Crypto Breaking

London-based Legal & General Asset Management has advanced its liquidity funds onto Calastone’s blockchain-powered distribution network, enabling investors to access and transfer fund shares via tokenized infrastructure within a regulated framework. LGAM’s tokenized share classes are issued with permissioned access, allowing authorized users to buy, hold and transfer them while traditional share classes remain available through conventional distribution channels.

The funds, denominated in US dollars, euros and British pounds, total more than £50 billion in assets under management and are designed for capital preservation with same-day liquidity. They invest in high-quality, short-term money market instruments, including government bonds, bank deposits and corporate debt.

Calastone’s network, which sits under SS&C Technologies, provides the end-to-end infrastructure for token creation, order routing, trade aggregation, reconciliation and on-chain settlement. It is integrated with existing transfer agents and fund administration systems, aiming to streamline custody and settlement workflows for tokenized fund shares. The tokenized versions of LGAM’s liquidity funds will initially be issued on Ethereum and other EVM-compatible networks.

LGAM administers roughly £1.2 trillion in assets across public and private markets, while Calastone connects more than 4,500 financial institutions globally, according to the parties involved. The development arrives as UK regulators work toward a broader crypto framework, with the Financial Conduct Authority conducting consultations on custody and trading rules ahead of a planned 2027 regulatory rollout.

Tokenized money market funds grow as asset managers expand distribution

Industry data from RWA.xyz shows tokenized US Treasury products, including money market funds, have climbed to more than $13 billion in total, up from about $8.9 billion at the start of the year. Leading the field is BlackRock’s USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL), with around $2.47 billion in assets, followed by Franklin Templeton’s OnChain US Government Money Fund at roughly $993 million and WisdomTree’s Government Money Market Digital Fund at about $864 million.

Asset managers have been broadening the reach of tokenized money market funds across additional blockchain networks and trading models. In November, Franklin Templeton integrated its Benji platform with the Canton Network to extend distribution of its tokenized money market fund to an institutional blockchain environment, while BlackRock expanded BUIDL to the Solana ecosystem in March. Earlier in the year, WisdomTree enabled 24/7 trading and instant settlement for its tokenized money market fund within a regulated framework.

As these products scale, the sector faces fresh risk considerations. The Bank for International Settlements has warned that mismatches between instant token transfers and slower underlying asset settlement could generate liquidity and contagion risks, underscoring the need for robust risk controls and interoperability across networks.

The trend toward tokenized money market funds reflects a broader push to digitize traditional financial products and improve liquidity and accessibility for institutions and sophisticated investors. Regulators are watching closely, balancing innovation with safeguards as the market tests new settlement and custody paradigms across multi-chain environments.

As the regulatory backdrop evolves, investors and fund managers will be watching three pivotal questions: will permissioned, tokenized distributions gain broader adoption across traditional fund brands; how quickly can on-chain settlement safely scale with real-world assets; and what standards will emerge to mitigate liquidity and settlement mismatches as activity grows across networks?

Readers should stay attentive to ongoing regulatory updates from the FCA and related bodies, as well as cross-network interoperability developments that will determine whether tokenized liquidity funds can become a standard feature of institutional portfolios.

This article was originally published as L&G Brings £50B Liquidity On-Chain via Calastone Tokenized Network on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Mythos Causes Security Concerns

The debate comes after growing interest in the latest AI model Mythos, developed by Anthropic, which has raised alarms in the financial and regulatory sectors. The possibility of the model taking advantage of system vulnerabilities has been noted by government agencies and other large institutions. Regulators have compelled banks to be ready to face more sophisticated cyber threats associated with advanced AI features. Anthropic executives have been talking to policymakers about the risks associated with Mythos. At a recent economic gathering, the company affirmed that it has briefed the Trump administration on the model’s capabilities. The firm also conducted studies indicating that the system could identify and exploit zero-day vulnerabilities in key software platforms when instructed by users.

In the meantime, major crypto exchanges have begun seeking access to the Mythos model to build their defenses. Reports indicate that companies like Coinbase and Binance are already working with Anthropic. Coinbase’s security team noted that discussions continue, and that advanced AI will impact cyber threats and security mechanisms. Megabanks on Wall Street have already taken the lead in accessing the AI model through Anthropic’s limited rollout program. Companies such as JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley have started internal tests. As a result, these entities seek to evaluate how AI can transform offensive and defensive cybersecurity approaches using the model.

Anthropic launched Project Glasswing to regulate access to Mythos and increase testing in a number of organizations. This program enables institutions to test risk in a controlled setting. Additionally, the program can be seen as an extension of an increased push to create balance between innovation and security controls as AI systems expand their potential.

This article was originally published as Trump Is Pro AI Protection as Cryptocurrency Companies Look at Anthropic Mythos on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Goldman Sachs has filed to launch a Bitcoin-linked ETF focused on income generation. The proposed fund uses options strategies instead of holding Bitcoin directly. Bitcoin currently trades near $74,591 after a recent market pullback. The firm aims to offer indirect exposure through existing Bitcoin exchange-traded products. It plans to allocate at least 80% of assets to Bitcoin-linked instruments. This structure separates the fund from traditional spot Bitcoin ETFs.

The move comes as institutions expand crypto offerings despite volatile conditions. Goldman manages over $3.65 trillion in assets globally. The filing signals continued institutional interest in structured crypto products.

Bitcoin Exposure Built Through Layered ETF Holdings

Goldman’s ETF will invest in spot Bitcoin ETFs and related derivatives. This approach allows exposure without directly holding the cryptocurrency. The structure also reflects regulatory considerations tied to commodity ownership.

Unlike direct Bitcoin ETFs, the fund sits one layer above underlying assets. Its returns will mirror gains and losses from those holdings. However, the additional layer may create slight tracking differences.

The firm also uses a Cayman Islands subsidiary to support the structure. This setup helps address regulatory limits in U.S. markets. As a result, the product may reach approval ahead of similar filings.

Options Strategy Targets Income but Caps Upside

The ETF will generate income by selling call options on Bitcoin-linked products. This method allows the fund to collect premiums from option buyers. The strategy converts volatility into a steady income stream.

Goldman expects the overwrite level to range between 40% and 100%. This means a large portion of exposure could be covered by options. However, this coverage limits gains during strong Bitcoin rallies.

If prices exceed option strike levels, the fund faces capped returns. Losses on short positions may offset gains from underlying holdings. Therefore, performance may lag during sharp upward movements.

Competitive Landscape Expands with New ETF Models

The filing adds competition to an evolving Bitcoin ETF market. Firms like BlackRock and Morgan Stanley continue to expand offerings. Their products often focus on direct exposure rather than income strategies.

BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF has attracted significant inflows since launch. Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley recently introduced its own spot-based product. These developments show growing diversification in crypto investment vehicles.

Goldman’s approach differs by prioritizing income over pure price tracking. The strategy may appeal to those seeking yield from volatile assets. However, it also introduces trade-offs between stability and growth.

This article was originally published as Goldman Introduces Options-Based Bitcoin ETF Strategy on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Bitcoin traded near $74,000 as U.S. markets opened, extending a cautious relief rally as investors weighed potential renewed ceasefire talks between the U.S. and Iran. The broader risk-on backdrop supported U.S. equities, with the S&P 500 approaching record territory, while oil prices cooled on bets that geopolitical tensions could ease.

Analysts cautioned that the move might be fragile. While geopolitical headlines offered relief, the underlying tensions—particularly Iran’s uranium enrichment program—remain unresolved. Market observers noted the absence of a clear macro shift, and options markets did not show unambiguous signals of a fresh Bitcoin breakout.

Key takeaways

Bitcoin hovered in the mid-70,000s, with a recent test near 76,000 forming an “equal high” rather than a decisive breakout.

Stocks climbed toward earlier highs, and WTI crude slipped, but the relief rally is viewed as temporary unless durable progress appears on Iran’s enrichment and broader macro risks.

QCP Capital warned that the market is discounting the blockade’s impact but has not seen a lasting consolidation; enrichment remains the core sticking point.

Traders described Bitcoin as “decision time,” with consolidation in place and the options market not fully confirming a clean breakout.

Geopolitics and markets feed crypto sentiment

On the geopolitical front, U.S. President Donald Trump claimed in Truth Social that China opted not to supply weapons to Iran, a development traders weighed as part of a broader diplomatic signal. The comments, alongside lingering tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, contributed to a mixed risk appetite as WTI crude traded below the $90 threshold and the precious metals and debt markets offered mixed directions.

Meanwhile, the S&P 500 reclaimed its yearly open level on Monday and rose to intraday highs near 6,988, closing in on fresh all-time levels. In notes on the stance of markets, QCP Capital emphasized that while equities rebounded and oil softened, the real test lies in the durability of the relief rally. In their Market Color update, the firm cautioned:

“Long-end yields barely budged, gold held its levels, and the bond market, which should be front-running an inflation relief trade more aggressively, did not follow through. When oil drops and the 10-year barely twitches, rates are telling you this is a reduction in headline risk, not a genuine resolution.”

Analysts stressed that Iran’s uranium enrichment remains the core sticking point. Reports indicate Iran continues with elevated enrichment levels, around 60%, far above U.S. demands to keep it below 20%. The gap suggests that headlines alone may not translate into a lasting accord unless Tehran signals meaningful concessions.

As the week unfolds, the market appears to price in relief from geopolitical frictions while maintaining vigilance over the longer-term risk this scenario still poses to energy prices, inflation expectations, and risk assets alike.

Bitcoin’s “decision time” on the charts

Bitcoin’s price action has drawn careful scrutiny from traders who argue that the latest move is more about consolidation than a fundamental breakout. The bounce above the March high of around $76,000 drew commentary from market observers who characterized it as an “equal high” rather than a sweep of previous tops. “Liquidity games still in play,” noted trader Jelle, who added that BTC “technically tagged those previous highs” but did not convincingly clear them, suggesting the move could reverse swiftly unless a clean breakout occurs.

“Liquidity games still in play. BTC technically tagged those previous highs — but I’m viewing this as an equal high rather than a sweep, barely went above it. Keep an eye out for a real sweep above there; that’ll likely catch a lot of traders off guard.”

Other voices urged caution. Daan Crypto Trades summarized that BTC/USD has touched the 76k level and is now in a consolidation phase with a slow, marginally higher trajectory since the start of April. QCP Capital echoed this sentiment, noting that while price action has been “grinding higher,” the options market has not confirmed a clean breakout and the broader regime remains unchanged: the Fed’s stance remains restrictive, and liquidity conditions stay tight. In their words:

“The broader regime has not changed. The Fed is still boxed in, sitting near zero net cuts for the year after the oil shock repriced the easing path, while liquidity conditions remain tight. This is a geopolitical relief rally, not a macro regime shift.”

What comes next for BTC and risk assets

With the macro environment still driven by geopolitical headlines and central-bank policy uncertainty, Bitcoin’s next move hinges on whether relief translates into durable momentum. The market appears to be pricing in a temporary easing of the energy-price premium, but the absence of a confirmed breakout implies that traders should brace for ongoing volatility unless there is credible progress on Iran’s nuclear talks that could alter the risk landscape.

For investors, the key signals to watch include a sustained upside beyond the 76,000 level with broad participation across volatility and derivative markets; a synchronized move across equities, bonds, and commodities; and any tangible progress in talks over Iran’s nuclear program that could alter risk appetite. Until those elements converge, the current rally may reflect tactical repositioning rather than a structural shift in the crypto market.

