Jana Crypto Queen
292 පෝස්ටු
Jana Crypto Queen
චතුරශ්රය සත්යාපිතවාර්තා කරන්න
පරිශීලක අවහිර කරන්න
From mining engineer, ended up building my freedom through Web3.
If you’re here, it means you want more than just hype. You want growth, let's get it.
විවෘත වෙළෙඳාම
ඉඳහිට වෙළෙන්දා
{වේලාව} වසර
41 හඹා යමින්
3.6K+ හඹා යන්නන්
2.6K+ කැමති විය
1 ලාංජනය
පෝස්ටු
ආයෝජන කළඹ
සියල්ල
උපුටා දැක්වීම්
වීඩියෝ
සජීවි
අමුණා ඇත
Technically both USDC and USDT can freeze your assets.
What actually makes USDC grow this fast right now is the GENIUS Act, and we need to get more educated about this now.
The new US rules mean banks and institutions can only hold stablecoins with fully qualifying reserves, and USDC fits.
So big money will keep flowing there by default.
Join me and @yikesqq live on Binance Square this week!
Come learn and have fun at the same time.
Technically both USDC and USDT can freeze your assets.
What actually makes USDC grow this fast right now is the GENIUS Act, and we need to get more educated about this now.
The new US rules mean banks and institutions can only hold stablecoins with fully qualifying reserves, and USDC fits.
So big money will keep flowing there by default.
Join me and @yikesqq live on Binance Square this week!
Come learn and have fun at the same time.
What actually makes USDC grow this fast right now is the GENIUS Act, and we need to get more educated about this now.
The new US rules mean banks and institutions can only hold stablecoins with fully qualifying reserves, and USDC fits.
So big money will keep flowing there by default.
Join me and @yikesqq live on Binance Square this week!
Come learn and have fun at the same time.
10
3
11
374
අමුණා ඇත
Bitcoin went up about 40% in the last three months.
YET Hackers had a big quarter too.
$1.26 billion stolen, and September was the worst month so far...
All the onchain insurance in crypto adds up to about $130 million. Roughly a tenth of what was taken.
Crypto People rarely gets a break 🥹
Bitcoin went up about 40% in the last three months.
YET Hackers had a big quarter too.
$1.26 billion stolen, and September was the worst month so far...
All the onchain insurance in crypto adds up to about $130 million. Roughly a tenth of what was taken.
Crypto People rarely gets a break 🥹
YET Hackers had a big quarter too.
$1.26 billion stolen, and September was the worst month so far...
All the onchain insurance in crypto adds up to about $130 million. Roughly a tenth of what was taken.
Crypto People rarely gets a break 🥹
740
අර්ධ වශයෙන් සත්යයි
$HBAR looking really good!
Here's what happened:
- A company building on Hedera got its AI identity tool listed on IBM's cloud catalog.
- Besides Hedera posted that some of its council members, like Accenture, are part of NVIDIA's new AI agent safety platform
My read: Hedera is still down about 42% over the year, so this is a start of a major bounce.
Bullish news and expecting more to come during this cycle for @hedera @HederaCommunity
$HBAR looking really good!
Here's what happened:
- A company building on Hedera got its AI identity tool listed on IBM's cloud catalog.
- Besides Hedera posted that some of its council members, like Accenture, are part of NVIDIA's new AI agent safety platform
My read: Hedera is still down about 42% over the year, so this is a start of a major bounce.
Bullish news and expecting more to come during this cycle for @hedera @HederaCommunity
Here's what happened:
- A company building on Hedera got its AI identity tool listed on IBM's cloud catalog.
- Besides Hedera posted that some of its council members, like Accenture, are part of NVIDIA's new AI agent safety platform
My read: Hedera is still down about 42% over the year, so this is a start of a major bounce.
Bullish news and expecting more to come during this cycle for @hedera @HederaCommunity
4
4
4.4k
SEC saved us?!
Innovation Exemption is a temporary conditional of 5 years that allows on chain trading of US tokenized stocks 🤔
Bullish?
SEC saved us?!
Innovation Exemption is a temporary conditional of 5 years that allows on chain trading of US tokenized stocks 🤔
Bullish?
Innovation Exemption is a temporary conditional of 5 years that allows on chain trading of US tokenized stocks 🤔
Bullish?
1
1
1
883
The CLARITY Act is dead, for now.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
The CLARITY Act is dead, for now.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
3
517
The CLARITY Act is dead, for now.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
The CLARITY Act is dead, for now.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
Why?
The two sides voting had written more than 600 pages of compromise between them, yet still what broke it was the ethics section, the few pages about whether people in government can hold and launch crypto while they are the ones writing the rules for crypto.
Trump agreed to a version of that language on Sunday, right before the vote, which was big news at the time...
It would bar covered officials and their spouses from issuing or sponsoring a digital asset, make them sell any “significant financial interest” in crypto or move it into a blind trust, let state attorneys general sue to enforce it, and stop exchanges from listing any token issued by one of those officials.
For a moment it looks good, but here is the part, Democrats read it differently.
Their argument was that it blocks new launches yet doesn’t clearly reach what is already in place, and they wanted it extended to large holdings, dependent children and paid crypto promotion.
For context on why that section was the one that mattered:
- Trump’s own financial disclosure in June showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto income for 2025.
