Mahnoor_Trades10

Below you’ll find a consolidated, up-to-date dossier on Kite what it is, who’s behind it, how it works, where the token stands today, and which technical and ecosystem pieces are live or promised. I pulled this from Kite’s own docs and whitepaper, major exchange/project pages, press releases and recent coverage so you get both the project’s description and independent confirmations of funding, listings and token data. I’ve marked sources inline so you can jump straight to the original pages for any detail.

Overview and mission

Kite bills itself as the first purpose-built payment blockchain for the “agentic web”: a Layer-1, EVM-compatible network engineered so autonomous AI agents can authenticate, coordinate and move value with predictable, programmatic controls. The public pitch is straightforward provide identity primitives, near-real-time settlement, cheap micropayments (stablecoin rails), and governance primitives so agents become reliable economic actors rather than ad-hoc scripts. Kite’s website and docs present the project as a full stack composed of the Chain (Layer-1), Build (developer tooling and modules) and the Agentic Network (agent identity, sessioning and discovery).

What the whitepaper says about architecture and performance

Kite’s whitepaper lays out the technical philosophy and concrete mechanisms the team intends to use. Two things are emphasized repeatedly: first, the three-layer identity model separating users (human principals), agents (autonomous services/entities) and sessions (short-lived keys/contexts) which allows fine-grained, time-bounded delegation without exposing long-term keys; second, an emphasis on off-chain update channels (state-channel style flows) where an “open” and “close” are anchored on-chain while thousands of signed, off-chain interactions occur between those anchors. The paper claims this design can yield sub-hundred-millisecond latencies for streaming micropayments and amortized fees in the order of “$1 per million requests” by treating micro-interactions as first-class behaviors. Those exact performance claims and the state-channel architecture are described directly in the whitepaper and technical docs.

Token (KITE) utility, tokenomics and roadmap for utility phases

KITE is Kite’s native token. According to the project docs and tokenomics pages, the token’s utility is planned to roll out in two phases. Phase one focuses on ecosystem participation and incentives: testnet rewards, airdrops for contributors and builders, usage incentives for early modules, and liquidity-side incentives that bootstrap the agentic economy. Phase two adds classic Layer-1 utilities: staking for network security, governance voting, fee-related functions and module economics (delegation, validator rewards, fee sharing). The docs spell out staking and governance primitives and describe how module owners, validators and delegators interact economically. The project has published a tokenomics page with supply numbers, allocation categories and high-level vesting schedules; check the docs for the latest token distribution PDF and precise vesting tables.

Funding, investors and strategic backers (what’s been announced)

Kite has publicly announced institutional backing that adds credibility to its ambition. In 2025 the project completed equity raises that brought cumulative funding to roughly $33 million. Public announcements and multiple press outlets show a Series A led by PayPal Ventures and General Catalyst (reported as an $18M Series A round that brought total financing to $33M), with further strategic participation and follow-on investments (including a disclosed investment from Coinbase Ventures). These rounds and the investor list (PayPal Ventures, General Catalyst, Coinbase Ventures and other VCs / ecosystem funds referenced in press materials) are confirmed by Kite’s team posts and press releases. That investor mix explains the heavy emphasis in public messaging on payments, stablecoins and compliance-sensitive tooling.

Market status, listings and price snapshot (live market data)

KITE is listed on major market aggregators and several centralized exchanges. Real-time aggregate price pages (CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko) and individual exchange pages (Binance, Coinbase listings/price pages) show consistent live pricing data and circulating supply numbers; at the time I gathered these sources the circulating supply was reported around 1.8 billion KITE with a max supply figure shown at 10 billion on multiple listings, and market caps in the low-hundreds of millions USD range depending on price fluctuations and which page you consult. For trading, Cake-style liquidity pairs and centralized exchange orderbooks are available on multiple venues (Binance, Gate, MEXC and others have KITE markets or price pages). These pages are the authoritative, live sources for price and marketcap. If you need a single “right now” price, check one of those exchange pages the price and volume numbers shown on CoinMarketCap/CoinGecko are aggregated and updated constantly.

Network status: testnet, mainnet, airdrops and developer access

Kite’s docs and community posts indicate an incentivized testnet program and airdrop mechanics intended to reward real contributions (bridging, swaps, building agents, quests). The documentation site hosts whitepapers, developer quickstarts and “get started” guides; there are public testnet instructions for developers to run nodes, deploy agent modules, and interact with the Agent Passport tooling described in the whitepaper. Kite has published downloads for the whitepaper and technical references and runs community channels (X/Twitter, Discord) where testnet programs and airdrop eligibility tools have been announced. If you’re a developer or tester, the docs site is the entry point to claim testnet tasks and follow the airdrop rules.

Core technical claims and what they mean in practice

Kite’s combination of three things is the argument the team uses to justify the project’s uniqueness: (1) a layered identity system so delegation/security are human-friendly yet cryptographically enforceable; (2) cheap, stablecoin-native micropayment rails with off-chain update channels for low latency; and (3) EVM compatibility so existing Solidity tooling, wallets and developer know-how can be reused. In practice that means Kite positions itself to enable small, frequent payments (metered API calls, streaming payments for model inference, micro-rewards for data or content) that were previously uneconomical because of fee and latency overhead. The whitepaper describes state channels and session keys as the core mechanisms to make those use cases viable.

Security, governance and decentralization posture

Kite documents staking and validator/delegator roles in the network’s security model and says token holders will gain governance voice as the token’s second phase activates. The docs and project pages describe validators as Proof-of-Stake participants securing the Layer-1 and outline delegated staking flows for token holders. The team intentionally phases governance functionality to avoid introducing complex community control before the economic and technical foundations are in place. For details about on-chain governance primitives, referendum mechanics and staking reward formulas, see the tokenomics and governance sections of the official docs and the tokenomics PDF.

Ecosystem, partners and integrations

Public statements and news articles list a set of strategic backers and ecosystem partners that extend the project’s reach: investor partners (PayPal Ventures, General Catalyst, Coinbase Ventures, Samsung Next, Avalanche Foundation among others cited in reporting and PR notices) and some ecosystem integrations referenced by the team and press (wallet integrations, exchange listings). The investor list and partnership announcements bolster Kite’s claim that it is approaching payments and compliance from both the startup and incumbent finance angles. For a full, current list of partners and their roles, Kite’s newsroom and the press releases are the best source.

