10alive
Otvorený obchod
Častý obchodník
Počet rokov: 3.9
46 Sledované
34 Sledovatelia
27 Páči sa mi
0 Zdieľané
Príspevky
Portfólio
Všetko
Citácie
FOGO Price Holds $0.027 Support as Trading Remains Range-Bound Below Key Resistance
#FOGO #LOGO It is worth noting that FOGO is above the support level of the price of above the $0.027 mark, hence limiting the downward movement in the ongoing consolidation process.
But price is still fixed lower than the resistance at $0.03405, which means that FOGO is limited in a close-term trading range.
In the meantime, BTC pair movement is changing by 4.6 percent, which reveals additional cross-market activity and stable spot pricing.
FOGO will still be trading in a narrow price range since activity in the market revolves around the $0.02-$0.03 range. The price action is also closely observed since the asset is consolidating over a well-defined support zone. It is noteworthy that this stabilization is preceded by increased volatility in the previous part of the trading cycle that redefined the short-term positioning and liquidity behavior.
FOGO Price Action Anchors Above $0.027 Support
According to recent trading data, FOGO has maintained a strength of price above the support level of $0.027 that is still holding its price downward. Nevertheless, the price progress is still limited to the possible increase to the price of $0.03405, which limits the asset to a small 24-hour range.
This organization emphasizes regular collaboration between buyers and sellers within pre-defined limits. In the meantime, FOGO increased by 2.4% which indicated short-term upward pressure without breaking resistance. In parallel, BTC-denominated movement shows 0.063144 BTC, alongside a 4.6% change, underscoring cross-pair activity during the session.
Short-Term Trading Range Reflects Controlled Volatility
While volatility remains present, price behavior shows measured movement rather than sharp expansion. FOGO continues to rotate within the $0.02–$0.03 range, suggesting an active consolidation phase. However, price has not demonstrated sustained momentum beyond immediate resistance.
$FOGO spot analysis ✅It’s planning to start reversal in between 0.02-0.03$ and then it could reach 0.06-0.1$ in long term hold pic.twitter.com/4C9QZnI1qZ
— Crypto GVR (@GVRCALLS) January 20, 2026
This structure keeps attention focused on range boundaries rather than directional breakouts. Additionally, the consistent defense of support indicates continued market participation at current levels. As a result, price stability has become the dominant feature of the latest trading window.
Longer-Term Price Zones Remain Technically Defined
In addition to intraday movement, larger references of prices are retained. The longer-term price zones on the market data are between $0.06 and$ 0.10 and are still used as reference points in history. Nevertheless, the price action is still lower than those levels. Thus, short-term orientation remains pegged on prevailing support and resistance rates.
Notably, price behavior within the current band continues to define market structure. As trading progresses, these technical levels maintain relevance in shaping observed price movement and liquidity flow.
#Crypto market cryptocurrency #FOGO
But price is still fixed lower than the resistance at $0.03405, which means that FOGO is limited in a close-term trading range.
In the meantime, BTC pair movement is changing by 4.6 percent, which reveals additional cross-market activity and stable spot pricing.
FOGO will still be trading in a narrow price range since activity in the market revolves around the $0.02-$0.03 range. The price action is also closely observed since the asset is consolidating over a well-defined support zone. It is noteworthy that this stabilization is preceded by increased volatility in the previous part of the trading cycle that redefined the short-term positioning and liquidity behavior.
FOGO Price Action Anchors Above $0.027 Support
According to recent trading data, FOGO has maintained a strength of price above the support level of $0.027 that is still holding its price downward. Nevertheless, the price progress is still limited to the possible increase to the price of $0.03405, which limits the asset to a small 24-hour range.
This organization emphasizes regular collaboration between buyers and sellers within pre-defined limits. In the meantime, FOGO increased by 2.4% which indicated short-term upward pressure without breaking resistance. In parallel, BTC-denominated movement shows 0.063144 BTC, alongside a 4.6% change, underscoring cross-pair activity during the session.
Short-Term Trading Range Reflects Controlled Volatility
While volatility remains present, price behavior shows measured movement rather than sharp expansion. FOGO continues to rotate within the $0.02–$0.03 range, suggesting an active consolidation phase. However, price has not demonstrated sustained momentum beyond immediate resistance.
