Binance Square

MragB

13 Seko
37 Sekotāji
43 Patika
0 Kopīgots
Publikācijas
·
--
Over $1.04 Billion wiped from the maps. ​The Long Squeeze: A staggering $923 Million of these were Long positions. The market effectively "punished" over-leveraged buyers as Bitcoin slid below the crucial $85,000 mark. ​Casualties: More than 400,000 traders saw their accounts liquidated. ​Biggest Hitters: Bitcoin ($BTC): ~$192M liquidated as it touched a local low of $83,240. ​Ethereum ($ETH): ~$189M liquidated, struggling to hold the $2,800 support. ​Altcoins: Solana ($SOL) and XRP saw sharp 7%+ drops, leading to a domino effect across mid-cap assets. Watch the $85,500 level for BTC. If we reclaim and hold this within 48 hours, the liquidation was likely just a "healthy" clearing of excess leverage. If we stay below, expect a retest of the $80,000 psychological floor. Expect sideways price action as spot buyers accumulate and the "weak hands" exit the market. Avoid high leverage in the next few days. Let the market find its new floor first.
Over $1.04 Billion wiped from the maps.
​The Long Squeeze: A staggering $923 Million of these were Long positions. The market effectively "punished" over-leveraged buyers as Bitcoin slid below the crucial $85,000 mark.
​Casualties: More than 400,000 traders saw their accounts liquidated.
​Biggest Hitters:
Bitcoin ($BTC): ~$192M liquidated as it touched a local low of $83,240.
​Ethereum ($ETH): ~$189M liquidated, struggling to hold the $2,800 support.
​Altcoins: Solana ($SOL) and XRP saw sharp 7%+ drops, leading to a domino effect across mid-cap assets.

Watch the $85,500 level for BTC. If we reclaim and hold this within 48 hours, the liquidation was likely just a "healthy" clearing of excess leverage. If we stay below, expect a retest of the $80,000 psychological floor.

Expect sideways price action as spot buyers accumulate and the "weak hands" exit the market.

Avoid high leverage in the next few days. Let the market find its new floor first.
·
--
Bitcoin is currently testing a psychological boundary that coincides with the 200-day moving average. If this breaks, we could see another wave of liquidations ranging from 10-15%. ​Most currencies are in "oversold" territory, which historically suggests that a short-term recovery is near.
Bitcoin is currently testing a psychological boundary that coincides with the 200-day moving average. If this breaks, we could see another wave of liquidations ranging from 10-15%.
​Most currencies are in "oversold" territory, which historically suggests that a short-term recovery is near.
·
--
How to approach this Bear trend ​Most professional traders avoid "going all-in" at once during a sharp drop. Instead, they use DCA (Dollar Cost Averaging); ​Stage 1: Invest 25-30% of your available cash now to secure a position. ​Stage 2: Keep the rest in reserve. If Bitcoin drops to the $80k–$82k range, buy more. ​Stage 3: If the market starts recovering and breaks back above $95,000, deploy the remaining capital to ride the momentum. ​Summary ​Yes, this is an opportunity, but only if your time horizon is at least 6–12 months. If you are looking for a "quick flip" in the next 48 hours, the risk of getting caught in a further leg down is very real.
How to approach this Bear trend

​Most professional traders avoid "going all-in" at once during a sharp drop. Instead, they use DCA (Dollar Cost Averaging);

​Stage 1: Invest 25-30% of your available cash now to secure a position.

​Stage 2: Keep the rest in reserve. If Bitcoin drops to the $80k–$82k range, buy more.

​Stage 3: If the market starts recovering and breaks back above $95,000, deploy the remaining capital to ride the momentum.

