BullionOX

W momencie, gdy zacząłem odkrywać nowe blockchainy i dążyłem do połączenia AI z Web3 w sensie innym niż tylko narzędzie, Vanar Chain okazał się być celowo zbudowany i zorganizowany. Zamiast umieszczać AI na istniejącej infrastrukturze, włącza inteligentne funkcje w swoją strukturę. To sprawia, że jest to platforma aplikacyjna nowej generacji, gdzie potrzebna jest inteligencja w danych, szybkie myślenie i rozsądne podejście do skali.
Vanar Chain to blockchain o otwartym źródle (modularna warstwa 1), który jest w pełni zgodny z EVM. Stanowi podstawę stosu natywnego AI specyficznego dla płatności, tokenizowanych aktywów i obciążenia agenta AI. Pierwsza warstwa oferuje wysoką przepustowość i niską stałą opłatę, co czyni ją odpowiednią do transakcji o wysokiej częstotliwości, gdzie koszt nie jest zmienny. To pomaga programistom tworzyć dApps, które mogą być konsekwentnie i niezawodnie wykorzystywane w rzeczywistości.

The first time I looked at Walrus Protocol through the prism of end to end data management, I noticed that it is a serious project that aims to offer end to end storage that would consider the entire lifecycle of storage, including upload and long term accessibility, without using intermediaries. Most of the work of the decentralized storage systems only address a fraction of this problem, whereas Walrus combines effective encoding, verifiable proofs, programmable control, and economic incentives into a single system on Sui.
Walrus uses the RedStuff algorithm as a client side two-dimensional erasure coder to start with. Blobs are sliced into pieces, which are dispersed on autonomous storage nodes. This provides resilience with replication factor of 4x to 5x such that even when a substantial number of nodes fail, it can be rebuilt. It is rapid and nearby to the customer, and it does not use network congestion when uploading.
Upon being distributed, the network will mint a Proof of Availability certificate using Sui. This on-chain object establishes the integrity of end-to-end storage and retrieval of the blob is verifiable. This certificate can be referred to by users and smart contracts without the need to access the entire data.
The Move language, offered by Sui, offers a programmable ownership and management. The blob is converted into a Sui object which can be owned, transferred, lengthened or deleted. This facilitates end to end control: developers are able to create dApps where data can be uploaded, can be referenced on chain, and can be updated using contract logic and can be kept indefinitely should the need arise.
In $WAL , storage charges are paid as a lump sum over a certain duration. These charges allocate across epochs to nodes according to performance verified, and as such remain available. The stakeholders in nodes are required to stake WAL to participate with delegation allowing more stakeholders to participate and rewards being given to reliable operators.
The asynchronous challenge protocol ensures that there is correctness during the lifecycle. Nodes randomly acquire sliver ownership and failure is rewarded by cutting off or a reduction. This subjugates the network to long term service, fulfilling the end to end guarantee.
Seal integration introduces privacy, which enables encrypted blobs with access policies on-chain. Nautilus offers offchain computation based on data stored, making it possible to run workflows such as verifiable processing or indexing without revealing contents.
I think this is a strong point of Walrus as it is a complete approach. Integrating effective distribution, on chain verifiability, programmable lifecycle control and usage incentives, it develops a storage layer that can provide complete data ownership and utility in Web3 apps.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus

Fundacja Poufnej Zgodności
Gdy badałem, jak Dusk Network łączy prywatność z regulacjami, jego modułowa architektura wyróżniała się jako celowy projekt dostosowany do potrzeb instytucjonalnych. Założona w 2018 roku, Dusk to blockchain warstwy 1 skoncentrowany na regulowanej infrastrukturze finansowej, wykorzystujący dowody zerowej wiedzy do umożliwienia poufnych transakcji, które pozostają audytowalne. Ta integracja zapewnia, że dane pozostają prywatne, jednocześnie udowadniając zgodność, odpowiadając na zapotrzebowanie tradfi na weryfikowalne działania bez ujawniania.