$FOGO spot analysis ✅It’s planning to start reversal in between 0.02-0.03$ and then it could reach 0.06-0.1$ in long term hold pic.twitter.com/4C9QZnI1qZ
— Crypto GVR (@GVRCALLS) January 20, 2026
This structure keeps attention focused on range boundaries rather than directional breakouts. Additionally, the consistent defense of support indicates continued market participation at current levels. As a result, price stability has become the dominant feature of the latest trading window.
Longer-Term Price Zones Remain Technically Defined
In addition to intraday movement, larger references of prices are retained. The longer-term price zones on the market data are between $0.06 and$ 0.10 and are still used as reference points in history. Nevertheless, the price action is still lower than those levels. Thus, short-term orientation remains pegged on prevailing support and resistance rates.
Notably, price behavior within the current band continues to define market structure. As trading progresses, these technical levels maintain relevance in shaping observed price movement and liquidity flow.
#Crypto market cryptocurrency #FOGO
Digital gold ? Bitcoin behaves more and more like a tech stock
For years, bitcoin has been sold as an escape route. A rare asset, outside central banks, supposed to shine when the rest trembles. Except that in 2026, the soundtrack changes: at the slightest twitch in tech, bitcoin coughs too. And that is more than a market detail. It is an open identity crisis.
In brief#FOGO
Bitcoin slips from the “digital gold” narrative towards a growth asset, increasingly following tech stocks.
While ETH attracts aggressive treasury strategies, BlackRock pushes tokenization at the heart of DeFi via Uniswap.
At the same time, Polymarket battles in court, indicating crypto is normalizing… while hitting the regulatory wall.
When bitcoin sticks to stocks: the “digital gold” put to the test
The most disturbing observation is not that BTC falls. It’s with whom it falls. Short-term behavior resembles more that of a growth stock than a safe haven like gold.
Why now? Because institutionalization has changed the mechanics. ETFs, desks, “risk-on/risk-off” strategies have placed bitcoin in the same baskets as the rest. When managers reduce exposure to risky assets, bitcoin often ends up in the same bag as tech stocks, even if its narrative says otherwise.
And the current trigger is almost ironic: uncertainties about AI’s impact on software. Software stocks are shaken, bitcoin follows the movement, as if it also wore a “growth” badge. In this setting, gold and silver can go their own way… while bitcoin remains stuck to investors’ mental Nasdaq.
Ether in treasury mode: a bet that doesn’t blink
This shift in narrative is not limited to bitcoin. On Ethereum, another phenomenon is emerging: companies treat ETH as a strategic reserve, with a treasury logic… and a tolerance for chaos.
BitMine Immersion Technologies is a brutal illustration. In the middle of a correction, the company added 40,613 ETH, bringing its holdings to about 4.326 million ETH. We’re talking about a gigantic stock, showing massive latent losses at current prices. And despite that, they double down.
The implicit message is simple: “we don’t trade, we accumulate.” Tom Lee defends a strategy focused on the long term, even if it means enduring drawdowns that hurt the books on paper. It’s not romantic, it’s accounting. And that is precisely what makes the movement credible in the eyes of some investors.
But it also sends a signal to the market: if players accept latent losses of this magnitude to “hold,” then the debate is no longer just technological. It becomes financial, almost sociological: who has the stomach to survive volatility, and who has only a narrative without endurance?
BlackRock on Uniswap, Polymarket in court: crypto normalizes… while fighting
This is where the story gets interesting: while bitcoin behaves like a stock, Wall Street begins to play directly on the DeFi stage. BlackRock has made its tokenized Treasury bond fund, BUIDL, tradable via UniswapX, with access reserved for “whitelisted” actors via Securitize, in a very institutional framework.
The symbol matters as much as the plumbing: a giant of traditional markets pushes an on-chain Treasury product, and in the same move, also buys UNI (amount undisclosed). This is not just tokenization. It is an attempt to install institutional rails at the heart of a protocol born to bypass rails.
And while some build bridges, others prepare for the regulatory shock. Polymarket has taken federal court action against the state of Massachusetts, challenging the idea that a state can restrict its event contracts, arguing that jurisdiction lies with the federal framework (CFTC) rather than a local mosaic.
In brief#FOGO
Bitcoin slips from the “digital gold” narrative towards a growth asset, increasingly following tech stocks.
While ETH attracts aggressive treasury strategies, BlackRock pushes tokenization at the heart of DeFi via Uniswap.
At the same time, Polymarket battles in court, indicating crypto is normalizing… while hitting the regulatory wall.
