement and transaction velocity. If this newly positioned TRX-based liquidity begins to actively deploy into assets, it creates conditions that historically favor high-frequency, spot-driven price momentum.
Written by CryptoOnchain
1
110
Article
You Really Think the Bottom Is Already In?Then explain this.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs were one of the biggest drivers behind $BTC's rally over the past two years.
• 2024: relentless accumulation - over 500K BTC in net inflows
• 2025: still strong - peaking around 250K BTC
• 2026: roughly 120K BTC of cumulative net outflows
If ETF demand drove the rally up, how can you be bullish while that demand reversed completely?
Maybe the market is pricing in something else.
Maybe new capital replaces ETF flows.
But based on this data alone - this is a headwind, not a tailwind.
What's your bull case despite these flows? 👇
Written by IT Tech
You Really Think the Bottom Is Already In?
Then explain this.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs were one of the biggest drivers behind $BTC's rally over the past two years.
• 2024: relentless accumulation - over 500K BTC in net inflows
• 2025: still strong - peaking around 250K BTC
• 2026: roughly 120K BTC of cumulative net outflows
If ETF demand drove the rally up, how can you be bullish while that demand reversed completely?
Maybe the market is pricing in something else.
Maybe new capital replaces ETF flows.
But based on this data alone - this is a headwind, not a tailwind.
What's your bull case despite these flows? 👇
Written by IT Tech
Spot Bitcoin ETFs were one of the biggest drivers behind $BTC's rally over the past two years.
• 2024: relentless accumulation - over 500K BTC in net inflows
• 2025: still strong - peaking around 250K BTC
• 2026: roughly 120K BTC of cumulative net outflows
If ETF demand drove the rally up, how can you be bullish while that demand reversed completely?
Maybe the market is pricing in something else.
Maybe new capital replaces ETF flows.
But based on this data alone - this is a headwind, not a tailwind.
What's your bull case despite these flows? 👇
Written by IT Tech
134
Article
Bitcoin's Realized Cap Variance Just Hit Its Rarest Reading Since 2018 — Here's What the Data SaysBitcoin's realized cap variance model, the framework I use to time buy-only DCA allocations, just entered territory it has occupied for less than one in every sixteen trading days across sixteen years of on-chain history.
As of July 15, the standardized RCV reading sits at -2.35, roughly the bottom 6% of the dataset back to 2009. The market has sat inside my "Deep Value" zone for twenty straight days, and the framework has fired its highest-conviction signal, 3x Max Conviction, twice in the past two weeks, on July 2 and July 9.
To see why that matters, it helps to know what RCV measures. Instead of tracking price alone, it isolates the variance between realized cap and market cap relative to its own rolling history, capturing how stretched or compressed investor cost basis has become versus current valuation.
When that variance compresses into deeply negative z-score territory, the emotional premium built during rallies has largely been priced out. The metric doesn't read narrative, it reads the distribution of capital.
Bitcoin trades near $64,700, down 48% from October's all-time high of $124,700. Brutal on its face, but this framework has seen the pattern before. Every prior stretch where the model spent extended time below a -2.0 z-score, late 2018, mid-2022, early 2015, preceded forward twelve-month returns north of 75%. The most extreme reading in this dataset, -4.68 in November 2018, landed almost exactly on Bitcoin's cycle bottom near $3,792.
I'm not calling a bottom. The model never claims exact lows, and readings can compress further before reversing, as 2018 proved. What it shows is current positioning statistically resembles capitulation far more than a mid-cycle correction. Out of 229 signals since 2011, back-to-back Max Conviction firings this close together have historically marked maximum pain, not drawdown noise.
This is a framework built for discipline, not prediction. It tells you when data says accumulate, not where the bottom is.
Written by Crazzyblockk
Bitcoin's Realized Cap Variance Just Hit Its Rarest Reading Since 2018 — Here's What the Data Says
Bitcoin's realized cap variance model, the framework I use to time buy-only DCA allocations, just entered territory it has occupied for less than one in every sixteen trading days across sixteen years of on-chain history.
As of July 15, the standardized RCV reading sits at -2.35, roughly the bottom 6% of the dataset back to 2009. The market has sat inside my "Deep Value" zone for twenty straight days, and the framework has fired its highest-conviction signal, 3x Max Conviction, twice in the past two weeks, on July 2 and July 9.
To see why that matters, it helps to know what RCV measures. Instead of tracking price alone, it isolates the variance between realized cap and market cap relative to its own rolling history, capturing how stretched or compressed investor cost basis has become versus current valuation.
When that variance compresses into deeply negative z-score territory, the emotional premium built during rallies has largely been priced out. The metric doesn't read narrative, it reads the distribution of capital.
Bitcoin trades near $64,700, down 48% from October's all-time high of $124,700. Brutal on its face, but this framework has seen the pattern before. Every prior stretch where the model spent extended time below a -2.0 z-score, late 2018, mid-2022, early 2015, preceded forward twelve-month returns north of 75%. The most extreme reading in this dataset, -4.68 in November 2018, landed almost exactly on Bitcoin's cycle bottom near $3,792.