The first thing that I noticed when I first began to investigate how Plasma handles the concept of making payments using a stablecoin is that they are strategic in their approach of providing frictionless transfers of USDT. It is a case of something that looks easy on a piece of paper and yet very difficult when executed well practically and I have been explaining this to friends based on what I think it does according to the official documentation and network behavior.
On September 25, 2025, plasma released the mainnet beta. The chain is designed to be stablecoin centered with the main asset being USDT (USDT). In contrast to general-purpose networks, which have the advantage of having stablecoins among numerous tokens, in Plasma, all layers are built to ensure that the USDT flow is as fluid as possible, i.e. consensus, execution, and economic model.
It is based on the protocol-level paymaster system. In the case of simple transactions involving sending and receiving of USDT, the protocol would cover the gas expenses up to the latter. The users will not pay anything; they will not require having $XPL or any native token to execute a transfer. This eliminates one of the largest frictions of onchain payment: having to purchase and manage gas token prior to transmitting money. To ensure the feature is available to be used on a daily basis, the paymaster includes rate limits and eligibility policies to curb abuse.
This free mechanism is successful since Plasma applies to PlasmaBFT consensus, a Byzantine fault-tolerant PlasmaBFT protocol built on Fast HotStuff. It achieves sub second block times and deterministic finality thus transfers are confirmed near-immediately. The network can support over 1,000 transactions per second, and it is enough to handle high-frequency payment processes such as remittances, merchant settlements, or payroll disbursements without overloading the network.
The implementation platform is a customized Reth client in Rust. This preserves the entire compatibility of EVM, i.e. developers do not need to rewrite code to deploy existing Ethereum smart contracts. However, the performance is optimized to flows of stablecoins-state transitions and receipt generation are fast and predictable, and users get almost instant confirmation even in periods of high traffic.
Extremely complex interactions are brought into the frictionless experience with custom gas tokens. In their dApps, developers can whitelist USDT or other stablecoins to pay fees. It implies that invoicing, batch payments or merchant gateway applications may allow users to remain fully within stablecoins without compelling them to purchase $XPL .
To process these payments, validators stake $XPL in the Proof-of-Stake system to ensure that the network is secured. Controlled inflation (5% and reducing to 3%), and non-sponsor transaction fees, are the reward sources. It forms a self-sustaining economic cycle: each time the number of USDT users increases, the number of validators increases, and the network is fixed even more.#
Since it was released, Plasma has gained billions of stablecoin liquidity and displayed high usage in integrated DeFi protocols. It is feasible to use in real-world financial flows not only crypto-native trading, but also due to zero-fee basics, fast finality, and EVM tooling.
The decision to become more frictionless and base on USDT payments rather than general-purpose characteristics makes Plasma distinctly superior in the stablecoin industry. It covers the very pain points the gas price, the slow confirmations, the necessity of native tokens, etc. without which digital dollars cannot be widely adopted.
This is the focus that, in my opinion, makes the chain purpose-built to the future of global payments. Plasma Plasma has a design philosophy which is worth reading, should you be tracking the development of stablecoins as everyday money.
To have technical specifics about the paymaster, consensus and performance statistics, official materials of the official resources of the organization @Plasma are understandable and properly structured.
$XPL #Plasma

Fakt, że Vanar Chain jest stosunkowo cichy w kwestii swoich śmiałych wizji i historii marketingowych, kiedy to po raz pierwszy to przeczytałem, sprawił, że obecność tych wizji i historii w tak wielu blockchainach skoncentrowanych na AI wydawała się celowym kontrastem. Vanar Chain zamiast tego wybierałby filar, który jest stabilny w teraźniejszości, zamiast komponentu przyszłej mody, który oferuje AI. Ta praktyka jest informowana przez to, że jest zaprojektowana jako modułowy blockchain Layer 1, który jest specjalnie rozwijany w celu wspierania rzeczywistych obciążeń AI.

Pierwsza natychmiastowa reakcja, jaką miałem, gdy się z tym zetknąłem,
była przemyślaną decyzją projektową, która oparła bezpieczeństwo na Bitcoinie zamiast wyłącznie na jego wewnętrznej zgodności. To nie jest tylko technikalność, ale ma bezpośredni cel w wspieraniu tego, czym jest Plasma, a mianowicie byciem naprawdę neutralnym w miejscu, w którym większość łańcuchów staje w obliczu niebezpieczeństwa centralizacji lub zewnętrznych wpływów. Jako blockchain warstwy 1, który został opracowany w celu wsparcia infrastruktury stablecoin, Plasma wykorzystuje niezrównaną decentralizację Bitcoina, aby opracować warstwę rozliczeniową, która jest tak bezstronna i odporna na cenzurę, jak to możliwe. Teraz możemy rozważyć mechanizm tego bezpieczeństwa opartego na Bitcoinie i powody, dla których Plasma uzasadnienie twierdzi, że jest neutralna.

Aspekt, na którym szczególnie mi zależało, gdy początkowo zaangażowałem się w warstwowy projekt Dusk Network, to DuskDS jako podstawa szybkości wykonania i solidnego rozliczenia, które oferuje DuskDS. Szybkie przetwarzanie jest niezbędne w finansach blockchainowych, a zaufanie instytucjonalne nie może sobie pozwolić na kompromis w zakresie stabilnych rozliczeń. DuskDS może to zrobić, przechowując konsensus i dostępność danych oraz łącząc je z warstwami wykonawczymi, takimi jak DuskEVM i DuskVM. Rdzeniem tego projektu jest protokół Rusk, który zapewnia funkcjonalność przejścia stanu, równoważąc warstwy.

