Binance Square

CryptoTale News

image
Zweryfikowany twórca
Crypto News outlet | Sharing market trends, regulatory updates, and all significant events. #Unbiased opinions. #Up-to-date information. #Reliable source.
0 Obserwowani
25.8K+ Obserwujący
3.3K+ Polubione
476 Udostępnione
Treść
·
--
South Korea Weighs Bank-Led Won Stablecoins Amid Risk DebateSouth Korea considers bank-led won stablecoins as regulators weigh capital flow risks. Governor Lee warns stablecoins may bypass controls through volatile USD-linked tokens. Central bank favors tokenized deposits and wholesale CBDCs over digital currency rollout. South Korea is weighing whether to allow domestic institutions to issue virtual asset stablecoins as regulatory debate intensifies. The discussion took center stage at the Asian Financial Forum in Hong Kong on January 26. Bank of Korea Governor Lee Chang-yong outlined the central bank’s cautious position during a public session. He said authorities now face growing market pressure to modernize the country’s digital asset framework. As a result, regulators already allow South Korean residents to invest in virtual assets issued overseas. At the same time, financial authorities are studying a registration system for domestic virtual asset issuance. The proposal includes potential approval for Korean institutions to issue won-denominated stablecoins. However, Lee stressed that the issue remains controversial within policy circles. He warned that stablecoins raise risks linked to capital flows and financial supervision. Cross-Border Use Raises Capital Flow Concerns Lee said the most likely use case for a Korean won stablecoin involves cross-border transactions. In contrast, he expects tokenized bank deposits to serve domestic payment needs. South Korea already operates a fast and efficient payment infrastructure. That reality reduces the immediate benefit of retail central bank digital currencies. Lee explained that capital flow management still plays a central role in Korea’s financial policy. He warned that won stablecoins could weaken those controls if poorly designed. The risk increases when stablecoins interact with widely available U.S. dollar stablecoins. Lee said exchange rate movements could quickly drive funds into dollar-pegged tokens. Such shifts could trigger large and rapid capital transfers. He added that transaction costs for USD stablecoins remain far lower than traditional dollar settlements. That cost advantage makes sudden capital movement more likely during market volatility. Lee said regulators must account for these risks before approving any issuance framework. He also highlighted oversight challenges tied to stablecoin issuers. Many major USD stablecoins operate outside the banking sector. That structure complicates supervision, compliance, and enforcement efforts. Related: Seized Bitcoin Vanishes as South Korea Expands Crypto Control Bank-Led Model Under Review During the forum, Lee emphasized the need for a conservative rollout strategy. He said authorities prefer a bank-led model for any won stablecoin issuance. According to him, bank involvement ensures stronger KYC and AML enforcement. He noted that stablecoin usage in parts of Asia often aims to obscure identities. Without banks, he said regulators may struggle to enforce compliance standards. “So we want to take a more conservative approach,” Lee told forum attendees. He said officials want to allow won stablecoins but start with bank-based institutions. However, Lee acknowledged resistance from the market. He said industry participants argue non-bank issuers should also participate. That disagreement remains unresolved within the regulatory process. Meanwhile, the central bank continues advancing digital currency pilots. These include tokenized deposits and wholesale central bank digital currencies. Lee said these efforts aim to preserve South Korea’s two-tier financial system. Wholesale CBDCs support interbank settlement without disrupting retail banking. Tokenized deposits allow innovation while keeping funds within regulated banks. Lee said these tools address many use cases linked to stablecoins. They also limit risks tied to retail capital flight. South Korea’s regulators have not announced a timeline for final decisions. The registration framework remains under study by financial authorities. Lee said officials will continue assessing market demand and systemic risks. He added that any approval would prioritize stability over speed. For now, the won stablecoin debate remains open. Regulators continue to weigh market demand against capital flow risks. Any future issuance will likely come with strict oversight and limited scope. The post South Korea Weighs Bank-Led Won Stablecoins Amid Risk Debate appeared first on Cryptotale. The post South Korea Weighs Bank-Led Won Stablecoins Amid Risk Debate appeared first on Cryptotale.

South Korea Weighs Bank-Led Won Stablecoins Amid Risk Debate

South Korea considers bank-led won stablecoins as regulators weigh capital flow risks.

Governor Lee warns stablecoins may bypass controls through volatile USD-linked tokens.

Central bank favors tokenized deposits and wholesale CBDCs over digital currency rollout.

South Korea is weighing whether to allow domestic institutions to issue virtual asset stablecoins as regulatory debate intensifies. The discussion took center stage at the Asian Financial Forum in Hong Kong on January 26.

Bank of Korea Governor Lee Chang-yong outlined the central bank’s cautious position during a public session. He said authorities now face growing market pressure to modernize the country’s digital asset framework.

As a result, regulators already allow South Korean residents to invest in virtual assets issued overseas. At the same time, financial authorities are studying a registration system for domestic virtual asset issuance.

The proposal includes potential approval for Korean institutions to issue won-denominated stablecoins. However, Lee stressed that the issue remains controversial within policy circles. He warned that stablecoins raise risks linked to capital flows and financial supervision.

Cross-Border Use Raises Capital Flow Concerns

Lee said the most likely use case for a Korean won stablecoin involves cross-border transactions. In contrast, he expects tokenized bank deposits to serve domestic payment needs. South Korea already operates a fast and efficient payment infrastructure. That reality reduces the immediate benefit of retail central bank digital currencies.

Lee explained that capital flow management still plays a central role in Korea’s financial policy. He warned that won stablecoins could weaken those controls if poorly designed. The risk increases when stablecoins interact with widely available U.S. dollar stablecoins.

Lee said exchange rate movements could quickly drive funds into dollar-pegged tokens. Such shifts could trigger large and rapid capital transfers. He added that transaction costs for USD stablecoins remain far lower than traditional dollar settlements.

That cost advantage makes sudden capital movement more likely during market volatility. Lee said regulators must account for these risks before approving any issuance framework. He also highlighted oversight challenges tied to stablecoin issuers. Many major USD stablecoins operate outside the banking sector. That structure complicates supervision, compliance, and enforcement efforts.

Related: Seized Bitcoin Vanishes as South Korea Expands Crypto Control

Bank-Led Model Under Review

During the forum, Lee emphasized the need for a conservative rollout strategy. He said authorities prefer a bank-led model for any won stablecoin issuance. According to him, bank involvement ensures stronger KYC and AML enforcement.

He noted that stablecoin usage in parts of Asia often aims to obscure identities. Without banks, he said regulators may struggle to enforce compliance standards. “So we want to take a more conservative approach,” Lee told forum attendees. He said officials want to allow won stablecoins but start with bank-based institutions.

However, Lee acknowledged resistance from the market. He said industry participants argue non-bank issuers should also participate. That disagreement remains unresolved within the regulatory process.

Meanwhile, the central bank continues advancing digital currency pilots. These include tokenized deposits and wholesale central bank digital currencies. Lee said these efforts aim to preserve South Korea’s two-tier financial system.

Wholesale CBDCs support interbank settlement without disrupting retail banking. Tokenized deposits allow innovation while keeping funds within regulated banks. Lee said these tools address many use cases linked to stablecoins. They also limit risks tied to retail capital flight.

South Korea’s regulators have not announced a timeline for final decisions. The registration framework remains under study by financial authorities. Lee said officials will continue assessing market demand and systemic risks. He added that any approval would prioritize stability over speed.

For now, the won stablecoin debate remains open. Regulators continue to weigh market demand against capital flow risks. Any future issuance will likely come with strict oversight and limited scope.

The post South Korea Weighs Bank-Led Won Stablecoins Amid Risk Debate appeared first on Cryptotale.

The post South Korea Weighs Bank-Led Won Stablecoins Amid Risk Debate appeared first on Cryptotale.
Russia Bans WhiteBIT Over Alleged Ukraine Military FundingRussia has labelled WhiteBIT undesirable and warned citizens against any contact. WhiteBIT confirmed about eleven million dollars in donations to Ukrainian causes since. The exchange exited Russia in 2022 and reports growth across global markets today. Russia has banned the Ukrainian-founded crypto exchange WhiteBIT, labelling it an undesirable organization and criminalizing any interaction with the platform inside the country. The decision targets the exchange and its parent firm, W Group, over alleged support for Ukraine’s war effort. Russian prosecutors said the exchange backed Ukraine’s military through funding and technical infrastructure since February 2022.  Authorities warned that Russian citizens now face criminal charges for any dealings with WhiteBIT. The designation marks another step in Russia’s broader crackdown on firms accused of aiding Ukraine. It also reinforces the sharp divide between Russia’s regulatory stance and Ukraine-aligned crypto initiatives. Russia Targets WhiteBIT Over Ukraine Support The Russian prosecutor general accused WhiteBIT of actively supporting Ukraine’s Armed Forces from the first days of the conflict. Officials cited collaboration with Kyiv-linked institutions and fundraising initiatives. Prosecutors said WhiteBIT management donated about $11 million in 2022. Of that amount, roughly $900,000 funded drone systems for Ukraine’s military, according to the statement. The office also claimed that company leaders joined international charity auctions. It said proceeds from those events financed drones for Ukrainian fighters, including members of the Azov unit, which Russia classifies as a terrorist organization. Exchange Response and Market Exit WhiteBIT confirmed the donation figures in a statement shared. The company said the ban strengthens its commitment to supporting Ukraine. The exchange said it exited the Russian market in early 2022, soon after the invasion began. It blocked all Russian and Belarusian users and removed ruble trading pairs at that time. WhiteBIT said those measures cut about 30% of its user base. Despite the loss, the company reported eightfold growth and said it now serves more than eight million users while expanding into the United States. Related: Russia Orders Banks to Report Client Crypto Transactions Broader Crypto Sanctions Context One year into the war, Ukraine’s Ministry of Digital Transformation urged major exchanges to block Russian users. Letters went to platforms including Coinbase, Binance, Bybit, and WhiteBIT. At the time, some exchanges declined a blanket ban. Coinbase and Kraken said they would act only when laws required enforcement while blocking sanctioned entities. Against that backdrop, Russian prosecutors accused WhiteBIT of building gray schemes to move funds abroad. The designation now extends to W Group and related entities over alleged illegal transfers. Donations and Legal Fallout WhiteBIT said it donated about $11 million of its own funds to Ukraine’s defence forces and humanitarian causes. Through its payment arm Whitepay, the exchange said it facilitated more than $160 million in crypto donations. The company said these funds supported both civilian aid and defence-related fundraising. It described the actions as part of its civic position as a Ukrainian-rooted business during wartime. For these efforts, WhiteBIT and founder Volodymyr Nosov received honours from Ukraine’s government and security services. Russia said the ban will have legal consequences for its citizens. WhiteBIT said the impact on operations will remain limited due to its earlier market exit and full blockade of Russian-linked users. The post Russia Bans WhiteBIT Over Alleged Ukraine Military Funding appeared first on Cryptotale. The post Russia Bans WhiteBIT Over Alleged Ukraine Military Funding appeared first on Cryptotale.

