C L I P H E R
9.7k Публикации
C L I P H E R
Trader | Market Observer | CONTENT CREATOR |
Открытая сделка
Трейдер с регулярными сделками
1.7 г
236 подписок(и/а)
27.6K+ подписчиков(а)
25.2K+ понравилось
Посты
Портфель
Все
Цитирования
Активно
$ENA Setup
ENA at $0.1748 is approaching a potential momentum trigger.
Break above $0.180 → TP $0.190 / $0.205.
Invalidation below $0.166. I’d rather wait for volume confirmation than front-run the move
.
ENA at $0.1748 is approaching a potential momentum trigger.
Break above $0.180 → TP $0.190 / $0.205.
Invalidation below $0.166. I’d rather wait for volume confirmation than front-run the move
.
$DOGE
Setup
DOGE around $0.09195 is sitting close to the $0.10 psychological target.
Break above $0.094 → TP $0.098 / $0.103.
Invalidation below $0.088. Meme momentum can move fast in both directions.
Setup
DOGE around $0.09195 is sitting close to the $0.10 psychological target.
Break above $0.094 → TP $0.098 / $0.103.
Invalidation below $0.088. Meme momentum can move fast in both directions.
$ZEC Setup
ZEC is showing a higher-risk momentum setup around $815.85.
Break above $830 → TP $880 / $930.
Invalidation below $790. High volatility means position sizing matters here.
ZEC is showing a higher-risk momentum setup around $815.85.
Break above $830 → TP $880 / $930.
Invalidation below $790. High volatility means position sizing matters here.
$BNB Setup
BNB at $692.56 is approaching the $700 psychological zone.
Break above $705 → TP $725 / $750.
Invalidation below $675. The setup becomes interesting only if buyers can reclaim the breakout zone.
BNB at $692.56 is approaching the $700 psychological zone.
Break above $705 → TP $725 / $750.
Invalidation below $675. The setup becomes interesting only if buyers can reclaim the breakout zone.
$XRP Setup
XRP is trading around $1.4869, so the $1.50 area is the first level I’d watch.
Break and hold above $1.52 → TP $1.58 / $1.65.
Invalidation below $1.44. Confirmation first, entry second.
XRP is trading around $1.4869, so the $1.50 area is the first level I’d watch.
Break and hold above $1.52 → TP $1.58 / $1.65.
Invalidation below $1.44. Confirmation first, entry second.
$SOL Setup
SOL at $94.19 is close to the $100 psychological level.
Break above $95.50 → TP $99 / $104.
Invalidation around $91.50. If $95.50 rejects hard, patience is better than forcing a trade.
SOL at $94.19 is close to the $100 psychological level.
Break above $95.50 → TP $99 / $104.
Invalidation around $91.50. If $95.50 rejects hard, patience is better than forcing a trade.
$ETH Setup
ETH is around $2,420, with momentum needing to reclaim the next resistance zone.
Long above $2,440 → TP $2,500 / $2,580.
Stop/invalidation: $2,360. A clean breakout matters more than an early entry.
ETH is around $2,420, with momentum needing to reclaim the next resistance zone.
Long above $2,440 → TP $2,500 / $2,580.
Stop/invalidation: $2,360. A clean breakout matters more than an early entry.
$BTC Setup
BTC at $77,041 is sitting near a key psychological zone.
Breakout above $77,800 → TP $79,000 / $80,500.
Invalidation below $75,900. Wait for confirmation, don’t chase the candle.
BTC at $77,041 is sitting near a key psychological zone.
Breakout above $77,800 → TP $79,000 / $80,500.
Invalidation below $75,900. Wait for confirmation, don’t chase the candle.
$AAVE
Setup
AAVE is one of the more interesting names on the board because the move is strong without being as extreme as some of the smaller gainers.
AAVE — 125.46
Potential pullback entry: 121–124
Stop: 117
TP1: 130
TP2: 136
TP3: 142
If 121 fails decisively, the setup changes.
I’d prefer confirmation around support rather than buying directly into resistance.
Setup
AAVE is one of the more interesting names on the board because the move is strong without being as extreme as some of the smaller gainers.
