After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
Many people don’t want to stop loss, because “as long as you haven’t sold, it doesn’t count as a real loss.”
But the market doesn’t care about your mental accounting.
Stop loss is not admitting defeat— it’s executing the rules you set before you became emotionally involved. You’re not losing to the market; you’re winning by taking control over yourself.
Only those who can set stop loss can keep surviving in the market. Those who won’t will eventually give all their profits back—one day.
In early 2024, BTC saw a surge in volume and rose around 58,000.
A friend of mine checks the charts every day and tells me, “Wait. Wait for the signal to be a bit clearer.”
When it hits 62,000: “It’s moving too fast—wait for a pullback.”
When it reaches 68,000: “Go in after the pullback. No rush.”
When it climbs to 73,000: “I can’t stand it anymore,” and he chased in.
Then BTC started to pull back and fell back to 60,000.
He said he wasn’t losing those amounts of money— what he was losing was: he clearly saw the opportunity at 58,000, but kept waiting for a “more certain signal,” and missed the best spot.
I asked him, “What are you waiting for?”
He said, “For a signal that can’t be wrong.”
I said, “That kind of signal doesn’t exist.”
In trading, “waiting for something more certain” often results in “a higher cost.”
The core logic of SYS03, explained in one sentence:
All three EMA moving averages must be aligned in the same direction, and the momentum indicators must confirm at the same time—only then will a signal be triggered.
Why be so strict?
Because I’ve seen too many people enter when they “feel it’s going up,” only to watch the direction reverse, and then hold on because they “don’t have a clear stop-loss point” and end up getting wiped out.
SYS03’s strict conditions are designed to filter out those “looks-like” false signals.
Do less, but every time has a reason.
On TradingView, search for SYS03 and you can run your own backtest.
Today, several key levels worth watching for BTC 08/17
Current price: $62,838
Resistance levels: In the upper 1–2% range (there was dense prior trading) Support levels: Near the lower ~1.5% (uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks above resistance with increased volume → direction confirmed, you can follow. If it rises on declining volume → wait for a pullback and reassess.
Even days without trading are also a trading decision.
After trading for so long, I want to ask you a question.
Right now, on your trading journey, what is the biggest obstacle?
A. I can’t understand technical analysis B. I get it, but I can’t control my hands C. Position management has no rules D. Once my mindset takes a hit, everything falls apart
Leave a comment and tell me—I’ll definitely see it.
I’m not trying to sell a course; I’m just genuinely curious, and I also want to see where everyone gets stuck.
In early 2024, BTC saw a surge in volume and rose around 58,000.
A friend of mine watches charts every day and tells me, “Just wait—wait until the signal is a bit clearer.”
When it rose to 62,000: “It’s moving too fast. Wait for a pullback.”
When it hit 68,000: “Go in when it pulls back. No rush.”
When it reached 73,000: “I couldn’t hold it anymore—I chased in.”
Then BTC started to pull back, falling back to 60,000.
He said he wasn’t losing that money— he was losing: the opportunity he saw at 58,000, but because he kept waiting for a “more certain signal,” he missed the best entry.
I asked him, “What are you waiting for?”
He said, “For a signal that can’t be wrong.”
I said, “That kind of signal doesn’t exist.”
In trading, “waiting for something more certain” often turns into “paying a higher cost.”
Why do I trust quantitative systems, not “gut feeling”?
Because feelings can deceive you, but data won’t.
Looking back at my trading records over the past five years: · Two years of trading based on feeling: huge account fluctuations, and my mood too · Three years after going systematized: much more stable—even when I was losing, it was within expectations
Quant trading isn’t perfect, but it accomplishes one very important thing: It prevents “emotions” from interfering with decisions.
Signals come in, I act. No signals, I wait. That’s it.
If you could go back to the first day of trading, what would you most want to tell yourself?
My answer:
“Learn position sizing first, then learn technical analysis.”
Most people do it in the wrong order—learn candlesticks, indicators, and patterns first. You may be able to spot the direction correctly, but you still end up losing money.
The reason is simple: you didn’t do proper risk management.
Even if you only have a 60% win rate, and you pair it with a 2R risk-reward ratio, long term you’ll still have a positive expected value.
Someone said, “I’m always getting liquidated, or on my way to getting liquidated. I just want to learn from you.”
That line made me think for a long time.
Because I’ve walked that same road too. The feeling of resetting to zero again and again, and each time telling yourself, “Next time for sure”—I understand it all too well.
But what he said—“Not that greedy. I just want to learn”— in a market full of leverage dreams, someone who can say that already has the mindset half won.
The real people who can survive in the market were never the smartest, or the most reckless one who always takes big bets.
It’s the one who stays low-key, the one who’s willing to admit when they’re wrong.
If you’re also on the road, leave a comment and tell me which stage you’re stuck at.
During the time I was working as a KOL, I wasn’t actually happy.
Every day I had to produce content that looks “professional.” And when I told the truth—sometimes the direction wasn’t even that clear, but the platform needed you to give “a clear point of view.”
After a while, you wouldn’t know whether you were analyzing, or just performing analysis.
Later, I stepped out and returned to independent trading.
At first, my income was lower, but I could sleep.
Now, every post I share on the plaza is my real observations and trade logs— whether I profit or lose, I put it all out there.
Not many people do things like this, but I think it’s the right way.
Many people ask me: Quantitative trading or manual trading, which is better?
My answer: It depends on who you are.
If you can do: ✓ Rigorously follow stop-loss ✓ Not let emotions affect your decisions ✓ Maintain discipline in the long run
→ Manual trading can also be done well.
But if you find that you: ✗ Often “wait a bit longer” before taking a stop-loss ✗ Add to your position when you win, and gamble to win it back when you lose ✗ Chase when you see others making money
→ You need a system to help keep you in check.
Quant trading isn’t smarter—it’s more disciplined.