Htp96
Verified Creator
We are the Vietnamese non-profit crypto community that helps Vietnamese people
X (Twitter) : @htp96_community
Open Trade
BNB Holder
Frequent Trader
7.8 Years
103 Following
23.4K+ Followers
12.7K+ Liked
1.0K+ Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
PINNED
Below is the information I want to share with you HTP96 about Binance commissions
Currently, you can receive a commission of up to 50%, instead of the default level as before. If you want to transfer the referral to me, just read this article for about 1 minute and it's done.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
READ NOW
Instead of receiving a default commission before, now Binance will set it according to the level of 30-40-50% depending on the level you achieve.
Commission upgrade: Can occur daily – just meet the criteria, and the system will automatically upgrade the next day.
How will Vanar be affected when the market is in downtrend?
Today, looking back at the market in the context of downtrend, I think more about a question that not many like to ask when prices are weak:
How will it be affected when the market goes down?
For me, this is not a question about token price, but a question about the durability of the design assumptions that Vanar is pursuing.
The downtrend is always the truest test for any infrastructure. When liquidity shrinks, the narrative cools down, and incentives disappear, what remains is: will the dev continue to build, and will the product continue to be used?
How will it be affected when the market goes down?
For me, this is not a question about token price, but a question about the durability of the design assumptions that Vanar is pursuing.
The downtrend is always the truest test for any infrastructure. When liquidity shrinks, the narrative cools down, and incentives disappear, what remains is: will the dev continue to build, and will the product continue to be used?
ETH/BTC hits a key support zone, altcoin enters a decisive phase
I am closely watching ETH/BTC, as this pair is currently in the important support zone of 0.029–0.03. It is not a zone to predict the bottom, but rather a zone that reflects the true sentiment of the market towards ETH.
If it bounces up from here, ETH could temporarily maintain its pace, at least reducing the pressure on the rest of the altcoins in the short term.
It is not a major bullish scenario, but rather a phase of 'holding on'. In the context of cautious cash flow, just $ETH not continuing to weaken is enough for the market to breathe easier.
If it bounces up from here, ETH could temporarily maintain its pace, at least reducing the pressure on the rest of the altcoins in the short term.
It is not a major bullish scenario, but rather a phase of 'holding on'. In the context of cautious cash flow, just $ETH not continuing to weaken is enough for the market to breathe easier.
Does Plasma directly compete with Cosmos app-chains?
The last time I thought about Cosmos was when transferring a stablecoin between two different systems. Nothing went wrong. But I still had to stop for a few beats. Check the route again. Check the destination chain. It felt familiar, but not light.
Stablecoins are supposed to be boring. They shouldn't require so much thought. But every time it involves multiple chains, multiple layers, I find myself having to 'pay attention' more than necessary.
Stablecoins are supposed to be boring. They shouldn't require so much thought. But every time it involves multiple chains, multiple layers, I find myself having to 'pay attention' more than necessary.
BTC trading below the cost price of large whales, is the 2022 scenario repeating?
I look at the whale group holding 100–1,000 BTC and there is one rather annoying detail: the price $BTC is currently trading below their Real Price, around 69,000 USD.
The last time this happened after BTC peaked was in June 2022. At that time, the price not only dropped below the cost basis of this group but also stayed below for nearly seven months. There was no quick bounce. No 'V-shape recovery'. Just a long, quiet period where the market had to digest all the old expectations.
The last time this happened after BTC peaked was in June 2022. At that time, the price not only dropped below the cost basis of this group but also stayed below for nearly seven months. There was no quick bounce. No 'V-shape recovery'. Just a long, quiet period where the market had to digest all the old expectations.
Is Vanar building infrastructure for use cases outside of crypto?
Is Vanar building infrastructure for use cases outside of crypto, and I believe the response should not be based on a roadmap or partnership, but rather on the assumptions of usage they are choosing.