As geopolitical developments continue to evolve, readers should stay alert to policy cues and headline risk that can rapidly reframe risk tolerance for crypto plays.

In the near term, the market’s focus remains on whether a credible breakthrough is achieved on Iran-related tensions and how such a development would influence liquidity and risk assets, including Bitcoin.

This article was originally published as Bitcoin tests lower support as markets overlook key Iran issue on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

A Danmarks Nationalbank staff paper published this week places Denmark’s crypto exposure in a distinctly cautious light, revealing that only 4% of Danes own cryptocurrencies. The figure has remained flat since 2023 even as crypto markets expanded across Europe. The study, based on a 2025 survey conducted by Epinion, estimates national holdings between roughly $317 million and $847 million and shows that the typical position is small.

The paper draws on responses from 3,013 citizens aged 15 and older, collected between October and November 2025 through Denmark’s Digital Post system. Respondents could answer online or by phone, and the sample was weighted to reflect national demographics. Alongside the ownership rate, the report highlights how Danish crypto activity is distributed and what factors appear to influence adoption, including historical banking norms and tax treatment.

Key takeaways

Only 4% of Danes own cryptocurrency, a share unchanged since 2023.

Among holders, most positions are under 10,000 Danish kroner (about $1,570); national exposure is estimated at $317 million to $847 million.

Indirect exposure through crypto-linked stocks and exchange-traded products stands at about $211 million, roughly 0.4% of total equity holdings.

Crypto ownership skews toward younger, higher-income individuals; participation declines sharply after age 60.

Retention and custody patterns show 70%–75% of users rely on service providers, while 20%–30% self-custody assets; Danske Bank began offering crypto exposure via BTC and ETH ETFs earlier this year.

Denmark’s crypto footprint versus Europe

The National Bank’s assessment places Denmark toward the lower end of crypto adoption in Europe. The paper notes that other European countries—such as Norway and Finland—along with the United Kingdom, report crypto ownership rates above 10% of their populations, indicating a broader regional ascent. The disparity underscores how local factors shape investor behavior even as global interest in digital assets grows.

Several explanations surface in the report for Denmark’s slower uptake. The Danish banking system has historically taken a cautious stance toward crypto, with banks rarely enabling purchases on their platforms and often discouraging crypto investments as high-risk. The analysis also cites earlier asymmetric tax treatment as a potential dampener on widespread adoption, suggesting that regulatory and fiscal clarity could be pivotal in shifting attitudes over time.

Banking shifts, investor attitudes, and regulatory context

Despite the cautious backdrop, institutional moves are beginning to reshape access. Earlier this year, Danske Bank—the country’s largest lender—began permitting customers to invest in crypto exposure through exchange-traded products tied to Bitcoin and Ethereum. The bank characterized the shift as part of a broader trend of growing demand for crypto exposure among clients, coupled with a clearer regulatory framework at the European level, including developments around the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).

While the Danmarks Nationalbank study confirms that most Danes remain wary of crypto as a daily payments method, the fact that a major bank is offering regulated crypto access suggests a potential for incremental uptake. Regulatory clarity, particularly from MiCA and any subsequent EU iterations, is singled out as a key factor shaping future adoption. The paper reinforces that, for many Danes, crypto remains an investment play rather than a transactional technology.

What to watch next for Danish crypto exposure

Several dynamics will likely determine whether Denmark’s crypto footprint grows. First, stricter or clearer EU-wide rules could lower perceived risk and encourage more institutions to offer regulated products. Second, tax policy changes—if pursued—could alter the cost-benefit calculus for individual investors and wealth managers. Third, ongoing shifts in custody infrastructure and product availability (for example, more self-hosted options or regulated custody services) may affect how Danes choose to hold crypto assets.

Overall, the NatBank’s survey paints a picture of a crypto market that has yet to become mainstream in Denmark, despite pockets of growing interest. The alignment (or misalignment) between regulatory signals, tax treatment, and bank-driven access will be critical to watch in the coming months as European markets continue to mature in their approach to digital assets.

What remains uncertain is how swiftly these systemic factors will translate into higher participation, especially among younger cohorts who have historically driven crypto adoption elsewhere. As MiCA 2 and related national policies evolve, observers will be watching whether Denmark’s modest baseline remains unchanged or begins to pick up pace in the next wave of retail involvement.

This article was originally published as Denmark’s 4% Crypto Ownership Highlights EU Adoption Gap on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

eToro has announced an agreement to acquire Zengo, a self-custodial crypto wallet provider, to combine eToro’s global, multi-asset platform with Zengo’s wallet technology. The move aims to broaden self-custody options and accelerate access to on-chain finance, linking traditional investing with on-chain infrastructure as digital assets evolve. The press release notes that the combination could support tokenized assets and emerging decentralized trading models, including prediction markets and perpetuals, while maintaining e- toro’s broad investing ecosystem. The transaction remains subject to customary closing conditions and reflects eToro’s long-term strategy to expand digital asset capabilities.

Key points

Acquisition merges eToro’s multi-asset platform with Zengo’s non-custodial wallet technology to broaden self-custody capabilities.

Zengo offers on- and off-ramp capabilities, token swaps, staking, and access to decentralized applications on a wallet powered by MPC cryptography.

The deal supports evolving digital asset use cases, including tokenized assets and decentralized trading models such as prediction markets and perpetuals.

The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and reflects eToro’s long-term strategy to expand digital asset capabilities.

Why it matters

By bringing Zengo’s self-custodial wallet into its ecosystem, eToro could give users more control over private keys and on-chain access while staying within a regulated, multi-asset platform. The arrangement signals a strategic bet on self-custody as part of mainstream investing and could shape how readers engage with digital assets through tokenized assets and on-chain trading. This approach aligns with eToro’s broader strategy to broaden access to digital assets within its regulated ecosystem.

What to watch

Progress toward closing conditions and regulatory approvals.

Integration timeline for Zengo technology into the eToro platform and any related product roadmap.

Any announcements of new self-custody features or on-chain services after closing.

Disclosure: The content below is a press release provided by the company or its PR representative. It is published for informational purposes.

eToro Acquires Zengo to Expand Self-Custodial Crypto Capabilities

Abu Dhabi, UAE -15 April 2026: eToro, the trading and investing platform, has entered into an agreement to acquire Zengo, a leading self-custodial crypto wallet provider, in a move that deepens eToro’s digital asset capabilities and accelerates its strategy of connecting traditional finance with on-chain infrastructure and the crypto native economy.

The acquisition brings together eToro’s global multi-asset platform and distribution with Zengo’s non-custodial wallet technology, supporting Zengo’s next phase of growth while expanding eToro’s digital asset capabilities.

The transaction strengthens eToro’s ability to support evolving digital asset use cases, including tokenized assets and emerging decentralized trading models such as prediction markets and perpetuals, as these markets develop.

Yoni Assia, Co-founder and CEO of eToro, said: “We believe the future of finance will be increasingly digital, decentralized and user-controlled, with self-custody playing an important role in that evolution. Zengo has built an innovative and secure wallet experience, and this acquisition will enable us to accelerate its growth while continuing to provide users with choice in how they access digital assets.

“As we often say, crypto downtimes are the time to build and this acquisition reflects that long-term approach. At the same time, we continue to demonstrate the strength of our diversified business model. We’ve seen strong capital market activity so far this year, with commodity trading accounting for 60% of trading commissions by asset class in Q1 2026, with commodities trading volume nearly 4x higher year over year. This growth was driven by shifting global macro dynamics, our standing as a top-tier global multi-asset platform, and our strategic expansion of 24/7 trading, including gold and oil.”

Founded in 2018, Zengo is a pioneer in multi-party computation (MPC) cryptography and provides a market-leading crypto wallet, known for its keyless wallet architecture designed to enhance security while simplifying self-custody. Zengo offers a full-service crypto experience, including on- and off-ramp capabilities, token swaps, staking and access to decentralized applications, making it one of the most comprehensive consumer self-custodial solutions in the market.

“From day one, Zengo has focused on making self-custody simple and secure for everyday users,” said Ouriel Ohayon, Co-founder and CEO of Zengo. “Joining eToro allows us to accelerate that mission at a global scale. Together, we can expand access to self-custody and on-chain finance while connecting it to a broader investing ecosystem that bridges traditional and on-chain finance.”

Notes
The deal is subject to customary closing conditions.

Media contact
pr@etoro.com

About eToro
eToro is the trading and investing platform that empowers you to invest, share and learn. We were founded in 2007 with the vision of a world where everyone can trade and invest in a simple and transparent way. Today we have over 40 million registered users from 75 countries. We believe there is power in shared knowledge and that we can become more successful by investing together. So we’ve created a collaborative investment community designed to provide you with the tools you need to grow your knowledge and wealth. On eToro, you can hold a range of traditional and innovative assets and choose how you invest: trade directly, invest in a portfolio, or copy other investors. You can visit our media centre here for our latest news.

About Zengo
Zengo Wallet is the most secure self-custodial cryptowallet, trusted by over 2 million individuals and businesses in 180+ countries. Since 2018, no Zengo wallet has ever been hacked. Zengo Pro includes advanced features like Bitcoin Vaults, an inheritance-style feature, and now, heavily discounted fees on purchase. Zengo Business offers institutional-grade security and team wallets for SMBs and enterprises. Powered by MPC cryptography, Zengo has no seed phrase vulnerability and is backed by Insight Partners, Tether, and other leading investors.

Disclaimers
Zengo’s non-custodial wallet is a separate product from eToro’s regulated exchange services. Access to Web3 services through the wallet, including decentralized applications, token swaps, and staking, is not a regulated activity and is not offered, managed, or guaranteed by any eToro regulated entity. Users interact directly with third-party protocols and are responsible for their own actions.

eToro is a multi-asset investment platform. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk. Past performance is not an indication of future results.

eToro is a group of companies that are authorised and regulated in their respective jurisdictions. The regulatory authorities overseeing eToro include:

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK

The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) in Cyprus

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in Australia

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the Seychelles

The Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) of the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) in the UAE

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in Singapore

eToro USA Securities Inc., registered with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and member of FINRA and SIPC

eToro USA LLC state and FinCEN (31000318247697) registered

eToro NY LLC hold licenses with the State of New York (MTL #104940 and VC #122584)

This article was originally published as eToro to Acquire Zengo to Expand Self-Custodial Crypto Capabilities on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Markets are navigating ongoing geopolitical uncertainty with volatility persisting, yet signals of cautious resilience are emerging. The release describes a blended picture where crypto momentum interacts with traditional markets amid potential diplomatic progress and ongoing supply considerations. Bitcoin has risen about 5% over the past week and trades near $75,000, on track for a third consecutive weekly gain. Oil has moved back below $100 as expectations for diplomatic developments support risk assets. The report also notes Iran’s exploration of Bitcoin for payments tied to maritime transit through the Strait of Hormuz and a possible second round of US-Iran talks ahead of a ceasefire deadline. Near-term volatility may persist.

Key points

Bitcoin up about 5% over the past week, trading near $75,000 and on track for a third straight weekly gain.

Oil prices retreat below $100 as diplomatic expectations influence risk assets and supply concerns persist in the Persian Gulf.

Iran is exploring Bitcoin for payments related to maritime transit through the Strait of Hormuz.

