Htp96
Verified Creator
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people
X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
Open Trade
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
7.8 Years
101 Following
23.3K+ Followers
12.6K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
PINNED
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions
Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
Vanar Chain: The first AI-native Layer 1 for Web3 – Why is it different?
When I hear the phrase 'AI-native Layer 1', my first reflex is skepticism. Crypto has previously attached too many buzzwords to everything: AI, Web3, metaverse. And then most just stops at surface-level integration.
Therefore, the question for me is not whether @Vanarchain to use AI or not. But where AI is in the system design, and whether it truly changes how blockchain is used or not.
Most current chains see AI as an application running on top. AI is a trading bot, an agent responding to users, a data analysis tool off-chain. The underlying blockchain is almost unaware of AI's existence.
Therefore, the question for me is not whether @Vanarchain to use AI or not. But where AI is in the system design, and whether it truly changes how blockchain is used or not.
Most current chains see AI as an application running on top. AI is a trading bot, an agent responding to users, a data analysis tool off-chain. The underlying blockchain is almost unaware of AI's existence.
Bitcoin hits 15-month low amid cryptocurrency liquidations
The price of Bitcoin has dropped to its lowest level in 15 months, falling below the threshold of 73,000 USD, amid a wave of liquidations in the cryptocurrency market exceeding 800 million USD in just the past 24 hours.
When looking at the price chart during the US session, I can clearly see the selling pressure increasing significantly at the times of thinnest liquidity.
Data from TradingView shows that $BTC /USD at one point dropped below 72,500 USD on Bitstamp, breaking the previous local low. The brief recovery above 76,000 USD was quickly sold back down.
When looking at the price chart during the US session, I can clearly see the selling pressure increasing significantly at the times of thinnest liquidity.
Data from TradingView shows that $BTC /USD at one point dropped below 72,500 USD on Bitstamp, breaking the previous local low. The brief recovery above 76,000 USD was quickly sold back down.
Should you invest in XPL in 2026? An analysis of risk-reward
When asking whether to invest in @Plasma XPL in 2026 or not, the first thing I must set aside is the market's familiar reflex: searching for narrative. Plasma is not the type of project that can tell stories easier in a bull market.
It does not promise a quick 're-rate' thanks to new technology or new DeFi. If you look at XPL through that lens, it is easy to conclude wrongly from the start.
Plasma, by nature, is not designed to capitalize on market euphoria, but to leverage something rarely discussed in crypto: stable, repeated, and cost-sensitive cash flow. Stablecoins are the clearest example.
It does not promise a quick 're-rate' thanks to new technology or new DeFi. If you look at XPL through that lens, it is easy to conclude wrongly from the start.
Plasma, by nature, is not designed to capitalize on market euphoria, but to leverage something rarely discussed in crypto: stable, repeated, and cost-sensitive cash flow. Stablecoins are the clearest example.
Bitcoin and Fear: Why Investors Self-Sabotage Compound Returns
In the four most recent major bear market periods – 2018, 2020, 2022, and now 2025 – I see a repeating pattern with almost brutal accuracy.
When fear reaches its peak, the majority always chooses to flee. And I have been very close to making that decision before.
Data on capital flows from U.S. mutual funds, ETFs, to stocks, always the same. Capital is withdrawn most strongly at the worst times. Not because long-term fundamental factors suddenly disappear. But because the pain felt in the short term exceeds human emotional endurance.
When fear reaches its peak, the majority always chooses to flee. And I have been very close to making that decision before.
Data on capital flows from U.S. mutual funds, ETFs, to stocks, always the same. Capital is withdrawn most strongly at the worst times. Not because long-term fundamental factors suddenly disappear. But because the pain felt in the short term exceeds human emotional endurance.
Vanar Chain vs Ethereum: Comparing speed, cost, and AI integration
As you can see, when comparing Vanar Chain with Ethereum in terms of speed, cost, and AI integration, I always view these two systems as addressing two different problems.
Ethereum is a standard settlement layer, prioritizing security and a high degree of decentralization.
From my perspective, slow confirmation speed and high gas fees are difficult to avoid, especially unsuitable for applications with high-frequency repetitive behaviors.
Vanar $VANRY does not try to compete for that role. They choose to optimize for fast speed and near-zero costs, serving games, digital content, and PayFi, where the user experience would collapse if every interaction had to consider gas.
This is a deliberate trade-off, accepting a narrower scope in exchange for a smoother experience. Regarding AI integration, Ethereum currently leaves much of the logic at the application layer, while Vanar brings AI down to this operational layer.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
As you can see, when comparing Vanar Chain with Ethereum in terms of speed, cost, and AI integration, I always view these two systems as addressing two different problems.
