CoinoMedia

Bitcoin wallets holding between 10 and 10,000 BTC have reached an all-time high of 20,338.
Santiment reports that the number of these wallets has climbed sharply since mid-July.
The growth suggests expanding large-holder participation despite Bitcoin’s price volatility.
The number of Bitcoin wallets holding between 10 and 10,000 BTC has reached a record 20,338, according to blockchain analytics platform Santiment.
The milestone highlights growing activity among larger Bitcoin holders, even as the cryptocurrency continues to experience price fluctuations.
Santiment reports that the number of addresses in this balance range has increased sharply since mid-July.
These addresses are often associated with substantial investors, although the category includes a wide range of holders, from individuals with relatively large positions to institutions and custodial entities.
The latest Bitcoin whale wallets data suggests that more blockchain addresses now hold significant amounts of BTC than at any previous point in the reported dataset.
However, the rising address count does not necessarily mean that 20,338 separate investors own these holdings.
A single investor or institution can control multiple Bitcoin addresses.
Why Large Bitcoin Wallets Are Increasing
The steady rise in Bitcoin whale wallets has attracted attention because it has continued despite market volatility.
When the number of addresses holding substantial Bitcoin balances increases, it can indicate growing participation among larger market holders.
Some investors may be building positions, while others could be reorganizing existing holdings across multiple addresses.
The distinction matters because wallet counts measure blockchain addresses rather than verified individual owners.
For example, an exchange or institutional custodian may distribute Bitcoin across several wallets for operational or security reasons.
Similarly, transfers between addresses can change the number of wallets within a particular balance category without representing new investment.
Nevertheless, the sharp increase since mid-July shows that Bitcoin’s onchain ownership structure is changing.
Santiment’s reported milestone provides another data point for analysts monitoring large-holder behavior.
NEW: Bitcoin wallets holding 10–10,000 $BTC hit an all-time high of 20,338, climbing sharply since mid-July despite price volatility, per Santiment. pic.twitter.com/RcVbWBQp8L
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) October 16, 2026
What Record Bitcoin Whale Wallets Mean for BTC
The record number of Bitcoin whale wallets could be viewed as a constructive signal for Bitcoin’s longer-term market participation.
Large holders often attract attention because their trading decisions can influence liquidity and the amount of BTC available for sale.
If the increase in wallet numbers is accompanied by rising aggregate balances, it may suggest that substantial holders are absorbing more Bitcoin supply.
However, the reported address count alone does not establish how much additional BTC has been accumulated.
It also cannot confirm whether the new addresses belong to existing holders or entirely new investors.
For a clearer picture, analysts may examine total balances held by the group, exchange inflows and outflows, and changes in Bitcoin’s price structure.
These indicators can help distinguish genuine accumulation from wallet redistribution.
Importantly, a record number of large Bitcoin addresses does not guarantee that BTC prices will rise.
Broader market demand, investor sentiment and economic conditions remain important influences.
For now, Santiment’s findings show that 20,338 Bitcoin addresses hold between 10 and 10,000 BTC, marking a new record despite recent market uncertainty.
The trend highlights sustained activity among larger holders as Bitcoin continues navigating a volatile market.

Bitcoin traders are watching a support trendline near $80,400.
October’s price performance has been weaker than the month’s historically bullish reputation.
Holding support could help stabilize BTC, while a breakdown may increase downside pressure.
Bitcoin is approaching an important technical area as traders assess whether the cryptocurrency can maintain its current price structure.
According to a recent market observation, a support trendline near $80,400 has become a critical level to watch.
“The line in the sand is the support trendline currently near $80.4K,” the analyst stated.
The comment highlights the importance of this price region as Bitcoin navigates a challenging October.
A support trendline connects price areas where buyers have previously shown interest. Traders use these levels to identify potential points where selling pressure could ease.
The Bitcoin $80.4K support level is therefore being watched as a possible indicator of the market’s next direction.
However, technical levels can shift over time, and a trendline does not guarantee that buyers will defend a particular price.
Why October Is Disappointing Bitcoin Traders
October has historically attracted attention among cryptocurrency investors because Bitcoin has often delivered positive returns during the month.
This seasonal reputation has earned October the nickname “Uptober” within the crypto community.
However, historical patterns do not always repeat.
The latest market commentary suggests that Bitcoin’s October performance has fallen short of the bullish expectations associated with the month.
Instead of relying on seasonal trends, traders are increasingly focused on technical support and the strength of underlying demand.
A weaker October does not automatically mean Bitcoin has entered a prolonged bearish market.
Short-term price movements can be influenced by macroeconomic developments, investor positioning and changes in liquidity.
The available commentary does not provide a specific month-to-date return, so the extent of October’s underperformance cannot be quantified from this observation alone.
Bitcoin Tests $80.4K Support as October Lags History
“The line in the sand is the support trendline currently near $80.4K.” – By @coinjuicehq pic.twitter.com/GhcIvSTsdr
— CryptoQuant.com (@cryptoquant_com) October 16, 2026
What Happens if Bitcoin $80.4K Support Breaks?
The Bitcoin $80.4K support area could play an important role in shaping near-term market sentiment.
If Bitcoin holds above the trendline and attracts renewed buying interest, traders may interpret the move as evidence that support remains intact.
A sustained rebound could help restore confidence after the recent period of uncertainty.
However, a decisive breakdown below the trendline could suggest weakening demand and increase the possibility of further price declines.
Traders may look for confirmation through daily closing prices, trading volume and subsequent attempts to reclaim the level.
A brief move below support is not always enough to establish a lasting bearish trend.
Broader factors, including institutional demand and spot Bitcoin ETF flows, may also influence the outcome.
For now, the analyst’s message is straightforward: the trendline near $80,400 is an important technical boundary for Bitcoin.
Whether BTC holds or loses that level could help determine the direction of its next significant price move.

CoreWeave and Broadcom are reportedly pushing back against plans to list tokenized versions of their shares.
The dispute involves OKXICE, a joint venture between OKX and ICE, according to The Information.
The disagreement raises questions about issuer consent and oversight in the growing tokenized stock market.
CoreWeave and Broadcom are reportedly opposing plans to list tokenized versions of their shares through OKXICE, a joint venture involving cryptocurrency exchange OKX and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE).
According to The Information, both companies are pushing back against the proposed listings.
The development highlights growing tensions between traditional publicly traded companies and platforms seeking to bring stock exposure onto blockchain networks.
Tokenized stocks are digital instruments designed to represent or track the value of traditional company shares.
They can offer investors a way to access stock-linked products through blockchain-based financial infrastructure.
However, not all tokenized stock products provide direct ownership of the underlying shares.
Their legal structure, shareholder rights and redemption arrangements can vary significantly.
The reported opposition from CoreWeave and Broadcom suggests that some public companies want greater clarity about how their shares are represented in these products.
Why CoreWeave and Broadcom Are Pushing Back
The dispute over OKXICE tokenized stocks raises important questions about the relationship between token issuers, trading platforms and the companies whose shares are being represented.
Traditional stock markets operate within established systems involving exchanges, brokers, custodians and securities regulators.
Tokenized equity products introduce additional technology and potentially different arrangements for trading and settlement.
Companies may have concerns about how their names, shares and investor rights are presented to customers.
However, The Information report, as summarized, does not establish the specific objections raised by CoreWeave or Broadcom.
It also does not confirm whether either company has taken legal action or whether the proposed listings have been canceled.
As a result, the reported pushback should not be interpreted as a final regulatory or legal decision.
The situation illustrates the challenges that can emerge when blockchain-based financial products involve assets issued by companies outside the crypto industry.
NEW: CoreWeave and Broadcom are pushing back on OKX and ICE’s joint venture OKXICE listing tokenized versions of their shares, per The Information. pic.twitter.com/PoWYQLdVlT
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) October 16, 2026
What the OKXICE Tokenized Stocks Dispute Means
The disagreement comes as interest in tokenized real-world assets continues to grow.
Supporters of stock tokenization argue that blockchain infrastructure could improve settlement efficiency and expand access to financial markets.
However, introducing tokenized versions of publicly traded shares also creates questions about compliance, investor protection and the rights attached to each product.
The OKXICE tokenized stocks dispute could draw attention to whether platforms need cooperation from the underlying companies and how securities rules apply to different token structures.
The answer may depend on the specific product design and the jurisdictions involved.
For investors, understanding whether a token represents actual share ownership or merely provides price exposure is particularly important.
The reported opposition does not establish that all tokenized equity products require direct issuer approval.
For now, CoreWeave and Broadcom’s pushback highlights the friction between traditional corporate interests and the expanding market for blockchain-based stock products.
Further details about the companies’ objections and OKXICE’s response will help clarify what happens next.