What’s public vs. what’s still being built or open questions

Kite has released a whitepaper, technical docs, testnet programs, and commercialization-facing messaging (funding announcements, exchange listings). But several implementation questions remain dependent on future releases and mainnet maturity. Examples you should watch for and validate directly on the project docs or release notes: the finalized consensus details (the docs reference PoS but do not lock the conversation into a single third-party consensus implementation in the places I checked), the mainnet launch date and validator set composition, exact on-chain fee economics once stablecoin rails and fee modules are activated, and detailed security-audit reports for the chain code and agent identity modules. These elements are typical blockers toward fully decentralized or production-grade deployments; Kite’s public roadmap indicates they’re working through those steps but you should verify the latest release notes and audit disclosures before assuming full mainnet production readiness.

Practical implications and near-term user experience

From a user’s point of view the most tangible pieces will be: wallet and UX abstractions that hide key material (session keys and agent delegation flows), stablecoin access for settlement, wallet/exchange integrations so KITE and the stable rails can be bought and used, and simple governance interfaces when token voting goes live. Kite’s docs emphasize human-friendly delegation UIs and session lifetimes so non-technical users can delegate tasks safely to agents. If you want to build or test today, follow the docs’ Quickstart to join the testnet and participate in incentive programs and quests that the team has announced.

Where to read the primary sources (quick links)

For the single-source, canonical materials start here: Kite’s website and docs (whitepaper, technical docs and tokenomics pages) are the authoritative sources for architecture and token plans. For market and listing info use CoinMarketCap/CoinGecko and the exchange pages (Binance/Coinbase/Gate/MEXC) for live prices and markets. For funding and PR, see the PayPal press release and follow the project’s official X/Twitter feed for real-time community notices. I’ve cited those core pages throughout this summary and linked them inline.

Concise action plan if you want deeper, hands-on info now

If you want me to do any of the following in this session, say which one and I’ll fetch the exact pages and extract the specifics immediately (price/marketcap snapshot from a given exchange, tokenomics PDF and vesting table parsing, whitepaper technical excerpts on identity/session keys, testnet participation guide and airdrop eligibility rules, or a list of exchanges and contract addresses):

• Live market snapshot and circulating supply with a timestamp and sources.

• Copy and summarize the tokenomics PDF (supply, allocations, vesting schedule).

• Extract specific whitepaper sections on the identity model and reproduce the relevant diagrams or textual excerpts (kept within non-copyright limits).

• Walkthrough of how to join the testnet and claim airdrop eligibility, including any on-chain actions the docs require.

If you’d like one of those, tell me which and I’ll pull and summarize the exact pages and figures for you right away. (If you prefer, I can also produce an executive one-page brief suitable for shar

@KITE AI
#KITE
$KITE

Total Value Locked (TVL): trackers show Falcon Finance’s TVL in the high hundreds of millions to low billions range (examples: DeFiLlama reports about $2.08B TVL; Binance’s project writeup cites ~$1.97B).
USDf supply & issuance: project dashboards and market aggregators report USDf as a circulating synthetic dollar (minted on-chain via collateral). Market trackers list USDf as launched Feb 2025 with supply and market stats tracked on token pages.
Native token (FF): Falcon Finance’s governance/utility token $FF has a max supply of 10,000,000,000 with circulating supply figures reported on token aggregators (CoinMarketCap / CoinGecko show circulating supply in the low billions and live market cap / price updates).Audits / reserve assurance: Falcon Finance publishes audit summaries and has released independent quarterly audit/assurance reports (Harris & Trotter LLP) confirming USDf reserves exceed liabilities; the protocol also lists third-party smart contract audits (Zellic, Pashov) on its docs.

What Falcon Finance is (concise)

Falcon Finance bills itself as a universal collateralization infrastructure: a protocol that accepts a broad set of liquid assets (crypto and tokenized real-world assets) as collateral to mint an overcollateralized synthetic dollar USDf. The protocol’s goal is providing immediate on-chain liquidity without forcing asset sales, while offering yield via staking/strategies tied to USDf/sUSDf.

Product primitives & flows (how the system works)

Deposit collateral → Mint USDf Users deposit accepted collateral into Falcon smart contracts and mint USDf against that collateral. The protocol enforces overcollateralization (public docs report minimum collateralization levels e.g., sources reference ~116% minimum in some product descriptions). USDf is therefore backed by user collateral + reserve/strategy buffers.
Stake USDf → sUSDf Staking USDf yields sUSDf (a yield-bearing representation reflecting cumulative yield performance); the protocol advertises staking rewards and APYs in its UI and marketing materials.
Use USDf USDf can be swapped, used for trading, payments, yield strategies, or bridged across supported chains via integrated on-chain flows and partner integrations. Analytics pages (e.g., RWA dashboards, Dune) track transfers and usage

Supported collateral & asset classes

Crypto assets: major liquid tokens (stablecoins like USDC/USDT, ETH, BTC wrappers, SOL and other liquid tokens) are accepted; risk parameters vary by asset class.
Tokenized Real-World Assets (RWAs): the project advertises support for tokenized treasuries, corporate debt and other RWAs enabling holders of tokenized real assets to mint USDf. Sources mention inclusion of tokenized U.S. Treasuries and other institutional assets in their collateral set (project listings and CMC overview).

Chains, integrations & where the protocol runs

The Falcon site and analytics trackers show multi-chain presence and cross-chain integrations (DeFiLlama lists TVL by chain; project docs and app UI show minting tools and swaps). Exact chain list and bridges are visible on the protocol’s app and Dune dashboards.

Tokenomics (FF) summary

Token name / ticker: Falcon Finance / FF.
Max supply: announced 10 billion FF.
Utility: governance, staking, community rewards, potential staking benefits & access to protocol incentives (official tokenomics announcement).

TVL & USDf adoption timeline / milestones

Closed Beta TVL: Falcon announced $100M TVL during its Closed Beta (March 26, 2025), a publicly shared milestone during controlled rollout.
Growth to scale: multiple recent articles and trackers show a substantial increase afterward; DeFiLlama and exchanges cite TVL figures approaching ~$2B in the latest snapshots. This indicates rapid asset inflows and USDf issuance growth.

Security, audits & reserve transparency

Smart contract audits: Falcon’s docs list audits by Zellic and Pashov (smart contract security reviews).
Quarterly audit / assurance on USDf reserves: Falcon published an independent quarterly assurance report by Harris & Trotter LLP (Oct 1, 2025 press release) stating USDf reserves exceed liabilities and that assets backing USDf are held in segregated accounts presented to boost transparency and confidence. Multiple press outlets summarized those results.