If @Vanarchain is only targeting crypto users, they wouldn't need to emphasize the off-chain story.
Pure crypto use cases accept latency, fees, and a rougher UX, as long as everything is transparent on-chain. But Vanar $VANRY is going in the opposite direction.
This is the way I often see in products outside of crypto: games, entertainment, digital content, PayFi. Users don't care about what the chain is; they only care about whether the experience is smooth and if there are interruptions.
Of course, building infrastructure for use cases outside of crypto does not necessarily mean there will be adoption. The biggest risk is not having a product attractive enough to pull real users in.
But at least, Vanar is designing for a world where blockchain is the underlying infrastructure, not the main attraction.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
Is Vanar building infrastructure for use cases outside of crypto, and I believe the response should not be based on a roadmap or partnership, but rather on the assumptions of usage they are choosing.
If @Vanarchain is only targeting crypto users, they wouldn't need to emphasize the off-chain story.
Pure crypto use cases accept latency, fees, and a rougher UX, as long as everything is transparent on-chain. But Vanar $VANRY is going in the opposite direction.
This is the way I often see in products outside of crypto: games, entertainment, digital content, PayFi. Users don't care about what the chain is; they only care about whether the experience is smooth and if there are interruptions.
Of course, building infrastructure for use cases outside of crypto does not necessarily mean there will be adoption. The biggest risk is not having a product attractive enough to pull real users in.
But at least, Vanar is designing for a world where blockchain is the underlying infrastructure, not the main attraction.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
Why does Plasma need a separate chain instead of just being an L2 on Ethereum?
The first time I thought about @Plasma , I also wondered: why create a separate chain? A stablecoin running on L2 Ethereum seems sufficient. Cheaper, more familiar, with an existing ecosystem.
But every time I use a stablecoin on L2, I still have to pay attention. Not much, but how are the fees today? Is the network congested? Are there any apps causing delays?
The issue isn't with Ethereum or L2. It's that stablecoins will never be the only priority. When the market heats up, other things will take precedence. Transferring money becomes a secondary behavior.
Plasma $XPL chooses to create a separate chain to avoid that. Not to be stronger, but to be more predictable. When the system revolves solely around stablecoins, its behavior is less dependent on others.
The trade-off is just that: less flexibility. Fewer ecosystems. Adoption is harder. But with money, sometimes I accept fewer choices, as long as I don’t have to think too much each time I hit send.
The question is: are users willing to trade that familiarity for this sense of security? I am still observing.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
The first time I thought about @Plasma , I also wondered: why create a separate chain? A stablecoin running on L2 Ethereum seems sufficient. Cheaper, more familiar, with an existing ecosystem.
But every time I use a stablecoin on L2, I still have to pay attention. Not much, but how are the fees today? Is the network congested? Are there any apps causing delays?
The issue isn't with Ethereum or L2. It's that stablecoins will never be the only priority. When the market heats up, other things will take precedence. Transferring money becomes a secondary behavior.
Plasma $XPL chooses to create a separate chain to avoid that. Not to be stronger, but to be more predictable. When the system revolves solely around stablecoins, its behavior is less dependent on others.
The trade-off is just that: less flexibility. Fewer ecosystems. Adoption is harder. But with money, sometimes I accept fewer choices, as long as I don’t have to think too much each time I hit send.
The question is: are users willing to trade that familiarity for this sense of security? I am still observing.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
Historical indicators send signals: Bitcoin may avoid a deep decline
This morning, there are two extremely noteworthy signals that, in my opinion, the market should not take lightly.
First, the Fear and Greed Index has dropped to 5, the lowest level ever recorded.
Second, the RSI hit 15, an extremely oversold zone that has historically only appeared in 2018 and during the COVID crisis.
Therefore, I do not lean toward the scenario of Bitcoin $BTC soon breaking below $60K. When both sentiment and technicals are in such an extreme state, the market typically does not continue to decline sharply due to inertia, at least not in the short term. Selling pressure has often been largely relieved beforehand.