A potential second round of US-Iran peace talks could occur within days ahead of the ceasefire deadline, suggesting near-term volatility.

Why it matters

This combination matters because crypto momentum, energy markets, and geopolitical dynamics intersect in a volatile environment. A sustained Bitcoin rally can influence risk sentiment for digital assets, while oil movements interact with inflation and rate expectations. Iran’s reported use of Bitcoin for a real-world payment flow hints at broader crypto infrastructure uptake. The prospect of renewed talks adds a political factor that could ease or renew volatility, making near-term developments important for traders and investors.

What to watch

Possible second round of US-Iran talks within days and any ceasefire timeline updates.

Updates on Iran’s Bitcoin payments plans for Strait of Hormuz transit.

Bitcoin price behavior around the $75,000 level and any breaks above or below key levels.

Disclosure: The content below is a press release provided by the company or its PR representative. It is published for informational purposes.

Bitcoin Rallies and Oil Pulls Back as Markets Show Signs of Stability

Abu Dhabi, UAE -15 April 2026: Global markets continue to navigate a period of heightened volatility, but recent trends suggest investors are becoming more resilient and adaptive in the face of ongoing geopolitical uncertainty.

Investor sentiment appears to be stabilising, with markets increasingly absorbing negative headlines more efficiently than in previous weeks. Developments that once triggered sharp selloffs are now being digested with greater composure, indicating a shift from reactive behaviour to more measured decision-making.

Cautious optimism is emerging as reports suggest a second round of US-Iran peace talks could take place within days, ahead of the upcoming ceasefire deadline. This prospect is supporting risk assets, as investors rotate away from defensive positioning and cautiously re-enter the market. However, uncertainty remains elevated, and in the absence of a concrete resolution, two-way volatility is expected to persist.

Bitcoin has continued to demonstrate resilience during the current conflict, rising approximately 5% over the past week and trading near $75,000. The asset is on track for its third consecutive week of gains and is up around 9% month-to-date, positioning it for its strongest monthly performance since May 2025. Despite this momentum, Bitcoin remains roughly 40% below its all-time high.

Adding to the constructive narrative around digital assets are reports that Iran is exploring the use of Bitcoin for payments related to maritime transit through the Strait of Hormuz. This development reinforces the growing perception that cryptocurrencies could become increasingly embedded in real-world economic infrastructure.

Meanwhile, oil prices have retreated below the $100 mark, reflecting easing tensions and expectations of diplomatic progress. However, a meaningful portion of supply from the Persian Gulf remains offline, which could place upward pressure on prices in the near term. Persistent supply constraints would have broader implications for inflation, interest rate expectations, and overall market stability.

Josh Gilbert Market Analyst At Etoro

Commenting on the current market environment, Josh Gilbert, Market Analyst at eToro, said:
“Investors are showing a notable shift in behaviour. Rather than reacting impulsively to geopolitical headlines, we’re seeing a more resilient approach to navigating uncertainty. While there are tentative signs of improvement, markets remain highly sensitive to developments, and volatility is likely to remain a defining feature in the near term.”

About eToro
eToro is the trading and investing platform that empowers you to invest, share and learn. Founded in 2007 with the vision of a world where everyone can trade and invest in a simple and transparent way, today eToro has 40 million registered users from 75 countries.

eToro believes in the power of shared knowledge and that investors can become more successful by investing together. The platform has built a collaborative investment community designed to provide users with the tools they need to grow their knowledge and wealth. On eToro, users can hold a range of traditional and innovative assets and choose how they invest: trade directly, invest in a portfolio, or copy other investors.

Visit eToro’s media centre for the latest news.

This article was originally published as Bitcoin Rallies and Oil Retreats as Markets Stabilize on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

China equities are navigating a global oil shock, according to eToro’s latest market commentary. The note ties March trade data to how higher oil prices can reverberate through the economy, noting slower export growth alongside a sharp rise in imports driven by energy and commodity purchases. While such shocks can push up input costs and pressure margins in the near term, the material emphasizes that the market impact is often reflected in valuations as investors adjust expectations. The write-up also points to likely beneficiaries, sector rotations, and the ongoing role of policy support in shaping the near-term outlook.

Key points

Export growth slowed to 2.5% in March while imports jumped nearly 28%, driven by energy and commodities.

Frontloading of energy imports amid supply uncertainty suggests near-term input-cost pressure and potential margin effects.

Energy-sensitive sectors such as oil, shipping, and logistics may see stronger pricing power; AI and energy-security themes remain supported by policy tailwinds and high-tech exports.

Why it matters

For readers and investors, the report outlines how a commodity-price shock can influence market dynamics in China—from trade patterns to sector rotation—and why policy context matters for near-term sentiment and positioning.

What to watch

Oil-price trajectories and energy-import trends that could signal further frontloading or shifts in demand.

Near-term sector rotation, particularly toward energy, shipping, and logistics, and away from more exposed areas.

Policy signals and ongoing momentum in high-tech exports that could sustain AI-related and energy-security themes.

Disclosure: The content below is a press release provided by the company or its PR representative. It is published for informational purposes.

China equities navigate oil shock as trade data signals shifting dynamics

Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates – April 15, 2026: China’s equity markets are adjusting to the impact of rising oil prices, as the latest March trade data offers an early indication of how the shock is feeding through the economy, according to eToro’s latest market commentary.

China’s export growth slowed to 2.5% in March, while imports surged nearly 28% – the fastest pace since 2021 – driven by a sharp increase in purchases of oil and other commodities. This pattern suggests a degree of frontloading in energy and commodity imports amid ongoing supply uncertainty, a trend observed during previous periods of market disruption.

Historically, such shocks tend to raise input costs and weigh on corporate margins in the near term. However, the impact is often reflected more significantly in market valuations rather than immediate earnings deterioration, as companies and investors adjust expectations.

Lale Akoner Global Markets Analyst At Etoro

Lale Akoner, Global Market Analyst at eToro, commented: “China equities are navigating the oil shock in real time, with trade data highlighting how quickly the effects are being priced in. The surge in imports, particularly in energy and commodities, points to frontloading behaviour as businesses respond to supply uncertainty.”

She added: “From an investment perspective, energy-sensitive sectors such as oil, shipping, and logistics are likely to benefit from stronger pricing power in this environment. At the same time, structural themes like AI and energy security remain supported by policy tailwinds and global demand, as reflected in continued strength in high-tech exports.”

Despite near-term volatility, broader market fundamentals remain underpinned by policy support, with the Chinese state continuing to play a stabilising role. The current environment is also driving sector rotation, particularly towards industries that can better absorb or pass on rising input costs.

Akoner concluded: “With oil acting as a catalyst for sector rotation, the focus for investors remains clear: stay selective, lean into defensive positioning, and treat volatility as an opportunity rather than a signal of deterioration.”

Media Contact
PR@etoro.com

About eToro:
eToro is the trading and investing platform that empowers you to invest, share and learn. We were founded in 2007 with the vision of a world where everyone can trade and invest in a simple and transparent way. Today we have 40 million registered users from 75 countries. We believe there is power in shared knowledge and that we can become more successful by investing together. So we’ve created a collaborative investment community designed to provide you with the tools you need to grow your knowledge and wealth. On eToro, you can hold a range of traditional and innovative assets and choose how you invest: trade directly, invest in a portfolio, or copy other investors. You can visit our media centre here for our latest news.

Disclaimers:
Not investment advice. eToro is a multi-asset investment platform. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk.

Regulation and License Numbers:

Middle East
eToro (ME) Limited, is licensed and regulated by the Abu Dhabi Global Market (“ADGM”)’s Financial Services Regulatory Authority (“FSRA“) as an Authorised Person to conduct the Regulated Activities of (a) Dealing in Investments as Principal (Matched), (b) Arranging Deals in Investments, (c) Providing Custody, (d) Arranging Custody and (e) Managing Assets (under Financial Services Permission Number 220073) under the Financial Services and Market Regulations 2015 (“FSMR”). Registered Office and its principal place of business: Office 26 and 27, 25th floor, Al Sila Tower, ADGM Square, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

This article was originally published as China equities navigate oil shock as trade data shifts dynamics on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Fireblocks is expanding its institutional toolbox with a new feature called Earn, designed to channel idle stablecoin balances into on-chain lending strategies powered by Aave and Morpho. The company rolled Earn out in Early Access for its customers, pairing a Sentora-curated Morpho vault with direct access to Aave’s stablecoin lending markets.

In describing the product, Fireblocks emphasized that Earn targets capital that sits idle between settlement windows and deployment cycles. The company said that Earn gives institutions native access to on-chain lending while keeping the same controls and governance familiar from their existing workflows.

Fireblocks disclosed that Earn’s rollout follows a broader surge in stablecoin activity among institutions. The firm reported roughly $6 trillion in stablecoin transfer volume in 2025 across more than 2,400 institutional clients, up about 300% from the previous year. This acceleration underscores growing demand among traditional finance and crypto-native entities to monetize on-chain liquidity without relinquishing risk controls.

Earn arrives as part of a broader trend: several platforms are launching institutional gateways to decentralized lending to convert idle stablecoins into constructive yield, using regulated, institution-friendly interfaces. Competitors in this space include Aave Horizon, Coinbase Prime, Anchorage Digital, Nexo Institutional and Spark Institutional Lending, among others.

Fireblocks noted that it would not publish a fixed yield target for Earn. Any returns would be generated by the underlying lending protocols and would be variable, not guaranteed, and could be zero.

Top decentralized lending protocols by total value locked (TVL).

Aave remains the leading decentralized lending protocol by TVL, with about $25.9 billion in total value locked, followed by Morpho at roughly $7.67 billion, according to DeFiLlama data. The arrangement with Earn thus leverages the two protocols’ liquidity pipelines to provide institutional users with on-chain exposure mediated through Fireblocks’ compliance and custody framework.

Key takeaways

Earn enables Fireblocks clients to deploy idle stablecoins into on-chain lending via a Morpho vault (Sentora-curated) and direct access to Aave’s stablecoin markets.

The feature is available in Early Access for existing Fireblocks customers, emphasizing risk controls and governance already familiar to institutions.

Fireblocks cautions that returns depend on the underlying protocols and are variable, with no guaranteed yields.

Market dynamics show institutions transferring trillions in stablecoins, with Fireblocks reporting $6 trillion in 2025 across 2,400+ clients—up 300% year over year.

The competitive landscape for institutional stablecoin lending includes Aave Horizon, Coinbase Prime, Anchorage Digital, Nexo Institutional and Spark Institutional Lending, among others, illustrating a crowded gateway space.

A gateway to on-chain lending for institutions

Earn represents a deliberate attempt to harmonize the allure of on-chain lending with the risk controls and oversight demanded by enterprise clients. By wrapping direct access to Aave’s stablecoin markets within a curated Morpho vault, Fireblocks aims to reduce the operational complexity that often accompanies DeFi participation for large organizations. The approach mirrors a broader shift in the market: institutions want the yield opportunities of decentralized finance, but within regulated and auditable frameworks that align with their internal treasury policies.

Michael Shaulov, Fireblocks’ co-founder and CEO, described Earn as a way to unlock idle capital without forcing institutions to abandon their established risk posture. “For the first time, institutions can put those balances to work through onchain lending strategies curated by established institutional names, inside the same platform, under the same controls they already run,” he said.