Markets, listings & price (FF and USDf)

FF token market pages: live price data, circulating supply and market cap are tracked on CoinMarketCap & CoinGecko (example: CMC and CoinGecko show live price, 24h volume, circulating supply and ranking).
USDf listings / markets: USDf is tracked on RWA/Stablecoin dashboards (app.rwa.xyz), and can be minted/swapped on the Falcon app. Exchanges and DEXs list trading pairs that include USDf check the app for the latest pairs and bridges.

Governance & team signals

Falcon’s public materials (blog, tokenomics announcement) describe a governance model where $FF holders have governance rights; the team has published roadmap posts and tokenomics docs. Leadership names appear across press releases and interviews (e.g., Andrei Grachev quoted in early PR). Company pages and LinkedIn profiles list team and advisor signals. For on-chain governance specifics (voting contracts, timelocks), check the governance docs and GitHub.

Recent press & community signals

PRs and coverage in crypto press and mainstream outlets document the audit release, TVL milestones, and tokenomics rollout. Binance Research/Academy published an explainer piece on Falcon Finance; PR Newswire and crypto outlets reported the audit/assurance. Community dashboards (Dune) show activity and transfer stats.

Where to see / do the main user actions right next

Official app (mint / swap / stake): app.falcon.finance (mint page shown). Use the web app to deposit collateral, mint USDf and stake for sUSDf.
Documentation & audits: docs.falcon.finance (Audits & resources page) links to audit reports and security summaries.
Analytics / market trackers: DeFiLlama (protocol TVL), CoinMarketCap & CoinGecko (FF price & supply), RWA dashboards (USDf metrics).

Key strengths (based on current data & design)

Broad collateral set (crypto + RWAs) expands who can access on-chain liquidity without selling assets.
Focus on transparency: regular audit/assurance reporting and public audit docs increase institutional confidence.
Rapid adoption / liquidity: TVL growth from closed beta to multi-hundreds-of-millions / billions shows demand for synthetic dollar and collateralized liquidity.

Key risks & what to watch

Protocol/Smart contract risk despite audits, smart contract risk is inherent; new features or integrations add exposure. (See audit reports for scope & limitations.)
Reserve composition & concentration while audits assert reserves exceed liabilities, the composition (types of assets held, concentration, custodial arrangements) matters; read the audit details to understand liquidity and valuation assumptions.
Regulatory scrutiny stablecoins and synthetic dollar products face increasing regulatory attention globally; legal/regulatory changes could affect issuance, custody or markets. (General industry risk; relates to all synthetic stable providers.)Market & liquidation risk overcollateralized systems depend on liquid markets to rebalance. Rapid price moves or illiquidity in certain collateral types could stress the system; monitor protocol collateralization ratios and liquidation mechanisms in the docs.

Suggested verification links (primary sources)

Falcon Finance official site & app https://falcon.finance / app.falcon.finance (use the mint page for live UI & flows).
TVL & protocol analytics DeFiLlama: Falcon Finance protocol page.
Audit & security resources Falcon docs (Audits page).
Audit / reserve assurance press release PR Newswire / press coverage on Oct 1, 2025 (Harris & Trotter report summary).
Token & market pages CoinMarketCap / CoinGecko FF pages for live price & supply.

@Falconfaker
#FalconFinance
$FF

Below I collected and organized the latest, verifiable information about Yield Guild Games (YGG). I pulled live market data, token metrics, protocol updates, partnerships, security/audit notes, product lines (vaults, SubDAOs, YGG Play), team and governance facts, and where to verify everything yourself. I show sources beside each major claim so you can follow the most load-bearing facts (price/supply/market cap, treasury/token moves, partnerships, vault/SubDAO design, audits/team) are all cited.

Price, market cap and supply (live snapshot)
As of the data sources captured on December 5, 2025, YGG trades around $0.07–$0.08 per token with a market capitalization roughly in the $48–52 million range. Circulating supply is ~680.3 million YGG and the total (max) supply is 1,000,000,000 YGG. Different exchanges/price aggregators display minor minute-by-minute variance, but they agree on the same scale and supply figures.

Tokenomics & distribution highlights
YGG is an ERC-20 token with a 1 billion token max supply. Historical documentation and subsequent tokenomics summaries indicate that a portion was distributed via an early public sale/IDO, with the remainder allocated across community incentives, treasury, team/advisors, and ecosystem programs. Recent on-chain and project disclosures (late 2024–2025) indicate that roughly ~68% of the supply is unlocked/circulating as of late 2025; YGG has executed treasury reallocations and ecosystem deployments in 2025 to support liquidity and yield strategies. For token holders, vesting schedules and treasury deployments remain the key factors to monitor.

Where YGG trades (liquidity / markets)
YGG is listed on major centralized exchanges and visible on large aggregators (CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, Coinbase, Binance, KuCoin, Kraken and others). Trading volume and price differ across venues; use your exchange of choice and liquidity pools for execution. Market pages and aggregator feeds are the fastest way to confirm live price and volume.

Treasury, recent moves and dev updates (notable 2025 events)
In 2025 YGG publicly disclosed several treasury and ecosystem actions. Notable items include a deployment of an “Ecosystem Pool” (50 million $YGG moved on October 28, 2025) to boost liquidity/yield strategies, and a broader “treasury management shift” earlier in the year as the DAO moved toward active on-chain yield generation. The project also posted regular dev updates and product stability/UI work in November/December 2025. These are operational signals that the DAO is actively managing capital for product and liquidity support.

Products & operations: Vaults, SubDAOs, YGG Play and LoL Land
Yield Guild Games operates as a DAO that invests in gaming NFTs and runs community resources through Vaults and SubDAOs. Vaults act as community-managed pools of assets (tokens, NFTs, rewards) used to underwrite scholar programs, yield strategies, and player onboarding. SubDAOs are autonomous groups that focus on individual games, regions, or specific economic strategies; they can manage their own treasury and programs. In 2024–2025 YGG expanded into publishing/investment through YGG Play (a publishing arm/launchpad designed to co-invest in studios and onboard new Web3 games). YGG also has active projects such as LoL Land (a YGG-linked game/experience) for which a smart-contract audit was published in mid-2025.

Partnerships & commercial activity (recent)
YGG has been active signing studio/platform partnerships in 2025. Public announcements include a partnership with The9 (the9bit platform) to accelerate Web3 gaming adoption (announced August 2025) and strategic alliances more recently announced with Warp Chain / WarpGameCHAIN to scale player expansion and onboarding. These collaborations typically involve user acquisition, co-investment, and guild-driven marketing/operations. Track YGG’s official channels for the full legal/term details of each collaboration.

