everyone thinks buying tokens with aggressive burn mechanics makes them bulletproof, but actually most degens are walking straight into a trap.

watching your portfolio bleed out while waiting for a protocol upgrade to save your bags is pure pain, especially when you FOMO’d at the local top thinking buybacks equal guaranteed upward price discovery.

take a look at how markets react every time regulatory clarity hits the tape. the recent sec stance clarifying that buybacks and routine technical upgrades don’t inherently make a token a security should be a massive tailwind for legit builders. we saw projects like $NEAR and $ORDI get heavily debated over structural utility, yet traders kept dumping because they confused tokenomics with true market demand.

ngl ser, fundamental mechanics only matter if people actually use the network. a buyback program on zero organic revenue is just slow-motion dilution, and holding bags purely because devs promised code changes won't fix bad risk management.

are you still bidding tokens based purely on burn mechanisms, or has your strategy shifted to real fee generation?

#SECSaysBuybacksUpgradesDontMakeTokenSecurity #BitwiseFilesToListNEARETFOnNYSEArca #SECCommissionerPeirceToLeaveOct2