O L I V I E

I am a fan of the idea of powering people over their own data via blockchains, and thus I followed the Plasma project attentively. Contrary to most projects, which introduce a new DeFi token or a scaling solution, Plasma will seek to break down the data silos surrounding blockchains to actually allow users to own their digital assets. This paper will describe Plasma in simple language, the issues it addresses, how it functions, and why I believe it is important. In between, I will use charts and pictures that depict the ideas.

The Issue: Scattered Data and High Prices.

Blockchains have created an abundance of decentralised apps, although they present new bottlenecks. All the data are stored in different chains, and, therefore, Ethereum data cannot be easily read in Solana or Avalanche. Those who add excessive information to single chains incur huge charges. Larger files are used by users on off-chain services such as IPFS or Arweave. Those are useful services, however, they do not simplify the process of transferring data between chains. The outcome is a disjointed playground with apps unable to share information easily and users of apps unable to carry hundreds of wallets to store their resources.

A Chain agnostic solution to storage networks: Plasma.

Plasma reinvents the concept of blockchain storage as a layer of neutrality below every network. It has a decentralised physical infrastructure in which anyone has the potential to contribute to storage and bandwidth by running a validator node. A proof-of-stake consensus is employed by the validators. They encrypt XPL tokens to be able to store data.

Plasma makes use of evidence of spacetime to maintain data. Validators also issue cryptographic evidence showing that they still possess the files they are compensated to store. In case a node is unable to provide a proof, the node loses its stake. It is a system that rewards honesty but not any particular side.

What I like the most about it is that Plasma is chain-agnostic. A developer can save user profiles of an Ethereum application in Plasma and retrieve them in a smart contract on a different chain. The network connects lightweight clients that are aware of consensus rules of other networks. Practically, a gamer might have game-based items in one chain, and apply them in a game in another chain without incurring the hassle of bridging and custodial services.

Considerate Tokenomics and Stability.

At the time when I consider a crypto project, I consider structure of token supply. The native token of Plasma is XPL, the fixed max supply of which is 10b, and currently, 1.8b circulates. The first three years will not increase supply in the network. Subsequently, the inflation is gradual and will decrease to around 2 per cent annually, and new tokens will reward validators. Part of the fees are also burnt and this can offset the inflation in the long run. This is a balanced design that avoids the dilution of normal users as well as rewarding the validators.

Token Allocation

The XPL supply is divided to the participants through a transparent manner of 10billion. The first partners receive an investment to initiate adoption. Some is allocated to the team and core contributors who have long lock in periods to align their interests to the network. The rest is given to investors and a pool of grants to finance development and work in the community. I like the fact that the project transparently shows these allocations so that everyone can see how tokens are owned. The breakdown is illustrated in the chart below.

Currently, only 18 0.00 per cent of the tokens are in circulation, and thus, the largest portion of supply is locked. The total supply will increase when tokens are unlocked later and therefore, investors need to monitor future unlocks.

Circulating vs Total Supply

It is important to know the distinction between circulating supply and total supply in order to value a token. At this point, both the circulation and total of XPL are 1.8 and 10 billion, respectively. The numbers are compared in the bar chart below. The grey part indicates that there are still tokens locked or reserved, which indicates the potential amount that can be added to the industry with time.

Data Sovereignty and Digital Rights.

The number of articles related to Plasma revolve around tech details or tokenomics. I would like to point out a human aspect: the sovereignty of the digital. In the modern era of technology, having your data and being free to transfer is a fundamental right. Big tech companies archive our information, and determine how it is applied. Even within blockchain, data is usually stored on a single chain and this constrains freedom.

The cross-chain storage of Plasma allows storing the information of a user and transferring it among networks without depending on centralised bridges. It is some kind of a passport to your digital identity. It means that you can go wherever you want in the decentralised world and carry your assets and data with you.

Making Developer Experience Simpler.

