Binance Square

BlockViz

Crypto price and market data visualization and simulation website for traders and macro-focused investors. Visit: X @blockviz_xyz or https://blockviz.xyz
6 Sledite
29 Sledilci
59 Všečkano
1 Deljeno
Vsebina
--
$BTC just flashed a classic "death cross" and the doom calls are getting loud again. 📉 If you look at the first chart, the 50 day EMA (orange) rolled under the 200 day SMA (yellow) right after that sharp drop from the mid 90Ks to about 90.5K. That is the textbook death cross setup. But here is the thing: death crosses are usually late. They show up after damage is already done, not before it. So the signal is real, but it is not a crystal ball. So where does the "58K risk" idea even come from? From pure downside math and past behavior. 58K would mean another roughly 35 to 40 percent down from here. That is not impossible in crypto, but it would require a full risk off leg, not just a bad weekend. What the charts are actually saying right now (based on the images): • Price broke down hard and is sitting around 90K (first image). • The 200 day line is now overhead around the low to mid 90Ks, which turns into resistance on bounces. • BTC dominance is still around 54.9% (second image). That usually means alts are getting hit harder, and money is hiding in BTC rather than rotating into risk. • On the longer view, BTC is only about -4% from where it started the year (third image). So this is ugly short term, but it is not "end of cycle" by itself. How low can BTC really go from here? I would think in steps, not one scary number: • 90K area This is the obvious psychological level. If it cannot hold, it invites the next stop run. • High 80Ks to mid 80Ks This is where you often see the first real dip buying if this is just a leverage flush. • Around 80K If we start closing below there, the narrative shifts from "pullback" to "trend break" and that is when the 60s and 50s become a real discussion. My take: the death cross is a warning sign, but the bigger tell is whether BTC can reclaim the low to mid 90Ks and stop making lower highs. If bounces keep failing under that 200 day line, downside targets start to get taken seriously. If BTC reclaims and holds, death cross fear often fades fast. :/
$BTC just flashed a classic "death cross" and the doom calls are getting loud again. 📉

If you look at the first chart, the 50 day EMA (orange) rolled under the 200 day SMA (yellow) right after that sharp drop from the mid 90Ks to about 90.5K. That is the textbook death cross setup.

But here is the thing: death crosses are usually late.
They show up after damage is already done, not before it. So the signal is real, but it is not a crystal ball.

So where does the "58K risk" idea even come from?
From pure downside math and past behavior. 58K would mean another roughly 35 to 40 percent down from here. That is not impossible in crypto, but it would require a full risk off leg, not just a bad weekend.

What the charts are actually saying right now (based on the images):
• Price broke down hard and is sitting around 90K (first image).
• The 200 day line is now overhead around the low to mid 90Ks, which turns into resistance on bounces.
• BTC dominance is still around 54.9% (second image). That usually means alts are getting hit harder, and money is hiding in BTC rather than rotating into risk.
• On the longer view, BTC is only about -4% from where it started the year (third image). So this is ugly short term, but it is not "end of cycle" by itself.

How low can BTC really go from here?
I would think in steps, not one scary number:
• 90K area
This is the obvious psychological level. If it cannot hold, it invites the next stop run.
• High 80Ks to mid 80Ks
This is where you often see the first real dip buying if this is just a leverage flush.
• Around 80K
If we start closing below there, the narrative shifts from "pullback" to "trend break" and that is when the 60s and 50s become a real discussion.

My take: the death cross is a warning sign, but the bigger tell is whether BTC can reclaim the low to mid 90Ks and stop making lower highs. If bounces keep failing under that 200 day line, downside targets start to get taken seriously. If BTC reclaims and holds, death cross fear often fades fast. :/
--
Bikovski
Can we dream for once? 😍 $ADA at 50% of $ETH would be at 5 bucks. +1316% 🚀 Is 50% a stretch or realistic? 🤔 {spot}(ETHUSDT) {spot}(ADAUSDT)
Can we dream for once? 😍

