FARID PK
1.8k පෝස්ටු
FARID PK
میرے اندر کی گھٹن میرے چہرے کا نور لے گئی، کچھ مسئلے ایسے تھے جو مجھ سے حل نہ ہو سکے
විවෘත වෙළෙඳාම
අධි-සංඛ්යාත වෙළෙන්දා
{වේලාව} වසර
3.5K+ හඹා යමින්
13.5K+ හඹා යන්නන්
3.4K+ කැමති විය
පෝස්ටු
ආයෝජන කළඹ
සියල්ල
උපුටා දැක්වීම්
වීඩියෝ
සජීවි
What makes @Dusk interesting for private-market settlement is not just privacy. It is the point where privacy and finality can work together.
In a tokenized securities trade, delivery and payment both need to become final. The problem is that public settlement can expose clues about who is moving what, how much, and sometimes when. That information can matter in a thin private market.
Dusk approaches this with Succinct Attestation, its committee-based proof-of-stake consensus. Once a block is ratified, finality is deterministic. That gives an application a clear settlement point instead of waiting for probabilities to improve.
Then there is the transaction layer. Moonlight is public, while Phoenix is designed around shielded notes and zero-knowledge proofs. The latter can hide transferred amounts and participants from general observers, while selective disclosure can give authorized parties the evidence they need.
The deeper idea is simple: a regulated market should not have to choose between knowing that a trade is final and keeping the trade discreet.
For tokenized European private securities, that combination could make onchain settlement closer to how real financial markets operate: final when required, private when appropriate, and auditable when regulation demands it.$DUSK $TAC $ESPORTS #dusk
In a tokenized securities trade, delivery and payment both need to become final. The problem is that public settlement can expose clues about who is moving what, how much, and sometimes when. That information can matter in a thin private market.
Dusk approaches this with Succinct Attestation, its committee-based proof-of-stake consensus. Once a block is ratified, finality is deterministic. That gives an application a clear settlement point instead of waiting for probabilities to improve.
Then there is the transaction layer. Moonlight is public, while Phoenix is designed around shielded notes and zero-knowledge proofs. The latter can hide transferred amounts and participants from general observers, while selective disclosure can give authorized parties the evidence they need.
The deeper idea is simple: a regulated market should not have to choose between knowing that a trade is final and keeping the trade discreet.
For tokenized European private securities, that combination could make onchain settlement closer to how real financial markets operate: final when required, private when appropriate, and auditable when regulation demands it.$DUSK $TAC $ESPORTS #dusk
On August 22 an attacker exploited a vulnerability in the Cosmos EVM precompile layer and drained a single account on TAC. We halted the chain at block 24,671,475 to stop it. The defect is not in TAC-specific code. It sits in the shared Cosmos EVM module, and several other chains running that module were hit by the same class of attack within a day.
This was a drain, not a mint. No tokens were created and total supply is unchanged: 2,985,651,403 TAC was moved from one account to another. Only $TAC was affected, and all other assets on TAC are intact.
We are finalising the technical post-mortem and the relaunch plan, and expect to publish both tomorrow. The plan is built to normalize $TAC balances and include all the necessary Cosmos fixes to safely restore the network.
We are working with SEAL 911 and with exchanges on the funds that moved. Updates come only from
Not am not saying this. This is from the announcement team for $TAC #Write2Earn!
This was a drain, not a mint. No tokens were created and total supply is unchanged: 2,985,651,403 TAC was moved from one account to another. Only $TAC was affected, and all other assets on TAC are intact.
We are finalising the technical post-mortem and the relaunch plan, and expect to publish both tomorrow. The plan is built to normalize $TAC balances and include all the necessary Cosmos fixes to safely restore the network.
We are working with SEAL 911 and with exchanges on the funds that moved. Updates come only from
Not am not saying this. This is from the announcement team for $TAC #Write2Earn!
One detail about DUSK that deserves more attention is how privacy is treated as a transaction choice, not a separate privacy layer.
Dusk’s dual model design pairs Moonlight’s public, account-based transfers with Phoenix’s shielded, note-based transfers. Both are built into the DuskDS settlement layer, so an application can reason about transparent and confidential value movement within the same network architecture.