Plasma reduces barriers to entry as seen by a builder. Developers do not have to code it separately and put data on a different storage per chain: just write it once and save on Plasma. This saves on maintenance and accelerates innovation. It also develops a common data layer where programs on one chain can communicate with those on another chain, giving rise to new product ideas.

Adoption Trends: Multi-Chain Tools are a Trending Market.

The infrastructure projects are successful when they have demand. The number of users of crypto is on the rise globally, and hundreds of millions of people own online resources. It has become quicker than the conventional mode of payment and there are countries that are leading in this.

The increase in the number of users promotes the need of scalable and flexible infrastructure. With the increase in the use of digital assets, applications will have to store and retrieve data in numerous chains. Plasma occupies the heart of this trend whereby the service they offer increases in value as more people adopt it.

Outside Storage: Possible applications.

The architecture of plasma allows numerous applications in addition to simple file storage.

Decentralized identity can store credentials in Plasma, such that users can demonstrate authenticity across chains without exposing sensitive information. Cross-chain gaming may allow players to own objects or characters in one chain, and utilize them in a different chain. Metadata and collateral records could be stored on a portable format in the stablecoins and DeFi platforms. Decentralized social networks may be operated on several chains with the preservation of user history.

Why I'm Optimistic

There are risks. The supply will be increased with token unlocks, and the competition in decentralized storage is tough. The team should work towards creating a secure and reliable network. Nevertheless, the favourable indicators are high.

Plasma addresses an actual issue that has a definite economic framework and a long-term motivation to do so. Due to the increase in crypto adoption, the demand in cross-chain infrastructure will increase. However, and most importantly, Plasma aligns with my philosophy that the individuals should own and manage their digital lives.

Plasma helps to get us one step closer to an entirely decentralized internet, where individuals have the freedom to act instead of being isolated subsystems. When the implementation fulfils the vision, Plasma would be a cornerstone of the new wave of blockchain usage.

#plasma @Plasma
$XPL

Vanar is not any other blockchain. It is an attempt to build the memory and payments layer of the new generation of digital economies. The network addresses most of the largest problems in web3 by incorporating hybrid consensus, a fixed- fee model, a carbon-neutral design, and AI-native capabilities.

A New Kind of Digital Memory

The majority of blockchain considers data as immutable records. Vanar proposes the use of a neural engine called Neutron, which is an application memory layer. Vanar does not store the heavy data on the blockchain, but instead employs AI to reduce rich content to minuscule but verifiable seeds that exist on-chain. The original information can be reconstructed at the time when it is required, whereas the chain demonstrates the evidence of origin and integrity.

The concept behind the process is simple but effective: the content is stored, summarized with the help of AI, reduced with the help of a special model, and re-expanded at the time of need. This allows games, media platforms, and financial apps to access and manage the rich data without reducing the network speed. It makes the blockchain a memory reference point as opposed to a storage bottleneck.

This is the basis of myNeutron product by Vanar. It also allows individuals to build their own AI agents that do control digital assets, participate in games and offer application-accentuated guidance. Such agents are not just chatbots. They will have continuity and awareness as they can refer to on-chain information and previous interactions.

I would regard myNeutron as an electronic servant. It can recall what you have in your possession, what you do with apps and even act on your behalf. This may over time become agent-based markets where AI agents are involved in trade deals, as well as the management of DeFi positions or organizing entertainment experiences without much human input.

Representing the Ecosystem of Vanar

The ecosystem proposed by Vanar unites a number of parties: users, validators, developers, AI agents, and real-world assets. Chain agents are used by users who engage with AI agents. Validators win the network and get rewards. Applications are developed on an EVM compatible runtime by Vanar, existing Ethereum contracts are imported and Neutron is integrated.

Real estate or carbon credits example The tokenized assets at the periphery of the system interact with the off-chain markets. The outcome is a network in which data, value, and intelligence circulate as opposed to existing in silos.

Equity and Sustainability in the Middle.