Russia Bans WhiteBIT Over Alleged Ukraine Military Funding

Russia has labelled WhiteBIT undesirable and warned citizens against any contact.

WhiteBIT confirmed about eleven million dollars in donations to Ukrainian causes since.

The exchange exited Russia in 2022 and reports growth across global markets today.

Russia has banned the Ukrainian-founded crypto exchange WhiteBIT, labelling it an undesirable organization and criminalizing any interaction with the platform inside the country. The decision targets the exchange and its parent firm, W Group, over alleged support for Ukraine’s war effort. Russian prosecutors said the exchange backed Ukraine’s military through funding and technical infrastructure since February 2022. 

Authorities warned that Russian citizens now face criminal charges for any dealings with WhiteBIT. The designation marks another step in Russia’s broader crackdown on firms accused of aiding Ukraine. It also reinforces the sharp divide between Russia’s regulatory stance and Ukraine-aligned crypto initiatives.

Russia Targets WhiteBIT Over Ukraine Support

The Russian prosecutor general accused WhiteBIT of actively supporting Ukraine’s Armed Forces from the first days of the conflict. Officials cited collaboration with Kyiv-linked institutions and fundraising initiatives.

Prosecutors said WhiteBIT management donated about $11 million in 2022. Of that amount, roughly $900,000 funded drone systems for Ukraine’s military, according to the statement.

The office also claimed that company leaders joined international charity auctions. It said proceeds from those events financed drones for Ukrainian fighters, including members of the Azov unit, which Russia classifies as a terrorist organization.

Exchange Response and Market Exit

WhiteBIT confirmed the donation figures in a statement shared. The company said the ban strengthens its commitment to supporting Ukraine. The exchange said it exited the Russian market in early 2022, soon after the invasion began. It blocked all Russian and Belarusian users and removed ruble trading pairs at that time.

WhiteBIT said those measures cut about 30% of its user base. Despite the loss, the company reported eightfold growth and said it now serves more than eight million users while expanding into the United States.

Related: Russia Orders Banks to Report Client Crypto Transactions

Broader Crypto Sanctions Context

One year into the war, Ukraine’s Ministry of Digital Transformation urged major exchanges to block Russian users. Letters went to platforms including Coinbase, Binance, Bybit, and WhiteBIT.

At the time, some exchanges declined a blanket ban. Coinbase and Kraken said they would act only when laws required enforcement while blocking sanctioned entities. Against that backdrop, Russian prosecutors accused WhiteBIT of building gray schemes to move funds abroad. The designation now extends to W Group and related entities over alleged illegal transfers.

Donations and Legal Fallout

WhiteBIT said it donated about $11 million of its own funds to Ukraine’s defence forces and humanitarian causes. Through its payment arm Whitepay, the exchange said it facilitated more than $160 million in crypto donations.

The company said these funds supported both civilian aid and defence-related fundraising. It described the actions as part of its civic position as a Ukrainian-rooted business during wartime.

For these efforts, WhiteBIT and founder Volodymyr Nosov received honours from Ukraine’s government and security services. Russia said the ban will have legal consequences for its citizens. WhiteBIT said the impact on operations will remain limited due to its earlier market exit and full blockade of Russian-linked users.

The post Russia Bans WhiteBIT Over Alleged Ukraine Military Funding appeared first on Cryptotale.

The post Russia Bans WhiteBIT Over Alleged Ukraine Military Funding appeared first on Cryptotale.
Tether Deepens Gold Exposure as Global Demand Drives PricesTether added about 27 tons of gold in late 2025 amid record global price momentum. Rising bullion prices pushed gold beyond major milestones during heavy institutional demand. Stablecoin reserves showed growing use of gold alongside US treasuries for backing. Tether added about 27 metric tonnes of gold to its fund exposure in the fourth quarter of 2025, matching heavy buying seen earlier in the year. The company confirmed the move on Monday. The purchases came as gold prices surged to new highs during the same period. According to Reuters, gold has risen 18% year to date after gaining 64% through 2025. Prices crossed $3,000 per ounce in March. They later broke $4,000 in October. On Monday, gold touched $5,000 amid strong demand and global tensions. JUST IN: Tether bought 27 metric tons of gold in Q4 2025, per Reuters. The purchase, now worth ~$4.35B, makes Tether a major gold buyer, with the CEO stating "We are operating at a scale that now places the Tether Gold Investment Fund alongside sovereign gold holders." pic.twitter.com/j8DToctKRd — Bitcoin.com News (@BitcoinNews) January 26, 2026 During this rally, Tether emerged as a notable buyer. Its reserve updates showed rapid gold accumulation tied to backing both its USDT stablecoin and the gold-backed Tether XAUT token. Stablecoin Reserves Expand Beyond Treasuries Tether issues USDT, a digital dollar with $187 billion in circulation. Each token represents one U.S. dollar held in reserve. Those reserves include cash equivalents and U.S. Treasury bills, which allow redemptions at par. Reuters reported that as spot gold prices climbed, Tether reported growing exposure to bullion. The company also issues XAUT, a stablecoin fully backed by physical gold. XAUT carried a market value of about $2.7 billion by late December. Paolo Ardoino, Tether’s chief executive, addressed the scale of holdings. “We are operating at a scale that now places the Tether Gold Investment Fund alongside sovereign gold holders,” he said in a company statement. Gold Holdings Compared With Central Banks Poland’s central bank ranked as the most active official buyer during the quarter. It increased reserves by 35 tonnes to reach 550 tonnes total. Tether did not disclose its combined gold stored in Switzerland for USDT and XAUT. For XAUT alone, Tether held 16.2 tonnes of gold by the end of December. That amount represented about 60% of the global gold-backed stablecoin supply, according to company data. Tether’s third-quarter reserve report for USDT showed $12.9 billion in gold as of late September. At prevailing prices, that equalled roughly 104 tonnes. Gold made up about 7% of USDT reserves, while Treasuries dominated. Regulation and Scrutiny Around Reserve Composition U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said stablecoin demand for Treasuries could lower government borrowing costs. Tether’s disclosures showed issuers also favour alternative assets such as gold. In September, Tether announced plans for USAT, a U.S.-regulated stablecoin aligned with the GENIUS Act. The law requires backing with cash and U.S. Treasuries and entered into force this summer. Attestations for Tether come from BDO Italia, not full audits. Critics have raised concerns for years. In July, Ardoino said Tether plans a full audit in the future. Related: Tether and Bitqik Launch Nationwide Crypto Education Program Market Expectations and Compliance Questions As of Sept. 30, BDO Italia reported $12.9 billion in precious metals backing $181 billion in fiat-denominated Tether tokens. Analysts at JPMorgan earlier suggested Tether might need to sell gold to meet future compliance needs. At that time, gold traded near $2,950. Meanwhile, traders continued to watch bullion closely. Users on Myriad, operated by Decrypt’s parent company, Dastan, leaned bullish. They assigned a 57% chance to gold reaching $5,400 rather than falling to $4,700. The post Tether Deepens Gold Exposure as Global Demand Drives Prices appeared first on Cryptotale. The post Tether Deepens Gold Exposure as Global Demand Drives Prices appeared first on Cryptotale.

Tether Deepens Gold Exposure as Global Demand Drives Prices

Tether added about 27 tons of gold in late 2025 amid record global price momentum.

Rising bullion prices pushed gold beyond major milestones during heavy institutional demand.

Stablecoin reserves showed growing use of gold alongside US treasuries for backing.

Tether added about 27 metric tonnes of gold to its fund exposure in the fourth quarter of 2025, matching heavy buying seen earlier in the year. The company confirmed the move on Monday. The purchases came as gold prices surged to new highs during the same period. According to Reuters, gold has risen 18% year to date after gaining 64% through 2025. Prices crossed $3,000 per ounce in March. They later broke $4,000 in October. On Monday, gold touched $5,000 amid strong demand and global tensions.

JUST IN: Tether bought 27 metric tons of gold in Q4 2025, per Reuters.

The purchase, now worth ~$4.35B, makes Tether a major gold buyer, with the CEO stating "We are operating at a scale that now places the Tether Gold Investment Fund alongside sovereign gold holders." pic.twitter.com/j8DToctKRd

— Bitcoin.com News (@BitcoinNews) January 26, 2026

During this rally, Tether emerged as a notable buyer. Its reserve updates showed rapid gold accumulation tied to backing both its USDT stablecoin and the gold-backed Tether XAUT token.

