C Y R O N

බෙයාරිෂ්

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

🚨 BITCOIN JUST LOST $77,000.

Selling pressure is accelerating.

$75,000 is now the key level bulls need to defend.

Lose $75K, and the downside could open up fast.

This is a level I’m watching closely.

#SolanaTransactionV1GoesLiveOnMainnet
#FedHikeOddsRiseTo89%

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

Bitcoin is at a key level.

$79,500 has flipped from support into resistance after $BTC failed to hold above it.

If we reclaim $79.5K and hold, I’d be looking for a move back towards $81K+.

If we lose $78K, I’d expect the liquidity below to get taken first.

Simple levels to watch.

$79.5K reclaim = bullish.

$78K loss = bearish.

Until then, I’m waiting...

#SaudiHaltsSouthernEnergySitesAfterAttacks
#YenBreaks155NearingYearHigh
#USIranTradeTankerStrikesEscalate

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

BITCOIN WEEKLY ANALYSIS

Bitcoin closed the week right around the Weekly MA 50 near $80,349.

This is a major test for $BTC , not a confirmed breakout yet.

Here’s what I’m watching next 🧵

#USIranTradeTankerStrikesEscalate
#IMFSaysElSalvadorBTCNoPublicFunds
#IranSaysItHit3USShips3Tankers

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

$ETH weekly Supertrend has flipped green. 🟢

The last time this happened, ETH pumped over 100% in just 6 weeks.

If history repeats, a similar move could put ETH around $3,600 by October.

One signal doesn't guarantee the same outcome.

But this is definitely worth watching. 👀

#ZECHitsANewAllTimeHigh
#BitcoinETFsBiggestDailyInflowSinceJanuary
#USAugustJobGrowthNearlyTriplesForecast

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

BITCOIN JUST FLIPPED $79,500 INTO SUPPORT 🚨

Bitcoin broke through the $79,500 resistance I’ve been watching and pushed above $80K.

$BTC is now trading around $80.9K after briefly reaching above $82K.

The key level now is simple: $79.5K.

If Bitcoin holds above it, I’m watching $82K next.

Lose $79.5K, and this breakout starts looking a lot less convincing.

For now, the structure has improved significantly.

#USWeeklyInitialJoblessClaimsRiseTo206000
#HousePressesSenateOnCLARITYAct

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

ETH/BTC monthly chart is starting to look interesting.

Price has closed above the MA 20.

The last clean reclaim of this level came in July 2020.

What followed?

ETH/BTC: 0.0315 → 0.088
ETH: $225 → $4,372

In August 2025, price also touched this average but failed to hold it and eventually dumped back toward the lows.

That’s the key difference now.

ETH/BTC needs to stay above the MA 20.

MACD is also turning up from a similar area to the one that preceded the 2020 breakout.

If the hold works:

First target → 0.050
Stretch target → 0.088

Meanwhile, ISM came in at 54.6 vs 55.2 expected, showing growth is still holding up but slowing.

If macro conditions continue moving toward easier monetary policy, ETH could have more room to outperform.

This setup is definitely worth watching. 👀

#BitcoinETFBuyersReturn
#FedHikeOddsRiseTo68%
#G20StatementCitesDigitalAssets

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

Bitcoin just had its BEST August since 2017.

August 2026: +24.95%
August 2017: +65.32%

But here's what happened after August 2017:

October: +47.81%
November: +53.48%
December: +38.89%

History doesn't have to repeat.

But when you see a setup like this, it's hard not to pay attention. 👀

#ARBRises30%OnRobinhoodChainRevenue
#Japan10YYieldHits3%FirstSince1996
#WTIOilRisesAsOpenInterestShrinks

බෙයාරිෂ්

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

$ETH tried to break above the $2,550 level but failed again.

For now, I think most of Ethereum's short-term upside may already be priced in.

Expecting more chop around these levels, with the possibility of one more small capitulation before a proper reversal.