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $5.06 million in net inflows on October 15.
BlackRock’s IBIT led Bitcoin funds with $16.79 million in net inflows.
Spot Ethereum ETFs saw $60.22 million in net outflows, including $44.39 million from BlackRock’s ETHA.
U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds returned to positive territory on October 15, 2026, recording modest net inflows after the previous session’s withdrawals.
According to the reported ETF flow data, spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted $5.06 million in net inflows during the trading day.
BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust, IBIT, led individual Bitcoin funds with $16.79 million in net inflows.
Although IBIT attracted more capital than the overall category’s net total, withdrawals from other Bitcoin ETFs offset part of those gains.
The positive result marks a shift from October 14, when Bitcoin ETFs recorded $261 million in net outflows.
However, the relatively small daily inflow suggests that investor demand remained mixed rather than showing a broad recovery across all funds.
The latest Bitcoin ETF inflows indicate that some investors continued adding Bitcoin exposure despite recent market uncertainty.
Ethereum ETFs Record $60.22 Million in Outflows
While Bitcoin ETFs returned to positive territory, Ethereum investment products continued experiencing withdrawals.
On October 15, U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded $60.22 million in net outflows.
BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust ETF, ETHA, accounted for $44.39 million in net withdrawals.
That represented approximately 74% of the category’s total net outflow for the day.
The figures highlight a clear difference between investor activity in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs.
<text weight=”medium”>Spot ETF flows — October 15, 2026 (ET)</text>
ETF category or fundNet flowBitcoin spot ETFs+$5.06MBlackRock IBIT+$16.79MEthereum spot ETFs-$60.22MBlackRock ETHA-$44.39MCombined BTC and ETH ETFs-$55.16M
Individual fund figures are included within their respective category totals.
Despite Bitcoin’s positive result, the two ETF categories experienced approximately $55.16 million in combined net outflows.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs Recorded $5.06 Million in Net Inflows, While Spot Ethereum ETFs Saw $60.22 Million in Net Outflows Yesterday
On October 15 (ET), spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded total net inflows of $5.06 million, led by BlackRock’s IBIT with $16.79 million in net inflows. Spot… pic.twitter.com/5KdZ4MnY4h
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) October 16, 2026
What Bitcoin ETF Inflows Mean for Crypto Markets
The latest Bitcoin ETF inflows offer a mixed picture of institutional and traditional market demand for cryptocurrency exposure.
Bitcoin funds managed to attract a small amount of net capital, while Ethereum ETFs continued to lose assets through net redemptions.
This divergence may reflect different investor preferences, portfolio adjustments or short-term market conditions.
However, one trading session is not enough to establish a lasting shift in demand.
ETF flows measure net fund creations and redemptions, not the total amount of cryptocurrency bought or sold across the entire market.
They also do not directly determine Bitcoin or Ethereum prices.
Investors will likely monitor whether Bitcoin ETFs can maintain positive flows over several sessions and whether Ethereum withdrawals begin to slow.
For now, Bitcoin’s $5.06 million inflow offers a modest positive signal, but Ethereum’s $60.22 million outflow keeps the overall ETF picture negative.

Web3 becomes easier to understand when each token has a clear job. Some tokens represent rights connected to real-world assets. Others provide access to digital services, participation opportunities or ecosystem benefits. The nGRND Gold Protocol brings these ideas into one broader model while keeping their purposes distinct. Its Staking & Rewards Ecosystem is built around NGRND, a utility token, while a separate future nGRND Gold Token is intended to represent Preserved Gold.
An RWA, or real-world asset, token connects a digital token with an asset or associated rights outside the blockchain. The details of that connection matter. A token needs a legal and operational structure explaining what it represents, who controls the underlying rights and what the holder can actually do. Putting a token on a blockchain does not, by itself, establish ownership, redemption rights or a reliable value for the asset it references. That theme runs through recent coverage of the sector. In his August piece on the push to tokenize everything, Forbes contributor Boaz Sobrado put tokenized real-world assets on public blockchains at roughly $31 billion, citing RWA.xyz, and noted that legal and regulatory complexity slows adoption, with nGRND’s in-ground gold among the examples discussed.
The proposed nGRND Gold Token addresses the asset side of the model. It is intended to directly represent Preserved Gold: verified gold remaining in its natural location. The amount represented, valuation methodology and token-holder rights are to be defined within the legal and regulatory structure of the offering. This differs from treating every gold-related digital token as an interchangeable claim on refined bullion. The resource and preservation arrangements need to be understood on their own terms. Speaking to CCN in July, nGRND Chair David Lucatch said the company intends to issue tokens against only a small proportion of each verified resource, with qualified persons signing off on the amount and classification of the gold, as a way to manage risk.
NGRND has a different purpose. It powers participation in the nGRND Gold Protocol Staking & Rewards Ecosystem. Participants can own and stake NGRND, engage in activities and build their position within the rewards framework. Generally, more staking can increase a participant’s Reward Level, while participation can influence weighting and potential access to available Rewards. This is a utility proposition linked to ecosystem use, rather than a direct claim to an allocated quantity of gold.
The intersection becomes useful when the asset story and the participation experience support a shared purpose. Preserved Gold gives the Protocol a foundation connected to natural resources and measured impact. The utility ecosystem gives people activities they can understand and use. Someone may first arrive through a game, a learning activity or a partner community, then discover the wider preservation model. Others may arrive because of an interest in gold and become active participants.
Eight Participation Streams provide different entry points: Governance, Impact, Play, Learn, Advocate, Refer, Wellbeing and Agent. This range matters because people have different interests and abilities. A person who enjoys games may participate differently from someone interested in education or community advocacy. Bringing those activities into a common ecosystem creates more potential uses for the utility token and gives partners ways to connect with an existing participant community.
The DSBT, or Dynamic Soulbound Token, connects the participant with that ecosystem. It is designed as a permanent, non-transferable credential attached to a Base wallet, with a record that can evolve through participation. Its role is different again: it provides a participation identity and access framework. Keeping the utility token, the DSBT and the future RWA token separate helps people understand what they hold and why each component exists.
The growth figures show that the utility experience already has meaningful reach. Following the August 6, 2026 launch, the dashboard reports 283,024 total accounts and 254,870 DSBT holders. It records 273,313 email-verified accounts, providing a concrete verification measure, and 3,551,789 task completions. These figures support a claim of early ecosystem adoption. They do not establish the issuance, valuation or market success of the separate future RWA token.
The activity measures make the story more substantial. There are 48,982 daily active accounts, 125,737 weekly active accounts and 236,063 monthly active accounts in the snapshot. People are engaging with the participation layer, which is an important achievement for a Web3 project. Continued engagement can make the ecosystem more useful to partners and create further opportunities for NGRND utility. It does not guarantee token appreciation or future Rewards.
Eligible Rewards from the nGRND Group activities in the gold arena are intended to be distributed for Ecosystem participation in stablecoins such as USDC or USDT, subject to applicable laws, eligibility, treasury performance and program terms. That gives each component a clear role: NGRND supports participation, stablecoins provide the intended Rewards, and the future nGRND Gold Token addresses Preserved Gold representation. The opportunity at nGRND.io is to connect these roles in a practical ecosystem where people understand the assets, use the services and have reasons to keep participating.
Get grounded
www.ngrnd.io
@nGRND_io @nGRNDesg @DigItGoldGame @GAMEEToken @predictfully_ @Astra__Nova @FirstClassMetal

Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan says US regulators should oversee market operators rather than the underlying blockchain.
Yan argues that Hyperliquid’s Layer 1 network should be treated as shared financial infrastructure.
Kraken parent Payward reportedly plans to use Hyperliquid technology for regulated US derivatives trading.
Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan has called for a different approach to cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, arguing that regulators should focus on companies operating financial markets rather than the blockchain infrastructure supporting them.
Speaking on Bloomberg’s Odd Lots podcast, Yan said Hyperliquid’s Layer 1 blockchain should be viewed as financial infrastructure instead of a traditional cryptocurrency exchange.
Under his proposed approach, regulatory obligations would apply to businesses that create, deploy and control markets operating on the network.
The distinction is important because a blockchain can provide technology used by multiple independent financial services.
Yan’s position suggests that the same underlying infrastructure could support different market operators, each responsible for meeting applicable regulatory requirements.
However, this represents his preferred regulatory framework, not an established US regulatory classification for Hyperliquid.
Hyperliquid Wants to Support Wall Street Institutions
Yan also explained that Hyperliquid aims to provide infrastructure for traditional financial institutions rather than replace them.
The network is designed to support trading activity through a shared blockchain-based system.
In this model, financial firms could potentially build services using Hyperliquid’s technology while retaining responsibility for their own market operations.
Bloomberg reported that Payward, the parent company of Kraken, plans to offer derivatives to US investors using Hyperliquid technology through a regulated exchange.
The reported plan illustrates how blockchain infrastructure could be integrated into traditional financial markets.
However, the arrangement does not mean Hyperliquid itself has received authorization to serve US customers.
Hyperliquid remains unavailable to US users, and Payward’s reported plans should not be interpreted as a change to that restriction.
Details about the timing and structure of the planned derivatives offering remain important for understanding how it would operate.
Hyperliquid Founder Jeff Yan Says US Regulation Should Target Market Operators, Not the Underlying Blockchain
Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan told Bloomberg's Odd Lots podcast that US regulators should treat Hyperliquid's Layer 1 blockchain as financial infrastructure rather than a… pic.twitter.com/APajp44kY6
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) October 15, 2026
What Hyperliquid US Regulation Could Mean for DeFi
The debate surrounding Hyperliquid US regulation reflects a broader question facing decentralized finance: who should be responsible when financial services operate on blockchain networks?
Traditional exchanges generally operate under rules governing trading venues and market intermediaries.
Blockchain networks can be structured differently, with infrastructure and market operations potentially handled by separate participants.
Yan argues that oversight should follow the entities exercising actual control over financial markets.
Such an approach could allow institutions to use shared blockchain infrastructure while complying with rules relevant to their activities.
Nevertheless, determining regulatory responsibility can be complicated when developers, operators and users have overlapping roles.
US regulators would ultimately need to assess the specific activities and legal responsibilities involved.
For now, Yan’s message is that Hyperliquid wants to become infrastructure for established financial institutions, not a replacement for Wall Street.
His comments highlight an ongoing discussion about how existing financial regulations should apply to blockchain-based trading systems.

The White House’s new AI task force is scheduled to hold its first meeting on Thursday.
The meeting comes amid growing pressure on the Trump administration to address AI safety concerns.
The task force’s priorities and potential policy recommendations have not yet been detailed.
White House AI Task Force Prepares for First Meeting
The White House AI task force is set to hold its first meeting on Thursday, October 15, as the Trump administration faces increasing calls to strengthen its approach to artificial intelligence safety.
According to Bloomberg, the newly formed task force is preparing to begin discussions at a time when AI development is raising important questions about oversight and public protection.
The meeting represents an early step in the administration’s efforts to address concerns surrounding the rapidly developing technology.
Artificial intelligence is becoming more widely used across industries, including finance, healthcare, education and digital services.
As adoption increases, policymakers are facing questions about how to encourage innovation while managing potential risks.
However, the Bloomberg report does not establish what specific decisions, if any, will be announced following the task force’s first meeting.
Trump Administration Faces Growing AI Safety Pressure
The White House AI task force meeting comes amid heightened attention to the potential risks associated with advanced artificial intelligence systems.
Concerns surrounding AI include misinformation, cybersecurity threats, privacy protection and the reliability of automated decision-making.
These issues have increased pressure on policymakers to clarify how companies developing and deploying AI systems should address safety.
The Trump administration faces the challenge of balancing technological competitiveness with demands for appropriate safeguards.
AI companies continue to introduce increasingly capable systems, making questions about testing, transparency and accountability more relevant.
However, the creation of a task force does not automatically mean new regulations will be introduced.
Any policy changes would depend on the administration’s decisions and the legal authority available to implement them.
The task force’s membership, detailed agenda and possible recommendations were not specified in the information provided.
What the White House AI Task Force Could Mean
The first meeting of the White House AI task force could provide an indication of how the administration intends to approach AI safety.
Businesses developing artificial intelligence tools may be watching for signals about potential expectations surrounding risk management and responsible deployment.
The discussions could also attract attention from technology investors and companies working on AI infrastructure.
For the cryptocurrency industry, developments in AI policy may be relevant to businesses combining blockchain technology with automated systems.
However, the announcement does not indicate that cryptocurrency regulation will be part of the meeting.
It is also too early to determine whether the task force will recommend binding rules, voluntary standards or other measures.
The immediate development is that the White House is preparing to begin formal discussions through its newly established group.
LATEST: White House’s new AI task force is set to hold its first meeting on Thursday as the Trump administration faces mounting pressure to step up on AI safety, per Bloomberg. pic.twitter.com/VvOsO3iWJT
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) October 15, 2026
Thursday’s meeting will be an early test of how the Trump administration responds to growing pressure over AI safety.
Further announcements will be needed to understand whether those discussions lead to concrete policy action.
Read Also:
White House AI Task Force to Hold First Meeting Thursday
Bitcoin Whale Accumulation Grows as BTC Price Recovers
Bitcoin 50-Day Moving Average Faces Key Support Test
Binance ETH Long Liquidations Hit $106M in One Hour
Bitcoin ETF Outflows Hit $261M as Ethereum Loses $130M

