After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
When I built my first quantitative trading system, I stepped into three pitfalls.
Pitfall 1: Overfitting Backtests looked unbelievably good, but the real trading blew up right after. Reason: I tuned the parameters too closely to historical data.
Pitfall 2: Ignoring trading fees Backtests showed profit of 50 bucks per trade, but after fees in live trading, it only left 15 bucks. Your returns get cut by 70% straight away.
Pitfall 3: No stop-loss logic “Quant systems won’t go crazy and place trades randomly.” Until one time, a market move wiped out 20%, and I realized quant can also blow up.
The SYS series is something I built slowly after stepping into these three pitfalls. No pitfalls, no system.
Overall, this week BTC has shown a high-level consolidation pattern. Trading volume has been gradually shrinking, indicating that both bulls and bears are waiting.
Typically, there are two ways this kind of formation ends: 1. Trading volume suddenly expands → a direction is chosen 2. Continue ranging until an external catalyst appears
My current view: keep observing until the direction becomes clear.
Only once confirmed is the most effortless approach.
Market Weekly Report | What is BTC telling us this week?
Overall, BTC this week has been consolidating at a high level. Trading volume is gradually shrinking, indicating both buyers and sellers are waiting.
This kind of pattern usually ends in two ways: 1. Trading volume suddenly expands → a direction is chosen 2. It continues to trade sideways until an external catalyst appears
My current judgment: Keep watching until the direction becomes clear.
Only after confirmation is it the most low-effort approach.
If you could go back to the first day of trading, what would you most want to tell yourself?
My answer:
“First learn position/risk management, then learn technical analysis.”
Most people do it in the opposite order—first learn candlesticks, indicators, and patterns. In the end you can sometimes see the direction correctly, but you still lose money.
The reason is: you didn’t do proper risk management.
Even if you only have a 60% win rate, and pair it with a 2R risk-to-reward ratio, long-term it will still be a positive expected value.
Many people don’t want to stop-loss, because “as long as you haven’t sold, it doesn’t count as a real loss.”
But the market doesn’t care about your mental account.
A stop-loss isn’t admitting defeat— it’s carrying out the rules you set before emotion took over. You’re not losing to the market; you’re winning a round of self-control.
Only those who can stop-loss can keep surviving in the market. Those who don’t stop-loss will eventually give back all their profits.
The core logic of SYS03, explained in one sentence:
All three EMA moving averages must be aligned in the same direction, and the momentum indicators must confirm at the same time—only then will a signal be triggered.
Why be this strict?
Because I’ve seen too many people enter when they “feel it’s going up,” then watch the direction reverse—yet they keep holding through losses because they “don’t have a clear stop-loss point.”
SYS03’s strict conditions are designed to filter out these “looks-like” false signals.
Do less, but every trade has a reason.
Search for SYS03 on TradingView and you can run your own backtest.
Market Weekly Report | What is BTC telling us this week?
Overall, this week BTC showed a high-level consolidation pattern. Trading volume gradually decreased, indicating that both bulls and bears are waiting.
Typically, there are two ways this formation ends: 1. Trading volume suddenly surges → a direction is chosen 2. Continue moving sideways until an external catalyst appears
My current view: keep an eye on it until the direction becomes clear.
Once confirmed, that's the most effortless approach.
Resistance level: In the 1–2% range above (where there were previously dense trades) Support level: Around 1.5% below (on the uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks the resistance with increased volume → direction is confirmed, and you can follow If it rises on low volume → wait for a pullback to reassess
After trading for so long, I want to ask you a question.
Right now, on your trading journey, what is the biggest obstacle?
A. I can’t understand technical analysis B. I understand it, but I can’t control myself C. There’s no consistency in position management D. Once my mindset takes a hit, I fall apart
Leave a comment and tell me—I’ll definitely see it.
I’m not trying to sell a course. I’m just genuinely curious, and I also want to see where everyone is getting stuck.
Many people don’t want to stop loss, because “as long as you haven’t sold, it doesn’t count as a real loss.”
But the market doesn’t care about your mental accounting.
Stop loss is not admitting defeat— it’s executing the rules you set before you became emotionally involved. You’re not losing to the market; you’re winning by taking control over yourself.
Only those who can set stop loss can keep surviving in the market. Those who won’t will eventually give all their profits back—one day.
In early 2024, BTC saw a surge in volume and rose around 58,000.
A friend of mine checks the charts every day and tells me, “Wait. Wait for the signal to be a bit clearer.”
When it hits 62,000: “It’s moving too fast—wait for a pullback.”
When it reaches 68,000: “Go in after the pullback. No rush.”
When it climbs to 73,000: “I can’t stand it anymore,” and he chased in.
Then BTC started to pull back and fell back to 60,000.
He said he wasn’t losing those amounts of money— what he was losing was: he clearly saw the opportunity at 58,000, but kept waiting for a “more certain signal,” and missed the best spot.
I asked him, “What are you waiting for?”
He said, “For a signal that can’t be wrong.”
I said, “That kind of signal doesn’t exist.”
In trading, “waiting for something more certain” often results in “a higher cost.”
The core logic of SYS03, explained in one sentence:
All three EMA moving averages must be aligned in the same direction, and the momentum indicators must confirm at the same time—only then will a signal be triggered.
Why be so strict?
Because I’ve seen too many people enter when they “feel it’s going up,” only to watch the direction reverse, and then hold on because they “don’t have a clear stop-loss point” and end up getting wiped out.
SYS03’s strict conditions are designed to filter out those “looks-like” false signals.
Do less, but every time has a reason.
On TradingView, search for SYS03 and you can run your own backtest.
Today, several key levels worth watching for BTC 08/17
Current price: $62,838
Resistance levels: In the upper 1–2% range (there was dense prior trading) Support levels: Near the lower ~1.5% (uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks above resistance with increased volume → direction confirmed, you can follow. If it rises on declining volume → wait for a pullback and reassess.
Even days without trading are also a trading decision.