Security, audits and code posture
On the security front, YGG and its product stack show multiple third-party engagements. CertiK/CertiK Skynet project pages and other security listings track contract verification, monitoring, and rating history for YGG. Specific product audits were published for YGG projects (for example the LoL Land audit by FailSafe published around mid-2025). As always, check the specific audit reports and on-chain contract addresses before interacting with contractsaudits reduce but do not eliminate risk.

Team, governance, and public presence
Founders and public faces remain visible: Gabby Dizon is the co-founder and a principal leader who regularly speaks about strategy and product direction. YGG maintains an active DAO governance model: YGG token is used for governance proposals, and SubDAOs exercise delegated autonomy in certain areas. The official site, Medium/Blog updates, and the DAO’s social channels (X/Twitter, Medium, GitHub links from the main site) are the canonical places to track governance proposals, on-chain votes, and treasury disclosures.

On-chain transparency & contracts
YGG’s primary contract addresses (token contract / core contracts) are visible on CertiK, Etherscan links surfaced in project pages, and on aggregator pages. For any financial or smart-contract interaction, I strongly recommend verifying the contract address in the project’s official documentation and on a block-explorer to avoid impersonator tokens. CertiK’s Skynet page lists the verified contract snippet used for monitoring.

Adoption signals & user activity
Gaming dapps and guilds were among the early mass-use cases for blockchain-owned assets and scholarship models. YGG’s publicly reported focus is on expanding playable economies, supporting players through scholarships and vault assets, and publishing/launching new game titles with partner studios. Engagement metrics for blockchain gaming ebb and flow with crypto cycles, but the guilds, vaults, and SubDAOs are the operational mechanism that converts capital into on-the-ground users and retention. See the YGG site and recent dev updates for community-level KPIs and program rollouts.

Practical risks and things to watch
Regulatory clarity on DAOs and token utilities remains uneven worldwide. On-chain risks (smart contract bugs, treasury mismanagement), market risks (price volatility, low liquidity), and counterparty risks (malicious projects/partners) are the primary categories to monitor. Practically, watch the DAO’s treasury disclosures, auditor reports, on-chain token unlock schedules, and major partnership/launch milestonesthose are the events most likely to move fundamentals and price. Recent treasury activity (e.g., the October 28, 2025 ecosystem pool move) is exactly the sort of event to monitor.

Where to verify direct links & checkpoints
Official website (project home, product pages, governance links) is the primary source of truth for project docs and announcements. Aggregators (CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, Coinbase) provide live market feeds and supply numbers. Security trackers (CertiK Skynet, Cyberscope) provide contract verification and monitoring. Major exchange listings (Binance, Coinbase, KuCoin, Kraken) confirm market access and sometimes host project writeups and tokenomics pages. I used all of these to compile the snapshot above; specific references are shown inline throughout this update.

Quick summary (one-paragraph)
Yield Guild Games remains an active Web3 gaming DAO with YGG trading around $0.07–$0.08 (market cap ≈ $50M), a circulating supply near 680M of 1B total tokens, active product lines (vaults, SubDAOs, YGG Play), recent partnership and treasury actions in 2025 (notably an ecosystem pool deployment and studio/platform partnerships), and continuing audits and security monitoring for its product stack. The DAO’s ongoing evolution emphasizes community-run assets, publishing support for games, and on-chain treasury management all things to track if you follow YGG closely.

If you want next:
• I can export the key numeric data (price, market cap, circulating supply, FDV, 24h volume, top exchange listings) into a CSV or table for your records (one-page snapshot updated to the minute).

• I can produce a prioritized watchlist of on-chain events and governance proposals to monitor (with on-chain links).

• Or I can dig into one specific area deeper (example: full audit history & links, complete token vesting schedule and unlock calendar, or SubDAO-by-SubDAO asset list and on-chain holdings).

@Yield Guild Games
#YGGPlay
$YGG

Below is a compiled, up-to-date, and detailed snapshot of Injective (the protocol, token INJ, recent upgrades, ecosystem, economics, and where to watch live data). I pulled the latest published facts and metrics so you have a single place to scan what matters most. Where a number or claim can change quickly (price, TVL, upgrades), I put the source next to it.

Quick summary (one-line)

Injective is a finance-focused Layer-1 blockchain that emphasizes high throughput, sub-second finality, low fees, multi-VM support (EVM + CosmWasm), and cross-chain bridges powered by the INJ token for staking, governance, and fee mechanics.

Latest major network updates and roadmap item

Native EVM mainnet launch (November 2025): Injective announced and launched a native EVM mainnet that enables builders to deploy using familiar Ethereum tooling (Hardhat, Foundry) while leveraging Injective’s low latency and finance modules. The upgrade targets sub-second block times and aims to unify assets and liquidity across Injective’s multi-VM architecture. Reported block time figure ~0.64 seconds in coverage of the launch.
CosmWasm / multi-VM support and prior upgrades: Injective has previously integrated CosmWasm smart contract support and interchain accounts (July upgrade), making it a multi-VM chain that supports both CosmWasm and EVM workflows. This multi-VM approach is central to Injective’s strategy of attracting both Cosmos and Ethereum-native apps.
Planned SVM/Solana VM integration (stated roadmap): Following the EVM release, public communications indicate plans to add Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) compatibility to let Solana-native apps access Injective liquidity in the future.

Core technical characteristics

Layer: L1 (native chain) built with Cosmos SDK heritage and multi-VM capabilities.Finality / throughput: Advertised sub-second block times (reporting ~0.64s post-EVM launch) and design tuned for low latency financial operations. Real throughput depends on runtime and configuration but the project emphasizes high performance.
Fees: Focus on "ultra-low transaction fees" to enable high-frequency and microtransaction use cases.Interoperability / bridges: Injective supports bridging assets from Ethereum, Solana, Polygon and Cosmos (IBC) via its official Injective Bridge and integrations (including Wormhole historically), enabling cross-chain asset flows.

Token (INJ) supply, utility, and tokenomics

Total / max supply: 100,000,000 INJ (max supply cap widely reported).
Circulating supply / market cap (live figures change): At time of these sources the market price was roughly ~$5.8–$6.0 per INJ, giving a market cap in the ~$580M–$595M range (exchanges/aggregators report slightly different live numbers). Use CoinMarketCap / CoinGecko / Binance / Coinbase for real-time price.
Primary utilities of INJ: security (staking and validator/delegator incentives), governance (vote on proposals), fee settlement, and participation in protocol auctions / economic mechanisms.
Inflation / staking mechanics: Injective uses a dynamic inflation model that adjusts between roughly 5% and 10% annual inflation depending on the network’s staking ratio target (commonly reported target ~85%). This dynamic model is intended to incentivize staking when participation is low and moderate inflation when staking is high. Validators earn newly minted rewards; there are slashing rules for misbehavior. Exact yields vary with current inflation and validator selection.