Patience here.
#SKHynixStudiesJapanMemoryChipVenture
#KospiDrops3.6%AsSamsungSKHynixWeaken
#UKReleasesFirstCryptoGainsTaxStats

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

BITCOIN GOLDEN CROSS INCOMING.

If $BTC can hold here or continue higher into September, the daily Golden Cross will officially confirm.

It has flashed 4 times near the end of bear markets.

3 times, it got the direction right.

Could Bitcoin be setting up for another major trend reversal? 🚀

#KoreaSingleStockLeveragedETFTradingFalls
#VietnamPilotsCryptoAssetMarket
#GoldFalls3.24%ThisWeek

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

Here's the trend over the past few years.

Non-farm payroll data is always subject to revision because the initial number is only an early estimate.

The revised numbers can show a very different picture.

Since 2022, we've seen a clear pattern of mostly downward revisions.

For example, a report showing +50K jobs could later be revised down to +25K.

That would mean the labor market was weaker than initially reported.

Now, the 2025 annual NFP revision stands at -911K jobs, highlighting just how large these adjustments can be.

So if today's NFP data comes in strong, the market may see less reason for the Fed to cut rates.

That could put pressure on risk assets like $BTC
#SOLJumps20%OnTheWeek
#CaliforniaBillWouldBarOfficialMemeCoins
#TRONMainnetActivatesTVMPragueOsaka

SOL-1.94%

උසබ තත්ත්වය

ETH/BTC තවමත් මීළඟ පියවර සඳහා වැදගත් විය හැකි මට්ටමක් රඳවාගෙන සිටියි.

0.03100 සහායය කිහිප වරක්ම පරීක්‍ෂා කර ඇත, මේ වන තෙක් මිලදී ගන්නන් එය ආරක්ෂා කරමින් සිටියි.

මෙතැනට ඉහළින් රඳා ගන්න → ඊළඟට 0.03250.

0.03250 නිරවුල්ව බිඳ දැමුවොත් → BTCට එරෙහිව ETHට වඩා ශක්තිමත් සාපේක්ෂ කාර්යසාධනයක් පෙන්වීමට පටන්ගත හැක.

0.03100 අහිමි වුණොත් → සකස්වීම වෙනස් වේ.

දැනට නම්, ETH/BTC තවමත් එහි breakout එක රඳවාගෙන සිටියි.

පැතිර යාමට පෙර ඉවසිල්ලෙන් සිටින්න.

#GoldRisesAbout14%InAugust
#KospiFallsAsAITradingEuphoriaCools
#TaiwanTAIEXRetakes46500OnChipRally

බෙයාරිෂ්

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

$BTC has dropped below $80,000.

Meanwhile, U.S. stock futures are trading higher, with Oil and the DXY also moving up.

Pre-market update:

▫️ Nasdaq futures: +0.98% 🟠
▫️ S&P 500 futures: +0.46% 🟠

Bitcoin is showing some weakness despite a positive start for broader markets.
#KospiClosesAtRecordHigh
#ChinaOpposesUSProposed7.5%Tariff
#BankOfKoreaHikesRatesTo3%

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

Went through the CreatorPad task on @Dusk this week and the thing that stuck with me wasn't in the task brief at all, it was that the $DUSK bridge has now been paused for over ten days and nobody at Dusk seems in a rush to reopen it. #dusk

Quick context for anyone who missed it: on August 16 the team flagged unusual activity on a wallet used for bridge operations, recycled the affected addresses, and pushed a recipient blocklist through the Web Wallet after part of the flow touched Binance. DuskDS mainnet itself never stopped producing blocks. That's the part I kept coming back to.

I'd assumed a privacy-focused L1 concentrated its risk in one place, the base layer. Watching the chain run clean while the bridge sat frozen made it obvious that's not how the trust boundaries actually split here. The bridge is its own liability, held to its own timeline, independent of consensus health.

Binance users were arguably protected first, just by the blocklist existing before withdrawals could route through. Everyone else is still waiting on "temporarily."

