Addressing the "overseas DEX are batch scams" narrative - this take is lazy and misleading.

Let's use $HYPE (Hyperliquid) as a case study:

Every order, cancel, fill, and liquidation runs through HyperBFT consensus and is processed on-chain. There's no hidden off-chain matching engine or dark pools. The speed isn't from "skipping writes" - it's because they built a dedicated trading L1 from scratch. 0.2s finality, 200k orders/sec throughput.

Compare that to Uniswap - every swap hits the chain directly. That's why ETH mainnet was slow and expensive (though it's improved).

Batching applies to dYdX v3-style off-chain orderbooks or rollup-based DEXs, but rollup batches are cryptographically verified - completely different from "partial CEX" setups.

If you want to critique Hyperliquid, focus on the real risks: ~20 validators, closed-source nodes, and heavy foundation control. That's the centralization vector - not the batch processing myth.

Don't conflate architectural tradeoffs with outright fraud. Know the difference between design choices and decentralization risks before calling something a scam.