Staking, validators, and security

How staking works: INJ holders can delegate to validators to secure the chain and earn rewards; validators operate nodes and are subject to slashing for downtime or malicious actions. Documentation covers staking, delegation, unbonding periods and slashing.
Staking participation: Reported staking ratios and realized APYs vary over time third-party staking pages and validator explorers (Figment, Chorus One, block explorers) provide up-to-date figures for staked percentage and expected reward rates.

Ecosystem, DeFi apps, and TVL

Top dApps & DeFi projects: Injective’s ecosystem includes DEXs and DeFi apps such as DojoSwap, Helix, Hydro, and others. Rankings and per-dapp TVL / activity are tracked on DappRadar and similar analytics sites.
TVL (Total Value Locked): TVL on Injective and its apps has historically been modest compared to the largest Ethereum L1/L2s; some Injective apps (e.g., DojoSwap) have seen multi-million TVL at points in the past, but TVL fluctuates with market conditions and user activity. Aggregators like DappRadar and DefiLlama (where available) provide current TVL snapshots per app. Because TVL methodologies differ, always check the aggregator’s notes when comparing chains.

Bridges, cross-chain flow, and liquidity

Official Injective Bridge: Injective operates an official bridge UI/stack that supports transfers from Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, and Cosmos IBC. That bridge is the recommended on-ramp for moving assets into Injective for many users and dApps.Wormhole & other connectors: Injective has engaged with cross-chain connectivity projects historically (Wormhole integration announcements), increasing its accessibility to assets and liquidity across ecosystems.

Exchanges, listings, liquidity, and price behavior

Where INJ trades: INJ is listed on major centralized exchanges and DEX aggregators CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, etc. Price and 24h volume figures differ slightly by provider. Check exchange order books for large-trade liquidity.
Recent price context (snapshot): Sources show INJ trading in the ~$5.8–$6.0 range around early Dec 2025; the all-time high remains significantly above that. Prices are volatile use live market pages for up-to-the-minute values.

Governance, treasury, and community

Governance: INJ holders govern the protocol via on-chain proposals and votes. Governance covers upgrades, parameter changes, and treasury allocations. Injective publishes proposals and results through its governance UI and forums.
Treasury & funding: The project funds development via token allocations, ecosystem grants, and partner initiatives; exact treasury balances and allocations are periodically disclosed in official blog updates and governance proposals. Check the Injective blog and governance dashboard for current budget/treasury items.

Developer experience & tooling

EVM compatibility: With the native EVM mainnet, developers can deploy EVM smart contracts using standard tools (Hardhat, Foundry), easing migration or multi-chain deployment. This lowers the friction for Ethereum devs to build on Injective.
CosmWasm support: CosmWasm compatibility lets Cosmos/CosmWasm devs deploy smart contracts natively, enabling multi-paradigm development (Wasm + EVM).
Financial primitives: Injective promotes plug-and-play financial modules (orderbooks, derivatives support, settlement primitives) to accelerate finance apps.

Security posture and audits

Injective’s core code and major upgrades are typically accompanied by audits and public announcements. For specific audit reports (which firm, scope, findings), consult the project’s docs and blog posts for the release in question; audits will differ by module and by upgrade. Always review the audit links for a release before trusting large sums.

Practical user flows (how people actually use Injective today)

Bridging assets into Injective via the official bridge (Wormhole or the Injective Bridge UI) to use DEXs and DeFi apps.
Staking INJ via wallets or staking providers to secure the chain and earn rewards; delegation through validators or custodial services.
Using EVM tooling to deploy contracts post-EVM launch, or CosmWasm for Wasm contracts depending on developer preference.

Where to monitor live / authoritative sources

Official Injective website & blog for upgrades, releases and ecosystem announcements.
Injective Bridge (bridge.injective.network) for bridging and asset flows.
Token & market pages CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, Binance, Coinbase for live price/marketcap/volume.Docs & developer guides Injective docs (staking, tokenomics, developer references).
Dapp aggregators / TVL trackers DappRadar, DefiLlama (if they track Injective) for per-dapp usage and TVL snapshots.

Notes, caveats, and short analysis

Metrics are time-sensitive. Prices, TVL, staking ratios, and short-term on-chain metrics can change hourly. The snapshot above references sources current in early December 2025 check the live links for the latest numbers.
TVL comparability. TVL numbers vary by aggregator due to methodology differences; treat TVL as directional rather than exact unless confirmed by verifiable on-chain checks. (Academic work has highlighted TVL verifiability challenges.)
Ecosystem growth is the key signal. The recent EVM mainnet launch plus multi-VM support materially lowers developer friction and is a major catalyst for ecosystem growth watch dApp counts, liquidity, and partner integrations over the coming quarters.

@Injective
#Injective
$INJ

Snapshot (live market & supply figures)
As of the latest market feeds, YGG trades around $0.07–$0.08 per token with a circulating supply near ~680 million YGG and a total / max supply of 1,000,000,000 YGG; market-cap estimates sit roughly in the $48M–$52M range depending on the price feed. Daily volume at major trackers is in the $10–13M range. These live numbers vary minute-to-minuteCoinGecko and CoinMarketCap provide the most-used real-time feeds.

Tokenomics & vesting overview
YGG’s total max supply is 1 billion tokens. Public data and tokenomics aggregators show the circulating supply is roughly 680,318,334 YGG, with the remaining tokens locked or subject to vesting schedules for founders, investors, treasury and community allocations. Allocation breakdowns published across tokenomist/tokeninsight-style trackers indicate major buckets for Community (~45%), Investors (~22%), Founders (~15%), Treasury (~13.33%), Public Sale (~2.5%) and Advisors (~1.75%) though exact percentages and unlocked amounts should be checked against YGG’s canonical tokenomics docs and recent treasury actions because on-chain treasury moves can change effective circulating supply. Multiple unlock/vesting events have been tracked on token-unlock calendars.

On-chain treasury & ecosystem pool activity (recent / notable moves)
In 2025 YGG moved into a more active on-chain treasury posture. Public updates + press show an ecosystem pool deployment and a 50M YGG allocation for liquidity and yield strategies (announced in 2025), and YGG has publicly discussed shifting parts of treasury management to on-chain strategies to capture yield and support ecosystem growth. These moves have materially affected liquidity and token flow dynamics. See YGG’s own updates and CoinMarketCap / Medium summaries for dates and amounts.