Most blockchains purport to be decentralized but end up with power centralization. Vanar does not follow the same path and instead combines Proof-of-Authority and Proof-of- Reputation. During the initial stage, validators which are trusted provide stability and speed. The members of the community may gain the privilege with time to validate basing on reputation, behavior, and participation.

Such a method is pragmatic. It puts security and performance at the forefront and opens governance through maturity of the ecosystem. Vanar does not assume on day one that there is decentralization but remedies it as a process.

The other critical pillar is the fixed-fee model. The orders are completed one at a time and cost a small fixed fee. It lacks bidding wars, unexpected spikes and the necessity to time the transaction. High capacity blocks are generated after every three-second time and this system is applicable in gaming, micro-payments, and live interactions.

The network operates on carbon-free infrastructure and compensates the rest of the emissions. In my case, this is not about marketing, but a practical enablement. Sustainability reduces the opposition of institutions, brands, and regulators who are becoming more concerned with the environment.

Tokenomics Constructed to Coordinate Incentives.

VANRY, the native token of Vanar, is an asset with a limited supply of 2.4 billion. Approximately 50 percent of that supply could be minted at launch in order to move the old ecosystem token in a one to one fashion. The remainder will be discharged gradually over twenty years.

New tokens are issued in an evident priority list: the biggest part is allocated to validators who lock the network, the smaller part will fund the development, and a small amount of tokens will be reserved to community incentives. The big team assignments do not exist, and block rewards decrease in size with time.

I am fond of this design since it links rewards to long-term health. Validators receive money as a reward to keep the security, developers receive sizeable investment to keep building and users are encouraged to contribute. It discourages speculation in the short term and promotes a slow growth.

Connecting the Digital to the Physiological Economy.

Vanar is the offshoot of the Virtua ecosystem, which is why it is so much focused on gaming and digital collectibles. The compatibility of EVM allows developers to port Ethereum apps without significant rewrites, and low fees and fast block times make it possible to use it in games and have a lot of interactions.

In addition to gaming, Vanar is also branding itself as real-world asset infrastructure. It aims at supporting stablecoins and AI based workflows to support tokenised property, commodities, and other regulated assets. Cooperation with conventional payment providers is an indication of agentic payments, where AI agents make compliant payments automatically.

Just envision energy bills paid by AI agents on a continuous basis, or fractional ownership of real-estate under management on chain with minimal overhead. The fact that Vanar is predictable, the fees are low and that it is sustainable makes such ideas less abstract and closer.

A Multi-layered Technology Stack.

The stack by Vanar is made to be modular. Smart contracts are run by a runtime layer. Neutron layer is a layer that deals with AI summarisation and compression. A layer of storage controls the retrieval of data. Cross chain bridges bridge Ethereum and Polygon among others.

Such a stratumatic design is not by chance: Vanar prefers to be middleware of digital experiences, rather than an additional execution chain. Its integration of AI, payments, storage, and interoperability is meant to help enable full application ecosystems and not single use cases.
Growth and Momentum of Investment Ecosystems.
The development of Vanar is in a rhythmic way. There are distinct stages of development in token migration, the launch of AI products, ecosystem tools, and strategic partnerships. The investor interest is heightened to these milestones of delivery, and not speculative hype.

The consistency is what is outstanding. The process of growth is not dramatic. That puts a hype cycle at a minimum but makes foundations. Execution and not promises are followed by capital.

I consider Vanar to have been trying something more than faster blockchain. It is constructing inhabited infrastructure, systems that are recollectionary and deliberate and act. It addresses technical and human issues by integrating AI-based memory, fair consensus, predictable fees, and sustainability.

The asset-controlling AI agents, paying negotiations and experience maintenance into the chain seem to be the logical continuation of Web3. Vanar is too young and there are threats of adoption, governance and competition. However, its emphasis on practicality instead of service hype is what makes it one of the more considered projects in the sector.

When Web3 is supposed to serve the real economies, it must have infrastructure that is boring, intelligent, and stable in the most excellent manner. Vanar is attempting to construct such.