$ADA at 50% of $ETH would be at 5 bucks. +1316% 🚀

Is 50% a stretch or realistic? 🤔
$BTC continues to slump. After a bit of sideways consolidation yesterday, we seem to re-enter a dump phase. $ETH and Alts of course hit even harder. Tariff and war fears weigh on markets. 📉 Question is: for how long? If we go into panick mode like last year April we can drop hard. Back into the 80k range for sure, maybe even have a 7 handle in front? What do you think? 🤔 {spot}(BTCUSDT)
$BTC continues to slump. After a bit of sideways consolidation yesterday, we seem to re-enter a dump phase. $ETH and Alts of course hit even harder. Tariff and war fears weigh on markets. 📉

Question is: for how long? If we go into panick mode like last year April we can drop hard. Back into the 80k range for sure, maybe even have a 7 handle in front?

What do you think? 🤔
--
Bikovski
Polygon vs Optimism 2026 YTD snapshot. • $POL : +36.4% • $OP : +20.6% Peak spread was >> 64.3% But after the massive spike by POL in the second week of Jan, Optimism managed to partially close the gap, such that Current spread narrowed to >> 15.8% 💸 What do you think how the Layer 2s will performe this year? {spot}(POLUSDT) {spot}(OPUSDT)
Polygon vs Optimism 2026 YTD snapshot.

$POL : +36.4%
$OP : +20.6%

Peak spread was >> 64.3%
But after the massive spike by POL in the second week of Jan, Optimism managed to partially close the gap, such that Current spread narrowed to >> 15.8% 💸

What do you think how the Layer 2s will performe this year?
$TRUMP daily returns from 2025. Some ultra strong days, but also a lot of red. If you had held the top 10 trading days you would have been up +870% 🚀 While if you missed them, you'd have been DOWN 98% (!!) 📉 Quite the contrast... {spot}(TRUMPUSDT)
$TRUMP daily returns from 2025. Some ultra strong days, but also a lot of red.
If you had held the top 10 trading days you would have been up +870% 🚀
While if you missed them, you'd have been DOWN 98% (!!) 📉

Quite the contrast...
$SUI getting hit hard by the risk-off mode due to Trumps greenland tariff battle with the EU... 📉 Basically in a straight line it lost over 20cents from 1.77 USD to 1.56 USD, since then it has been trending sideways. Question is will the liquidations breaking support lead to further sell offs? 🤔 {spot}(SUIUSDT)
$SUI getting hit hard by the risk-off mode due to Trumps greenland tariff battle with the EU... 📉
Basically in a straight line it lost over 20cents from 1.77 USD to 1.56 USD, since then it has been trending sideways.

Question is will the liquidations breaking support lead to further sell offs? 🤔
$BTC got smacked today and once more the whales dumping were the cause... 4 billion to be precise. 📉 Reports showed a wave of big selling across major players and exchanges, and the market reacted the way it usually does in a levered tape: fast drop, then forced liquidations. Around $870M in total liquidations were reported, mostly longs, which explains why the move felt so sharp 😅 So can BTC reclaim 97K or do we sink to 90K? How we would get back to 97K: • BTC needs to reclaim the mid 90Ks first and actually hold it, not just wick it • 97K has been a hard ceiling recently, so a clean break needs real spot buying and lower leverage, otherwise it is just another pop that fades • Watch if open interest cools while price rises, that is healthier How we end up at 90K: • If BTC keeps failing below 95K and bounces look weak, sellers stay in control • 92K-ish is the first “line in the sand” support area. If that breaks, 90K becomes the obvious magnet and it can get ugly fast because stops stack there My take: this move looks more like a leverage flush plus big supply hitting the book, not the start of a new bear market. But until BTC can get back above 95K and build higher lows, 97K is a stretch and 90K stays on the table 👀 {spot}(BTCUSDT)
$BTC got smacked today and once more the whales dumping were the cause... 4 billion to be precise. 📉

Reports showed a wave of big selling across major players and exchanges, and the market reacted the way it usually does in a levered tape: fast drop, then forced liquidations. Around $870M in total liquidations were reported, mostly longs, which explains why the move felt so sharp 😅

