0xkydo

În afară de zkSync, nu cred că cineva a făcut progrese semnificative în construirea unei stive complete de confidențialitate.

The checks and balances in L1s are beautiful.

Stakers: Congressional - Control financial resources

Operators: Judicial - decides what is the network by picking version of the node software

Network Developers: Executive - Implement the changes to node software

If Hyperliquid has shown anything is that product obsession outweighs narrative in trading.

Why? Because your target customers are sophisticated traders who can smell bullshit from miles away.

The next new exchange won’t be built on retardio narrative but on real product differentiations.

At CRCL’s P/S ratio, Hyperliquid would be trading at ______

At CRCL’s P/S ratio, Ethereum would be trading at ______

At CRCL’s P/S ratio, Solana would be trading at ______

had an interesting chat with my legal friends about "credible neutrality"

here's the twist: "being maximal censorship-resistant and credibly neutral" might be the least neutral stance

why?

by prioritizing censorship resistance, you're taking a strong political stance valuing individual sovereignty over shared morality

consider this: imagine irrefutable evidence of some address's owner committing horrible acts like child trafficking

do you ban their address or not?

not censoring at the base layer is an extreme position in the tradeoff between individual rights and collective ethics

some might argue it leans towards moral relativism - by not banning them, it is suggesting no absolute right or wrong exist

i'm not entirely sold on this view, but it offers an intriguing perspective on credible neutrality

thoughts?

cine are cea mai bună platformă de date pentru analiza detaliată L2?

caut
- structura costurilor tranzacțiilor (împărțirea bază/prioritate) în timp și perioade
- volatilitatea comisioanelor
- comision mediu/medie pe tip de tranzacție (schimburi/transferuri)

50MB/s s-ar putea să nu pară mult la prima vedere
dar când îl scalezi, este uluitor

pentru 1 an, asta înseamnă 1.576.800.000.000 mb de date, suficient pentru a susține
- 1,3 trilioane de schimburi uniswap
- 7,8 trilioane de transferuri erc20

pentru context, visa a procesat doar 0,233 trilioane de tranzacții în 2024

transformarea fondatorilor consumatori în crypto cu acest truc simplu

reading the whitepapers for swarm-style / decentralized ai training protocols this week and i’m stunned by what isn’t in them: determinism.

gpu inference is famously flaky - tiny fp32 reorderings, atomics in convolutions, tensor-core down-casts, multi-stream races - all add up to different logits on the “same” forward pass. the literature is full of workarounds (cuDNN deterministic modes, ticket-lock kernels, frozen engine builds), yet none of that shows up in the glossy dtrain papers.

why care? if every peer in a mesh spits out slightly different gradients, good luck reaching onchain consensus or proving an honest contribution. verification costs explode, slashing logic breaks, and the whole “trust-minimized training” slogan starts to feel like an ideal than implementation.

so, crypto-ml twitter: who’s actually tackling non-determinism in a distributed, adversarial setting? any papers / blogs i should read? analogies to other consensus layers? drop links below

Tocmai am aflat că EigenDA este singurul furnizor alt-da care suportă atât USDC cât și USDT, mulțumiri lui @celo

Acum este clar, stratul DA contează pentru instituții și EigenDA este pregătit pentru adoptarea plăților în lumea reală!

just spent an awesome day at stanford

half the time was giving a lecture on intersubjectivity, the other half meeting folks buzzing about crypto

shoutout to @0xfishylosopher for building a solid undergrad crypto scene and competing with ai

everyone's pumped, curious, and full of passion

feeling super optimistic about stanford crypto's future!

i think your feelings on this sentence reveal a lot

if you're disgusted, you likely view crypto as a political tool first, tech second

but if you're grateful for stopping the hack, you see it as a tech tool first, political tool second or not at all

NYC este capitala criptomonedelor

simțindu-mă optimist în legătură cu crypto astăzi

- legislația privind stablecoin-urile a fost aprobată în senat
- echipa de lucru a SEC face o treabă excelentă
- solana anunță un nou protocol de consens
- coinbase luptă pentru a împiedica circle să scape de ripple

zi bună

Crypto needs to rely less on carbon-based intelligence and more on silicon-based intelligence

Less multisigs, more AI

Dream bigger

Crypto needs to rely less on carbon-based intelligence and more on silicon-based intelligence

Less multisigs, more AI

as xrp gets its etf approval, the prestige of having a crypto etf is mostly gone

this is net negative for ethereum and hugely positive for bitcoin

the first crypto etf and the rest of them