First, the Fear and Greed Index has dropped to 5, the lowest level ever recorded.
Second, the RSI hit 15, an extremely oversold zone that has historically only appeared in 2018 and during the COVID crisis.
Therefore, I do not lean toward the scenario of Bitcoin $BTC soon breaking below $60K. When both sentiment and technicals are in such an extreme state, the market typically does not continue to decline sharply due to inertia, at least not in the short term. Selling pressure has often been largely relieved beforehand.
Ethereum shows the 2020 cycle pattern, not repeating the 2022 scenario
$ETH , in my view, does not follow the cycle of 2022. What is happening now does not resemble a market breaking trend due to extreme tightening, but rather resembles the 2020 cycle – a phase where the market is preparing for a long-term expansion.
If we go back to the 2019–2020 cycle, the macro picture is quite clear. At that time, the Fed had ended quantitative control, began buying Treasury bills, and simultaneously cut interest rates.
If we go back to the 2019–2020 cycle, the macro picture is quite clear. At that time, the Fed had ended quantitative control, began buying Treasury bills, and simultaneously cut interest rates.
Bitcoin closes the third week below the 100-week MA: Long-term pressure still persists
Bitcoin has now closed the third consecutive week below the 100-week MA.
As of the time I'm writing this, BTC has been below that long-term trend line for 13 days.
Looking back at history, each time
it falls below the 100-week MA, the average duration is about 267 days.
The shortest time was only 34 days, and that was an extreme drop due to Covid – a rather special case.
Therefore, if we look purely at the data, the likelihood is that we will remain below this line for a longer time.
As of the time I'm writing this, BTC has been below that long-term trend line for 13 days.
Looking back at history, each time
it falls below the 100-week MA, the average duration is about 267 days.
The shortest time was only 34 days, and that was an extreme drop due to Covid – a rather special case.
Therefore, if we look purely at the data, the likelihood is that we will remain below this line for a longer time.
What problem is Vanar Chain solving that other EVM chains overlook?
Today browsing Square, I saw quite a few articles about the new EVM chain, especially @Vanarchain faster, cheaper, with a few technical improvements, adding a new layer of narrative.
After reading, I realized the familiar question has still not been addressed: what problem are these chains solving that previous EVM chains have truly overlooked?
For me, this question should not start from technology, but from the underlying assumptions that most EVM chains accept as obvious.
After reading, I realized the familiar question has still not been addressed: what problem are these chains solving that previous EVM chains have truly overlooked?
For me, this question should not start from technology, but from the underlying assumptions that most EVM chains accept as obvious.
WHAT IS SPECIAL ABOUT THE ZAMA PROJECT THAT ATTRACTS INVESTORS?
ZAMA is one of the notable projects attracting investors recently. Let's explore what makes this project special through this article.
What is ZAMA?
Zama is an open-source company specializing in cryptography, focusing on fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) to deploy smart contracts and security applications on all public blockchains.
Outstanding features of Zama:
FHE Technology: Zama provides FHE solutions that are over 100 times faster than previous versions, with post-quantum security capabilities, ensuring protection against attacks from quantum computers.
What is ZAMA?
Zama is an open-source company specializing in cryptography, focusing on fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) to deploy smart contracts and security applications on all public blockchains.
Outstanding features of Zama:
FHE Technology: Zama provides FHE solutions that are over 100 times faster than previous versions, with post-quantum security capabilities, ensuring protection against attacks from quantum computers.
Does Vanar really need its own blockchain, or just an L2?
The question @Vanarchain "Does it really need its own blockchain or just an L2?” for me is not a technical question, but a question about long-term assumptions for developers.
If I see Vanar merely as a platform needing low fees, low latency, and inherited security, then an L2 is sufficient. Many products aimed at the general public can be built well on L2, as long as the UX is decent and costs do not hinder behavior.
