$SPCX is right at a key level. The stock is testing the $150 area, which has acted as an important level since its debut. A clean breakout and hold above it could open the door toward $170 next. Recent price action has already shown strong momentum off the lows.
I wouldn't call $170 automatic, though. I want to see $150 turn into support rather than just a quick wick above it.
For me, the setup is simple: Break and hold $150 → $170 becomes the next level I'm watching. If it gets rejected again, I'd rather wait than force the trade.
$BTC has successfully reclaimed the pivotal $65,000 level, signaling a resurgence of bullish momentum.
This decisive move above a key technical threshold triggered significant volatility in the derivatives market, resulting in the liquidation of $263 million in leveraged positions over the past 24 hours.
As #bitcoin stabilizes above this zone, traders will be watching closely to see if this level can hold as a new foundation for the next leg up."
Interesting shift in the way $ETH and $SOL could look over the next few years.
Grayscale estimates that, if proposed changes are implemented, annual supply inflation could fall to around 0.4% for ETH and 1.1% for SOL by 2031.
Lower issuance doesn't automatically mean higher prices, but it does change the supply side of the equation.
And this is something I find interesting from the DeFi side too. As major networks become more supply-conscious, the assets running through their ecosystems could become increasingly important for things like liquidity, swaps and tokenized assets.
That's part of why I keep watching how platforms like STON.fi are connecting TON to a wider range of assets and liquidity through cross-chain infrastructure.
We're moving toward a DeFi environment where tokenomics, liquidity and cross-chain access are becoming increasingly connected. Still early, but the direction is getting harder to ignore.
With the way FOMO has been gaining attention lately, I guess I'm not too surprised by this 👀
FOMO has now surpassed Hyperliquid in 24-hour revenue. That's pretty interesting considering how much attention Hyperliquid has been getting across the market. It also shows just how quickly attention and activity can shift in crypto when a new platform starts catching momentum.
The real question is whether FOMO can keep this up or if this is just another short-term spike in activity. $HYPE
Tesla short sellers are reportedly up around $9 billion this year, two years after #elon Musk said they would be “obliterated.” And then there’s Bill Gates, who was also publicly known for betting against Tesla.
Now I'm curious how much has Bill Gates actually made from the $TSLA short so far? 👀
Interesting how the data keeps pointing in the same direction. Ethereum #ETFs $ETH recorded $6.7M in weekly net inflows, even with the market still moving through different phases.
For me, it's another reminder that the people still here are building and positioning for what this space could become. And this is where I find STONfi interesting.
We're starting to see traditional assets move onto blockchain through things like xStocks, giving crypto-native users access to tokenized stocks and ETFs while staying within a DeFi environment. @STONfi DEX currently supports access to assets such as SPYx, NVDAx, GOOGLx and TSLAx on $GRAM
Ethereum ETFs show growing interest in crypto exposure through traditional financial products.
Tokenized assets take that idea in another direction: bringing traditional markets directly onto blockchain rails.
Still early, but the more I see these two worlds moving closer together, the more interesting the long-term opportunity looks.
Bitcoin's final 929,465 $BTC are expected to take more than a century to mine.
But now I'm wondering... how does quantum computing change that timeline?
Could quantum technology eventually make Bitcoin mining significantly faster, or is the bigger concern actually the security of Bitcoin's cryptography?
A lot can change over the next 100+ years, so it's interesting to think about what Bitcoin will even look like by the time those final coins are being mined.
News like this is exactly why I keep $NVDA on my radar. Goldman is now looking for investors for Nvidia’s $500B AI infrastructure financing initiative, with banks, insurers and asset managers expected to provide much of the capital. Nvidia could backstop up to $125B, or 25% of the potential financing.
For me, that adds another layer to the NVDA trade. It's not just about chip demand anymore there's a massive financing push building around the AI infrastructure needed to use those chips.
That's also where @STONfi DEX tokenized assets/xStocks fit into the bigger picture for me.
Traditional capital is increasingly looking for ways to access new asset classes, while DeFi is building the infrastructure to make traditional assets more accessible on-chain.
I'm watching both sides of that transition closely: AI infrastructure in traditional markets and tokenized assets in DeFi.
$HEMI is back among the top gainers, although I'm seeing some rejection around the current level, so a possible short setup could be forming.
$H on the other hand is showing some strength, and for now I don't see much reason to expect a major dump. On the STON.fi side, the numbers are getting harder to ignore. Recent data puts STON.fi at around 78% of TON DEX swap volume, nearly 5× the next-largest venue, while accounting for roughly 59% of users
But the interesting part isn't just the volume. Through Omniston, STON.fi can connect liquidity from multiple sources for cross-chain swaps, helping users access liquidity beyond a single pool or network.
So for me, these numbers tell a bigger story. STON.fi isn't just processing a lot of TON swaps it is becoming an important part of how liquidity gets accessed and executed across the ecosystem.
And as DeFi becomes increasingly multichain, that execution layer could become even more important.
NEW: Nearly 200,000 $XRP was drained from an XRPL bridge 👀 The bridge lost roughly 199,916 XRP after a software flaw allowed fake deposits to be treated as real ones.
The result? The bridge's XRP reserve was almost completely drained, leaving the bridged XRP on the other side no longer fully backed 1:1. The important part here is that XRPL itself wasn't hacked. The vulnerability was in the infrastructure connecting the two networks.
This is why cross-chain DeFi needs more than just good liquidity and fast execution. The security model behind how assets move between chains matters just as much.
For anyone using bridges or cross-chain assets, I'd be paying attention to: → How the bridge verifies deposits → What actually backs the bridged asset → Whether the bridge is currently operational → What happens if something goes wrong
Cross-chain is clearly becoming a bigger part of DeFi, but incidents like this show why trustless execution, transparent collateral and strong verification are so important.
Moving assets across chains shouldn't just be convenient. It needs to be secure too. #Ripple