Scale, idle capital and the race for an institutional gateway

The market context for Earn is underscored by rapid growth in stablecoin usage among institutional participants. Fireblocks’ own figures show a substantial expansion in stablecoin transfers in 2025, a year that saw the platform support heavy flows across its network of clients. The trend reflects both the expanding demand for liquidity efficiency and the willingness of institutions to experiment with on-chain instruments as a complement to traditional custody and settlement workflows.

As more players enter the space, the appeal of a unified access point—where custody, accounting, settlement, and lending controls converge—grows. Yet the space remains nuanced: while on-chain lending can improve idle capital utilization, it also exposes institutions to protocol risk, smart contract risk, and fluctuating yields. The message from Fireblocks and its peers is clear—participation comes with the caveat of variable returns and no yield guarantees.

Deliberate stack: Aave, Morpho and the DeFi backbone

Beyond the user experience, the Earn announcement spotlights the enduring role of core DeFi protocols in institutional access. Aave stands as the largest decentralized lending protocol, with tens of billions in liquidity relative to other platforms. Morpho, built atop Aave’s base, provides additional routing and optimization capabilities for lenders and borrowers, contributing a meaningful portion of the on-chain liquidity pipeline. DeFiLlama’s latest data places Aave at approximately $25.9 billion in TVL and Morpho at around $7.67 billion, illustrating how these protocols underpin institutional-grade lending channels.

Fireblocks’ decision to anchor Earn in Aave and Morpho reflects a broader industry pattern: custodial platforms seek to offer regulated, enterprise-ready on-chain exposure while leveraging the deep liquidity and reputation of established DeFi primitives. As more institutions experiment with on-chain lending, the quality and resilience of the underlying protocols will become a focal point for risk management teams and investors alike.

Broader Fireblocks expansion: custody, accounting and regulatory posture

Earn arrives as Fireblocks continues mounting its institutional stack. In late 2025, Fireblocks Trust Company joined forces with Galaxy, Bakkt and others to launch a crypto custody framework operating under the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS). The move was designed to meet rising demand for regulated custody solutions from large institutions and to provide a compliant landing zone for DeFi exposure, as reported by Cointelegraph at the time.

Looking ahead, Fireblocks also expanded its technical footprint with the January 2026 acquisition of the crypto accounting platform TRES for $130 million. The acquisition signals a broader push to provide tax compliance infrastructure and operational visibility that institutional clients require when engaging with tokenized assets and on-chain activity. Taken together, Earn, the custody framework and the accounting capability position Fireblocks not just as a gateway to DeFi, but as a comprehensive, enterprise-grade operating system for institutional crypto activity.

What this means for investors, users and builders

Earn’s introduction highlights a few key dynamics shaping the institutional crypto landscape. First, the appeal of on-chain lending is unmistakable: it offers potential yield modulation for idle stablecoins while integrating within a governance and controls framework familiar to risk officers. Second, the market remains competitive, with multiple gateway solutions competing to offer reliable access points to DeFi lending. Third, the broader Fireblocks strategy—combining custody, accounting and on-chain investment products—illustrates a path toward more integrated institutional crypto services that could become the norm if adoption continues to accelerate.

As the ecosystem matures, readers should monitor how Earn and similar offerings handle risk—with particular attention to protocol-level shocks, liquidity shocks, and regulatory developments that could influence on-chain engagement for institutions. The coming quarters will reveal how these gateways adapt to evolving user demand, yield dynamics, and the ever-present need for robust controls in a rapidly expanding market.

According to Fireblocks’ own disclosures, Earn’s success will hinge not on a single metric but on the reliability of the underlying protocols and the ability of the platform to maintain institutional-grade governance while enabling meaningful idle-capital deployment.

In the near term, investors and builders will want to watch for broader adoption metrics, evolutions in custody and tax reporting tooling, and any changes in the regulatory landscape that could shape the appetite for on-chain lending among enterprises.

Source data and context include Fireblocks’ Earn announcement via its press release, DeFiLlama’s TVL figures for Aave and Morpho, and industry reporting on Fireblocks’ custody framework and TRES acquisition. The combination of these elements suggests a growing, albeit nuanced, trajectory for institutional participation in DeFi lending.

This article was originally published as Fireblocks Debuts Institutional Yield Tool for Stablecoins on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

UAE investors shifted toward software and AI infrastructure shares in Q1 2026, according to eToro data. The press release documents which stocks saw the largest gains and how UAE holders responded to ongoing market volatility, including a notable jump in holders for ServiceNow and Adobe as their prices trended lower. It also highlights AI hardware and memory players such as Super Micro Computer, Micron, and Oracle as popular buys, and notes ongoing attention to mega-cap tech. The release frames these moves as selective conviction rather than broad risk-off behavior, with comments from eToro’s MENA MD.

Key points

ServiceNow led Q1 2026 risers with a 125% increase in holders as the stock fell about 32%, while announcing partnerships with OpenAI and Anthropic.

AI infrastructure names Super Micro Computer (+65%), Micron (+39%), and Oracle (+38%) also saw notable holder increases in Q1 2026.

Adobe rose 54% in holders despite roughly 25% price decline and CEO leadership changes noted in the period.

Micron exception: posted stock gains driven by momentum in AI memory demand and limited new supply.

Top holdings snapshot: NVIDIA remained first; Amazon rose to second; Tesla third; Microsoft fourth; Apple fifth in the rankings.

Why it matters

These data points suggest UAE investors are selectively engaging with AI and enterprise tech, seeking long-term value amid volatility. The dip-buying pattern in software and AI infrastructure hints at confidence in AI-enabled growth, rather than a blanket risk-off stance. For readers tracking regional sentiment, the mix of mega-cap leaders and niche AI names indicates which parts of the tech value chain are drawing attention in the UAE at the start of 2026.

What to watch

Updated data after 31 March 2026 will show whether the tilt toward software and AI infrastructure persists.

ServiceNow’s partnerships with OpenAI and Anthropic may influence investor sentiment.

Watch for changes in the top held rankings (NVIDIA, Amazon, Tesla, Microsoft, Apple) in upcoming quarters.

Disclosure: The content below is a press release provided by the company or its PR representative. It is published for informational purposes.

UAE Investors Hunt Value in AI and Enterprise Tech Amid Market Volatility

Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates – April 15, 2026: Against a backdrop of geopolitical conflict in the Gulf and rising investments in AI, retail investors increased their exposure to software and AI infrastructure stocks whose share prices have taken a hit in the first quarter of 2026, according to the latest data from trading and investing platform, eToro.

eToro looked at which companies saw the largest proportional change in holders quarter-on-quarter (table 1) and also examined the 10 most held stocks on the platform among users based in the UAE (table 2).

Software and SaaS names featured prominently in the Q1 top risers list, suggesting UAE investors used the sector-wide sell-off to buy the dip. ServiceNow topped the list with a 125% jump in holders as its share price fell around 32% in Q1, although in the same quarter it announced partnerships with AI heavyweights OpenAI and Anthropic. Adobe ranked third (54% increase in holders) even as the stock came under pressure over concerns about its ability to defend its core software business against AI disruption. Shares were down about 25% by mid-March, along with news that the chief executive would step down, suggesting UAE investors were buying during the pullback.

AI infrastructure was another clear theme in Q1: Super Micro Computer (+65%) in second place, followed by Micron (+39%) in fifth, and Oracle (+38%) in sixth. Investors appear to have bought into a late-quarter sell-off with Super Micro Computer. The stock had traded largely sideways before tumbling 33% after US prosecutors charged the co-founder over an alleged scheme to smuggle Nvidia-powered servers to China. Oracle also fits the buy-the-dip theme. The stock has been volatile amid concerns about spending tied to its AI cloud expansion.

The standout exception was Micron, one of the few names in the group to post stock price gains over the quarter. The move was driven by stronger momentum from surging demand for AI memory chips and limited new supply.

George Naddaf Managing Director Mena At Etoro

George Naddaf, Managing Director at eToro (MENA), said: “In Q1, UAE investors approached technology with selectivity and opportunism. Some of the companies that drew the strongest increase in holders had fallen to around 25% to 33%, suggesting investors were willing to buy into the sell-off where they still saw long-term value.”

He added: “Despite talk about the ‘Saaspocalypse’, the idea that AI will dismantle traditional SaaS business models, UAE investors showed sustained interest in software. They are honing in on companies that they believe have a clear role in the tech value chain and potential for monetisation. While geopolitical tensions added to market volatility, the pattern in holdings suggests UAE investors were driven more by sector conviction than by a broad risk-off mindset.”

Other Q1 risers spanned multiple sectors. Investors pushed e.l.f. Beauty to fourth place by increasing holdings 52%. They also drove gains in Duolingo, Gorilla Technology, Hims & Hers Health, and SoFi Technologies, highlighting interest in companies across digital education, IT services, telehealth, and fintech.

Q1’s ‘top fallers’ list featured a mix of industries. Twist Bioscience Corporation led the pack with a 90% decrease in holders, followed by Okta (-49%) and CoreWeave (-47%). BioMarin Pharmaceuticals also saw a big decline, with holders down 35% QoQ.

The most widely held stocks were largely unchanged from last quarter, with only minor reshuffles in the top half. NVIDIA held onto first place, while Amazon rose to second, and Microsoft to fourth. Tesla slipped to third and Apple to fifth, while positions six to ten remain unchanged.

Naddaf remarked: “Local investors’ selective approach to technology is further evidenced by the fact that AI and tech companies feature in both the risers and fallers lists. They appear to be making efforts to distinguish between the winners and laggards of the AI revolution.”

Looking at the most held ranking, he added: “It suggests UAE investors are continuing to treat these names as core positions rather than short-term trades. NVIDIA held onto the top spot, while Amazon moved up to second and Microsoft climbed to fourth, but the ranking is largely unchanged. This points to continued conviction in mega-cap technology companies contributing to AI infrastructure and enterprise applications. In a quarter marked by uncertainty, that kind of stability points to a confidence in scale, earnings visibility, and relevance.”

Table 1: Shows which stocks have seen the biggest proportional increase and decrease in holders on the eToro platform in the UAE, quarter-on-quarter.

Uae Investors Hunt Value In Ai And Enterprise Tech Amid Volatility

Table 2: Shows stocks most widely held by eToro users in the UAE, and their position last quarter.

Uae Investors Hunt Value In Ai And Enterprise Tech Amid Volatility

Notes:

Past performance is not an indication of future results.

The tables compare data from the eToro platform on the final day of Q1 2026 with the final day of Q4 2025. The data refers to funded accounts of eToro users in the UAE.

The data in the first table shows the 10 stocks that have seen the largest proportional increases and decreases in holders on the eToro platform quarter-on-quarter (Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025).

The data in the second table shows the top 10 most-held stock positions (open positions) by investors on the eToro platform at the end of Q1 2026. As the vast majority of stocks traded on eToro are real assets, this data does not include positions held as CFDs.

Stock price data from Yahoo Finance.

All data accurate as of after market close on 31 March 2026.

Media Contact

PR@etoro.com

About eToro:
eToro is the trading and investing platform that empowers you to invest, share and learn. We were founded in 2007 with the vision of a world where everyone can trade and invest in a simple and transparent way. Today we have 40 million registered users from 75 countries. We believe there is power in shared knowledge and that we can become more successful by investing together. So we’ve created a collaborative investment community designed to provide you with the tools you need to grow your knowledge and wealth. On eToro, you can hold a range of traditional and innovative assets and choose how you invest: trade directly, invest in a portfolio, or copy other investors. You can visit our media centre here for our latest news.