AAVE — 125.46
Potential pullback entry: 121–124
Stop: 117
TP1: 130
TP2: 136
TP3: 142
If 121 fails decisively, the setup changes.
I’d prefer confirmation around support rather than buying directly into resistance.
$STX Momentum Setup
STX is showing strong momentum after a +22% move.
Instead of chasing:
Entry zone: 0.195–0.202
Invalidation: below 0.188
TP1: 0.215
TP2: 0.230
TP3: 0.245
The key is whether buyers can defend the breakout area on a retest.
Breakout + retest > FOMO entry.
STX is showing strong momentum after a +22% move.
Instead of chasing:
Entry zone: 0.195–0.202
Invalidation: below 0.188
TP1: 0.215
TP2: 0.230
TP3: 0.245
The key is whether buyers can defend the breakout area on a retest.
Breakout + retest > FOMO entry.
$TRUMP
Trade Setup
TRUMP is up sharply on the session, so momentum is obvious — but so is the risk of buying the top.
Setup: wait for a pullback toward 2.35–2.42
Stop: 2.25
TP1: 2.55
TP2: 2.70+
If price keeps running without a retest, I would skip the trade.
A missed trade is cheaper than a bad entry.
Trade Setup
TRUMP is up sharply on the session, so momentum is obvious — but so is the risk of buying the top.
Setup: wait for a pullback toward 2.35–2.42
Stop: 2.25
TP1: 2.55
TP2: 2.70+
If price keeps running without a retest, I would skip the trade.
A missed trade is cheaper than a bad entry.
$GAIN ers Watchlist
The market is showing broad strength today, but chasing a +20–35% candle is usually where risk gets expensive.
SC — 0.000718
Entry: 0.00070–0.00072
Stop: 0.00067
TP1: 0.00076
TP2: 0.00082
I’d rather wait for a pullback and confirmation than enter after the vertical move.
Risk small. Protect capital first.
The market is showing broad strength today, but chasing a +20–35% candle is usually where risk gets expensive.
SC — 0.000718
Entry: 0.00070–0.00072
Stop: 0.00067
TP1: 0.00076
TP2: 0.00082
I’d rather wait for a pullback and confirmation than enter after the vertical move.
Risk small. Protect capital first.
@TermMax caught my attention today because the more I looked at the numbers, the more the TVL headline seemed less important than what was happening underneath it.
@TermMax is built around fixed-rate borrowing, lending, and options, so I wanted to look at how much of the deposited liquidity is actually being put to work. The protocol reports more than $50M in TVL, while DefiLlama shows roughly $32M, with active loans around $22M. On DefiLlama’s numbers, that means active loans are close to 69% of TVL.
That ratio is interesting. For a protocol like @TermMax liquidity only becomes meaningful when it can support actual fixed-term borrowing and structured positions. A high loan-to-TVL ratio can therefore tell us more about capital efficiency than TVL alone.
What I find more interesting, though, is the gap between the reported figures. It raises a simple question: are different sources measuring different forms of liquidity, or is there capital being counted differently across the protocol?
Has anyone looked into the reason behind this discrepancy? I’d be curious to see what the underlying data says.
#termmax @TermMax
$ZORA
$HEMI
$ENA
@TermMax is built around fixed-rate borrowing, lending, and options, so I wanted to look at how much of the deposited liquidity is actually being put to work. The protocol reports more than $50M in TVL, while DefiLlama shows roughly $32M, with active loans around $22M. On DefiLlama’s numbers, that means active loans are close to 69% of TVL.
That ratio is interesting. For a protocol like @TermMax liquidity only becomes meaningful when it can support actual fixed-term borrowing and structured positions. A high loan-to-TVL ratio can therefore tell us more about capital efficiency than TVL alone.
What I find more interesting, though, is the gap between the reported figures. It raises a simple question: are different sources measuring different forms of liquidity, or is there capital being counted differently across the protocol?
Has anyone looked into the reason behind this discrepancy? I’d be curious to see what the underlying data says.
#termmax @TermMax
$ZORA
$HEMI
$ENA
Войдите, чтобы посмотреть больше материала