clarity_act

Officials from the White House and the U.S. Treasury agreed that the legislative period known as the “lame duck session” following the midterm elections does not hold enough promise to revive the Digital Assets Clarity Act (Clarity Act), and that the focus should now shift to the ongoing work by U.S. market regulators.

The CLARITY law is stuck.. Why should the crypto market care?
Guys, this is one of the most important stories in crypto right now and you shouldn’t ignore it.
Everyone is focused on the Bitcoin and Ethereum charts—where is the next move heading?—but behind the scenes, something big is happening in Washington.
The CLARITY law hit a dead end again.

JPMorgan's CEO says the Clarity Act has serious problems for banks and promises to fight it, while naming Brian Armstrong as the person spending hundreds of millions to shape crypto legislation his way.
Key Takeaways:
Dimon: Clarity Act allows stablecoin deposit-like yields without equivalent banking oversight.Bill cleared Senate Banking Committee May 14 but now faces heavy Wall Street resistance.Dimon calls out Brian Armstrong directly for spending hundreds of millions lobbying Washington.Coinbase counters banks are engaging in regulatory capture to protect net interest margins.Dimon: stablecoin is legitimate payment technology but must face the same rules as banks.
The CLARITY Act cleared the Senate Banking Committee on May 14, 2026. Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, has a message for everyone involved in getting it to the floor: the banks are going to fight it.
Speaking on Fox Business, Dimon laid out his objections clearly. The bill as written allows crypto platforms to pay interest-like rewards on stablecoin balances, functioning like a bank account, without the regulatory framework that actual banks are required to maintain. No equivalent capital requirements. No equivalent liquidity rules. No equivalent AML, Bank Secrecy Act, or KYC compliance standards. A stablecoin issuer gets to do what a bank does without being treated like one.
"The banks will not accept it that way."
His core argument is straightforward. If you take deposits and pay yields, you're in the banking business. And if you're in the banking business, you should face the same oversight as everyone else in that business. The current version of the Clarity Act doesn't require that. In Dimon's view that creates a structural advantage for crypto firms that has nothing to do with innovation and everything to do with regulatory arbitrage.
Why every bank in the country is paying attention
The consequence of that regulatory arbitrage isn't abstract. If stablecoin platforms can offer yields on balances without the overhead of full banking regulation, consumers have a rational incentive to move money out of traditional bank accounts and into stablecoin accounts. The banks bear the cost of compliance. The stablecoin issuers don't. The customer gets a better yield. The math isn't complicated, and the threat isn't limited to JPMorgan.
This is why Dimon was careful to frame the opposition as an industry-wide position. The American Bankers Association, small community banks, and credit unions are all aligned against the current version. "It's not just the big guys," he said. Small banks and credit unions face the same deposit migration risk with far less capacity to absorb it. The bill passed committee with crypto industry support. What it's now running into is the organized resistance of the entire traditional banking system.
Where that resistance is pointing
That organized resistance has a specific target. The person who has been the most visible force pushing the Clarity Act through Washington is Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, who has spent heavily on lobbying and crypto-friendly political campaigns to advance legislation favorable to the industry. Dimon went after him directly on air. "He said he's representing the whole industry. He's full of shit."
The accusation is that Armstrong has been spending hundreds of millions of dollars in Washington to shape a bill that benefits Coinbase's specific business model rather than the industry broadly, and presenting that effort as representing the entire crypto ecosystem. Dimon's point is that nobody elected Armstrong to speak for the industry and the bill he's been pushing would create an unlevel playing field at the expense of everyone operating under existing financial regulation.
Armstrong and Coinbase's response is the mirror image. Their argument is that banks are engaging in regulatory capture, using political relationships to protect net interest margins and prevent competition rather than protect consumers. Crypto advocacy groups have maintained that stablecoin rewards programs are essential to US competitiveness in financial innovation and that restricting them is protectionism dressed up as prudential regulation.
"We'll fight it. If we lose, we lose and we'll live. But it will be fought."
What Dimon actually thinks about the technology
Before drawing the wrong conclusion from all of this, Dimon isn't fighting stablecoins. He's fighting the rules being built around them. That distinction matters.
JPMorgan has been building on distributed ledger technology for years. JPM Coin, its internal settlement system, has been processing institutional transactions since 2019. The bank isn't anti-blockchain and Dimon said as much directly: "I think it's a legitimate technology. I think stablecoin can be legitimate. Payment system."
His personal position is more cautious, he said he personally wants nothing to do with stablecoins and believes that without proper oversight they would "eventually blow up on their own." But he acknowledged that's his personal view and separate from the policy question. On the policy question his position is consistent: stablecoins operating as financial products should face financial regulation. The same AML rules. The same KYC requirements. The same capital standards as any institution taking deposits and paying yields. Not a lighter version designed to give one set of competitors a structural advantage over another.
The fight Dimon is promising isn't just about one bill. The Senate Banking Committee passed the Clarity Act on May 14. What it didn't anticipate was JPMorgan, the ABA, every small bank, and every credit union in the country deciding to treat it as an existential threat worth spending real resources to stop. That's what Dimon is signaling. The markup is coming. The fight already started.
#CLARITY_ACT

For years, the biggest enemy of the crypto market hasn't been the dip... but regulatory uncertainty.
But now, the United States is getting closer to discussing the Clarity Act, a law that might finally define:
Who regulates the crypto market?
What qualifies as a security?
So, what qualifies as a real digital asset?
This could change the game entirely.
Why does this matter?