Binance Square

circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet

Просмотров: 153,593
1,565 обсуждают
SoS Team
·
--
Picture this: an exploiter drains millions from an exchange and attempts to wash the funds across DeFi protocols, only to find their wallets frozen mid-transit. Most traders treat stablecoins as safe cash equivalents, forgetting that centralized asset issuers hold unilateral control over blacklist functions. When an exploit hits and emergency freezes ripple through liquidity pools, ordinary users frequently get caught in collateral freezes or sudden depeg panic. The recent freeze of the Bitget hacker wallet by Circle and Tether demonstrates how swiftly centralized issuers can coordinate with law enforcement and exchanges. While this intervention protects stolen assets and prevents the attacker from dumping tokens into liquidity pools, it serves as a stark reminder of underlying counterparty risk. On-chain transparency cuts both ways, and holding assets like $USDT means you are always operating within permissioned rails, regardless of overall market sentiment. Even as capital rotates across major networks like $NEAR, blacklisting capabilities remain the ultimate circuit breaker in centralized DeFi infrastructure. How are you balancing asset safety and centralization risk in your portfolio management? #CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #BitgetHackerMoves
Picture this: an exploiter drains millions from an exchange and attempts to wash the funds across DeFi protocols, only to find their wallets frozen mid-transit.

Most traders treat stablecoins as safe cash equivalents, forgetting that centralized asset issuers hold unilateral control over blacklist functions. When an exploit hits and emergency freezes ripple through liquidity pools, ordinary users frequently get caught in collateral freezes or sudden depeg panic.

The recent freeze of the Bitget hacker wallet by Circle and Tether demonstrates how swiftly centralized issuers can coordinate with law enforcement and exchanges. While this intervention protects stolen assets and prevents the attacker from dumping tokens into liquidity pools, it serves as a stark reminder of underlying counterparty risk.

On-chain transparency cuts both ways, and holding assets like $USDT means you are always operating within permissioned rails, regardless of overall market sentiment. Even as capital rotates across major networks like $NEAR , blacklisting capabilities remain the ultimate circuit breaker in centralized DeFi infrastructure.

How are you balancing asset safety and centralization risk in your portfolio management?

#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #BitgetHackerMoves
Here is what happened when an on-chain sleuth noticed millions in stolen assets suddenly waking up from a dormant wallet. Most traders get caught up chasing green candles during peak greed cycles, completely ignoring the massive counterparty and security risks that still plague centralized ecosystems. When illicit funds move, the resulting panic selling and sudden liquidity drains can wreck your portfolio before you even realize what hit the order book. Looking at the latest movements from the Bitget exploiter, we are seeing a familiar playbook unfold. Instead of a messy cash-out, the hacker is systematically splitting funds and washing them across decentralized protocols, trying to evade blacklists before stablecoin issuers step in. We saw the exact same pattern during past exchange breaches, where the race between wallet blacklists and mixers dictated market contagion. While major issuers have frozen portions in $USDT, sophisticated actors always find routing paths through privacy layers and alternative networks. Even ecosystems seeing institutional interest like $NEAR or older legacy chains like $ETC feel the ripple effects when market makers pull liquidity to protect themselves from tainted funds. The key takeaway from this case study is that on-chain transparency cuts both ways: law enforcement tracks every hop, but the entire market trades on that anxiety in real time. How do you usually manage your risk exposure when major exploit wallets start moving funds on-chain? #BitgetHackerMoves #CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet
Here is what happened when an on-chain sleuth noticed millions in stolen assets suddenly waking up from a dormant wallet.

Most traders get caught up chasing green candles during peak greed cycles, completely ignoring the massive counterparty and security risks that still plague centralized ecosystems. When illicit funds move, the resulting panic selling and sudden liquidity drains can wreck your portfolio before you even realize what hit the order book.

Looking at the latest movements from the Bitget exploiter, we are seeing a familiar playbook unfold. Instead of a messy cash-out, the hacker is systematically splitting funds and washing them across decentralized protocols, trying to evade blacklists before stablecoin issuers step in. We saw the exact same pattern during past exchange breaches, where the race between wallet blacklists and mixers dictated market contagion. While major issuers have frozen portions in $USDT, sophisticated actors always find routing paths through privacy layers and alternative networks.

Even ecosystems seeing institutional interest like $NEAR or older legacy chains like $ETC feel the ripple effects when market makers pull liquidity to protect themselves from tainted funds. The key takeaway from this case study is that on-chain transparency cuts both ways: law enforcement tracks every hop, but the entire market trades on that anxiety in real time.

How do you usually manage your risk exposure when major exploit wallets start moving funds on-chain?