Bitcoin’s largest holders are increasing their balances as BTC recovers.
Rising holdings alongside stronger prices suggest large investors may be absorbing available supply.
Whale accumulation could support the recovery, but it does not guarantee further price gains.
Bitcoin’s largest holders are increasing their exposure even after the cryptocurrency’s recent price recovery, according to an onchain market observation.
The trend suggests that major holders are continuing to build their Bitcoin balances rather than reducing their exposure as prices improve.
This behavior has attracted attention because large investors can influence the amount of BTC available in the market.
The analysis highlights a relationship between rising wallet balances and a strengthening Bitcoin price structure.
“Rising balances alongside a stronger price structure are consistent with supply absorption: large holders appear willing to retain more BTC after prices have already recovered.”
The observation points to growing confidence among major Bitcoin holders, although wallet activity alone cannot establish their intentions.
The latest Bitcoin whale accumulation trend suggests that large holders may be comfortable maintaining or increasing exposure at higher price levels.
Why Large Bitcoin Holders Are Absorbing Supply
Supply absorption occurs when market participants acquire available Bitcoin without immediately selling it back into the market.
When large holders increase their balances during a recovery, it can indicate that buying interest remains present despite rising prices.
This differs from situations where major investors use a price rebound primarily to reduce their holdings.
If accumulation continues, fewer coins may be available for immediate sale from the wallets being monitored.
However, rising balances do not automatically mean that the entire market is experiencing a supply shortage.
Bitcoin can also move between wallets for custody management, exchange operations or other reasons unrelated to fresh investment demand.
For that reason, analysts generally consider whale balance changes alongside price movements and other onchain indicators.
The reported combination of stronger prices and increasing large-holder balances is consistent with accumulation, but it is not definitive proof of new buying by every major investor.
Bitcoin’s Biggest Holders Are Building Exposure Into the Recovery
“Rising balances alongside a stronger price structure are consistent with supply absorption: large holders appear willing to retain more BTC after prices have already recovered.” – By @MorenoDV_ pic.twitter.com/CnJr18kmDj
— CryptoQuant.com (@cryptoquant_com) October 15, 2026
What Bitcoin Whale Accumulation Means for BTC
The latest Bitcoin whale accumulation trend could become an important indicator for Bitcoin’s ongoing recovery.
When major holders retain more BTC as prices rise, it may suggest that they expect the market to remain attractive over a longer period.
Sustained accumulation can also help absorb coins offered for sale by other market participants.
Still, Bitcoin’s future direction depends on more than the behavior of its largest wallets.
Spot market demand, institutional investment flows, liquidity conditions and broader economic developments can all influence price movements.
A sudden increase in selling activity could weaken the positive signal from whale balances.
Investors will therefore be watching whether large-holder balances continue rising and whether Bitcoin maintains its improved price structure.
The original observation did not specify the number of BTC accumulated or the exact wallet-size category used in the analysis.
For now, the central takeaway is that Bitcoin’s biggest holders appear to be building exposure into the recovery rather than stepping away from it.
If the pattern persists alongside steady demand, it could provide additional support for Bitcoin’s broader market recovery.

Bitcoin has returned to its 50-day moving average after a strong upward move.
A market analyst expects the technical support level to hold and BTC to resume its climb.
A sustained bounce could strengthen the bullish outlook, while a breakdown may signal further weakness.
Bitcoin is facing an important technical test as its price returns to the 50-day moving average (MA50) following a strong recovery from a previous market bottom.
According to a cryptocurrency market analyst, Bitcoin reclaimed its daily MA50 during its earlier upward move but had not meaningfully retested the indicator since then.
That has now changed, with BTC returning to the level that traders are watching as potential support.
The analyst expressed confidence that the retest could lead to another upward move.
“Now it did, and I think that this support will hold and continue to move up from here,” the analyst stated.
The Bitcoin 50-day moving average is a widely followed technical indicator that tracks the cryptocurrency’s average closing price over the previous 50 trading days.
Traders often use it to assess medium-term market direction and identify possible areas of support or resistance.
Why Bitcoin’s MA50 Support Matters
The latest retest could provide an important signal about the strength of Bitcoin’s recent recovery.
When an asset moves above a major moving average, that indicator can sometimes act as support during later pullbacks.
A successful retest occurs when the price approaches the indicator, attracts buying interest and begins moving higher again.
For Bitcoin, holding above the daily MA50 could suggest that buyers remain willing to defend the recent upward trend.
This would support the analyst’s expectation that BTC could continue climbing.
However, technical support levels are not guaranteed to hold.
Bitcoin could temporarily bounce before falling below the moving average, especially if broader market conditions weaken.
The original analysis did not provide a specific MA50 price level or a confirmed upside target.
As a result, the bullish outlook remains a technical expectation rather than a confirmed market outcome.
$BTC:
Since bottoming out and reclaiming the MA50 Daily, Bitcoin really never re-tested this level since the big upside move! Now it did, and I think that this support will hold and continue to move up from here pic.twitter.com/9e7A938FEv
— Doctor Profit (@DrProfitCrypto) October 15, 2026
What Comes Next for the Bitcoin 50-Day Moving Average?
The Bitcoin 50-day moving average will likely remain an important reference point for traders monitoring BTC’s next move.
A sustained recovery from the indicator could strengthen confidence that Bitcoin’s upward momentum remains intact.
Traders may watch for higher daily closes, improving buying volume and continued support above the moving average.
These developments could provide stronger evidence that the retest was successful.
On the other hand, a decisive move below the MA50 could weaken the bullish interpretation and encourage traders to examine lower support levels.
Market conditions beyond technical charts also matter.
Institutional demand, spot Bitcoin ETF flows and changes in broader financial markets can influence whether BTC maintains its recovery.
For now, the analyst remains optimistic that Bitcoin’s first meaningful MA50 retest since its major rally will hold.
The key question is whether buyers can defend the level and turn the current pullback into another upward move.

Binance recorded over $106 million in ETH long liquidations within one hour, the highest level in nearly six months.
Crypto futures trading volume is roughly nine times higher than spot volume, according to analyst Darkfost.
Reported expectations of another Federal Reserve rate hike rose from 17% to nearly 30% in one week.
Ethereum traders faced a sharp wave of forced position closures on Binance after hotter-than-expected U.S. inflation data unsettled cryptocurrency markets.
According to CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost, Binance recorded more than $106 million in Ethereum long liquidations within a single hour.
The event marked the largest hourly liquidation of ETH long positions on the exchange in nearly six months.
Long liquidations occur when traders betting on rising prices can no longer maintain their leveraged positions, triggering forced closures.
When prices fall rapidly, these liquidations can intensify selling pressure and accelerate market declines.
The latest Binance ETH long liquidations highlight how quickly unexpected economic developments can affect heavily leveraged cryptocurrency traders.
Crypto Futures Volume Reaches Nine Times Spot Trading
Darkfost also highlighted the growing dominance of derivatives trading in cryptocurrency markets.
According to his analysis, crypto futures trading volume is now approximately nine times spot trading volume.
This imbalance suggests that leveraged positions play a significant role in overall market activity.
Unlike spot trading, where investors purchase cryptocurrencies directly, futures contracts allow traders to gain exposure to price movements without owning the underlying assets.
Many futures traders use leverage to increase their market exposure.
Although leverage can amplify potential gains, it also increases the risk of rapid losses and forced liquidations.
When major economic announcements surprise investors, highly leveraged markets can react particularly sharply.
The recent Ethereum liquidation event demonstrates how quickly positions can unwind when market expectations shift.
However, a higher futures-to-spot trading ratio does not mean every derivatives position carries excessive leverage.
Binance ETH Long Liquidations Top $106 Million in One Hour, Highest in Six Months
According to CryptoQuant analyst @Darkfost_Coc , hotter-than-expected U.S. inflation triggered more than $106 million in ETH long liquidations on Binance, the world's largest crypto exchange by… pic.twitter.com/ucOexF9RyY
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) October 15, 2026
Fed Rate Hike Fears Add Pressure to Ethereum
The surge in Binance ETH long liquidations came alongside rising concerns about U.S. monetary policy.
Darkfost reported that market expectations of another Federal Reserve interest rate hike increased from approximately 17% to nearly 30% within one week.
Hotter-than-expected inflation can strengthen expectations that policymakers will maintain tighter financial conditions or consider additional rate increases.
Higher interest rates can weigh on risk-sensitive assets, including cryptocurrencies, as investors reassess borrowing costs and potential returns.
For Ethereum traders, these shifting expectations added pressure to an already volatile derivatives market.
Still, the reported probability represents market expectations rather than a confirmed Federal Reserve decision.
The latest liquidation figures also do not establish whether Ethereum will continue declining or experience a recovery.
For now, the combination of inflation concerns, shifting rate expectations and substantial derivatives activity has exposed the risks facing leveraged crypto traders.
More than $106 million in ETH long liquidations in one hour serves as a reminder that sudden macroeconomic shocks can produce significant losses across cryptocurrency futures markets