​Summary
​Yes, this is an opportunity, but only if your time horizon is at least 6–12 months. If you are looking for a "quick flip" in the next 48 hours, the risk of getting caught in a further leg down is very real.
·
--
Pozitīvs
Kāpēc $NEAR ir vairāk nekā tikai 'Vēl viens L1' (un kāpēc es to vēroju 2026) Sveiki visiem, vai esat pamanījuši, kā NEAR protokols klusi būvē, kamēr visi pārējie skrien pakaļ memecoiniem? Ja meklējat projektu, kas apvieno AI un blokķēdi tādā veidā, kas patiešām darbojas, $NEAR pašlaik ir šo stāstu priekšgalā. Šeit ir daži iemesli, kāpēc es domāju, ka tas ir viens no spēcīgākajiem 'likmēm' šogad: AI nav tikai modes vārds: Atšķirībā no daudziem, kas vienkārši uzliek "AI" uz sava nosaukuma, NEAR ir kļuvis par mājvietu kaut kam, ko sauc par Lietotāju Piederīgu AI. Viņu uzmanība uz privātu intelektu un aģentiem, kas var autonomi veikt darījumus jūsu vārdā, ir 10/10 koncepts. NEARCON 2026 tieši apstiprināja, ka viņi ieguldīs autonomajos aģentos. Chain Abstraction: Tas ir īstais "spēles maiņas" elements. Viņu mērķis ir panākt, lai lietotājs pat nepamanītu, ka viņš izmanto blokķēdi. Vairs nav jāsaskaras ar tiltiem un gāzes maksām pie 5 dažādām tīklām – NEAR to pārvalda fonā, izmantojot viņu Nodomi. Tehniskā aina: Pašreiz mēs esam ap $1.50, un analītiķi no Binance Price Prediction redz potenciālu atgūšanai uz $2.10 - $2.35 īstermiņā, ja mēs pārtraucam galvenās pretestības līmeņus. Ilgtermiņā? Ņemot vērā, ka viņi samazināja tokena inflāciju, izmantojot savu Halving Upgrade, piedāvājums kļūst saspringtāks, jo tīkls aug. #NEAR
Kāpēc $NEAR ir vairāk nekā tikai 'Vēl viens L1' (un kāpēc es to vēroju 2026)

Sveiki visiem, vai esat pamanījuši, kā NEAR protokols klusi būvē, kamēr visi pārējie skrien pakaļ memecoiniem? Ja meklējat projektu, kas apvieno AI un blokķēdi tādā veidā, kas patiešām darbojas, $NEAR pašlaik ir šo stāstu priekšgalā.

Šeit ir daži iemesli, kāpēc es domāju, ka tas ir viens no spēcīgākajiem 'likmēm' šogad:

AI nav tikai modes vārds: Atšķirībā no daudziem, kas vienkārši uzliek "AI" uz sava nosaukuma, NEAR ir kļuvis par mājvietu kaut kam, ko sauc par Lietotāju Piederīgu AI. Viņu uzmanība uz privātu intelektu un aģentiem, kas var autonomi veikt darījumus jūsu vārdā, ir 10/10 koncepts. NEARCON 2026 tieši apstiprināja, ka viņi ieguldīs autonomajos aģentos.

Chain Abstraction: Tas ir īstais "spēles maiņas" elements. Viņu mērķis ir panākt, lai lietotājs pat nepamanītu, ka viņš izmanto blokķēdi. Vairs nav jāsaskaras ar tiltiem un gāzes maksām pie 5 dažādām tīklām – NEAR to pārvalda fonā, izmantojot viņu Nodomi.

Tehniskā aina: Pašreiz mēs esam ap $1.50, un analītiķi no Binance Price Prediction redz potenciālu atgūšanai uz $2.10 - $2.35 īstermiņā, ja mēs pārtraucam galvenās pretestības līmeņus. Ilgtermiņā? Ņemot vērā, ka viņi samazināja tokena inflāciju, izmantojot savu Halving Upgrade, piedāvājums kļūst saspringtāks, jo tīkls aug.