Stablecoin Reserves Expand Beyond Treasuries

Tether issues USDT, a digital dollar with $187 billion in circulation. Each token represents one U.S. dollar held in reserve. Those reserves include cash equivalents and U.S. Treasury bills, which allow redemptions at par.

Reuters reported that as spot gold prices climbed, Tether reported growing exposure to bullion. The company also issues XAUT, a stablecoin fully backed by physical gold. XAUT carried a market value of about $2.7 billion by late December.

Paolo Ardoino, Tether’s chief executive, addressed the scale of holdings. “We are operating at a scale that now places the Tether Gold Investment Fund alongside sovereign gold holders,” he said in a company statement.

Gold Holdings Compared With Central Banks

Poland’s central bank ranked as the most active official buyer during the quarter. It increased reserves by 35 tonnes to reach 550 tonnes total. Tether did not disclose its combined gold stored in Switzerland for USDT and XAUT.

For XAUT alone, Tether held 16.2 tonnes of gold by the end of December. That amount represented about 60% of the global gold-backed stablecoin supply, according to company data. Tether’s third-quarter reserve report for USDT showed $12.9 billion in gold as of late September. At prevailing prices, that equalled roughly 104 tonnes. Gold made up about 7% of USDT reserves, while Treasuries dominated.

Regulation and Scrutiny Around Reserve Composition

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said stablecoin demand for Treasuries could lower government borrowing costs. Tether’s disclosures showed issuers also favour alternative assets such as gold. In September, Tether announced plans for USAT, a U.S.-regulated stablecoin aligned with the GENIUS Act.

The law requires backing with cash and U.S. Treasuries and entered into force this summer. Attestations for Tether come from BDO Italia, not full audits. Critics have raised concerns for years. In July, Ardoino said Tether plans a full audit in the future.

Related: Tether and Bitqik Launch Nationwide Crypto Education Program

Market Expectations and Compliance Questions

As of Sept. 30, BDO Italia reported $12.9 billion in precious metals backing $181 billion in fiat-denominated Tether tokens. Analysts at JPMorgan earlier suggested Tether might need to sell gold to meet future compliance needs. At that time, gold traded near $2,950.

Meanwhile, traders continued to watch bullion closely. Users on Myriad, operated by Decrypt’s parent company, Dastan, leaned bullish. They assigned a 57% chance to gold reaching $5,400 rather than falling to $4,700.

The post Tether Deepens Gold Exposure as Global Demand Drives Prices appeared first on Cryptotale.

The post Tether Deepens Gold Exposure as Global Demand Drives Prices appeared first on Cryptotale.
BlackRock Celuje w Dochód z Bitcoina z Złożeniem ETF-a z Opcjami Covered-CallBlackRock złożył formularz S-1 dla ETF-a Bitcoin, który sprzedaje opcje covered call, aby generować stały dochód. Fundusz wykorzystuje opcje powiązane z IBIT, aby uzyskać premie zamiast obstawiać kierunek ceny. Analitycy mówią, że dodatkowa sprzedaż opcji call może skompresować zmienność bez wpływu na ceny Bitcoina. BlackRock cicho poszerzył możliwości, w jaki sposób inwestorzy instytucjonalni mogą uzyskać dostęp do Bitcoina, składając formularz S-1 dla nowego produktu, który łączy ekspozycję na spot z generowaniem dochodu. Proponowany ETF iShares Bitcoin Premium Income jest zaprojektowany, aby śledzić cenę Bitcoina, jednocześnie systematycznie sprzedając opcje call, przekształcając część zmienności aktywów w rozdzielany przepływ gotówki.

BlackRock Celuje w Dochód z Bitcoina z Złożeniem ETF-a z Opcjami Covered-Call

BlackRock złożył formularz S-1 dla ETF-a Bitcoin, który sprzedaje opcje covered call, aby generować stały dochód.

Fundusz wykorzystuje opcje powiązane z IBIT, aby uzyskać premie zamiast obstawiać kierunek ceny.

Analitycy mówią, że dodatkowa sprzedaż opcji call może skompresować zmienność bez wpływu na ceny Bitcoina.

BlackRock cicho poszerzył możliwości, w jaki sposób inwestorzy instytucjonalni mogą uzyskać dostęp do Bitcoina, składając formularz S-1 dla nowego produktu, który łączy ekspozycję na spot z generowaniem dochodu. Proponowany ETF iShares Bitcoin Premium Income jest zaprojektowany, aby śledzić cenę Bitcoina, jednocześnie systematycznie sprzedając opcje call, przekształcając część zmienności aktywów w rozdzielany przepływ gotówki.
Ethereum Fees Fall to 2017 Lows as Network Activity SurgesAverage Ethereum fees fall below $0.01 even as network activity remains near multi-year highs. Daily transaction counts reach nearly 2.9M without causing the sharp fee spikes seen before. Layer-2 scaling reduces congestion and keeps transaction costs close to historic lows. Ethereum is showing an unusual network pattern marked by strong activity and extremely low transaction costs. On-chain data from Glassnode shows average transaction fees have fallen below $0.01. This is the lowest level since May 2017. The decline is notable because network usage remains elevated, reversing the historical link between congestion and rising gas costs. Source: X The data indicates increased direct use of Ethereum’s base layer. The drop in fees followed the Fusaka upgrade, which reduced execution and data costs. Token Terminal reported daily active addresses on the Ethereum mainnet at about 945,000 in early January. This figure represents a clear increase compared with activity levels seen in recent months. Source: X Ethereum Handles Rising Transactions Without Fee Pressure Transaction volume has also reached high levels. On January 16, Ethereum processed close to 2.9 million transactions in a single day. In earlier cycles, similar usage resulted in sharp fee spikes. This time, costs remained compressed, signaling improved efficiency across the network. Glassnode’s seven-day average confirms that transaction fees are now at levels last observed during Ethereum’s early years. Simple transfers frequently cost less than one cent. In many cases, fees fall well below that threshold. This allows users to move funds and interact with applications without facing material cost barriers. Lower fees reduce friction for a wide range of network activity. Traders could rebalance positions without fee pressure. Users could send stablecoins without losing value to gas. Developers benefit from predictable costs, which simplifies application design and usage planning. Several technical changes explain this shift in fee dynamics. Earlier upgrades, including EIP-4844, reduced the cost of posting transaction data. Additional improvements increased effective block capacity.  Layer-2 networks also play a central role. Platforms such as Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base now handle a large share of transactions. These networks process activity off-chain and settle results on Ethereum.  Because of this architecture, Ethereum no longer faces constant demand pressure. The base layer could now accommodate settlement activity without competing with routine transactions. As a result, fees remain low even when overall usage rises.  Lower Fees Expand Ethereum Use While Shifting Supply Dynamics Lower transaction costs expand Ethereum’s practical use cases. Small-value payments are now feasible. Decentralized finance applications face fewer entry barriers. NFT minting and trading also become more accessible due to reduced costs. Related: Vitalik Shifts Ethereum Endgame Toward Resilient Sovereignty Lower fees also support broader user participation. High gas costs once discouraged smaller users from interacting with the network. That constraint has eased. New users could now explore applications without facing immediate financial friction. Developers benefit from this environment as well. Applications for payments, gaming, and social interaction become easier to deploy. User acquisition becomes less dependent on fee subsidies. This supports more sustainable application growth. Stablecoin activity also gains from lower fees. Transfers that previously cost several dollars now cost almost nothing. This improves Ethereum’s suitability for routine financial transactions. It also supports cross-border value movement with minimal overhead. However, reduced fees affect Ethereum’s supply mechanics. Lower transaction costs result in less ETH being burned. During some periods, this could lead to net supply growth rather than contraction.  Despite this, network metrics show expanding usage. Higher activity levels increase the utility of the base layer. More transactions strengthen Ethereum’s role as settlement infrastructure.  The data indicates that Ethereum is running with record efficiency. High transaction numbers are now combined with low costs. This was not seen in earlier market cycles. As of press time,  Ethereum is trading at around $2,908. The price has risen by 0.36% over the last 24 hours. It has risen by around 6% over the last week. The post Ethereum Fees Fall to 2017 Lows as Network Activity Surges appeared first on Cryptotale. The post Ethereum Fees Fall to 2017 Lows as Network Activity Surges appeared first on Cryptotale.

Ethereum Fees Fall to 2017 Lows as Network Activity Surges

Average Ethereum fees fall below $0.01 even as network activity remains near multi-year highs.

Daily transaction counts reach nearly 2.9M without causing the sharp fee spikes seen before.

Layer-2 scaling reduces congestion and keeps transaction costs close to historic lows.

Ethereum is showing an unusual network pattern marked by strong activity and extremely low transaction costs. On-chain data from Glassnode shows average transaction fees have fallen below $0.01. This is the lowest level since May 2017. The decline is notable because network usage remains elevated, reversing the historical link between congestion and rising gas costs.

Source: X

The data indicates increased direct use of Ethereum’s base layer. The drop in fees followed the Fusaka upgrade, which reduced execution and data costs. Token Terminal reported daily active addresses on the Ethereum mainnet at about 945,000 in early January. This figure represents a clear increase compared with activity levels seen in recent months.

Source: X

Ethereum Handles Rising Transactions Without Fee Pressure

Transaction volume has also reached high levels. On January 16, Ethereum processed close to 2.9 million transactions in a single day. In earlier cycles, similar usage resulted in sharp fee spikes. This time, costs remained compressed, signaling improved efficiency across the network.

Glassnode’s seven-day average confirms that transaction fees are now at levels last observed during Ethereum’s early years. Simple transfers frequently cost less than one cent. In many cases, fees fall well below that threshold. This allows users to move funds and interact with applications without facing material cost barriers.