#BitgetHackerMoves #CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet
everyone thinks once a hacker drains a cex the coins are gone for good but actually this bitget situation is showing how fast the net is closing. leaving size on an exchange while greed sits at 70 is how people keep getting wrecked. you dont even get a chance to hit withdraw when the drain happens overnight. look at the bitget hacker moves as a live case study. they started shuffling funds and circle and tether froze the wallet almost immediately. any $USDT that touched those addresses is basically radioactive now. ngl i keep seeing people still bridging and swapping without checking if theyre interacting with tainted liquidity. thats how you lose access to your own money ser. the freeze is a warning not a victory lap. meanwhile the timeline is busy chasing $NEAR etf headlines and $POL rotations like none of this is happening. the risk is not the hack itself anymore. its complacency. anyone else watching these wallets or are we just gonna pretend cexs are still the easy button? #BitgetHackerMoves #CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #BitwiseFilesFinalNEARSpotETFProspectus
everyone thinks once a hacker drains a cex the coins are gone for good but actually this bitget situation is showing how fast the net is closing.

leaving size on an exchange while greed sits at 70 is how people keep getting wrecked. you dont even get a chance to hit withdraw when the drain happens overnight.

look at the bitget hacker moves as a live case study. they started shuffling funds and circle and tether froze the wallet almost immediately. any $USDT that touched those addresses is basically radioactive now.

ngl i keep seeing people still bridging and swapping without checking if theyre interacting with tainted liquidity. thats how you lose access to your own money ser. the freeze is a warning not a victory lap.

meanwhile the timeline is busy chasing $NEAR etf headlines and $POL rotations like none of this is happening. the risk is not the hack itself anymore. its complacency.

anyone else watching these wallets or are we just gonna pretend cexs are still the easy button?
#BitgetHackerMoves #CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #BitwiseFilesFinalNEARSpotETFProspectus
BITGET HACK · WHAT COULD BE FROZEN $387.5M left Bitget's hot wallets on 24 Sep. The part anyone could freeze: about $318K. Circle and Tether blacklisted one exploiter wallet holding 218K USDT and 100K USDC. That is roughly 0.08% of the haul. The rest sits where no issuer reaches: 63,000+ $ETH across other exploiter addresses, and 103M $XRP, of which 54M (about $83M) has already moved to fresh wallets. Native coins cannot be frozen at the protocol level. The one choke point left is an exchange deposit. Bitget says cold wallets were untouched and its $464M protection fund covers the loss. A freeze button on stablecoins: safety net, or a flaw in the model? #CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #BitgetHackerMoves$83MStolenXRP $ETH $XRP
BITGET HACK · WHAT COULD BE FROZEN

$387.5M left Bitget's hot wallets on 24 Sep. The part anyone could freeze: about $318K.

Circle and Tether blacklisted one exploiter wallet holding 218K USDT and 100K USDC. That is roughly 0.08% of the haul.

The rest sits where no issuer reaches: 63,000+ $ETH across other exploiter addresses, and 103M $XRP , of which 54M (about $83M) has already moved to fresh wallets. Native coins cannot be frozen at the protocol level. The one choke point left is an exchange deposit.

Bitget says cold wallets were untouched and its $464M protection fund covers the loss.

A freeze button on stablecoins: safety net, or a flaw in the model?

#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #BitgetHackerMoves$83MStolenXRP $ETH $XRP
🔒 Stablecoins Frozen — But ETH Keeps Moving Circle and Tether moved against a Bitget-exploiter wallet holding roughly 218K $USDT and 100K $USDC. The incident highlights an important difference between issuer-controlled stablecoins and native assets like $ETH. Spot investors should watch on-chain flows before making decisions. 📈 #circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet
🔒 Stablecoins Frozen — But ETH Keeps Moving
Circle and Tether moved against a Bitget-exploiter wallet holding roughly 218K $USDT and 100K $USDC.
The incident highlights an important difference between issuer-controlled stablecoins and native assets like $ETH.
Spot investors should watch on-chain flows before making decisions. 📈

#circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet
#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet Circle, Tether Freeze Bitget Hacker Wallet Circle and Tether have frozen roughly $318,000 in USDC and USDT linked to the hacker behind the September 24 Bitget security breach. Circle blacklisted the Ethereum address first, followed by Tether, preventing the stablecoins in that wallet from being transferred. � CoinDesk +1 The freeze represents only a small portion of the funds involved. Bitget initially estimated the unauthorized transfers at $351.6 million, later revising the total affected assets to approximately $387.5 million after accounting for additional assets on Zcash and TRON. � The Block +1 Most of the stolen assets cannot be frozen by Circle or Tether because they are held in cryptocurrencies such as ETH and XRP, rather than issuer-controlled stablecoins. Blockchain tracking showed tens of thousands of ETH and large amounts of XRP remaining in attacker-controlled wallets. � Bitquery +1 Bitget says the incident was contained, its underlying vulnerability was remediated, and it has launched a recovery-bounty program to help trace and recover the affected funds. � Bitget$NVDA.US $AAPL.US
#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet Circle, Tether Freeze Bitget Hacker Wallet
Circle and Tether have frozen roughly $318,000 in USDC and USDT linked to the hacker behind the September 24 Bitget security breach. Circle blacklisted the Ethereum address first, followed by Tether, preventing the stablecoins in that wallet from being transferred. �
CoinDesk +1
The freeze represents only a small portion of the funds involved. Bitget initially estimated the unauthorized transfers at $351.6 million, later revising the total affected assets to approximately $387.5 million after accounting for additional assets on Zcash and TRON. �
The Block +1
Most of the stolen assets cannot be frozen by Circle or Tether because they are held in cryptocurrencies such as ETH and XRP, rather than issuer-controlled stablecoins. Blockchain tracking showed tens of thousands of ETH and large amounts of XRP remaining in attacker-controlled wallets. �
Bitquery +1
Bitget says the incident was contained, its underlying vulnerability was remediated, and it has launched a recovery-bounty program to help trace and recover the affected funds. �
Bitget$NVDA.US $AAPL.US
USDC+0,04%
AAPLUS-0,07%
NVDAUS+0,04%
#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet ​🚨 Circle & Tether Freeze Bitget Hacker Wallet 🚨 ​Major stablecoin issuers are stepping up! Circle and Tether have successfully blacklisted a wallet linked to the recent Bitget exploit, freezing approximately $318,000 in USDC and $USDT . According to on-chain data, Circle took the lead by freezing their tokens first, followed by Tether a few hours later. ​However, this is only a tiny fraction of the massive $387.5 million estimated to have been stolen. ​The Challenge: More than 63,000 $ETH remains untouched in other wallets controlled by the exploiter. ​The Reality: Unlike centralized stablecoins, native assets like Ethereum (ETH) cannot be frozen by any single issuer, highlighting the fundamental difference between these two types of digital assets.
#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet
​🚨 Circle & Tether Freeze Bitget Hacker Wallet 🚨
​Major stablecoin issuers are stepping up! Circle and Tether have successfully blacklisted a wallet linked to the recent Bitget exploit, freezing approximately $318,000 in USDC and $USDT . According to on-chain data, Circle took the lead by freezing their tokens first, followed by Tether a few hours later.
​However, this is only a tiny fraction of the massive $387.5 million estimated to have been stolen.
​The Challenge: More than 63,000 $ETH remains untouched in other wallets controlled by the exploiter.
​The Reality: Unlike centralized stablecoins, native assets like Ethereum (ETH) cannot be frozen by any single issuer, highlighting the fundamental difference between these two types of digital assets.
·
--
Рост
#circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet 🚨 Security Alert: Circle & Tether Intercept Exploiter Address Following Bitget Breach 🛡️ Rapid security coordination on-chain! Following a security incident where Bitget's backend wallet infrastructure was compromised, major stablecoin issuers Circle and Tether took swift action to blacklist and freeze an address labeled "Bitget Exploiter 8". The joint response immobilized approximately $318,000 in stablecoins (99,990 USDC and 218,023 USDT) held in the targeted wallet, cutting off those specific assets from being laundered across secondary platforms. $ZEC {future}(ZECUSDT) 💡 Key Highlights: 🛑 Swift Blacklisting: Circle and Tether executed smart contract freezes within hours of security alerts from security firm MistTrack. ⚖️ Limits of On-Chain Freezes: While stablecoin issuers can freeze fiat-backed tokens (USDC/USDT), decentralized assets like Ethereum cannot be frozen. Trackers note that the attacker quickly converted a significant portion of stolen assets into ETH. 🛡️ Full Protection Covered: Bitget CEO Gracy Chen confirmed that private keys were not leaked and user assets are fully protected through Bitget's User Protection Fund (valued at over $400M). What is your take on centralized stablecoin freezes—a vital safety net during exchange breaches or a reminder of central control in crypto? Share your view below! 👇 #CircleMints500MUSDCOnSolana #Bitget
#circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet
🚨 Security Alert: Circle & Tether Intercept Exploiter Address Following Bitget Breach 🛡️
Rapid security coordination on-chain! Following a security incident where Bitget's backend wallet infrastructure was compromised, major stablecoin issuers Circle and Tether took swift action to blacklist and freeze an address labeled "Bitget Exploiter 8".

The joint response immobilized approximately $318,000 in stablecoins (99,990 USDC and 218,023 USDT) held in the targeted wallet, cutting off those specific assets from being laundered across secondary platforms.
$ZEC
💡 Key Highlights:
🛑 Swift Blacklisting: Circle and Tether executed smart contract freezes within hours of security alerts from security firm MistTrack.