When bitcoin sticks to stocks: the “digital gold” put to the test
The most disturbing observation is not that BTC falls. It’s with whom it falls. Short-term behavior resembles more that of a growth stock than a safe haven like gold.
Why now? Because institutionalization has changed the mechanics. ETFs, desks, “risk-on/risk-off” strategies have placed bitcoin in the same baskets as the rest. When managers reduce exposure to risky assets, bitcoin often ends up in the same bag as tech stocks, even if its narrative says otherwise.
And the current trigger is almost ironic: uncertainties about AI’s impact on software. Software stocks are shaken, bitcoin follows the movement, as if it also wore a “growth” badge. In this setting, gold and silver can go their own way… while bitcoin remains stuck to investors’ mental Nasdaq.
Ether in treasury mode: a bet that doesn’t blink
This shift in narrative is not limited to bitcoin. On Ethereum, another phenomenon is emerging: companies treat ETH as a strategic reserve, with a treasury logic… and a tolerance for chaos.
BitMine Immersion Technologies is a brutal illustration. In the middle of a correction, the company added 40,613 ETH, bringing its holdings to about 4.326 million ETH. We’re talking about a gigantic stock, showing massive latent losses at current prices. And despite that, they double down.
The implicit message is simple: “we don’t trade, we accumulate.” Tom Lee defends a strategy focused on the long term, even if it means enduring drawdowns that hurt the books on paper. It’s not romantic, it’s accounting. And that is precisely what makes the movement credible in the eyes of some investors.
But it also sends a signal to the market: if players accept latent losses of this magnitude to “hold,” then the debate is no longer just technological. It becomes financial, almost sociological: who has the stomach to survive volatility, and who has only a narrative without endurance?
BlackRock on Uniswap, Polymarket in court: crypto normalizes… while fighting
This is where the story gets interesting: while bitcoin behaves like a stock, Wall Street begins to play directly on the DeFi stage. BlackRock has made its tokenized Treasury bond fund, BUIDL, tradable via UniswapX, with access reserved for “whitelisted” actors via Securitize, in a very institutional framework.
The symbol matters as much as the plumbing: a giant of traditional markets pushes an on-chain Treasury product, and in the same move, also buys UNI (amount undisclosed). This is not just tokenization. It is an attempt to install institutional rails at the heart of a protocol born to bypass rails.
And while some build bridges, others prepare for the regulatory shock. Polymarket has taken federal court action against the state of Massachusetts, challenging the idea that a state can restrict its event contracts, arguing that jurisdiction lies with the federal framework (CFTC) rather than a local mosaic.
Institutional demand and awareness of crypto assets have significantly increased following the intro
Jinse Finance reported that at Consensus Hong Kong 2026, Stephen Mackintosh and Evan Cheng stated that after the introduction of the "Genius Act," institutional demand and awareness of crypto assets have significantly increased, making 2025 a milestone year for institutional adoption. The two pointed out that the inflow of funds into spot bitcoin ETFs, the growth of Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) tools, and the entry of institutions such as Citadel and Jane Street all indicate that traditional finance is accelerating its deployment. In the future, asset tokenization and T+0 instant settlement may drive the integration of TradFi and DeFi.#Follow4more #TradeCryptosOnX #MarketRebound #WhaleDeRiskETH
#fogo $FOGO Vitalik Buterin warns prediction markets as short-term dopamine bets hijack narrative
Vitalik Buterin recently shared a lengthy post on X where he critiqued the current state of prediction markets. His current stance slightly differs from what it was last year, when he claimed it was “healthier” to participate in them than regular markets.
In his post, Buterin expressed concern about the state of prediction markets in their current form. He admitted they had achieved a certain level of success, but that they also “seem to be over-converging to an unhealthy product market fit.
Buterin claims this is happening because they embrace short-term cryptocurrency price bets, sports betting, and other similar things that have dopamine value without any kind of long-term fulfillment or societal information value.
“My guess is that teams feel motivated to capitulate to these things because they bring in large revenue during a bear market where people are desperate – an understandable motive, but one that leads to corposlop,” Buterin wrote.
Buterin’s warning about prediction markets
Buterin believes the space would be better off pushed into a totally different use case: “hedging, in a very generalized sense,” he wrote.
As far as he is concerned, the dopamine-driven bets that seem to be taking center stage now are an unhealthy product-market fit. He believes these bets now dominate substantive uses, putting the space at risk of being captured by uninformed speculation rather than genuine information aggregation.
