Crypto Marketers

$ONT Over the past year, Web3 distribution has continued to grow in scope and ambition. This expansion has brought innovation, but also fragmentation. New blockchains, execution environments, and user segments have created an ecosystem full of opportunity, while simultaneously increasing complexity for both users and builders.
Distribution Is No Longer About Reach Alone
For Web3 projects, distribution has shifted from a numbers game to a trust-driven strategy. Visibility by itself is no longer enough. What matters now is context, credibility, and the quality of user engagement. As users become more cautious and projects more selective, the signal-to-noise ratio has emerged as a defining factor for sustainable growth.
ONTO Wallet Reflects a Broader Industry Shift
reducing friction, clarifying risk, and enabling users to explore products with confidence. This reflects a broader move away from raw exposure toward relevance and alignment.
From Reach to Relevance in a Maturing Ecosystem
clearer information, regulators are paying closer attention, and serious projects care deeply about where and how they onboard users. ONTO’s development mirrors this transition by prioritizing informed participation over impulsive discovery.
Abstraction Has Become Essential, Not Optional
Multi-chain is no longer a future promise — it is the current reality. While backend infrastructure has advanced rapidly, user experience has struggled to keep pace. ONTO’s work to simplify multi-chain interactions, improve transaction clarity, and streamline swaps and bridges highlights a core truth: if users need to understand infrastructure to use a product, adoption will stall.
Owning Complexity on Behalf of the User
Abstraction is not about hiding what’s happening under the hood, but about responsibly managing complexity for users. Distribution platforms that fail to do this increasingly act as obstacles rather than gateways. ONTO’s approach demonstrates how owning this complexity can unlock smoother onboarding and deeper engagement.
Trust Is No Longer Implied — It Must Be Designed
In Web3, trust has evolved from an assumption into a product feature. Security, permissions, and identity directly shape whether users feel confident interacting with new protocols. ONTO’s emphasis on visible risk indicators, transparent approvals, and optional identity integration reflects a growing understanding that trust must be continuously reinforced.
Identity and Security as Enablers, Not Barriers
Ontology’s work on decentralized identity underpins this trust-first approach. By applying verification only where it matters, trust can enhance user confidence without introducing unnecessary friction. This creates a healthier environment for both users and builders.
Discovery Is Becoming a Guided Experience
As the number of Web3 projects increases, discovery has become constrained not by scarcity, but by overload. ONTO’s shift toward a more curated discovery experience reflects a changing expectation for distribution platforms. They are no longer neutral pipes, but active participants in helping users navigate the ecosystem responsibly.
Higher-Quality Engagement Over Short-Term Attention
Contextual discovery leads to users who understand what they are engaging with, why it matters, and what risks are involved. This results in engagement that is more durable and meaningful, rather than fleeting or speculative.
What ONTO’s Evolution Signals to Partners
The maturation of ONTO Wallet is not an isolated product update. It reflects Ontology’s broader vision for Web3 distribution: fewer but more meaningful integrations, intentional user exploration, purposeful use of trust and identity, and distribution that supports learning rather than chasing liquidity.
Integration Means Participation, Not Just Placement
For partners, integrating with ONTO is not simply about appearing inside a wallet interface. It is about joining an ecosystem designed to reduce friction, align incentives, and foster sustainable user relationships.
The Future of Web3 Distribution
As Web3 continues to evolve, the platforms that succeed will be those that treat trust, abstraction, and discovery as foundational responsibilities. Ontology will continue building the infrastructure that enables this shift, while ONTO delivers it through real-world user experience.
Choosing the Right Kind of Distribution
For projects aiming to reach users who are early, curious, and increasingly selective, the critical question is no longer whether distribution matters, but what kind of distribution aligns with long-term success.
Working With Ontology
Ontology is open to conversations with teams building Web3 products who are exploring wallet-based distribution, identity-enabled access, and early user discovery grounded in trust. Integration into the Ontology ecosystem, including ONTO Wallet, is designed to support growth that is intentional, credible, and sustainable.

