ABD ELHAK RECHACH
Atvērts tirdzniecības darījums
Tirgo bieži
2.4 gadi
2 Seko
20 Sekotāji
38 Patika
0 Kopīgots
Visi
Cenu piedāvājumi
PINNED
Tulkot
اضغط هنا
فرصة ربح خمسة عملات من bmt حقيقي وكثير من الناس ربحو منها$BNB
فرصة ربح خمسة عملات من bmt حقيقي وكثير من الناس ربحو منها$BNB
PINNED
Tulkot
الرابط الأول الدخل الرابط claim reward
الرابط الثاني ادخل الرابط claim reward
الرابط الثالث ادخل الرابط claim reward
الرابط الرابع ادخل الرابط claim reward
جميع عروض binance ادخل الروابط للمشاركة فيها للحصول على مكافآت
الرابط الثاني ادخل الرابط claim reward
الرابط الثالث ادخل الرابط claim reward
الرابط الرابع ادخل الرابط claim reward
جميع عروض binance ادخل الروابط للمشاركة فيها للحصول على مكافآت
Tulkot
مستحيل لأنه عدد عملات bttc في العالم تقدر ب 990 ترليون عملة في العالم ولو صار سعرها دولار رح يصير تضخم كبير بالعملة الا اذا صار في حرق عملات لكن لازم يكون حرق نسبة تفوق السحاب
🤯 Vai $BTTC var radīt nākamo miljardiera stāstu? 💰🚀
Padomā uz mirkli: kas notiktu, ja tu investētu tikai 10 dolārus, kamēr $BTTC cena svārstās ap $0.00000051? 👀
Tas nozīmē, ka tev piederētu aptuveni 19,6 miljoni BTTC gabalu tavā makā! 🤑
Un tagad, iedomājies, kā šī burvju vērtība varētu mainīties, ja cena pārvietojas: 👇
🌕 pie $0.001: tavi līdzekļi kļūst par $19,607 (aptuveni 73,500 Saūda Arābijas riālu vai līdzvērtīgu)!
💎 pie $0.01: palielinās līdz $196,078!
⚡ pie $0.10: lec uz $1.96 miljoniem!
🏆 pie $1.00: sasniedz milzīgu lēcienu līdz $19.6 miljoniem! 🤯💵
Šī ir patiesā ticības spēks #BTTC #vienkārši viens cenu lēciens var mainīt tavu dzīvi un radīt brīnumus.
Jautājums tev: vai tu esi gatavs šai ceļojumam? Vai tu tici, ka $BTTC ir lielais stāsts, ko mēs stāstīsim? Dalies ar savu entuziasma viedokli! 💭👇
Padomā uz mirkli: kas notiktu, ja tu investētu tikai 10 dolārus, kamēr $BTTC cena svārstās ap $0.00000051? 👀
Tas nozīmē, ka tev piederētu aptuveni 19,6 miljoni BTTC gabalu tavā makā! 🤑
Un tagad, iedomājies, kā šī burvju vērtība varētu mainīties, ja cena pārvietojas: 👇
🌕 pie $0.001: tavi līdzekļi kļūst par $19,607 (aptuveni 73,500 Saūda Arābijas riālu vai līdzvērtīgu)!
💎 pie $0.01: palielinās līdz $196,078!
⚡ pie $0.10: lec uz $1.96 miljoniem!
🏆 pie $1.00: sasniedz milzīgu lēcienu līdz $19.6 miljoniem! 🤯💵
Šī ir patiesā ticības spēks #BTTC #vienkārši viens cenu lēciens var mainīt tavu dzīvi un radīt brīnumus.