Disclaimers:

Not investment advice. eToro is a multi-asset investment platform. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk.

eToro is a group of companies that are authorised and regulated in their respective jurisdictions. The regulatory authorities overseeing eToro include:

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK

The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) in Cyprus

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) in Australia

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the Seychelles

The Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) of the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) in the UAE

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in Singapore

This communication is for information and education purposes only and should not be taken as investment advice, a personal recommendation, or an offer of, or solicitation to buy or sell, any financial instruments. This material has been prepared without taking into account any particular recipient’s investment objectives or financial situation, and has not been prepared in accordance with the legal and regulatory requirements to promote independent research. Any references to past or future performance of a financial instrument, index or a packaged investment product are not, and should not be taken as, a reliable indicator of future results. eToro makes no representation and assumes no liability as to the accuracy or completeness of the content of this publication.

Regulation and License Numbers:

Middle East

eToro (ME) Limited, is licensed and regulated by the Abu Dhabi Global Market (“ADGM”)’s Financial Services Regulatory Authority (“FSRA“) as an Authorised Person to conduct the Regulated Activities of (a) Dealing in Investments as Principal (Matched), (b) Arranging Deals in Investments, (c) Providing Custody, (d) Arranging Custody and (e) Managing Assets (under Financial Services Permission Number 220073) under the Financial Services and Market Regulations 2015 (“FSMR”). Registered Office and its principal place of business: Office 26 and 27, 25th floor, Al Sila Tower, ADGM Square, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

This article was originally published as UAE Investors Hunt Value in AI and Enterprise Tech Amid Volatility on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Bitmine Immersion Technologies posted a $3.82 billion quarterly loss as digital asset values swung widely. The loss occurred despite revenue growth, primarily driven by ether staking rewards.

The company said most of the quarterly loss came from unrealized losses on its digital asset holdings. Bitmine also kept buying ether during the recent market weakness.

Loss Widens as Digital Asset Values Fall

Bitmine reported a net loss of $3.82 billion for the quarter ended Feb. 28, 2026. A year earlier, it posted a net loss of $1.15 million.

For the six months ended Feb. 28, the company reported a net loss above $9 billion. In the same period last year, the loss was $2.1 million.

The latest quarterly result was driven by $3.78 billion in unrealized losses on digital asset holdings. Those losses reflected the change in market value of the company’s crypto assets.

BMNR, the largest Ethereum treasury company, reported a net loss of $3.82 billion in the quarter.

Bitmine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) reported its quarterly financial results for the period ended February 28, 2026, recording a net loss of $3.82 billion for the quarter,… pic.twitter.com/7S2A2gl4xJ

— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) April 15, 2026

Ether Holdings Keep Growing Despite Market Weakness

Bitmine said it held 4.87 million ETH as of April 12. The holding was worth about $10.7 billion at that date.

The company said that amount represented more than 4% of the total ether supply. It also said it had reached 4.04% of supply as of Monday.

Bitmine’s average purchase price for its ether was $2,206 per coin. According to the report, it aims to control 5% of total ether supply.

Chairman Tom Lee said in March, “Bitmine has been buying Ethereum, as we view this pullback as attractive, given the strengthening fundamentals.” He also said, “In our view, the price of ETH is not reflective of the high utility of ETH and its role as the future of finance.”

On Monday, Lee said the company had increased the pace of ether purchases over the prior four weeks. He added, “The Iran war enters its seventh week and this war remains the most important driver of global markets.”

Revenue Rises on Staking and Other Business Lines

Bitmine reported $11.04 million in revenue for the quarter. That was up from $1.5 million in the same period in 2025.

About $10 million of that total came from ether staking rewards. The rest came from leasing, consulting, and self-mining activities.

Lee said the company had staked 3,334,637 ETH, or about 68% of total holdings. He said that level could support $212 million in annualized revenue, based on a 2.89% seven-day yield.

Beyond ether, Bitmine held $719 million in cash as of April 12. It also held 198 bitcoin, a $200 million stake in Beast Industries, and an $85 million stake in Eightco Holdings.

Last week, Bitmine moved its listing to the New York Stock Exchange from NYSE American. Its shares closed down 0.14% at $21.48 on Tuesday.

Market observers noted that the results reflect volatility in digital asset prices, and that Bitmine’s ether accumulation program remains a focal point for its strategy.

This article was originally published as Bitmine Posts $3.82 Billion Quarterly Loss as Ether Prices Hit Holdings Value on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Ripple and Kyobo Life have teamed up to modernize Korean government bond settlement. The partners will test tokenized transactions through Ripple Custody in a regulated institutional setting. Kyobo is the first Tier 1 Korean insurer to take this step with Ripple. Ripple said the model could reduce settlement from two days to near real time.

Ripple and Kyobo Life Begin On-Chain Bond Settlement Work

Ripple announced the partnership in Seoul on April 15, 2026. It is Ripple’s first collaboration with a leading Korean insurance institution. The project centers on tokenized government bond settlement inside a regulated environment. Both companies released the announcement on Wednesday.

Kyobo Life is one of Korea’s largest and oldest life insurers. The company will use Ripple Custody to hold, transfer, and settle tokenized assets. That setup replaces fragmented and manual bond workflows with transparent on-chain execution. The work will start with custody-led settlement flows.

Announcing our partnership with #KyoboLifeInsurance—one of Korea's largest and most established life insurance companies—to explore on-chain financial infrastructure using Ripple Custody: https://t.co/Mk8URCOM8K

Kyobo becomes the first Tier 1 Korean insurer to take this step,…

— Ripple (@Ripple) April 15, 2026

Ripple said custody is the starting point for broader digital asset services. Those services may later include payments, liquidity, and treasury management. The company said the project offers a model for other regulated institutions. Ripple described that path as gradual and regulated.

Ripple Custody Targets Faster Trade Settlement

Government bond trades often settle two business days after execution. Ripple said on-chain settlement can move that timeline closer to real time. Faster settlement can lower counterparty risk and free up capital sooner. That could improve balance sheet use for institutions.

Ripple Custody is built for banks and other regulated financial firms. The platform supports secure movement, record keeping, and settlement activity. It also gives institutions one system for custody and transaction processing. The platform combines custody with settlement support.

Fiona Murray, Ripple’s managing director for Asia Pacific, described Korea as a key market. She said, “It is available, proven, and ready to deploy in Korea today.” She added that Ripple sees a long-term role in Korea. Ripple said the company views this work as part of a broader market effort.

Kyobo Reviews Wider Payment and Market Use

The partners will also review stablecoin-based payment rails for institutional use. Those rails could support round-the-clock transactions within a compliant framework. The firms will also assess technical and regulatory feasibility in Korea. That review covers technology needs and compliance checks.

Jin Ho Park, a senior executive vice president at Kyobo Life, explained the aim. He said, “This is about validating how traditional financial instruments can operate securely on blockchain.” Kyobo linked the work to its wider digital transformation plans. Kyobo said the effort goes beyond digital asset storage.

Ripple said the deal adds to its growth in Korea. The company noted that Korea began licensing remittance payment providers in 2017. The partnership shows how insurers can test digital asset infrastructure inside regulated markets. Ripple also said its Korean business activity has been growing.

This article was originally published as Ripple and Kyobo Life Bring Korean Government Bond Settlement on Chain in Korea on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Goldman Sachs Targets Income-Focused Bitcoin Exposure

Goldman Sachs has filed for a Bitcoin Premium Income ETF with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The product focuses on income generation while offering controlled exposure to Bitcoin price movements. It reflects growing demand for structured crypto products among traditional market participants.

The fund will not hold Bitcoin directly, and it avoids direct spot ownership. Instead, it will invest in shares of existing spot Bitcoin exchange-traded products. This approach allows the bank to offer exposure while managing operational and custody risks.

Additionally, the ETF will use an options overwrite strategy to generate income. This method involves selling options against held positions to collect premiums regularly. As a result, the fund aims to deliver steady income with moderated exposure to price swings.

The strategy limits potential upside, but it also reduces downside risk during market declines. This design suits clients seeking stability and predictable returns over aggressive growth. Therefore, the product aligns with demand for lower-volatility crypto exposure.

Structured Strategy Reflects Shifting Institutional Approach

The ETF introduces a structured format that blends traditional finance techniques with digital asset exposure. Goldman Sachs has adapted familiar income strategies to fit the evolving cryptocurrency market. This move signals deeper integration between legacy finance and digital assets.

Market analysts describe the strategy as tailored for conservative portfolios seeking alternative income streams. The fund sacrifices some price gains in exchange for regular yield generation. Consequently, it positions itself differently from standard spot Bitcoin ETFs.

Moreover, the indirect exposure through existing ETPs adds another layer of diversification. It reduces reliance on a single asset structure while maintaining exposure to Bitcoin trends. This structure also aligns with regulatory and operational preferences.

The filing highlights how banks continue to refine crypto offerings beyond simple price tracking. Institutions now focus on customization, risk control, and income strategies. This shift indicates a broader evolution in how financial firms approach digital assets.

Competition Intensifies After Morgan Stanley ETF Success

The filing follows a strong debut from Morgan Stanley’s recently launched spot Bitcoin ETF. The product introduced aggressive pricing and triggered competition among major asset managers. It set a new benchmark for cost efficiency in Bitcoin ETF offerings.

Morgan Stanley priced its ETF at a low expense ratio, undercutting key competitors in the market. This pricing strategy pressured other firms to adjust their fee structures. As a result, competition has increased across the Bitcoin ETF segment.

Other major players have also entered the space with varying strategies and pricing models. These include funds focusing on direct exposure and others offering hybrid approaches. Goldman Sachs now adds a structured-income-focused option to the mix.

The growing range of products reflects rising institutional interest in Bitcoin-linked investments. Banks continue to expand offerings to capture different segments of market demand. This trend suggests continued innovation and competition in crypto financial products.

This article was originally published as Goldman Sachs Targets Income-Focused Bitcoin Exposure on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Paxos Labs has raised $12 million in a strategic funding round led by Blockchain Capital to scale Amplify, a modular platform designed to bring crypto yield, lending, and stablecoin issuance into a single, developer-friendly integration. The Amplify stack comprises three modules—Earn, Borrow, and Mint—built to help platforms convert idle digital-asset balances into revenue-generating financial services while offering a unified path for onboarding and deployment. In the project’s public announcement, Paxos described Amplify as a single SDK with configurable controls, with Paxos handling liquidity provisioning, counterparty vetting, and backend operations, and sharing a portion of generated revenue with integrating partners.

Early adopters include Aleo, Hyperbeat, and Toku, with Hyperbeat reporting more than $510,000 in assets under management since its April 9 launch. The funding round also featured participation from Robot Ventures, Maelstrom, and Uniswap. Paxos Labs operates as an incubated unit within Paxos, a firm that has processed more than $180 billion in tokenization volume for institutional clients, according to the company.

The Amplify initiative is aimed at platforms that already offer crypto custody or trading, seeking to turn passive digital-asset holdings into active, revenue-generating financial products through a streamlined, turnkey integration.

Key takeaways

Amplify bundles Earn, Borrow, and Mint into a single developer SDK, enabling yield generation, crypto-backed lending, and branded stablecoins without multiple disparate integrations.