⚖️ Limits of On-Chain Freezes: While stablecoin issuers can freeze fiat-backed tokens (USDC/USDT), decentralized assets like Ethereum cannot be frozen. Trackers note that the attacker quickly converted a significant portion of stolen assets into ETH.

🛡️ Full Protection Covered: Bitget CEO Gracy Chen confirmed that private keys were not leaked and user assets are fully protected through Bitget's User Protection Fund (valued at over $400M).

What is your take on centralized stablecoin freezes—a vital safety net during exchange breaches or a reminder of central control in crypto? Share your view below! 👇

#CircleMints500MUSDCOnSolana #Bitget
·
--
Рост
#circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet 🚨 Stablecoin Issuers Circle & Tether Freeze Funds Linked to Bitget Exploit In a swift response to the recent Bitget security breach, major stablecoin issuers have stepped in to blacklist a hacker’s wallet. Here is a clear breakdown of the latest developments and what it means for the broader crypto ecosystem. 📌 The Core News • Circle and Tether have jointly blacklisted a wallet identified by security firms as "Bitget Exploiter 8" [[4]]. • This coordinated action successfully froze approximately $318,000 in stablecoins, consisting of roughly 218,023 USDT and 99,990 USDC [[13]]. • Notably, this frozen amount represents less than 0.1% of the total reported loss. The attacker had already swapped the majority of the stolen funds (including over 63,000 ETH) into decentralized, non-freezable assets before the blacklist was applied [[14]]. 📊 Market & Ecosystem Impact • Stablecoin Utility in Action This event highlights the centralized response capability of fiat-backed stablecoin issuers to actively mitigate crypto-related crimes and assist in on-chain investigations. • Recovery Challenges It underscores a critical security reality: once funds are converted into native, non-freezable blockchain assets (like ETH), recovery becomes significantly more complex for centralized entities. • Industry Cooperation The rapid coordination between blockchain security firms, exchanges, and stablecoin issuers demonstrates a maturing, collaborative ecosystem response to large-scale exploits. 💬 Join the Discussion Do you believe stablecoin issuers should have the ability to freeze funds to combat hacks, or does this centralized power conflict with the decentralized ethos of crypto? Share your perspective in the comments below! 👇 🔖 Hashtags #CryptoSecurity #USDT #USDC #Bitget #Web3 This is for educational purposes only. Not Financial Advice (NFA). Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR). $RAY $SUPER $DASH {future}(DASHUSDT) {future}(SUPERUSDT) {spot}(RAYUSDT)
#circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet 🚨 Stablecoin Issuers Circle & Tether Freeze Funds Linked to Bitget Exploit

In a swift response to the recent Bitget security breach, major stablecoin issuers have stepped in to blacklist a hacker’s wallet. Here is a clear breakdown of the latest developments and what it means for the broader crypto ecosystem.

📌 The Core News
• Circle and Tether have jointly blacklisted a wallet identified by security firms as "Bitget Exploiter 8" [[4]].
• This coordinated action successfully froze approximately $318,000 in stablecoins, consisting of roughly 218,023 USDT and 99,990 USDC [[13]].
• Notably, this frozen amount represents less than 0.1% of the total reported loss. The attacker had already swapped the majority of the stolen funds (including over 63,000 ETH) into decentralized, non-freezable assets before the blacklist was applied [[14]].

📊 Market & Ecosystem Impact
• Stablecoin Utility in Action This event highlights the centralized response capability of fiat-backed stablecoin issuers to actively mitigate crypto-related crimes and assist in on-chain investigations.
• Recovery Challenges It underscores a critical security reality: once funds are converted into native, non-freezable blockchain assets (like ETH), recovery becomes significantly more complex for centralized entities.
• Industry Cooperation The rapid coordination between blockchain security firms, exchanges, and stablecoin issuers demonstrates a maturing, collaborative ecosystem response to large-scale exploits.

💬 Join the Discussion
Do you believe stablecoin issuers should have the ability to freeze funds to combat hacks, or does this centralized power conflict with the decentralized ethos of crypto? Share your perspective in the comments below! 👇

🔖 Hashtags
#CryptoSecurity #USDT #USDC #Bitget #Web3

This is for educational purposes only. Not Financial Advice (NFA). Always Do Your Own Research (DYOR).
$RAY $SUPER $DASH
#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet Circle and Tether blacklisted a wallet linked to the Bitget exploit, freezing roughly $318,000 in USDC and USDT. The action came after the Bitget breach in which approximately $351.6 million in assets were affected.  However, most of the stolen funds remained outside the reach of stablecoin issuers, with more than 63,000 ETH reportedly still held across exploiter-linked wallets. #Circle #Tether #USDC #USDT $USDC {spot}(USDCUSDT) $USDT $ETH {spot}(ETHUSDT)
#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet Circle and Tether blacklisted a wallet linked to the Bitget exploit, freezing roughly $318,000 in USDC and USDT. The action came after the Bitget breach in which approximately $351.6 million in assets were affected. 