In the future, he advocates steering prediction markets towards risk hedging applications, for example, tools that can help reduce real-world risks to assets or expenditures.
He had a different opinion last December
While Vitalik Buterin’s thoughts on prediction markets have not changed radically, they are a bit different from how he felt about them as of December last year. At the time, he was clearly positive and defensive about them.
Vitalik Buterin recently shared a lengthy post on X where he critiqued the current state of prediction markets. His current stance slightly differs from what it was last year, when he claimed it was “healthier” to participate in them than regular markets.
In his post, Buterin expressed concern about the state of prediction markets in their current form. He admitted they had achieved a certain level of success, but that they also “seem to be over-converging to an unhealthy product market fit.
Buterin claims this is happening because they embrace short-term cryptocurrency price bets, sports betting, and other similar things that have dopamine value without any kind of long-term fulfillment or societal information value.
“My guess is that teams feel motivated to capitulate to these things because they bring in large revenue during a bear market where people are desperate – an understandable motive, but one that leads to corposlop,” Buterin wrote.
Buterin’s warning about prediction markets
Buterin believes the space would be better off pushed into a totally different use case: “hedging, in a very generalized sense,” he wrote.
As far as he is concerned, the dopamine-driven bets that seem to be taking center stage now are an unhealthy product-market fit. He believes these bets now dominate substantive uses, putting the space at risk of being captured by uninformed speculation rather than genuine information aggregation.
In the future, he advocates steering prediction markets towards risk hedging applications, for example, tools that can help reduce real-world risks to assets or expenditures.
He had a different opinion last December
While Vitalik Buterin’s thoughts on prediction markets have not changed radically, they are a bit different from how he felt about them as of December last year. At the time, he was clearly positive and defensive about them.
Why Alphabet's Free Cash Flow May Remain Resilient Even as the Market Worries .
Alphabet's Capital Expenditure Surge: What It Means for Investors
On February 4, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) revealed plans to nearly double its capital expenditures by 2026, prompting a decline in its share price. Despite this, the company’s robust free cash flow (FCF) is expected to remain healthy, presenting a compelling opportunity for both value investors and those interested in cash-secured short put strategies.
GOOGL shares closed at $322.86, marking a drop of more than 6% from the pre-earnings high of $343.69 on February 2. Nevertheless, the stock is still up 16.9% compared to its three-month low of $276.14 recorded on November 14, 2025.
Related Insights from Barchart
Alphabet Earnings Slide
A deeper dive into Alphabet’s financials reveals why the company’s valuation could be higher than it appears. This analysis explores those reasons in detail.
Resilient Cash Flow Amidst Heavy AI Investments
Alphabet has significantly ramped up its investments in artificial intelligence, with capital expenditures soaring by 95% year-over-year—from $14.3 billion in Q4 2024 to $27.9 billion in Q4 2025. For the entire year of 2025, capex climbed 74% to reach $91.4 billion.
Despite this substantial increase, Alphabet’s free cash flow remained robust, edging up by nearly 1% to $73.27 billion. This resilience is attributed to a 31.5% rise in operating cash flow (OCF) for 2025, and a 34% year-over-year jump in Q4 alone.
These figures are detailed on page 11 of the company’s earnings presentation.
More importantly, Alphabet’s OCF margin saw a significant boost. This improvement is key to understanding why, even with management’s guidance of $175–$185 billion in capex for 2026, free cash flow is likely to remain strong.
Let’s examine this further.
According to the cash flow statement (page 6 of the earnings release), Alphabet generated $164.7 billion in operating cash flow in 2024, which equates to 40.9% of its projected $402.8 billion in 2025 revenue.
As shown in the referenced table, this OCF margin surpasses the 35.8% achieved in 2024. In essence, cash flow as a percentage of revenue increased by 14.2%, even as capex related to AI nearly doubled.
This suggests that further increases in operating cash flow could occur as capital expenditures continue to rise, reinforcing the value of Alphabet’s ongoing investments.
Forecasting Future Cash Flows
Analyst projections indicate that Alphabet’s revenue could grow by 16% in the coming year, reaching $467.22 billion, and by 33% in 2027, hitting $536.27 billion.
Over the next twelve months, average revenue is expected to be around $501.7 billion.