So can BTC reclaim 97K or do we sink to 90K?
How we would get back to 97K:
• BTC needs to reclaim the mid 90Ks first and actually hold it, not just wick it
• 97K has been a hard ceiling recently, so a clean break needs real spot buying and lower leverage, otherwise it is just another pop that fades
• Watch if open interest cools while price rises, that is healthier

How we end up at 90K:
• If BTC keeps failing below 95K and bounces look weak, sellers stay in control
• 92K-ish is the first “line in the sand” support area. If that breaks, 90K becomes the obvious magnet and it can get ugly fast because stops stack there

My take: this move looks more like a leverage flush plus big supply hitting the book, not the start of a new bear market. But until BTC can get back above 95K and build higher lows, 97K is a stretch and 90K stays on the table 👀
--
Medvedji
Bloody start into the week for $SOL . Falling over 6%, much more than ETH or $BTC BTC. 📉 Fears of a renewed tarriff war between the USA and EU spark the sell-off. Weirdly, the crypto markets didn't react over the weekend even though they were trading... Is the crypto market not mature enough to price in news and has to wait for the stock market to open? Or what is your explanation? 🤔 {spot}(SOLUSDT)
Bloody start into the week for $SOL . Falling over 6%, much more than ETH or $BTC BTC. 📉
Fears of a renewed tarriff war between the USA and EU spark the sell-off. Weirdly, the crypto markets didn't react over the weekend even though they were trading...
Is the crypto market not mature enough to price in news and has to wait for the stock market to open?
Or what is your explanation? 🤔
--
Bikovski
$DASH keeps grinding up. another 12% over the last 24h. While peers like $ZEC were stagnating. But WHY? Seemingly still repercussions from the bad news from the Z-cash side (dev team leaving) combined with the massive break out we saw, i.e. still momentum building. What do you think? How much further to run? 📈🤔 {spot}(DASHUSDT) {spot}(ZECUSDT)
$DASH keeps grinding up. another 12% over the last 24h. While peers like $ZEC were stagnating. But WHY?
Seemingly still repercussions from the bad news from the Z-cash side (dev team leaving) combined with the massive break out we saw, i.e. still momentum building.

What do you think? How much further to run? 📈🤔
--
Bikovski
If $SOL had the market cap of $BNB we would already be back at 230 bucks. 🚀 Question is: why are we not? 🤔 {spot}(SOLUSDT) {spot}(BNBUSDT)
If $SOL had the market cap of $BNB we would already be back at 230 bucks. 🚀

Question is: why are we not? 🤔
$MANA rose only half as much as $SAND over the last days. Does that spell weakness or catchup opportunity? {spot}(MANAUSDT) {spot}(SANDUSDT)
$MANA rose only half as much as $SAND over the last days.
Does that spell weakness or catchup opportunity?
Bitcoin is back above $95K and the timing is not a coincidence. A softer CPI print took some heat out of the inflation story, rate cut expectations perked up, and $BTC immediately caught a bid. Price jumped over 3.5% and is now pressing into the same $95K to $97K zone that has smacked down rallies for weeks. So is $100K back on the table? It is, but only if this move actually sticks. The bull case: • Macro headwind eases, risk appetite improves, and BTC finally gets acceptance above the $95K to $97K ceiling. • If we get a clean close above that zone and a successful retest, $100K becomes less of a meme and more of a magnet. The stall case: • We have seen this movie before. BTC pushes into resistance, everyone gets excited, then it fades as sellers unload into strength. • If BTC cannot hold $95K and slips back into the range, $100K gets delayed and we go right back to chop. The tell is simple: does BTC build higher lows above $95K, or do we get another fast rejection wick. #btc100knext? {spot}(BTCUSDT)
Bitcoin is back above $95K and the timing is not a coincidence.

A softer CPI print took some heat out of the inflation story, rate cut expectations perked up, and $BTC immediately caught a bid. Price jumped over 3.5% and is now pressing into the same $95K to $97K zone that has smacked down rallies for weeks.