That matters for regulated finance because “private” and “visible” are not always permanent categories. A treasury flow may need public accounting, while an investor transfer may need confidentiality. Phoenix uses zero-knowledge proofs to hide transaction details, while selective disclosure can provide relevant evidence to authorized parties.
The interesting part is the programmable angle: privacy can become part of the financial workflow itself, alongside eligibility, transfer rules, and settlement, rather than being an afterthought.
One current caveat is important: Dusk’s June 2026 Boreas upgrade disabled Phoenix on mainnet. So the dual-model architecture is best understood as a design and protocol capability, not a claim that both models are currently active on mainnet.@Dusk $TUT $TAC #dusk $DUSK
Dusk’s dual model design pairs Moonlight’s public, account-based transfers with Phoenix’s shielded, note-based transfers. Both are built into the DuskDS settlement layer, so an application can reason about transparent and confidential value movement within the same network architecture.
That matters for regulated finance because “private” and “visible” are not always permanent categories. A treasury flow may need public accounting, while an investor transfer may need confidentiality. Phoenix uses zero-knowledge proofs to hide transaction details, while selective disclosure can provide relevant evidence to authorized parties.
The interesting part is the programmable angle: privacy can become part of the financial workflow itself, alongside eligibility, transfer rules, and settlement, rather than being an afterthought.
One current caveat is important: Dusk’s June 2026 Boreas upgrade disabled Phoenix on mainnet. So the dual-model architecture is best understood as a design and protocol capability, not a claim that both models are currently active on mainnet.@Dusk $TUT $TAC #dusk $DUSK
One Lesson From My 6-Year Trading Journey
If you give me just two minutes to read this, I’ll share one lesson from my six-year trading journey that I wish someone had told me when I started.
If you think you can turn $50, $100, or $150 into millions overnight in crypto, that’s not a strategy. It’s a misunderstanding.
Number one: Don’t destroy your money chasing quick profits.
Crypto has huge opportunities, but not every opportunity is worth taking. When you’re starting out, your first goal shouldn’t be making money. It should be learning how to protect your money.
Number two: Build experience first.
Spend a few months learning how the market actually works. Understand charts, risk management, leverage, liquidation, and most importantly, how your own emotions affect your decisions. Following someone else’s trade call isn’t the same as knowing how to trade.
Number three: Only invest what you can afford to lose.
There is no magic investment amount. If you have $1,000, you don’t need to put the entire $1,000 into crypto. Starting small while you’re learning is usually much smarter.
Number four: Stop chasing overnight wealth.
After six years in this market, one thing has become very clear to me: one good trade won’t make you rich, but one reckless trade can destroy your capital.
Before trying to make money in crypto, learn how to survive the market.
Learn first. Earn later. That’s the real game.
And advice it's a good time to invest in $BTC
Please your own research then trade take care
$BTC
#Write2Earn!
If you give me just two minutes to read this, I’ll share one lesson from my six-year trading journey that I wish someone had told me when I started.
If you think you can turn $50, $100, or $150 into millions overnight in crypto, that’s not a strategy. It’s a misunderstanding.
Number one: Don’t destroy your money chasing quick profits.
Crypto has huge opportunities, but not every opportunity is worth taking. When you’re starting out, your first goal shouldn’t be making money. It should be learning how to protect your money.
Number two: Build experience first.
Spend a few months learning how the market actually works. Understand charts, risk management, leverage, liquidation, and most importantly, how your own emotions affect your decisions. Following someone else’s trade call isn’t the same as knowing how to trade.
Number three: Only invest what you can afford to lose.
There is no magic investment amount. If you have $1,000, you don’t need to put the entire $1,000 into crypto. Starting small while you’re learning is usually much smarter.
Number four: Stop chasing overnight wealth.
After six years in this market, one thing has become very clear to me: one good trade won’t make you rich, but one reckless trade can destroy your capital.
Before trying to make money in crypto, learn how to survive the market.
Learn first. Earn later. That’s the real game.
And advice it's a good time to invest in $BTC
Please your own research then trade take care
$BTC
#Write2Earn!