The $12 million strategic round signals investor confidence in modular on-chain financial primitives, with Blockchain Capital leading and backers including Robot Ventures, Maelstrom, and Uniswap.

Early traction from partners like Hyperbeat, which has accumulated over half a million dollars in AUM since its launch, suggests real-world demand for integrated yield and lending capabilities on user-held assets.

The move sits within a broader industry push toward yield-bearing crypto products and a shifting regulatory backdrop that debates how such offerings should be overseen in the United States.

Amplify’s modular toolkit and how it works

Earn, Borrow, and Mint form a cohesive suite intended to unlock additional value from digital assets. Earn enables platforms to generate yield on user-held tokens, Borrow provides crypto-backed lending facilities, and Mint allows for the issuance of branded stablecoins. Paxos commits to liquidity management, counterparty vetting, and backend operations, while sharing a portion of the proceeds with integrating partners. The approach is designed to reduce integration complexity for exchanges, wallets, and other crypto service providers that want to augment their offerings without building each component from scratch.

According to the official announcement, Amplify delivers a single, configurable SDK that can be embedded into a platform’s existing stack. Paxos’ role as a liquidity and operational partner aims to streamline onboarding and improve risk controls, enabling tighter integration and faster time-to-market for new financial products tied to digital assets.

Backers, traction, and what it signals for the market

The round’s backers underscore strategic interest in enabling on-chain financial services through interoperable primitives. Blockchain Capital led the fundraising, with participation from Robot Ventures, Maelstrom, and Uniswap, highlighting a mix of traditional crypto-focused investors and prominent DeFi players recognizing Amplify’s potential to scale revenue opportunities tied to user-held digital assets.

Hyperbeat’s reported AUM of over $510,000 since its April 9 launch provides a tangible early signal of demand for yield- and lending-enabled products across partner platforms. Paxos’ longstanding activity in the asset-tokenization space—more than $180 billion in tokenization volume for institutional clients—underpins the credibility of a platform designed to connect custody, trading, and on-chain finance through a unified interface.

Industry context: yield, lending, and regulatory chatter

The Amplify announcement arrives amid a broader wave of platforms expanding beyond custody and trading into yield generation and lending for user-held assets. Notable moves include Kraken’s March integration of a structured products platform from STS Digital to offer options-based strategies on BTC and ETH, and Coinbase’s launch of a tokenized Bitcoin Yield Fund on its Base network to give institutions on-chain access to yield-bearing crypto exposure. In addition, both exchanges have begun offering yield on stablecoins, often by linking to on-chain lending markets.

Institutional-focused providers have also advanced lending against assets held in custody. For example, Anchorage Digital announced a collaboration with Kamino and Solana Company to enable institutions to borrow against staked SOL without moving assets, while Lombard and Bitwise Asset Management teamed up to offer yield and borrowing on Bitcoin through on-chain lending infrastructure.

Beyond product development, policy discussions remain active. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act has grown as a framework proposal to regulate digital assets in the U.S., with industry observers weighing potential implications for yield-bearing products. The American Bankers Association has argued that permitting stablecoin yields could accelerate deposit outflows from smaller banks and raise funding costs, a tension that lawmakers and market participants continue to watch closely.

What to watch next for Amplify and the broader market

Amplify’s success will likely hinge on how quickly more platforms adopt the toolkit and scale deployments across custody and trading ecosystems. The combination of a streamlined SDK, managed liquidity, and revenue-sharing could lower barriers to offering on-chain yield and lending, potentially turning idle balances into recurring revenue streams for a broader slice of the crypto economy. Investors will be watching partner sign-ups, actual yield performance, and how regulatory developments shape the feasibility and design of these products as the market seeks to balance innovation with risk controls.

As platforms experiment with asset-backed lending, yield-bearing stablecoins, and branded on-chain instruments, the market will also assess counterparty risk, liquidity depth, and the sustainability of revenue-sharing models. The coming quarters should reveal whether Amplify’s modular approach translates into broader adoption and meaningful revenue uplift for platforms and their users.

Readers should keep an eye on announcements from Paxos Labs for new partner integrations, updates on liquidity arrangements, and any shifts in regulatory guidance that could impact the deployment of yield and lending features across the crypto ecosystem.

This article was originally published as Paxos Labs Raises $12M to Build Yield, Lending, and Issuance Tools on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

error code: 524

This article was originally published as Ripple, Kyobo Advance Tokenized Bond Settlement in South Korea on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Zerion disclosed that North Korean-affiliated hackers used AI-powered social engineering to extract about $100,000 from the company’s hot wallets last week. In a post-mortem published on Wednesday, the crypto wallet provider confirmed that no user funds, Zerion apps, or infrastructure were compromised, and it proactively disabled the web app as a precautionary measure.

Though the amount is modest by crypto-hacking standards, Zerion’s disclosure reinforces a growing trend: attackers are increasingly targeting human operators with AI-enabled techniques. The incident sits alongside a high-profile episode earlier in the month—a $280 million exploit of Drift Protocol attributed to a North Korea–linked operation—illustrating a broader shift in how threat actors approach crypto firms. The human layer, not firmware or smart contracts, has become a primary entry point for incursions into crypto environments.

Key takeaways

AI-enabled social engineering is emerging as a principal attack vector for DPRK-linked actors, targeting insiders rather than exploiting code bugs alone.

Zerion’s incident involved access to team members’ logged-in sessions, credentials, and private keys held in hot wallets, underscoring a vulnerability in identity and access management.

The same threat cluster is tied to a broader pattern of long-running campaigns that impersonate trusted contacts and brands across common collaboration channels such as Telegram, LinkedIn, and Slack.

Industry researchers have documented a growing toolbox: fake virtual meetings, AI-assisted image and video editing, and other deceptive tactics that reduce the friction for social engineering.

Security analysts warn that the threat extends well beyond exchanges to developers, contributors, and anyone with access to crypto-infrastructure.

AI reshaping the threat landscape

The Zerion incident highlights a shift in how breaches unfold in crypto ecosystems. Zerion stated that the attacker gained access to some team members’ logged-in sessions, credentials, and private keys used for hot wallets. The firm described the event as an AI-enabled social engineering operation, indicating that artificial intelligence tools were deployed to refine phishing messages, impersonations, and other manipulative techniques.

This assessment aligns with earlier findings from industry researchers who have observed DPRK-affiliated groups sharpening their social engineering playbooks. In particular, Security Alliance (SEAL) reported tracking and blocking 164 domains linked to UNC1069 over a two-month window from February to April, noting that the group runs multiweek, low-pressure campaigns across Telegram, LinkedIn, and Slack. The actors impersonate known contacts or reputable brands or leverage access to previously compromised accounts to build trust and escalate access.

“UNC1069’s social engineering methodology is defined by patience, precision, and the deliberate weaponization of existing trust relationships.”

Google’s security arm, Mandiant, has detailed the group’s evolving workflow, including a documented use of fake Zoom meetings and AI-assisted editing of images or videos during the social engineering stage. The combination of deception and AI tools makes it harder for recipients to differentiate legitimate communications from fraudulent ones, increasing the likelihood of successful intrusions.

The DPRK threat surface expands beyond exchanges

Beyond the Zerion case, researchers have emphasized that North Korean threat actors have embedded themselves in crypto ecosystems for years. MetaMask developer and security researcher Taylor Monahan noted that DPRK IT workers have been involved in numerous protocols and projects for at least seven years, underscoring a persistent presence across the sector. The integration of AI tools into these campaigns compounds the risk, enabling more convincing impersonations and streamlined social-engineering workflows.

Analysts from Elliptic have summarized the evolving threat in a blog post, highlighting that the DPRK group operates along two vectors of attack—one sophisticated, another more opportunistic—targeting individual developers, project contributors, and anyone with access to crypto infrastructure. The observation echoes what Zerion and others are seeing on the ground: the barrier to entry for social-engineered breaches is lower than ever, thanks to AI’s ability to automate and tailor deceptive content at scale.

As the narrative broadens, observers stress that the human factor—credentials, session tokens, private keys, and trusted relationships—continues to be the primary entry point. The shift in tactics means companies must defend not only their code and deployments but also the integrity of internal communications and access paths that connect teams to critical assets.

What readers should watch next

Given the cross-cutting nature of these attacks, market participants and builders should monitor several developing threads. First, the Drift Protocol episode and Zerion’s incident together illustrate that DPRK-affiliated actors are pursuing a multi-stage, long-term approach that blends traditional social engineering with AI-augmented content creation. This implies that short-term fixes—such as patching a single vulnerability or alerting on suspicious code—will be insufficient without strengthened identity and access controls across the entire organization.

Second, the expansion of AI-enabled deception into ordinary collaboration channels suggests that defenders should heighten monitoring for anomalous login sessions, unusual privilege escalations, and suspicious impersonations within internal messaging and meeting platforms. As SEAL and Mandiant have shown, attackers leverage pre-existing trust relationships to lower suspicion, making human-level vigilance essential alongside technical controls.

Finally, the broader ecosystem should anticipate continued public reporting and analysis from researchers as more incidents surface. The convergence of AI with social engineering raises questions about regulatory and industry standards for incident response, vendor risk management, and user education. As the industry absorbs these lessons, it will be critical to track how wallets, protocols, and security firms adapt to an attacker playbook that increasingly emphasizes the human element paired with AI tooling.

For ongoing context, readers can review the Drift Protocol exploit analysis tied to the same DPRK-linked activity, the SEAL advisory tracking UNC1069, and Mandiant’s assessment of the group’s techniques, including AI-assisted deception. Commentary from researchers who have studied DPRK actors—such as Taylor Monahan and Elliptic—helps illuminate the depth and persistence of the threat, underscoring that the threat landscape is not only about exposed smart contracts but about how teams defend their people as well as their code.

As this area evolves, developments to watch include new case updates from Zerion and Drift Protocol, any shifts in threat actor tooling, and regulatory responses aimed at improving transparency and resilience in crypto businesses. The key throughline remains clear: the strongest defense combines robust identity hygiene with a vigilant, AI-informed security posture that can detect and deter sophisticated social-engineering campaigns before they strike.

This article was originally published as North Korean Hackers Deploy AI-Driven Social Engineering on Zerion on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Bitcoin researchers led by cypherpunk Jameson Lopp, along with five co-authors focused on quantum security, have put forward a controversial plan to shield the network from a future quantum-enabled theft. The proposal, labeled BIP-361 and titled “Post Quantum Migration and Legacy Signature Sunset,” would be implemented in three stages to migrate coins away from quantum-vulnerable output types — including Satoshi’s widely discussed stash — and to harden the network before quantum computers become practical threats. The draft was posted to GitHub this week as the second installment in the broader plan.

The impetus for the proposal is clear: researchers warn that roughly 1.7 million BTC stored in early P2PK addresses could be at risk if a quantum adversary gains access to powerful quantum hardware. Among these coins is the so‑called Satoshi stash, which some estimate could be valued in today’s dollars at around $74 billion. The aim, the authors argue, is to prevent a scenario in which quantum-enabled theft undermines trust in the Bitcoin network. The plan is framed as a defensive mechanism—a private incentive to upgrade—rather than an offensive maneuver to seize control of others’ funds.

Key takeaways

BIP-361 is a three-phase plan that follows BIP-360’s soft-fork approach and aims to migrate vulnerable coins to quantum-resistant paths, addressing about 34% of Bitcoin’s supply that remains at risk unless moved.