I thought the supply structure and incentive structure of Walrus Protocol were interesting when I initially read the token economics. Walrus has a long term goal of having a sustainable model that will facilitate long term network building as opposed to a short term speculative system. The overall supply of tokens in the will be limited to 1 billion, and the breakdown of such allocation will clearly satisfy the needs of the ecosystem development, community rewards, and operational requirements.
The supply is subdivided into a number of categories. About a third of it is spent on the development of ecosystems and grants, such as builders grants, hackathons, and integrations. The other 20 percent is assigned to first movers and the team which is vested over a long term to align interests with network achievement. Liquidity and community provisions refers to approximately 25% and there is enough tokens to be delegated to get the rewards of the market and to provide market liquidity. The rest is the staking rewards, storage subsidies and future inflation control.
The entire storage economy has a utility token, which is denoted by WAL. In WAL, users pay ahead, and the charges are fixed over the period of selection at this point and allocated uniformly among the epochs to storage nodes. This pay as you drive model of time ensures predictable revenues to nodes and offer assurance of costs to users.
Nodes purchase WAL to be members of storage committees. They have proportions of shares of work and rewards based on the staked amount. Increased stake enables nodes to support additional slivers, which is delegated by the owners of in order to receive a fraction of fees without management of infrastructure.
One of the incentive layers is delegation. Holders privatize the storage rewards of each storage operator, sharing their rewards based on ownership. This gives nodes a motivational reason to be performing well as stable uptime and challenge responses result in more delegation and increased income.
Punishments make people stick to it. The nodes with low performance get less epoch rewards. Failure to satisfy serious conditions causes cutting down of staked WAL and part of it is burned to lower supply or repurposed to those who have been provided with it. This architecture is discouraging of short term behavior and guarding of network integrity.
Reward distribution Epoch based reward distribution links incentives to actual utilization. The larger the number of blobs stored, the greater the amount of the fee pool, which will result in more rewards and thus more nodes will be attracted. This forms a vicious circle as expansion is financed by expansion in the network.
According to me, the token economics used by Walrus is unique in that it is utility based and utility aligned. The model enables a stable, decentralized storage layer in the long term by capping supply, rewarding in real time based on actual storage demand, and penalizing to maintain reliability.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus

As I was beginning to research how blockchains could give privacy without raising eyebrows, the concept of Dusk Network was close to me putting privacy as a verifiable accountability, rather than concealment. Finance Obscurity can be a potential source of regulation concern, yet Dusk, with help of the Rusk protocol, makes privacy a means of demonstrated responsibility, so that actions are verifiable without necessarily being visible.

This is based on the state transitioning capability of Rusk, the state transition of Dusk. It executes transactions and contracts in a deterministic fashion, which is, logic always executes in the same way, and zero-knowledge proofs can be used to ensure that it is correct but the details are secret. To institutions, this implies that establishing a trade or compliance check was carried out correctly, even though the balances and identities remain unknown, and this makes privacy a transparency of accountability.

Rusk justifies it by working with confidential smart contracts, in which the state remains concealed but results are verifiable. This verifiable accountability is central in a controlled environment: auditors receive evidence that there was compliance with rules, yet sensitive data remains secure and that does not fall into the trap of complete obscurity that may conceal malpractice or mistakes.

The design of the protocol focuses on long term utility Rusk is also optimized to run efficient ZK circuits, where verifiability is useful in the continued operation of financial entities such as asset tokenization. It is in line with the vision that Dusk has on compliant infrastructure where privacy will improve accountability rather than avoiding it.

The economic layer is the $DUSK token, which allows Rusk operations in the form of gas to prove and staking in order to guarantee security, which also enforces responsible participation.

In my opinion, Rusk makes the privacy model of Dusk a strength of institutions, a source of trust due to the verifiability in Web3 compliance trends.

What is the effect of verifiable privacy on accountability in your projects?
What is one of the dangers of obscurity in finance?
@Dusk $DUSK #dusk

Chociaż początkowo postrzegałem
jako uproszczony sposób nauki o projektach opartych na Sui w 2025 roku, uznałem to za skuteczny sposób na dążenie do rzeczywistej własności danych w Web3. Przechowywanie danych w sposób centralny, taki jak AWS, zapewnia wygodę, ale nie daje rzeczywistej kontroli nad manipulowaniem danymi, ich usuwaniem, a nawet sprzedażą dostawcy. Walrus reorganizuje to, przekształcając dane w weryfikowalny i programowalny zasób, który mogą posiadać w łańcuchu, a którego użytkownicy mają kontrolę nad swoimi plikami w sposób wolny od pośredników.