If the OCF margin improves by a similar 14.5% to 46.8%—as it did in 2025—here’s what the numbers could look like:
$501.7 billion × 0.468 = $234.8 billion in operating cash flow
Assuming capex rises to $180 billion, free cash flow would be: $235 billion - $180 billion = $55 billion
By 2027, with a 47% OCF margin: $536.27 billion × 0.47 = $252 billion OCF; $252 billion - $180 billion capex = $72 billion FCF
Although these FCF estimates are slightly below the $73.27 billion achieved in 2025, they demonstrate that Alphabet’s free cash flow could remain solid, especially if OCF margins continue to improve alongside increased capital investments.
For instance, if OCF margins reach 50% and capex holds steady at $180 billion:
$536 billion × 0.50 = $268 billion OCF; $268 billion - $180 billion = $88 billion FCF
Ultimately, concerns about a sharp drop in free cash flow due to higher capex may be overstated.
Investment Strategies for GOOGL
One conservative approach to investing in GOOGL is selling out-of-the-money (OTM) put options. This strategy was discussed in a previous Barchart article from January 13 (“Alphabet Stock Is Still Undervalued According to Analysts - 1 Month GOOGL Puts Yield 2.50%”).
For example, the one-month put option expiring March 13, with a strike price of $305.00, currently has a midpoint premium of $5.93.
This means that by securing $30,500 with a broker, an investor can immediately collect $593 by selling to open this contract.
This equates to an instant yield of 1.944% ($593/$30,500). Even if GOOGL’s price drops to $305.00—a 5.5% decrease from Friday’s close—the effective purchase price would be:
$305.00 - $5.93 = $299.07 (breakeven)
This allows value investors to set a lower entry point (7.36% below Friday’s closing price of $322.86) while earning a yield as they wait.
Alternatively, some may use the proceeds to purchase in-the-money (ITM) call options with longer expirations. For instance, the $305.00 call expiring August 21 has a midpoint premium of $47.13.
By collecting $5.93 per month over seven months (totaling $35.58), most of the cost of the $305 call can be offset, resulting in a net buy-in of $313.55 ($47.13 - $35.58 + $305.00). Note that future put premiums may vary.
This approach enables investors to profit even if GOOGL’s share price remains unchanged at $322.86.
In summary, value investors have several strategies—such as OTM puts and ITM calls—to capitalize on GOOGL’s potential.
On February 4, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) revealed plans to nearly double its capital expenditures by 2026, prompting a decline in its share price. Despite this, the company’s robust free cash flow (FCF) is expected to remain healthy, presenting a compelling opportunity for both value investors and those interested in cash-secured short put strategies.
GOOGL shares closed at $322.86, marking a drop of more than 6% from the pre-earnings high of $343.69 on February 2. Nevertheless, the stock is still up 16.9% compared to its three-month low of $276.14 recorded on November 14, 2025.
Related Insights from Barchart
Alphabet Earnings Slide
A deeper dive into Alphabet’s financials reveals why the company’s valuation could be higher than it appears. This analysis explores those reasons in detail.
Resilient Cash Flow Amidst Heavy AI Investments
Alphabet has significantly ramped up its investments in artificial intelligence, with capital expenditures soaring by 95% year-over-year—from $14.3 billion in Q4 2024 to $27.9 billion in Q4 2025. For the entire year of 2025, capex climbed 74% to reach $91.4 billion.
Despite this substantial increase, Alphabet’s free cash flow remained robust, edging up by nearly 1% to $73.27 billion. This resilience is attributed to a 31.5% rise in operating cash flow (OCF) for 2025, and a 34% year-over-year jump in Q4 alone.
These figures are detailed on page 11 of the company’s earnings presentation.
More importantly, Alphabet’s OCF margin saw a significant boost. This improvement is key to understanding why, even with management’s guidance of $175–$185 billion in capex for 2026, free cash flow is likely to remain strong.
Let’s examine this further.
According to the cash flow statement (page 6 of the earnings release), Alphabet generated $164.7 billion in operating cash flow in 2024, which equates to 40.9% of its projected $402.8 billion in 2025 revenue.
As shown in the referenced table, this OCF margin surpasses the 35.8% achieved in 2024. In essence, cash flow as a percentage of revenue increased by 14.2%, even as capex related to AI nearly doubled.
This suggests that further increases in operating cash flow could occur as capital expenditures continue to rise, reinforcing the value of Alphabet’s ongoing investments.