Not sure what the actual threshold is before "temporary" starts meaning something else.

Which matters more here?

🟢 Mainnet's clean uptime

100%

🔴 Bridge still closed

⚖️ Both equally

🤷 Too early to say

1 ඡන්ද • ඡන්දය අවසන්

මේ සතියේ මුල්වරනේ Dusk හි Web Wallet එක හරහා කුඩා ට්‍රාන්ස්ෆර් එකක් ටිකක් කරද්දී, CreatorPad task එකක් අවසන් කරමින් සිටියදී, මට හිතපු නැති blocklist warning එකකින් අතරමග නවත්තලා දුන්නා. කිසිවක් භයානක දෙයක් නෙවෙයි—ට්‍රාන්ස්ෆර් එක submit වෙන්න කලින්ම “රතු ධජයක්” වගේ. $DUSK ගේ selective-disclosure privacy model එකක් මත ගොඩනැගුණු, #dusk , @Dusk_Foundation වගේ chain එකක ඒ වගේ දෙයක් හමුවෙයි කියලා මට නම් අමුතුයි. පෙනී ගියේ ඒ warning එක mid-August කාලයේදී compromised bridge operations wallet එකක් සම්බන්ධ සිද්ධියෙන් පස්සේ Web Wallet එකට team එක දාපු recipient blocklist එකටම trace වෙන බව. ඔබට යවන්නට පෙර දන්නා ලෙස flag කරපු addresses වලට එරෙහිව පිටතට යන transfer scan කරනවා. මම හිතාගෙන හිටියේ privacy-first කියන්නේ checkpoints අඩුවෙයි කියලා, වැඩි වෙනවා නොවෙයි කියලා. ඇත්තටම ඒක ක්‍රියාත්මක වුණ හැටි බලාගත්තම ඒ අදහස ටිකක් වෙනස් වුණා. ඒ mechanism එක වැඩ කරන්නේ, ඒ ලැයිස්තුව near real time එකට සමහරෙකු යාවත්කාලීන කරමින් maintain කරනවා නම් පමණයි; එයින් අදහස් වන්නේ “confidential by default” කියන pitch එක යටින් නිහඬව ඉඳලා තියෙන curatorial layer එකක් දක්වා තිබෙන බව. මම කියන්නේ ඒක වැරදියි කියලා නෙවෙයි—පිළිගැනීමයි. selective disclosure සහ address screening එකම දේ නොවෙයි, නමුත් දැන් ඒ දෙකම එකම wallet එක තුළ එකට ජීවත් වෙනවා. ඒ ගැන මට කොච්චර සුවපහසුවක් තියේද කියලා තවමත් හොයාගන්නවා, ඉදිරියට මේ ලැයිස්තුවට මොනවා එකතු කරන්නේ හරියටම කවුද කියලත්. {spot}(DUSKUSDT) {spot}(ONGUSDT) {spot}(JASMYUSDT) මේකෙන් ඔබට වඩාත් කැපී පෙනුණේ කොයි කොටසද? 👀

උසබ තත්ත්වය

මේ සතියේ මුල්වරනේ Dusk හි Web Wallet එක හරහා කුඩා ට්‍රාන්ස්ෆර් එකක් ටිකක් කරද්දී, CreatorPad task එකක් අවසන් කරමින් සිටියදී, මට හිතපු නැති blocklist warning එකකින් අතරමග නවත්තලා දුන්නා. කිසිවක් භයානක දෙයක් නෙවෙයි—ට්‍රාන්ස්ෆර් එක submit වෙන්න කලින්ම “රතු ධජයක්” වගේ. $DUSK ගේ selective-disclosure privacy model එකක් මත ගොඩනැගුණු, #dusk , @Dusk වගේ chain එකක ඒ වගේ දෙයක් හමුවෙයි කියලා මට නම් අමුතුයි.