Ten years ago today, Bitcoin was trading at $586. 😜$ESPORTS go Long don't miss this opportunity #Write2Earn
Today's that simple little question of mine, will you be able to buy Bitcoin again at 60,000? In my opinion no, you will never be able to see it. Because I had made a post one week ago, if you perhaps haven't seen that, okay I'll find their screenshot and put it up. So what I mean to say is, how did today's bounce feel? But again you won't get the price of 60. Yes, 62, 64, 65, 66 possible, but you will never get the chance to buy at 60. and this time to short for the seme time $BTC $ETH $SOL #Write2Earn
There’s one thing about DeFi that has always bothered me: you can make the right decision today and still get a completely different deal tomorrow.
You lend money because the rate looks good. A few days later, the rate changes. You borrow because the cost seems manageable. Then the market moves, and your numbers no longer look the same.
That’s the reason TermMax makes sense to me.
Its whole approach is built around knowing the deal before you enter it. The lending rate, borrowing cost and maturity are set from the start. That small change can make money feel less like a moving target and more like something you can actually plan around.
And TermMax isn’t stopping at basic lending. It has managed vaults, one-click leverage and structured products, while running across several networks.
What I like most is the simple idea behind it: don’t make users guess what happens next.
In DeFi, that kind of clarity can be more valuable than chasing the biggest number on the screen.
@TermMax $BOME $BTC $ETH #termmax
You lend money because the rate looks good. A few days later, the rate changes. You borrow because the cost seems manageable. Then the market moves, and your numbers no longer look the same.
That’s the reason TermMax makes sense to me.
Its whole approach is built around knowing the deal before you enter it. The lending rate, borrowing cost and maturity are set from the start. That small change can make money feel less like a moving target and more like something you can actually plan around.
And TermMax isn’t stopping at basic lending. It has managed vaults, one-click leverage and structured products, while running across several networks.
What I like most is the simple idea behind it: don’t make users guess what happens next.
In DeFi, that kind of clarity can be more valuable than chasing the biggest number on the screen.
@TermMax $BOME $BTC $ETH #termmax
DUSK and the privacy problem
I’ve looked at DUSK more than once, but the part that keeps pulling me back is its approach to privacy.
In most blockchains, privacy sounds like “hide everything.” Dusk takes a different route. It tries to let the network keep needed information private while still allowing authorized parties to prove what they need to prove. That feels much closer to how real finance works.
Take a simple example. Imagine a company tokenizing shares on Dusk. A buyer may not want everyone watching their wallet, holdings, or every move they make. At the same time, the company and regulators still need proof that the trade follows the rules. Dusk’s confidential security token design is built around this kind of use.
This is the point where I started looking at DUSK differently. I’m not only asking, “Can this token pump?” I’m asking, “Can this network solve a problem businesses actually have?”
There is still a lot to prove, especially real adoption. But that question alone makes Dusk worth watching for me.@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
I’ve looked at DUSK more than once, but the part that keeps pulling me back is its approach to privacy.
In most blockchains, privacy sounds like “hide everything.” Dusk takes a different route. It tries to let the network keep needed information private while still allowing authorized parties to prove what they need to prove. That feels much closer to how real finance works.
Take a simple example. Imagine a company tokenizing shares on Dusk. A buyer may not want everyone watching their wallet, holdings, or every move they make. At the same time, the company and regulators still need proof that the trade follows the rules. Dusk’s confidential security token design is built around this kind of use.
This is the point where I started looking at DUSK differently. I’m not only asking, “Can this token pump?” I’m asking, “Can this network solve a problem businesses actually have?”
There is still a lot to prove, especially real adoption. But that question alone makes Dusk worth watching for me.@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
Why I’m Looking at @TermMax Before the Token
I’m usually careful with new DeFi projects. I’ve seen many launches where the token gets all the attention, while the actual product is still waiting to prove itself.
TermMax made me look twice because the product is already there.
In simple words, TermMax lets people lend or borrow crypto for a fixed time with a fixed rate.
Here’s an easy example.
Suppose I borrow $1,000 on a platform where the rate can change. Today it might be 6%, but later it could become 9% or 10%. That makes planning harder.
On TermMax, imagine I agree to borrow $1,000 for six months at a 6% yearly rate. The rate stays fixed for that agreed period. The same idea works for lenders. If I lend $1,000 at a fixed rate, I know the rate and end date before I start.