So is $100K back on the table?

It is, but only if this move actually sticks.

The bull case:
• Macro headwind eases, risk appetite improves, and BTC finally gets acceptance above the $95K to $97K ceiling.
• If we get a clean close above that zone and a successful retest, $100K becomes less of a meme and more of a magnet.

The stall case:
• We have seen this movie before. BTC pushes into resistance, everyone gets excited, then it fades as sellers unload into strength.
• If BTC cannot hold $95K and slips back into the range, $100K gets delayed and we go right back to chop.

The tell is simple: does BTC build higher lows above $95K, or do we get another fast rejection wick.

#btc100knext?
--
Bikovski
$SAND Sandbox revival. Up over 25% in the last 24hours, showing real strength. Like $AXS back from the dead? Indeed the reasons are similar: - mainly the technical break-out , leading to follow-up momentum - as well as the overall sector rotation towards metaverse, accompanied by real volume increase. Question is: how long will it last? 🤔 {spot}(SANDUSDT)
$SAND Sandbox revival. Up over 25% in the last 24hours, showing real strength. Like $AXS back from the dead?
Indeed the reasons are similar:
- mainly the technical break-out , leading to follow-up momentum
- as well as the overall sector rotation towards metaverse, accompanied by real volume increase.

Question is: how long will it last? 🤔
--
Bikovski
$AXS pumping so hard, it is breaking out of its Bollinger Bands! 🚀 Hot stuff. But why? two main reasons: (1) strategic shift to LESS token inflation paired with (2) the technical breakout creating massive momentum that is being piled on by traders. How high can Axie go? 🤔 {spot}(AXSUSDT)
$AXS pumping so hard, it is breaking out of its Bollinger Bands!
🚀 Hot stuff. But why?
two main reasons:
(1) strategic shift to LESS token inflation
paired with
(2) the technical breakout creating massive momentum that is being piled on by traders.

How high can Axie go? 🤔
Crazy moves by $ZEC and $DASH over the last 90 days. Both had significant pumps and dumps, but not equally. DASH +74.5% vs ZEC +66.1%. DASH suddenly caught up and overtook ZEC in the last days. 🚀🤔 Does this continue? {spot}(DASHUSDT)
Crazy moves by $ZEC and $DASH over the last 90 days.
Both had significant pumps and dumps, but not equally.
DASH +74.5% vs ZEC +66.1%.
DASH suddenly caught up and overtook ZEC in the last days. 🚀🤔

Does this continue?
--
Bikovski
$ETH at 50% of $BTC 's market cap = $7,908 (+140%). Where do you personally cap it: 50% is too high, too low, or fair? {spot}(BTCUSDT) {spot}(ETHUSDT)
$ETH at 50% of $BTC 's market cap = $7,908 (+140%).