Lower fees reduce friction for a wide range of network activity. Traders could rebalance positions without fee pressure. Users could send stablecoins without losing value to gas. Developers benefit from predictable costs, which simplifies application design and usage planning.

Several technical changes explain this shift in fee dynamics. Earlier upgrades, including EIP-4844, reduced the cost of posting transaction data. Additional improvements increased effective block capacity. 

Layer-2 networks also play a central role. Platforms such as Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base now handle a large share of transactions. These networks process activity off-chain and settle results on Ethereum. 

Because of this architecture, Ethereum no longer faces constant demand pressure. The base layer could now accommodate settlement activity without competing with routine transactions. As a result, fees remain low even when overall usage rises. 

Lower Fees Expand Ethereum Use While Shifting Supply Dynamics

Lower transaction costs expand Ethereum’s practical use cases. Small-value payments are now feasible. Decentralized finance applications face fewer entry barriers. NFT minting and trading also become more accessible due to reduced costs.

Related: Vitalik Shifts Ethereum Endgame Toward Resilient Sovereignty

Lower fees also support broader user participation. High gas costs once discouraged smaller users from interacting with the network. That constraint has eased. New users could now explore applications without facing immediate financial friction.

Developers benefit from this environment as well. Applications for payments, gaming, and social interaction become easier to deploy. User acquisition becomes less dependent on fee subsidies. This supports more sustainable application growth.

Stablecoin activity also gains from lower fees. Transfers that previously cost several dollars now cost almost nothing. This improves Ethereum’s suitability for routine financial transactions. It also supports cross-border value movement with minimal overhead.

However, reduced fees affect Ethereum’s supply mechanics. Lower transaction costs result in less ETH being burned. During some periods, this could lead to net supply growth rather than contraction. 

Despite this, network metrics show expanding usage. Higher activity levels increase the utility of the base layer. More transactions strengthen Ethereum’s role as settlement infrastructure. 

The data indicates that Ethereum is running with record efficiency. High transaction numbers are now combined with low costs. This was not seen in earlier market cycles.

As of press time,  Ethereum is trading at around $2,908. The price has risen by 0.36% over the last 24 hours. It has risen by around 6% over the last week.

The post Ethereum Fees Fall to 2017 Lows as Network Activity Surges appeared first on Cryptotale.

The post Ethereum Fees Fall to 2017 Lows as Network Activity Surges appeared first on Cryptotale.
Polymarket Becomes ‘Exclusive’ Partner of Major League SoccerPolymarket has partnered with MLS, signaling prediction markets’ shift into regulated sports. MLS will oversee markets, add monitoring, and restrict contracts that pose integrity risks. Deal shows prediction markets moving from crypto fringe toward licensed sports ecosystems. Major League Soccer(MLS) has signed an exclusive licensing agreement with Polymarket, marking a major shift for prediction markets. The deal places crypto-based prediction platforms inside licensed sports infrastructure rather than speculative crypto spaces. The agreement names Polymarket as the exclusive prediction market partner for MLS competitions. These include the MLS season, MLS Cup, MLS All-Star Game, and the Leagues Cup. Polymarket announced the partnership in an X post, confirming its exclusive status with the league. The company said users can trade without a house and without limits on its platform. We're honored to be named the exclusive prediction market partner of Major League Soccer. You can now trade with no house — and no limits. pic.twitter.com/GZa0nOOi9N — Polymarket (@Polymarket) January 26, 2026 The deal reflects a broader change in how prediction markets seek growth and legitimacy. Instead of operating on the edges of crypto, platforms now pursue institutional partnerships and regulatory alignment. Major League Soccer Chooses Oversight Over Distance MLS entered prediction markets after a long internal review process. Chris Schlosser, MLS senior vice president of emerging ventures, said discussions began more than a year ago. He said the league held senior-level talks with major prediction market platforms before deciding. The league chose engagement and oversight rather than staying outside the sector. MLS followed the NHL, which partnered with Polymarket and Kalshi last year. Other major leagues, including the NFL, NBA, and MLB, remain absent from prediction markets. The deal sits between Polymarket and Soccer United Marketing, MLS’s commercial arm. Both Polymarket and Kalshi already offered MLS-related event contracts before the agreement. MLS officials said integrity concerns drove the decision to partner directly. Schlosser said direct partnerships allow leagues to protect competition and match outcomes. MLS will influence which prediction markets Polymarket can offer. The league already plans to remove markets tied to yellow cards and red cards. It also raised concerns about markets involving penalty kicks or total shots. Schlosser said single-player control creates integrity risks the league wants to avoid. Third-party firms will monitor compliance and integrity across MLS markets. These firms include IC360 and Sportradar, which already work with sports leagues. Related: Polymarket Search Interest Hits Record High Amid US Scrutiny Prediction Markets Move Into Licensed Ecosystems The agreement gives MLS marketing exclusivity with Polymarket. The two sides will collaborate on digital fan experiences and interactive content. Stadium promotions will include LED signage and branded displays. Digital features will highlight live probabilities and fan sentiment during matches. The exclusivity applies only at the league level. MLS has not confirmed whether teams can sign separate prediction market deals. Schlosser said MLS may later approve other platforms as authorized prediction markets. These platforms would need to accept integrity rules and monitoring requirements. MLS has not finalized guidance on player endorsements with prediction platforms. Schlosser said the league continues to review those issues internally. League rules still ban players, coaches, referees, and staff from trading soccer outcomes. The ban applies to prediction markets, sports betting, and fantasy platforms. The post Polymarket Becomes ‘Exclusive’ Partner of Major League Soccer appeared first on Cryptotale. The post Polymarket Becomes ‘Exclusive’ Partner of Major League Soccer appeared first on Cryptotale.

Polymarket Becomes ‘Exclusive’ Partner of Major League Soccer

Polymarket has partnered with MLS, signaling prediction markets’ shift into regulated sports.

MLS will oversee markets, add monitoring, and restrict contracts that pose integrity risks.

Deal shows prediction markets moving from crypto fringe toward licensed sports ecosystems.

Major League Soccer(MLS) has signed an exclusive licensing agreement with Polymarket, marking a major shift for prediction markets. The deal places crypto-based prediction platforms inside licensed sports infrastructure rather than speculative crypto spaces.

The agreement names Polymarket as the exclusive prediction market partner for MLS competitions. These include the MLS season, MLS Cup, MLS All-Star Game, and the Leagues Cup. Polymarket announced the partnership in an X post, confirming its exclusive status with the league. The company said users can trade without a house and without limits on its platform.

We're honored to be named the exclusive prediction market partner of Major League Soccer.

You can now trade with no house — and no limits. pic.twitter.com/GZa0nOOi9N

— Polymarket (@Polymarket) January 26, 2026

The deal reflects a broader change in how prediction markets seek growth and legitimacy. Instead of operating on the edges of crypto, platforms now pursue institutional partnerships and regulatory alignment.

Major League Soccer Chooses Oversight Over Distance

MLS entered prediction markets after a long internal review process. Chris Schlosser, MLS senior vice president of emerging ventures, said discussions began more than a year ago. He said the league held senior-level talks with major prediction market platforms before deciding. The league chose engagement and oversight rather than staying outside the sector.

MLS followed the NHL, which partnered with Polymarket and Kalshi last year. Other major leagues, including the NFL, NBA, and MLB, remain absent from prediction markets. The deal sits between Polymarket and Soccer United Marketing, MLS’s commercial arm. Both Polymarket and Kalshi already offered MLS-related event contracts before the agreement.

MLS officials said integrity concerns drove the decision to partner directly. Schlosser said direct partnerships allow leagues to protect competition and match outcomes. MLS will influence which prediction markets Polymarket can offer. The league already plans to remove markets tied to yellow cards and red cards.

It also raised concerns about markets involving penalty kicks or total shots. Schlosser said single-player control creates integrity risks the league wants to avoid. Third-party firms will monitor compliance and integrity across MLS markets. These firms include IC360 and Sportradar, which already work with sports leagues.

Related: Polymarket Search Interest Hits Record High Amid US Scrutiny

Prediction Markets Move Into Licensed Ecosystems

The agreement gives MLS marketing exclusivity with Polymarket. The two sides will collaborate on digital fan experiences and interactive content. Stadium promotions will include LED signage and branded displays. Digital features will highlight live probabilities and fan sentiment during matches.

The exclusivity applies only at the league level. MLS has not confirmed whether teams can sign separate prediction market deals. Schlosser said MLS may later approve other platforms as authorized prediction markets. These platforms would need to accept integrity rules and monitoring requirements.

MLS has not finalized guidance on player endorsements with prediction platforms. Schlosser said the league continues to review those issues internally. League rules still ban players, coaches, referees, and staff from trading soccer outcomes. The ban applies to prediction markets, sports betting, and fantasy platforms.

The post Polymarket Becomes ‘Exclusive’ Partner of Major League Soccer appeared first on Cryptotale.

