Where does a network token get its demand? Kite's tokenomics start with a small commission on AI service transactions.
As the Foundation describes it, the protocol takes a commission from each AI service payment, can swap that revenue into KITE on the open market, and passes it to the module and the Kite L1. Service operators still get paid in the currency they prefer. Modules that issue their own tokens face a second rule: they must lock KITE into liquidity pools paired with those tokens, the requirement scales with size and usage, and the position cannot be withdrawn while the module stays active.
Bull case: usage creates revenue, revenue creates buying, and every successful module locks up more supply.
Bear case: it only works if agents pay for services at real volume, and a commission set too high drives providers elsewhere while one set too low funds nothing.
Not financial advice, just mechanics. Where would you set the commission, and why?
#KiteBBW $KITE
As the Foundation describes it, the protocol takes a commission from each AI service payment, can swap that revenue into KITE on the open market, and passes it to the module and the Kite L1. Service operators still get paid in the currency they prefer. Modules that issue their own tokens face a second rule: they must lock KITE into liquidity pools paired with those tokens, the requirement scales with size and usage, and the position cannot be withdrawn while the module stays active.
Bull case: usage creates revenue, revenue creates buying, and every successful module locks up more supply.
Bear case: it only works if agents pay for services at real volume, and a commission set too high drives providers elsewhere while one set too low funds nothing.
Not financial advice, just mechanics. Where would you set the commission, and why?
#KiteBBW $KITE