Products & ecosystem Vaults, SubDAOs, YGG Play, gaming operations
Yield Guild Games runs several interlocking product pillars:

• Vaults: YGG Vaults are on-chain vault products meant to pool revenue-generating activities (scholarship rental revenue, subscriptions, merchandising, and yield strategies) and allow token holders to share returns. The vault concept is core to YGG’s model of turning operational revenue into token-holder value; the design and public launch notes are in YGG’s Medium and docs.

• SubDAOs (onchain guilds): YGG operates regional and game-specific SubDAOs (e.g., YGG SEA, game subDAOs) that localize operations, scholarship programs, and community governance. SubDAOs enable focused growth, local partnerships, and client/gamer onboarding while allowing YGG’s treasury and brand to scale horizontally. Binance and YGG Medium describe SubDAO rollouts and examples.

• YGG Play & publishing: YGG has been expanding into publishing and game distribution under YGG Play a dedicated platform (recently centralized at yggplay.fun) for publishing, launching casual titles, and running community events and a launchpad. YGG Play released titles (including YGG’s own LOL Land) and signed third-party publishing deals (example: Gigaverse). This marks movement from purely a guild model to an integrated gaming ecosystem.

• Scholarships / rental economy: YGG’s scholarship model (lending NFT assets to players who share earnings with the guild) remains a core user-facing product and distribution method for onboarding players in emerging markets. YGG reports large scholarship counts historically and highlights this as a core channel for in-game economic activity.

Traction & usage signals
Recent coverage and YGG’s own updates indicate user-growth signals tied to YGG Play and in-house titles: spikes in active users for certain games and higher engagement on YGG Play (reports of 40% monthly user increases published in industry write-ups and platform posts). YGG’s July–November 2025 dev and treasury updates talk about new ecosystem pool deployments and product launches that drove liquidity and engagement. These operational metrics (monthly active users, onchain revenue, scholarship counts) are published episodically in YGG’s update channels.

Market listings & exchange support
YGG is tracked on all major aggregators (CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap) and listed on major exchanges and aggregator pages (Coinbase/Coinbase Asset page, Binance content features). Price and liquidity are visible through CEX/DEX markets listed on those platforms.

Governance structure & DAO operations
YGG is a DAO with governance mechanisms tied to token holdings; historically YGG used on-chain voting mechanisms and community proposals, and it has been iterating governance to support SubDAOs and localized decision-making. Governance changes and treasury proposals are published through official channels and onchain snapshots when proposals go live. For detailed governance history, check YGG’s governance posts and snapshot pages.

Security, audits, and risks
Security posture and audit coverage are mixed in third-party trackers: some security scores/coverage metrics are limited and token-insight trackers note audit or insurance gaps. Key risks to monitor include token unlock/vesting events (which can increase circulating supply), treasury management choices, the concentration of assets in scholarships or key SubDAOs, and broader market risk for gaming tokens. YGG’s whitepaper and governance posts discuss safeguards, but on-chain transparency and external audits are essential due diligence for institutional partners.

Recent timeline (high-level, 2024–2025 highlights)
• Mid–2024 onward: YGG continued to expand SubDAO model and scholarship capacity.

• 2025: YGG launched YGG Play (publishing arm), released LOL Land as an in-house title, and began deploying larger on-chain treasury/yield strategies (notable 50M YGG ecosystem pool announcements). The organization announced moves to publish updates on yggplay.fun and increased onchain guild activity. These events mark a strategic shift from pure guild operations toward a broader gaming/publishing ecosystem.

Partnerships & ecosystem deals
YGG has a history of publishing partnerships (Gigaverse, third-party studios) and event/tournament collaborations (e.g., Pixelmon TCG tournament, other community events). These partnerships help grow player counts and distribution of game assets under YGG’s management. YGG’s public channels (Medium, Binance posts, PlayToEarn coverage) list several recent deals and publishing announcements.

Where the money comes from (revenue channels)
YGG’s earnings historically have come from rental/subscription revenue (scholarship splits), token and NFT appreciation, treasury yield strategies, publishing fees, and merchant/event revenues. Vaults are designed to aggregate these revenues and distribute or reinvest according to vault rules. The shift to actively managing an ecosystem pool reflects an emphasis on yield generation and liquidity support.

Key metrics you may want tracked continuously
Live price, circulating supply, trading volume, FDV, exchange orderbook liquidity, on-chain treasury balances (addresses used by YGG treasury), scholarship counts and SubDAO membership, YGG Play MAU and game-specific active users, token unlock calendar / vesting schedule. Major trackers to watch: CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, TokenTerminal (market metrics), Tokenomist / TokenInsight (vesting & tokenomics), YGG official blog/Medium and yggplay.fun for product updates.

Short risks & open questions
Regulatory scrutiny of token economics, the pace and transparency of token unlocks from vested allocations, treasury management decisions (on-chain risk and counterparty risk), reliance on gaming market cycles, and security/audit completeness for vault contracts and publishing contracts. These factors will shape long-term sustainability of YGG’s model.

Sources I used (representative)
Yield Guild Games official site & Medium (product and governance updates).

CoinGecko (live price, circulating supply, tokenomics summary).

CoinMarketCap (live price, market cap, news rollups).

Binance articles / Square posts (features on Vaults, SubDAOs, YGG Play coverage).

Tokenomist / TokenInsight (tokenomics breakdown & vesting schedules).

PlayToEarn / industry press (partnerships, game launches).

@Yield Guild Games
#YGGPlay
$YGG

Plasma is a Layer-1, EVM-compatible blockchain purpose-built for high-volume, low-cost global stablecoin payments. Its product positioning is “payment rails for stablecoins”: near-instant settlement, extremely low (often zero) transfer costs for certain stablecoins, and developer compatibility with Ethereum tooling so apps can adopt it without relearning many primitives.

Technical design and performance
Plasma is designed to prioritize payments throughput and UX over being a general-purpose playground. The chain is EVM-compatible (developers can use Hardhat/Foundry/MetaMask and other familiar tools) while using a payments-tuned consensus and architecture that aims for thousands of transactions per second and sub-second finality. The docs and product marketing emphasize stablecoin-native features such as fee-abstraction (users can pay gas in stablecoins for many flows) and zero-fee transfers for specific stablecoins in normal transfers.