#NEAR
·
--
Is the Weakening Dollar the Ultimate Fuel for Bitcoin? We are seeing some serious moves in the DXY (Dollar Index) lately. With the dollar hitting multi-year lows due to fiscal concerns and shifting Fed policies, everyone is asking: What does this mean for our stablecoins and the broader market? Here’s the breakdown: - Purchasing Power: Since stablecoins like $USDC and $USDT are pegged 1:1 to the USD, their global purchasing power drops right along with the dollar. - The Inverse Correlation: Historically, when the Dollar weakens, "hard assets" like $BTC tend to soar. Investors look for a hedge against fiat devaluation, and Bitcoin is the "cleanest shirt in the laundry." - Alternative Stablecoins: Due to the weakening dollar, there's a growing interest in stablecoins pegged to other currencies (such as the Euro) or commodities (Gold, e.g., $PAXG or $XAUT) to preserve asset value. Are you keeping your profits in stables, or are you rotating back into $BTC  and $ETH  to ride the dollar’s decline? #Stablecoins #Bitcoin #CryptoMarket #PAXG #XAUT
Is the Weakening Dollar the Ultimate Fuel for Bitcoin?

We are seeing some serious moves in the DXY (Dollar Index) lately. With the dollar hitting multi-year lows due to fiscal concerns and shifting Fed policies, everyone is asking: What does this mean for our stablecoins and the broader market?

Here’s the breakdown:

- Purchasing Power: Since stablecoins like $USDC and $USDT are pegged 1:1 to the USD, their global purchasing power drops right along with the dollar.

- The Inverse Correlation: Historically, when the Dollar weakens, "hard assets" like $BTC  tend to soar. Investors look for a hedge against fiat devaluation, and Bitcoin is the "cleanest shirt in the laundry."

- Alternative Stablecoins: Due to the weakening dollar, there's a growing interest in stablecoins pegged to other currencies (such as the Euro) or commodities (Gold, e.g., $PAXG or $XAUT) to preserve asset value.

Are you keeping your profits in stables, or are you rotating back into $BTC  and $ETH  to ride the dollar’s decline?

#Stablecoins #Bitcoin #CryptoMarket #PAXG #XAUT
·
--
$FET šodien: Vai AI stāsts atdziest? AI sektors nesen piedzīvoja kādu rotāciju, ar $FET kritumu apmēram 8% pagājušajā nedēļā, un šobrīd tā tirdzniecība ir ap $0.227 USD. Izskatās, ka ap $0.23 pretestības zonu notiek kāda peļņas gūšana. Bet šeit ir lieta: Fetch.ai nesen laida klajā FetchCoder V2, jaunu AI kodēšanas asistentu 28. janvārī, kas ir solīgs pamata atjauninājums. Pats projekts ir pozicionēts kā ilgtermiņa AI līderis, tāpēc īstermiņa kritumi varētu būt veselīgi. Vai mēs konsolidējamies pirms nākamā kāpuma, vai tuvojas dziļāka korekcija? Kāda ir tava darbība šodien? #FET #FetchAI #Aİ #CryptoNews #BinanceSquare
$FET šodien: Vai AI stāsts atdziest?
AI sektors nesen piedzīvoja kādu rotāciju, ar $FET kritumu apmēram 8% pagājušajā nedēļā, un šobrīd tā tirdzniecība ir ap $0.227 USD. Izskatās, ka ap $0.23 pretestības zonu notiek kāda peļņas gūšana.
Bet šeit ir lieta: Fetch.ai nesen laida klajā FetchCoder V2, jaunu AI kodēšanas asistentu 28. janvārī, kas ir solīgs pamata atjauninājums. Pats projekts ir pozicionēts kā ilgtermiņa AI līderis, tāpēc īstermiņa kritumi varētu būt veselīgi.

Vai mēs konsolidējamies pirms nākamā kāpuma, vai tuvojas dziļāka korekcija? Kāda ir tava darbība šodien?