$VANRY #Vanar @Vanar

The common belief held by most blockchains is that being transparent would make markets fair. Theoretically, such an idea is effective, in practical finance it fails quickly. Markets do not collapse due to the concealment of rules, but as a result of leaks of sensitive data. This is why I care about Dusk. It is not intended to turn finance into more of a public, it is intended to turn it into a functional discipline in the real world.

The actual issue: transparency is not an accidental leakage of data.

Transparency has been confused with honesty in crypto. Transparency leaks in the financial markets have an intent. Strategies can be reverse-engineered in case the sizes of trade, timing, counterparties, and flows are visible. This does not only harm traders but renders markets weak. Organizations will not be able to run in a world where all actions are published metadata.

Dusk is approaching privacy in a different way as compared to the traditional privacy coins. It defaults on activity, but permits selective disclosure. Transactions remain confidential, unless the evidence of their correctness is required, and they can be audited by regulators. Such balance is important; regulators desire demonstration and not obscurity.

Why controlled finance should have an alternative blockchain architecture.

Layer 1 blockchains are designed to participate and do experiments freely. Unregulated finance is the reverse. It needs restricted access, accountable visibility, official information in the market, and certain settlement. It is impossible to make additions to these properties later and still not shatter the system.

Dusk has been constructed to be in this environment. Its structure isolates execution, settlement and compliance logic into first-class elements. This allows privacy-sensitive smart contracts to co-exist with audit systems that regulators and institutions can rely on.

That is why the roadmap proposed by Dusk suits the European system of MiCA, European DLT Pilot Regime rather than trends of retail DeFi. It constructs the future of tokenized securities, funds, and debt, which will not exist beyond the law but rather exist within it.

Adoption is not a hurry - and that is no point of weakness.

One of the most frequent misconceptions in crypto is that a slow adoption rate means that the concept will fail. Controlled infrastructure is slow on account. All integrations will need legal inspection, risk analysis, and testing. This is not the growth of viruses, it is structural integration.

Its partnership with controlled institutions like NPEX demonstrates the way Dusk is headed. These are not headline collaborations; they are the moves towards integrating blockchain settlement into the current market processes. This adoption will be sticky in case it succeeds. Switches are not made between rails by the institutions every cycle.

It is in this difference that Dusk stands apart in comparison to narrative-driven chains. It does not have the attention optimization; it has the memorization optimization.

Insurance, not speculative, of systems: token economics.

One more direction Dusk chooses to draw a line is token design. DUSK token is not a meme asset or pure utility gas. It acts as a security budget. Emissions, incentives to be a validator and staking reward long term reliability, not short term opportunism.

The mechanisms of penalties are gentler, like temporary reward exclusion rather than vicious reduction: the philosophy here is not to kill operator capital, but to deter bad behaviour. This is in line with the real management of infrastructure. What you want are systems which fail gracefully and not catastrophically.

The trade‑off is clear. Milder punishments will have fewer fear-based punishments which will decrease the validator ecosystem, which is precisely what regulated markets need.

The actual danger: it is not ideas, it is execution.

The vision of Dusk is logical, yet the dangers are a reality. The biggest one is execution. Construction of infrastructure that is compliant is costly, time-consuming, and relationship-based. Provided that partnerships fail to be converted into actual issuance and trading volume, the technology by itself will not suffice.

There is also a timing risk. Speculation is mostly faster priced in markets than in infrastructure. The value of Dusk might not be apparent in bullish cycles where retail stories are prevalent. Its applicability is not until the institutions require privacy and accountability.

The reason why this approach is relevant.

Even with such dangers, I feel that Dusk is addressing the right problem. Assuming tokenized assets scale, they will not coexist on chains that spurt information or are unregulated. On them, they will survive on a system of privacy, auditability, and settlement discipline.

Dusk is not creating a chain of vibe. It is developing financial plumbing. Such infrastructure might seem unimpressive in the short term but once it functions, it will be underpinning.

