S E L E N E
12.3k Posts
S E L E N E
Square Verified+Turning Volatility Into Opportunity 📈🚀
671 Following
32.6K+ Followers
28.4K+ Liked
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Live
PINNED
Verified
DUSKS IS EVOLVING BEYOND THE PRIVACY BLOCKCHAIN
Its focus is becoming clear regulated on-chain finance with privacy auditability and deterministic settlement working together.
The Dusk L1 now combines confidential transfers public accounts ZK smart contracts and fast finality. Meanwhile DuskEVM is bringing Solidity and OP Stack compatibility to the ecosystem giving developers a familiar path into Dusk’s infrastructure.
The bigger story is tokenized finance. Dusk is building toward workflows covering investor onboarding controlled transfers, disclosure payments and settlement not just issuing another token.
Dusk Connect and the new wallet also make it easier for dApps to interact with users.
That’s what makes Dusk interesting to me.
The goal isn’t simply hiding transactions.
It’s making financial activity private when necessary transparent when required, and still verifiable throughout the process.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
$ACE
Its focus is becoming clear regulated on-chain finance with privacy auditability and deterministic settlement working together.
The Dusk L1 now combines confidential transfers public accounts ZK smart contracts and fast finality. Meanwhile DuskEVM is bringing Solidity and OP Stack compatibility to the ecosystem giving developers a familiar path into Dusk’s infrastructure.
The bigger story is tokenized finance. Dusk is building toward workflows covering investor onboarding controlled transfers, disclosure payments and settlement not just issuing another token.
Dusk Connect and the new wallet also make it easier for dApps to interact with users.
That’s what makes Dusk interesting to me.
The goal isn’t simply hiding transactions.
It’s making financial activity private when necessary transparent when required, and still verifiable throughout the process.
@Dusk #dusk $DUSK
$ACE
Privacy auditability
Onboarding transfer
18 hr(s) left
PINNED
Verified
I started looking at Dusk mainly as a privacy project.
But Citadel 2 and Zedger made me look at it differently.
The interesting part isn’t just hiding identity.
It’s being able to prove that an investor is eligible without putting their personal information onchain.
Citadel 2 uses zero-knowledge proofs to verify credentials while keeping the underlying identity private.
And Zedger takes that idea into a much bigger space: securities, tokenized assets, dividends, minting, burning and compliance.
That combination caught my attention.
Because real financial markets don’t only need privacy. They need rules, verification and accountability too.
So maybe the bigger Dusk thesis isn’t simply private blockchain.
It’s regulated finance without making every user’s identity public.
That’s a much more interesting direction for $DUSK
#Dusk
@Dusk
$COTI
But Citadel 2 and Zedger made me look at it differently.
The interesting part isn’t just hiding identity.
It’s being able to prove that an investor is eligible without putting their personal information onchain.
Citadel 2 uses zero-knowledge proofs to verify credentials while keeping the underlying identity private.
And Zedger takes that idea into a much bigger space: securities, tokenized assets, dividends, minting, burning and compliance.
That combination caught my attention.
Because real financial markets don’t only need privacy. They need rules, verification and accountability too.
So maybe the bigger Dusk thesis isn’t simply private blockchain.
It’s regulated finance without making every user’s identity public.
That’s a much more interesting direction for $DUSK
#Dusk
@Dusk
$COTI
$PAXG stabilizing around key support near $4,360 following a sharp pullback from recent highs.
Reclaiming short-term moving averages sets up a high-probability bounce toward upper resistance levels.
Entry: 4,360 – 4,368
TP1: 4,395
TP2: 4,415
TP3: 4,430
Stop Loss: 4,345
#PAXG
Reclaiming short-term moving averages sets up a high-probability bounce toward upper resistance levels.
Entry: 4,360 – 4,368
TP1: 4,395
TP2: 4,415
TP3: 4,430
Stop Loss: 4,345
#PAXG
$BLUAI consolidating near local support after a massive rally toward the $0.0344 peak.
Holding firm above the key $0.0262 support zone sets up a solid risk-to-reward for the next leg up.
Entry: 0.02750 – 0.02870
TP1: 0.03160
TP2: 0.03440
TP3: 0.03800
Stop Loss: 0.02580
#BLUA
Holding firm above the key $0.0262 support zone sets up a solid risk-to-reward for the next leg up.
Entry: 0.02750 – 0.02870
TP1: 0.03160
TP2: 0.03440
TP3: 0.03800
Stop Loss: 0.02580
#BLUA
Babylon’s recent progress made me look beyond the headline numbers.
Faster vault creation is obviously a better user experience, but speed can change user behavior too. When entering a vault becomes almost frictionless, participation can rise without necessarily telling us whether users are committed for the long term.