#FET #FetchAI #Aİ #CryptoNews #BinanceSquare
·
--
·
--
Why Jefferies’ Christopher Wood Dropped Bitcoin: A Deeper Look Christopher Wood, Global Head of Equity Strategy at Jefferies and author of the influential Greed & Fear newsletter, has completely removed Bitcoin from his model portfolio, ending a position that previously accounted for roughly 5–10% of allocation. This was not a short-term market call. It was a structural, long-term decision. The Core Concern: Quantum Computing Wood’s main argument centers on the future risk posed by cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs). Bitcoin’s security relies on elliptic-curve cryptography, which is currently safe against classical computers. However, sufficiently powerful quantum computers could theoretically derive private keys from public keys, potentially allowing attackers to steal funds. Some estimates suggest that up to ~10 million BTC (close to 50% of total supply) could be vulnerable in such a scenario—particularly coins held in older or exposed addresses. Important Context This is not a present-day threat. Quantum computers capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography do not currently exist. The risk is theoretical and long-term, but Wood argues it challenges Bitcoin’s narrative as a permanent store of value. While Bitcoin developers have discussed quantum-resistant upgrades, no migration has yet occurred. Portfolio Shift Instead of Bitcoin, Wood has reallocated capital into: Physical gold Gold mining equities This reflects his view that traditional hard assets have less technological tail risk over multi-decade horizons. Bottom Line Wood’s move does not mean Bitcoin is about to fail. It highlights a growing institutional debate: Can Bitcoin adapt fast enough if quantum computing advances faster than expected? For now, the threat is hypothetical—but for long-term allocators, even low-probability existential risks matter.
Why Jefferies’ Christopher Wood Dropped Bitcoin: A Deeper Look

Christopher Wood, Global Head of Equity Strategy at Jefferies and author of the influential Greed & Fear newsletter, has completely removed Bitcoin from his model portfolio, ending a position that previously accounted for roughly 5–10% of allocation.
This was not a short-term market call. It was a structural, long-term decision.

The Core Concern: Quantum Computing
Wood’s main argument centers on the future risk posed by cryptographically relevant quantum computers (CRQCs).
Bitcoin’s security relies on elliptic-curve cryptography, which is currently safe against classical computers. However, sufficiently powerful quantum computers could theoretically derive private keys from public keys, potentially allowing attackers to steal funds.
Some estimates suggest that up to ~10 million BTC (close to 50% of total supply) could be vulnerable in such a scenario—particularly coins held in older or exposed addresses.

Important Context
This is not a present-day threat.
Quantum computers capable of breaking Bitcoin’s cryptography do not currently exist.
The risk is theoretical and long-term, but Wood argues it challenges Bitcoin’s narrative as a permanent store of value.
While Bitcoin developers have discussed quantum-resistant upgrades, no migration has yet occurred.

Portfolio Shift
Instead of Bitcoin, Wood has reallocated capital into:
Physical gold
Gold mining equities
This reflects his view that traditional hard assets have less technological tail risk over multi-decade horizons.

Bottom Line
Wood’s move does not mean Bitcoin is about to fail.
It highlights a growing institutional debate:
Can Bitcoin adapt fast enough if quantum computing advances faster than expected?
For now, the threat is hypothetical—but for long-term allocators, even low-probability existential risks matter.
·
--
$NEAR Why NEAR Protocol is a Top Layer 1 Contender in 2026 ​What is NEAR Protocol? NEAR is a high-performance, decentralized "cloud" platform designed to host the next generation of dApps. It solves the "blockchain trilemma" by being scalable, secure, and incredibly easy to use. ​The Masterminds Behind the Project The NEAR Collective was co-founded by two tech heavyweights: ​Illia Polosukhin: A former Google engineer and a co-author of the "Attention Is All You Need" paper—the very research that birthed modern Generative AI (Transformers). ​Alex Skidanov: A former Microsoft engineer and expert in distributed systems. ​Key Technology: Nightshade Sharding While other chains struggle with congestion, NEAR uses Nightshade Sharding. This allows the network to process thousands of transactions per second (TPS) with near-zero fees, all while maintaining true decentralization. ​Why is the $NEAR Token Essential? ​Network Fees: Used to pay for transactions and data storage. ​Staking: Holders can stake their tokens to secure the network and earn rewards. ​Governance: Token holders vote on the future direction of the ecosystem. ​AI Integration: NEAR is positioning itself as the premier blockchain for Decentralized AI (DeAI), leveraging the founders' deep expertise in the field. With its human-readable addresses (e.g., user.near) and focus on "Chain Abstraction," NEAR is removing the friction that stops mass adoption. It’s not just another Ethereum competitor; it’s the infrastructure for an AI-driven, decentralized future. $NEAR 👀😎
$NEAR Why NEAR Protocol is a Top Layer 1 Contender in 2026

​What is NEAR Protocol?
NEAR is a high-performance, decentralized "cloud" platform designed to host the next generation of dApps. It solves the "blockchain trilemma" by being scalable, secure, and incredibly easy to use.