The phases are timed: Phase A begins three years after activation and would stop new BTC from being sent to old-style addresses, requiring users to migrate to quantum-resistant types.

Phase B arrives five years after activation, invalidating old-style signatures and effectively freezing any funds remaining in vulnerable addresses.

Phase C provides a zero-knowledge proof-based recovery mechanism for those who missed the deadline but can still demonstrate ownership via seed recovery, offering a potential rescue path.

The proposal has drawn swift pushback from parts of the Bitcoin community, with critics calling it heavy-handed or confiscatory, arguing it undermines Bitcoin’s ethos of opt-in upgrades.

Context and the technical what-ifs

In February, developers released BIP-360, which proposed a soft fork introducing a new output type known as pay-to-Merkle-root (P2MR). The idea mirrors Bitcoin’s existing Taproot (P2TR) structure but removes the quantum-vulnerable key path from legacy addresses. While BIP-360 would protect funds moving forward, it does not automatically safeguard the substantial portion of the supply that remains vulnerable in old addresses unless owners proactively move funds to quantum-resistant forms.

BIP-361 extends this concept into a staged migration. Three years after activation, Phase A would bar transfers to old-style addresses, forcing users to adopt quantum-secure address formats. Then, five years after activation, Phase B would invalidate old-style signatures altogether, rendering coins in vulnerable addresses effectively unspendable unless they have already migrated. Phase C offers a potential rescue mechanism using zero-knowledge proofs to allow recovery for users who still possess their seed phrases but failed to upgrade in time.

Related: Bitcoin Magazine has noted the debate’s potential hard-fork implications, underscoring that the policy could center the fate of historical coins and alter the network’s long-term security model.

“This is not an offensive attack, rather, it is defensive: our thesis is that the Bitcoin ecosystem wishes to defend itself and its interests against those who would prefer to do nothing and allow a malicious actor to destroy both value and trust.”

Community reaction and the philosophical divide

The plan has ignited a robust discussion about Bitcoin’s core principles and the trade-offs of upgrading a global, permissionless system. Critics argue that forcing upgrades or rendering unupgraded UTXOs unspendable would mark a significant departure from Bitcoin’s ethos of non-coercive change and could set a dangerous precedent for future interventions.

Bitcoin protocol developer and researcher Mark Erhardt, who circulated BIP-361 on social media, faced immediate critique. Responders described the proposal as “authoritarian and confiscatory,” questioning the rationale for mandating upgrades and the legitimacy of rendering old spends invalid.

Other voices weighed in with skepticism as well. Bitcoin Magazine’s editors and contributors have been vocal in challenging the premise, while TFTC founder Marty Bent characterized aspects of the approach as inconsistent with the community’s expectations. Phil Geiger, head of business development at Metaplanet, offered a provocative take on the tension between protection and coercion. The broader sentiment remains unsettled: the consensus on whether a crypto-legalistic safeguard should override voluntary evolution is far from settled.

Cointelegraph reached out to Lopp for comment on the proposal; there was no immediate response at the time of publication. The GitHub draft, however, provides a concrete framework for discussion and potential future forks, even as many stakeholders call for a cautious, community-driven examination of the implications.

For readers tracking the evolution of quantum resilience in Bitcoin, the conversation now shifts from theoretical risk to concrete, staged mitigation. The three-phase design is designed to minimize disruption by letting the ecosystem migrate over time, but it also raises fundamental questions about asset-holding rights, upgrade incentives, and the governance of a decentralized network.

Implications for holders, users, and builders

From a practical standpoint, BIP-361 highlights two enduring tensions in Bitcoin’s path to quantum readiness. First, there is the temptation to act decisively to protect value, especially when the stakes include a multi-trillion-dollar network and the world’s most valuable cryptocurrency by market capitalization. Second, there is the risk that coercive upgrades or automatic penalties could fragment the ecosystem or erode trust among users who prefer to manage their own keys and seeds at their own pace.

For investors and developers, the proposal underscores the importance of forward-looking security models. If the plan progresses, the market could see increased demand for quantum-resistant wallets and services, as well as migrations that push older holders toward newer output types. The timeline—three years to Phase A and five to Phase B—provides a window for infrastructure teams to test compatibility, wallets to implement support for P2MR-like paths, and communities to debate the ethics and practicality of forced upgrades.

As the discussion unfolds, observers will be watching how this approach interacts with existing upgrade narratives, such as soft forks and user-initiated migrations. The zero-knowledge recovery proposed in Phase C is a particularly notable element: it aims to offer a path back to funds for those who missed the deadline, but the feasibility and privacy implications of such a mechanism will require rigorous scrutiny before any real-world deployment.

What to watch next

The BIP-361 draft opens a testing ground for how the Bitcoin community might address quantum threats without waiting for a single, sweeping upgrade. The next steps will likely involve broader discussions on GitHub, more technical vetting of the P2MR architecture, and public comment on the ethical and philosophical implications of effectively freezing or confiscating old UTXOs. Investors and builders should monitor how proponents respond to pushback from core developers and community voices, and whether practical consensus emerges around the timing and scope of any future activation.

As the conversation evolves, the central question remains: can a planned, staged migration deliver robust quantum protection without compromising Bitcoin’s foundational principles? The answer will shape not just security strategies, but the culture of upgrade, trust, and governance in the years ahead.

This article was originally published as Bitcoiners Propose Freezing Quantum-Vulnerable Coins Under BIP-361 on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

A high-stakes negotiation over stablecoin yields is shaping the path forward for the Senate’s crypto market structure bill, with lawmakers racing to clear a stalemate that has stretched since the House passed the CLARITY Act in July. Senator Thom Tillis signaled he would release a draft agreement this week aimed at resolving a central dispute: whether third parties, including crypto exchanges, should be allowed to pay stablecoin yields to users. The draft’s reception by both banks and the crypto industry will likely determine whether a broader compromise can finally move the legislation toward floor consideration.

The draft has already been circulated to banking and crypto representatives, according to people familiar with the matter cited by Politico. Initial reactions included pushback from the banking side, which worries that full text is needed to gauge the practical consequences of any yield-related prohibitions. Tillis acknowledged that the document is still evolving and stressed that the group is negotiating against a backdrop of concerns about deposit flight tied to yield programs. “Directionally, it has been instructed by what we consider to be the legitimate issues that we have around deposit flight when we’re talking about yield,” Tillis told Politico.

Key takeaways

Sen. Thom Tillis intends to publicly release a draft agreement this week that addresses the Senate’s crypto market structure bill and a contentious ban on third-party stablecoin yield payments.

Banking and crypto groups have expressed concerns about the proposed language, and a full text release is seen as essential for meaningful negotiations.

The talks have been mediated by the White House, with at least three meetings held to bridge gaps between the sectors.

Stablecoin yields remain a practical and revenue-critical component for many crypto platforms, complicating policy choices about how yield payments should be treated under banking and securities laws.

If consensus remains elusive, Tillis says another round of negotiations could occur, potentially marking the fourth government-led mediation effort on the issue.

Draft could unlock a long-standing impasse on yields

The Senate’s crypto market structure bill is designed to outline how the nation’s primary financial regulators—namely the two major federal watchdogs—would oversee the crypto sector. Its chances of advancement depend in part on resolving a central dispute: whether third parties, including exchanges, may offer yield payments on stablecoins or whether such activity should be curtailed or banned altogether. The prospect of a prohibition has been a sticking point since early conversations intensified earlier in the year.

Advocates for a broader, clearer regulatory framework argue that stablecoins — and the incentives around their yields — intersect with traditional banking and savings behavior in ways that could affect deposit stability and consumer protection. Banks and financial incumbents fear yield programs could intensify deposit flight, potentially destabilizing bank balance sheets and prompting risk management concerns. In contrast, crypto industry participants have pushed for clearer guardrails that would allow legitimate yield activities to continue under a predictable regulatory regime, rather than a blanket restriction that could push operations overseas or into a more uncertain gray area.

Tillis’s comments underscore a willingness to adjust the draft as negotiations proceed. He noted progress on anti-evasion provisions but indicated that enforcement language remains a work in progress. With the White House having hosted multiple meetings between the groups, the process has been shaped not only by lawmakers but by executive-branch engagement intended to surface workable compromises rather than political theatrics. The goal, as described by Tillis, is to land on a “mark” — a final set of provisions that both sides can accept and that lawmakers can advance to a vote.

Industry tensions: what’s in play and why it matters

Stablecoin yields are a practical business line for crypto platforms, representing a channel through which users earn returns on their digital dollars. Banks view such yield payments through the lens of traditional financial stability and supervision, arguing that third-party yield offerings can complicate customer behavior around savings, liquidity, and the movement of deposits. The core concern is depositor discipline and the potential for destabilizing flows that could spill over into the broader regulated banking system.

Crypto industry participants counter that clear, enforceable rules are preferable to opaque or ad hoc prohibitions. They argue that a well-defined framework could bring stablecoins and their yield mechanisms under accountability without forcing projects to relocate out of the United States or shutter legitimate financial services. The ongoing dialogue, including White House mediation, reflects a broader policy question: how to balance rapid financial innovation with prudent oversight. The outcome could influence how exchanges and other service providers structure stablecoin programs for the foreseeable future.

The evolving draft has already drawn scrutiny from observers who remind markets that the bill’s trajectory could affect more than the yield debate. A stable regulatory environment that clarifies which actors can provide yield and under what conditions can reduce uncertainty for issuers, users, and institutional participants. Conversely, a restrictive stance may curb experimentation and push some yield initiatives underground, creating potential compliance challenges.

Next steps: where the process goes from here

With Tillis indicating openness to further changes, the immediate question is whether the forthcoming draft will present a sufficiently narrow and precise set of rules to garner bipartisan support. If banking and crypto groups still diverge after a full text becomes public, Tillis said he would consider convening another negotiation session that could bring in additional participants or proposals. He described the process as potentially continuing through a fourth round of government-facilitated talks if needed to finish the “final pieces” and reach a mark that lawmakers can advance.

The momentum depends on how convincingly the draft reconciles two core concerns: protecting the stability of the banking system and enabling legitimate, compliant crypto yield offerings. The White House-mediated meetings signal a heightened emphasis on achieving a balanced outcome that can withstand political scrutiny while delivering a practical regulatory framework for markets. Investors, traders, and builders in the crypto space will be watching closely for the exact language on enforcement, anti-evasion measures, and the precise scope of any ban on third-party yield payments.

Broader implications for policy, markets, and adoption

Beyond the immediate legislative maneuvering, the outcome of the yield provisions could shape the tempo of stablecoin adoption and the maturation of the crypto economy in the United States. A well-structured agreement that provides clarity without stifling innovation could reassure issuers and users that stablecoins will operate under predictable rules. It could also influence how exchanges, custodians, and on/off-ramp providers design their product offerings to align with future compliance expectations. For policymakers, the challenge remains to strike a balance between consumer protection, financial stability, and the competitive advantage that clear rules can offer to domestic innovators.

As the draft is unveiled and debated in the weeks ahead, market participants should monitor not only the yield provisions themselves but also the broader framework for how the bill would allocate regulatory authority between the nation’s principal watchdogs. The ultimate shape of the text will influence not just the economics of stablecoins but the regulatory posture that defines the U.S. stance toward crypto markets in the coming years.