It will not be the most vocal networks to dominate the future of regulated on-chain finance. It will be one of the institutions that the regulators scrutinize, markets depend on, and trust in there quietly, reliably, and over a very long period.

#Dusk @Dusk
$DUSK

My introduction to decentralized data: Why data counts

In a digital era, we depend on the services of a handful of massive technology corporations which manage files that power applications, games, and AI systems. Such servers are centralized, convenient, but also dangerous: censorship, points of failure and obscurity about the control of our data. When I learned about Web3 and AI, I understood that blockchains do not support large "blob" files such as videos and datasets. Saving such would mean that each validator would need to replicate the file numerous times which is costly. Storage projects that are decentralized including IPFS employ full replication, resulting in slowness in retrieval and low programmability. I posed a question as to whether we could have a decentralized, secure, affordable and programmable storage layer.

The drawback of conventional data storage and blockchain data.
It is not in vain to understand the trade-offs that are present. Blockchain networks are based on consensus and small state transitions and large files are usually stored on all validators (replication factor of 100 or higher). Blobs are well managed in centralized clouds, such as Amazon S3 but result in high costs, single points of failure and censorship. Decentralized file networks like Filecoin and Arweave implement either full replication or basic erasure coding, either increasing overhead or reducing recovery speed. Most treat data are taken to be very fixed: you upload it, and later read it, and there are no convenient ways to program interactions. This static model cannot work with Web3 and AI where files have to be verified, monetised, or removed. The ideal protocol would reduce the cost of replication, ensure the data remain available despite the failure of nodes, allow developers to automate data management and grant their owners access control.
What is Walrus?
Walrus is a decentralized data-availability and storage protocol based on Sui developed by Mysten labs. It allows applications to publish, read, and program large binary files (blobs) using Move smart contracts, and make storage an interactive resource. The protocol is chain-agnostic: Walrus can be used with Solana, Ethereum, or any other chain by using its SDKs and developer tools to communicate with apps via Sui. The protocol is managed by the Walrus Foundation, which has raised $140 million in March 2025 as investors, including Standard Crypto but also Electric Capital, Franklin Templeton Digital Assets and others. The money is used to expand the platform and the mainnet was released on 27 March 2025.
I consider Walrus to be the data layer of the AI era. It seeks to render the information in the world trustworthy, useful and manageable- programmable assets of information that were originally passive files. Whereas other solutions provide an opportunity to upload and download, Walrus enables data and storage ownership, transferability, and interactivity through smart contracts. This has introduced new applications like data market places, AI agent back ends, on-chain websites and rich-media NFTs.
How Walrus works: a simple explanation of the technology.

Red Stuff and erasure coding

Walrus is about a new erasure-coding scheme known as Red Stuff. Such traditional coding as ReedSolomon is used to divide a file into fragments in such a way that any subset of them can be used to restore the original file but has difficulty dealing with node churn and expensive recovery. Red Stuff stores data at a two dimensional level with a replication factor of approximately 4.5x which is significantly lower than a full replication. It facilitates self-cure healing: in order to fix lost fragments, you can just the bandwidth that is equal to the lost data, and not the entire file. It further gives storage complications which discourage attackers to use network delays to counterfeit evidence. These properties allow Walrus to recover a file in case up to two-thirds of storage nodes fail or become malicious.

Proved-of-stake and epochs, which are delegated.

Walrus provides the network with delegated proof-of-stake (DPoS). The storage nodes will compete to be allocated stake by token holders; depending on their delegated stake, they will be included in the committee where the data is stored and served by the storage node during an epoch. At the end of every epoch, storage and retrieval rewards are given to nodes and stakers. Users do not require operating nodes, they can trade WAL tokens to trusted operators and receive rewards. Walrus will introduce slashing, whereby unscrupulous or underperforming nodes are deprived of some of their stake. Delegated staking is economically flexible and security-assuring. Any change of stake in short term is penalized, and this discourages short term attacks and promotes long term participation.

Sui integration and hard-disk storage.