The same applies to redemption mechanics. A three-day waiting period may seem insignificant during normal market conditions, but its impact becomes much more relevant when liquidity tightens, rates increase, or multiple users exit simultaneously. Small costs can quickly become meaningful when margins are already thin.
Then there’s the Baby question.
Bitcoin provides the economic security, but governance remains with BABY holders and delegates. That separation is understandable from a protocol-design perspective, yet it creates an important distinction between contributing capital to the network and having influence over its direction.
For me, the next phase isn’t just about attracting more BTC.
It’s about proving that BTC participation, protocol activity, and $BABY demand can reinforce each other sustainably.
#baby
@BabylonLabs_io
$ASMLB
Can Babylon turn BTC growth into sustainable $BABY demand?
Faster vault creation is obviously a better user experience, but speed can change user behavior too. When entering a vault becomes almost frictionless, participation can rise without necessarily telling us whether users are committed for the long term.
The same applies to redemption mechanics. A three-day waiting period may seem insignificant during normal market conditions, but its impact becomes much more relevant when liquidity tightens, rates increase, or multiple users exit simultaneously. Small costs can quickly become meaningful when margins are already thin.
Then there’s the Baby question.
Bitcoin provides the economic security, but governance remains with BABY holders and delegates. That separation is understandable from a protocol-design perspective, yet it creates an important distinction between contributing capital to the network and having influence over its direction.
For me, the next phase isn’t just about attracting more BTC.
It’s about proving that BTC participation, protocol activity, and $BABY demand can reinforce each other sustainably.
#baby
@BabylonLabs_io
$ASMLB
Can Babylon turn BTC growth into sustainable $BABY demand?
Yes, via utility
67%
Maybe, with ecosystem growth
33%
Not yet
0%
3 votes • Voting closed
JUST IN : The Fed will inject $8.6 billion into the market this week.
The Fed has now added $212 billion to the economy since ending QT last December.
#FedRateDecisions
The Fed has now added $212 billion to the economy since ending QT last December.
#FedRateDecisions
$HOME
Entry: 0.00730 – 0.00734
Stop Loss: 0.00715
Tp1: 0.00755
Tp2: 0.00780
Tp3: 0.00810
$HOME
$HD
#Home
Entry: 0.00730 – 0.00734
Stop Loss: 0.00715
Tp1: 0.00755
Tp2: 0.00780
Tp3: 0.00810
$HOME
$HD
#Home
$PEPE
Entry: 0.00000291 – 0.00000294
TP1: 0.00000296
TP2: 0.00000300
TP3: 0.00000305
Stop Loss: 0.00000287
$VIC
#PEPE
Entry: 0.00000291 – 0.00000294
TP1: 0.00000296
TP2: 0.00000300
TP3: 0.00000305
Stop Loss: 0.00000287
$VIC
#PEPE
$WBETH
Entry: 2,048.00 – 2,055.00
TP1: 2,062.00
TP2: 2,069.00
TP3: 2,080.00
Stop Loss: 2,035.00
$WBETH
$VIC
#WBETH
Entry: 2,048.00 – 2,055.00
TP1: 2,062.00
TP2: 2,069.00
TP3: 2,080.00
Stop Loss: 2,035.00
$WBETH
$VIC
#WBETH
The more I look into @BabylonLabs_io the more I think the real challenge isn’t simply making BTC useful.
It’s doing that without slowly adding back the trust assumptions Bitcoin was designed to avoid.
Native BTC borrowing is a good example. Keeping BTC on Bitcoin instead of wrapping it or moving it through another layer sounds straightforward but the complexity doesn’t disappear. It moves into verification recovery liquidity and how the system handles failures.
The same applies to Babylon’s storage and evidence design. Cutting the data size is useful, but smaller storage doesn’t automatically mean stronger integrity. What really matters is whether the index can still be checked, recovered, and kept consistent when something goes wrong.
That’s the part I’m watching most closely.
For me, the bigger innovation isn’t adding more BTCFi features. It’s reducing unnecessary trust while keeping the system practical enough for real users.
#baby
$BABY
$BICO
It’s doing that without slowly adding back the trust assumptions Bitcoin was designed to avoid.
Native BTC borrowing is a good example. Keeping BTC on Bitcoin instead of wrapping it or moving it through another layer sounds straightforward but the complexity doesn’t disappear. It moves into verification recovery liquidity and how the system handles failures.
The same applies to Babylon’s storage and evidence design. Cutting the data size is useful, but smaller storage doesn’t automatically mean stronger integrity. What really matters is whether the index can still be checked, recovered, and kept consistent when something goes wrong.
That’s the part I’m watching most closely.
For me, the bigger innovation isn’t adding more BTCFi features. It’s reducing unnecessary trust while keeping the system practical enough for real users.
#baby
$BABY
$BICO
Lower trust assumptions
100%
⚡ Easy & fast liquidity
0%
verification & recovery
0%
2 votes • Voting closed
Log in to explore more content