​The Masterminds Behind the Project
The NEAR Collective was co-founded by two tech heavyweights:
​Illia Polosukhin: A former Google engineer and a co-author of the "Attention Is All You Need" paper—the very research that birthed modern Generative AI (Transformers).
​Alex Skidanov: A former Microsoft engineer and expert in distributed systems.
​Key Technology: Nightshade Sharding
While other chains struggle with congestion, NEAR uses Nightshade Sharding. This allows the network to process thousands of transactions per second (TPS) with near-zero fees, all while maintaining true decentralization.

​Why is the $NEAR Token Essential?
​Network Fees: Used to pay for transactions and data storage.
​Staking: Holders can stake their tokens to secure the network and earn rewards.
​Governance: Token holders vote on the future direction of the ecosystem.
​AI Integration: NEAR is positioning itself as the premier blockchain for Decentralized AI (DeAI), leveraging the founders' deep expertise in the field.

With its human-readable addresses (e.g., user.near) and focus on "Chain Abstraction," NEAR is removing the friction that stops mass adoption. It’s not just another Ethereum competitor; it’s the infrastructure for an AI-driven, decentralized future.

$NEAR 👀😎
·
--
Negatīvs
$FRAX 3 shorts today 😁
$FRAX 3 shorts today 😁
·
--
A Quiet War Inside Bitcoin Bitcoin doesn’t fight its battles in headlines — it fights them in code. At the core of the Bitcoin network are thousands of independent nodes. They enforce the consensus rules, but they also apply local policies — especially around the mempool, where unconfirmed transactions wait. And that’s where the tension begins. 🔹 Consensus rules decide what is a valid Bitcoin transaction. 🔹 Mempool policies decide what a node is willing to relay or store. These policies are not globally enforced, and node operators can — and do — disagree. Some nodes: Reject low-fee or “spam-like” transactions Filter certain script types or data usage Run alternative implementations (e.g. Bitcoin Knots instead of Bitcoin Core) None of this breaks Bitcoin — but it changes how transactions propagate, which ones reach miners faster, and who effectively sets the “standards” of the network. This has turned mempool policy into a new battlefield: Should defaults be strict to protect decentralization? Or flexible to preserve permissionless use? Who decides what counts as “spam” on a neutral money network? There’s no fork. No dramatic collapse. Just a slow, ongoing negotiation between code, incentives, and ideology. Bitcoin’s strength isn’t that everyone agrees — it’s that disagreement is allowed. And that quiet tension may be exactly what keeps it decentralized.
A Quiet War Inside Bitcoin
Bitcoin doesn’t fight its battles in headlines — it fights them in code.
At the core of the Bitcoin network are thousands of independent nodes. They enforce the consensus rules, but they also apply local policies — especially around the mempool, where unconfirmed transactions wait.
And that’s where the tension begins.
🔹 Consensus rules decide what is a valid Bitcoin transaction.
🔹 Mempool policies decide what a node is willing to relay or store.
These policies are not globally enforced, and node operators can — and do — disagree.
Some nodes:
Reject low-fee or “spam-like” transactions
Filter certain script types or data usage
Run alternative implementations (e.g. Bitcoin Knots instead of Bitcoin Core)
None of this breaks Bitcoin — but it changes how transactions propagate, which ones reach miners faster, and who effectively sets the “standards” of the network.
This has turned mempool policy into a new battlefield:
Should defaults be strict to protect decentralization?
Or flexible to preserve permissionless use?
Who decides what counts as “spam” on a neutral money network?
There’s no fork. No dramatic collapse.
Just a slow, ongoing negotiation between code, incentives, and ideology.
Bitcoin’s strength isn’t that everyone agrees —
it’s that disagreement is allowed.
And that quiet tension may be exactly what keeps it decentralized.
·
--
ETFsMorgan Stanley Plans to Launch Bitcoin and Solana ETFs Morgan Stanley has filed applications with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to launch two new exchange-traded funds (ETFs) linked to cryptocurrencies: one tracking Bitcoin and another tracking Solana. If approved, these ETFs would allow investors to gain exposure to cryptocurrencies through traditional financial markets, without needing to directly buy, store, or manage digital assets themselves. The Bitcoin ETF would track the spot price of Bitcoin, while the Solana ETF could potentially include staking rewards, which would be a notable innovation among crypto ETFs. Why This Matters This move represents a significant step in the mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies by traditional financial institutions. Morgan Stanley would become one of the first major U.S. banks to offer spot crypto ETFs under its own brand, joining asset managers like BlackRock and Fidelity in expanding regulated access to digital assets. ETFs are especially attractive to institutional and retail investors because they are traded on regulated exchanges, fit easily into existing portfolios, and avoid the technical and security challenges associated with holding cryptocurrencies directly. Broader Context The filings come amid a more favorable regulatory environment in the United States following the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs and increasing openness by regulators toward crypto-based investment products. Wall Street firms are accelerating their push into digital assets as client demand continues to grow. Morgan Stanley has already been expanding crypto access for its wealth management clients and is reportedly exploring broader crypto trading options through platforms such as E*TRADE. Key Takeaways The ETFs are not yet approved; SEC authorization is still required. Launch dates, fees, and trading venues have not been announced. A Solana ETF is particularly significant, as it signals growing institutional interest beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. Approval could further legitimize cryptocurrencies and increase market liquidity. Overall, Morgan Stanley’s move highlights the ongoing integration of cryptocurrencies into the traditional financial system and suggests continued growth in institutional crypto adoption.