The post Polymarket Becomes ‘Exclusive’ Partner of Major League Soccer appeared first on Cryptotale.
MicroStrategy’s Biggest Asset is Not Bitcoin But BeliefMicroStrategy’s conviction in Bitcoin supports its aggressive treasury strategy. Bitcoin per share growth slowed, reducing accretion efficiency throughout January 2026. mNAV slipped below 1x, making equity pricing and investor confidence now important. MicroStrategy disclosed a $264.1 million Bitcoin purchase yesterday, funded entirely through share sales. The company bought Bitcoin at an average $90,061 during a volatile January, as prices fell into the high-$80,000 range. The move involved MicroStrategy, capital markets, and investors, driven by its ongoing treasury strategy and executed through equity issuance. Capital Markets Funding Bitcoin Purchase MicroStrategy disclosed that it acquired Bitcoin using proceeds from share sales. Notably, the company sold 1,569,770 common shares, raising $257.0 million in net proceeds. It also sold 70,201 STRC preferred shares, generating an additional $7.0 million. Together, those proceeds closely matched the $264.1 million Bitcoin purchase cost. However, the funding did not come from operating cash flows or retained earnings. Instead, MicroStrategy relied fully on capital markets to finance the acquisition. This structure matters because the company’s strategy depends on issuing shares above Bitcoin net asset value. When equity trades below asset value, issuance risks reducing value per share. That context frames the pressure building beneath the latest purchase. mNAV Compression MicroStrategy’s diluted multiple-to-net-asset-value now sits near 0.94x, according to company data. This means the stock trades at a 6% discount to its Bitcoin backing per share. However, equity issuance works best only when shares trade above net asset value. Historically, the company justified dilution by increasing Bitcoin per diluted share. That benefit now appears marginal. On January 5, MicroStrategy held 673,783 BTC with 345.6 million diluted shares. That equaled roughly 0.001949 BTC per share. By January 26, holdings rose to 712,647 BTC, while diluted shares climbed to 364.2 million. Bitcoin per share reached about 0.001957 BTC. That change shows only a 0.38% monthly increase. Also, Bitcoin per share barely moved between January 20 and January 26. During that period, new share issuance no longer produced meaningful exposure gains. As a result, accretion efficiency has weakened sharply. Dilution increased by 5.36% during January, while Bitcoin holdings rose 5.77%. Although holdings still slightly outpaced dilution, the margin narrowed significantly. This erosion coincided with the mNAV decline below parity. Related: MicroStrategy Buys 10,107 BTC, Total Now 471,107 BTC: Report Belief Now Supports Strategy  Over the past 19 months, MicroStrategy raised an estimated $18.56 billion through common equity issuance. The company issued about 226.6 million shares during that period. Notably, the January purchase extended this pattern amid weaker market conditions. The firm also increasingly relies on preferred stock issuance. Preferred shares introduce fixed claims that rank above common equity. While this approach supports continued buying, it adds long-term requirements and balance sheet complexity. MicroStrategy has over 712,000 BTC, making it the largest corporate Bitcoin holder. Its exposure makes the company a bellwether for corporate digital asset strategies entering 2026. However, that scale magnifies sensitivity to equity pricing and investor sentiment. Bitcoin has seen constant volatility in January, falling over 5% during the past week. Despite that move, MicroStrategy continued buying, according to company disclosures. Michael Saylor has consistently framed Bitcoin as a long-term treasury reserve. The strategy is intact, yet its mechanics have changed. With mNAV below 1.0x and accretion fading, continued purchases depend more on investor confidence. Access to capital markets now acts as the primary enabler. MicroStrategy’s January Bitcoin purchase reinforced its commitment but highlighted structural dependence on equity markets. Data shows dilution rising, accretion fading, and mNAV slipping below parity. As a result, market belief now sustains the strategy more than mathematical advantage. The post MicroStrategy’s Biggest Asset is Not Bitcoin But Belief appeared first on Cryptotale. The post MicroStrategy’s Biggest Asset is Not Bitcoin But Belief appeared first on Cryptotale.

MicroStrategy’s Biggest Asset is Not Bitcoin But Belief

MicroStrategy’s conviction in Bitcoin supports its aggressive treasury strategy.

Bitcoin per share growth slowed, reducing accretion efficiency throughout January 2026.

mNAV slipped below 1x, making equity pricing and investor confidence now important.

MicroStrategy disclosed a $264.1 million Bitcoin purchase yesterday, funded entirely through share sales. The company bought Bitcoin at an average $90,061 during a volatile January, as prices fell into the high-$80,000 range. The move involved MicroStrategy, capital markets, and investors, driven by its ongoing treasury strategy and executed through equity issuance.

Capital Markets Funding Bitcoin Purchase

MicroStrategy disclosed that it acquired Bitcoin using proceeds from share sales. Notably, the company sold 1,569,770 common shares, raising $257.0 million in net proceeds. It also sold 70,201 STRC preferred shares, generating an additional $7.0 million.

Together, those proceeds closely matched the $264.1 million Bitcoin purchase cost. However, the funding did not come from operating cash flows or retained earnings. Instead, MicroStrategy relied fully on capital markets to finance the acquisition.

This structure matters because the company’s strategy depends on issuing shares above Bitcoin net asset value. When equity trades below asset value, issuance risks reducing value per share. That context frames the pressure building beneath the latest purchase.

mNAV Compression

MicroStrategy’s diluted multiple-to-net-asset-value now sits near 0.94x, according to company data. This means the stock trades at a 6% discount to its Bitcoin backing per share. However, equity issuance works best only when shares trade above net asset value.

Historically, the company justified dilution by increasing Bitcoin per diluted share. That benefit now appears marginal. On January 5, MicroStrategy held 673,783 BTC with 345.6 million diluted shares. That equaled roughly 0.001949 BTC per share.

By January 26, holdings rose to 712,647 BTC, while diluted shares climbed to 364.2 million. Bitcoin per share reached about 0.001957 BTC. That change shows only a 0.38% monthly increase.

Also, Bitcoin per share barely moved between January 20 and January 26. During that period, new share issuance no longer produced meaningful exposure gains. As a result, accretion efficiency has weakened sharply.

Dilution increased by 5.36% during January, while Bitcoin holdings rose 5.77%. Although holdings still slightly outpaced dilution, the margin narrowed significantly. This erosion coincided with the mNAV decline below parity.

Related: MicroStrategy Buys 10,107 BTC, Total Now 471,107 BTC: Report

Belief Now Supports Strategy 

Over the past 19 months, MicroStrategy raised an estimated $18.56 billion through common equity issuance. The company issued about 226.6 million shares during that period. Notably, the January purchase extended this pattern amid weaker market conditions.

The firm also increasingly relies on preferred stock issuance. Preferred shares introduce fixed claims that rank above common equity. While this approach supports continued buying, it adds long-term requirements and balance sheet complexity.

MicroStrategy has over 712,000 BTC, making it the largest corporate Bitcoin holder. Its exposure makes the company a bellwether for corporate digital asset strategies entering 2026. However, that scale magnifies sensitivity to equity pricing and investor sentiment.

Bitcoin has seen constant volatility in January, falling over 5% during the past week. Despite that move, MicroStrategy continued buying, according to company disclosures. Michael Saylor has consistently framed Bitcoin as a long-term treasury reserve.

The strategy is intact, yet its mechanics have changed. With mNAV below 1.0x and accretion fading, continued purchases depend more on investor confidence. Access to capital markets now acts as the primary enabler.

MicroStrategy’s January Bitcoin purchase reinforced its commitment but highlighted structural dependence on equity markets. Data shows dilution rising, accretion fading, and mNAV slipping below parity. As a result, market belief now sustains the strategy more than mathematical advantage.

The post MicroStrategy’s Biggest Asset is Not Bitcoin But Belief appeared first on Cryptotale.

The post MicroStrategy’s Biggest Asset is Not Bitcoin But Belief appeared first on Cryptotale.
Vitalik Explains Why Blockchain Scaling Favors ComputationComputation scales through parallel work hints and proofs that reduce execution load. Data scaling requires availability, whereas erasure coding allows block-size reduction. State verification needs full system knowledge, making decentralised scaling the hardest. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin outlined a hierarchy that ranks blockchain scalability challenges by difficulty. He placed computation above data and state. His explanation came as Ethereum traded near $2,932 with steady market demand. Buterin said computation scales more easily than data because developers can parallelize processing, use hints, or replace execution with cryptographic proofs.  He explained that data scaling requires availability guarantees, while state scaling remains the hardest challenge because full verification needs complete system information. The scaling hierarchy in blockchains: Computation > data > state Computation is easier to scale than data. You can parallelize it, require the block builder to provide all kinds of "hints" for it, or just replace arbitrary amounts of it with a proof of it. Data is in the… — vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) January 27, 2026 Ethereum’s price rose 2.41% within 24 hours, while market capitalization reached $353.98 billion. Trading volume fell 4.12% to $26.61 billion. These market signals coincided with renewed discussion about scalability design choices across blockchain systems. Computation and Data in the Scaling Hierarchy Buterin described computation as the easiest layer to scale. He said developers can parallelize processing and require block builders to provide hints that reduce workload. He also said cryptographic proofs can replace large portions of computation. “Computation is easier to scale than data,” Buterin wrote. “You can parallelize it, require the block builder to provide all kinds of ‘hints’ for it, or just replace arbitrary amounts of it with a proof of it.” He then positioned data as the middle layer in the hierarchy. He explained that data availability remains unavoidable when verification depends on it. Yet he said developers can split data and apply erasure coding techniques. “Data is in the middle,” Buterin wrote. “If an availability guarantee on data is required, then that guarantee is required; there is no way around it.” He also described Peer Data Availability Sampling as a method that enables flexible scaling. He said nodes with limited capacity can still produce proportionally smaller blocks. This process creates graceful degradation across the network. “You can do graceful degradation for it,” he wrote. “If a node only has 1/10 the data capacity of the other nodes, it can always produce blocks 1/10 the size.” Hardest Layer to Scale Buterin described the state as the most difficult component to scale. He explained that nodes must access the full state to verify even one transaction. Without full state information, verification becomes impossible. “State is the hardest,” Buterin wrote. “To guarantee the ability to verify even one transaction, you need the full state.” He also explained that replacing the state with tree structures does not remove the need for full state access. Nodes still require complete state data to update the root of the structure. “If you replace the state with a tree and keep the root, you need the full state to be able to update that root,” he wrote. He acknowledged that some architectural approaches can split state across systems. Yet he said such approaches require fundamental changes and do not offer general-purpose solutions. “There are ways to split it up, but they involve architecture changes,” he wrote. “They are fundamentally not general-purpose.” Related: Kiyosaki Doubles Down on Gold, Silver, Bitcoin, and Ethereum Ethereum Research and Market Context Buterin linked the hierarchy to broader blockchain design decisions. He argued that developers should replace state with data when possible. He also said developers should replace data with computation if decentralization remains intact. “Hence, if you can replace state with data, by default you should seriously consider it,” he wrote. “And if you can replace data with computation, by default you should seriously consider it.” Ethereum researchers have pursued layer-2 solutions such as rollups to offload computation and data commitments. They have also explored PeerDAS to separate data availability from full storage requirements. These approaches aim to scale networks without forcing every node to process all data. Ethereum’s price movement reflected steady demand during this discussion. The asset climbed from an intraday low near $2,865 and briefly tested the $2,940 zone. Market capitalization rose in line with price, while trading volume declined, suggesting controlled buying rather than aggressive turnover. The post Vitalik Explains Why Blockchain Scaling Favors Computation appeared first on Cryptotale. The post Vitalik Explains Why Blockchain Scaling Favors Computation appeared first on Cryptotale.

