Now talking about ecology, most start with 'incentive mechanisms.' Subsidizing users, subsidizing developers, subsidizing LPs, subsidizing nodes, and even KOL promotions can be counted as incentives.
But the question is: what happens after these subsidies run out?
You'll find that many projects collectively 'run away' once the chain subsidies stop, leaving behind hundreds of contracts and a bunch of unused interfaces. Because from the very beginning, the projects weren't about 'wanting to make a product,' but rather 'wanting to grab subsidies.'
This is not a problem with the project; it's that the chain fundamentally hasn't provided the soil for the project to 'survive.'
But I saw a very special ecological structure on
@Plasma : it's not about being fed by external resources, but about attracting projects to stay through the 'settlement capacity of the chain itself.'