Where do you personally cap it: 50% is too high, too low, or fair?
Does Crypto Seasonality Exist? Yes, But Not in the Way Most People Think{spot}(BTCUSDT) {spot}(ETHUSDT) Seasonality is one of the most frequently cited and least rigorously understood concepts in crypto markets. You have likely seen claims such as “Q4 is always bullish,” “September is weak,” or “Bitcoin rallies in Up-tober.” Some of these statements are directionally true. Many are misleading. Almost all are incomplete without context. Using long-term BTC and ETH seasonality heatmaps, both monthly and quarterly, a clearer picture emerges: crypto does exhibit seasonal tendencies, but those tendencies are highly conditional on market regime and cycle position. What the Data Actually Shows When you aggregate returns by month or quarter across many years, patterns do appear. For Bitcoin: Q4 has historically delivered the strongest average returns.November and December stand out across multiple bull cycles.Q2 tends to be more mixed, with frequent drawdowns in late-cycle or bear phases. For Ethereum: Returns are more volatile, but the same broad structure appears.Explosive Q4 performance clusters in specific years rather than evenly across time.Weakness is often concentrated mid-year during risk-off phases. The key point is this: seasonality exists in the data, but it is unevenly distributed across years. The heatmaps make this obvious. Strong months cluster together. Weak months cluster together. This is not how classical seasonality behaves in mature asset classes. Which leads to the real driver. Seasonality vs the 4-Year Crypto Cycle Most of what people call “crypto seasonality” is actually cycle-conditioned behavior. The 4-year cycle, anchored loosely around Bitcoin halvings and liquidity expansion, dominates return distributions. It creates long regimes of accumulation, expansion, speculation, and contraction. Seasonality does not override this cycle. It is filtered through it. In post-halving expansion years, seasonal strength becomes amplified.In late bull or bear years, the same calendar months often underperform or reverse.Averaging across all years blends fundamentally different regimes into a single number. This is why statements like “Q4 is bullish” feel true but fail as standalone rules. Q4 is bullish in expansionary phases, not universally. Crypto winter and crypto summer are useful metaphors, but they describe cycle phases, not calendar certainty. Why Seasonal Averages Can Be Misleading Seasonal averages hide three structural realities of crypto markets: Returns are extremely concentrated A small number of months and quarters drive the majority of multi-year performance. This is visible in both $BTC and $ETH heatmaps, where a handful of periods dominate cumulative returns.Regime dependency matters more than the calendar The same month behaves very differently depending on whether liquidity is expanding or contracting.Volatility distorts intuition High volatility amplifies both upside and downside, making coincidental alignment with calendar periods look like causation. Seasonality without regime awareness becomes narrative fitting. What Seasonality Is Actually Useful For Seasonality is not a timing signal. It is a contextual lens. Used correctly, it helps with: Setting expectations around volatility and dispersionUnderstanding why certain months feel emotionally harder to hold throughStress-testing narratives like “this always happens in X month”Comparing different assets across similar calendar windows Used incorrectly, it leads to overconfident positioning and fragile strategies. A Practical Framework A more robust way to think about crypto seasonality is hierarchical: Cycle first Where are we in the broader expansion or contraction cycle?Regime second Is liquidity tightening or loosening? Is risk appetite rising or falling?Seasonality last Within this regime, how have calendar periods tended to behave historically? When seasonality aligns with cycle direction, it can reinforce trends. When it conflicts, it usually loses. Key Takeaways Crypto does exhibit seasonal patterns, visible in long-term monthly and quarterly return data.These patterns are not stable across time and are heavily conditioned by the 4-year cycle.What looks like seasonality is often cyclicality expressed through the calendar.Seasonal averages are descriptive, not predictive.The real value lies in understanding context, not chasing dates. Seasonality exists in crypto. Just not as a rulebook. Sources: https://blockviz.xyz/price/seasonality

Does Crypto Seasonality Exist? Yes, But Not in the Way Most People Think


Seasonality is one of the most frequently cited and least rigorously understood concepts in crypto markets.
You have likely seen claims such as “Q4 is always bullish,” “September is weak,” or “Bitcoin rallies in Up-tober.” Some of these statements are directionally true. Many are misleading. Almost all are incomplete without context.
Using long-term BTC and ETH seasonality heatmaps, both monthly and quarterly, a clearer picture emerges: crypto does exhibit seasonal tendencies, but those tendencies are highly conditional on market regime and cycle position.
What the Data Actually Shows
When you aggregate returns by month or quarter across many years, patterns do appear.

For Bitcoin:
Q4 has historically delivered the strongest average returns.November and December stand out across multiple bull cycles.Q2 tends to be more mixed, with frequent drawdowns in late-cycle or bear phases.

For Ethereum:

Returns are more volatile, but the same broad structure appears.Explosive Q4 performance clusters in specific years rather than evenly across time.Weakness is often concentrated mid-year during risk-off phases.