Forecasting Future Cash Flows
Analyst projections indicate that Alphabet’s revenue could grow by 16% in the coming year, reaching $467.22 billion, and by 33% in 2027, hitting $536.27 billion.
Over the next twelve months, average revenue is expected to be around $501.7 billion.
If the OCF margin improves by a similar 14.5% to 46.8%—as it did in 2025—here’s what the numbers could look like:
$501.7 billion × 0.468 = $234.8 billion in operating cash flow
Assuming capex rises to $180 billion, free cash flow would be: $235 billion - $180 billion = $55 billion
By 2027, with a 47% OCF margin: $536.27 billion × 0.47 = $252 billion OCF; $252 billion - $180 billion capex = $72 billion FCF
Although these FCF estimates are slightly below the $73.27 billion achieved in 2025, they demonstrate that Alphabet’s free cash flow could remain solid, especially if OCF margins continue to improve alongside increased capital investments.
For instance, if OCF margins reach 50% and capex holds steady at $180 billion:
$536 billion × 0.50 = $268 billion OCF; $268 billion - $180 billion = $88 billion FCF
Ultimately, concerns about a sharp drop in free cash flow due to higher capex may be overstated.
Investment Strategies for GOOGL
One conservative approach to investing in GOOGL is selling out-of-the-money (OTM) put options. This strategy was discussed in a previous Barchart article from January 13 (“Alphabet Stock Is Still Undervalued According to Analysts - 1 Month GOOGL Puts Yield 2.50%”).
For example, the one-month put option expiring March 13, with a strike price of $305.00, currently has a midpoint premium of $5.93.
This means that by securing $30,500 with a broker, an investor can immediately collect $593 by selling to open this contract.
This equates to an instant yield of 1.944% ($593/$30,500). Even if GOOGL’s price drops to $305.00—a 5.5% decrease from Friday’s close—the effective purchase price would be:
$305.00 - $5.93 = $299.07 (breakeven)
This allows value investors to set a lower entry point (7.36% below Friday’s closing price of $322.86) while earning a yield as they wait.
Alternatively, some may use the proceeds to purchase in-the-money (ITM) call options with longer expirations. For instance, the $305.00 call expiring August 21 has a midpoint premium of $47.13.
By collecting $5.93 per month over seven months (totaling $35.58), most of the cost of the $305 call can be offset, resulting in a net buy-in of $313.55 ($47.13 - $35.58 + $305.00). Note that future put premiums may vary.
This approach enables investors to profit even if GOOGL’s share price remains unchanged at $322.86.
In summary, value investors have several strategies—such as OTM puts and ITM calls—to capitalize on GOOGL’s potential.
Hims removes $49 weight loss drug from shelves, Novo Nordisk stock rises
Telemedicine company Hims & Hers announced over the weekend that it would shelve plans to launch its $49 compound weight-loss pill after facing legal action from Novo Nordisk and related warnings from the US Food and Drug Administration. In response to this news, Novo Nordisk's shares listed in Frankfurt rose by 4.5% on Monday.
Hims & Hers launched the weight-loss pill last Thursday, with its core ingredient being semaglutide—the same key component used in Novo Nordisk's blockbuster weight-loss and diabetes injections. This move immediately drew opposition from the Danish pharmaceutical company and regulatory authorities. On Saturday, Hims & Hers stated that after “constructive discussions” with relevant stakeholders, they would cease offering this weight-loss product.
Previously, US FDA Commissioner Marty Makary had already stated that there would be a strict crackdown on unapproved GLP-1 compound drugs, which have impacted Novo Nordisk’s pricing power in the weight-loss and diabetes markets. Following this statement, Novo Nordisk's stock rebounded more than 5% last Friday.
Despite the latest price surge, Novo Nordisk still faces enormous operational pressure: on one hand, it must contend with competition from Eli Lilly; on the other, it must directly face the impact of lower-priced compound alternatives. In its full-year earnings report released last week, the company pointed out that it is experiencing “unprecedented pricing pressure,” a comment that directly triggered a 17% plunge in its stock price.
Novo Nordisk’s market capitalization peaked in June 2024, but has since evaporated by nearly two-thirds.
Editor: Li Zhaofu
Telemedicine company Hims & Hers announced over the weekend that it would shelve plans to launch its $49 compound weight-loss pill after facing legal action from Novo Nordisk and related warnings from the US Food and Drug Administration. In response to this news, Novo Nordisk's shares listed in Frankfurt rose by 4.5% on Monday.