Mainnet status, liquidity and TVL
Plasma launched its mainnet beta in late September 2025 and reported extremely rapid liquidity adoption at launch: media and partner statements cite $2B+ in stablecoin liquidity on mainnet beta and very large bridged TVL figures reported by chain trackers. DefiLlama and other aggregators show multi-billion dollar TVL metrics for the chain (including bridged and native TVL), reflecting significant stablecoin deposits early in the chain’s lifecycle.

Native token (XPL) and tokenomics
Plasma’s native utility/governance token is XPL. According to Plasma’s tokenomics page and widely-used market trackers, the initial supply at mainnet beta was set at 10,000,000,000 XPL, with an initial circulating supply in the ballpark of ~1.8–2.0 billion XPL around launch, and token distribution/vesting schedules published in the tokenomics docs. Market sites (CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, etc.) list live price, circulating supply, and market cap metrics for XPL.

Key partnerships, integrations and ecosystem products
Plasma has rapidly announced or been reported to have multiple ecosystem integrations and partnerships that target payments and compliance:

• Compliance & analytics: Elliptic announced a partnership to provide on-chain compliance tooling for Plasma, helping make the chain palatable to regulated businesses and custodians.

• Wallets & custodians: Major wallets (e.g., Trust Wallet) announced Plasma integrations to enable users to send/receive stablecoins on Plasma with near-zero fees and instant settlement. Exchange and wallet listings are appearing on major platforms and trackers.

• Exchanges & custody: Listings and token support for XPL have shown up on major market sites (CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko) and exchanges; some centralized exchange products (earnings/earn products) were used as liquidity drivers at launch.

• Product verticals: Plasma has consumer-facing products such as Plasma One, a neobank-style product with a Visa card issued via a partner (Signify/issuer) that lets users spend stablecoins offchain/onchain via familiar rails. The chain also targets remittance apps, merchant rails, payroll, and machine-to-machine micropayments.

Funding & backers
Plasma raised institutional capital before or during mainnet development. Reporting cites a Series A of about $20M led by investors such as Framework Ventures and involvement/interest from industry actors including Bitfinex/Tether personnel and other institutional backers. Those funding and backing signals were widely covered in industry outlets.

Real-world traction and UX innovations
Plasma’s main UX/market innovations focus on making blockchain payments invisible and frictionless: enabling gas payments in stablecoins, zero-fee transfers for common stablecoins (USDT in particular is repeatedly called out), and integrations that remove the need for users to manage native gas tokens. That design directly targets remittances, merchant settlement, creator micropayments, and consumer wallet flows — i.e., places where low cost and instant settlement matter. Early adoption patterns and campaigns (including pre-deposit/bridge mechanisms tied to token sales and exchange products) produced large liquidity inflows quickly.

Ecosystem metrics (what trackers show)
Chain aggregators and market trackers list Plasma metrics such as stablecoin market cap on chain, TVL (bridged + native), chain fees and revenues, DEX volumes, and XPL price/market cap. Examples: DefiLlama’s Plasma page with TVL breakdown and CoinMarketCap/CoinGecko XPL price pages. These trackers are useful for monitoring daily changes in TVL, on-chain stablecoin dominance, and revenue. (If you want, I can snapshot the exact numbers from DefiLlama/CoinGecko/CoinMarketCap right now and paste them in one place.)

Security, decentralization, and governance
Plasma markets itself as “institutional-grade security” while also signalling a roadmap to decentralize validator control over time. The chain documentation and interviews with leadership describe a validator/consensus model (sometimes described in docs as PlasmaBFT or similar) tuned for finality and throughput; at launch the governance/validator set has a degree of centralization typical of new chains that plan staged decentralization. The team has emphasised rapid decentralization as a stated goal.

Regulatory posture and compliance
Because Plasma targets payments and stablecoins (areas of high regulatory attention), the team has built compliance into the pitch: partnering with analytics/compliance firms (Elliptic) and structuring integrations to make custody/on-off-ramp providers, card networks, and enterprises comfortable with pilot use. That positioning reduces a key adoption barrier, though regulatory outcomes will continue to be an external risk factor.

Recent notable press and commentary
Industry outlets and major exchanges have run feature pieces and interviews about Plasma in October–November 2025: Binance research/features, The Block and The Defiant coverage of the $2B launch liquidity and XPL token, and multiple wallet/exchange posts about integrations and support. These signal broad industry interest and fast ecosystem momentum in the weeks after mainnet beta.

Current risks and open questions
Plasma’s proposition is powerful but depends on a few fragile elements:

• Stablecoin concentration and custodial risk: large flows of stablecoins onto a single chain create concentration and custodial/bridge risk; users and institutions will watch how custody and bridging are controlled and insured.

• Regulatory actions: stablecoins and payment rails are topic of active regulation globally; outcomes (U.S., EU, other major markets) will affect institutional access and partnerships.

• Centralization during early stages: early validator/operator concentration is common for new L1s. The roadmap to decentralize and the pace of that change matter for long-term trust.

• Competition: incumbent payment-oriented chains (Tron historically for USDT flows, and Ethereum L2s) and other payment L1s will react; network effects around liquidity and wallet integrations determine long-term winners.

Where to look next (live sources)
If you want a single snapshot that you can keep refreshing, these pages are the best live sources:
• Plasma official site & docs (specs, tokenomics, developer guides).

• DefiLlama Plasma page (TVL, stablecoin Mcap, fees).

• CoinMarketCap / CoinGecko (XPL price, circulating supply).

• Elliptic / press articles and TheBlock / Axios coverage for compliance and funding context.

Short conclusion
Plasma has executed a classic “vertical focus” go-to-market: build a chain for one high-value, high-frequency use case (stablecoin payments), remove UX pain points (fee abstraction, near-instant settlement), and push integrations with wallets, custodians, and compliance firms so mainstream apps can adopt it with minimal friction. The chain’s mainnet launch, reported $2B+ liquidity at launch, and rapid wallet/exchange/analytics integrations are the major public milestones that support the claim that Plasma is quickly becoming a practical payments rail for stablecoins. Continued attention should focus on TVL/bridged liquidity trends, XPL circulating supply/market metrics, validator decentralization progress, and regulatory developments.

