After months of work, I’ve leveraged AI to craft 3 BTC futures quant signals, and today they’re officially open for subscription.
Each strategy has its own role: · SYS03 EMA Triple Pulse — Tracks mid-term trend waves, with 54 trades over the past year, profit factor of 1.46 · SYS05 Volatility Energy Breakout — Bollinger Bands + Keltner Double Compression, capturing energy explosions, profit factor of 1.49 · SYS06 RSI Divergence Reversal — Only 15 trades in the past year, win rate of 66.67%, profit factor of 3.57, with a max drawdown of just 0.25%
All backtested on TradingView, so you can replicate the numbers yourself, no need to take my word for it.
Each signal includes: ✓ Real-time annotations for entry direction + SL / TP levels ✓ TradingView alerts pushed directly, getting notified of entry price / stop-loss / take-profit without having to watch the charts ✓ Backtest version for historical performance verification
Background: Former KOL team & CEX researcher, now independently developing trading systems.
If you're interested, DM me on X (Twitter) to learn about the subscription options, spots are limited, first come, first served.
Volume is the most important key today. If the price rises but volume doesn’t keep up—that’s a fake breakout, don’t chase. Let the volume show up first, then we talk about direction.
Today’s strategy: Wait for volume confirmation → then decide on direction If there’s no volume → stay on the sidelines; cash is also a position
Resistance: in the upper 1–2% range (with prior dense trading) Support: near the lower 1.5% (uptrend line)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks above resistance with increased volume → direction is confirmed; you can follow If it rises on declining volume → wait for a pullback and then reassess
Even days without trading are a kind of trading decision.
If you could go back to the first day of trading, what would you most want to tell yourself?
My answer:
“First learn position/risk management, then learn technical analysis.”
Most people do it in the wrong order—learn candlesticks, indicators, and patterns first. You may be able to identify the direction correctly, but you still end up losing money.
That’s because you haven’t done proper risk management.
Even if you only have a 60% win rate, and pair it with a 2R risk/reward ratio, long-term you’ll still have a positive expected value.
Trading for five years, and the one thing that cost me the most in tuition:
Not misreading the direction. Not picking the wrong coin.
It was trading purely based on emotions when I had no system.
When the market was good: I held very large positions, thinking I was a genius. When the market turned worse: I kept changing direction, stopped out and flipped again and again—until I got hit on both sides.
In that period, I went back through my trade records— When I made money, I always had a reason. When I lost money, I also always had a reason.
The problem isn’t whether the reasons were right or wrong; It’s that I didn’t have a fixed framework to constrain myself.
Later, I forced myself to systematize— No matter how strong the feelings were, if there was no signal, I wouldn’t move.
It was painful for a while, but the results became stable.
With a system versus without one, the gap after five years isn’t in returns—it’s in mindset.
Tell me about the trading mistake that left the deepest impression on me.
That was when I was just starting to build quantitative trading systems.
The system generated a short signal. I looked at it and thought, “The direction is wrong,” so I didn’t execute.
As it turned out, if I had executed that trade, the profit factor would have been 4R.
Even worse, later on I “made my own judgment” and went long—then I stopped out.
That day made me realize something: I design the system because I don’t trust my intuition. If I don’t trust the system, what’s the point of having it?
From that day on, I stopped “overriding” the system signals.
When building my first quant trading system, I stepped into three pitfalls.
Pitfall 1: Overfitting The backtest looked ridiculously good, but once I went live, it fell apart. Reason: I tuned the parameters too closely to historical data.
Pitfall 2: Ignoring trading fees In the backtest, I made $50 per trade—but in live trading, after fees, I only ended up with $15. That means returns were slashed by 70%.
Pitfall 3: No stop-loss logic “Quant systems won’t do anything reckless.” Until one time the market moved and wiped out 20% in a single wave—I realized quant trading can still blow up.
The SYS series was built slowly only after stepping into these three pitfalls. Without pitfalls, there’s no system.
Resistance: in the upper 1–2% range (with prior dense trading) Support: around the lower 1.5% (rising trendline)
Volume interpretation: If it breaks through resistance with increased volume → direction confirmed; you can follow. If price rises on low volume → wait for a pullback to reassess.
Even days with no trades are a form of trading decision.
Market Weekly Report | What is BTC telling us this week?
Overall, this week BTC is showing a high-level consolidation pattern.
Trading volume gradually shrank, indicating that both bulls and bears are waiting.
Usually, there are two ways this pattern ends: 1. Trading volume suddenly expands → a direction is chosen 2. Continue ranging sideways until an external catalyst appears
My current view: before the direction becomes clear, keep watching.
Confirming later is the most labor-saving approach.
Someone said, “I’m always getting liquidated, or on the way to getting liquidated. I just want to learn from you.”
Those words made me think for a long time.
Because I’ve walked that road too. That feeling of resetting to zero again and again, and telling yourself, “Next time for sure,”—I understand it all too well.
But his line—“I’m not that greedy. I just want to learn”— In a market full of leverage dreams, someone who can say that has already won half the battle, mentally.
The ones who truly manage to survive in the market were never the smartest or the boldest gambler.
It’s the one who stays low-key, and is most willing to admit when they’re wrong.
If you’re also on the road, leave a comment and tell me which stage you’re stuck at.
Why do I trust quantitative trading systems instead of “feelings”?
Because feelings can deceive you, but data won’t.
Looking back at my trading records from the past five years: · Two years of trading based on feelings: huge account fluctuations, and my mood was all over the place · Three years after becoming systematic: much more stable—even when there were losses, they were within expectations
Quant trading isn’t a cure-all, but it does one very important thing: It prevents “emotions” from interfering with decisions.
Signals come in, then act; if no signals come in, then wait. That’s it.
Market Weekly Review | What Is BTC Telling Us This Week?
Overall, this week BTC showed a high-level consolidation pattern.
Trading volume gradually decreased, indicating that both the bulls and bears are waiting.
Typically, there are two ways this kind of pattern ends: 1. Volume suddenly expands → direction is chosen 2. Continue ranging until an external catalyst appears
My current view: keep observing until the direction becomes clear.
Once confirmed, it’s the most effortless approach.