Hims & Hers launched the weight-loss pill last Thursday, with its core ingredient being semaglutide—the same key component used in Novo Nordisk's blockbuster weight-loss and diabetes injections. This move immediately drew opposition from the Danish pharmaceutical company and regulatory authorities. On Saturday, Hims & Hers stated that after “constructive discussions” with relevant stakeholders, they would cease offering this weight-loss product.
Previously, US FDA Commissioner Marty Makary had already stated that there would be a strict crackdown on unapproved GLP-1 compound drugs, which have impacted Novo Nordisk’s pricing power in the weight-loss and diabetes markets. Following this statement, Novo Nordisk's stock rebounded more than 5% last Friday.
Despite the latest price surge, Novo Nordisk still faces enormous operational pressure: on one hand, it must contend with competition from Eli Lilly; on the other, it must directly face the impact of lower-priced compound alternatives. In its full-year earnings report released last week, the company pointed out that it is experiencing “unprecedented pricing pressure,” a comment that directly triggered a 17% plunge in its stock price.
Novo Nordisk’s market capitalization peaked in June 2024, but has since evaporated by nearly two-thirds.
Editor: Li Zhaofu
what do you think about this meme coin planck
I also bought some
I'm stack in $PLANCK Alpha Token I bought at $0.189 price cost 47.5$ and now droped Almost -35% 47.5$ To 28.5$ Now 😂 Any Advice Hold Or Sell ? Please Help
Don't panic man , just hold no matter what .
I'm stack in $PLANCK Alpha Token I bought at $0.189 price cost 47.5$ and now droped Almost -35% 47.5$ To 28.5$ Now 😂 Any Advice Hold Or Sell ? Please Help
我是乔治我怕谁
乔治1月份开工
·
--
Optimistický感谢币安，上个月5号到今天9月12号，全部实盘！一个月零7天，100w美金，增长到400w美金，感谢一路见证！
没发过红包发一万美金试试看这个功能咋样，如果好用以后多发！
没发过红包发一万美金试试看这个功能咋样，如果好用以后多发！
U.S. stocks held steady Monday morning, with markets showing zero urgency after back-to-back winning weeks on Wall Street.
According to data from CNBC , Dow Jones futures inched up by 57 points, or 0.13%, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 ticked up 0.14% and 0.21%. Traders stayed cautious as everyone waited for the next Fed signal, but optimism about interest rate cuts still hung over the market like leftover smoke.
Last week closed strong for the three major indexes. The Dow rose 1.7%, while the S&P 500 added 0.9% and the Nasdaq Composite moved 0.8% higher. That makes it the second week in a row of gains for all three.
The S&P and Nasdaq have now logged four out of five green weeks. But the real action came from small-cap stocks, which jumped over 3%, as bets intensified that the Federal Reserve will ease rates soon, despite inflation data trying to say otherwise.
Asian markets climb after summit ends with no ceasefire
Overnight, Asia-Pacific markets mostly climbed, reacting to the U.S.-Russia summit ending without any truce. Japan’s Nikkei 225 made a new all-time high at 43,683.56, and the Topix index gained 0.53%, helped by stronger tech sentiment.
Meanwhile in South Korea, it was the opposite story. The Kospi dropped 1.25%, and the Kosdaq lost 1.52%, weighed down by investor fears over regional earnings and slowing demand from China. It’s in line with an earlier report by Cryptopolitan mentioning that South Koreans are ditching big tech stocks to move into Ethereum.
Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index nudged up 0.19%, and mainland China’s CSI 300 improved by 0.34%. The uptick followed new local data hinting at moderate momentum in industrial output.
See also Ronin returns to Ethereum as layer-2
Over in Australia, the S&P/ASX 200 briefly touched an intra-day high of 8,960 before cooling off, but still closed 0.14% higher. Elsewhere, Singapore reported a 4.6% drop in non-oil domestic exports for July, missing expectations of a 1.8% decline.
#PowellWatch
According to data from CNBC , Dow Jones futures inched up by 57 points, or 0.13%, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 ticked up 0.14% and 0.21%. Traders stayed cautious as everyone waited for the next Fed signal, but optimism about interest rate cuts still hung over the market like leftover smoke.
Last week closed strong for the three major indexes. The Dow rose 1.7%, while the S&P 500 added 0.9% and the Nasdaq Composite moved 0.8% higher. That makes it the second week in a row of gains for all three.