Walrus uses the Sui blockchain as a control plane instead of storing metadata off-chain. Storage space and blobs are converted into Sui objects which are capable of ownership, division, combination, and transfer. The Walrus client can be configured to upload the data which is then split up into slivers which are distributed to storage nodes. There is a proof-of-availability (PoA) certificate that is placed on Sui, which confirms that the data is stored and accessible. Since these objects are stored on-chain, Move contracts can check the availability of a blob, renew it, or destroy it as long as it is no longer required. This deletion option is what makes Walrus unique compared to other protocols such as Arweave, that do not provide deletion. Here, programmability can bridge the gap between data and DeFi: you can create a payment on renewal, or create pay-per-view content, or tokenize data rights.

The WAL token: utility, distribution and economics.

The domestic currency of Walrus is WAL. It is limited to 5 billion supply of tokens and 1.25billion initial supply. It is estimated that approximately 1.57billion WAL are currently in circulation and the price is approximately $0.12/ token with a market cap of approximately 190million. WAL carries out three fundamental roles:

1. Cost: WAL charges users to store data. Payment to storage nodes and stakers is distributed in time, and hence storage costs remain constant regardless of token price fluctuations. Early use Walrus provides subsidies on early use by setting 10% of the supply of tokens in user subsidies, maintaining the storage cost at competitive levels during the bootstrapping of the network.

2. Security: WAL is used in delegation staking by means of storage node election. Nodes and delegators are remunerated in terms of performance, and slashing rewards non-performing or malicious nodes. This model of stake encourages decentralization whereby the stake is spread among a large number of operators.

3. Governance: The WAL holders participate in the voting on protocol parameters, including penalty rates. The nodes jointly determine the level of slashing and other charges which are determined based on their stake. Being a WAL holder, you are able to influence the economics of the protocol.

Token distribution

Walrus is community‑driven. More than 60% of all the WAL tokens are distributed in the community by airdrops, subsidies and Community Reserve. The distribution channel is as follows:

WAL is deflationary through two burning mechanisms. To start with, short-term stake shift fees are partly burnt. Second, reducing fines on the staking of poorly-performing nodes is also partially incinerated. Burning decreases in the long run supply and balances incentives to participate in the long term.

Governance and decentralization: retaining power decentralized.

There is a paradox of scale in decentralized networks: as they increase in size, stake is likely to get concentrated in a small number of large operators. Walrus manages this by making a number of design decisions. The holders of tokens give instructions to independent storage nodes, distributing ownership among a large number of operators and making it impossible to have a single party in charge of the data. Nodes are rewarded according to verifiable uptime and reliability and not their size, allowing small nodes to compete. Bad performance implies the slashing of stake, which discourages centralization. Speed of stake traveling is punished, and coordinated stake movement during voting or offensive. Distribution of governance-related decisions like the fee or reward parameter adjustment is a communal decision of the token holders, which offers communal control. The network is decentralized with this design because more users and data are added.

Applicability in the real world: AI to esports.

Walrus is no longer theoretical, but in practical use in a wide variety of industries:

