After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
Now BTC suddenly jumps 5%. What’s your first reaction?
A. Buy immediately—I don’t want to miss out B. Wait for a pullback to enter C. First check volume/liquidity, then decide D. Do nothing and wait for system signals
There’s no right or wrong answer, but your choice will tell me what kind of trader you are.
Leave a comment and tell me your pick—I’ll analyze it.
Someone said: «I’m always getting liquidated, or on the way to getting liquidated. I just want to learn from you.»
That line made me think for a long time.
Because I’ve walked that road too. I know that feeling—zeroing out again and again, and telling yourself, “Next time for sure.” I understand it too well.
But what he said—“I’m not that greedy. I just want to learn”— In a market full of leverage dreams, the person who can say that has already won half the battle in mindset.
The ones who truly manage to survive in the market, are never the smartest or the boldest gambler.
It’s the one who stays low-key and is willing to admit when they’re wrong.
If you’re also on the road, leave a comment and tell me which stage you’re stuck at.
Tell a trading mistake that left the deepest impression on me.
That was when I was just starting to build quantitative systems.
The system generated a short signal. I glanced at it and thought, “The direction is wrong,” so I didn’t execute.
As a result, if that trade had been executed, the profit factor would have been 4R.
Even scarier is that later, based on my own “judgment,” I went long—and I stopped out.
That day made me understand something: I design the system because I don’t trust my own intuition. If I don’t trust the system, what’s the point of having one?
From that day on, I no longer “override” the system’s signals.
When building my first quant trading system, I stepped into three pitfalls.
Pitfall 1: Overfitting The backtest looked unbelievably great, but as soon as I went live, it fell apart. Reason: I tuned the parameters too closely to historical data.
Pitfall 2: Ignoring trading fees In the backtest, I earned $50 per trade, but in live trading, after deducting fees, it was only $15. My returns got cut by 70% straight away.
Pitfall 3: No stop-loss logic “Quant systems don’t do anything reckless.” Until one market move wiped out 20% in a single sweep, and I realized quants can blow up too.
The SYS series was built gradually only after I’d already fallen into these three pitfalls. No pitfalls, no system.
Resistance: in the 1-2% range above (with previous heavy trading volume) Support: around 1.5% below (uptrend line)
Volume analysis: If it breaks resistance with increased volume → confirmation of direction, can follow If it rises on shrinking volume → wait for a pullback before considering
The market is always there, and opportunities come every week. But your mindset is your most important asset.
When your mindset gets messed up—everything looks like an opportunity, and the results are all traps. When your mindset is steady—when opportunities come, you can see clearly.
After trading for so long, I want to ask you one question.
Right now, on your trading journey, what is the biggest obstacle?
A. I can’t understand technical analysis B. I get it, but I can’t control myself C. There’s no pattern in position management D. Once the mindset takes a hit, it all falls apart
Leave a comment and tell me—I’ll definitely respond when I see it.
Not trying to sell a course. I’m just genuinely curious, and I also want to see where everyone gets stuck.
Just entered the market: you’re desperate to double every day. After one year: you start learning to wait for signals. After three years: you realize that “not doing” is a skill.
The market won’t disappear—opportunities are out there every week. But your principal—using it the wrong way once could mean it’s gone.
Don’t use a “fast” pace—use a “slow” strategy. Don’t trade by “guessing”—trade by “waiting.”
Go a bit slower, be steadier—so you can go farther.
The core logic of SYS03, explained in one sentence:
All three EMA moving averages must be aligned in the same direction, and the momentum indicator must be confirmed synchronously—only then will the signal be triggered.
Why so strict?
Because I’ve seen too many people enter when they “feel it’s about to go up,” then watch the direction reverse, yet keep holding on because they “don’t have a clear stop-loss level,” and end up getting wiped out.
SYS03’s strict conditions are designed to filter out these “looks-like” false signals.
Do less, but every time there’s a reason.
Search for SYS03 on TradingView and you can run your own backtests.
Market Weekly Report | What Is BTC Telling Us This Week?
Overall, this week BTC showed a high-level consolidation pattern. Trading volume gradually shrank, indicating that both bulls and bears are waiting.
Typically, there are two ways such a formation ends: 1. Trading volume suddenly expands → a direction is chosen 2. Continue ranging until an external catalyst appears
My current view: Until the direction is clear, keep observing.
Only after confirmation is made is the most effortless approach.
Now, BTC suddenly jumped 5%—what’s your first reaction?
A. Buy immediately—I don’t want to miss out B. Wait for a pullback to enter C. First check the volume and momentum, then decide D. Do nothing and wait for system signals
There’s no right or wrong answer, but your choice will tell me what kind of trader you are.
Comment and tell me your selection—I’ll analyze it.
Traded for five years—one thing that cost me the most tuition:
It’s not that I chose the wrong direction. It’s not that I picked the wrong coin.
It’s that when I didn’t have a system, I relied on emotional trading.
When the market was good: I would go in with a full position, thinking I was a genius. When the market turned bad: I’d constantly switch directions—stop-loss, then immediately flip—and in the end got hit on both sides.
During that period, I went back through my trading records— When I made money, I always had a reason. When I lost money, I also always had a reason.
The problem isn’t whether the reasons were right or wrong— it’s that I didn’t have a set framework to constrain myself.
Later, I forced myself to become systematic— No matter how strong the feelings were, if there was no signal, I wouldn’t move.
It was painful for a while, but the results became stable.
With a system versus without one, the five-year gap isn’t in returns—it’s in mindset.
During the time I was working as a KOL, honestly, I wasn’t happy.
Every day I had to produce “professional-looking” content. When it came to the truth, sometimes the direction wasn’t even that certain—but the platform required you to provide “a clear point of view.”
After a while, you wouldn’t know whether you were actually analyzing things, or just performing an analysis.
Later, I stepped out and returned to independent trading.
At first, my income went down, but I could sleep well.
Now, every post I share in the public square is a record of my real observations and the trades I executed—whether I profit or lose, I put it all on the table.
There aren’t many people who do things this way, but I think this is the right way.
It took me a few months to use AI to build three sets of BTC futures quantitative trading signals.
Each of the three strategies has its own role: · SYS03 EMA triple impulse — tracks the main wave of the mid-term trend; 54 trades in the past year, profit factor 1.46 · SYS05 volatility energy breakout — dual squeeze of Bollinger Bands + Keltner Channels to capture energy surges; profit factor 1.49 · SYS06 RSI divergence reversal — only 15 trades in the past year; win rate 66.67%, profit factor 3.57, maximum drawdown 0.25%
All tested on TradingView. You can reproduce the numbers yourself—no need to trust what I say.
If you’re interested, DM me directly on X (Twitter). Limited spots available—first come, first served.