පෙනී ගියේ ඒ warning එක mid-August කාලයේදී compromised bridge operations wallet එකක් සම්බන්ධ සිද්ධියෙන් පස්සේ Web Wallet එකට team එක දාපු recipient blocklist එකටම trace වෙන බව. ඔබට යවන්නට පෙර දන්නා ලෙස flag කරපු addresses වලට එරෙහිව පිටතට යන transfer scan කරනවා.

මම හිතාගෙන හිටියේ privacy-first කියන්නේ checkpoints අඩුවෙයි කියලා, වැඩි වෙනවා නොවෙයි කියලා. ඇත්තටම ඒක ක්‍රියාත්මක වුණ හැටි බලාගත්තම ඒ අදහස ටිකක් වෙනස් වුණා. ඒ mechanism එක වැඩ කරන්නේ, ඒ ලැයිස්තුව near real time එකට සමහරෙකු යාවත්කාලීන කරමින් maintain කරනවා නම් පමණයි; එයින් අදහස් වන්නේ “confidential by default” කියන pitch එක යටින් නිහඬව ඉඳලා තියෙන curatorial layer එකක් දක්වා තිබෙන බව.

මම කියන්නේ ඒක වැරදියි කියලා නෙවෙයි—පිළිගැනීමයි. selective disclosure සහ address screening එකම දේ නොවෙයි, නමුත් දැන් ඒ දෙකම එකම wallet එක තුළ එකට ජීවත් වෙනවා. ඒ ගැන මට කොච්චර සුවපහසුවක් තියේද කියලා තවමත් හොයාගන්නවා, ඉදිරියට මේ ලැයිස්තුවට මොනවා එකතු කරන්නේ හරියටම කවුද කියලත්.

මේකෙන් ඔබට වඩාත් කැපී පෙනුණේ කොයි කොටසද? 👀

🚫 The blocklist itself

50%

🔑 Who maintains the list

50%

⚖️ Privacy vs. gatekeeping

💭 Something else

2 ඡන්ද • ඡන්දය අවසන්

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

Checked the Dusk bridge status page again this week and it's still showing paused, same as it's been since the August 16th incident where the team flagged suspicious activity on a wallet used for bridge operations. That's the detail that stuck with me while wrapping up this CreatorPad task on @Dusk , $DUSK , #dusk : nine-plus days on, the addresses are recycled, the blocklist is live, but the bridge itself hasn't come back online.

The official line was clean, not a protocol-level issue, DuskDS kept producing blocks normally, no user funds affected. And technically that's true. But I went in assuming "not a protocol bug" meant "quick fix." It didn't. Operational infrastructure managed by a team, even on a chain built around deterministic settlement and audit-grade privacy, still moves on human timelines once something touches a centralized flow.

What struck me more than the incident itself was the gap between how confidently reassuring the messaging is and how long the actual remediation is taking. Those two things aren't necessarily in tension, but they read differently side by side.

Not sure yet whether this is just careful process or something more structural about how bridges get treated post-incident. Watching to see when it actually reopens.

Which part stands out to you? 🤔

🛠️ The framing

50%

⏳ The timeline

🔐 Wallet risk

🤷 Just normal caution

50%

2 ඡන්ද • ඡන්දය අවසන්

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

🚨 BREAKING:

Bitcoin just printed its largest weekly candle since March 2023.

$BTC gained 23.56%, adding roughly $14,800 in just one week.

That's a massive move for Bitcoin in such a short period.

The momentum is back. 🚀
#BitcoinStrongestWeekSinceMarch2023
#CanadaUSTradeTalksCollapse

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

Reading through the CreatorPad brief on $DUSK , I got stuck on one line in Dusk's own bridge incident notice: the team disabled and recycled a set of addresses after flagging unusual activity on a team-managed wallet used for bridge operations, then paused bridge services entirely while they sorted it out. #dusk

That's the part that got me. Not the incident itself, but the response shape. @Dusk spends most of its messaging on user-side privacy, selective disclosure, compliance rails, all the stuff built for the person holding the wallet. This wasn't that. It was an internal operational key that got compromised behavior flagged around it, and the fix was blunt: pause everything, rebuild the address set, ship a recipient blocklist to catch anything trying to move through the web wallet.