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $261 million in net outflows on October 14.
Bitwise’s BITB bucked the trend with $2.22 million in net inflows.
Spot Ethereum ETFs lost $130 million, with BlackRock’s ETHA accounting for $110 million in outflows.
U.S. spot cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds faced another difficult trading session on October 14, 2026, as Bitcoin and Ethereum investment products recorded substantial withdrawals.
According to data from SoSoValue, spot Bitcoin ETFs registered $261 million in net outflows, reflecting more capital leaving the funds than entering them during the session.
Despite the overall negative result, Bitwise’s Bitcoin ETF, BITB, attracted $2.22 million in net inflows.
The positive flow into BITB shows that investor activity was not uniformly negative across every Bitcoin fund.
However, inflows into individual products were insufficient to offset the broader withdrawals.
The latest figures highlight continued fluctuations in demand for cryptocurrency investment products among traditional market participants.
Ethereum ETFs Lose $130 Million as ETHA Leads Withdrawals
Ethereum spot ETFs also experienced significant selling pressure during the October 14 session.
According to SoSoValue, U.S. spot Ethereum ETFs recorded $130 million in net outflows.
BlackRock’s iShares Ethereum Trust ETF, ETHA, accounted for $110 million in withdrawals, representing approximately 85% of the category’s reported net outflow.
The figures indicate that ETHA played a major role in Ethereum’s negative daily ETF performance.
<text weight=”medium”>Spot ETF net flows — October 14, 2026</text>
ETF category or fundNet flowBitcoin spot ETFs-$261MBitwise BITB+$2.22MEthereum spot ETFs-$130MBlackRock ETHA-$110MCombined BTC and ETH ETFs-$391M
The individual fund figures are included within their respective ETF category totals and should not be added separately.
Together, Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs recorded approximately $391 million in combined net withdrawals.
According to SoSoValue, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $261 million in net outflows on October 14, with Bitwise's BITB posting the largest inflow at $2.22 million. Spot Ethereum ETFs saw $130 million in net outflows, led by BlackRock's ETHA with $110 million. pic.twitter.com/4HW9quMOVz
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) October 15, 2026
What Bitcoin ETF Outflows Mean for Crypto Markets
The latest Bitcoin ETF outflows provide another indication of shifting investor activity in cryptocurrency-linked investment products.
Spot ETFs allow investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin and Ethereum through traditional securities markets without directly managing cryptocurrency wallets.
When these funds experience net outflows, it generally indicates that redemptions exceeded new fund creations in value during the reporting period.
However, ETF withdrawals do not necessarily translate into equivalent declines in cryptocurrency prices.
Market performance also depends on spot trading activity, derivatives markets, liquidity and broader investor sentiment.
A single day of negative flows is not enough to confirm a sustained bearish trend.
Investors often examine several consecutive trading sessions to determine whether withdrawals reflect a broader change in demand.
For now, the October 14 figures show a clear pattern: Bitcoin ETFs lost $261 million, while Ethereum ETFs recorded $130 million in net outflows.
Despite BITB’s modest inflows, the overall session remained negative for both major cryptocurrency ETF categories.

ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood says “the turn is in here for Bitcoin.”
Her statement suggests growing confidence that Bitcoin could be approaching a market recovery.
A sustained bullish trend would still require stronger demand and confirmation from market activity.
Cathie Wood Bitcoin Outlook Signals a Potential Turn
ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood has expressed a bullish view on Bitcoin, suggesting that the cryptocurrency may be reaching an important turning point.
In a recent statement, Wood said:
“The turn is in here for Bitcoin.”
The comment has attracted attention because of her long-standing interest in Bitcoin and cryptocurrency-related investments.
Her latest remarks suggest that she sees conditions becoming more favorable for the world’s largest cryptocurrency.
However, the statement does not specify a Bitcoin price target or a timeline for a potential rally.
The Cathie Wood Bitcoin outlook reflects her assessment of market conditions rather than confirmation that Bitcoin has already entered a sustained upward trend.
For investors, the distinction matters because cryptocurrency prices can remain volatile even when prominent market participants express confidence.
BULLISH: ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood says “the turn is in here for Bitcoin." pic.twitter.com/9ib9stzFGi
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) October 14, 2026
ARK Invest CEO Sees Bullish Bitcoin Signals
Wood is widely known for leading ARK Invest, an investment management firm focused on disruptive technologies and innovation.
Her views on Bitcoin often attract attention from cryptocurrency traders and institutional investors.
The latest statement indicates that she believes the market may be approaching a shift in direction.
A market turning point generally refers to a period when an existing price trend begins to change.
For Bitcoin, that could mean a transition from weakness or consolidation toward stronger buying activity.
However, identifying such a shift in real time is difficult.
Temporary price rebounds can occur without developing into lasting recoveries.
The statement also does not establish which specific indicators Wood used to reach her conclusion.
As a result, investors should avoid treating the comment as a guarantee of future price gains.
What Cathie Wood Bitcoin Outlook Means for BTC
The Cathie Wood Bitcoin outlook adds another bullish perspective to ongoing discussions about Bitcoin’s next major market move.
Positive commentary from influential investors can shape market conversations, but actual price performance depends on broader trading conditions.
Factors such as spot Bitcoin ETF flows, institutional demand, liquidity and macroeconomic developments can all influence BTC’s direction.
Sustained buying pressure would provide stronger evidence of a recovery than a single optimistic statement.
Investors may also watch whether Bitcoin establishes higher price levels over time and maintains support during market pullbacks.
Still, Wood’s comments are notable because they suggest she believes the market may be nearing a meaningful change.
Her statement is concise but clear: she sees a potential turning point for Bitcoin.
Whether that view proves accurate will depend on how market demand and price action develop in the coming weeks.
For now, the ARK Invest CEO’s latest remarks have added a bullish voice to the conversation surrounding Bitcoin’s future direction.
Read Also:
Cathie Wood Bitcoin Outlook Turns Bullish on Recovery
Is Zcash a Good Investment in 2026? What ZEC Is, the Risks and Will It Be Banned
Payward to Buy Saldo Bank in Major Kraken Expansion
Standard Chartered Launches Bitcoin, Ether Trading in UAE
Older Bitcoin Movement Rises Amid Ledger Migration