Vitalik Explains Why Blockchain Scaling Favors Computation

Computation scales through parallel work hints and proofs that reduce execution load.

Data scaling requires availability, whereas erasure coding allows block-size reduction.

State verification needs full system knowledge, making decentralised scaling the hardest.

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin outlined a hierarchy that ranks blockchain scalability challenges by difficulty. He placed computation above data and state. His explanation came as Ethereum traded near $2,932 with steady market demand. Buterin said computation scales more easily than data because developers can parallelize processing, use hints, or replace execution with cryptographic proofs. 

He explained that data scaling requires availability guarantees, while state scaling remains the hardest challenge because full verification needs complete system information.

The scaling hierarchy in blockchains:

Computation > data > state

Computation is easier to scale than data. You can parallelize it, require the block builder to provide all kinds of "hints" for it, or just replace arbitrary amounts of it with a proof of it.

Data is in the…

— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) January 27, 2026

Ethereum’s price rose 2.41% within 24 hours, while market capitalization reached $353.98 billion. Trading volume fell 4.12% to $26.61 billion. These market signals coincided with renewed discussion about scalability design choices across blockchain systems.

Computation and Data in the Scaling Hierarchy

Buterin described computation as the easiest layer to scale. He said developers can parallelize processing and require block builders to provide hints that reduce workload. He also said cryptographic proofs can replace large portions of computation.

“Computation is easier to scale than data,” Buterin wrote. “You can parallelize it, require the block builder to provide all kinds of ‘hints’ for it, or just replace arbitrary amounts of it with a proof of it.”

He then positioned data as the middle layer in the hierarchy. He explained that data availability remains unavoidable when verification depends on it. Yet he said developers can split data and apply erasure coding techniques. “Data is in the middle,” Buterin wrote. “If an availability guarantee on data is required, then that guarantee is required; there is no way around it.”

He also described Peer Data Availability Sampling as a method that enables flexible scaling. He said nodes with limited capacity can still produce proportionally smaller blocks. This process creates graceful degradation across the network.

“You can do graceful degradation for it,” he wrote. “If a node only has 1/10 the data capacity of the other nodes, it can always produce blocks 1/10 the size.”

Hardest Layer to Scale

Buterin described the state as the most difficult component to scale. He explained that nodes must access the full state to verify even one transaction. Without full state information, verification becomes impossible. “State is the hardest,” Buterin wrote. “To guarantee the ability to verify even one transaction, you need the full state.”

He also explained that replacing the state with tree structures does not remove the need for full state access. Nodes still require complete state data to update the root of the structure. “If you replace the state with a tree and keep the root, you need the full state to be able to update that root,” he wrote.

He acknowledged that some architectural approaches can split state across systems. Yet he said such approaches require fundamental changes and do not offer general-purpose solutions. “There are ways to split it up, but they involve architecture changes,” he wrote. “They are fundamentally not general-purpose.”

Related: Kiyosaki Doubles Down on Gold, Silver, Bitcoin, and Ethereum

Ethereum Research and Market Context

Buterin linked the hierarchy to broader blockchain design decisions. He argued that developers should replace state with data when possible. He also said developers should replace data with computation if decentralization remains intact.

“Hence, if you can replace state with data, by default you should seriously consider it,” he wrote. “And if you can replace data with computation, by default you should seriously consider it.”

Ethereum researchers have pursued layer-2 solutions such as rollups to offload computation and data commitments. They have also explored PeerDAS to separate data availability from full storage requirements. These approaches aim to scale networks without forcing every node to process all data.

Ethereum’s price movement reflected steady demand during this discussion. The asset climbed from an intraday low near $2,865 and briefly tested the $2,940 zone. Market capitalization rose in line with price, while trading volume declined, suggesting controlled buying rather than aggressive turnover.

The post Vitalik Explains Why Blockchain Scaling Favors Computation appeared first on Cryptotale.

The post Vitalik Explains Why Blockchain Scaling Favors Computation appeared first on Cryptotale.
Jeel i Ripple partnerują, aby testować płatności w Arabii SaudyjskiejSaudyjskie testy bankowe blockchain jako Jeel współpracuje z Ripple w regulowanych testach sandboxowych. Narzędzia Ripple testowane do płatności transgranicznych, przechowywania i nadzoru nad tokenizacją. Sandboxowe testy są zgodne z celami Wizji 2030 z kontrolowaną innowacją finansową. Sektor bankowy Arabii Saudyjskiej dodał w tym tygodniu nowy test blockchain po tym, jak innowacyjna część Riyad Banku, Jeel, nawiązała współpracę z Ripple. Współpraca, ogłoszona na X przez dyrektora Ripple, Reece'a Merricka, koncentruje się na testach sandboxowych w Arabii Saudyjskiej. Wysiłek obejmuje regulowane testy płatności transgranicznych, przechowywania aktywów cyfrowych i tokenizacji zgodnych z Wizją 2030.

Jeel i Ripple partnerują, aby testować płatności w Arabii Saudyjskiej

Saudyjskie testy bankowe blockchain jako Jeel współpracuje z Ripple w regulowanych testach sandboxowych.

Narzędzia Ripple testowane do płatności transgranicznych, przechowywania i nadzoru nad tokenizacją.

Sandboxowe testy są zgodne z celami Wizji 2030 z kontrolowaną innowacją finansową.

Sektor bankowy Arabii Saudyjskiej dodał w tym tygodniu nowy test blockchain po tym, jak innowacyjna część Riyad Banku, Jeel, nawiązała współpracę z Ripple. Współpraca, ogłoszona na X przez dyrektora Ripple, Reece'a Merricka, koncentruje się na testach sandboxowych w Arabii Saudyjskiej. Wysiłek obejmuje regulowane testy płatności transgranicznych, przechowywania aktywów cyfrowych i tokenizacji zgodnych z Wizją 2030.
Kryzys Riala Iranu wywołuje aktywność w ekosystemie kryptowalutowymRaport Chainalysis twierdzi, że Irańczycy wypłacają Bitcoiny z giełd i przechowują je w swoich osobistych portfelach. Aby zwalczyć kryzys walutowy, Centralny Rząd Iranu kupił ponad 500 milionów dolarów w aktywach cyfrowych opartych na dolarze. W obliczu napięć geopolitycznych ekosystem kryptowalutowy Iranu urósł do prawie 7,78 miliarda dolarów w 2025 roku. Zgodnie z raportem firmy analitycznej blockchain Elliptic, Bank Centralny Iranu kupił ponad 500 milionów dolarów w aktywach cyfrowych opartych na dolarze w ubiegłym roku, aby złagodzić kryzys walutowy i obejść amerykańskie sankcje. Iran zaczął również oferować płatności kryptowalutowe za kontrakty na broń za granicą, co sygnalizuje zmianę w sposobie, w jaki sankcjonowane państwa prowadzą handel.

Kryzys Riala Iranu wywołuje aktywność w ekosystemie kryptowalutowym

Raport Chainalysis twierdzi, że Irańczycy wypłacają Bitcoiny z giełd i przechowują je w swoich osobistych portfelach.

Aby zwalczyć kryzys walutowy, Centralny Rząd Iranu kupił ponad 500 milionów dolarów w aktywach cyfrowych opartych na dolarze.

W obliczu napięć geopolitycznych ekosystem kryptowalutowy Iranu urósł do prawie 7,78 miliarda dolarów w 2025 roku.

Zgodnie z raportem firmy analitycznej blockchain Elliptic, Bank Centralny Iranu kupił ponad 500 milionów dolarów w aktywach cyfrowych opartych na dolarze w ubiegłym roku, aby złagodzić kryzys walutowy i obejść amerykańskie sankcje. Iran zaczął również oferować płatności kryptowalutowe za kontrakty na broń za granicą, co sygnalizuje zmianę w sposobie, w jaki sankcjonowane państwa prowadzą handel.
PI Utrzymuje się blisko 0,18 USD, gdy presja niedźwiedzia spotyka oznaki wyprzedaniaToken PI handluje blisko 0,18 USD, gdy szersza presja rynkowa powoduje ostrzejsze straty Duże odblokowania tokenów i słaba płynność trzymają token PI w delikatnym ustawieniu RSI pokazuje głębokie poziomy wyprzedania, a jednak sprzedawcy nadal dominują w pobliżu kluczowych barier Token PI ponownie spadł, utrzymując się blisko 0,1837 USD w momencie publikacji po kolejnej łagodnej zniżce w ciągu ostatniego dnia. Ruch ten przedłuża bolesny okres dla tokena, który teraz spadł o 11% w skali tygodnia i w przybliżeniu o 90% w porównaniu do poziomów z zeszłego roku. Spadek odzwierciedla niespokojny nastrój na szerszym rynku, gdzie apetyt na ryzyko zmalał, a mniejsze altcoiny miały trudności ze znalezieniem nabywców.

