cryptoassetsportfolio

There are many criteria to consider while selecting a cryptocurrency asset. I'll go over all of the other criteria you should consider when choosing which cryptocurrency to add to your #CryptoAssetsPortfolio in the following posts.
Here is one of my strategies for selecting a crypto asset to add to my portfolio, which is called the #CostEfficientMethod (the CE method).
The strategy is as follows: purchase an inexpensive cryptocurrency that has the potential to grow steadily.
I put assets into two categories: those costing more than 1 USDC and those costing less than 1 USDC, as well as those costing more than or less than 0.000001 USDC.
$BTC
The concept behind this is that with a #TinyInvestment you can purchase a large number of coins and still have good return on investment. Because it takes longer time for a coin to rise from a nominal price of $100 to $1,000 than it does for a coin with a nominal price of $0.000001 to rise to $0.00001.
Again, it takes less time for a cryptocurrency's price to rise from $0.000000001 to $0.0000001 than it does from $0.000001 to $0.00001. In any case, it provides the same 10x return on investment.
It is comparable to mining Bitcoin; mining BTC from 0.000000001 to 0.0000001 takes less time than mining BTC from 0.0001 to 0.0002.
In a worst-case scenario, I am losing a small amount of capital, and vice versa, at the least, I will gain 10x on average.
$XEC
In my instance, I purchased XEC at the market price of about $0.000008. Unlike projects that cost more than $10 or $100 per coin or token, such projects can easily yield 10x. In addition, if I set my target price at $1 (1 000 000x) and then $10 (10 000 000x) per coin/token, it will easily earn me the annual salary of a starting scientist and on average the annual salary of a professor at the leading universities in the USA, respectively.
So I bought a significant amount of XEC for a small investment. However, you can choose any other cryptocurrency using the CE method!
What else should you consider? The older the asset, the more stable and reliable it is. However, if its price has been declining or hasn't changed much in years, it is not a positive sign; this indicates that this asset has no potential.
In the instance of XEC, the chart implies that its value is declining. Nevertheless, there is nothing risky about a little capital to hold ten thousand tokens and keep an eye on them for a few years.
$ETH
In addition, just to let you know, I had to select between XEC and another crypto that was younger, but I chose XEC since I like the project and the name. In the financial world, selecting an asset based on its name may not seem good. But it's my decision. And I do not advise you to do so.
And, XEC was purchased with payment I received from the Write to Earn Binance Square.
This is the first step toward becoming a millionaire starting with zero investment, and you're witnessing it!
🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋
Other than my time, which I anyway devote to writing and study, and my knowledge, I didn't invest any money. Just wanted to share my work with you. Win-win!
Always "DYOR"
@eCash
#FedRateCut #Write2Earn!

The third question is to users: “You dig everything you can!”. You bother influencers and developers with mean questions and are ready to scream the project is a dishonest scam. Then, how could you not warn everyone on the planet, including me, that the project was a shitty #ScamProject and everyone knew it except the new user and me!
As of January 2026, 13 million projects being classified as inactive. According to different resource, nearly 53% - 66.5% of cryptos launched since 2021 have failed.
Example of potentially #failingprojects that are actually also in my #CryptoAssetsPortfolio : $Babydoge, $Lunc, $Hex, $Worldcoin.
$WLD
The fourth group of participants includes #ITgiants like Google, Microsoft, Intel, YouTube, Facebook etc., and a local cybersecurity authority. It's a separate topic. I will not discuss them in this post.
So, my approach is let’s reduce the number of fraudulent projects and increase the number of outstanding projects so that we can accurately identify and probabilistically select the best project. Could we establish some #criteria that would allow us to distinguish between projects that are scams and those that are not scams but decent initiatives?
$BTC
The alternative I have found for myself in the meantime is that it is better not to participate in any projects at all, even if they are amazing, give 1000x gains, and are 100% not a scam!
Instead, it's better to wait until the project is listed on an exchange and can be sustained for at least a few years. Until then, I can exchange or trade that asset.
$ETH