Whether Zcash is a good investment depends on what you want from it, and nobody can tell you where its price will go. This is general information, not financial advice, and it makes no price predictions.
Here is what ZEC is, what could help or hurt it, and where the rules stand in October 2026.
What is Zcash?
Zcash launched in October 2016. Its supply is capped at 21,000,000 ZEC, and the block reward halves roughly every four years, most recently in November 2024.
Its defining feature is optional privacy. Zcash was the first coin to put zero-knowledge proofs, known as zk-SNARKs, to work for private payments.
There are two kinds of address:
Transparent addresses carry a t1 or t3 prefix. Anyone can read their balances and transfers on the blockchain, as with Bitcoin.
Shielded addresses encrypt who sent the coins, who got them and how much moved. Newer unified addresses begin with u1.
So a ZEC payment is only private when it uses shielded addresses.
Is Zcash better than Bitcoin?
Neither wins on every point. Compare the design, not the price chart.
Supply: both stop at 21,000,000 coins and halve the block reward about every four years.
Privacy: Bitcoin shows every transfer in public. Zcash lets you choose public or shielded.
Speed: Zcash produces a block roughly every 75 seconds, versus about 10 minutes on Bitcoin.
Track record: Bitcoin launched in 2009, Zcash in 2016.
If you want the option of private payments, Zcash offers something Bitcoin does not. If you never need privacy and value the longer history, Bitcoin may suit you better.
What could shape Zcash’s future
No one knows how ZEC will perform. Supporters point to a few factors, none of them a promise:
Demand for optional privacy. Most blockchains expose every balance to anyone who has the address. Some people want private payments, with public ones only when needed.
More shielded use. Zcash privacy only works when people shield their coins. Wallets with automatic shielding, such as Zodl (formerly Zashi), make that easier.
A known issuance schedule. The cap and halvings are set in the protocol, so new supply is predictable.
The risks
Price swings. ZEC can rise or fall sharply within days, like most crypto. Only put in money you can afford to lose.
Exchange delistings. In 2026, one large exchange stopped offering ZEC to people in India and the UAE.
New rules. Several countries already limit privacy coins on local exchanges, and the EU joins them in 2027.
User mistakes. ZEC left in a t1 or t3 address can be read on-chain like Bitcoin. A lost seed phrase means lost coins.
Will Zcash be banned?
Nobody can say what future laws will contain. So far, though, limits on privacy coins have targeted exchanges, not the people who own the coins.
Japan pushed its domestic exchanges to drop privacy coins from 2018. South Korea made it a requirement in 2021.
Dubai’s 2023 virtual asset rulebook bans activities that involve anonymity-enhanced cryptocurrencies.
New EU rules for crypto service providers take effect on 10 July 2027. EU crypto platforms then cannot offer accounts that hold or trade coins designed to conceal transaction details. Zcash and Monero both fall in that group.
Those EU rules cover platforms, not individuals or self-custody wallets. No US federal law bans owning Zcash. Laws differ by country, so check yours; this is not legal advice.
How to get ZEC without an account
If you already hold BTC, USDT or another coin, a swap gets you ZEC without signing up anywhere. GhostSwap (ghostswap.io) is an instant swap service that asks for no account, email address or ID documents for standard swaps.
Install Zodl (formerly Zashi) or another Zcash wallet, and write the seed phrase down offline.
Copy a t-address (prefix t1 or t3), because the swap pays out to transparent addresses.
Open ghostswap.io/zcash-exchange, choose what you are sending and set ZEC as the coin to get.
Check the quote. It shows the ZEC you can expect and the network fee, along with the smallest and biggest deposit the pair takes. No service fee is added on top of that estimate.
Paste your ZEC address and a refund address (the one you send from), then send the deposit.
Note the swap ID and watch the status page. A BTC deposit typically clears in 20 to 60 minutes.
After the ZEC arrives, shield the balance so your later payments stay private.
The rate floats, so the final ZEC amount is settled when your deposit confirms.
Questions people ask
Q: Is Zcash a good investment in 2026?
A: It depends on your goals and how much risk you accept. Prices swing, listings vary by country and rules are changing. This is not financial advice.
Q: Is Zcash better than Bitcoin?
A: Different rather than better. Zcash adds optional shielded payments and faster blocks; Bitcoin has the longer history.
Q: Will Zcash be banned in the EU?
A: From 10 July 2027, EU crypto platforms may not offer accounts holding privacy coins such as ZEC. Individuals and self-custody wallets sit outside those rules.
Q: Can I buy Zcash without an account?
A: Yes, by swapping a coin you already hold, for example BTC to ZEC. GhostSwap needs no account and sends ZEC to a transparent t-address, which you then shield in your wallet.
Disclosure: this post is sponsored by GhostSwap.
#Zcash #ZEC #Privacy #CryptoSwap $ZEC $BTC

Kraken’s parent company, Payward, is moving to acquire Lithuania’s Saldo Bank, according to the Financial Times.
The deal is intended to support expansion into lending and payment card services.
The acquisition could bring Payward further into traditional banking, although completion and rollout details remain unclear.
Payward, the parent company of cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, is moving to acquire Lithuania-based Saldo Bank, according to a report by the Financial Times.
The planned purchase marks a significant development in the company’s efforts to expand beyond cryptocurrency trading.
Through the acquisition, Payward aims to enter additional financial service areas, including lending and payment cards.
The move reflects a broader trend of cryptocurrency companies exploring opportunities within traditional financial services.
While crypto exchanges primarily focus on digital asset trading, banking-related products could allow companies to serve customers across a wider range of financial activities.
The Payward Saldo Bank acquisition could therefore become an important step in connecting cryptocurrency services with conventional banking infrastructure.
However, the reported transaction should not be treated as completed until the relevant conditions and approvals have been satisfied.
Kraken Parent Eyes Lending and Card Services
The planned acquisition could give Payward a stronger foundation for developing financial products beyond its existing cryptocurrency offerings.
Lending services would represent one possible area of expansion.
Traditional lending allows eligible borrowers to access funds under agreed repayment terms, although the specific products Payward intends to introduce have not been detailed.
Payment cards are another area highlighted in the report.
Card services could potentially help customers make payments through familiar financial networks while interacting with a broader financial platform.
However, the announcement does not establish whether any future cards would be linked directly to cryptocurrency balances.
Details about product eligibility, supported markets and launch timelines have not been confirmed in the information provided.
The proposed expansion highlights Payward’s interest in developing a more diversified financial services business.
NEW: Kraken parent Payward is buying Lithuania’s Saldo Bank to expand into lending and card services, FT reports. pic.twitter.com/ZZGx8fDbTI
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) October 14, 2026
What the Payward Saldo Bank Acquisition Means
The Payward Saldo Bank acquisition could strengthen the company’s presence in Europe’s financial services market.
Lithuania has become an important location for financial technology businesses operating within the European Union.
Acquiring an established banking institution may provide opportunities to develop new services within an existing regulatory framework.
However, owning a bank does not automatically authorize every proposed financial product or guarantee access across all European markets.
Any expansion would remain subject to applicable regulations, licensing requirements and operational arrangements.
For Kraken users, the potential benefits will depend on how Payward integrates Saldo Bank into its broader business.
The Financial Times report does not establish an acquisition price, a confirmed completion date or a timetable for launching lending and card products.
Those details will be important for understanding the transaction’s eventual impact.
For now, Payward’s planned purchase of Saldo Bank signals an effort to move beyond crypto trading and build a wider financial services offering.
The development also illustrates how the boundaries between digital asset platforms and traditional banking continue to evolve.

Standard Chartered has launched Bitcoin and Ether trading services for eligible professional investors in the UAE.
Qualified clients can access crypto trading through their existing bank accounts.
The service expands access to digital assets within a traditional banking environment.
Global banking giant Standard Chartered has launched Bitcoin and Ether trading services in the United Arab Emirates, offering eligible professional investors a new way to access cryptocurrencies.
The service allows qualified clients to trade Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) through their existing Standard Chartered bank accounts.
The development marks another step in the integration of digital assets into traditional financial services.
Instead of relying entirely on a separate cryptocurrency exchange relationship, eligible investors can access the supported digital assets through their established banking arrangements.
The launch also highlights the UAE’s growing role as a market for financial institutions developing cryptocurrency-related products.
However, the new offering is not intended for all customers.
Access is specifically limited to professional investors who meet the bank’s eligibility requirements.
Bitcoin and Ether Trading Through Existing Bank Accounts
The Standard Chartered crypto trading service focuses on two of the largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization.
Bitcoin is widely recognized as the first cryptocurrency, while Ether powers transactions and applications across the Ethereum blockchain.
Both assets have attracted attention from institutional and professional investors seeking exposure to digital asset markets.
The new service allows eligible Standard Chartered clients in the UAE to trade these cryptocurrencies using their existing banking relationship.
This approach may simplify access for investors who already use the bank’s financial services.
It also reflects increasing interest among traditional financial institutions in offering digital asset products alongside conventional banking services.
However, cryptocurrency trading still involves significant risks.
Bitcoin and Ether prices can experience sharp fluctuations, and access through a regulated financial institution does not eliminate the possibility of investment losses.
The bank’s announcement does not establish that the service is available to ordinary retail banking customers.
JUST IN: Standard Chartered launches Bitcoin and Ether trading through existing bank accounts for eligible professional investors in the UAE. pic.twitter.com/nfQeGR0DFI
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) October 14, 2026
What Standard Chartered Crypto Trading Means for UAE
The launch represents another development in the UAE’s expanding digital asset sector.
The country has attracted growing interest from cryptocurrency businesses and established financial institutions exploring blockchain-based financial services.
By introducing Bitcoin and Ether trading for eligible professional investors, Standard Chartered is adding digital asset exposure to its existing banking offering.
The move could appeal to qualified clients who prefer accessing cryptocurrencies through a familiar financial institution.
However, Standard Chartered crypto trading should not be confused with unrestricted cryptocurrency access for every account holder.
Eligibility requirements, product conditions and applicable regulations will determine who can use the service.
The announcement also does not specify whether additional cryptocurrencies will be supported in the future.
For now, the key development is clear: Standard Chartered has introduced Bitcoin and Ether trading in the UAE for eligible professional investors, allowing them to access the assets through their existing bank accounts.
The launch highlights how cryptocurrency services are becoming increasingly connected with traditional banking infrastructure.