PI Utrzymuje się blisko 0,18 USD, gdy presja niedźwiedzia spotyka oznaki wyprzedania

Token PI handluje blisko 0,18 USD, gdy szersza presja rynkowa powoduje ostrzejsze straty

Duże odblokowania tokenów i słaba płynność trzymają token PI w delikatnym ustawieniu

RSI pokazuje głębokie poziomy wyprzedania, a jednak sprzedawcy nadal dominują w pobliżu kluczowych barier

Token PI ponownie spadł, utrzymując się blisko 0,1837 USD w momencie publikacji po kolejnej łagodnej zniżce w ciągu ostatniego dnia. Ruch ten przedłuża bolesny okres dla tokena, który teraz spadł o 11% w skali tygodnia i w przybliżeniu o 90% w porównaniu do poziomów z zeszłego roku. Spadek odzwierciedla niespokojny nastrój na szerszym rynku, gdzie apetyt na ryzyko zmalał, a mniejsze altcoiny miały trudności ze znalezieniem nabywców.
Producent portfeli sprzętowych do kryptowalut Ledger bada możliwość IPO w USA o wartości 4 miliardów dolarówLedger celuje w wycenę 4 miliardów dolarów, ponieważ popyt na bezpieczne portfele samoopiekuncze rośnie. Wzrost liczby włamań do kryptowalut i oszustw napędza silniejszy popyt na offline'owe zabezpieczenia sprzętowe. Goldman, Jefferies i Barclays wspierają planowany przez Ledger ruch na amerykańskich rynkach publicznych. Ledger przygotowuje się do potencjalnej oferty publicznej (IPO) w USA, która mogłaby wycenić firmę na ponad 4 miliardy dolarów, zgodnie z informacjami od osób zaznajomionych z tą sprawą. Francuski producent portfeli sprzętowych do kryptowalut zaangażował Goldman Sachs, Jefferies i Barclays, aby doradzić w sprawie notowania w USA. Osoby te powiedziały, że debiut na giełdzie w Nowym Jorku mógłby nastąpić najwcześniej w 2026 roku.

Producent portfeli sprzętowych do kryptowalut Ledger bada możliwość IPO w USA o wartości 4 miliardów dolarów

Ledger celuje w wycenę 4 miliardów dolarów, ponieważ popyt na bezpieczne portfele samoopiekuncze rośnie.

Wzrost liczby włamań do kryptowalut i oszustw napędza silniejszy popyt na offline'owe zabezpieczenia sprzętowe.

Goldman, Jefferies i Barclays wspierają planowany przez Ledger ruch na amerykańskich rynkach publicznych.

Ledger przygotowuje się do potencjalnej oferty publicznej (IPO) w USA, która mogłaby wycenić firmę na ponad 4 miliardy dolarów, zgodnie z informacjami od osób zaznajomionych z tą sprawą.

Francuski producent portfeli sprzętowych do kryptowalut zaangażował Goldman Sachs, Jefferies i Barclays, aby doradzić w sprawie notowania w USA. Osoby te powiedziały, że debiut na giełdzie w Nowym Jorku mógłby nastąpić najwcześniej w 2026 roku.
Post Shock Bondów w Japonii podnosi cenę złota, podczas gdy Bitcoin czeka na sygnał BOJRentowności obligacji Japonii rosną i zmieniają sygnały ryzyka, podczas gdy złoto rośnie w czasie stresu rynkowego. Bitcoin zostaje w tyle za złotem, podczas gdy inwestorzy czekają na wyraźne działanie w zakresie płynności ze strony Banku Japonii. Wsparcie obligacji BOJ osłabia jena i wzmacnia popyt na złoto na rynkach. Ceny złota wzrosły, podczas gdy Bitcoin zostawał w tyle na początku 2026 roku, gdy rynek obligacji Japonii stał się kluczowym czynnikiem kształtującym globalne odczucia ryzyka. Rosnące rentowności zmieniły przepływy kapitału i pozycjonowanie inwestorów w różnych aktywach. Rząd Japonii podniósł swój poziom alertu, ponieważ ruchy na rynku obligacji spowodowały kryzys finansowy dla inwestorów. Urzędnicy potwierdzili, że warunki rynkowe poprawiły się po ostatniej wyprzedaży, ale uznali, że stopy, waluty i aktywa ryzykowne wciąż doświadczają zmienności.

Post Shock Bondów w Japonii podnosi cenę złota, podczas gdy Bitcoin czeka na sygnał BOJ

Rentowności obligacji Japonii rosną i zmieniają sygnały ryzyka, podczas gdy złoto rośnie w czasie stresu rynkowego.

Bitcoin zostaje w tyle za złotem, podczas gdy inwestorzy czekają na wyraźne działanie w zakresie płynności ze strony Banku Japonii.

Wsparcie obligacji BOJ osłabia jena i wzmacnia popyt na złoto na rynkach.

Ceny złota wzrosły, podczas gdy Bitcoin zostawał w tyle na początku 2026 roku, gdy rynek obligacji Japonii stał się kluczowym czynnikiem kształtującym globalne odczucia ryzyka. Rosnące rentowności zmieniły przepływy kapitału i pozycjonowanie inwestorów w różnych aktywach. Rząd Japonii podniósł swój poziom alertu, ponieważ ruchy na rynku obligacji spowodowały kryzys finansowy dla inwestorów. Urzędnicy potwierdzili, że warunki rynkowe poprawiły się po ostatniej wyprzedaży, ale uznali, że stopy, waluty i aktywa ryzykowne wciąż doświadczają zmienności.
Bears DOGE Trzymają się Mocno Mimo Byczych Wezwań AnalitykówDOGE pozostaje w ostrym spadku mimo słabego wczesnego popytu po uruchomieniu ETF Nasdaq Długie likwidacje rosną, gdy otwarte zainteresowanie spada, co oznacza zmniejszającą się pewność na rynku Analitycy podkreślają struktury trójkąta i kanału, sugerując potencjał przełomu w długim okresie Spadek Dogecoina trwa już drugi tydzień, a ton w rynkach pozostaje ciężki. Token dryfuje w dół od początku września, rzadko znajdując wystarczającą siłę, aby się ustabilizować, nie mówiąc już o odwróceniu kursu. Do południa DOGE utrzymywał się w pobliżu 0,1244 USD. Ruch ten obniżył wartość o kolejny punkt procentowy w ciągu dnia i zwiększył tygodniowe straty do około 11%. Ponadto, jego roczna wydajność opowiada głębszą historię: spadek o 64,67%, co podkreśla, jak uporczywy był ten trend.

Bears DOGE Trzymają się Mocno Mimo Byczych Wezwań Analityków

DOGE pozostaje w ostrym spadku mimo słabego wczesnego popytu po uruchomieniu ETF Nasdaq

Długie likwidacje rosną, gdy otwarte zainteresowanie spada, co oznacza zmniejszającą się pewność na rynku

Analitycy podkreślają struktury trójkąta i kanału, sugerując potencjał przełomu w długim okresie

Spadek Dogecoina trwa już drugi tydzień, a ton w rynkach pozostaje ciężki. Token dryfuje w dół od początku września, rzadko znajdując wystarczającą siłę, aby się ustabilizować, nie mówiąc już o odwróceniu kursu.

Do południa DOGE utrzymywał się w pobliżu 0,1244 USD. Ruch ten obniżył wartość o kolejny punkt procentowy w ciągu dnia i zwiększył tygodniowe straty do około 11%. Ponadto, jego roczna wydajność opowiada głębszą historię: spadek o 64,67%, co podkreśla, jak uporczywy był ten trend.
Indie zaostrzają przepisy dotyczące prywatnych kryptowalut w związku z ryzykiem prania pieniędzyFIU nakazuje indyjskim giełdom zaprzestanie obsługi anonimowych tokenów kryptowalutowych. Monety prywatności, takie jak Monero, Zcash i Dash, są teraz ograniczone według wytycznych. Dyrektywa wzmacnia zasady AML, monitorowanie portfeli i nadzór nad kryptowalutami offshore. Indyjski Zespół Wywiadu Finansowego nakazał giełdom kryptowalutowym zaprzestanie obsługi cyfrowych tokenów skoncentrowanych na prywatności, powołując się na zwiększone ryzyko prania pieniędzy. Dyrektywa, wydana na początku tego miesiąca w ramach zaktualizowanych wytycznych dotyczących zgodności, dotyczy aktywów kryptowalutowych zwiększających anonimowość, które są handlowane na krajowych platformach. Działanie obejmuje giełdy, pośredników i regulatorów, mając na celu ograniczenie nieuchwytnych transakcji poprzez ograniczenie sposobu, w jaki takie aktywa wchodzą i wychodzą z systemu.

Indie zaostrzają przepisy dotyczące prywatnych kryptowalut w związku z ryzykiem prania pieniędzy

FIU nakazuje indyjskim giełdom zaprzestanie obsługi anonimowych tokenów kryptowalutowych.

Monety prywatności, takie jak Monero, Zcash i Dash, są teraz ograniczone według wytycznych.

Dyrektywa wzmacnia zasady AML, monitorowanie portfeli i nadzór nad kryptowalutami offshore.