The key point is this: seasonality exists in the data, but it is unevenly distributed across years. The heatmaps make this obvious. Strong months cluster together. Weak months cluster together. This is not how classical seasonality behaves in mature asset classes.
Which leads to the real driver.
Seasonality vs the 4-Year Crypto Cycle
Most of what people call “crypto seasonality” is actually cycle-conditioned behavior.
The 4-year cycle, anchored loosely around Bitcoin halvings and liquidity expansion, dominates return distributions. It creates long regimes of accumulation, expansion, speculation, and contraction.
Seasonality does not override this cycle. It is filtered through it.
In post-halving expansion years, seasonal strength becomes amplified.In late bull or bear years, the same calendar months often underperform or reverse.Averaging across all years blends fundamentally different regimes into a single number.

This is why statements like “Q4 is bullish” feel true but fail as standalone rules. Q4 is bullish in expansionary phases, not universally.
Crypto winter and crypto summer are useful metaphors, but they describe cycle phases, not calendar certainty.
Why Seasonal Averages Can Be Misleading

Seasonal averages hide three structural realities of crypto markets:

Returns are extremely concentrated A small number of months and quarters drive the majority of multi-year performance. This is visible in both $BTC and $ETH heatmaps, where a handful of periods dominate cumulative returns.Regime dependency matters more than the calendar The same month behaves very differently depending on whether liquidity is expanding or contracting.Volatility distorts intuition High volatility amplifies both upside and downside, making coincidental alignment with calendar periods look like causation.

Seasonality without regime awareness becomes narrative fitting.
What Seasonality Is Actually Useful For
Seasonality is not a timing signal. It is a contextual lens.
Used correctly, it helps with:

Setting expectations around volatility and dispersionUnderstanding why certain months feel emotionally harder to hold throughStress-testing narratives like “this always happens in X month”Comparing different assets across similar calendar windows

Used incorrectly, it leads to overconfident positioning and fragile strategies.
A Practical Framework
A more robust way to think about crypto seasonality is hierarchical:

Cycle first Where are we in the broader expansion or contraction cycle?Regime second Is liquidity tightening or loosening? Is risk appetite rising or falling?Seasonality last Within this regime, how have calendar periods tended to behave historically?

When seasonality aligns with cycle direction, it can reinforce trends. When it conflicts, it usually loses.
Key Takeaways
Crypto does exhibit seasonal patterns, visible in long-term monthly and quarterly return data.These patterns are not stable across time and are heavily conditioned by the 4-year cycle.What looks like seasonality is often cyclicality expressed through the calendar.Seasonal averages are descriptive, not predictive.The real value lies in understanding context, not chasing dates.

Seasonality exists in crypto. Just not as a rulebook.

Sources: https://blockviz.xyz/price/seasonality
$SOL has overtaken $XRP in its Year to Date performance. {spot}(SOLUSDT) While Ripple had a strong start to the year, surging over 30% it came back down and now stands at +11% for the year. While Solana took it slow-and-steady but ultimately overtook XRP and now stands at +14% for the year. What do you think who will prevail this year? 😎
$SOL has overtaken $XRP in its Year to Date performance.
While Ripple had a strong start to the year, surging over 30% it came back down and now stands at +11% for the year.
While Solana took it slow-and-steady but ultimately overtook XRP and now stands at +14% for the year.

What do you think who will prevail this year? 😎
$KAITO dumps as Twitter kills InfoFi. {spot}(KAITOUSDT) Feels related, even if no one wants to say it out loud. A lot of InfoFi only worked because X rewards existed. Not just payouts, but visibility. Tweets ranked, threads surfaced, engagement mattered. Attention was the currency and X was the exchange. Now that rewards are gone, the whole thing looks shaky. If InfoFi depends on being paid for posting on one platform, was it ever really InfoFi or just incentivized content farming? KAITO selling off makes sense in that context. If the main distribution and reward loop disappears, the token narrative weakens fast. You can’t price in “information markets” when the market for attention just got rug pulled. The real question is whether InfoFi can exist without X at the center. Can it move on chain? Can it reward signal instead of engagement? Can it survive without algorithmic amplification? If the answer is no, then InfoFi wasn’t a new primitive. It was a feature riding on Twitter’s incentives. If the answer is yes, this is probably the shakeout it needed. Curious to see which projects were actually building infrastructure and which were just farming impressions.
$KAITO dumps as Twitter kills InfoFi.