However, most of the stolen funds remained outside the reach of stablecoin issuers, with more than 63,000 ETH reportedly still held across exploiter-linked wallets.

#Circle #Tether #USDC #USDT $USDC
$USDT $ETH
#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet 🚨 Circle & Tether Freeze $318K Linked to Bitget Breach! 🔒💰 Circle and Tether reportedly froze around $318,000 in stablecoins held in a wallet linked to the Bitget security breach. 🔵 USDC: ~99,990 frozen by Circle 🟢 USDT: ~218,023 restricted by Tether ⟠ ETH: ~170.47 ETH also in the wallet, but cannot be frozen by stablecoin issuers 📊 The frozen amount is tiny compared with the reported ~$387.5M breach. ⚠️ The key distinction: USDC and USDT issuers can blacklist their tokens, while native assets like ETH and XRP generally cannot be frozen at the token-contract level. 🔐 Bitget reportedly attributed the incident to compromised backend wallet infrastructure and manipulated transaction data, while stating its protection fund covers customer losses. #Bitget #USDC #USDT #Ethereum
#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet
🚨 Circle & Tether Freeze $318K Linked to Bitget Breach! 🔒💰

Circle and Tether reportedly froze around $318,000 in stablecoins held in a wallet linked to the Bitget security breach.

🔵 USDC: ~99,990 frozen by Circle
🟢 USDT: ~218,023 restricted by Tether
⟠ ETH: ~170.47 ETH also in the wallet, but cannot be frozen by stablecoin issuers

📊 The frozen amount is tiny compared with the reported ~$387.5M breach.

⚠️ The key distinction: USDC and USDT issuers can blacklist their tokens, while native assets like ETH and XRP generally cannot be frozen at the token-contract level.

🔐 Bitget reportedly attributed the incident to compromised backend wallet infrastructure and manipulated transaction data, while stating its protection fund covers customer losses.

#Bitget #USDC #USDT #Ethereum
*Bitget Hack Update — $XRP {spot}(XRPUSDT) #StrategyStriveAdd2305BitcoinThisWeek #DogecoinETFsPostBiggestWeekSinceLaunch #CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #SECSaysTokenBuybacksNotAutoSecurities The attacker has moved ∼$83M worth of stolen $XRP from 3 holding wallets. Around 103M $XRpwas stolen in total — now ∼$75M still sits in wallets that _cannot be frozen_ under XRP Ledger rules. XRP is the native asset, so Ripple has no freeze button for it. What _can_ be done: - Exchanges can blacklist accounts that RECEIVE the stolen funds - But they can't block the attacker's own wallets For comparison: Circle and Tether already froze ∼$320K in related USDC/USDT — those tokens have blacklist controls. Bitget says its protection fund will fully cover the $387.5M loss, customer balances are safe, and withdrawals will resume gradually Sept. 28 - Oct. 2. Now the real question is: how much of this $XRP can be tracked / frozen when it hits CEXs? The on-chain chase is on. 7fa8
*Bitget Hack Update — $XRP
#StrategyStriveAdd2305BitcoinThisWeek #DogecoinETFsPostBiggestWeekSinceLaunch #CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #SECSaysTokenBuybacksNotAutoSecurities The attacker has moved ∼$83M worth of stolen $XRP from 3 holding wallets.

Around 103M $XRpwas stolen in total — now ∼$75M still sits in wallets that _cannot be frozen_ under XRP Ledger rules. XRP is the native asset, so Ripple has no freeze button for it.

What _can_ be done:
- Exchanges can blacklist accounts that RECEIVE the stolen funds
- But they can't block the attacker's own wallets

For comparison: Circle and Tether already froze ∼$320K in related USDC/USDT — those tokens have blacklist controls.

Bitget says its protection fund will fully cover the $387.5M loss, customer balances are safe, and withdrawals will resume gradually Sept. 28 - Oct. 2.

Now the real question is: how much of this $XRP can be tracked / frozen when it hits CEXs? The on-chain chase is on. 7fa8
·
--
#circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet 🚨 BITGET HACK: $318K FROZEN. BUT 63K+ ETH STILL MOVING The Bitget exploit has shown one of crypto’s security realities. Circle and Tether listed a hacker’s wallet as blacklisted, freezing about $318K in USDC and USDT. But here is the story 👇 🔹 Bitget breach is now estimated at about $387.5M 🔹 More than 63,000 ETH remains in wallets linked to the exploiter 🔹 ETH cannot be frozen by stablecoin issuers 🔹 Bitget says the attack involved a compromise of backend infrastructure not a leak 🔹 Bitget says its protection fund of $464M+ covers user losses 📌 Trader takeaway: Watch the wallets and ETH/XRP movements closely. Large transfers, to exchanges could add selling pressure. The real question: Will the hacker keep holding ETH or will the hacker start distributing ETH through wallets? What are you watching. ETH flows or Bitget recovery updates? 👇 #crypto #Ethereum #Bitget #khan6 $ETH $BTC $SOL {future}(SOLUSDT) {future}(BTCUSDT) {future}(ETHUSDT)
#circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet 🚨 BITGET HACK: $318K FROZEN. BUT 63K+ ETH STILL MOVING

The Bitget exploit has shown one of crypto’s security realities.