Jautājums tev: vai tu esi gatavs šai ceļojumam? Vai tu tici, ka $BTTC ir lielais stāsts, ko mēs stāstīsim? Dalies ar savu entuziasma viedokli! 💭👇
Tulkot
open and win
#MarketPullback #FedRateCutExpectations #Ripple1BXRPReserve #BinanceHODLerENSO #BNBBreaksATH $BNB
#MarketPullback #FedRateCutExpectations #Ripple1BXRPReserve #BinanceHODLerENSO #BNBBreaksATH $BNB
Tulkot
Mans 30 dienu PZA
2025-09-15~2025-10-14
-$0,18
-39.39%
Tulkot
اغتنم الفرصة
لعبة 1 دولار فرصة الفوز ب 850 usdt #BinanceHODLerOPEN #USNonFarmPayrollReport $BNB
{spot}(BNBUSDT)
{spot}(BNBUSDT)
Tulkot
ادخل الرابط لفرصة الحصول على 5 usdt
Tulkot
#BinanceTurns8 انضم إلينا في احتفال #BinanceTurns8 واربح حصّةً مما يصل إلى 888,888$ من BNB! https://www.binance.com/activity/binance-turns-8?ref=GRO_19600_EQHPF
Tulkot
#BinanceTurns8 انضم إلينا في احتفال #BinanceTurns8 واربح حصّةً مما يصل إلى 888,888$ من BNB! https://www.binance.com/activity/binance-turns-8?ref=GRO_19600_EQHPF
Tulkot
استكشف مزيج حافظتي الاستثمارية. تابعني لترى كيف استثمر
!CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.
!CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.
Skatīt oriģinālu
$BTC
CoinDesk ir apbalvots mediju izdevums, kas aptver kriptovalūtu nozari. Tās žurnālisti ievēro stingru redakcionālo politiku. CoinDesk ir pieņēmusi principus, kas vērsti uz publikāciju integritātes, redakcionālās neatkarības un neobjektivitātes nodrošināšanu. CoinDesk ir daļa no Bullish grupas, kas pieder un iegulda digitālā aktīvu uzņēmumos un digitālajos aktīvos. CoinDesk darbinieki, tostarp žurnālisti, var saņemt Bullish grupas kapitāla balstītu atlīdzību. Bullish tika inkubēta tehnoloģiju investora Block.one.
CoinDesk ir apbalvots mediju izdevums, kas aptver kriptovalūtu nozari. Tās žurnālisti ievēro stingru redakcionālo politiku. CoinDesk ir pieņēmusi principus, kas vērsti uz publikāciju integritātes, redakcionālās neatkarības un neobjektivitātes nodrošināšanu. CoinDesk ir daļa no Bullish grupas, kas pieder un iegulda digitālā aktīvu uzņēmumos un digitālajos aktīvos. CoinDesk darbinieki, tostarp žurnālisti, var saņemt Bullish grupas kapitāla balstītu atlīdzību. Bullish tika inkubēta tehnoloģiju investora Block.one.
Tulkot
#ScalpingStrategy #USNationalDebt
CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.
CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.
Mans 30 dienu PZA
2025-05-24~2025-06-22
+$0,72
+2214.89%
Tulkot
#ScalpingStrategy
CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.
CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.
Tulkot
$BTC
Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as
trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for
most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model.
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot
avoid mediating disputes. The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the
minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions,
and there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to make non-reversible payments for nonreversible services. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads. Merchants must
be wary of their customers, hassling them for more information than they would otherwise need.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable. These costs and payment uncertainties
can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments
over a communications channel without a trusted party
Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as
trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for
most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model.
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot
avoid mediating disputes. The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the
minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions,
and there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to make non-reversible payments for nonreversible services. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads. Merchants must
be wary of their customers, hassling them for more information than they would otherwise need.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable. These costs and payment uncertainties
can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments
over a communications channel without a trusted party
Tulkot
#USNationalDebt
Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as
trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for
most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model.
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot
avoid mediating disputes. The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the
minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions,
and there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to make non-reversible payments for nonreversible services. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads. Merchants must
be wary of their customers, hassling them for more information than they would otherwise need.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable. These costs and payment uncertainties
can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments
over a communications channel without a trusted party
Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as
trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for
most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model.
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot
avoid mediating disputes. The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the
minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions,
and there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to make non-reversible payments for nonreversible services. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads. Merchants must
be wary of their customers, hassling them for more information than they would otherwise need.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable. These costs and payment uncertainties
can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments
over a communications channel without a trusted party
Mans 30 dienu PZA
2025-05-23~2025-06-21
+$0,7
+2196.23%
Tulkot
استكشف مزيج حافظتي الاستثمارية. تابعني لترى كيف استثمر!
Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as
trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for
most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model.
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot
avoid mediating disputes. The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the
minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions,
and there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to make non-reversible payments for nonreversible services. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads. Merchants must
be wary of their customers, hassling them for more information than they would otherwise need.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable. These costs and payment uncertainties
can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments
over a communications channel without a trusted party
Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as
trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for
most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model.
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot
avoid mediating disputes. The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the
minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions,
and there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to make non-reversible payments for nonreversible services. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads. Merchants must
be wary of their customers, hassling them for more information than they would otherwise need.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable. These costs and payment uncertainties
can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments
over a communications channel without a trusted party
Tulkot
Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as
trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for
most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model.
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot
avoid mediating disputes. The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the
minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions,
and there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to make non-reversible payments for nonreversible services. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads. Merchants must
be wary of their customers, hassling them for more information than they would otherwise need.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable. These costs and payment uncertainties
can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments
over a communications channel without a trusted party
trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for
most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model.
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot
avoid mediating disputes. The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the
minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions,
and there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to make non-reversible payments for nonreversible services. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads. Merchants must
be wary of their customers, hassling them for more information than they would otherwise need.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable. These costs and payment uncertainties
can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments
over a communications channel without a trusted party
Tulkot
#USNationalDebt
Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as
trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for
most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model.
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot
avoid mediating disputes. The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the
minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions,
and there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to make non-reversible payments for nonreversible services. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads. Merchants must
be wary of their customers, hassling them for more information than they would otherwise need.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable. These costs and payment uncertainties
can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments
over a communications channel without a trusted party
Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as
trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for
most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model.
Completely non-reversible transactions are not really possible, since financial institutions cannot
avoid mediating disputes. The cost of mediation increases transaction costs, limiting the
minimum practical transaction size and cutting off the possibility for small casual transactions,
and there is a broader cost in the loss of ability to make non-reversible payments for nonreversible services. With the possibility of reversal, the need for trust spreads. Merchants must
be wary of their customers, hassling them for more information than they would otherwise need.
A certain percentage of fraud is accepted as unavoidable. These costs and payment uncertainties
can be avoided in person by using physical currency, but no mechanism exists to make payments
over a communications channel without a trusted party
Tulkot
#XSuperApp
Despite the growing literature on Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, we know relatively little about who are involved in trading, transacting and using these assets and how they behave. Examining millions of Bitcoin transaction records, we show that less than 1% of Bitcoin users contribute to more than 95% of the market volumes. These ‘whales’ are often associated with strategic trading/transaction volumes, market reactions and timing patterns. Using K-means clustering on a comprehensive transaction dataset, we establish a typology of traders by learning their trading exchange patterns, strategies and impact risk and market microstructure. Our approach ‘learns’ and identifies five distinct groups or types of Bitcoin users, which are somewhat, though not entirely, comparable to popular categorisations used in conventional market such as fundamental, technical, retail and institutional traders as well as market makers. Four of these groups present distinguishable trading patterns with a strong impact on liquidity provision and trading signals.
Despite the growing literature on Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, we know relatively little about who are involved in trading, transacting and using these assets and how they behave. Examining millions of Bitcoin transaction records, we show that less than 1% of Bitcoin users contribute to more than 95% of the market volumes. These ‘whales’ are often associated with strategic trading/transaction volumes, market reactions and timing patterns. Using K-means clustering on a comprehensive transaction dataset, we establish a typology of traders by learning their trading exchange patterns, strategies and impact risk and market microstructure. Our approach ‘learns’ and identifies five distinct groups or types of Bitcoin users, which are somewhat, though not entirely, comparable to popular categorisations used in conventional market such as fundamental, technical, retail and institutional traders as well as market makers. Four of these groups present distinguishable trading patterns with a strong impact on liquidity provision and trading signals.
Pieraksties, lai skatītu citu saturu