I'd assumed the "regulated infra" framing meant the operational side was hardened too, maybe more than most L1s given the institutional pitch. Turns out the failure mode wasn't a smart contract exploit or a governance vote gone sideways, it was a managed wallet, which is a much more boring and much more universal problem.

Still not sure if that's reassuring or the opposite.

What stood out most from Dusk's bridge response?

🛑 Full pause

60%

🔑 Team wallet risk

40%

🧊 "No impact" claim

🤷 Not surprised

5 ඡන්ද • ඡන්දය අවසන්

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

Spent the week digging into Dusk's bridge infrastructure for this CreatorPad round, and the thing that stopped me wasn't a feature, it was the August 16 incident notice. The team caught suspicious activity on a wallet they controlled for bridge operations, and had to disable and recycle a batch of addresses on the spot. $DUSK , #dusk , @Dusk , I went in expecting to write about DuskEVM's testnet momentum. I left thinking about something else entirely.

Here's what got me: the bridge itself didn't break. The zk layer, the consensus, none of that was touched. What gave way was a team-managed wallet, the kind of operational component every bridge quietly depends on and nobody really audits in public. Dusk moved fast, paused services, coordinated with Binance once part of the flow surfaced there. Reasonable response. But it exposed the gap between "protocol-level security" and "the humans running the infra layer", two things I'd been treating as one.

I'd assumed bridge risk mostly lived in the contract code. Turns out the softer surface, the operational one, is just as load-bearing. Still not sure how you audit for that.

What's the real bridge risk?

🔐 Contract code

👤 Team wallets

50%

🌉 Message relay

🧩 Upgrade keys

50%

2 ඡන්ද • ඡන්දය අවසන්

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

Ran a quick RPC check against the DuskEVM testnet before deploying anything, just to confirm I was actually on the right network. Small step, but it grounded the CreatorPad task in something real instead of docs screenshots. Bridged a batch of $DUSK from DuskDS to fund the deployment wallet, then pushed a basic Solidity contract through Hardhat. #dusk @Dusk

What actually stopped me wasn't the deployment succeeding, it was the fee breakdown afterward. I'd assumed "privacy-preserving EVM" meant privacy was baked into every transaction by default. It isn't. The execution fee and the data-availability fee for posting the batch back to DuskDS were both fully visible, standard OP-Stack style. Nothing shielded unless you deliberately route through Hedger.

That's a fair assumption to have gotten wrong. Dusk's messaging leans hard on confidentiality, so it's easy to expect the EVM layer inherits that by default rather than as something you opt into separately.

Makes sense architecturally, settlement and privacy tooling staying decoupled from general-purpose execution. Still curious how many devs building here right now are actually reaching for Hedger, versus just shipping standard EVM contracts and moving on. This is my own observation from testing, not financial advice worth digging into further if you're evaluating the ecosystem.

Which part of building on DuskEVM would you try first? 👇

🔧 Standard Solidity contract

🕶️ Hedger private execution

🌉 Just the bridge

🤔 Still deciding

0 ඡන්ද • ඡන්දය අවසන්

උසබ තත්ත්වය

පරිවර්තනය බලන්න

Absolutely HISTORIC.

Bitcoin is moving 140x faster than the stock market right now.

$BTC has surged more than 20% in less than five days, climbing from roughly $63K to above $77K.

For comparison, the S&P 500 has historically returned around 10% per year.

Bitcoin just delivered that kind of return in under five days.

Nearly 3 months of losses erased in just 5 days.

And this is now Bitcoin's strongest weekly rally since February 2024.

This is unbelievable. 🚀
#USJoblessClaimsFallTo206000
#TrumpPressesCongressToPassClarityAct