I have nothing but respect for @VitalikButerin, but focusing on upgrading @ethereum to RISC-V is a giant side quest and would be a colossal strategic mistake: - Execution layer ossification and efficiency are goals in fundamental tension - "zk" (or succinct) VMs all rely on special precompiles anyways - RISC-V would do nothing to address @ethereum's DevEx and UX fragmentation problems or provide privacy-preserving apps, which people want way more than marginal efficiency gains
In my view, @ethereum should focus on something else, and time is running out for strategic vacillation.
Quick update on the @namada shielded airdrop to @zcash: @heliaxdev does not have the resources to commit to this work in Q3, so in lieu of that I'm offering a $20k bounty (payable in ZEC/NAM/USDC) to anyone who implements a full prototype that can be verified + tested. Link 👇
"Cryptoeconomics" isn't a real field, it's just cybernetics rebranded, in denial of actual history. Distributed consensus systems and practical zero-knowledge proofs are real progress in the possibility space, but they don't merit a new field.
The problem with the @ethereum EVM is that the state architecture is incompatible with privacy and incompatible with multichain state. The problem with the EVM isn't the ISA. Just add `EVAL` and JIT bytecode sequences if you want to optimize stuff (like jets in @urbit Nock).
Es tikko aizsargāju 1000 @noble_xyz USDC uz @namada, un vēlos to izdalīt nākamo 24 stundu laikā pirmajiem 100 cilvēkiem, kuri palīdzēs mums veikt produkta testēšanu.
Noteikumi: 1) Aizsargājiet dažus aktīvus, izmantojot @namada. Šeit ir ceļvedis: https://t.co/PX4xgQxgUj 2) Q/T šo tvītu ar ekrānuzņēmumu par jūsu aizsargātajiem aktīviem, jūsu znam adresi un jebkādu atsauksmi par jūsu pieredzi / ko varētu uzlabot / ko jūs varētu vēlēties darīt ar @namada. 3) Pirmie 100 cilvēki, kas to izdarīs, saņems 10 USDC kā pateicību par produkta testēšanu! Man var aizņemt dienu vai divas, lai visu pārskatītu, lūdzu, esiet pacietīgi, ja es nejauši jūs palaidīšu garām.
coinbase is lame but this problem is structural, it is not specific to them. data exfiltration is inevitable.
three key ingredients: irreversible transfers + KYC everywhere + low-trust society. you can draw the conclusions. perhaps it's time for crypto to go back underground.
every day I am amazed that @bitcoin's security model is simply broken and people continue to buy it, shill it, and act as if it could back world finance. "digital gold" is not compatible with Nakamoto consensus security!
the reckoning will be brutal, and it will be deserved.
What would it mean for @namada to become a composable privacy layer for the crypto/multichain ecosystem? I've investigated this product proposition and come up with an analytical frame - let me know what you think! 👇
.@heliaxdev meklē ne vienu, ne divas, bet TRĪS inženieru pozīcijas, lai strādātu pie @anoma un @namada: - Pielietotais kompilators inženieris - Izplatīto sistēmu inženieris - Protokolu un infrastruktūras inženieris
Visus sīkākus datus atradīsiet https://heliax.dev/jobs un, lūdzu, dalieties!
Pieraksties, lai skatītu citu saturu
Uzzini jaunākās kriptovalūtu ziņas
⚡️ Iesaisties jaunākajās diskusijās par kriptovalūtām
💬 Mijiedarbojies ar saviem iemīļotākajiem satura veidotājiem