Ethereum is a standard settlement layer, prioritizing security and a high degree of decentralization.
From my perspective, slow confirmation speed and high gas fees are difficult to avoid, especially unsuitable for applications with high-frequency repetitive behaviors.
Vanar $VANRY does not try to compete for that role. They choose to optimize for fast speed and near-zero costs, serving games, digital content, and PayFi, where the user experience would collapse if every interaction had to consider gas.
This is a deliberate trade-off, accepting a narrower scope in exchange for a smoother experience. Regarding AI integration, Ethereum currently leaves much of the logic at the application layer, while Vanar brings AI down to this operational layer.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
Is Plasma a sidechain of Bitcoin or an independent Layer-1?
I see many people calling Plasma a “sidechain of Bitcoin,” perhaps because the name evokes the concept of @Plasma from the past. However, if you look at how this system operates, that description can be quite misleading.
Plasma is not a sidechain of Bitcoin.
It does not inherit security from Bitcoin, nor does it rely on Bitcoin's block time or consensus to process daily transactions.
Instead, Plasma is built as an independent Layer-1, with its own consensus mechanism, validator set, and security assumptions.
The reason Plasma $XPL looks like a sidechain is that it uses other chains as a safe anchor in special situations: withdrawals, disputes, or final verifications.
Therefore, Plasma does not exist “based on” Bitcoin. It stands alone but accepts that in the most critical moments, anchoring to a larger chain still makes sense.
In my view, it is this separation that allows Plasma to be both flexible in operation and maintain a point of trust when needed.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
I see many people calling Plasma a “sidechain of Bitcoin,” perhaps because the name evokes the concept of @Plasma from the past. However, if you look at how this system operates, that description can be quite misleading.
Plasma is not a sidechain of Bitcoin.
It does not inherit security from Bitcoin, nor does it rely on Bitcoin's block time or consensus to process daily transactions.
Instead, Plasma is built as an independent Layer-1, with its own consensus mechanism, validator set, and security assumptions.
The reason Plasma $XPL looks like a sidechain is that it uses other chains as a safe anchor in special situations: withdrawals, disputes, or final verifications.
Therefore, Plasma does not exist “based on” Bitcoin. It stands alone but accepts that in the most critical moments, anchoring to a larger chain still makes sense.
In my view, it is this separation that allows Plasma to be both flexible in operation and maintain a point of trust when needed.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Ethereum reaches network usage peak, price still down 50%: Rare low valuation signal
Ethereum is in a state where if you look purely at the price, many people would think it has 'run its course'. However, if you separate emotions from the chart and look at the on-chain data, the picture is completely different.
At this moment, $ETH is being valued at its lowest since 2019. The price has dropped nearly 50% from its peak, while activity on the Ethereum network has just set a new all-time high. In other words, the price has halved, but the level of network usage has increased by about 300%. This is a very strong mismatch between price and actual usage value.
At this moment, $ETH is being valued at its lowest since 2019. The price has dropped nearly 50% from its peak, while activity on the Ethereum network has just set a new all-time high. In other words, the price has halved, but the level of network usage has increased by about 300%. This is a very strong mismatch between price and actual usage value.
Bitcoin plunges 40%: Technical adjustment or the beginning of a long-term downtrend?
To be honest, the feeling of unease when seeing the red price boards continuously in recent days is very understandable. It strikes at the collective memory of 2022, when the market was crashing uncontrollably and confidence was eroded day by day.
However, if we temporarily set aside emotions and analyze the current market structure coldly, I believe this picture is more complex and has a different depth compared to the previous systemic crash.
However, if we temporarily set aside emotions and analyze the current market structure coldly, I believe this picture is more complex and has a different depth compared to the previous systemic crash.
Bitcoin enters a bear market at the fastest weakening pace since 2022
From my perspective, Bitcoin's current bear market is showing signs of early and more pronounced weakness compared to the 2022 cycle.
Since the moment $BTC officially broke the 365-day moving average on 12/11/2025 — a technical milestone often viewed as the boundary between long-term uptrends and bear market phases — the price has dropped approximately 23% in just 83 days.
This figure contrasts sharply with the early 2022 period, when Bitcoin only corrected about 6% in the same timeframe after losing the 365-day MA.
Since the moment $BTC officially broke the 365-day moving average on 12/11/2025 — a technical milestone often viewed as the boundary between long-term uptrends and bear market phases — the price has dropped approximately 23% in just 83 days.