ETFs

Morgan Stanley Plans to Launch Bitcoin and Solana ETFs
Morgan Stanley has filed applications with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to launch two new exchange-traded funds (ETFs) linked to cryptocurrencies: one tracking Bitcoin and another tracking Solana.
If approved, these ETFs would allow investors to gain exposure to cryptocurrencies through traditional financial markets, without needing to directly buy, store, or manage digital assets themselves. The Bitcoin ETF would track the spot price of Bitcoin, while the Solana ETF could potentially include staking rewards, which would be a notable innovation among crypto ETFs.
Why This Matters
This move represents a significant step in the mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies by traditional financial institutions. Morgan Stanley would become one of the first major U.S. banks to offer spot crypto ETFs under its own brand, joining asset managers like BlackRock and Fidelity in expanding regulated access to digital assets.
ETFs are especially attractive to institutional and retail investors because they are traded on regulated exchanges, fit easily into existing portfolios, and avoid the technical and security challenges associated with holding cryptocurrencies directly.
Broader Context
The filings come amid a more favorable regulatory environment in the United States following the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs and increasing openness by regulators toward crypto-based investment products. Wall Street firms are accelerating their push into digital assets as client demand continues to grow.
Morgan Stanley has already been expanding crypto access for its wealth management clients and is reportedly exploring broader crypto trading options through platforms such as E*TRADE.
Key Takeaways
The ETFs are not yet approved; SEC authorization is still required.
Launch dates, fees, and trading venues have not been announced.
A Solana ETF is particularly significant, as it signals growing institutional interest beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum.
Approval could further legitimize cryptocurrencies and increase market liquidity.
Overall, Morgan Stanley’s move highlights the ongoing integration of cryptocurrencies into the traditional financial system and suggests continued growth in institutional crypto adoption.
·
--
Honeypot tokeni"Honeypot" tokeni ir viens no visbiežāk sastopamajiem un draudīgākajiem meliem kriptovalūtu pasaulē. Nosaukums nāk no "medus podiņa", jo tie ir izstrādāti, lai ieguldītājus pievilinātu ar cerībām uz ātrām peļņām, taču tos ieguldi ar iespēju izkļūt. ​Šeit ir detalizēta izskaidrojuma par to, kā tie darbojas un kā tos identificēt. ​Kas tiešām ir Honeypot? ​Kriptos pasaulē honeypot ir spraudnis, kas paredzēts, lai ieguldītāji varētu pirkšanu ar tokenu, taču tajā ir paslēpta kods, kas neļauj tos pārdot.