Thus, the key questions for readers and market participants are straightforward: Will the forthcoming draft provide a credible path to de-risk yield programs while preserving financial stability? How decisive will the enforcement language be, and what guardrails will govern anti-evasion measures? And finally, when can market participants expect a final mark that the Senate can move through committee and toward a vote?

Keep watching regulatory filings and official statements for the full draft text and any subsequent revisions. The next few weeks are likely to define whether the United States can strike a middle ground that both protects consumers and supports responsible financial innovation in stablecoins.

This article was originally published as Crypto, Banks Stand Off as Senate Bill Sparks New Proposal Concerns on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

World Liberty Financial’s WLFI token is facing near-term downside pressure as a confluence of technical patterns and on-chain risk indicators unfold in April. A bear-flag setup on WLFI’s four-hour chart points to a potential slide toward roughly $0.066, about 20% lower than current levels, if the pattern plays out. At the same time, on-chain activity highlights liquidity constraints and a looming dilution concern tied to a large token unlock, while allegations from a high-profile adviser about backdoor controls add a governance dimension to the risk matrix.

Key takeaways

Bear-flag interpretation suggests WLFI could drop to around $0.066 in April, a roughly 20% downside from current prices if the pattern completes.

If WLFI breaks above the upper trendline, the bear setup could be invalidated, with upside targets near $0.081–$0.085, aligned with key moving averages.

On-chain data shows wallets tied to WLFI deposited 3–5 billion WLFI as collateral on Dolomite to borrow about $75 million in stablecoins, creating potential liquidity fragility.

More than $40 million of WLFI was moved to Coinbase Prime, driving pool utilization to about 93% and drawing scrutiny over liquidity risk and circular borrowing dynamics.

A proposed unlock of over 16 billion WLFI from still-locked public allocations could dilute existing holders, heightening selling pressure and governance uncertainty.

Tron founder Justin Sun, an adviser to WLFI, publicly accused the project of embedding a hidden backdoor blacklist function in the contract, raising questions about transparency and decentralization.

Bearish setup and price targets

Technical analysis of WLFI’s recent price action highlights a bear-flag formation forming inside a broader downtrend. In market terms, a bear flag is a continuation pattern that often materializes after a sharp decline, with the expectation of further downside once the price breaches the lower trendline accompanied by rising volumes. Applied to WLFI, the measured downside target sits near $0.066 in April, roughly 20% below current levels, signaling a potential continuation of the recent selling pressure.

Conversely, a break above the upper border of the flag could invalidate the setup and shift the near-term outlook to the upside. In that scenario, traders would scrutinize near-term resistance near the 20-day moving average around $0.081 and the 50-day moving average near $0.085. Those levels would act as calibration points for the balance of risk and are consistent with the short- to medium-term moving-average framework that often guides intraday momentum and liquidity expectations for altcoins with thin order books.

Illiquid collateral and liquidity risk

Beyond technicals, on-chain activity paints a picture of liquidity stress that could amplify price moves. Data from Arkham Intelligence shows wallets associated with World Liberty Financial deposited roughly 3–5 billion WLFI tokens as collateral on the Dolomite protocol to borrow around $75 million in stablecoins, including USD1 and USDC. The debt position underscores a classic risk pattern: borrowing against a token that itself has relatively low liquidity can magnify losses if WLFI’s price gaps lower and the value of the collateral falters.

Adding to the liquidity nervosity, more than $40 million of WLFI was subsequently moved to Coinbase Prime, a shift that coincided with a pool-utilization rate approaching 93%. Critics argue that such high utilization constrains withdrawals and increases the likelihood of circular liquidity extraction, where borrowed funds are recycled into the protocol or exchanges, further thinning available liquidity for ordinary holders.

The structure—using wedged, thinly traded internal tokens as collateral to secure real-world liquidity—creates a sensitive dynamic. A sharp price decline could quickly erode the collateral’s value, potentially triggering liquidations and creating a feedback loop that accelerates selling pressure and worsens liquidity crunches for depositors.

In this context, the risk is not merely about near-term sentiment but about structural fragility: if WLFI’s price deteriorates, the illiquid nature of the backing collateral can intensify redemptions and bad-debt risk, complicating rescue scenarios for creditors and investors alike.

Unlocks, dilution, and governance questions

Another central pillar of the WLFI narrative is a looming unlock tied to public allocations that remain locked. Reports indicate a proposed unlock of more than 16 billion WLFI tokens could come to market, introducing dilution risk for current holders. When combined with the on-chain debt and the high pool utilization, investors must consider how additional WLFI supply would interact with a price that is already pressured by the bear-flag setup.

On governance and transparency, the story intersects with broader questions about decentralization and control. Justin Sun, the Tron founder who reportedly invested around $75 million in WLFI and has served as an adviser, has publicly accused the project of embedding a hidden backdoor blacklisting function within the contract. He contends that such a feature would allow unilateral freezing of wallet assets without notice, a claim that goes to the heart of decentralization promises and governance legitimacy.

Sun’s commentary went further, criticizing governance votes as rigged or non-transparent and urging greater clarity around unlock schedules and contract safeguards. While these remarks reflect a single viewpoint, they have fed a narrative of governance risk surrounding WLFI and have kept market participants attentive to updates on smart contract design and governance processes.

What to watch next

The WLFI story is still taking shape. In the near term, traders will likely monitor whether WLFI breaks above key resistance levels or continues to slide within the bear-flag setup. On the liquidity side, watchers will scrutinize the fate of the 3–5 billion WLFI collateral and the trajectory of the 93% pool utilization, as any shift could precipitate volatile liquidations or redemption dynamics. Finally, the unlock calendar and any official clarifications from WLFI’s team or its advisers will be crucial to gauge dilution risk and governance integrity.

For investors and builders, the coming weeks will reveal whether the market breathes life into WLFI’s fundamentals or whether liquidity and control concerns overwhelm expectations. The unfolding intersection of technical pattern, on-chain collateral dynamics, and governance discourse will be the key lens through which WLFI’s potential path forward is judged.

This article was originally published as WLFI may fall 20% on LUNA 2.0-style allegations on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

Bitcoin extended its latest bounce, surging about 5% on Tuesday to a fresh intraday high near $76,120 as traders weigh a renewed bullish setup and stronger on-chain activity. The move rekindles expectations of a broader rally, with market participants eyeing higher targets if momentum persists and key resistance zones are cleared.

Key takeaways

Bitcoin punched to an intraday high around $76,120, reclaiming earlier resistance and signaling renewed upside momentum.

Analysts see a potential breakout above an ascending triangle pattern, with the next major hurdle near $80,000 and a measured target around $89,050.

On-chain activity supports the price move: daily transaction count rose sharply in 2026, reaching 765,130 million as of April 5, a level last seen in November 2024 when BTC briefly topped $100,000.

Network activity is corroborated by higher fee revenue, with total on-chain fees up about 4% week over week to roughly $153,700, suggesting greater willingness to pay for priority processing.

Price action and the chart setup

Trading data shows Bitcoin breaking above the upper boundary of its latest consolidation, with Tuesday’s rally pushing the price above $76,000—levels not seen since early February. Analysts described the move as a breakout that validates renewed bullish momentum, noting that a decisive close above the $75,000 to $76,000 zone would confirm the breakout and widen the path toward higher targets.

“Bitcoin surged above the $76,000 level, breaking above its March highs and signaling renewed bullish momentum,”

Skeptics and optimists alike are watching the same crucial points: a sustained close above the moving averages near $75,000 and a daily close beyond the resistance front near $80,000. If these thresholds are crossed, traders anticipate a continued push toward the measured target implied by the formation—roughly $89,050—which would mark a meaningful shift in the short-term trajectory.

Technical commentary also highlights the pattern at play: Bitcoin appears to be validating an ascending triangle after breaking above the upper trend line around $73,000 earlier in the week. A close above the confluence of the trend line and the 100-day moving average would bolster confidence in a bullish breakout, while a failure to sustain above $75,000 could reintroduce volatility and test lower supports.

As observers map the road ahead, one analyst emphasized that breaking above the pattern and the 100MA would indicate a genuine shift in momentum, potentially accelerating a move toward the $84,000 area and higher. The discussion underscores how chart structure, not just price level, is shaping expectations for the near term.

On-chain activity corroborates the price move

Price strength is aligning with rising on-chain usage. Bitcoin’s daily transaction count has surged in 2026, reaching about 765,130 million as of April 5, according to CryptoQuant data cited in market briefings. This level marks a multi-month high and echoes earlier bursts of network activity that accompanied major price moves.

That activity level was last observed during a period in November 2024 when Bitcoin briefly traded into the six-figure territory, approximating a macro moment when speculative fervor and investor interest peaked. An analyst known on social channels noted that the current transaction count is higher than during some earlier high-price eras, suggesting sustained network engagement rather than a fleeting spike.

The on-chain signal is complemented by commentary from observers who point to the broader implications of rising usage: increased transaction counts can reflect a growing number of market participants, higher merchant adoption, or greater trader activity seeking to execute orders with priority. In this context, the 2026 uptick in activity helps explain why the market is not only chasing higher prices but also experiencing more active on-chain participation.

“The network is showing bull market behavior,”

That sentiment came from a Twitter analyst who highlighted the robust on-chain activity as a meaningful backdrop to price action. While the precise drivers behind the surge remain multifaceted, the association between rising transaction counts and bullish momentum is a recurring theme in recent market cycles.

Fees rise as demand for on-chain priority grows

Beyond transaction counts, Fee activity also rolled higher. Glassnode’s Market Pulse observed that Bitcoin’s total on-chain fee volume increased about 4% over the prior week, reaching roughly $153,700. The uptick in fees is interpreted as heightened willingness among users to pay for priority processing, signaling sustained or expanding network demand even as price moves unfold.

From a market perspective, rising fees can reflect a mix of transaction acceleration by traders attempting to front-run or secure confirmations in a volatile environment, and real-world use cases driving higher activity. While fees alone do not determine price direction, they provide a complementary read on how busy the network is and how users are prioritizing their transactions in this phase of renewed activity.

What this means for traders and investors

The combination of a renewed price breakout, a believable chart pattern, and stronger on-chain signals paints a cohesive picture of renewed appetite among market participants. For traders, the key inflection point remains the daily close above critical resistance—roughly $75,000–$76,000—and confirmation of the ascending triangle’s breakout with a follow-through beyond the next hurdle near $80,000. If these thresholds hold, the measured move toward the mid-to-upper $80,000s—and potentially toward $89,050—becomes more credible.

Investors will also be watching whether the surge in on-chain activity and rising fee volume persists, as it can indicate longer-term engagement rather than a purely speculative sprint. The last time the network showed similar on-chain vigor was during prior price cycles when BTC breached notable price milestones, which adds a layer of historical context to the current setup.

Nevertheless, uncertainties remain. The macro landscape—regulatory developments, policy shifts, and broader market conditions—will always color Bitcoin’s trajectory. A decisive close above resistance levels, followed by sustained momentum, would strengthen the case for a continued advance; a retreat or muted follow-through could prompt a reversion to nearer support around the $75,000 mark.

For readers watching the next chapters, the immediate priority is confirmation: a daily close above the $76,000 zone and a sustained push beyond $80,000 would provide a clearer path toward the higher targets implied by the chart pattern and the improving on-chain backdrop. Until then, the market remains in a wait-and-watch phase, balancing chart psychology with real-time network activity.

This article was originally published as Bitcoin Shows Bullish Chart Pattern, Targeting $90k on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.