That sounds simple, but for me, this is the interesting part. I don’t want to keep checking a loan every few hours and wondering what it will cost tomorrow.
TermMax is not risk-free, but I like the idea of building the product first and letting the token come later.
That’s what keeps me watching.$BTW $VELVET $TUT #termmax
I’m usually careful with new DeFi projects. I’ve seen many launches where the token gets all the attention, while the actual product is still waiting to prove itself.
TermMax made me look twice because the product is already there.
In simple words, TermMax lets people lend or borrow crypto for a fixed time with a fixed rate.
Here’s an easy example.
Suppose I borrow $1,000 on a platform where the rate can change. Today it might be 6%, but later it could become 9% or 10%. That makes planning harder.
On TermMax, imagine I agree to borrow $1,000 for six months at a 6% yearly rate. The rate stays fixed for that agreed period. The same idea works for lenders. If I lend $1,000 at a fixed rate, I know the rate and end date before I start.
That sounds simple, but for me, this is the interesting part. I don’t want to keep checking a loan every few hours and wondering what it will cost tomorrow.
TermMax is not risk-free, but I like the idea of building the product first and letting the token come later.
That’s what keeps me watching.$BTW $VELVET $TUT #termmax
සත්යායනය කළ
The Part of DeFi I Didn’t Understand Until I Tried TermMax
For a long time, I thought earning interest in DeFi was simple.
You deposit your USDT, see a nice rate, and wait.
Then the rate changes.
Maybe it was 4% yesterday. Today it is 2.8%. Tomorrow it could be something else. You still have your money, but you no longer know what the plan looks like.
That is the part TermMax is trying to change.
Look at this USDT/NVDAon market on BNB Chain. The screen shows a 2.50% lending rate and a 3.50% borrowing rate, with a fixed maturity date. The important part is not that 2.50% is a huge return. It isn’t.
The interesting part is knowing what the number means.
Think about a normal DeFi market like renting a room where the landlord can change the price every few days. You can stay there, but planning becomes annoying.
TermMax works more like agreeing on the rent before you move in.
A lender knows the rate for the fixed term. A borrower knows the cost for that same term. The market can create new rates later, but once your own deal is locked, that rate does not keep moving around during the term.
That sounds small until you actually use DeFi.
And now comes the real question.
Can TermMax keep this promise as the protocol grows?
The product is already live across multiple chains, and TMX is moving toward its token generation stage.
For me, that is what makes the next phase interesting.
The launch can create attention overnight. The harder test is what happens after the attention disappears.
A good DeFi idea is easy to explain.
A good DeFi product has to keep working when nobody is watching.@TermMax $ACE $HEMI $AKE #termmax
For a long time, I thought earning interest in DeFi was simple.
You deposit your USDT, see a nice rate, and wait.
Then the rate changes.
Maybe it was 4% yesterday. Today it is 2.8%. Tomorrow it could be something else. You still have your money, but you no longer know what the plan looks like.
That is the part TermMax is trying to change.
Look at this USDT/NVDAon market on BNB Chain. The screen shows a 2.50% lending rate and a 3.50% borrowing rate, with a fixed maturity date. The important part is not that 2.50% is a huge return. It isn’t.
The interesting part is knowing what the number means.
Think about a normal DeFi market like renting a room where the landlord can change the price every few days. You can stay there, but planning becomes annoying.
TermMax works more like agreeing on the rent before you move in.
A lender knows the rate for the fixed term. A borrower knows the cost for that same term. The market can create new rates later, but once your own deal is locked, that rate does not keep moving around during the term.
That sounds small until you actually use DeFi.
And now comes the real question.
Can TermMax keep this promise as the protocol grows?
The product is already live across multiple chains, and TMX is moving toward its token generation stage.
For me, that is what makes the next phase interesting.
The launch can create attention overnight. The harder test is what happens after the attention disappears.
A good DeFi idea is easy to explain.
A good DeFi product has to keep working when nobody is watching.@TermMax $ACE $HEMI $AKE #termmax
DUSK Made Me Rethink What Private” Means
At first, DUSK looked like another privacy-focused blockchain to me. Then I noticed the bigger idea.