I'm not calling a bottom. The model never claims exact lows, and readings can compress further before reversing, as 2018 proved. What it shows is current positioning statistically resembles capitulation far more than a mid-cycle correction. Out of 229 signals since 2011, back-to-back Max Conviction firings this close together have historically marked maximum pain, not drawdown noise.
This is a framework built for discipline, not prediction. It tells you when data says accumulate, not where the bottom is.
Written by Crazzyblockk
As of July 15, the standardized RCV reading sits at -2.35, roughly the bottom 6% of the dataset back to 2009. The market has sat inside my "Deep Value" zone for twenty straight days, and the framework has fired its highest-conviction signal, 3x Max Conviction, twice in the past two weeks, on July 2 and July 9.
To see why that matters, it helps to know what RCV measures. Instead of tracking price alone, it isolates the variance between realized cap and market cap relative to its own rolling history, capturing how stretched or compressed investor cost basis has become versus current valuation.
When that variance compresses into deeply negative z-score territory, the emotional premium built during rallies has largely been priced out. The metric doesn't read narrative, it reads the distribution of capital.
Bitcoin trades near $64,700, down 48% from October's all-time high of $124,700. Brutal on its face, but this framework has seen the pattern before. Every prior stretch where the model spent extended time below a -2.0 z-score, late 2018, mid-2022, early 2015, preceded forward twelve-month returns north of 75%. The most extreme reading in this dataset, -4.68 in November 2018, landed almost exactly on Bitcoin's cycle bottom near $3,792.
I'm not calling a bottom. The model never claims exact lows, and readings can compress further before reversing, as 2018 proved. What it shows is current positioning statistically resembles capitulation far more than a mid-cycle correction. Out of 229 signals since 2011, back-to-back Max Conviction firings this close together have historically marked maximum pain, not drawdown noise.
This is a framework built for discipline, not prediction. It tells you when data says accumulate, not where the bottom is.
Written by Crazzyblockk
116
Partly True
Article
SK Hynix Is Leading Gate's Stock Volume 🇰🇷Korean stocks now make up 63.5% of all stock trading volume on Gate, up from just 5% a few weeks ago.
One company explains nearly all of that increase: SK Hynix.
Gate added tokenized trading for leading Korean stocks in late June. Around the same time, SK Hynix passed Samsung Electronics to become South Korea's most valuable listed company for the first time in more than 25 years, helped by strong demand for AI memory chips.
Over the past 30 days, SK Hynix recorded roughly $893 million in trading volume on Gate. Samsung Electronics recorded about $53 million.
The data points to concentrated demand rather than broad interest in Korean stocks. Trading has centered on SK Hynix, making Korean equities the largest stock market on Gate by volume.
Written by maartunn
SK Hynix Is Leading Gate's Stock Volume 🇰🇷
Korean stocks now make up 63.5% of all stock trading volume on Gate, up from just 5% a few weeks ago.
One company explains nearly all of that increase: SK Hynix.
Gate added tokenized trading for leading Korean stocks in late June. Around the same time, SK Hynix passed Samsung Electronics to become South Korea's most valuable listed company for the first time in more than 25 years, helped by strong demand for AI memory chips.
Over the past 30 days, SK Hynix recorded roughly $893 million in trading volume on Gate. Samsung Electronics recorded about $53 million.
The data points to concentrated demand rather than broad interest in Korean stocks. Trading has centered on SK Hynix, making Korean equities the largest stock market on Gate by volume.
Written by maartunn
One company explains nearly all of that increase: SK Hynix.
Gate added tokenized trading for leading Korean stocks in late June. Around the same time, SK Hynix passed Samsung Electronics to become South Korea's most valuable listed company for the first time in more than 25 years, helped by strong demand for AI memory chips.
Over the past 30 days, SK Hynix recorded roughly $893 million in trading volume on Gate. Samsung Electronics recorded about $53 million.
The data points to concentrated demand rather than broad interest in Korean stocks. Trading has centered on SK Hynix, making Korean equities the largest stock market on Gate by volume.
Written by maartunn
632
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
FootballSeason2026
796,204 views
8,493 Discussing
#FootballSeason2026 🌍 Football Season 2026 – Today's Prediction (19 July)
🏆 FIFA World Cup Final
🇪🇸 Spain 🆚 Argentina 🇦🇷
The biggest stage in football is set. Spain's disciplined defense meets Argentina's experience and attacking quality in what promises to be an unforgettable final. Both teams arrive in outstanding form, making this one of the most anticipated World Cup finals in recent years.
📊 Win Probability (opinion, not certainty):
🇦🇷 Argentina: 52%
🤝 Draw (90 mins): 25%
🇪🇸 Spain: 23%
Who are you supporting? 🇦🇷 or 🇪🇸 👇
#WorldCupFinal #argentina #Spain #football 😇
kabiraa15RR
·0 Likes
·15 views
CLARITYActAwaitsSenateProgress
3,887 views
138 Discussing
SKHynixADRsTradeOver25%Premium
7,005 views
192 Discussing