After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
Now BTC suddenly rises 5%. What is your first reaction?
A. Buy immediately—I don’t want to miss out B. Wait for a pullback to enter C. First look at volume/market activity, then decide D. Do nothing and wait for system signals
There’s no standard answer, but your choice will tell me what kind of trader you are.
Today a reader asked me: “How do you manage not to stare at the charts?”
I said: “Because I clearly know that watching the charts won’t make me earn an extra cent.”
The system has already told me where to enter, where to place the stop-loss, and what the target is.
What’s left is to wait.
Many people think that “serious trading” means staring at the candlestick chart every day. But in reality, true seriousness is when you have no signal and, with discipline, you do nothing.
Waiting is your position. Staying still is your strategy.
When was the last time you “restrained yourself and didn’t move”?
It took me several months to use AI to help build three BTC futures quantitative signal sets.
Each of the three strategies has its own role: · SYS03 EMA triple pulse — tracking the main mid-term trend wave; 54 trades in the past year, profit factor 1.46 · SYS05 volatility energy breakout — dual squeeze with Bollinger Bands + Keltner Channels to capture energy surges; profit factor 1.49 · SYS06 RSI divergence reversal — only 15 trades in the past year; win rate 66.67%, profit factor 3.57, maximum drawdown 0.25%
All of them are backtested on TradingView. You can reproduce the numbers yourself—no need to trust what I say.
If you’re interested, DM me directly on X (Twitter). Limited spots—first come, first served.
Resistance level: in the upper 1–2% range (with prior dense trading) Support level: around the lower 1.5% (ascending trendline)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks above resistance with increased volume → confirm the direction and you can follow If it rises on low volume → wait for a pullback and then reassess
Days with no trading are also a kind of trading decision.
Resistance: In the upper 1–2% range (there was heavy prior trading) Support: Around 1.5% below (uptrend line)
Volume Interpretation: If it breaks through resistance with increased volume → direction is confirmed; you can follow. If it rises on low volume → wait for a pullback and then reassess.
Days without trading are also a kind of trading decision.
Trading for five years—the one thing that cost me the most in fees:
It wasn’t misreading the direction. It wasn’t picking the wrong coin.
It was that, without a system, I relied on emotional trading.
When the market was good: I held positions at full size, thinking I was a genius. When the market turned worse: I kept switching directions, stopped out and then immediately went the other way, and finally got hit on both sides.
During that period, I went back through my trade records— When I made money, I always had reasons. When I lost money, I also always had reasons.
The issue isn’t whether the reasons are right or wrong; It’s that I didn’t have a fixed framework to constrain myself.
Later, I forced myself to systematize— No matter how strong the feelings were, if there was no signal, I didn’t move.
It was painful for a while, but the results became stable.
With a system versus without one, the gap after five years isn’t in returns—it’s in mindset.
Why do I trust quantitative systems, not “feelings”?
Because feelings can fool you, but data won’t.
Looking back at my trading records over the past five years: · The two years of trading based on feelings: huge account fluctuations, and my mood too · The three years after going systematic: much more stable; even when I lost, it was within expectations
Quant trading isn’t万能 (a cure-all), but it does one very important thing: It prevents “emotions” from interfering with decisions.
If the signal comes, act. If no signal comes, wait. That’s it.
Resistance levels: within the upper 1–2% range (there was previously heavy trading there) Support levels: around the lower 1.5% (the uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If you break through resistance with increased volume → confirm the direction and you can follow it. If price rises on decreasing volume → wait for a pullback and then reassess.
Even days with no trading are a kind of trading decision.
Several Key Levels Worth Watching for BTC Today 07/16
Current price: $64,733
Resistance levels: In the upper 1–2% zone (there was dense prior trading) Support levels: Around 1.5% below (uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks above resistance with increased volume → confirms the direction, and you can follow. If it rises on declining volume → wait for a pullback and then reassess.
No-trade days are also a kind of trading decision.
Fed policy changes and how they affect the crypto market — lazy summary.
Rate cuts → weaker US dollar → risk assets rise → crypto benefits Rate hikes → stronger US dollar → risk assets under pressure → crypto trades sideways
But reality is more complex than this: The narrative of BTC as “digital gold” is maturing, and traditional safe-haven logic is starting to apply to BTC.
That means BTC’s future price action may track more like gold, rather than purely risk assets.
This is a trend worth continuing to watch.
Do you think BTC now is more like “gold” or “a tech stock”?
Fed policy changes and their impact on the crypto market — quick summary.
Rate cuts → US dollar weakens → risk assets rise → crypto market benefits Rate hikes → US dollar strengthens → risk assets come under pressure → crypto market churns
But reality is more complicated: The narrative of BTC as “digital gold” is maturing, and traditional safe-haven logic is starting to apply to BTC.
That means in the future, BTC’s price action may track gold more closely, not just pure risk assets.
This is a trend worth watching continuously.
Do you think BTC right now is more like “gold” or “tech stocks”?
Tell a trading mistake that left the deepest impression on me.
It was when I was just starting to build quantitative systems.
The system generated a short-selling signal. I glanced at it and thought, “The direction is wrong,” so I didn’t execute it.
If I had taken that trade, the profit factor would have been 4R.
What’s even more frightening is that later I “made my own judgment” and went long—and I stopped out.
That day made me realize something: I designed the system because I don’t trust my own intuition. If I don’t trust the system, what’s the point of having it?
From that day on, I no longer “override” the system signals.