Previously inactive Bitcoin holdings are showing renewed movement on the blockchain.
Analysts caution that older BTC transfers do not necessarily indicate selling or profit-taking.
A possible Ledger wallet migration could contribute to additional movement in the coming days.
Previously inactive Bitcoin holdings are moving again, attracting attention from traders and blockchain analysts monitoring long-term holder activity.
The renewed older Bitcoin movement has raised questions about whether investors are preparing to sell their holdings or simply reorganizing their wallets.
Bitcoin that has remained untouched for extended periods often attracts market interest when it suddenly changes addresses.
These transactions can involve coins held by long-term investors, early adopters or users transferring funds between storage solutions.
However, a blockchain transfer does not automatically indicate that Bitcoin has been sold.
An analyst discussing the latest activity emphasized this distinction:
“Movement doesn’t necessarily mean selling or profit-taking. The Ledger migration might amplify this movement over the coming days.”
The observation suggests that some of the activity could be connected to wallet management rather than a change in investors’ market outlook.
Ledger Migration Could Increase BTC Transfers
One possible explanation for the renewed activity is a Ledger wallet migration.
Ledger is a hardware wallet provider whose devices allow cryptocurrency holders to manage private keys and authorize transactions.
When users migrate Bitcoin between wallets or update their custody arrangements, their coins may move to new blockchain addresses.
These transactions are visible on the Bitcoin network, even when the underlying ownership remains unchanged.
As a result, wallet migrations can create noticeable increases in onchain activity without necessarily adding selling pressure to the market.
The analyst suggested that Ledger-related migration activity could amplify older BTC transfers over the coming days.
However, the available information does not establish how much of the recent movement is directly attributable to Ledger users.
Additional onchain evidence would be needed to confirm the scale and causes of the transfers.
Older BTC Is on the Move Again
“Movement doesn't necessarily mean selling or profit-taking. The Ledger migration might amplify this movement over the coming days.” – By @nocoffeenobrain pic.twitter.com/p6GGP6oTbD
— CryptoQuant.com (@cryptoquant_com) October 14, 2026
What Older Bitcoin Movement Means for BTC
The latest older Bitcoin movement highlights why blockchain activity requires careful interpretation.
Transfers involving long-dormant coins can sometimes precede selling, particularly when Bitcoin moves toward cryptocurrency exchanges.
However, movements between private wallets may simply reflect security upgrades, custody changes or routine asset management.
The destination of the transferred Bitcoin is therefore an important detail.
Analysts often monitor whether older coins are sent to exchange-associated addresses or remain within self-custody wallets.
Even then, an exchange deposit does not guarantee that a sale will occur.
For investors, the key takeaway is that increased movement alone is not sufficient evidence of profit-taking.
The possible Ledger migration adds another factor that could influence onchain activity in the near term.
Until clearer information becomes available, older Bitcoin movement should be treated as a signal worth monitoring rather than proof of an approaching sell-off.

Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded $175.62 million in net inflows on October 13.
Ethereum spot ETFs attracted $24.84 million, while Solana funds lost $1.04 million.
Combined net inflows across the three ETF categories reached $199.42 million.
Spot cryptocurrency exchange-traded funds recorded a mixed trading session on October 13, 2026, with Bitcoin and Ethereum attracting fresh capital while Solana experienced withdrawals.
According to the reported figures, Bitcoin spot ETFs received $175.62 million in net inflows, leading the three cryptocurrency categories.
Ethereum funds also posted positive flows, bringing in $24.84 million during the session.
However, Solana spot ETFs moved in the opposite direction, recording $1.04 million in net outflows.
Together, the three categories generated $199.42 million in combined net inflows.
The positive overall result was largely driven by Bitcoin, which accounted for the majority of the capital entering these investment products.
The latest October 13 ETF flows highlight the differences in investor activity across major cryptocurrency funds.
Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs Attract Fresh Capital
Bitcoin was the clear leader during the October 13 trading session.
Its $175.62 million in net inflows represented approximately 88% of the combined positive inflows into Bitcoin and Ethereum funds.
Ethereum contributed the remaining $24.84 million.
<text weight=”medium”>Spot ETF net flows — October 13, 2026</text>
CryptocurrencyNet ETF FlowBitcoin (BTC)+$175.62MEthereum (ETH)+$24.84MSolana (SOL)-$1.04MCombined net flow+$199.42M
The figures show that investor demand was concentrated in Bitcoin-related products.
Ethereum also experienced net buying interest, although its inflows were considerably smaller.
Meanwhile, Solana’s $1.04 million withdrawal indicates that more money left its spot ETFs than entered them during the reporting period.
However, the difference in flows does not necessarily mean that investors expect one cryptocurrency to outperform another.
ETF activity can be influenced by several factors, including portfolio adjustments, trading strategies and changing market conditions.
ETF FLOWS: BTC and ETH spot ETFs saw net inflows on Oct. 13, while SOL spot ETFs saw net outflows.
BTC: $175.62M
ETH: $24.84M
SOL: – $1.04M pic.twitter.com/HLzGNx4oxw
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) October 14, 2026
What October 13 ETF Flows Mean for Crypto Markets
The October 13 ETF flows provide a snapshot of demand for cryptocurrency investment products traded through traditional financial markets.
Spot ETFs allow investors to gain exposure to digital assets without directly managing cryptocurrency wallets.
Positive net flows indicate that fund creations exceeded redemptions in value during the session, while negative flows reflect the opposite.
Although Bitcoin and Ethereum recorded inflows, one positive trading day does not guarantee a sustained recovery in institutional demand.
Similarly, Solana’s modest outflows do not establish a longer-term decline in investor interest.
Market participants often examine ETF activity over several sessions to identify more meaningful trends.
For now, the latest data shows Bitcoin leading with $175.62 million in inflows, followed by Ethereum’s $24.84 million.
Despite Solana’s $1.04 million withdrawal, the three categories finished October 13 with nearly $200 million in combined net inflows.