Honeypot tokeni

"Honeypot" tokeni ir viens no visbiežāk sastopamajiem un draudīgākajiem meliem kriptovalūtu pasaulē. Nosaukums nāk no "medus podiņa", jo tie ir izstrādāti, lai ieguldītājus pievilinātu ar cerībām uz ātrām peļņām, taču tos ieguldi ar iespēju izkļūt.
​Šeit ir detalizēta izskaidrojuma par to, kā tie darbojas un kā tos identificēt.
​Kas tiešām ir Honeypot?
​Kriptos pasaulē honeypot ir spraudnis, kas paredzēts, lai ieguldītāji varētu pirkšanu ar tokenu, taču tajā ir paslēpta kods, kas neļauj tos pārdot.
·
--
Is the "De-risking" Over? ​After a volatile start to the new year, the market is showing signs of stabilization. Here is what’s driving digital assets today: ​JPMorgan Remains Optimistic: Analysts are predicting an end to the recent selling pressure. After ETFs saw outflows in December, January is showing "bottoming signals," and the stabilization of inflows into Bitcoin and Ethereum suggests that institutions are back in the game. 📈 ​Bitcoin Hovering Around $92,000: Although it briefly pulled back from the $94k mark, analysts like Cathie Wood (Ark Invest) are stirring the pot with comments regarding the potential formation of U.S. National Bitcoin Reserves. 🇺🇸 ​Morgan Stanley Goes "All-In": The banking giant has filed applications for its own Bitcoin, Solana, and Ethereum ETFs, signaling that Solana is becoming the third essential pillar of institutional portfolios. 🏦 ​AI Agents on the Blockchain: Forbes highlights 2026 as the year of "maturity," where AI agents begin to autonomously execute transactions via smart contracts, turning blockchain into the foundational infrastructure for Artificial Intelligence. ​Today’s Takeaway: The market is shifting from "hype" to "fundamentals." As U.S. regulation enters a crucial phase, investor focus is squarely on long-term integration with Traditional Finance (TradFi).
Is the "De-risking" Over?

​After a volatile start to the new year, the market is showing signs of stabilization. Here is what’s driving digital assets today:
​JPMorgan Remains Optimistic: Analysts are predicting an end to the recent selling pressure. After ETFs saw outflows in December, January is showing "bottoming signals," and the stabilization of inflows into Bitcoin and Ethereum suggests that institutions are back in the game. 📈

​Bitcoin Hovering Around $92,000: Although it briefly pulled back from the $94k mark, analysts like Cathie Wood (Ark Invest) are stirring the pot with comments regarding the potential formation of U.S. National Bitcoin Reserves. 🇺🇸

​Morgan Stanley Goes "All-In": The banking giant has filed applications for its own Bitcoin, Solana, and Ethereum ETFs, signaling that Solana is becoming the third essential pillar of institutional portfolios. 🏦

​AI Agents on the Blockchain: Forbes highlights 2026 as the year of "maturity," where AI agents begin to autonomously execute transactions via smart contracts, turning blockchain into the foundational infrastructure for Artificial Intelligence.
​Today’s Takeaway: The market is shifting from "hype" to "fundamentals." As U.S. regulation enters a crucial phase, investor focus is squarely on long-term integration with Traditional Finance (TradFi).
·
--
Future trading In futures trading, win rate is the only thing that matters; many people show their current realized profits but not their losses. ​Recently, I decided to test a new strategy in future, and so far it’s going well—I’m satisfied. My 7-day win rate is 100%. My 30-day win rate is 60%. ​I believe that to be successful in futures trading, the win rate must be minimun 55%. ​What is your win rate? ​Merry Christmas everyone!
Future trading

In futures trading, win rate is the only thing that matters; many people show their current realized profits but not their losses.
​Recently, I decided to test a new strategy in future, and so far it’s going well—I’m satisfied.