Bitcoin (BTC) continues its volatile path today, down 0.70% over the last 24 hours. The decline of this asset has sparked concerns among traders.
However, some analysts argue that Bitcoin's performance is a result of potential price manipulation, pointing to recurring decline patterns around the opening of the US market, as well as institutional involvement.
Internal Manipulation vs. Market Dynamics: Unraveling the Decline of Bitcoin
Bitcoin has surpassed all bullish expectations in Q4, a historically strong period for this asset. While the market downturn on October 10 was a major factor behind BTC's decline at the start of the quarter, market observers are now questioning the continuation of this weakness.
Traders are increasingly frustrated by Bitcoin's lack of response to market developments. For example, yesterday, Strategy (formerly known as MicroStrategy) announced it had purchased 10,624 BTC for $962.7 million.
However, despite this bullish news, Bitcoin is back in the red today, down 0.70% and trading at $90,487.
On the other hand, negative developments also trigger the same selling pattern. Analyst Ash Crypto highlighted that the market continues to act irrationally and does not respond to positive developments as it usually does.
In a separate post, Ash suggested that Bitcoin's fall from $126,000 to $80,000 cannot be considered a normal market correction. He noted that since the October market crisis and historic liquidations:
US equities have risen 8%, with many stocks reaching new all-time highs.
However, Bitcoin remains 29% below the level before the fall, and any short-term rallies face significant selling.
About $500 million in liquidations happen almost every two days, indicating a continuous forced selling.
“If this is just leverage it should be short-lived and the market should bounce back fairly quickly but instead we keep dumping without a major bounce. This is not normal. It looks like some big institutions are playing with the market and liquidating long and short positions. Another rumor in town is that many large funds blew up on October 10 and they are selling BTC to cover their losses,” he added.
Moreover, another analyst pointed to Bitcoin's price action over the weekend as evidence of recent manipulation. The post revealed that this cryptocurrency briefly fell from around $89,700 to $87,700, triggering about $171 million in long liquidations.
In a matter of hours, the movement reversed sharply, with Bitcoin soaring to around $91,200 and wiping out an additional short position worth $75 million.
“This is another example of manipulation on a low liquidity weekend to wipe out long and short positions using leverage,” Bull Theory wrote.
Is Jane Street Behind the Morning Bitcoin Dump?
Interestingly, market observers also noted a clear trend: Bitcoin often experiences sharp declines around 10 AM, after the US market opens. This pattern has been observed since early November and reflects similar activity seen earlier this year.
Its consistency indicates a coordinated approach, rather than a random response. Bull Theory points to Jane Street, a large high-frequency trading firm, as a potential source. Jane Street reportedly holds $2.5 billion of BlackRock's IBIT ETF, making it the fifth largest position.
“When you look at the chart, the pattern is too consistent to ignore: a net dump in the hour after the market opens followed by a slow recovery. This is classic high-frequency execution. It means that most of the dumps in BTC are not caused by macro weakness but by manipulation by one large entity,” the analysis revealed.
The suspected strategy is simple. High-frequency traders sell BTC when the market opens, pushing prices into liquidity pockets and then buy back at lower levels. They repeat this cycle, profiting from predictable volatility and accumulating billions in Bitcoin.
“Yes, it’s called wash trading and has been illegal in the Stock Market since 1933. There are no laws in crypto, they can wash trade at will until they pass the Market Structure Bill. The problem is monitoring Jane Street because they don't do it on-chain, they do it through ETFs. We can't track their moves. Wintermute uses on-chain with Binance, but Jane Street is completely untraceable,” Marty Party stated.
However, analysts believe the impact may be temporary. After the main operators complete their accumulation phase, Bitcoin could return to an upward trajectory driven by fundamentals.

Bitcoin $BTC 92 691,23 USD, wiodąca kryptowaluta pod względem wartości rynkowej, spadł po nocnym obniżeniu stopy Fed. Powód prawdopodobnie leży w komunikacji Fed, która sprawiła, że handlowcy są mniej podekscytowani przyszłym luzowaniem polityki.
Fed w środę obniżył podstawową stopę procentową o 25 punktów bazowych do 3,25%, zgodnie z oczekiwaniami, i ogłosił, że zacznie kupować krótkoterminowe bony skarbowe, aby zarządzać płynnością w systemie bankowym.
Jednak BTC handlował poniżej 90 000 USD w momencie publikacji, co oznacza spadek o 2,4% od wczesnych godzin handlowych w Azji, według danych CoinDesk. Ether spadł o 4% do 3 190 USD, a indeks CoinDesk 20 spadł o ponad 4%.