1. AI and data marketplaces: Walrus holds massive amounts of data, which the AI models can be trained on, with verifiable, traceable data. Each blob has a proof-of-availability certificate on Sui, and thus developers are assured by the provenance of training data. Access control and confidentiality is also incorporated in the platform through encryption services such as Seal.
2. Web3 Content and media: Walrus Sites can take the place of decentralized websites, and videos or music can be stored as programmable objects by their creators. Walrus considers storage as a resource, which can be monetized with access or ownership transfer to creators.
3. NFTs and DeFi: NFTs frequently store metadata off-chain Walrus will make the real data available and tamper-resistant. Smart contracts are able to check the availability of data prior to conducting transactions. Walrus is used in DeFi to make roll-ups and on-chain applications, which require large state updates, available.
4. Enterprise backup and gaming: Firms create geographical redundancy by backing up vital files. In January 2026, esports powerhouse Team Liquid told Walrus that it was transferring 250TB of match footage and brand content to Walrus. The relocation gets rid of single points of failure, simplified access to data across its global teams, and made the archive future-proof. The programmable storage allows the Team Liquid to build new experiences and monetization opportunities in the field of fans by Walrus. Migration software like AI meta-tagging is one of the features that enhance search and access and is facilitated by partner Zarklab.
Partnerships and ecosystem
Walrus Foundation has developed a sound ecosystem around its protocol. The key investors are Standard Cryptos, a16z crypto, Electric Capital, and Franklin Templeton Digital assets. The project has collaborated with IO.net - an AI training GPU network, Seal to access control and privacy, Tusky to decentralized compute, Unchained to storage front-ends, and Pudgy Penguins - an NFT brand among many others. These partnerships demonstrate the scope of the potential of Walrus that includes AI infrastructure, NFTs, gaming as well as enterprise storage.
The comparison between Walrus and other storage solutions.
In my research, I equated Walrus to such well-known decentralized storage networks as Filecoin and Arweave. Chainflow analysis explains the reason behind why Walrus is unique:
- Reduced replication cost: Walrus erasure codes have a replication factor of approximately 45 times, compared to Filecoin using full replication and potentially much greater duplication. This reduces overhead and makes Walrus less expensive and fault tolerant.
- Incremental recovery: It is possible to reconstruct the data in the case when the missing slivers are up to two-thirds of the data, and the reconstruction process consumes as little bandwidth as the missing information. The speed at which filecoin can be retrieved is determined by the availability of miners and the permanence of Arweave is more important than speed.
- Deletability: Walrus enables the data owners to destroy or edit blobs using smart contracts, whilst Arweave does not have that feature at all.
- Programmability: Walrus allows storing content and data as Sui objects, allowing users to automate renewals, monetize content, and incorporate data into DeFi. Filecoin and Arweave are file systems that are not programmable, with data being relatively fixed.
- Equitable and confidential agreement: Determined slashing proof-of-stake with penalty charges promotes decentralization and accountability. The economic model created by Walrus is one that encourages efficiency and does not allow the concentration of stakeholders.
I believe that Walrus is not in direct competition with Filecoin or Arweave, but they complement one another with a high-performance layer of dynamic, programmable data-storing when they provide archival or immutable storage.
Threats, prevailing market environment, and my personal perspective.
No project is risk‑free.
The token WAL has been fluctuating: it had reached an all-time high of $0.8742 on 27 March 2025, but then sank to 0.07815 on 10 October 2025 and on January 2026 it is at an approximate of 0.12. Even though the mechanisms of burning and staking rewards may cause deflationary pressure, the token holders ought to wait and expect the changes in the market. Execution risk is also there: Walrus roadmap involves slashing, cross-chain integrations and more decentralization. Adoption may be slowed down by delays.

Nevertheless, in my opinion the data economy will become one of the trends of the forthcoming decade. Generative AI, metaverse platforms, decentralized social networks, on-chain gaming, etc, all rely on data storage and retrieval of large files. Walrus satisfies this requirement by technical innovations (Red Stuff), a programmable architecture, and a community-based economic model. The fact that AI developers and esports organizations are real-world users proves that it is not all hype. As a part of it, I will be thrilled to see the way Walrus and its ecosystem will develop. I will also leverage the network in my personal projects and participate in governance and not forget that it is not investment advice.

Conclusion

Walrus in a word reinvents the concept of data storage by viewing data storage as a programmable, interactive resource. It features advanced erasure coding to minimize the replication cost, introduces a delegated proof-of-stake to make the network secure and makes the smart contracts automation and deletion-friendly and allocates power with community-based tokenomics, which are built on the Sui blockchain. With its strategic collaborations, practical implementation, and effective investor support, Walrus is becoming one of the components of Web3 and AI infrastructure. Being a person who has a strong interest in data and decentralized technology, I view Walrus as a source of the new generation of applications, rather than another crypto project.

#Walrus @Walrus 🦭/acc
$WAL