Circle and Tether listed a hacker’s wallet as blacklisted, freezing about $318K in USDC and USDT.

But here is the story 👇

🔹 Bitget breach is now estimated at about $387.5M

🔹 More than 63,000 ETH remains in wallets linked to the exploiter

🔹 ETH cannot be frozen by stablecoin issuers

🔹 Bitget says the attack involved a compromise of backend infrastructure not a leak

🔹 Bitget says its protection fund of $464M+ covers user losses

📌 Trader takeaway: Watch the wallets and ETH/XRP movements closely. Large transfers, to exchanges could add selling pressure.

The real question: Will the hacker keep holding ETH or will the hacker start distributing ETH through wallets?

What are you watching. ETH flows or Bitget recovery updates? 👇

#crypto #Ethereum #Bitget #khan6

$ETH $BTC $SOL
📊 Bitget Hack: What Crypto Traders Should Watch Bitget says the breach affected approximately $387.5M in assets, while its protection fund is intended to cover customer losses. Circle and Tether have already frozen a small portion of the stolen stablecoins. Now watch $ETH and $XRP wallet movements closely — on-chain data can reveal the next move before headlines do. 🔎 #circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet
📊 Bitget Hack: What Crypto Traders Should Watch
Bitget says the breach affected approximately $387.5M in assets, while its protection fund is intended to cover customer losses.
Circle and Tether have already frozen a small portion of the stolen stablecoins.
Now watch $ETH and $XRP wallet movements closely — on-chain data can reveal the next move before headlines do. 🔎

#circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet
Статья
📽️🍿 And the Media Circus 🎪 around the Bitget hack continues !What happened & timeline of events 🦹The Hacker has entered Bitget exchange draining it for $385M 💰 in various crypto currencies. ⏳The first "suspicious" transfer was noticed 3 HOURS BEFORE Bitget actualy reacted They have been alerted more times during this 3 hours ,one time by Bubblemaps who saw huge amounts being drained to a new wallet and split into more places right after - which is well known tackics hackers use. 🤯 There was NO 🙂‍↔️ private keys exploit, the whole heist happened because Bitget's system itself ALLOWED it to happened. 👉 3hours later.... They finally reacted and stoped the withdrawals. 🔶Big exchanges reacted to the news and offered help, among them was our very own @CZ showing it's full support and offering help to Bitget in this troubled times . Other exchanges offered help also, showing sympathy and crypto communities standing together in the face of unfortunate events 🌪️ 💱 Tether and Circle have jumped in to help, promising they I'll freeze the hackers known address stablecoins . Now this guest as noble as it looks opened a whole avalanche 🛘 of questions 👉 It Tether and Circle can Freeze someone's address, what's stoping them from freezing our assets if some bank or organisation SKS them ? The very nature of crypto is being put under a big question ❓ Decentralisation or Not quite ? This spiced up even more when Bitget's CEO Gracy Chan reached out to Thor Chain - the chain that stands by decentralisation stronger than many others Also, one of the most attacked and blamed for "not helping " in many cases like this one Thor Chain makes their point - we are truly decentralised, we can't just pause all withdrawals for all users cause it's convenient Also have you asked Bitcoin, Etherium , BNB CHAIN to stop their withdrawals too - cause most of the money is going through those chains? Making a hard point on decentralisation and the nature of crypto , Thor Chain ⛓️ Takes their stand here. Users are devided - half say great for Thor, decentralisation should always be respected , that's why it exists , while the other half say Thor Chain uses double standards - when they were hacked they did stoped withdrawals for 13h so it is possible. Thor Chain ⛓️ sais - ask $BTC , $ETH and other chains to stop withdrawals, why are we always attacked ? What is your take ? Decentralisation on demand or always ? #Hack #CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet

📽️🍿 And the Media Circus 🎪 around the Bitget hack continues !