The goal isn’t simply to hide transactions.
It’s to make financial information selectively visible.
That sounds like a small difference, but in regulated markets, it can be everything. A company may need to prove ownership, identity, or compliance without putting its entire financial history on a public ledger.
That’s where DUSK gets interesting.
Its network combines privacy technology with regulated asset infrastructure, giving institutions a way to use blockchain without treating transparency as an all-or-nothing decision.
Personally, that is the part I find worth watching.
Crypto spent years asking, “How open can finance become?”
DUSK seems to be asking a different question:
“How much should actually be visible in the first place?”
And honestly, that question may become more important than speed.@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
At first, DUSK looked like another privacy-focused blockchain to me. Then I noticed the bigger idea.
The goal isn’t simply to hide transactions.
It’s to make financial information selectively visible.
That sounds like a small difference, but in regulated markets, it can be everything. A company may need to prove ownership, identity, or compliance without putting its entire financial history on a public ledger.
That’s where DUSK gets interesting.
Its network combines privacy technology with regulated asset infrastructure, giving institutions a way to use blockchain without treating transparency as an all-or-nothing decision.
Personally, that is the part I find worth watching.
Crypto spent years asking, “How open can finance become?”
DUSK seems to be asking a different question:
“How much should actually be visible in the first place?”
And honestly, that question may become more important than speed.@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
I almost deleted the link without opening it.
Last month I put some USDT into a popular lending protocol. The rate looked decent when I deposited. Three days later it had already dropped. By the end of the week it was lower still. I kept refreshing the page, annoyed that I couldn’t plan anything.
That’s when someone sent me TermMax.
I didn’t expect much. Most “fixed-rate” claims still feel slippery. But I tried a small position anyway. The rate locked the moment I confirmed. No daily changes. No sudden drops. Just the same number sitting there until the term ends.
It felt strangely quiet after months of watching rates move against me.
I’m not saying every variable-rate protocol is bad. They have their place. But for the first time I could leave money and actually stop checking. That small difference changed how the whole thing felt.
I still don’t know what the token will do after launch. I only know that right now the product does one simple thing better than most: it keeps its word on the rate.
Sometimes that’s the only twist that matters.@TermMax $GPS $AKE $TUT #termmax
Last month I put some USDT into a popular lending protocol. The rate looked decent when I deposited. Three days later it had already dropped. By the end of the week it was lower still. I kept refreshing the page, annoyed that I couldn’t plan anything.
That’s when someone sent me TermMax.
I didn’t expect much. Most “fixed-rate” claims still feel slippery. But I tried a small position anyway. The rate locked the moment I confirmed. No daily changes. No sudden drops. Just the same number sitting there until the term ends.
It felt strangely quiet after months of watching rates move against me.
I’m not saying every variable-rate protocol is bad. They have their place. But for the first time I could leave money and actually stop checking. That small difference changed how the whole thing felt.
I still don’t know what the token will do after launch. I only know that right now the product does one simple thing better than most: it keeps its word on the rate.
Sometimes that’s the only twist that matters.@TermMax $GPS $AKE $TUT #termmax
Forget liquidity, buyers, geopolitics, and all the other noise. You may never get Bitcoin at $56,900 again. That price could be one of those levels people wish they had bought when they had the chance. And honestly, don’t be surprised if even $60,000 becomes a price you never see again.
Not this My last prediction
take the screen shot 🥃
$BTC #Write2Earn! 🤞
Not this My last prediction
take the screen shot 🥃
$BTC #Write2Earn! 🤞
DUSK: The Day I Realized Privacy Wasn’t the Real Story
I was looking at DUSK expecting to find another blockchain trying to sell the world a better version of crypto.
Then I noticed something I hadn’t expected.
$DUSK isn’t really fighting for the same battlefield.
Most blockchains seem to celebrate transparency. DUSK asks a more uncomfortable question: what if financial markets actually need less visibility, but not less accountability?
That distinction changes the whole picture.
Imagine owning a regulated asset where everyone can verify that you’re allowed to own it, while they still can’t see your entire financial life. That is the kind of problem DUSK is designed around, using shielded transactions, zero-knowledge proofs and selective disclosure.