In that case, a private chain only adds burdens: operation, security, liquidity fragmentation.
But when I look at how Vanar $VANRY positions itself, they are not just optimizing for “running apps cheaper.” They are betting on a model where most behavior occurs off-chain, while rights, revenues, and final states need to be recorded in a very intentional way.
Here, a private chain is not for showcasing tech, but to firmly lock in the design assumptions that developers must rely on for long-term building.
In my view, an L2 forces me to accept someone else's assumptions. A private chain allows Vanar to choose the developers they want to retain. The risk is adoption. But if the use case truly requires this architecture, L2 will not be enough.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
The question @Vanarchain "Does it really need its own blockchain or just an L2?” for me is not a technical question, but a question about long-term assumptions for developers.
If I see Vanar merely as a platform needing low fees, low latency, and inherited security, then an L2 is sufficient. Many products aimed at the general public can be built well on L2, as long as the UX is decent and costs do not hinder behavior.
In that case, a private chain only adds burdens: operation, security, liquidity fragmentation.
But when I look at how Vanar $VANRY positions itself, they are not just optimizing for “running apps cheaper.” They are betting on a model where most behavior occurs off-chain, while rights, revenues, and final states need to be recorded in a very intentional way.
Here, a private chain is not for showcasing tech, but to firmly lock in the design assumptions that developers must rely on for long-term building.
In my view, an L2 forces me to accept someone else's assumptions. A private chain allows Vanar to choose the developers they want to retain. The risk is adoption. But if the use case truly requires this architecture, L2 will not be enough.
@Vanarchain #vanar $VANRY
Binance Spot officially launches spot campaign for Zama (ZAMA)
Binance Spot has officially launched a spot campaign for Zama (ZAMA), providing an opportunity for users to engage in trading and share a total prize pool of up to 45,000,000 ZAMA in the form of token vouchers.
Zama Protocol is an infrastructure project focused on the ability to process sensitive data on the blockchain.
The core point of Zama lies in the application of Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) – a technology that allows for direct computation on encrypted data without the need for decryption. As a result, assets and transaction states can be protected even when operating in the public environment of the blockchain.
Zama Protocol is an infrastructure project focused on the ability to process sensitive data on the blockchain.
The core point of Zama lies in the application of Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) – a technology that allows for direct computation on encrypted data without the need for decryption. As a result, assets and transaction states can be protected even when operating in the public environment of the blockchain.
The big issue that Plasma is addressing in crypto right now
I have been in this market long enough to hear almost every scalability story repeated over and over again.
@Plasma to me is not attractive because of TPS or performance numbers but because it touches on a very real issue of how to transfer large value without forcing people to trust intermediaries.
For many years, people have been used to putting money on a rollup chain or semi-centralized solutions and convincing themselves that everything is fine until something happens.
Every time the market shakes, the question of where my money is becomes very clear.
Plasma at least forces me to revisit the core question that marketing often avoids: if the system has a problem, can you withdraw your money back to L1, how long will it take, and do you need someone to act correctly or not.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
I have been in this market long enough to hear almost every scalability story repeated over and over again.
@Plasma to me is not attractive because of TPS or performance numbers but because it touches on a very real issue of how to transfer large value without forcing people to trust intermediaries.
For many years, people have been used to putting money on a rollup chain or semi-centralized solutions and convincing themselves that everything is fine until something happens.
Every time the market shakes, the question of where my money is becomes very clear.
Plasma at least forces me to revisit the core question that marketing often avoids: if the system has a problem, can you withdraw your money back to L1, how long will it take, and do you need someone to act correctly or not.
@Plasma #Plasma $XPL
$BTC UPDATE MARKET FOR YOU
There are only a few days left until the Lunar New Year
The market also had a sweep down to the 59k region
In my opinion, if the best scenario occurs, the market will bounce back to 76k before continuing to adjust strongly again.