What happened & timeline of events
🦹The Hacker has entered Bitget exchange draining it for $385M 💰 in various crypto currencies.
⏳The first "suspicious" transfer was noticed 3 HOURS BEFORE Bitget actualy reacted
They have been alerted more times during this 3 hours ,one time by Bubblemaps who saw huge amounts being drained to a new wallet and split into more places right after - which is well known tackics hackers use.
🤯 There was NO 🙂‍↔️ private keys exploit, the whole heist happened because Bitget's system itself ALLOWED it to happened.
👉 3hours later.... They finally reacted and stoped the withdrawals.
🔶Big exchanges reacted to the news and offered help, among them was our very own @CZ showing it's full support and offering help to Bitget in this troubled times . Other exchanges offered help also, showing sympathy and crypto communities standing together in the face of unfortunate events 🌪️
💱 Tether and Circle have jumped in to help, promising they I'll freeze the hackers known address stablecoins . Now this guest as noble as it looks opened a whole avalanche 🛘 of questions
👉 It Tether and Circle can Freeze someone's address, what's stoping them from freezing our assets if some bank or organisation SKS them ? The very nature of crypto is being put under a big question ❓ Decentralisation or Not quite ?
This spiced up even more when Bitget's CEO Gracy Chan reached out to Thor Chain - the chain that stands by decentralisation stronger than many others Also, one of the most attacked and blamed for "not helping " in many cases like this one Thor Chain makes their point - we are truly decentralised, we can't just pause all withdrawals for all users cause it's convenient Also have you asked Bitcoin, Etherium , BNB CHAIN to stop their withdrawals too - cause most of the money is going through those chains?
Making a hard point on decentralisation and the nature of crypto , Thor Chain ⛓️ Takes their stand here. Users are devided - half say great for Thor, decentralisation should always be respected , that's why it exists , while the other half say
Thor Chain uses double standards - when they were hacked they did stoped withdrawals for 13h so it is possible.
Thor Chain ⛓️ sais - ask $BTC , $ETH and other chains to stop withdrawals, why are we always attacked ?
What is your take ?
Decentralisation on demand or always ?
#Hack
#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet
·
--
Рост
#circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet 🔴 BITGET'S $387.5M INCIDENT: NO COLD-WALLET COMPROMISE Crypto exchange Bitget has reported that approximately $387.5 million in assets were affected by unauthorized transfers detected on September 24 at 18:31 UTC. The initial estimate was $351.6 million, but the figure was later revised after additional on-chain tracing identified assets including ZEC and TRX. 🔐 HOW DID IT HAPPEN? According to Bitget, the incident was contained to parts of its hot and warm wallet infrastructure. 🛡️ Cold wallets remained secure. Bitget said the attacker exploited a vulnerability in its backend wallet infrastructure and manipulated transaction data so that unauthorized transfers were processed through the platform's authorization system. The investigation is continuing with Mandiant and SlowMist. 💰 $464M+ PROTECTION FUND Bitget says its User Protection Fund holds more than $464 million and covers the financial impact of the incident. The exchange also says customer account balances remain unaffected, while deposits and trading continue. 🧊 STABLECOINS FROZEN Circle and Tether have reportedly frozen approximately $318,000 in USDC and USDT linked to the attacker addresses. 📅 WITHDRAWALS TO RESUME Bitget has announced a phased withdrawal schedule: • September 28: BTC • September 29: ETH • September 30: USDT • October 2: Other tokens, fiat & P2P ⚠️ NORTH KOREA CONNECTION? Bitget CEO Gracy Chen has said that the attack pattern appears consistent with groups previously associated with North Korea. However, the attacker's identity and attribution remain under investigation, so this should be treated as an allegation rather than a confirmed fact. 📊 MARKET WATCH The incident highlights the continuing importance of exchange security, wallet architecture and asset protection in the crypto industry. ₿ $BTC | ♦️ $ETH | 💧 $XRP #Bitget #BitgetHack #CryptoSecurity #CryptoNews #Bitcoin #Ethereum #XRP #BNB #Crypto #Blockchain #BinanceSquare
#circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet 🔴 BITGET'S $387.5M INCIDENT: NO COLD-WALLET COMPROMISE
Crypto exchange Bitget has reported that approximately $387.5 million in assets were affected by unauthorized transfers detected on September 24 at 18:31 UTC.
The initial estimate was $351.6 million, but the figure was later revised after additional on-chain tracing identified assets including ZEC and TRX.
🔐 HOW DID IT HAPPEN?
According to Bitget, the incident was contained to parts of its hot and warm wallet infrastructure.
🛡️ Cold wallets remained secure.
Bitget said the attacker exploited a vulnerability in its backend wallet infrastructure and manipulated transaction data so that unauthorized transfers were processed through the platform's authorization system. The investigation is continuing with Mandiant and SlowMist.
💰 $464M+ PROTECTION FUND
Bitget says its User Protection Fund holds more than $464 million and covers the financial impact of the incident.
The exchange also says customer account balances remain unaffected, while deposits and trading continue.
🧊 STABLECOINS FROZEN
Circle and Tether have reportedly frozen approximately $318,000 in USDC and USDT linked to the attacker addresses.
📅 WITHDRAWALS TO RESUME
Bitget has announced a phased withdrawal schedule:
• September 28: BTC
• September 29: ETH
• September 30: USDT
• October 2: Other tokens, fiat & P2P
⚠️ NORTH KOREA CONNECTION?
Bitget CEO Gracy Chen has said that the attack pattern appears consistent with groups previously associated with North Korea. However, the attacker's identity and attribution remain under investigation, so this should be treated as an allegation rather than a confirmed fact.
📊 MARKET WATCH
The incident highlights the continuing importance of exchange security, wallet architecture and asset protection in the crypto industry.
₿ $BTC | ♦️ $ETH | 💧 $XRP
#Bitget #BitgetHack #CryptoSecurity #CryptoNews #Bitcoin #Ethereum #XRP #BNB #Crypto #Blockchain #BinanceSquare
🚨 Circle & Tether Freeze Funds Linked to Bitget Hack Circle and Tether blacklisted a wallet tied to the Bitget exploit, freezing about $318K in USDC + USDT. But more than 63,000 $ETH linked to the exploit remained outside stablecoin issuer controls. For spot traders, $BTC, $ETH and $XRP are worth watching as the fund movements continue. 👀📊 #circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet
🚨 Circle & Tether Freeze Funds Linked to Bitget Hack
Circle and Tether blacklisted a wallet tied to the Bitget exploit, freezing about $318K in USDC + USDT.
But more than 63,000 $ETH linked to the exploit remained outside stablecoin issuer controls.
For spot traders, $BTC, $ETH and $XRP are worth watching as the fund movements continue. 👀📊