@Plasma
#Plasma
$XPL

Snapshot core facts (most load-bearing items)

Project tagline / purpose: “The blockchain built for finance” a Cosmos-SDK Layer-1 focused on DeFi primitives, modular developer modules, and cross-chain interoperability.
Mainnet canonical launch: November 8, 2021 (Injective’s canonical mainnet release).
Consensus / stack: Cosmos SDK + Tendermint (BFT PoS) with MultiVM capability (native EVM integration / MultiVM Token Standard).
Native token (INJ): Total supply = 100,000,000 INJ (documented supply / circulating ≈ 99.97M per market trackers). INJ is used for staking, governance, and protocol security, and Injective published an INJ tokenomics paper (INJ 3.0 / deflationary mechanisms).
TVL & chain activity (live snapshots): DefiLlama shows Injective’s chain TVL and operational metrics (TVL, DEX volumes, chain fees) use these dashboards for real-time monitoring.

Architecture & technical capabilities (detailed)

Injective’s architecture is purpose-built for on-chain finance:

Cosmos SDK foundation + Tendermint consensus yields short block times, BFT finality, and the modular application layer common across Cosmos ecosystems. This underpins low-latency finality and predictable behavior for financial dApps.
MultiVM / native EVM integration (MultiVM Token Standard) Injective supports EVM smart contracts that interoperate with native modules (exchange, staking, governance). The MultiVM Token Standard (MTS) enables EVM contracts to reflect operations on native modules, smoothing cross-environment composability.
Prebuilt “plug-and-play” modules for order books, derivatives, DEX primitives, and token modules designed to shorten developer time-to-market for finance apps. Docs and dev SDKs are published in the official docs and GitHub.
Bridges & cross-chain Injective operates an official bridge (bridge.injective.network) and integrates with external bridge systems such as Wormhole; Injective’s “Ionic” Bridge upgrade aimed to unify one-click bridging across major chains (Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos). That enables bringing liquidity and assets onto Injective from other ecosystems.

Tokenomics & governance (detailed)

INJ total supply & circulating: total supply is 100,000,000 INJ; circulating supply trackers show ~99.97M in circulation. Market aggregators (CoinGecko / CoinMarketCap / Tokenomist) and Injective’s tokenomics paper provide details on allocations and mechanics.
INJ utilities: staking to secure the network, governance voting, paying protocol fees, and participation in security services (e.g., securing rollups and Electro Chains). The team has released an updated tokenomics paper describing burn/deflationary mechanics (INJ 3.0).Governance: on-chain proposals and community governance exist; Injective’s docs and forums summarize active proposals and governance processes. Governance changes have been used to evolve token utility and supply mechanics.

Ecosystem metrics & health

TVL and volumes: DefiLlama aggregates Injective chain metrics (TVL, DEX volumes, perps/spot activity, bridged TVL). These dashboards show real economic usage (not just price action) and are the best place to pull live numbers. At the time of fetch, DefiLlama shows canonical TVL and DEX volumes for Injective.
Market data: INJ price, market cap, 24h volume, and FDV available from CoinGecko / CoinMarketCap and large exchanges (Binance). These sites list circulating supply, market cap, and exchange pairs. (Example: CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap snapshots used above).
Development activity: GitHub (InjectiveLabs / InjectiveFoundation) shows active repos, releases, and commits. Recent repository activity and release artifacts (injective-core, injective-chain) indicate active engineering and release cadence.

Bridges, integrations & liquidity rails

Official Injective Bridge (bridge.injective.network) supports bridging assets from Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Cosmos/IBC, and other chains; used together with Wormhole for wider connectivity. The Ionic upgrade aimed to improve the bridge UX and unify bridging.
Wormhole integration documented how-to guides (Injective blog) explain bridging assets (e.g., SOL → INJ) via Wormhole. This provides fast onramps for Solana and other ecosystems.

Recent upgrades, announcements & notable items (2024–2025)

INJ Tokenomics update Injective published a tokenomics paper describing INJ 3.0 and deflationary/burn mechanics (publication and blog posts referenced). This is a key economic update shaping long-term supply dynamics.
Bridge & Ionic upgrade (Mar 2024) introduced next-gen Injective Bridge to improve unified bridging across major chains.
Native EVM / MultiVM developments (2025) docs and blog content show Injective moving to stronger native EVM support (MultiVM Token Standard and EVM integration), improving developer ergonomics for EVM tooling while retaining native Cosmos module benefits. Injective blog posts and docs (2024–2025) cover these upgrades.
Recent press / partnerships Injective’s blog shows institutional/infra news (examples include institutional validators and ecosystem partnerships). For full list of newest press items consult the Injective blog

Ecosystem projects and use-cases

Injective hosts DEXs, derivatives platforms, AMMs, and other finance primitives. Notable ecosystem projects (examples from ecosystem overviews and aggregator pages) include decentralized exchanges and tokenization projects; DeFiLlama and ecosystem posts list top apps and TVL contributions. For a current roster of apps, check the Injective Hub and DeFi aggregators

Developer resources & how to get started

Documentation: docs.injective.network developer guides, SDKs, RPC / REST endpoints, module docs, and MTS/EVM docs.
GitHub: InjectiveLabs & InjectiveFoundation repos core node code, SDKs, client libraries, and release binaries. Useful repos: injective-core, injective-chain-releases, injective-ts.
Bridging & onboarding: bridge.injective.network and blog guides for Wormhole bridging.

Risks, audit & security postur

Audits & security: Injective documents audits and security programs in docs/blog posts; bridge upgrades and core releases are typically accompanied by security notes. Always verify the latest audit reports on the project site or GitHub.
Cross-chain risk: bridging integrations (Wormhole and others) introduce smart-contract and bridge risk; Ionic and bridge upgrades aim to reduce UX friction, but bridging always carries additional risk vectors. See bridge docs and audit reports before moving large amounts.

Live tracking & where to watch for updates (quicklinks)

(These are the best places to check for live numbers and official releases.)

Injective official site & blog product launches, official announcements.
Injective docs technical references, MTS, RPC, dev guides.
DefiLlama chain TVL, DEX volumes, bridged TVL.
CoinGecko / CoinMarketCap / Binance price, market cap, circulating supply.
GitHub (InjectiveLabs / InjectiveFoundation) code, releases, activity.

Quick numerical summary (as of checked sources)

Mainnet canonical launch: Nov 8, 2021.Total INJ supply: 100,000,000 INJ; circulating ≈ 99.97M per market trackers.
TVL & DEX volumes: live values tracked on DeFiLlama (refer to DeFiLlama for exact USD figures at time of view).
Architecture: Cosmos SDK + Tendermint consensus, MultiVM (native EVM integration).

What I could not (responsibly) do in this single pass

Provide a second-by-second live price or TVL snapshot those figures change minute-to-minute; I linked the canonical dashboards (CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, DeFiLlama) so you can pull live values at the moment you need them.

@Injective
#Injective
$INJ