The S&P and Nasdaq have now logged four out of five green weeks. But the real action came from small-cap stocks, which jumped over 3%, as bets intensified that the Federal Reserve will ease rates soon, despite inflation data trying to say otherwise.
Asian markets climb after summit ends with no ceasefire
Overnight, Asia-Pacific markets mostly climbed, reacting to the U.S.-Russia summit ending without any truce. Japan’s Nikkei 225 made a new all-time high at 43,683.56, and the Topix index gained 0.53%, helped by stronger tech sentiment.
Meanwhile in South Korea, it was the opposite story. The Kospi dropped 1.25%, and the Kosdaq lost 1.52%, weighed down by investor fears over regional earnings and slowing demand from China. It’s in line with an earlier report by Cryptopolitan mentioning that South Koreans are ditching big tech stocks to move into Ethereum.
Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index nudged up 0.19%, and mainland China’s CSI 300 improved by 0.34%. The uptick followed new local data hinting at moderate momentum in industrial output.
See also Ronin returns to Ethereum as layer-2
Over in Australia, the S&P/ASX 200 briefly touched an intra-day high of 8,960 before cooling off, but still closed 0.14% higher. Elsewhere, Singapore reported a 4.6% drop in non-oil domestic exports for July, missing expectations of a 1.8% decline.
#PowellWatch
which one sir and I don't mind if you can gift me the five dollar on top of your bal...
I can start with that and with the help of your mentorship.
I can start with that and with the help of your mentorship.
Crypto PM
·
--
Optimistickýgm fam. ♥️
Some Altcoins can pump 50% - 100% today 💭
Some Altcoins can pump 50% - 100% today 💭
Help me understand this, when they say coin is been burnt, will d total supply still remain dsame n from which coin did they burn cos I believe they can't come n the1 have already
Franklin_LFG
·
--
Optimistický$PEPE on 🔥 — 15.4 BILLION tokens burned in just 48H! 🐸🔥
• 8.4B burned yesterday
• Another 7B torched today
That’s massive... but let’s keep it real:
Burns don’t make price go up — buyers do. 💸
So the real questions are:
📈 Is volume surging or flatlining?
🐋 Are whales loading or leaving?
📉 Is this a true breakout or just hype smoke?
Burn = a signal.
Volume = confirmation.
Hype fades. Price sticks to strength.
This move looks bullish...
But is it fuel for a moonshot or just another meme mirage? 🌕🤔
Bullish or bluff? Drop your thoughts below 👇
⚡️Follow for sharp, no-BS takes.
$PEPE
{spot}(PEPEUSDT)
• 8.4B burned yesterday
• Another 7B torched today
That’s massive... but let’s keep it real:
Burns don’t make price go up — buyers do. 💸
So the real questions are:
📈 Is volume surging or flatlining?
🐋 Are whales loading or leaving?
📉 Is this a true breakout or just hype smoke?
Burn = a signal.
Volume = confirmation.
Hype fades. Price sticks to strength.
This move looks bullish...
But is it fuel for a moonshot or just another meme mirage? 🌕🤔
Bullish or bluff? Drop your thoughts below 👇
⚡️Follow for sharp, no-BS takes.
$PEPE
{spot}(PEPEUSDT)
Bitcoin Supply Shock May Be Imminent
Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan recently shared a striking statistic that has caught the attention of the crypto world: while the Bitcoin network currently generates about 450 BTC per day, spot Bitcoin ETFs bought nearly 10,000 BTC in a single day. That’s more than 20 times the daily supply.
This massive demand-supply imbalance highlights a potential supply shock brewing in the market. When demand significantly outpaces new supply, prices often surge — and that’s exactly what many analysts believe could happen next.
With institutional appetite growing and daily production fixed, Bitcoin may already be entering the early stages of its next major rally.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan recently shared a striking statistic that has caught the attention of the crypto world: while the Bitcoin network currently generates about 450 BTC per day, spot Bitcoin ETFs bought nearly 10,000 BTC in a single day. That’s more than 20 times the daily supply.
This massive demand-supply imbalance highlights a potential supply shock brewing in the market. When demand significantly outpaces new supply, prices often surge — and that’s exactly what many analysts believe could happen next.
With institutional appetite growing and daily production fixed, Bitcoin may already be entering the early stages of its next major rally.
$BTC $ETH $SOL
Ak chcete preskúmať ďalší obsah, prihláste sa