This figure contrasts sharply with the early 2022 period, when Bitcoin only corrected about 6% in the same timeframe after losing the 365-day MA.
Does Plasma live off a bull market or real demand?
In your opinion, the question @Plasma does Plasma live off a bull market or real demand seems to evaluate the project, but to me, it is actually a question about the nature of growth in crypto.
Many things seem 'successful' in a bull market, but only a few continue to exist when the cash flow withdraws.
If Plasma is just a product of a cycle, it will inflate very quickly when the market is hot and deflate immediately when the narrative shifts.
Many things seem 'successful' in a bull market, but only a few continue to exist when the cash flow withdraws.
If Plasma is just a product of a cycle, it will inflate very quickly when the market is hot and deflate immediately when the narrative shifts.
Why does Plasma prioritize stability over hot growth?
There was a moment when I realized @Plasma does not behave like most other blockchain projects.
It does not chase TVL at all costs, does not massively expand use cases, and does not try to create explosive growth based on short-term incentives. Initially, this looked quite... slow.
But the more I looked closely, the more I realized that Plasma was prioritizing something entirely different: the stability of behavior, rather than the growth rate of the numbers.
It does not chase TVL at all costs, does not massively expand use cases, and does not try to create explosive growth based on short-term incentives. Initially, this looked quite... slow.
But the more I looked closely, the more I realized that Plasma was prioritizing something entirely different: the stability of behavior, rather than the growth rate of the numbers.
How Vanar handles game state on-chain?
When it comes to handling game state on-chain, I always see this as a place where many projects talk too much and think not enough.
Games are not like DeFi.
Game state is not just balance or position, but a continuous set of behaviors: moving, interacting, consuming, unlocking, winning or losing.
If you try to shove all that state onto the chain in a 'purely blockchain' way, the experience will break right from the start.
Therefore, the question is not how much game state to put on-chain, but what parts they choose to put on and why.
Games are not like DeFi.
Game state is not just balance or position, but a continuous set of behaviors: moving, interacting, consuming, unlocking, winning or losing.
If you try to shove all that state onto the chain in a 'purely blockchain' way, the experience will break right from the start.
Therefore, the question is not how much game state to put on-chain, but what parts they choose to put on and why.
How does Vanar handle game asset inflation?
When talking about game asset inflation, I think @Vanarchain understands quite well that this is not a matter of 'tokenomics', but rather a behavioral issue.
Most on-chain games fail not due to a lack of players, but because assets are created faster than the rate at which value is consumed.
Vanar's approach $VANRY does not lie in restricting supply through hard parameters, but in designing the flow of usage.
As I see it, assets only have value when they are consumed, locked, or tied to specific rights and behaviors within the game and content ecosystem.
However, if items are tied to gameplay progress, access rights, or revenue distribution, their lifecycle will be longer and less likely to be dumped in bulk.
In my experience, the risk lies in: if studios are not disciplined enough in gameplay design, no matter how good the infrastructure is, it cannot save against inflation. And that is the real test for Vanar.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
When talking about game asset inflation, I think @Vanarchain understands quite well that this is not a matter of 'tokenomics', but rather a behavioral issue.
Most on-chain games fail not due to a lack of players, but because assets are created faster than the rate at which value is consumed.
Vanar's approach $VANRY does not lie in restricting supply through hard parameters, but in designing the flow of usage.
As I see it, assets only have value when they are consumed, locked, or tied to specific rights and behaviors within the game and content ecosystem.
However, if items are tied to gameplay progress, access rights, or revenue distribution, their lifecycle will be longer and less likely to be dumped in bulk.
In my experience, the risk lies in: if studios are not disciplined enough in gameplay design, no matter how good the infrastructure is, it cannot save against inflation. And that is the real test for Vanar.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
Plasma stands between Ethereum and centralized payment systems
Hello everyone, I see @Plasma is in a rather strange position: not entirely like Ethereum, but also not a traditional centralized payment system.
Ethereum offers openness, verifiability, and trustless withdrawal rights.
They are fast, cheap, and familiar. But users have to trust a single intermediary, accepting control and policy risk. Money moves quickly, but withdrawal rights do not belong to the users.
Plasma $XPL chooses to stand between those two models. It tries to keep the verification and withdrawal layer on-chain, while making the daily experience as similar to a centralized system as possible.
In my opinion, Plasma can do it; it does not replace Ethereum or banks. It becomes an intermediary layer for those who want speed without completely giving up control.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Hello everyone, I see @Plasma is in a rather strange position: not entirely like Ethereum, but also not a traditional centralized payment system.