#circletetherfreezebitgethackerwallet
Статья
Circle & Tether Freeze Wallet Linked to Bitget ExploitThe recent Bitget security incident has sparked another major discussion about crypto security and stablecoin control. Circle and Tether reportedly blacklisted a wallet connected to the exploit, freezing approximately $318,000 worth of USDC and USDT. However, this represents only a small portion of the affected assets. A significant amount was reportedly converted into ETH, which cannot be directly frozen by USDC or USDT issuers. This creates an interesting contrast. Stablecoins: issuers can intervene and freeze specific tokens. Native crypto assets: assets such as ETH operate without a centralized issuer capable of freezing the coins themselves. The incident therefore raises a broader question for the crypto industry: Does the ability to freeze stolen stablecoins provide an important security layer, or does it introduce a trade-off with the permissionless nature of cryptocurrency? The investigation and movement of the affected funds remain an evolving story. What is your view? $USDC $USDT #CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #Bitget

Circle & Tether Freeze Wallet Linked to Bitget Exploit

The recent Bitget security incident has sparked another major discussion about crypto security and stablecoin control.
Circle and Tether reportedly blacklisted a wallet connected to the exploit, freezing approximately $318,000 worth of USDC and USDT.
However, this represents only a small portion of the affected assets. A significant amount was reportedly converted into ETH, which cannot be directly frozen by USDC or USDT issuers.
This creates an interesting contrast.
Stablecoins: issuers can intervene and freeze specific tokens.
Native crypto assets: assets such as ETH operate without a centralized issuer capable of freezing the coins themselves.
The incident therefore raises a broader question for the crypto industry:
Does the ability to freeze stolen stablecoins provide an important security layer, or does it introduce a trade-off with the permissionless nature of cryptocurrency?
The investigation and movement of the affected funds remain an evolving story.
What is your view?
$USDC $USDT
#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #Bitget
🚨 Circle & Tether Freeze Bitget-Linked Wallet Circle and Tether have blacklisted a wallet linked to the recent Bitget exploit, freezing roughly $318,000 in USDC and USDT. But here’s the interesting part: the majority of the stolen assets were reportedly moved into ETH, which cannot simply be frozen by a stablecoin issuer. This incident highlights an important crypto-security question: 🔐 How should the industry balance asset recovery, security, and decentralization? What do you think? $USDC {spot}(USDCUSDT) $USDT #CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #BinanceSquareTalks
🚨 Circle & Tether Freeze Bitget-Linked Wallet

Circle and Tether have blacklisted a wallet linked to the recent Bitget exploit, freezing roughly $318,000 in USDC and USDT.

But here’s the interesting part: the majority of the stolen assets were reportedly moved into ETH, which cannot simply be frozen by a stablecoin issuer.

This incident highlights an important crypto-security question:

🔐 How should the industry balance asset recovery, security, and decentralization?

What do you think?

$USDC
$USDT

#CircleTetherFreezeBitgetHackerWallet #BinanceSquareTalks
Войдите, чтобы посмотреть больше материала
Присоединяйтесь к пользователям криптовалют по всему миру на Binance Square
⚡️ Получайте новейшую и полезную информацию о криптоактивах.
💬 Нам доверяет крупнейшая в мире криптобиржа.
👍 Получите достоверные аналитические данные от верифицированных создателей контента.
Эл. почта/номер телефона