My 7-day win rate is 100%.
My 30-day win rate is 60%.

​I believe that to be successful in futures trading, the win rate must be minimun 55%.

​What is your win rate?

​Merry Christmas everyone!
·
--
$BTC Why is Bitcoin struggling to break $90,000? ​After hitting all-time highs above $120k earlier this year, Bitcoin is now facing a significant "liquidity crunch" as we head into late 2025. Here’s a breakdown of what’s stalling the market: ​1. The Liquidity Crisis: Market depth has dropped by nearly 30% on major exchanges. This means even mid-sized sell orders are causing disproportionate price drops because there aren't enough buy orders to absorb the pressure. ​2. Whale & ETF Sell-offs: Large holders ("whales") are using the $90k mark to take profits. Simultaneously, Bitcoin ETFs are seeing net outflows as institutional investors de-risk their portfolios. ​3. Macro Winds & Geopolitics: The "Trump Tariff" effect is real. Concerns over new trade wars and potential inflation spikes are keeping the Fed cautious. Plus, the unwinding of the "Yen Carry Trade" continues to force liquidations across all risky assets. ​4. Wall Street Rules the Game: Bitcoin is no longer driven by pure retail hype. With institutional algorithms now controlling the flow, $90k has become a massive psychological and technical resistance level. ​Unless we see a significant surge in buying volume, BTC might test the $80k - $85k support zone before any potential "Santa Rally" kicks in.
$BTC
Why is Bitcoin struggling to break $90,000?

​After hitting all-time highs above $120k earlier this year, Bitcoin is now facing a significant "liquidity crunch" as we head into late 2025. Here’s a breakdown of what’s stalling the market:

​1. The Liquidity Crisis: Market depth has dropped by nearly 30% on major exchanges. This means even mid-sized sell orders are causing disproportionate price drops because there aren't enough buy orders to absorb the pressure.

​2. Whale & ETF Sell-offs: Large holders ("whales") are using the $90k mark to take profits. Simultaneously, Bitcoin ETFs are seeing net outflows as institutional investors de-risk their portfolios.

​3. Macro Winds & Geopolitics: The "Trump Tariff" effect is real. Concerns over new trade wars and potential inflation spikes are keeping the Fed cautious. Plus, the unwinding of the "Yen Carry Trade" continues to force liquidations across all risky assets.

​4. Wall Street Rules the Game: Bitcoin is no longer driven by pure retail hype. With institutional algorithms now controlling the flow, $90k has become a massive psychological and technical resistance level.

​Unless we see a significant surge in buying volume, BTC might test the $80k - $85k support zone before any potential "Santa Rally" kicks in.
·
--
Yesterday was good day for making profit
Yesterday was good day for making profit
·
--
$PTB some shit coin sometimes make good profit 😁
$PTB some shit coin sometimes make good profit 😁
·
--
$ZEC I'm shorting zec, believe it will fall bellow $300 very soon, maybe much more... Will see
$ZEC I'm shorting zec, believe it will fall bellow $300 very soon, maybe much more... Will see
·
--
$HMSTR I don't like this candles, be very careful
$HMSTR I don't like this candles, be very careful
Pieraksties, lai skatītu citu saturu
Uzzini jaunākās kriptovalūtu ziņas
⚡️ Iesaisties jaunākajās diskusijās par kriptovalūtām
💬 Mijiedarbojies ar saviem iemīļotākajiem satura veidotājiem
👍 Apskati tevi interesējošo saturu
E-pasta adrese / tālruņa numurs
Vietnes plāns
Sīkdatņu preferences
Platformas noteikumi