Coinbase is urging Bitcoin developers to begin preparing for future quantum computing threats.
The exchange supports a staged, multi-year migration to quantum-resistant digital signatures.
Coinbase wants everyday wallets protected while keeping the debate over lost and Satoshi-era Bitcoin separate.
Coinbase is calling for Bitcoin to begin preparing for the potential security challenges posed by quantum computers, arguing that the network should not wait until the threat becomes immediate.
The cryptocurrency exchange supports a gradual transition toward quantum-resistant digital signatures, which could help protect Bitcoin transactions against future advances in computing technology.
Bitcoin currently relies on cryptographic systems that are considered secure against conventional computers. However, sufficiently powerful quantum computers could eventually challenge some of the mathematical protections used in digital signatures.
This does not mean Bitcoin’s security has already been broken.
Instead, Coinbase’s position focuses on preparing the network before quantum computing becomes a practical threat.
The company believes Bitcoin quantum resistance should be developed through careful planning rather than a rushed emergency upgrade.
Coinbase Proposes Multi-Year Quantum-Safe Migration
A central part of Coinbase’s proposal is a staged migration lasting several years.
Rather than changing Bitcoin’s cryptographic protections all at once, the exchange favors a gradual process that gives developers, wallet providers and users time to adapt.
Quantum-resistant signatures would replace or supplement vulnerable signing methods with alternatives designed to withstand attacks from powerful quantum computers.
However, introducing new signature systems into Bitcoin would require significant technical work.
Developers would need to consider transaction sizes, network compatibility, wallet functionality and the security of any proposed cryptographic alternatives.
Coinbase also emphasizes that the transition should remain safe and practical for everyday Bitcoin users.
That means wallet owners should have clear ways to protect their funds without facing unnecessary complexity or avoidable risks.
The broader goal is to strengthen Bitcoin’s long-term security while preserving its usability.
NEW: Coinbase says the network should start preparing for quantum computers now through a staged, multi-year migration to quantum-resistant signatures.
It also wants the upgrade to stay safe for everyday wallets, while leaving the question of lost and Satoshi-era coins for a… pic.twitter.com/4PgUlOiFIB
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) October 14, 2026
What Happens to Lost and Satoshi-Era Bitcoin?
One of the most sensitive questions surrounding Bitcoin quantum resistance involves coins that may never be moved.
Some older Bitcoin holdings, including coins associated with Bitcoin’s earliest years, could face different exposure to future cryptographic threats depending on how their public keys have been revealed.
This has raised difficult questions about whether the network should eventually introduce special rules for potentially vulnerable coins.
Coinbase believes that discussion should remain separate from the immediate work of developing quantum-resistant signatures.
The distinction matters because deciding how to handle lost or inactive Bitcoin involves broader questions about ownership, property rights and Bitcoin’s underlying principles.
Those debates could become contentious if tied directly to a security upgrade.
For now, Coinbase’s message is focused on preparation.
Quantum computers are not currently known to be capable of breaking Bitcoin’s signatures at the scale required for a practical attack, but upgrading a global decentralized network could take years.
Starting the process early, Coinbase argues, would give Bitcoin more time to develop, test and adopt secure solutions before quantum computing poses a serious risk.

Bank of England Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden sees no immediate need to introduce a digital pound.
Stablecoins and tokenized bank deposits could provide alternative forms of digital money.
The comments suggest the UK is considering multiple approaches to modernizing payments.
The Bank of England is showing little urgency to introduce a digital pound, with Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden pointing to other emerging forms of digital money.
According to Bloomberg, Breeden believes stablecoins and tokenized bank deposits could offer alternatives to a central bank digital currency.
Her comments come as financial institutions continue exploring how blockchain technology could change the way money moves between consumers, businesses and banks.
A digital pound would be a form of central bank digital currency, commonly known as a CBDC, issued by the Bank of England.
Unlike private cryptocurrencies, it would represent money issued by the central bank.
However, Breeden’s remarks suggest that launching such a currency is not necessarily the only way to improve the UK’s digital payment infrastructure.
The discussion reflects a broader debate about whether central banks need to issue their own digital currencies when private-sector alternatives are developing.
Stablecoins and Tokenized Deposits Offer Alternatives
One reason the digital pound may not require an immediate launch is the emergence of other digital payment technologies.
Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to maintain a relatively stable value, often by tracking currencies such as the US dollar or British pound.
They can support digital transfers and payments, although their reliability depends on factors such as reserve backing, redemption arrangements and regulatory oversight.
Tokenized deposits work differently.
They represent commercial bank deposits using digital tokens, potentially allowing banks to transfer and settle funds through newer financial infrastructure.
Unlike a central bank digital currency, tokenized deposits remain liabilities of the issuing commercial bank.
Both approaches could help modernize payment systems without requiring the Bank of England to introduce a retail CBDC immediately.
However, these alternatives are not identical in terms of legal structure, risk or consumer protection
JUST IN: Bank of England’s Sarah Breeden sees no rush for a digital pound, citing stablecoins and tokenized deposits as alternatives, per Bloomberg. pic.twitter.com/8yBRoCizxg
— Cointelegraph (@Cointelegraph) October 13, 2026
What This Means for the UK’s Digital Pound Plans
Breeden’s comments suggest that the future of digital payments in Britain may involve several technologies rather than one government-issued solution.
The Bank of England has previously explored the possibility of a retail CBDC as part of its work on the future of money.
However, the latest remarks should not be interpreted as a formal cancellation of the project.
A decision to introduce a digital pound would require further policy development and consideration of its potential benefits and risks.
Meanwhile, stablecoins and tokenized deposits could continue gaining attention as financial institutions experiment with blockchain-based payment systems.
For consumers and businesses, the key questions will involve safety, accessibility, transaction efficiency and regulatory protections.
The development also highlights how central banks are evaluating their roles in an increasingly digital financial system.
For now, Sarah Breeden’s position indicates that the Bank of England sees no immediate rush to launch a digital pound, particularly while alternative forms of digital money continue to evolve.

Bitcoin exchange supply continues to shrink, suggesting fewer BTC are being held on trading platforms.
Analysts say stronger buying demand alongside lower exchange balances could support Bitcoin’s price.
A sustained upward trend would still depend on actual demand growth and broader market conditions.
Bitcoin is showing another potentially important market signal as the amount of BTC held on cryptocurrency exchanges continues to decrease.
The decline in Bitcoin exchange supply has attracted attention because exchange balances are often used to assess the amount of cryptocurrency readily available for trading.
When investors withdraw Bitcoin from exchanges, they may be transferring their holdings into private wallets, institutional custody or long-term storage.
This can reduce the amount of BTC immediately available on trading platforms.
However, declining exchange balances do not automatically mean investors are accumulating Bitcoin for the long term.
Transfers can occur for several reasons, including changes in custody arrangements and movements between trading venues.
Even so, the continued reduction in exchange-held BTC has become an important indicator for traders monitoring Bitcoin’s market structure.
Lower Bitcoin Exchange Supply Could Support Prices
The relationship between available supply and buying demand is central to the latest market outlook.
According to the analysis:
“If buying demand continues to improve while exchange supply remains low, BTC could benefit from a supply-demand imbalance, creating favorable conditions for a longer-term upward trend.”
The statement suggests that a combination of stronger demand and fewer readily available coins could create supportive conditions for Bitcoin.
If buyers become more active while exchange balances remain low, competition for available BTC may increase.
Such conditions can potentially contribute to upward price pressure.
However, the outcome depends on whether buying demand actually strengthens and remains consistent.
A decline in exchange holdings alone is not enough to confirm a bullish market trend.
Bitcoin’s price can still fall if selling pressure increases or investor demand weakens.
BTC Supply on Exchanges Continues to Shrink
“If buying demand continues to improve while exchange supply remains low, bitcoin:native could benefit from a supply-demand imbalance, creating favorable conditions for a longer-term upward trend.” – By @Satoureireal pic.twitter.com/YkcqyjtscD
— CryptoQuant.com (@cryptoquant_com) October 13, 2026
What Shrinking Bitcoin Exchange Supply Means for BTC
The ongoing decline in Bitcoin exchange supply provides a useful signal for investors assessing potential changes in market conditions.
Lower exchange balances may indicate that some holders are choosing to keep their Bitcoin outside trading platforms rather than making it immediately available for sale.
Meanwhile, sustained demand from spot buyers and investment products could strengthen the case for a longer-term recovery.
Traders may also monitor spot Bitcoin ETF flows, trading volumes and broader market liquidity to evaluate whether demand is improving.
These indicators can help distinguish a temporary price rebound from a more sustainable trend.
Importantly, the latest analysis presents a conditional outlook rather than a confirmed prediction.
Bitcoin would need continued demand growth alongside relatively limited available supply for the suggested imbalance to develop.
For now, shrinking Bitcoin exchange supply remains a potentially constructive market signal, but stronger buying activity will be essential to determine whether BTC can establish a lasting upward trend.