Indyjski Zespół Wywiadu Finansowego nakazał giełdom kryptowalutowym zaprzestanie obsługi cyfrowych tokenów skoncentrowanych na prywatności, powołując się na zwiększone ryzyko prania pieniędzy. Dyrektywa, wydana na początku tego miesiąca w ramach zaktualizowanych wytycznych dotyczących zgodności, dotyczy aktywów kryptowalutowych zwiększających anonimowość, które są handlowane na krajowych platformach. Działanie obejmuje giełdy, pośredników i regulatorów, mając na celu ograniczenie nieuchwytnych transakcji poprzez ograniczenie sposobu, w jaki takie aktywa wchodzą i wychodzą z systemu.
Znikający Bitcoin, gdy Korea Południowa rozszerza kontrolę nad kryptowalutamiProkuratorzy odkryli, że skonfiskowany Bitcoin zniknął po audycie w ubiegłym roku. Śledczy łączą tę stratę z phishingiem związanym z ujawnionym dostępem do portfela. Sprawa pojawia się, gdy sądy potwierdzają szersze uprawnienia do konfiskaty aktywów cyfrowych w całym kraju. Koreańscy prokuratorzy prowadzą śledztwo w sprawie zniknięcia Bitcoina, który został skonfiskowany jako środki z przestępstwa, po tym jak wewnętrzny audyt wykazał brakujące aktywa pod opieką państwową. Władze szacują straty na około 70 miliardów wonów, czyli 48 milionów dolarów. Źródło z prokuratury powiedziało lokalnym mediom, że Bitcoin prawdopodobnie zniknął podczas zarządzania w zeszłym roku.

Znikający Bitcoin, gdy Korea Południowa rozszerza kontrolę nad kryptowalutami

Prokuratorzy odkryli, że skonfiskowany Bitcoin zniknął po audycie w ubiegłym roku.

Śledczy łączą tę stratę z phishingiem związanym z ujawnionym dostępem do portfela.

Sprawa pojawia się, gdy sądy potwierdzają szersze uprawnienia do konfiskaty aktywów cyfrowych w całym kraju.

Koreańscy prokuratorzy prowadzą śledztwo w sprawie zniknięcia Bitcoina, który został skonfiskowany jako środki z przestępstwa, po tym jak wewnętrzny audyt wykazał brakujące aktywa pod opieką państwową. Władze szacują straty na około 70 miliardów wonów, czyli 48 milionów dolarów. Źródło z prokuratury powiedziało lokalnym mediom, że Bitcoin prawdopodobnie zniknął podczas zarządzania w zeszłym roku.
Chainlink Nabywa Atlas, aby Rozszerzyć SVR i Wzmocnić Przygotowania do DeFiChainlink nabył Atlas, aby rozszerzyć SVR i zwiększyć przychody DeFi poprzez odzyskiwanie multi-chain. Integracja Atlas rozszerza SVR Chainlink na nowe łańcuchy, pomagając protokołom odzyskać MEV. Umowa przyspiesza adopcję SVR w ekosystemach i dodaje zrównoważone przychody dla DeFi. Chainlink nabył Atlas od FastLane, aby rozszerzyć swoje rozwiązanie SVR i zwiększyć możliwości przychodowe w ekosystemach finansów zdecentralizowanych. Ten ruch przynosi sprawdzoną technologię przepływu zamówień bezpośrednio pod standard Chainlink. Oznacza to również krok w kierunku skalowania odzyskiwania wartości w wielu blockchainach.

Chainlink Nabywa Atlas, aby Rozszerzyć SVR i Wzmocnić Przygotowania do DeFi

Chainlink nabył Atlas, aby rozszerzyć SVR i zwiększyć przychody DeFi poprzez odzyskiwanie multi-chain.

Integracja Atlas rozszerza SVR Chainlink na nowe łańcuchy, pomagając protokołom odzyskać MEV.

Umowa przyspiesza adopcję SVR w ekosystemach i dodaje zrównoważone przychody dla DeFi.

Chainlink nabył Atlas od FastLane, aby rozszerzyć swoje rozwiązanie SVR i zwiększyć możliwości przychodowe w ekosystemach finansów zdecentralizowanych. Ten ruch przynosi sprawdzoną technologię przepływu zamówień bezpośrednio pod standard Chainlink. Oznacza to również krok w kierunku skalowania odzyskiwania wartości w wielu blockchainach.
Utrzymanie stopy BOJ maskuje rosnące ryzyko jena dla Bitcoina, kryptowalutBOJ utrzymuje stopę referencyjną na poziomie 0,75%, jednocześnie podnosząc prognozy inflacji i wzrostu. Osłabienie jena i rosnące rentowności obligacji zwiększają ryzyko dla lewarowanych pozycji kryptograficznych. Sprzeczny głos sygnalizuje wewnętrzną presję na szybsze zacieśnianie i ostrożność rynku. Japoński bank centralny utrzymał stopy procentowe na niezmienionym poziomie w piątek, jednak decyzja cicho podniosła nowe ryzyko dla rynku Bitcoin i kryptowalut. Bank Japonii utrzymał swoją stopę referencyjną na poziomie 0,75% w Tokio 23 stycznia, podnosząc prognozy inflacji i wzrostu. Chociaż ceny ledwo się zmieniły, głosowanie ujawniło wewnętrzne napięcia polityki, ryzyko finansowania w jenach oraz rosnącą presję na lewarowane pozycje kryptograficzne.

Utrzymanie stopy BOJ maskuje rosnące ryzyko jena dla Bitcoina, kryptowalut

BOJ utrzymuje stopę referencyjną na poziomie 0,75%, jednocześnie podnosząc prognozy inflacji i wzrostu.

Osłabienie jena i rosnące rentowności obligacji zwiększają ryzyko dla lewarowanych pozycji kryptograficznych.

Sprzeczny głos sygnalizuje wewnętrzną presję na szybsze zacieśnianie i ostrożność rynku.

Japoński bank centralny utrzymał stopy procentowe na niezmienionym poziomie w piątek, jednak decyzja cicho podniosła nowe ryzyko dla rynku Bitcoin i kryptowalut. Bank Japonii utrzymał swoją stopę referencyjną na poziomie 0,75% w Tokio 23 stycznia, podnosząc prognozy inflacji i wzrostu. Chociaż ceny ledwo się zmieniły, głosowanie ujawniło wewnętrzne napięcia polityki, ryzyko finansowania w jenach oraz rosnącą presję na lewarowane pozycje kryptograficzne.
Cena SAND skacze o 11%, gdy dwutygodniowa bycza seria się wydłużaCena SAND rośnie, gdy popyt na GameFi wzrasta, a wolumen skacze wśród głównych tokenów. Kupujący bronią strefy $0.14–$0.10, podczas gdy wyższe dołki kształtują wczesną strukturę odbicia. Kluczowy opór w pobliżu $0.29 ogranicza wzrosty, ponieważ szerszy trend sygnalizuje ostrożność. Cena SAND znów wzrosła dzisiaj, dodając prawie 11% w ciągu 24 godzin i wydłużając odbicie, które budowało się przez dwa tygodnie. Ruch ten następuje po silnym okresie, kiedy token wzrósł o około 30% w zeszłym tygodniu i ponownie pojawił się w rozmowach rynkowych po okresie stonowanego handlu.

Cena SAND skacze o 11%, gdy dwutygodniowa bycza seria się wydłuża

Cena SAND rośnie, gdy popyt na GameFi wzrasta, a wolumen skacze wśród głównych tokenów.

Kupujący bronią strefy $0.14–$0.10, podczas gdy wyższe dołki kształtują wczesną strukturę odbicia.

Kluczowy opór w pobliżu $0.29 ogranicza wzrosty, ponieważ szerszy trend sygnalizuje ostrożność.

Cena SAND znów wzrosła dzisiaj, dodając prawie 11% w ciągu 24 godzin i wydłużając odbicie, które budowało się przez dwa tygodnie. Ruch ten następuje po silnym okresie, kiedy token wzrósł o około 30% w zeszłym tygodniu i ponownie pojawił się w rozmowach rynkowych po okresie stonowanego handlu.
Strategia Tokenizacji NYSE wywołuje debatę nad brakującymi szczegółamiEksperci ostrzegają, że plan tokenizacji NYSE brakuje jasnego projektu blockchain i ekonomii tokenów. Obawy dotyczące centralizacji rosną, ponieważ model tokenizacji NYSE wydaje się utrzymywać pośredników. Liderzy branży kryptowalut nadal postrzegają tokenizowane akcje na łańcuchu jako znaczącą kamień milowy na rynku. Plan tokenizacji NYSE wywołał debatę na temat tego, czy Giełda Papierów Wartościowych w Nowym Jorku jest gotowa dostarczyć prawdziwą platformę blockchain czy tylko szeroką wizję. Propozycja dotyczy tokenizowanych akcji i tokenizowanych funduszy inwestycyjnych (ETF) z nowoczesnymi cechami rynkowymi.

Strategia Tokenizacji NYSE wywołuje debatę nad brakującymi szczegółami

Eksperci ostrzegają, że plan tokenizacji NYSE brakuje jasnego projektu blockchain i ekonomii tokenów.

Obawy dotyczące centralizacji rosną, ponieważ model tokenizacji NYSE wydaje się utrzymywać pośredników.

Liderzy branży kryptowalut nadal postrzegają tokenizowane akcje na łańcuchu jako znaczącą kamień milowy na rynku.

Plan tokenizacji NYSE wywołał debatę na temat tego, czy Giełda Papierów Wartościowych w Nowym Jorku jest gotowa dostarczyć prawdziwą platformę blockchain czy tylko szeroką wizję. Propozycja dotyczy tokenizowanych akcji i tokenizowanych funduszy inwestycyjnych (ETF) z nowoczesnymi cechami rynkowymi.
Zaloguj się, aby odkryć więcej treści
Poznaj najnowsze wiadomości dotyczące krypto
⚡️ Weź udział w najnowszych dyskusjach na temat krypto
💬 Współpracuj ze swoimi ulubionymi twórcami
👍 Korzystaj z treści, które Cię interesują
E-mail / Numer telefonu
Mapa strony
Preferencje dotyczące plików cookie
Regulamin platformy