Ethereum offers openness, verifiability, and trustless withdrawal rights.
They are fast, cheap, and familiar. But users have to trust a single intermediary, accepting control and policy risk. Money moves quickly, but withdrawal rights do not belong to the users.
Plasma $XPL chooses to stand between those two models. It tries to keep the verification and withdrawal layer on-chain, while making the daily experience as similar to a centralized system as possible.
In my opinion, Plasma can do it; it does not replace Ethereum or banks. It becomes an intermediary layer for those who want speed without completely giving up control.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
The explosion of Stablecoin in 2026 and the role of Plasma
I feel like 2026 is the time when stablecoins truly emerge and @Plasma is one of the very promising projects in crypto to become a familiar financial infrastructure.
According to my experience, stablecoins are increasingly used for very everyday tasks: preserving value, transferring money, cross-border payments. At this time, the demand is not for yield, but for stability and predictability.
In that context, the limitations of multi-functional chains become more apparent. Payments must compete for blockspace with DeFi and speculative activities, making fees and delays difficult to control.
This is the gap that Plasma is targeting. Instead of trying to do everything, Plasma focuses on making stablecoin transfers boring: fast, cheap, and requiring little thought.
In my view, if stablecoins truly explode in 2026, then Plasma is a quite promising project in this cycle, betting that in such a world, being unobtrusive is the advantage.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
I feel like 2026 is the time when stablecoins truly emerge and @Plasma is one of the very promising projects in crypto to become a familiar financial infrastructure.
According to my experience, stablecoins are increasingly used for very everyday tasks: preserving value, transferring money, cross-border payments. At this time, the demand is not for yield, but for stability and predictability.
In that context, the limitations of multi-functional chains become more apparent. Payments must compete for blockspace with DeFi and speculative activities, making fees and delays difficult to control.
This is the gap that Plasma is targeting. Instead of trying to do everything, Plasma focuses on making stablecoin transfers boring: fast, cheap, and requiring little thought.
In my view, if stablecoins truly explode in 2026, then Plasma is a quite promising project in this cycle, betting that in such a world, being unobtrusive is the advantage.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
On-chain data shows Vitalik Buterin selling ETH on the day
Vitalik Buterin recorded the sale activity $ETH on the day
According to on-chain data recorded today, an address identified as related to Vitalik Buterin has executed a sale transaction of ETH with an estimated total value of around 2 million USD. This information quickly attracted the attention of the market community.
According to some sources, the purpose of this sale activity is said to serve fundraising activities and support the development of the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the context of the market undergoing a downturn (bear market).
According to on-chain data recorded today, an address identified as related to Vitalik Buterin has executed a sale transaction of ETH with an estimated total value of around 2 million USD. This information quickly attracted the attention of the market community.
According to some sources, the purpose of this sale activity is said to serve fundraising activities and support the development of the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the context of the market undergoing a downturn (bear market).
Bitcoin is trading close to the key price level of the long-term investment strategy.
Bitcoin is trading close to the key price level of the long-term investment strategy.
In my observation, the market is currently under significant downward pressure, with short rebounds lacking sustainable momentum.
In this context, it is inevitable that even institutional investors are beginning to record fluctuations in profits and losses. This reflects the reality that the short-term trend of Bitcoin is still not truly stable.
In my observation, the market is currently under significant downward pressure, with short rebounds lacking sustainable momentum.
In this context, it is inevitable that even institutional investors are beginning to record fluctuations in profits and losses. This reflects the reality that the short-term trend of Bitcoin is still not truly stable.
Bitcoin is currently below its fair value according to market models
In my observation, based on current pricing models, the fair value of Bitcoin is around 85,000 USD, while the current market price is only about 77,000 USD.
This indicates that $BTC is trading below its fair value, and in my experience, this state usually does not last too long.
Historically, I have noticed that the market price of Bitcoin rarely stays below its fair value for long periods.
This indicates that $BTC is trading below its fair value, and in my experience, this state usually does not last too long.
Historically, I have noticed that the market price of Bitcoin rarely stays below its fair value for long periods.
Vanar Chain's 2026 Roadmap: Upcoming Major Updates
I was about to go to sleep but checked my phone and saw people asking about the 2026 roadmap of @Vanarchain , so I wrote this article, which I think is not about the eye-catching feature names, but how those updates connect back to answer a bigger question: what does Vanar want to become in the coming years?
The roadmap is not just a list of feature releases; it is a strategic positioning map in the context of a changing market.
The roadmap is not just a list of feature releases; it is a strategic positioning map in the context of a changing market.
Login to explore more contents