- Around $594 million from World Liberty Financial and about $635 million from the $TRUMP coin.
- Besides the fact that crypto was his single biggest source of income for the year, bigger than real estate.
What now?
The SEC and the CFTC keep going with their own rulemaking, which was already happening in the background. That route is slower, narrower, and much easier for the next administration to undo.
The crypto PACs now decide what they do with the senators who voted no, with the election on November 3.
And if the Senate changes hands in November, the next version of this bill gets written in a very different room.
Regardless of how anyone feels about this bill, the part I keep coming back to and failing to move on from is the selfish side of our nature as humans, this was a bill with more than six hundred pages and the whole thing fell apart over the section about themselves.
3
2.9k
When you find out you just bought the top 🥹😂
When you find out you just bought the top 🥹😂
3
274
Just finished participating on @babylonlabs_io AMA on Binance Square!
Great solution for those looking to get their BTC to start working for them.
Will share more later...
Just finished participating on @BabylonLabs_io AMA on Binance Square!
Great solution for those looking to get their BTC to start working for them.
Will share more later...
Great solution for those looking to get their BTC to start working for them.
Will share more later...
2
8
660
Just another day in the office…
Who is locked in?
Just another day in the office…
Who is locked in?
Who is locked in?
3
394
Binance, thanks for letting me be part of this.
We are all Binance
Could only be a truly unique place to let us creators feel this important.
Speechless.
#BinanceSwag
Binance, thanks for letting me be part of this.
We are all Binance
Could only be a truly unique place to let us creators feel this important.
Speechless.
#BinanceSwag
We are all Binance
Could only be a truly unique place to let us creators feel this important.
Speechless.
#BinanceSwag
1
3
589
What an Honor to be featured with so many incredible women in crypto.
What an Honor to be featured with so many incredible women in crypto.
Binance Blog
·
--
What does it take to build a career in crypto as a woman?
For this special feature, we spoke with Randi Hipper (Miss Teen Crypto), JanaCryptoQueen, Hadir Gaber, and CryptoMegan about how they entered the industry, the challenges they faced, the moments that almost made them quit, and what crypto changed for them personally.
📅 June 15
⏰ 2:30 PM UTC
Watch the premiere on Binance Square – save the date.
For this special feature, we spoke with Randi Hipper (Miss Teen Crypto), JanaCryptoQueen, Hadir Gaber, and CryptoMegan about how they entered the industry, the challenges they faced, the moments that almost made them quit, and what crypto changed for them personally.
📅 June 15
⏰ 2:30 PM UTC
Watch the premiere on Binance Square – save the date.
2
3
492
SAVE THE DATE!
SAVE THE DATE!
Binance Blog
·
--
What does it take to build a career in crypto as a woman?
For this special feature, we spoke with Randi Hipper (Miss Teen Crypto), JanaCryptoQueen, Hadir Gaber, and CryptoMegan about how they entered the industry, the challenges they faced, the moments that almost made them quit, and what crypto changed for them personally.
📅 June 15
⏰ 2:30 PM UTC
Watch the premiere on Binance Square – save the date.
For this special feature, we spoke with Randi Hipper (Miss Teen Crypto), JanaCryptoQueen, Hadir Gaber, and CryptoMegan about how they entered the industry, the challenges they faced, the moments that almost made them quit, and what crypto changed for them personally.
📅 June 15
⏰ 2:30 PM UTC
Watch the premiere on Binance Square – save the date.
2
362
තවත් අන්තර්ගතයන් ගවේෂණය කිරීමට ඇතුල් වන්න
Binance චතුරශ්රය හි ගෝලීය ක්රිප්ටෝ පරිශීලකයින් හා එක්වන්න
⚡️ ක්රිප්ටෝ පිළිබඳ නවතම සහ ප්රයෝජනවත් තොරතුරු ලබා ගන්න.
💬 ලොව විශාලතම ක්රිප්ටෝ හුවමාරුව මගින් විශ්වාස කෙරේ.
👍 සත්යායනය කරන ලද නිර්මාණකරුවන්ගෙන් සැබෑ විදසුන් සොයා ගන්න.
විද්යුත් තැපෑල / දුරකථන අංකය
නැගී එන මාතෘකා
USRussiaUkraineTalksReportedlyIncludeLukoilOilDeal
513 views
74 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
#USRussiaUkraineTalksReportedlyIncludeLukoilOilDeal Reports surrounding tripartite discussions involving US, Russian, and Ukrainian interests—and potential sanction concessions or asset restructuring tied to energy giants like Lukoil—highlight a critical shift: geopolitics and global energy security remain deeply intertwined.
If energy agreements enter peace or de-escalation negotiations, it signals that economic incentives and oil market stability could be pivotal leverage points for diplomatic breakthroughs. Whether this leads to sanctions relief or strategic realignment, energy assets will heavily shape the future global order.
$ONE
$PUMP
$VELVET
#DYORAlways
#write2earn🌐💹
Sheemm
·1 කැමත්ත දැක්වීම්
·250 views
BitcoinParesGainsAfterRallyTo$86.5K
29,879 views
118 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්
CerebrasSinksNearly20%OnReportNvidiaToPowerOpenAI
57,460 views
649 සාකච්ඡා කරමින්