And here comes the twist.
The interesting part may not be the privacy itself. It’s what privacy makes possible.
DUSK is building infrastructure where identity, compliance, asset transfers and settlement can live inside the same ecosystem, while developers can still use EVM tooling.
That makes me look at DUSK differently.
Maybe the real question isn’t, “Can DUSK
become another big crypto network?”
Maybe it is, “What happens when financial markets finally need a blockchain that knows when to speak, and when to stay silent?
@Dusk #dusk
I was looking at DUSK expecting to find another blockchain trying to sell the world a better version of crypto.
Then I noticed something I hadn’t expected.
$DUSK isn’t really fighting for the same battlefield.
Most blockchains seem to celebrate transparency. DUSK asks a more uncomfortable question: what if financial markets actually need less visibility, but not less accountability?
That distinction changes the whole picture.
Imagine owning a regulated asset where everyone can verify that you’re allowed to own it, while they still can’t see your entire financial life. That is the kind of problem DUSK is designed around, using shielded transactions, zero-knowledge proofs and selective disclosure.
And here comes the twist.
The interesting part may not be the privacy itself. It’s what privacy makes possible.
DUSK is building infrastructure where identity, compliance, asset transfers and settlement can live inside the same ecosystem, while developers can still use EVM tooling.
That makes me look at DUSK differently.
Maybe the real question isn’t, “Can DUSK
become another big crypto network?”
Maybe it is, “What happens when financial markets finally need a blockchain that knows when to speak, and when to stay silent?
@Dusk #dusk
Look, friends, the formula for success is different for everyone. Some people are happy with a hundred crores, some are unhappy with a thousand crores, and some are happy with ten thousand. And there are even people begging on the streets who still consider themselves the kings of the world.
So, we cannot define success by saying who is successful and who is not. But in my eyes, the person who is truly successful is the one who manages to stay happy in every situation, who knows how to remain happy no matter what.
That same idea makes me look at DUSK differently. In crypto, I don’t think every project needs to promise the biggest number. What matters is whether the technology solves a real problem.
One specific thing that stands out in DUSK is its focus on privacy with compliance. Its architecture supports confidential transactions and selective disclosure, meaning sensitive financial information can remain private while authorized parties can still verify what is necessary. DUSK also uses $DUSK as the native token for gas and staking.
For me, that practical balance is what makes DUSK interesting to watch.@Dusk $AKE #dusk
So, we cannot define success by saying who is successful and who is not. But in my eyes, the person who is truly successful is the one who manages to stay happy in every situation, who knows how to remain happy no matter what.
That same idea makes me look at DUSK differently. In crypto, I don’t think every project needs to promise the biggest number. What matters is whether the technology solves a real problem.
One specific thing that stands out in DUSK is its focus on privacy with compliance. Its architecture supports confidential transactions and selective disclosure, meaning sensitive financial information can remain private while authorized parties can still verify what is necessary. DUSK also uses $DUSK as the native token for gas and staking.
For me, that practical balance is what makes DUSK interesting to watch.@Dusk $AKE #dusk
AKEUSDT Trading Concerns
Shame on projects that turn trading into a joke like this. A massive price spike followed by such a sharp reversal raises serious questions about market integrity and investor protection.
I can only make one request to the broader crypto industry: projects that show clear signs of abusive or unhealthy market behavior should be investigated and, where appropriate, banned from trading platforms.
Crypto needs innovation, but it also needs trust, transparency, and accountability. Traders should not be treated like exit liquidity.
Protect the market. Protect the traders.
I love only $BTC $AKE #Write2Earn
Shame on projects that turn trading into a joke like this. A massive price spike followed by such a sharp reversal raises serious questions about market integrity and investor protection.
I can only make one request to the broader crypto industry: projects that show clear signs of abusive or unhealthy market behavior should be investigated and, where appropriate, banned from trading platforms.
Crypto needs innovation, but it also needs trust, transparency, and accountability. Traders should not be treated like exit liquidity.
Protect the market. Protect the traders.
I love only $BTC $AKE #Write2Earn
තවත් අන්තර්ගතයන් ගවේෂණය කිරීමට ඇතුල් වන්න