Feels related, even if no one wants to say it out loud.

A lot of InfoFi only worked because X rewards existed. Not just payouts, but visibility. Tweets ranked, threads surfaced, engagement mattered. Attention was the currency and X was the exchange.

Now that rewards are gone, the whole thing looks shaky.

If InfoFi depends on being paid for posting on one platform, was it ever really InfoFi or just incentivized content farming?

KAITO selling off makes sense in that context. If the main distribution and reward loop disappears, the token narrative weakens fast. You can’t price in “information markets” when the market for attention just got rug pulled.

The real question is whether InfoFi can exist without X at the center.

Can it move on chain?
Can it reward signal instead of engagement?
Can it survive without algorithmic amplification?

If the answer is no, then InfoFi wasn’t a new primitive. It was a feature riding on Twitter’s incentives.

If the answer is yes, this is probably the shakeout it needed.

Curious to see which projects were actually building infrastructure and which were just farming impressions.
CME is adding futures for $ADA , LINK, and XLM and that is a bigger deal than it sounds. It basically means more regulated ways for funds to get exposure or hedge, without touching spot directly. Launch is planned for Feb 9, pending regulatory review. 🚀 So which token benefits the most? 🤔 My pick is . . . $LINK ! 🚀 Why LINK: • It already sits in the “infrastructure” bucket that institutions understand (oracles, data rails). When tradfi gets a new ticker, they usually start with stuff that feels like picks and shovels. • Futures matter most when there is real hedging demand. LINK has active traders, a lot of spot liquidity, and it is used across DeFi, so hedging and basis trades make more sense here than for a pure hype coin. • LINK has shown clear outperformance since the beginning of the year (see chart below)! ADA will benefit too, but more in a “bigger audience can trade it” way. It has a massive community, and CME access can legitimize it further, but ADA has also had lots of attention already, so the marginal effect might be smaller. XLM is the wild card. It could surprise because it is under-owned compared to the other two, so even a small wave of new access can move it. But it usually needs a stronger narrative spark than just “futures launched.” One caution: new futures do not automatically mean price goes up. Sometimes it pumps on the headline, then chops because traders use futures to short or hedge. Still, longer term it is a positive sign that CME keeps expanding beyond just BTC and ETH.
CME is adding futures for $ADA , LINK, and XLM and that is a bigger deal than it sounds. It basically means more regulated ways for funds to get exposure or hedge, without touching spot directly. Launch is planned for Feb 9, pending regulatory review. 🚀

So which token benefits the most? 🤔
My pick is . . . $LINK ! 🚀

Why LINK:
• It already sits in the “infrastructure” bucket that institutions understand (oracles, data rails). When tradfi gets a new ticker, they usually start with stuff that feels like picks and shovels.
• Futures matter most when there is real hedging demand. LINK has active traders, a lot of spot liquidity, and it is used across DeFi, so hedging and basis trades make more sense here than for a pure hype coin.
• LINK has shown clear outperformance since the beginning of the year (see chart below)!

ADA will benefit too, but more in a “bigger audience can trade it” way. It has a massive community, and CME access can legitimize it further, but ADA has also had lots of attention already, so the marginal effect might be smaller.

XLM is the wild card. It could surprise because it is under-owned compared to the other two, so even a small wave of new access can move it. But it usually needs a stronger narrative spark than just “futures launched.”

One caution: new futures do not automatically mean price goes up. Sometimes it pumps on the headline, then chops because traders use futures to short or hedge. Still, longer term it is a positive sign that CME keeps expanding beyond just BTC and ETH.
Prijavite se, če želite raziskati več vsebin
Raziščite najnovejše novice o kriptovalutah
⚡️ Sodelujte v najnovejših razpravah o kriptovalutah
💬 Sodelujte z najljubšimi ustvarjalci
👍 Uživajte v vsebini, ki vas zanima
E-naslov/telefonska številka

Najnovejše novice

--
Poglejte več
Zemljevid spletišča
Nastavitve piškotkov
Pogoji uporabe platforme