I entered long at the 65k5 region and have already taken profits; if it adjusts further, I will rebuy long
Currently, I am checking a few strong altcoins and will share with you, remember to follow me
THIS IS A PERSONAL OPINION, NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE
Buy and trade here
👇
There are only a few days left until the Lunar New Year
The market also had a sweep down to the 59k region
In my opinion, if the best scenario occurs, the market will bounce back to 76k before continuing to adjust strongly again.
I entered long at the 65k5 region and have already taken profits; if it adjusts further, I will rebuy long
Currently, I am checking a few strong altcoins and will share with you, remember to follow me
THIS IS A PERSONAL OPINION, NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE
Buy and trade here
👇
Bitcoin and the correction trends in midterm election years
Historically, I have noticed that the counter-trend corrections of Bitcoin $BTC tend to end around March in midterm election years in the U.S.
This is quite an interesting point when looking at the intersection of the economic cycle, macro policies, and the developments of risky asset markets like Bitcoin.
In previous cycles, the early year phase is often accompanied by strong selling pressure, cautious sentiment, and capital standing by in observation.
This is quite an interesting point when looking at the intersection of the economic cycle, macro policies, and the developments of risky asset markets like Bitcoin.
In previous cycles, the early year phase is often accompanied by strong selling pressure, cautious sentiment, and capital standing by in observation.
IS THE $2K PRICE THE BOTTOM FOR ETH IN THIS CYCLE?
If you buy on every rise $ETH up around $2.7K after being rejected by the 200-day EMA line, the reality is that you are becoming liquidity for others to exit their positions.
I can overlook one rejection at the 200-day EMA, but three consecutive rejections cannot be considered random anymore.
For me, the 200-day EMA line of ETH is the crucial level that determines the success or failure of the trend, and currently we have just received a very clear rejection signal at this level.
I can overlook one rejection at the 200-day EMA, but three consecutive rejections cannot be considered random anymore.
For me, the 200-day EMA line of ETH is the crucial level that determines the success or failure of the trend, and currently we have just received a very clear rejection signal at this level.
What can Vanar Chain benefit from in the next bull run?
If looking @Vanarchain in the context of a new bull run, I think the question is not whether the price will increase or not, but what this ecosystem has to maintain cash flow and attention longer than a FOMO wave.
After a few cycles, I learned that a bull run always brings opportunities for every chain, but only a few actually capitalize on it to transition from 'narrative' to 'usage'.
With Vanar Chain, the biggest advantage in the next bull run lies in the fact that they are not just selling an infrastructure story, but positioning themselves at the intersection of Web3, gaming, entertainment, and mass user experience.
After a few cycles, I learned that a bull run always brings opportunities for every chain, but only a few actually capitalize on it to transition from 'narrative' to 'usage'.
With Vanar Chain, the biggest advantage in the next bull run lies in the fact that they are not just selling an infrastructure story, but positioning themselves at the intersection of Web3, gaming, entertainment, and mass user experience.
SAFU FUND UPDATE – PROTECTING USER ASSETS AT BINANCE
What is the SAFU Fund?
The User Asset Protection Fund (SAFU) is a fund established by Binance in July 2018 to protect users' assets. When establishing the fund, Binance allocated a portion of transaction fees to significantly grow the fund to protect users.
As of February 2026, the SAFU fund wallet includes cryptocurrency assets valued at approximately 1 billion US dollars. The composition of the tokens in the SAFU fund wallet may be adjusted over time depending on Binance's decisions.
The User Asset Protection Fund (SAFU) is a fund established by Binance in July 2018 to protect users' assets. When establishing the fund, Binance allocated a portion of transaction fees to significantly grow the fund to protect users.
As of February 2026, the SAFU fund wallet includes cryptocurrency assets valued at approximately 1 billion US dollars. The composition of the tokens in the SAFU fund wallet may be adjusted over time depending on Binance's decisions.
Login to explore more contents